“Senator Marco Rubio is requested to insure my mother’s release from a human trafficking ring that operates out of the probate /guardian court.”

By Barbara Stone, Esq. Attorney Whistleblower on The Florida Bar and its Members, this is Serious Bullshit about Elderly Abuse and Murder in the Courts!


Attorney Barbara Stone Whistleblower Complaint Criminal Charges

http://www.iviewit.tv/BarbaraStoneCriminal ComplaintMarch2 2015.pdf

Attorney Barbara Stone Whistleblower Complaint to Florida Bar

http://www.iviewit.tv/Barbara Stone Florida Bar Whistleblower.pdf

Before Guardian

mom before guardianship and me. jpeg

After Guardian

mom emaciated mom in hospital

Subject: URGENT -Senator Marco Rubio is requested to insure my mother’s release from a human trafficking ring that operates out of the probate /guardian court.

Dear Senator Rubio:

I met with Alyn Fernandez in your office along with Dr. Robert Sarhan to discuss the racketeer industry that is human trafficking elderly adults and laundering their money in the probate court in the state of Florida, a racketeer court that exists to extort the assets of a vulnerable adult and subject them to a string of felony crimes.

My mother has been captured in a “guardianship” where she is being subjected to atrocities by criminals who operate as a “judge” and “guardians” and “attorneys”.

This crime was reported to you by Dr. Robert Sarhan who met with you and informed you his mother would be murdered by drugs and abuse if you did not protect her. You did not assist and Dr. Sarhan’s mother was murdered. Her death certificate shows she died from toxic drugs. The doctor who administered the drugs was found guilty of murdering a young boy by overdosing him.

My mother and I and Dr Sarhan and his mother are part of countless number of victims of this racket.

We have much voter influence and the media is voraciously covering our story.

Like Dr. Sarhan’s mother, my mother will die without you intervention and taking a strong stand that you will not tolerate this crime.

Ms. Fernandez assured me that my mother’s matter would be given top priority by your office but she has failed to return my calls and emails.

My mother needs to be removed from her captivity by this RICO enterprise composed of Micheal Genden a criminal disguised as a judge, Jacqueline Hertz and Blaire Lapides also criminals disguised as “guardians” and Roy Lustig, a criminal disguised as an attorney.

Please contact me immediately There is no greater political issue than the safety of the citizens of the state of Florida and their protection from criminal racketeering by state officers.

Barbara Stone
305 494 2463
Sent from my BlackBerry® by Boost Mobile
From: barbara stone <bstone575@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Apr 2015 13:56:13 -0400
To: Fernandez, Alyn (Rubio)<Alyn_Fernandez@rubio.senate.gov>
Cc: <wolfe@startribune.com>; <witrogen@comcast.net>; <thomaswh@edenalt.com>; Peter Whitehouse<pjw3@po.cwru.edu>; <ageon@zoominternet.net>; <hrmoody@yahoo.com>; <chucknicholas@verizon.net>; <ann@annfishman.com>; Carol Segrave<carol.segrave@verizon.net>; <drjohnmig@aol.com>; Richard Adler<radler@digiplaces.com>; <dbwolfe@idrm.com>; <jimgilmartin@comingofage.com>; <info@agelight.com>; Linda Wiener<linda@businessandaging.com>; <GrossAssoc@AOL.com>; <len@lenhansen.com>; Brent Green<brent@bgassociates.com>; Andrew Carle<acarle@gmu.edu>; Connie Goldman<Congoldman@aol.com>; <jghaas@aol.com>; <dleder@loyola.edu>; <rdobrof@hunter.cuny.edu>; <jpmarosy@charter.net>; <erosowsk@bidmc.harvard.edu>; <thperls@bu.edu>; Margery Silver<msilver@lasell.edu>; <willits1@attbi.com>; <JAMilgram@aol.com>; <howard@2young2retire.com>; <patsamples@agingandcaregiving.com>; <tcole@utmb.edu>; Dennis Kodner<DLKodner@aol.com>; <achenbaum@uh.edu>; Marc Freedman<mfreedman@civicventures.org>; George Schofield<george@georgeschofield.com>; <etkimball@aol.com>; <msbrb@erols.com>; Adriane Berg<adrianeberg@msn.com>; <torres@sppsr.ucla.edu>; <rmanheimer@unca.edu>; <anysea13@hotmail.com>; <jana@janabommersbach.com>; <Info@LynnDeanLaw.com>; <gja417@aol.com>; <ramsey-klawsnik@comcast.net>; <tgregorie@att.net>; <brownell@fordham.edu>; Paula Mixson<paula.mixson@gmail.com>; <info@bewiseonline.org>; <info@lifespan-roch.org>; <mvitez@phillynews.com>; <carol@mindingourelders.com>; <editor@theboomermagazine.com>; <publisher@theboomermagazine.com>; <evening@cbsnews.com>; <ams@cbsnews.com>; <weekends@cbsnews.com>; <weekend@cbsnews.com>; <niteline@abc.com>; <abc.news.magazines@abc.com>; <2020@abc.com>; <wnn@abcnews.com>; <thisweek@abc.com>; <Comments@foxnews.com>; <comments@foxkids.com>; <AmericasNewsroom@foxnews.com>; <Beltway@foxnews.com>; <Myword@foxnews.com>; <Bigstory-weekend@foxnews.com>; <Bullsandbears@foxnews.com>; <Cash@foxnews.com>; <Cavuto@foxnews.com>; <Fncimag@foxnews.com>; <Forbes@foxnews.com>; <Friends@foxnews.com>; <Feedback@foxnews.com>; <Jamie@foxnews.com>; <Fncspecials@foxnews.com>; <FNS@foxnews.com>; <Newswatch@foxnews.com>; <Foxreport@foxnews.com>; <Atlarge@foxnews.com>; <Hannityandcolmes@foxnews.com>; <Heartland@foxnews.com>; <JER@foxnews.com>; <Lineup@foxnews.com>; <Martha@foxnews.com>; <Ontherecord@foxnews.com>; <Oreilly@foxnews.com>; <Redeye@foxnews.com>; Bret Baier<Special@foxnews.com>; <Studiob@foxnews.com>; <Hemmer@foxnews.com>; <colonelscorner@foxnews.com>; <Fatherjonathan@foxnews.com>; <Drmanny@foxnews.com>; <Lisonlaw@foxnews.com>; <Housecall@foxnews.com>; <letters@msnbc.com>; <viewerservices@msnbc.com>; <WebEditors@newsweek.com>; <Letters@newsweek.com>; <Editors@newsweek.com>; <Today@NBC.com>; <WT@nbc.com>; <Nightly@NBC.com>; <Dateline@NBC.com>; <MTP@NBC.com>; <countdown@msnbc.com>; <AbramsReport@msnbc.com>; <hardball@msnbc.com>; <Tucker@msnbc.com>; <themost@msnbc.com>; <MSNBCInvestigates@msnbc.com>; <nn5news@newsnet5.com>; <joe@msnbc.com>; <business@MSNBC.com>; <GeneralComments@feedback.msnbc.com>; <TheNews@msnbc.com>; <Banfield@msnbc.com>; <Nachman@msnbc.com>; <Headliners@msnbc.com>; <weekendtoday@nbc.com>; <World@MSNBC.com>; <comments@wnyt.com>; <news@newschannel34.com>; News 12 BK & BX<news12bx@news12.com>; <news.12li@news12.com>; <webstaff@wnbc.com>; <news@netmio.com>; <news@whec.com>; <planews@thechamplainchannel.com>; <wtvh@wtvh.com>; <newslink2@wktv.com>; <drutherford@mail.wwnytv.net>; <ediarelations@icij.org>; <drphil@drphil.com>; <news12wc@news12.com>; <spatel@phillyburbs.com>; <news12nj@news12.com>; <news12ct@news12.com>; <webstaff@nbc4.tv>; <mtynews@theksbwchannel.com>; <feedback@myoc.net>; <walker@journalbroadcastgroup.com>; <webstaff@thekcrachannel.com>; <webstaff@nbc30.com>; <rmorgan@ctpost.com>; <dcnews@nbc4.com>; <gsnews@thecarolinachannel.com>; <ReutersNews@msnbc.com>; <jpilios@ackerley.com>; <sjungling@chicoer.com>; <editor@nctimes.com>; <enoch@ksee.com>; <balnews@thewbalchannel.com>; <phinews@ibsys.com>; <webstaff@NBC3.com>; <ksby@ksby.com>; <feedback@insidevc.com>; <newmedia@seattle-pi.com>; <news@kshb.com>; <cat@pressdemo.com>; <webstaff@NBCSandiego.com>; <feedback@startribune.com>; <jimseybert@standardspeaker.com>; <webmaster@seacoastonline.com>; <mprowland@fosters.com>; Whdhtv Boston<webmaster@whdh.com>; <webmaster@nbc12.com>; Bill Dedman<bill@powerreporting.com>; <dij@cbsnews.com>; <rod.prince@nbc.com>; <pjh@cbsnews.com>; <browne@foxnews.com>; <gramshaw@newshour.org>; <pls@cbsnews.com>; <dmedrano@telemundo.com>; <maureensm@ffww.com>; <cochs@ap.org>; <sharon.newman@abc.com>; <realitycheck@cbsnews.com>; <lisa.hsia@nbc.com>; <mail@uttm.com>; <susan.dutcher@nbc.com>; <rvizcon@telemundo.com>; <evaldez@univision.net>; <mimi.gurbst@abc.com>; <diefenbach@foxnews.com>; <stella.dawson@reuters.com>; <jcohen@bloomberg.net>; <brian_hill@metronetworks.com>; <gil.pimentel@abc.com>; <stu.schutzman@abc.com>; <thismorning@cbsnews.com>; <sundays@cbsnews.com>; <48hours@cbsnews.com>; <jonathan.wald@nbc.com>; <penny.britell@abc.com>; <muriel.pearson@abc.com>; <plorris@univision.net>; <abenitez@univision.net>; <danschiedel@kozk.pbs.org>; <steve.majors@nbc.com>; <mcurtis@njn.org>; <meredith.white@abc.com>; <sheberer@pbs.org>; <mark.nelson@abc.com>; Adam Walser<adam.walser@wfts.com>; Michael Miller<Michael.miller@miaminewtimes.com>; <virginia.moseley@abc.com>; <ftn@cbsnews.com>; <betsy.fischer@nbc.com>; <dibella@foxnews.com>; <dsowiens@mdp.com>; <tina.cowles@cnn.com>; <jason.cahill@turner.com>; <jamie.allen@turner.com>; <jocelyn.cordova@nbc.com>; <tracie.fiss@nbc.com>; <debbie.vickers@nbc.com>; <stephanie.ross@nbc.com>; <dave.berg@nbc.com>; <chouinard@incorrect.com>; <janesang@aol.com>; <rkendler@biznet-news.com>; <christian.hudson@turner.com>; <Ben.Sherwood@nbc.com>; <marilyn.fletcher@nbc.com>; <marianne.haggerty@nbc.com>; <ay.palmer@barrons.com>; <gerry_khermouch@businessweek.com>; <hardy_green@businessweek.com>; <cooks@csps.com>; Marshall Ingwerson<ingwersonm@csps.com>; <jlevine@forbes.com>; <askannie@fortunemail.com>; <alison_brower@condenast.com>; <kpowers@hearst.com>; <editorial@harpers.org>; Paul Brown<paulbbrown@aol.com>; <entertainment@csps.com>; <lowej@csps.com>; <saborn@mdp.com>; <mgilman@mdp.com>; <melissa_stanton@lifeedit.com>; <jeanie_pyun@condenast.com>; <russell@maximmag.com>; <connolly@maximmag.com>; <mimi.jones@readersdigest.com>; <vanessa@redherring.com>; <draffel@hearst.com>; <jfarrell@mccalls.com>; <bchernetz@mccalls.com>; <jeffo@wiredmag.com>; <rmappelbaum@kingworld.com>; <joanne.saltzman@abc.com>; <james.avenell@warnerbros.com>; <newspath@cbs.com>; <mnr@cbs.com>; <lfd@cbs.com>; <submit@wiredmag.com>; <abeim@hfmmag.com>; <Rainy.farrell@nbc.com>; <negerp@ABC.com>; <cas@cbsnews.com>; <mollyo8@hotmail.com>; <mrw@cbsnews.com>; <marktipton@aol.com>; <roberta_caploe@primediamags.com>; <lyoung@hearst.com>; <jsarkin@vf.com>; <reginatj@fairchildpub.com>; <will.blythe@mensjournal.com>; <hblack@mdp.com>; <leo_carey@newyorker.com>; <henry_finder@newyorker.com>; <alice_truax@newyorker.com>; <james_katz@peoplemag.com>; <edwards@mdp.com>; <melissa_stanton@peoplemag.com>; <eric.schrier@readersdigest.com>; <leachs@csps.com>; Clayton Collins<collinsc@csps.com>; <home@csps.com>; Jenny Ruark<jennifer.ruark@chronicle.com>; <mickeyb@thestandard.com>; <swalsh@thestandard.com>; <dana_coffield@ziffdavis.com>; <guerrag@fairchildpub.com>; <ffrailey@kiplingers.com>; <bfrick@kiplingers.com>; <jsearles@hearst.com>; <rlesonsky@entrepreneur.com>; <jnash@essence.com>; <estoianoff@familycircle.com>; <sadams@forbes.com>; <jackson@forbes.com>; <tvinas@industryweek.com>; <christopherheath@wftv.com>; <jk@alm.com>; dan noyes<dan.noyes@abc.com>; <ppj1@hush.com>; <information@elderaffairs.org>; <marshalla@elderaffairs.org>; <john.keyes@wftv.com>; Joan Chrissos<jchrissos@miamiherald.com>; <cfrank@miamiherald.com>; <cmarbin@miamiherald.com>; Michael Sallah<msallah@miamiherald.com>; <rbarry@miamiherald.com>; helpmehoward@wsvn.com<helpmehoward@wsvn.com>; <clue@wsvn.co>; jjburdi@tribune.com<jjburdi@tribune.com>; musgrave@pbpost.com<musgrave@pbpost.com>; Janine Gibson<Janine.gibson@theguardian.com>; Stuart Millar<Stuart.millar@theguardian.com>; <tips@nationalenquirer.com>; john.emshwiller@wsj.com<John.emshwiller@wsj.com>; gary.fields@wsj.com<Gary.fields@wsj.com>; <Michael.siconolfi@wsj.com>; barbara.hollingsworth@cjonline.com<barbara.hollingsworth@cjonline.com>; Bob Norman<BNorman@wplg.com>; scoop@huffingtonpost.com<scoop@huffingtonpost.com>; <chamby@publicintegrity.org>; wkroustan@sunsentinel.com<wkroustan@sunsentinel.com>; raolmeda@tribune.com<raolmeda@tribune.com>; <mediarelations@publicintegrity.org>; <membership.inquiries@publicintegrity.org>; <contact@icij.org>; <investigations@icij.org>; Scott Powers<smpowers@tribune.com>; <neil.abercrombie@mail.house.gov>; <Robert@mail.house.gov>; <rep.tomallen@mail.house.gov>; <rob.andrews@mail.house.gov>; <Howard.Berman@mail.house.gov>; <bishop.email@mail.house.gov>; <blunt@mail.house.gov>; <john.boehner@mail.house.gov>; <Ninthnet@mail.house.gov>; <cannon.ut03@mail.house.gov>; <Rep.Carson@mail.house.gov>; <delaware@mail.house.gov>; <jclyburn@mail.house.gov>; <John.Conyers@mail.house.gov>; <budmail@mail.house.gov>; <write2joecrowley@mail.house.gov>; <degette@mail.house.gov>; <William.Delahunt@mail.house.gov>; <lloyd.doggett@mail.house.gov>; <doolittle@mail.house.gov>; <rep.doyle@mail.house.gov>; <annagram@mail.house.gov>; <samfarr@mail.house.gov>; <TalkToBobFilner@mail.house.gov>; <vito.fossella@mail.house.gov>; <Gingrey.GA@mail.house.gov>; <texas.granger@mail.house.gov>; <sam.graves@mail.house.gov>; <jane.harman@mail.house.gov>; <alcee.pubhastings@mail.house.gov>; <mhinchey@mail.house.gov>; <tellhoek@mail.house.gov>; <mike.honda@mail.house.gov>; <Jay.Inslee@mail.house.gov>; <congressman.issa@mail.house.gov>; <rep.johnson@mail.house.gov>; <webpage@feingold.senate.gov>; <stephanie.tubbs.jones@mail.house.gov>; <REP.KAPTUR@mail.house.gov>; <dkildee@mail.house.gov>; <jack.kingston@mail.house.gov>; <tom.la05@mail.house.gov>; <barbara.lee@mail.house.gov>; <john.lewis@mail.house.gov>; <lobiondo@mail.house.gov>; <lofgren@mail.house.gov>; <Stephen.Lynch@mail.house.gov>; <CongMcIntyre@mail.house.gov>; <John.Mica@mail.house.gov>; <rep.carolyn.maloney@mail.house.gov>; <mtmeeham@mail.house.gov>; GeorgeMiller Staff<George.Miller@mail.house.gov>; Robert Sarhan<drrob2007@yahoo.com>; Eliot Bernstein<iviewit5@gmail.com>; JoAnne M Denison, Esq.<JoAnne@justice4every1.com>; Candice Schwager, Esq.<schwagerlawfirm@live.com>; <paige.kreegel@myfloridahouse.gov>; <mike.larosa@myfloridahouse.gov>; <chris.latvala@myfloridahouse.gov>; <larry.lee@myfloridahouse.gov>; <debbie.mayfield@myfloridahouse.gov>; <charles.mcburney@myfloridahouse.gov>; <kionne.mcghee@myfloridahouse.gov>; <larry.metz@myfloridahouse.gov>; <george.moraitis@myfloridahouse.gov>; <jared.moskowitz@myfloridahouse.gov>; <mike.miller@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Amanda.murphy@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Edwin.narain@myfloridahouse.gov>; <jeanette.nunez@myfloridahouse.gov>; <jose.oliva@myfloridahouse.gov>; <marlene.otoole@myfloridahouse.gov>; <mark.pafford@myfloridahouse.gov>; <kathleen.passidomo@myfloridahouse.gov>; <keith.perry@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Kathleen.peters@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Cary.pigman@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Ray.pilon@myfloridahouse.gov>; <scott.plakon@myfloridahouse.gov>; <rene.placensia@myfloridahouse.gov>; <elizabeth.porter@myfloridahouse.gov>; <bobby.powell@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Sharon.pritchett@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Jake.raburn@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Kevin.rader@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Danile.raulerson@myfloridahouse.gov>; <lake.ray@myfloridahouse.gov>; <michelle.rehwinkel@myfloridahouse.gov>; <ronald.renuart@myfloridahouse.gov>; <david.richardson@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Kenneth.roberson@myfloridahouse.gov>; <hazelle.rogers@myfloridahouse.gov>; <ray.rodrigues@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Patrick.rooney@myfloridahouse.gov>; <darryl.rouson@myfloridahouse.gov>; <david.santiago@myfloridahouse.gov>; <irving.slosberg@myfloridahouse.gov>; <jimmie.smith@myfloridahouse.gov>; <ross.spano@myfloridahouse.gov>; <chris.sprowls@myfloridahouse.gov>; <cynthia.stafford@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Richard.stark@myfloridahouse.gov>; <greg.steube@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Charlie.stone@myfloridahouse.gov>; <jennifer.sullivan@myfloridahouse.gov>; <dwayne.taylor@myfloridahouse.gov>; <carlos.trujillo@myfloridahouse.gov>; <victor.torres@myfloridahouse.gov>; <jay.trumbull@myfloridahouse.gov>; <john.tobia@myfloridahouse.gov>; <charles.vanzant@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Barbara.watson@myfloridahouse.gov>; <Clovis.watson@myfloridahouse.gov>; <alan.williams@myfloridahouse.gov>; <john.wood@myfloridahouse.gov>; <ritch.workman@myfloridahouse.gov>; <dana.young@myfloridahouse.gov>; barbara stone<bstone575@gmail.com>
Subject: URGENT -Senator Marco Rubio requested to insure my mother’s release from a human trafficking ring that operates out of the probate /guardian court.

URGENT – Marco Rubio requested to insure my mother’s release from a human trafficking ring that operates out of the probate /guardian court.

Dear Ms. Fernandez:

This will follow up our meeting yesterday regarding my mother’s imminent danger wherein you indicated you would take the necessary steps to protect her and see that she is taken to the hospital for emergency evaluation and that she is removed from the criminal racketeering ring comprised of Michael Genden, Roy Lustig, Blaire Lapides, Jacqueline Hertz and Alan Stone who are human trafficking her and extorting and money laundering her assets.


I am other have made Senator Marco Rubio aware of the racketeering enterprise that exists in the probate/guardian court.

As an attorney, I am a whistle blower to the corruption. Attached is a copy of the filing with the Supreme Court judges which I left with your office and the criminal complaint I have filed against this racketeering ring.

The constituents of Senator Marco Rubio and the voters in the State of Florida and throughout the country are appalled that this “murder for hire” plot exists in the probate court in Florida.

Could you please advise me of the actions that have been taken to have my mother admitted to the hospital and insure her safety.

Barbara Stone
305 494 2463

This will request Joanne, Candice, Eliot and all others post this and circulate virally


On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:36 PM, Fernandez, Alyn (Rubio) <Alyn_Fernandez@rubio.senate.gov> wrote:

Regional Director, South Region

8669 N.W. 36th Street, Suite 110
Miami, Florida 33166
Phone: 305-418-8553
Fax: 305-594-4014

Stay Informed! Sign up for weekly newsletters at: www.rubio.senate.gov

From: barbara stone [mailto:bstone575@gmail.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 14, 2015 12:27 PM
To: Fernandez, Alyn (Rubio)
Cc: barbara stone
Subject: confirming appt today at 4

Dear Alyn

This will confirm our appointment today at 4 at your office at 8669 NW 36 ST Suite 110.

Please confirm your receipt of this note.

Thank you

Barbara Stone
305 494 2463


Letter to DOJ Inspector General Michael Horowitz and Detective Andrew Panzer of the Palm Beach Sheriff Department that Eliot and Family in Danger!

This is scary NOT BULLSHIT.

From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein [mailto:iviewit@iviewit.tv]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 7:07 AM
To: Michael Horowitz ~ Partner @ Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP (michael.horowitz@cwt.com); ‘The Honorable Glenn Alan Fine, Inspector General ~ Department of Justice’
Cc: ‘Barbara Stone (bstone575@gmail.com)’; ‘JoAnne M. Denison Esq. @ Denison & Associates, PC (jdenison@surfree.com)’; Candice Schwager @ Schwager Law Firm (candiceschwager@icloud.com); ‘Andrew Dietz @ Rock-It Cargo USA, Inc. (andyd@rockitcargo.com)’; ‘CANDICE BERNSTEIN (tourcandy@gmail.com)’; ‘Caroline Prochotska Rogers Esq. (caroline@cprogers.com)’; ‘Eliot I. Bernstein (iviewit@iviewit.tv)’; ‘Marc R. Garber Esq. (marcrgarber@gmail.com)’; ‘Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C. (marc.garber@flastergreenberg.com)’; ‘Michele M. Mulrooney ~ Partner @ Venable LLP (mmulrooney@Venable.com)’
Subject: Eliot Bernstein. FW: We have been warned by counsel that we are in danger and need of Federal protection

Dear Inspector General Horowitz, please add this email to my ongoing case file with DOJ OIG. As this involves further potential dangers to my family, where it has been alleged my father was murdered and a Coroner’s report reveals several elevated heavy metals, I take this warning very seriously, especially where I have uncovered and proven fraud and forgeries of deceased parties to gain Dominion and Control of my deceased father’s estate, the crimes committed by Attorneys at Law. I have been trying to contact the FBI for several months to report several very serious crimes that require federal investigations and have supposedly contacted the FBI who refused to give me names of the people that were supposed to be doing the intake and have not heard back from them at all. I have tried to contact your offices and similarly I was unable to confirm anyone’s name that I was speaking to and if in fact you had gotten my messages. Please feel free to contact me at my numbers below. Eliot
Eliot I. Bernstein
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
2753 N.W. 34th St.
Boca Raton, Florida 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o)
(561) 886.7628 (c)
(561) 245-8644 (f)


NOTICE: Due to Presidential Executive Orders, the National Security Agency may have read this email without warning, warrant, or notice. They may do this without any judicial or legislative oversight and it can happen to ordinary Americans like you and me. You have no recourse nor protection save to vote against any incumbent endorsing such unlawful acts.
This message and any attachments are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. SS 2510-2521.
This e-mail message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message or call (561) 245-8588. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.
*The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this “Message,” including attachments. The originator intended this Message for the specified recipients only; it may contain the originator’s confidential and proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies unintended recipients that they have received this Message in error, and strictly proscribes their Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Recipients-in-error shall notify the originator immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch.
*Wireless Copyright Notice*. Federal and State laws govern copyrights to this Message. You must have the originator’s full written consent to alter, copy, or use this Message. Originator acknowledges others’ copyrighted content in this Message. Otherwise, Copyright © 2011 by originator Eliot Ivan Bernstein, iviewit@iviewit.tv and www.iviewit.tv. All Rights Reserved.


From: Eliot Bernstein [mailto:iviewit5@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 13, 2015 6:57 AM
To: ‘Detective Andrew Panzer @ Palm Beach County Sheriff (PanzerA@pbso.org)’
Subject: Eliot Bernstein. FW: We have been warned by counsel that we are in danger and need of Federal protection

Dear Detective Panzer, please add this to the ongoing investigation of my family estate and trust matters. Barbara Stone is a Florida Attorney who is exposing Judicial Corruption. I got a call at 4am from attorney Candice Schwager who informed me and Candice my wife that our lives and those of our children were in imminent danger for our Whistleblowing efforts. This warning came from a licensed attorney. Paul Wright is at the FBI according to Barbara. I was told to contact state and federal authorities for protection. Eliot

From: barbara stone [mailto:bstone575@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, April 12, 2015 7:36 PM
To: Paul Wright
Cc: Eliot Bernstein; Candice Schwager, Esq.; JoAnne M Denison, Esq.
Subject: We have been warned by counsel that we are in danger and need of Federal protection

My attorney, Candice Schwager who is also the attorney for Eliot Bernstein contacted both of us on or about 4:00 am EST on Saturday and advised us to contact Federal authorities for protection.

She warned me and Eliot Bernstein that we and our families are in danger and in need of immediate Federal protection due to our efforts to expose judicial corruption.

Ms Schwager is a licensed attorney in the state of Texas and can be reached at 832.315.8489
I can be reached at 305 494 2463 and Mr. Bernstein can be reached at 561 245.8588.
Barbara Stone
on behalf of myself and my mother and on behalf of Eliot Bernstein and his family.



“Google Is Not What It Seems” by Julian Assange

This is Shit and Googles and by the way GoogleShit stinks in their theft of the Iviewit Patents to Create EliotTube.

Google Is Not What It Seems by Julian Assange


Google Chairman Eric Schmidt shares a joke with Hillary Clinton during a special “fireside chat” with Google staff. The talk was held on 21 Jul 2014 at Google’s headquarters in Mountain View, California.



In this extract from his new book When Google Met Wikileaks, WikiLeaks’ publisher Julian Assange describes the special relationship between Google, Hillary Clinton and the State Department — and what that means for the future of the internet. WikiLeaks readers can obtain a 20 percent discount on the cover price when ordering from the OR Books website by using the coupon code “WIKILEAKS”.

* * *

ric Schmidt is an influential figure, even among the parade of powerful characters with whom I have had to cross paths since I founded WikiLeaks. In mid-May 2011 I was under house arrest in rural Norfolk, about three hours’ drive northeast of London. The crackdown against our work was in full swing and every wasted moment seemed like an eternity. It was hard to get my attention. But when my colleague Joseph Farrell told me the executive chairman of Google wanted to make an appointment with me, I was listening.


        In some ways the higher echelons of Google seemed more distant and obscure to me than the halls of Washington. We had been locking horns with senior US officials for years by that point. The mystique had worn off. But the power centers growing up in Silicon Valley were still opaque and I was suddenly conscious of an opportunity to understand and influence what was becoming the most influential company on earth. Schmidt had taken over as CEO of Google in 2001 and built it into an empire.1

        I was intrigued that the mountain would come to Muhammad. But it was not until well after Schmidt and his companions had been and gone that I came to understand who had really visited me.

* * *


        The stated reason for the visit was a book. Schmidt was penning a treatise with Jared Cohen, the director of Google Ideas, an outfit that describes itself as Google’s in-house “think/do tank.” I knew little else about Cohen at the time. In fact, Cohen had moved to Google from the US State Department in 2010. He had been a fast-talking “Generation Y” ideas man at State under two US administrations, a courtier from the world of policy think tanks and institutes, poached in his early twenties. He became a senior advisor for Secretaries of State Rice and Clinton. At State, on the Policy Planning Staff, Cohen was soon christened “Condi’s party-starter,” channeling buzzwords from Silicon Valley into US policy circles and producing delightful rhetorical concoctions such as “Public Diplomacy 2.0.”2 On his Council on Foreign Relations adjunct staff page he listed his expertise as “terrorism; radicalization; impact of connection technologies on 21st century statecraft; Iran.”3

Director of Google Ideas, and “geopolitical visionary” Jared Cohen shares his vision with US Army recruits in a lecture theatre at West Point Military Academy on 26 Feb 2014 (Instagram by Eric Schmidt)

        It was Cohen who, while he was still at the Department of State, was said to have emailed Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey to delay scheduled maintenance in order to assist the aborted 2009 uprising in Iran.4 His documented love affair with Google began the same year, when he befriended Eric Schmidt as they together surveyed the post-occupation wreckage of Baghdad. Just months later, Schmidt re-created Cohen’s natural habitat within Google itself by engineering a “think/do tank” based in New York and appointing Cohen as its head. Google Ideas was born.

        Later that year the two co-wrote a policy piece for the Council on Foreign Relations’ journal Foreign Affairs, praising the reformative potential of Silicon Valley technologies as an instrument of US foreign policy.5 Describing what they called “coalitions of the connected,”6 Schmidt and Cohen claimed that

Democratic states that have built coalitions of their militaries have the capacity to do the same with their connection technologies. . . . They offer a new way to exercise the duty to protect citizens around the world [emphasis added].7

        In the same piece they argued that “this technology is overwhelmingly provided by the private sector.” Shortly afterwards, Tunisia. then Egypt, and then the rest of the Middle East, erupted in revolution. The echoes of these events on online social media became a spectacle for Western internet users. The professional commentariat, keen to rationalize uprisings against US-backed dictatorships, branded them “Twitter revolutions.” Suddenly everyone wanted to be at the intersection point between US global power and social media, and Schmidt and Cohen had already staked out the territory. With the working title “The Empire of the Mind,” they began expanding their article to book length, and sought audiences with the big names of global tech and global power as part of their research.

        They said they wanted to interview me. I agreed. A date was set for June.

Eric Schmidt, Chairman of Google, at the “Pulse of Today’s Global Economy” panel talk at the Clinton Global Initiative annual meeting, 26 Sept. 2013 in New York. Eric Schmidt first attended the CGI annual meeting at its opening plenary in 2010. (Photo: Mark Lennihan)


        By the time June came around there was already a lot to talk about. That summer WikiLeaks was still grinding through the release of US diplomatic cables, publishing thousands of them every week. When, seven months earlier, we had first started releasing the cables, Hillary Clinton had denounced the publication as “an attack on the international community” that would “tear at the fabric” of government.

        It was into this ferment that Google projected itself that June, touching down in a London airport and making the long drive up into East Anglia to Norfolk and Beccles. Schmidt arrived first, accompanied by his then partner, Lisa Shields. When he introduced her as a vice president of the Council on Foreign Relations—a US foreign-policy think tank with close ties to the State Department—I thought little more of it. Shields herself was straight out of Camelot, having been spotted by John Kennedy Jr.’s side back in the early 1990s. They sat with me and we exchanged pleasantries. They said they had forgotten their dictaphone, so we used mine. We made an agreement that I would forward them the recording and in exchange they would forward me the transcript, to be corrected for accuracy and clarity. We began. Schmidt plunged in at the deep end, straightaway quizzing me on the organizational and technological underpinnings of WikiLeaks.

        Some time later Jared Cohen arrived. With him was Scott Malcomson, introduced as the book’s editor. Three months after the meeting Malcomson would enter the State Department as the lead speechwriter and principal advisor to Susan Rice (then US ambassador to the United Nations, now national security advisor). He had previously served as a senior advisor at the United Nations, and is a longtime member of the Council on Foreign Relations. At the time of writing, he is the director of communications at the International Crisis Group.8

        At this point, the delegation was one part Google, three parts US foreign-policy establishment, but I was still none the wiser. Handshakes out of the way, we got down to business.

Google’s Chairman, Eric Schmidt, photographed in a New York elevator, carrying Henry Kissinger’s new book, “World Order”, 25 Sep 2014


        Schmidt was a good foil. A late-fiftysomething, squint-eyed behind owlish spectacles, managerially dressed—Schmidt’s dour appearance concealed a machinelike analyticity. His questions often skipped to the heart of the matter, betraying a powerful nonverbal structural intelligence. It was the same intellect that had abstracted software-engineering principles to scale Google into a megacorp, ensuring that the corporate infrastructure always met the rate of growth. This was a person who understood how to build and maintain systems: systems of information and systems of people. My world was new to him, but it was also a world of unfolding human processes, scale, and information flows.

        For a man of systematic intelligence, Schmidt’s politics—such as I could hear from our discussion—were surprisingly conventional, even banal. He grasped structural relationships quickly, but struggled to verbalize many of them, often shoehorning geopolitical subtleties into Silicon Valley marketese or the ossified State Department microlanguage of his companions.9 He was at his best when he was speaking (perhaps without realizing it) as an engineer, breaking down complexities into their orthogonal components.

        I found Cohen a good listener, but a less interesting thinker, possessed of that relentless conviviality that routinely afflicts career generalists and Rhodes scholars. As you would expect from his foreign-policy background, Cohen had a knowledge of international flash points and conflicts and moved rapidly between them, detailing different scenarios to test my assertions. But it sometimes felt as if he was riffing on orthodoxies in a way that was designed to impress his former colleagues in official Washington. Malcomson, older, was more pensive, his input thoughtful and generous. Shields was quiet for much of the conversation, taking notes, humoring the bigger egos around the table while she got on with the real work.

        As the interviewee I was expected to do most of the talking. I sought to guide them into my worldview. To their credit, I consider the interview perhaps the best I have given. I was out of my comfort zone and I liked it. We ate and then took a walk in the grounds, all the while on the record. I asked Eric Schmidt to leak US government information requests to WikiLeaks, and he refused, suddenly nervous, citing the illegality of disclosing Patriot Act requests. And then as the evening came on it was done and they were gone, back to the unreal, remote halls of information empire, and I was left to get back to my work. That was the end of it, or so I thought.

* * *

        Two months later, WikiLeaks’ release of State Department cables was coming to an abrupt end. For three-quarters of a year we had painstakingly managed the publication, pulling in over a hundred global media partners, distributing documents in their regions of influence, and overseeing a worldwide, systematic publication and redaction system, fighting for maximum impact for our sources.

        But in an act of gross negligence the Guardian newspaper—our former partner—had published the confidential decryption password to all 251,000 cables in a chapter heading in its book, rushed out hastily in February 2011.10 By mid-August we discovered that a former German employee—whom I had suspended in 2010—was cultivating business relationships with a variety of organizations and individuals by shopping around the location of the encrypted file, paired with the password’s whereabouts in the book. At the rate the information was spreading, we estimated that within two weeks most intelligence agencies, contractors, and middlemen would have all the cables, but the public would not.

I decided it was necessary to bring forward our publication schedule by four months and contact the State Department to get it on record that we had given them advance warning. The situation would then be harder to spin into another legal or political assault. Unable to raise Louis Susman, then US ambassador to the UK, we tried the front door. WikiLeaks investigations editor Sarah Harrison called the State Department front desk and informed the operator that “Julian Assange” wanted to have a conversation with Hillary Clinton. Predictably, this statement was initially greeted with bureaucratic disbelief. We soon found ourselves in a reenactment of that scene in Dr. Strangelove, where Peter Sellers cold-calls the White House to warn of an impending nuclear war and is immediately put on hold. As in the film, we climbed the hierarchy, speaking to incrementally more superior officials until we reached Clinton’s senior legal advisor. He told us he would call us back. We hung up, and waited.

Sarah Harrison and Julian Assange call the U.S. State Department in September 2011.

          When the phone rang half an hour later, it was not the State Department on the other end of the line. Instead, it was Joseph Farrell, the WikiLeaks staffer who had set up the meeting with Google. He had just received an email from Lisa Shields seeking to confirm that it was indeed WikiLeaks calling the State Department.

        It was at this point that I realized Eric Schmidt might not have been an emissary of Google alone. Whether officially or not, he had been keeping some company that placed him very close to Washington, DC, including a well-documented relationship with President Obama. Not only had Hillary Clinton’s people known that Eric Schmidt’s partner had visited me, but they had also elected to use her as a back channel. While WikiLeaks had been deeply involved in publishing the inner archive of the US State Department, the US State Department had, in effect, snuck into the WikiLeaks command center and hit me up for a free lunch. Two years later, in the wake of his early 2013 visits to China, North Korea, and Burma, it would come to be appreciated that the chairman of Google might be conducting, in one way or another, “back-channel diplomacy” for Washington. But at the time it was a novel thought.11

Eric Schmidt’s Instagram of Hillary Clinton and David Rubinstein, taken at the Holbrooke Forum Gala, 5 Dec 2013. Richard Holbrooke (who died in 2010) was a high-profile US diplomat, managing director of Lehman brothers, a board member of NED, CFR, the Trilateral Commission, the Bilderberg steering group and an advisor to Hillary Clinton and John Kerry. Schmidt donated over $100k to the the Holbrooke Forum

    I put it aside until February 2012, when WikiLeaks—along with over thirty of our international media partners—began publishing the Global Intelligence Files: the internal email spool from the Texas-based private intelligence firm Stratfor.12 One of our stronger investigative partners—the Beirut-based newspaper Al Akhbar—scoured the emails for intelligence on Jared Cohen.13 The people at Stratfor, who liked to think of themselves as a sort of corporate CIA, were acutely conscious of other ventures that they perceived as making inroads into their sector. Google had turned up on their radar. In a series of colorful emails they discussed a pattern of activity conducted by Cohen under the Google Ideas aegis, suggesting what the “do” in “think/do tank” actually means.

        Cohen’s directorate appeared to cross over from public relations and “corporate responsibility” work into active corporate intervention in foreign affairs at a level that is normally reserved for states. Jared Cohen could be wryly named Google’s “director of regime change.” According to the emails, he was trying to plant his fingerprints on some of the major historical events in the contemporary Middle East. He could be placed in Egypt during the revolution, meeting with Wael Ghonim, the Google employee whose arrest and imprisonment hours later would make him a PR-friendly symbol of the uprising in the Western press. Meetings had been planned in Palestine and Turkey, both of which—claimed Stratfor emails—were killed by the senior Google leadership as too risky. Only a few months before he met with me, Cohen was planning a trip to the edge of Iran in Azerbaijan to “engage the Iranian communities closer to the border,” as part of Google Ideas’ project on “repressive societies.” In internal emails Stratfor’s vice president for intelligence, Fred Burton (himself a former State Department security official), wrote,

Google is getting WH [White House] and State Dept support and air cover. In reality they are doing things the CIA cannot do . . . [Cohen] is going to get himself kidnapped or killed. Might be the best thing to happen to expose Google’s covert role in foaming up-risings, to be blunt. The US Gov’t can then disavow knowledge and Google is left holding the shit-bag.14

In further internal communication, Burton said his sources on Cohen’s activities were Marty Lev—Google’s director of security and safety—and Eric Schmidt himself.
15Looking for something more concrete, I began to search in WikiLeaks’ archive for information on Cohen. State Department cables released as part of Cablegate reveal that Cohen had been in Afghanistan in 2009, trying to convince the four major Afghan mobile phone companies to move their antennas onto US military bases.16 In Lebanon he quietly worked to establish an intellectual and clerical rival to Hezbollah, the “Higher Shia League.”17 And in London he offered Bollywood movie executives funds to insert anti-extremist content into their films, and promised to connect them to related networks in Hollywood.18
        Three days after he visited me at Ellingham Hall, Jared Cohen flew to Ireland to direct the “Save Summit,” an event cosponsored by Google Ideas and the Council on Foreign Relations. Gathering former inner-city gang members, right-wing militants, violent nationalists, and “religious extremists” from all over the world together in one place, the event aimed to workshop technological solutions to the problem of “violent extremism.”19 What could go wrong?

        Cohen’s world seems to be one event like this after another: endless soirees for the cross-fertilization of influence between elites and their vassals, under the pious rubric of “civil society.” The received wisdom in advanced capitalist societies is that there still exists an organic “civil society sector” in which institutions form autonomously and come together to manifest the interests and will of citizens. The fable has it that the boundaries of this sector are respected by actors from government and the “private sector,” leaving a safe space for NGOs and nonprofits to advocate for things like human rights, free speech, and accountable government.

        This sounds like a great idea. But if it was ever true, it has not been for decades. Since at least the 1970s, authentic actors like unions and churches have folded under a sustained assault by free-market statism, transforming “civil society” into a buyer’s market for political factions and corporate interests looking to exert influence at arm’s length. The last forty years has seen a huge proliferation of think tanks and political NGOs whose purpose, beneath all the verbiage, is to execute political agendas by proxy.

        It is not just obvious neocon front groups like Foreign Policy Initiative.20 It also includes fatuous Western NGOs like Freedom House, where naïve but well-meaning career nonprofit workers are twisted in knots by political funding streams, denouncing non-Western human rights violations while keeping local abuses firmly in their blind spots. The civil society conference circuit—which flies developing-world activists across the globe hundreds of times a year to bless the unholy union between “government and private stakeholders” at geopoliticized events like the “Stockholm Internet Forum”—simply could not exist if it were not blasted with millions of dollars in political funding annually.
        Scan the memberships of the biggest US think tanks and institutes and the same names keep cropping up. Cohen’s Save Summit went on to seed AVE, or AgainstViolentExtremism.org, a long-term project whose principal backer besides Google Ideas is the Gen Next Foundation. This foundation’s website says it is an “exclusive membership organization and platform for successful individuals” that aims to bring about “social change” driven by venture capital funding.21 Gen Next’s “private sector and non-profit foundation support avoids some of the potential perceived conflicts of interest faced by initiatives funded by governments.”22 Jared Cohen is an executive member.

Jared Cohen on stage with the delegates at the New York City inaugural summit for the Alliance of Youth Movements, in 2008

      Gen Next also backs an NGO, launched by Cohen toward the end of his State Department tenure, for bringing internet-based global “pro-democracy activists” into the US foreign relations patronage network.23 The group originated as the “Alliance of Youth Movements” with an inaugural summit in New York City in 2008 funded by the State Department and encrusted with the logos of corporate sponsors.24 The summit flew in carefully selected social media activists from “problem areas” like Venezuela and Cuba to watch speeches by the Obama campaign’s new-media team and the State Department’s James Glassman, and to network with public relations consultants, “philanthropists,” and US media personalities.25 The outfit held two more invite-only summits in London and Mexico City where the delegates were directly addressed via video link by Hillary Clinton:26

You are the vanguard of a rising generation of citizen activists. . . . And that makes you the kind of leaders we need.27

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton addressing the delegates to the 2009 Alliance of Youth Movements Annual Summit in Mexico City, on 16 Oct 2009, via videolink.


        In 2011, the Alliance of Youth Movements rebranded as “Movements.org.” In 2012 Movements.org became a division of “Advancing Human Rights,” a new NGO set up by Robert L. Bernstein after he resigned from Human Rights Watch (which he had originally founded) because he felt it should not cover Israeli and US human rights abuses.28 Advancing Human Rights aims to right Human Rights Watch’s wrong by focusing exclusively on “dictatorships.”29 Cohen stated that the merger of his Movements.org outfit with Advancing Human Rights was “irresistible,” pointing to the latter’s “phenomenal network of cyberactivists in the Middle East and North Africa.”30 He then joined the Advancing Human Rights board, which also includes Richard Kemp, the former commander of British forces in occupied Afghanistan.31 In its present guise, Movements.org continues to receive funding from Gen Next, as well as from Google, MSNBC, and PR giant Edelman, which represents General Electric, Boeing, and Shell, among others.32

A screen capture of the “Supporters and sponsors” page at movements.org.

        Google Ideas is bigger, but it follows the same game plan. Glance down the speaker lists of its annual invite-only get-togethers, such as “Crisis in a Connected World” in October 2013. Social network theorists and activists give the event a veneer of authenticity, but in truth it boasts a toxic piñata of attendees: US officials, telecom magnates, security consultants, finance capitalists, and foreign-policy tech vultures like Alec Ross (Cohen’s twin at the State Department).33 At the hard core are the arms contractors and career military: active US Cyber Command chieftains, and even the admiral responsible for all US military operations in Latin America from 2006 to 2009. Tying up the package are Jared Cohen and the chairman of Google, Eric Schmidt.34

        I began to think of Schmidt as a brilliant but politically hapless Californian tech billionaire who had been exploited by the very US foreign-policy types he had collected to act as translators between himself and official Washington—a West Coast–East Coast illustration of the principal-agent dilemma.35

        I was wrong.

* * *

        Eric Schmidt was born in Washington, DC, where his father had worked as a professor and economist for the Nixon Treasury. He attended high school in Arlington, Virginia, before graduating with a degree in engineering from Princeton. In 1979 Schmidt headed out West to Berkeley, where he received his PhD before joining Stanford/Berkley spin-off Sun Microsystems in 1983. By the time he left Sun, sixteen years later, he had become part of its executive leadership.

        Sun had significant contracts with the US government, but it was not until he was in Utah as CEO of Novell that records show Schmidt strategically engaging Washington’s overt political class. Federal campaign finance records show that on January 6, 1999, Schmidt donated two lots of $1,000 to the Republican senator for Utah, Orrin Hatch. On the same day Schmidt’s wife, Wendy, is also listed giving two lots of $1,000 to Senator Hatch. By the start of 2001 over a dozen other politicians and PACs, including Al Gore, George W. Bush, Dianne Feinstein, and Hillary Clinton, were on the Schmidts’ payroll, in one case for $100,000.36 By 2013, Eric Schmidt—who had become publicly over-associated with the Obama White House—was more politic. Eight Republicans and eight Democrats were directly funded, as were two PACs. That April, $32,300 went to the National Republican Senatorial Committee. A month later the same amount, $32,300, headed off to the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee. Why Schmidt was donating exactly the same amount of money to both parties is a $64,600 question.37
        It was also in 1999 that Schmidt joined the board of a Washington, DC–based group: the New America Foundation, a merger of well-connected centrist forces (in DC terms). The foundation and its 100 staff serves as an influence mill, using its network of approved national security, foreign policy, and technology pundits to place hundreds of articles and op-eds per year. By 2008 Schmidt had become chairman of its board of directors. As of 2013 the New America Foundation’s principal funders (each contributing over $1 million) are listed as Eric and Wendy Schmidt, the US State Department, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Secondary funders include Google, USAID, and Radio Free Asia.38
        Schmidt’s involvement in the New America Foundation places him firmly in the Washington establishment nexus. The foundation’s other board members, seven of whom also list themselves as members of the Council on Foreign Relations, include Francis Fukuyama, one of the intellectual fathers of the neoconservative movement; Rita Hauser, who served on the President’s Intelligence Advisory Board under both Bush and Obama; Jonathan Soros, the son of George Soros; Walter Russell Mead, a US security strategist and editor of the American Interest;Helene Gayle, who sits on the boards of Coca-Cola, Colgate-Palmolive, the Rockefeller Foundation, the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Policy Unit, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Center for Strategic and International Studies, the White House Fellows program, and Bono’s ONE Campaign; and Daniel Yergin, oil geostrategist, former chair of the US Department of Energy’s Task Force on Strategic Energy Research, and author of The Prize: The Epic Quest for Oil, Money and Power.39

Google Chairman Eric Schmidt introduces Hillary Clinton as the keynote speaker at the 16 May 2014 conference “Big Ideas for a New America” for the New America Foundation, of which Schmidt is the Chair of the Board and the largest funder.

The chief executive of the foundation, appointed in 2013, is Jared Cohen’s former boss at the State Department’s Policy Planning Staff, Anne-Marie Slaughter, a Princeton law and international relations wonk with an eye for revolving doors.40 She is everywhere at the time of writing, issuing calls for Obama to respond to the Ukraine crisis not only by deploying covert US forces into the country but also by dropping bombs on Syria—on the basis that this will send a message to Russia and China.41 Along with Schmidt, she is a 2013 attendee of the Bilderberg conference and sits on the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Policy Board.42

        There was nothing politically hapless about Eric Schmidt. I had been too eager to see a politically unambitious Silicon Valley engineer, a relic of the good old days of computer science graduate culture on the West Coast. But that is not the sort of person who attends the Bilderberg conference four years running, who pays regular visits to the White House, or who delivers “fireside chats” at the World Economic Forum in Davos.43 Schmidt’s emergence as Google’s “foreign minister”—making pomp and ceremony state visits across geopolitical fault lines—had not come out of nowhere; it had been presaged by years of assimilation within US establishment networks of reputation and influence.

        On a personal level, Schmidt and Cohen are perfectly likable people. But Google’s chairman is a classic “head of industry” player, with all of the ideological baggage that comes with that role.44 Schmidt fits exactly where he is: the point where the centrist, liberal, and imperialist tendencies meet in American political life. By all appearances, Google’s bosses genuinely believe in the civilizing power of enlightened multinational corporations, and they see this mission as continuous with the shaping of the world according to the better judgment of the “benevolent superpower.” They will tell you that open-mindedness is a virtue, but all perspectives that challenge the exceptionalist drive at the heart of American foreign policy will remain invisible to them. This is the impenetrable banality of “don’t be evil.” They believe that they are doing good. And that is a problem.

* * *

        Google is “different”. Google is “visionary”. Google is “the future”. Google is “more than just a company”. Google “gives back to the community”. Google is “a force for good”.

        Even when Google airs its corporate ambivalence publicly, it does little to dislodge these items of faith.45 The company’s reputation is seemingly unassailable. Google’s colorful, playful logo is imprinted on human retinas just under six billion times each day, 2.1 trillion times a year—an opportunity for respondent conditioning enjoyed by no other company in history.46 Caught red-handed last year making petabytes of personal data available to the US intelligence community through the PRISM program, Google nevertheless continues to coast on the goodwill generated by its “don’t be evil” doublespeak. A few symbolic open letters to the White House later and it seems all is forgiven. Even anti-surveillance campaigners cannot help themselves, at once condemning government spying but trying to alter Google’s invasive surveillance practices using appeasement strategies.47
        Nobody wants to acknowledge that Google has grown big and bad. But it has. Schmidt’s tenure as CEO saw Google integrate with the shadiest of US power structures as it expanded into a geographically invasive megacorporation. But Google has always been comfortable with this proximity. Long before company founders Larry Page and Sergey Brin hired Schmidt in 2001, their initial research upon which Google was based had been partly funded by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA).48 And even as Schmidt’s Google developed an image as the overly friendly giant of global tech, it was building a close relationship with the intelligence community.
        In 2003 the US National Security Agency (NSA) had already started systematically violating the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) under its director General Michael Hayden.49 These were the days of the “Total Information Awareness” program.50 Before PRISM was ever dreamed of, under orders from the Bush White House the NSA was already aiming to “collect it all, sniff it all, know it all, process it all, exploit it all.”51 During the same period, Google—whose publicly declared corporate mission is to collect and “organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful”52was accepting NSA money to the tune of $2 million to provide the agency with search tools for its rapidly accreting hoard of stolen knowledge.53
        In 2004, after taking over Keyhole, a mapping tech startup cofunded by the National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency (NGA) and the CIA, Google developed the technology into Google Maps, an enterprise version of which it has since shopped to the Pentagon and associated federal and state agencies on multimillion-dollar contracts.54 In 2008, Google helped launch an NGA spy satellite, the GeoEye-1, into space. Google shares the photographs from the satellite with the US military and intelligence communities.55 In 2010, NGA awarded Google a $27 million contract for “geospatial visualization services.”56
        In 2010, after the Chinese government was accused of hacking Google, the company entered into a “formal information-sharing” relationship with the NSA, which was said to allow NSA analysts to “evaluate vulnerabilities” in Google’s hardware and software.57 Although the exact contours of the deal have never been disclosed, the NSA brought in other government agencies to help, including the FBI and the Department of Homeland Security.
        Around the same time, Google was becoming involved in a program known as the “Enduring Security Framework”58 (ESF), which entailed the sharing of information between Silicon Valley tech companies and Pentagon-affiliated agencies “at network speed.”59 Emails obtained in 2014 under Freedom of Information requests show Schmidt and his fellow Googler Sergey Brin corresponding on first-name terms with NSA chief General Keith Alexander about ESF.60 Reportage on the emails focused on the familiarity in the correspondence: “General Keith . . . so great to see you . . . !” Schmidt wrote. But most reports overlooked a crucial detail. “Your insights as a key member of the Defense Industrial Base,” Alexander wrote to Brin, “are valuable to ensure ESF’s efforts have measurable impact.”
        The Department of Homeland Security defines the Defense Industrial Base as “the worldwide industrial complex that enables research and development, as well as design, production, delivery, and maintenance of military weapons systems, subsystems, and components or parts, to meet U.S. military requirements [emphasis added].”61

Google Chairman Eric Schmidt’s Instagram video from 2 May 2014, showing an experimental US military troop support drone, the LS3, or “Cujo”, designed by Boston Dynamics, newly acquired by Google

        The Defense Industrial Base provides “products and services that are essential to mobilize, deploy, and sustain military operations.” Does it include regular commercial services purchased by the US military? No. The definition specifically excludes the purchase of regular commercial services. Whatever makes Google a “key member of the Defense Industrial Base,” it is not recruitment campaigns pushed out through Google AdWords or soldiers checking their Gmail.

       In 2012, Google arrived on the list of top-spending Washington, DC, lobbyists—a list typically stalked exclusively by the US Chamber of Commerce, military contractors, and the petrocarbon leviathans.62 Google entered the rankings above military aerospace giant Lockheed Martin, with a total of $18.2 million spent in 2012 to Lockheed’s $15.3 million. Boeing, the military contractor that absorbed McDonnell Douglas in 1997, also came below Google, at $15.6 million spent, as did Northrop Grumman at $17.5 million.

        In Autumn 2013 the Obama administration was trying to drum up support for US airstrikes against Syria. Despite setbacks, the administration continued to press for military action well into September with speeches and public announcements by both President Obama and Secretary of State John Kerry.63 On September 10, Google lent its front page—the most popular on the internet—to the war effort, inserting a line below the search box reading “Live! Secretary Kerry answers questions on Syria. Today via Hangout at 2pm ET.”64


Google’s front page on 10 Sep 2013, promoting the Obama administration’s efforts to bomb Syria

        As the self-described “radical centrist”65New York Times columnist Tom Friedman wrote in 1999, sometimes it is not enough to leave the global dominance of American tech corporations to something as mercurial as “the free market”:

The hidden hand of the market will never work without a hidden fist. McDonald’s cannot flourish without McDonnell Douglas, the designer of the F-15. And the hidden fist that keeps the world safe for Silicon Valley’s technologies to flourish is called the US Army, Air Force, Navy and Marine Corps.66

        If anything has changed since those words were written, it is that Silicon Valley has grown restless with that passive role, aspiring instead to adorn the “hidden fist” like a velvet glove. Writing in 2013, Schmidt and Cohen stated,

What Lockheed Martin was to the twentieth century, technology and cyber-security companies will be to the twenty-first.67

This was one of many bold assertions made by Schmidt and Cohen in their book, which was eventually published in April 2013. Gone was the working title, “The Empire of the Mind”, replaced with “The New Digital Age: Reshaping the Future of People, Nations and Business”. By the time it came out, I had formally sought and received political asylum from the government of Ecuador, and taken refuge in its embassy in London. At that point I had already spent nearly a year in the embassy under police surveillance, blocked from safe passage out of the UK. Online I noticed the press hum excitedly about Schmidt and Cohen’s book, giddily ignoring the explicit digital imperialism of the title and the conspicuous string of pre-publication endorsements from famous warmongers like Tony Blair, Henry Kissinger, Bill Hayden and Madeleine Albright on the back.

Google’s Chairman Eric Schmidt and Henry Kissinger, Secretary of State and National Security Council head under President Richard Nixon, during a “fireside chat” with Google staff at the company’s headquarters in Mountain View, California, on 30 Sep 2013. In the talk, Kissinger says National Security Agency whistleblower Edward Snowden is “despicible”.


        Billed as a visionary forecast of global technological change, the book failed to deliver—failed even to imagine a future, good or bad, substantially different to the present. The book was a simplistic fusion of Fukuyama “end of history” ideology—out of vogue since the 1990s—and faster mobile phones. It was padded out with DC shibboleths, State Department orthodoxies, and fawning grabs from Henry Kissinger. The scholarship was poor—even degenerate. It did not seem to fit the profile of Schmidt, that sharp, quiet man in my living room. But reading on I began to see that the book was not a serious attempt at future history. It was a love song from Google to official Washington. Google, a burgeoning digital superstate, was offering to be Washington’s geopolitical visionary.

        One way of looking at it is that it’s just business. For an American internet services monopoly to ensure global market dominance it cannot simply keep doing what it is doing, and let politics take care of itself. American strategic and economic hegemony becomes a vital pillar of its market dominance. What’s a megacorp to do? If it wants to straddle the world, it must become part of the original “don’t be evil” empire.

        But part of the resilient image of Google as “more than just a company” comes from the perception that it does not act like a big, bad corporation. Its penchant for luring people into its services trap with gigabytes of “free storage” produces the perception that Google is giving it away for free, acting directly contrary to the corporate profit motive. Google is perceived as an essentially philanthropic enterprise—a magical engine presided over by otherworldly visionaries—for creating a utopian future.68 The company has at times appeared anxious to cultivate this image, pouring funding into “corporate responsibility” initiatives to produce “social change”—exemplified by Google Ideas. But as Google Ideas shows, the company’s “philanthropic” efforts, too, bring it uncomfortably close to the imperial side of US influence. If Blackwater/Xe Services/Academi was running a program like Google Ideas, it would draw intense critical scrutiny.69 But somehow Google gets a free pass.
        Whether it is being just a company or “more than just a company,” Google’s geopolitical aspirations are firmly enmeshed within the foreign-policy agenda of the world’s largest superpower. As Google’s search and internet service monopoly grows, and as it enlarges its industrial surveillance cone to cover the majority of the world’s population, rapidly dominating the mobile phone market and racing to extend internet access in the global south, Google is steadily becoming the internet for many people.70 Its influence on the choices and behavior of the totality of individual human beings translates to real power to influence the course of history.
        If the future of the internet is to be Google, that should be of serious concern to people all over the world—in Latin America, East and Southeast Asia, the Indian subcontinent, the Middle East, sub-Saharan Africa, the former Soviet Union, and even in Europe—for whom the internet embodies the promise of an alternative to US cultural, economic, and strategic hegemony.71

A “don’t be evil” empire is still an empire.

This has been an extract from Julian Assange’s new book When Google Met Wikileaks, available from OR Books. WikiLeaks readers can obtain a 20 percent discount on the cover price when ordering from the OR Books website by using the coupon code “WIKILEAKS”. For reprint rights inquiries, contact rights [at] orbooks.com


1 The company is now valued at $400 billion and employs 49,829 people. The valuation at the end of 2011 was $200 billion with 33,077 employees. See “Investor Relations: 2012 Financial Tables,” Google, archive.today/Iux4M. For the first quarter of 2014, see “Investor Relations: 2014 Financial Tables,” Google, archive.today/35IeZ.

2 For a strong essay on Schmidt and Cohen’s book that discusses similar themes, and that provoked some of the research for this book, see Joseph L Flatley, “Being cynical: Julian Assange, Eric Schmidt, and the year’s weirdest book,” Verge, 7 June 2013, archive.today/gfLEr.

3 Jared Cohen’s profile on the Council on Foreign Relations website, archive.today/pkgQN.

4 Shawn Donnan, “Think again,” Financial Times, 8 July 2011, archive.today/ndbmj. See also Rick Schmitt, “Diplomacy 2.0,” Stanford Alumni, May/June 2011, archive.today/Kidpc.

5 Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen, “The Digital Disruption: Connectivity and the Diffusion of Power,” Foreign Affairs, November /December 2010, archive.today/R13l2.

6 “Coalitions of the connected” is a phrase apparently designed to resonate with the “coalition of the willing,” which was used to designate the 2003 US-led alliance of states preparing to invade Iraq without UN Security Council approval.

7 The phrase “duty to protect” is redolent of “responsibility to protect,” or, in its abbreviated form, “R2P.” R2P is a highly controversial “emerging norm” in international law. R2P leverages human rights discourse to mandate “humanitarian intervention” by “the international community” in countries where the civilian population is deemed to be at risk. For US liberals who eschew the naked imperialism of Paul Wolfowitz (on which see Patrick E. Tyler, “U.S. strategy plan calls for insuring no rivals develop,” New York Times, 8 March 1992, archive.today/Rin1g), R2P is the justification of choice for Western military action in the Middle East and elsewhere, as evidenced by its ubiquity in the push to invade Libya in 2011 and Syria in 2013. Jared Cohen’s former superior at the US State Department, Anne-Marie Slaughter, has called it “the most important shift in our conception of sovereignty since the Treaty of Westphalia in 1648.” See her praise for the book Responsibility to Protect: The Global Moral Compact for the 21st Century, edited by Richard H. Cooper and Juliette Voïnov Kohler,on the website of the publisher Palgrave Macmillan, archive.today/0dmMq.

For a critical essay on R2P see Noam Chomsky’s statement on the doctrine to the UN General Assembly. Noam Chomsky, “Statement by Professor Noam Chomsky to the United Nations General Assembly Thematic Dialogue on Responsibility to Protect,” United Nations, New York, 23 July 2009, is.gd/bLx3uU.

See also “Responsibility to protect: An idea whose time has come—and gone?” Economist, 23 July 2009, archive.today/K2WZJ.

8 The International Crisis Group bills itself as an “independent, non-profit, non-governmental organization” that works “through field-based analysis and high-level advocacy to prevent and resolve deadly conflict.” It has also been described as a “high-level think tank . . . [devised] primarily to provide policy guidance to governments involved in the NATO-led reshaping of the Balkans.” See Michael Barker, “Imperial Crusaders For Global Governance,” Swans Commentary, 20 April 2009, archive.today/b8G3o.

Malcomson’s International Crisis Group staff profile is available from www.crisisgroup.org, archive.today/ETYXp.

9 One might argue that this is living proof of the weak Sapir-Whorf hypothesis. See “Linguistic Relativity,” Wikipedia, archive.today/QXJPx.

10 Glenn Greenwald, “Fact and myths in the WikiLeaks/Guardian saga,” Salon, 2 September 2011, archive.today/5KLJH.

See also Matt Giuca, “WikiLeaks password leak FAQ,” Unspecified Behaviour, 3 September 2011, archive.today/ylPUp.

See also “WikiLeaks: Why the Guardian is wrong and shouldn’t have published the password,” Matt’s Tumblr, 1 September 2011, archive.today/aWjj4.

11 Andrew Jacobs, “Visit by Google Chairman May Benefit North Korea,” New York Times, 10 January 2013, archive.today/bXrQ2.

12 Jeremy Hammond, a brave and principled young digital revolutionary, was later accused by the US government of ferreting these documents out and giving them to WikiLeaks. He is now a political prisoner in the US, sentenced to ten years after speaking to an FBI informer.

13 Yazan al-Saadi, “StratforLeaks: Google Ideas Director Involved in ‘Regime Change,’” Al Akhbar, 14 March 2012, archive.today/gHMzq.

 “Re: GOOGLE & Iran ** internal use only—pls do not forward **,” email ID 1121800 (27 February 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 14 March 2012, archive.today/sjxuG.

For more internal Stratfor discussions about Jared Cohen and Google, see:

Egypt – Google ** Suggest you read,” email ID 1122191 (9 February 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 14 March 2012, archive.today/DCzlA.

“Re: More on Cohen,” email ID 1629270 (9 February 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 14 March 2012, archive.today/opQ3a.

“Re: Google Shitstorm Moving to Gaza (internal use only),” email ID 1111729 (10 February 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 14 March 2012, archive.today/vpK3F.

“Re: Google’s Cohen Activist Role,” email ID 1123044 (10 February 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 11 March 2013, archive.today/nvFP6.

“Re: movements.org founder Cohen,” email ID 1113596 (11 February 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 6 March 2012, archive.today/ToYjC.

“Re: discussion: who is next?,” email ID 1113965 (11 February 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 14 March 2012, archive.today/ofBMr.

“GOOGLE Loose Canon Bound for Turkey & UAE (SENSITIVE – DO NOT FORWARD),” email ID 1164190 (10 March 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 14 March 2012, archive.today/Jpy4F.

“Re: [alpha] GOOGLE – Cohen & Hosting of Terrorists,” email ID 1133861 (22 March 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 14 March 2012, archive.today/OCR78.

“[alpha] Jared Cohen (GOOGLE),” email ID 1160182 (30 March 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 14 March 2012, archive.today/FYQYe.

For these emails and more, see the collection of sources at when.google.met.wikileaks.org.

15 “Re: GOOGLE’s Jared Cohen update,” email ID 398679 (14 February 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 14 March 2012, archive.today/IoFw4.

This email is included in the collection of sources at when.google.met.wikileaks.org.

16 “Using connection technologies to promote US strategic interests in Afghanistan: mobile banking, telecommunications insurance, and co-location of cell phone towers,” canonical ID: 09KABUL2020_a, Public Library of US Diplomacy, WikiLeaks, archive.today/loAlC.

This cable is included in the collection of sources at when.google.met.wikileaks.org.

In May 2014, WikiLeaks revealed that the NSA had gained access to all Afghan mobile phone calls and was recording all of them for later retrieval. See “WikiLeaks statement on the mass recording of Afghan telephone calls by the NSA,” WikiLeaks, 23 May 2014, archive.today/lp6Pl.

17 From the Public Library of US Diplomacy, WikiLeaks, see cables with canonical IDs: 07BEIRUT1944_a, 08BEIRUT910_a, 08BEIRUT912_a, 08BEIRUT918_a, 08BEIRUT919_a, 08BEIRUT1389_a, and 09BEIRUT234_a. Collection available at: archive.today/34MyI.

See also the collection of sources at when.google.met.wikileaks.org.

18 “EUR senior advisor Pandith and s/p advisor Cohen’s visit to the UK, October 9-14, 2007,” canonical ID: 07LONDON4045_a, Public Library of US Diplomacy, WikiLeaks, archive.today/mxXGQ.

For more on Jared Cohen from the WikiLeaks archives see archive.today/5fVm2.

See also the collection of sources at when.google.met.wikileaks.org.

19 See “Summit Against Violent Extremism (SAVE)” on the Council on Foreign Relations website, archive.today/rA1tA.

20 For an insight into Foreign Policy Initiative, see Max Blumenthal, Rania Khalek, “How Cold War–Hungry Neocons Stage Managed RT Anchor Liz Wahl’s Resignation,” Truthdig, 19 March 2014, archive.today/JSUHq.

21 “About GNF,” Gen Next Foundation website, archive.today/p91bd.

22 “AgainstViolentExtremism.org,” Gen Next Foundation website, archive.today/Rhdtf.

23 “Movements.org,” Gen Next Foundation website, archive.today/oVlqH.

Note this extract from a confidential report of a March 2011 meeting between Stratfor and the “main organizer” of Movements.org: “How Movements.org got started: [This part is not for publication] in 2008 it became apparent to the USG that they needed to do public diplomacy over the internet. So Jared Cohen was at DoS then and played a major role in starting the organization. The main goal was just spreading the good word about the US.” “[alpha] INSIGHT- US/MENA- Movements.org,” email ID 1356429 (29 March 2011), Global Intelligence Files, WikiLeaks, 4 March 2013, archive.today/PgQji.

See also the collection of sources at when.google.met.wikileaks.org.

24 For more on this event see Joseph L Flatley, “Being cynical: Julian Assange, Eric Schmidt, and the year’s weirdest book,” Verge, 7 June 2013, archive.today/gfLEr.

See also “The Summit: New York City, The 2008 Inaugural Alliance of Youth Movements Summit,” Movements.org website, archive.today/H2Ox1#2008.

See the logos of the corporate sponsors at “About movements.org,” Movements.org website, archive.today/DQo19.

25 “Attendee Biographies, 3-5 December 2008, New York City,” Alliance of Youth Movements, is.gd/bLOVxT.

See also “09 Summit, Attendee Biographies, 14-16 October 2009, Mexico City,” Alliance of Youth Movements, is.gd/MddXp7.

See also “Attendee Biographies, 9-11 March 2010, London,” Movements.org, is.gd/dHTVit.

26 “The Summit: London, The 2010 Alliance For Youth Movements Summit,” Movements.org website, archive.today/H2Ox1#2010.

And “The Summit: Mexico City, The 2009 Alliance of Youth Movements Summit,” Movements.org website, archive.today/H2Ox1#2009.

27 Hillary Rodham Clinton, “Secretary Clinton’s Video Message for Alliance of Youth Movements Summit,” US Department of State, 16 October 2009, archive.today/I2x6U.

See also Hillary Rodham Clinton, “Remarks At TecMilenio University,” US Department of State, 26 March 2009, archive.today/49ACj.

28 Scott Shane, “Groups to Help Online Activists in Authoritarian Countries,” New York Times, 11 June 2012, archive.today/jqq9U.

29 “Mission Statement,” Advancing Human Rights website, archive.today/kBzYe.

Scott Shane, “Groups to Help Online Activists in Authoritarian Countries,” New York Times, 11 June 2012, archive.today/jqq9U.

30 Ibid.

31 “People,” Advancing Human Rights website, archive.today/pXmPk.

32 Edelman is famous for a series of astroturfing campaigns for Big Tobacco and Walmart. The Sourcewatch.org page on Edelman, which is worth reading in full, has a section on Edelman’s strategy toward co-opting the nongovernmental sector: “Edelman PR tells clients that activists are winning because ‘they play offense all the time; they take their message to the consumer; they are ingenious at building coalitions; they always have a clear agenda; they move at Internet speed; they speak in the media’s tone.’ The solution, it argues, are partnerships between NGOs and business. ‘Our experience to date is positive,’ they say, citing examples such as ‘Chiquita-Rainforest Alliance’ and ‘Home Depot-Forest Stewardship Council.’” See “Daniel J. Edelman, Inc.,” SourceWatch website, archive.today/APbOf.

For the sponsors of Movements.org, see “About movements.org,” Movements.org website, archive.today/NMkOy.

33 For an example of Alec Ross’s writing, see Alec Ross, Ben Scott, “Social media: power to the people?” NATO Review, 2011, archive.today/L6sb3.

34 “Speakers,” Conflict in a Connected World website, archive.today/Ed8rA.

35 The “principal-agent problem” or “agency dilemma” is where the initiating party, the principal, tasks an accepting party, the agent, to act on his or her behalf, but where the interests of the two parties are not sufficiently aligned and the agent uses his or her position to exploit the principal. A lawyer who makes decisions that are in the lawyer’s, but not the client’s, interests is a classic example.

36 “PAC” stands for “Political Action Committee,” a campaign-funding pool often used to obscure support for particular politicians, to sidestep campaign-finance regulations, or to campaign on a particular issue.

37 All political donation figures sourced from OpenSecrets.org (opensecrets.org/indivs) and the US Federal Election Commission (fec.gov/finance/disclosure/norindsea.shtml). See the results listed for Eric Schmidt on the Federal Election Commission website, archive.today/yjXoi.

See also a screenshot of the results listed for Eric and Wendy Schmidt on the Open Secrets website, archive.today/o6hiB.

38 “Our Funding,” New America Foundation website, archive.today/3FnFm.

39 Francis Fukuyama profile on the New America Foundation website: archive.today/6ZKk5.

Rita E. Hauser profile on the New America Foundation website: archive.today/oAvJf.

Jonathan Soros profile on the New America Foundation website: archive.today/lTJy9.

Walter Russell Mead profile on the New America Foundation website: archive.today/APejM.

Helene D. Gayle profile on the New America Foundation website: archive.today/72plM.

Daniel Yergin profile on the New America Foundation website: archive.today/kQ4ys.

See the full board of directors on the New America Foundation website: archive.today/iBvgl.

40 Anne-Marie Slaughter profile on the New America Foundation website: archive.today/yIoLP.

41 “The solution to the crisis in Ukraine lies in part in Syria. It is time for US President Barack Obama to demonstrate that he can order the offensive use of force in circumstances other than secret drone attacks or covert operations. The result will change the strategic calculus not only in Damascus, but also in Moscow, not to mention Beijing and Tokyo.” Anne-Marie Slaughter, “Stopping Russia Starts in Syria,” Project Syndicate, 23 April 2014, archive.today/GiLng.

Jared Cohen has retweeted approval for Slaughter on the issue. For example, he shared a supportive tweet on 26 April 2014 that claimed that the argument in the article quoted above was “spot on.” archive.today/qLyxo.

42 On the Bilderberg conference see Matthew Holehouse, “Bilderberg Group 2013: guest list and agenda,” Telegraph, 6 June 2013, archive.today/PeJGc.

On the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Policy Board, see the list of current board members on the US Department of State website: archive.today/Why8v.

43 Attendee lists for Bilderberg conferences since 2010 are available from the Bilderberg website: www.bilderbergmeetings.org. Eric Schmidt was photographed at Bilderberg 2014 in Copenhagen, meeting with Viviane Reding, the EU Commissioner for Justice, and Alex Karp, the CEO of Palantir Technologies, an intelligence data-mining company which sells search and data integration services to clients in the US law enforcement and intelligence community, and which was launched with funding from the CIA’s venture capital fund, In-Q-Tel. See Charlie Skelton, “Bilderberg conference 2014: eating our politicians for breakfast,” Guardian, 30 May 2014, archive.today/pUY5b.

In 2011, Palantir was involved in the HBGary scandal, having been exposed as part of a group of contractors proposing to take down WikiLeaks. For more on this, see “Background on US v. WikiLeaks” in When Google Met WikiLeaks.See also Andy Greenberg, Ryan Mac, “How A ‘Deviant’ Philosopher Built Palantir, A CIA-Funded Data-Mining Juggernaut,” Forbes, 2 September 2013, archive.today/ozAZ8.

White House visitor records are available from its website, archive.today/QFQx0.

For coverage of Schmidt at the World Economic Forum see Emily Young, “Davos 2014: Google’s Schmidt warning on jobs,” BBC, 23 January 2014, archive.today/jGl7B.

See also Larry Elliott, “Davos debates income inequality but still invites tax avoiders,” Guardian, 19 January 2014, archive.today/IR767.

44 Adrianne Jeffries, “Google’s Eric Schmidt: ‘let us celebrate capitalism,’” Verge, 7 March 2014, archive.today/gZepE.

45 For an example of Google’s corporate ambivalence on the issue of privacy see Richard Esguerra, “Google CEO Eric Schmidt Dismisses the Importance of Privacy,” Electronic Frontier Foundation, 10 December 2009, archive.today/rwyQ7.

46 Figures correct as of 2013. See “Google Annual Search Statistics,” Statistic Brain (Statistic Brain Research Institute), 1 January 2014, archive.today/W7DgX.

47 There is an uncomfortable willingness among privacy campaigners to discriminate against mass surveillance conducted by the state to the exclusion of similar surveillance conducted for profit by large corporations. Partially, this is a vestigial ethic from the Californian libertarian origins of online pro-privacy campaigning. Partially, it is a symptom of the superior public relations enjoyed by Silicon Valley technology corporations, and the fact that those corporations also provide the bulk of private funding for the flagship digital privacy advocacy groups, leading to a conflict of interest.

At the individual level, many of even the most committed privacy campaigners have an unacknowledged addiction to easy-to-use, privacy-destroying amenities like Gmail, Facebook and Apple products. As a result, privacy campaigners frequently overlook corporate surveillance abuses. When they do address the abuses of companies like Google, campaigners tend to appeal to the logic of the market, urging companies to make small concessions to user privacy in order to repair their approval ratings. There is the false assumption that market forces ensure that Silicon Valley is a natural government antagonist, and that it wants to be on the public’s side—that profit-driven multinational corporations partake more of the spirit of democracy than government agencies.

Many privacy advocates justify a predominant focus on abuses by the state on the basis that the state enjoys a monopoly on coercive force. For example, Edward Snowden was reported to have said that tech companies do not “put warheads on foreheads.” See Barton Gellman, “Edward Snowden, after months of NSA revelations, says his mission’s accomplished,” Washington Post, 23 December 2013, archive.today/d6P8q.

This view downplays the fact that powerful corporations are part of the nexus of power around the state, and that they enjoy the ability to deploy its coercive power, just as the state often exerts its influence through the agency of powerful corporations. The movement to abolish privacy is twin-horned. Privacy advocates who focus exclusively on one of those horns will find themselves gored on the other.

48 See section 7, Acknowledgments, in The Anatomy of a Large-Scale Hypertextual Web Search Engine, Sergey Brin, Lawrence Page (Computer Science Department, Stanford University, 1998): “The research described here was conducted as part of the Stanford Integrated Digital Library Project, supported by the National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement IRI-9411306. Funding for this cooperative agreement is also provided by DARPA and NASA, and by Interval Research, and the industrial partners of the Stanford Digital Libraries Project,” archive.today/tb5VL.

49 Michael Hayden is now with the Chertoff Group, a consultancy firm which describes itself as a “premier security and risk management advisory firm.” It was founded and is chaired by Michael Chertoff, who was the former secretary of the Department of Homeland Security under President George W. Bush. See Marcus Baram, “Fear Pays: Chertoff, Ex-Security Officials Slammed For Cashing In On Government Experience,” Huffington Post, 23 November 2010, updated 25 May 2011, archive.today/iaM1b.

50 “Total Information Awareness” was a radical post-9/11 US intelligence program under the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency to surveil and gather detailed information about individuals in order to anticipate their behavior. The program was officially discontinued in 2003 after public outcry, but its legacy can arguably be seen in recent disclosures on bulk spying by the National Security Agency. See Shane Harris, “Giving In to the Surveillance State,” New York Times, 22 August 2012, archive.today/v4zNm.

51 “The Munk Debate on State Surveillance: Edward Snowden Video” (video), Munk Debates, archive.today/zOj0t.

See also Jane Mayer, “The Secret Sharer: Is Thomas Drake an enemy of the state?” New Yorker, 23 May 2011, archive.today/pXoy9.

52 “Company overview,” Google company website, archive.today/JavDC.

53 Lost in the Cloud: Google and the US Government (report), Consumer Watchdog’s Inside Google, January 2011, bit.ly/1qNoHQ9.

See also Verne Kopytoff, “Google has lots to do with intelligence,” San Francisco Chronicle, 30 March 2008, archive.today/VNEJi.

See also Yasha Levine, “Oakland emails give another glimpse into the Google-Military-Surveillance Complex,” Pando Daily, 7 March 2014, archive.today/W35WU.

See also Yasha Levine, “Emails showing Google’s closeness with the NSA Director really aren’t that surprising,” Pando Daily, 13 May 2014, archive.today/GRT18.

Yasha Levine has written a number of investigative articles on Google’s ties to the military and intelligence industry, which can be browsed at: pando.com/author/ylevine.

54 Yasha Levine, “Oakland emails give another glimpse into the Google-Military-Surveillance Complex,” Pando Daily, 7 March 2014, archive.today/W35WU.

For more on Google’s ties to the CIA, see Noah Shachtman, “Exclusive: Google, CIA Invest in ‘Future’ of Web Monitoring,” Wired, 28 July 2010, archive.today/e0LNL.

55 Yasha Levine, “Oakland emails give another glimpse into the Google-Military-Surveillance Complex,” Pando Daily, 7 March 2014, archive.today/W35WU.

56 Ibid.

57 Ellen Nakashima, “Google to enlist NSA to help it ward off cyberattacks,” Washington Post, 4 February 2010, archive.today/hVTVl.

58 The official name for US military occupation of Afghanistan is similar: “Operation Enduring Freedom.” See “Infinite Justice, out—Enduring Freedom, in,” BBC, 25 September 2001, archive.today/f0fp7.

59 Jason Leopold, “Exclusive: emails reveal close Google relationship with NSA,” Al Jazeera America, 6 May 2014, archive.today/V0fdG

60 Ibid.

61 “Defense Industrial Base Sector,” on the US Homeland Security website: archive.today/Y7Z23.

62 See “Top Spenders” under “Influence and Lobbying” on the OpenSecrets.org website: archive.today/xQyui.

See also Tom Hamburger, “Google, once disdainful of lobbying, now a master of Washington influence,” Washington Post, 13 April 2014, archive.today/oil7k.

63 Sy Hersh has written two articles about the Obama administration’s ill-fated case for “intervention” in Syria. See Seymour M. Hersh, “Whose Sarin?” London Review of Books, 19 December 2013, archive.today/THPGh.

See also Seymour M. Hersh, “The Red Line and the Rat Line,” London Review of Books, 17 April 2014, archive.today/qp5jB.

64 An archive snapshot of the page can be found at archive.today/Q6uq8. Google explicitly prides itself on keeping its front page free of all interference. Its purity and sacredness are incorporated into Google’s corporate manifesto: “Our homepage interface is clear and simple, and pages load instantly. Placement in search results is never sold to anyone, and advertising is not only clearly marked as such, it offers relevant content and is not distracting.” See “Ten things we know to be true,” Google company website, archive.today/s7v9B.

On the rare occasions Google adds a single line to the search page to plug its own projects, like the Chrome browser, that choice itself becomes news. See Cade Metz, “Google smears Chrome on ‘sacred’ home page,” Register, 9 September 2008, archive.today/kfneV.

See also Hayley Tsukayama, “Google advertises Nexus 7 on home page,” Washington Post, 28 August 2012, archive.today/QYfBV.

65 Thomas Friedman has published several columns extolling the virtues of his “radical centrism,” such as “Make Way for the Radical Center,” New York Times, 23 July 2011, archive.today/IZzhb.

66 Thomas Friedman, “A Manifesto for the Fast World,” New York Times, 28 March 1999, archive.today/aQHvy.

67 Eric Schmidt and Jared Cohen, The New Digital Age, British paperback edition (John Murray, 2013), p. 98.

Google is committing to this ambition. Since the beginning of 2013, Google has bought nine experimental robotics and artificial intelligence companies and put them to work towards an undeclared goal under Andy Rubin, the former-head of Google’s Android division. See John Markoff, “Google Puts Money on Robots, Using the Man Behind Android,” New York Times, 4 December 2013, archive.today/Izr7B.

See also Adam Clark Estes, “Meet Google’s Robot Army. It’s Growing,” Gizmodo, 27 January 2014, archive.today/mN2GF.

Two of Google’s acquisitions are leading competitors in the DARPA Robotics Challenge, a competition held by the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, with lavish Pentagon funding support for competitors. Schaft Inc, a Japanese company, is tipped to triumph at the DARPA competition with its entry—a bipedal, human-like robot that can climb stairs, open doors, traverse rubble, and is impervious to radiation. The other company, Boston Dynamics, specializes in producing running, walking, and crawling military robots for the Department of Defense. The most well known of Boston Dynamics’ robots is “BigDog”—a horse-sized troop support carrier, which must be seen (on YouTube: is.gd/xOYFdY) to be believed. See Breezy Smoak, “Google’s Schaft robot wins DARPA rescue challenge,” Electronic Products, 23 December 2013, archive.today/M7L6a.

See also John Markoff, “Google Adds to Its Menagerie of Robots,” New York Times, 14 December 2013, archive.today/cqBX4.

Google’s real power as a drone company is its unrivalled collection of navigational data. This includes all the information associated with Google Maps and the locations of around a billion people. Once gathered, it should not be assumed that this data will always be used for benign purposes. The mapping data gathered by the Google Street View project, which sent cars rolling down streets all over the world, may one day be instrumental for navigating military or police robots down those same streets.

68 A utopianism occasionally bordering on megalomania. Google CEO Larry Page, for example, has publicly conjured the image of Jurassic Park-like Google microstates where Google is exempt from national laws and can pursue progress unimpeded. “The laws . . . can’t be right if it’s 50 years old; that’s before the internet. . . . Maybe we could set apart a piece of the world. . . . An environment where people can try new things. I think as technologists we should have some safe places where we can try out new things and figure out the effect on society—what’s the effect on people?—without having to deploy it to the whole world.” See Sean Gallagher, “Larry Page wants you to stop worrying and let him fix the world,” Ars Technica, 20 May 2013, archive.today/kHYcB.

69 The notorious mercenary security company Blackwater, best known for killing Iraqi civilians, was renamed Xe Services in 2009 and then Academi in 2011. See Jeremy Scahill, Blackwater: The Rise of the World’s Most Powerful Mercenary Army, (Nation Books, 2007).

70 Historically Google’s success was built on the commercial surveillance of civilians through “services”: web search, email, social networking, et cetera. But Google’s development in recent years has seen it expand its surveillance enterprise by controlling mobile phones and tablets. The success of Google’s mobile operating system, Android, launched in 2008, has given Google an 80 percent share of the smartphone market. Google claims that over a billion Android devices have registered themselves, at a rate now of more than a million new devices a day. See “Q1 2014 Smartphone OS Results: Android Dominates High Growth Developing Markets,” ABIresearch, 6 May 2014, archive.today/cTeRY.

See also “Android, the world’s most popular mobile platform,” on the Android Developers website: archive.today/5y8oe.

Through Android, Google controls devices people carry on their daily routine and use to connect to the internet. Each device feeds back usage statistics, location, and other data to Google. This gives the company unprecedented power to surveil and influence the activities of its user base, both over the network and as they go about their lives. Other Google projects such as “Project Glass” and “Project Tango” aim to build on Android’s ubiquity, extending Google’s surveillance capabilities farther into the space around their users. See Jay Yarow, “This Chart Shows Google’s Incredible Domination Of The World’s Computing Platforms,” Business Insider, 28 March 2014, archive.today/BTDJJ.

See also Yasha Levine, “Surveillance Valley has put a billion bugs in a billion pockets,” Pando Daily, 7 February 2014, archive.today/TA7sq.

See also Jacob Kastrenakes, “Google announces Project Tango, a smartphone that can map the world around it,” Verge, 20 February 2014, archive.today/XLLvc.

See also Edward Champion, “Thirty-Five Arguments Against Google Glass,” Reluctant Habits, 14 March 2013, archive.today/UUJ4n.

Google is also aiming to become an internet access provider. Google’s “Project Loon” aims to provide internet access to populations in the global south using wireless access points mounted on fleets of high-altitude balloons and aerial drones, having acquired the drone companies Titan Aerospace and Makani Power. Facebook, which bid against Google for Titan Aerospace, has similar aspirations, having acquired the UK-based aerial drone company Ascenta. See Adi Robertson, “Google X ‘moonshots lab’ buys flying wind turbine company Makani Power,” Verge, 22 May 2013, archive.today/gsnio.

See also the Project Loon website: archive.today/4ok7L.

See also Sean Hollister, “Google nabs drone company Facebook allegedly wanted to buy,” Verge, 14 April 2014, archive.today/hc0kr.

71 For an example of European concern, see Mathias Döpfner, “Why we fear Google,” Frankfurter Allgemeine, 17 April 2014, archive.today/LTL6l.

Re: “U.S. Department of Justice Claims No Due Process for Self-Represented | Pennsylvania Courtwatch”

This is Bullshit that the DOJ says Pro Se Litigants have no rights!!!

From: George McDermott
Sent: Wednesday, April 8, 2015 9:16 PM
To: Federal Lawsuit
Subject: Re: U.S. Department of Justice Claims No Due Process for Self-Represented | Pennsylvania Courtwatch



http://www.iviewit.tv/THE MARYLAND GEN 4-7-15.docx

http://www.iviewit.tv/March 2 Justice.pdf

http://www.iviewit.tv/Jurisdiction and Laws Postal Inspectors enforce more than 200 federal laws in investigations of crimes that may adversely affect or fraudulently use the U.pdf

This is a perfect example of mail fraud and failure to provide honest services by Justice Department employees subverting our Constitution and rule of law.

I have 800 examples of corruption in the court on my  website http://www.secretjustice.com/and my  website http://occupythelaw.com/ . This person needs to be removed we need everyone to send a letter to the hand of the United States Postal Service asking for a criminal investigation into his office and his personal activities as a Department of Justice alleged employee. The statements are inconsistent with the Constitution of all the states as well as the Constitution and declaration of rights of our government under title V title 15 and title 28 of the United States code as well as title 42 unbelievable give me a call if you get a chance 301-996-9577 see attachments

my name is George McDermott I been fighting judicial corruption for 20 years if you visit secret justice.com you’ll see that are 800 programs plus at that website not one government agency is stepped up to the plate. No one can file a criminal complaint against a judge. In 20 years I’ve asked for the impeachment indictment of 69+ state and federal judges as video will attest to. The FBI has no jurisdiction over white-collar fraud, or victims rights the US Justice Department has no jurisdiction over white-collar fraud or judicial terrorism by court insiders, homeland security won’t even talk to a victim with one from the land of the free and the homes of brave to the land of the scam in the home of the fraud for the benefit of the unincorporated Association the American Bar Association hell-bent on destroying this nation with forge documents insiders such as the Justice Department 20 who wrote this outrageous statement that pro se litigants surrender their rights when representing themselves as portion.

If they don’t do their job and perform honest services fire every Justice Department employees who belongs the American Bar Association as they are not entitled to hold office under the 13th amendment titles and nobility clause.

Here are the program titles if you’re interested
748- L March 18, 2015. At the direction of the Sheriff’s Department serving documents on the warden of the Queen Anne’s County detention center. Notifying the warden that prisoner Richard Reinheimer is being illegally detained as no court order exist as of 4:30 PM on the 18th day of March 2015. In the records of Queen in County Circuit Court. Notice of appeal was filed to agents of the warden’s office. Who were also informed that The International Human Rights Tribunal. Is investigating the deprivation of human rights of citizens of Queen Anne County. By Sheriff departments and courts working in consort with foreclosure mill and kingpin lawyers from the BWW Law Group promoting foreclosure fraud to the court’s.
748- M March 19 10:30 AM attempting to serve papers on BW W law group
quiet title action. Filed by victim Richard Reinheimer.
748- N Arriving the offices BWW Law Group LLC Tom Reinheimer and server George McDermott making a record that the victim Richard Reinheimer is placed a quiet title on the subject property BWW Law Group LLC. Through its agents Carry Ward. Have filed false claims against in violation of international human rights laws.
748- O March 19, 2015 leaving the offices of BWW Law Group LLC. After serving legal papers on its agents Carry Ward. Which were received by her lawful agent who attested to the same in a handwritten note shown in this video.
748- P Tom Reinheimer receives call from England from Richard’s sister requesting update on Richard’s condition and concerns about his lack of access to medicines which could prevent a heart attack and or death,
748- Q Tom Reinheimer on phone with fellow in the national human rights defender. Explaining how the courts have falsely incarcerated his brother. Who as video will attest to this video and the recorded conversation of Richard Reinheimer incarcerated in Queen Anne’s County detention Center. Will both verify that Richard Reinheimer has given a power of attorney to his brother Tom Reinheimer regarding matters and filing notice of appeal and other papers in in efforts to gain his release from the false imprisonment. In Queen Anne’s County Maryland by fictitious judges, false unsigned orders, and criminal misconduct of Sheriff’s office.
748- R INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER George McDermott returned certificate of service an affidavit to the Queen Anne’s County Circuit Court clerk’s office. Where once again judge Thomas Ross has interfered with Richard Reinheimer’s legal and constitutional rights by issuing yet another order prohibiting the court clerks from accepting any more pleadings from George McDermott. Yet another violation of his oath of office both as a sham judge and as a member of the corporate Bar Association. Who has rules of professional conduct and standards of professional responsibility judge Ross and others are disrespecting.
748- S Delivering court papers to the Sheriff’s office after date stamping informing the Sheriff’s office that yet another quiet title action has been filed. And if the Sheriff moves forward with the purported eviction March 23 – 24, 2015 knowing that arrest warrant had been issued by the international tribunal on human rights against this officer for failure to prevent, and aiding and abetting and false imprisonment.
478- T INTERNATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS DEFENDER/NEWS Reporter delivering copies of court papers as directed by Sheriff Hoffman’s office, to the warden at the Queen Anne’s County criminal detention center. After visiting shares Department and court. All of whom are acting outside of the law denying victims human rights.
748- U Making a record that agents of the warden had excepted filing papers for falsely imprisoned Richard Rexford Reinheimer, as of 5 PM March 19, 2015 all parties have been put on notice. Their actions are in violation of international human rights laws and rules 1+12+15. Which United States Corporate Government is a signature party to and must obey including all of its corporate entities therein. And yet the judges of Queen Anne’s County Maryland, proclaim they’re not subject to jurisdiction.
749 – A Road trip to Annapolis Maryland March 20, 2015 discovering that the court of special appeals office is not acting in good faith and filing all the pleadings of Richard Reinheimer. Court was served a notice to intervene to prevent an injustice and additional frauds on the court by judge Thomas Ross and judge Sidney Campen. Due to their false imprisonment and threats against the Reinheimer family prohibited under title 18 of the United States criminal code 18 USC 1512 and 1513.
749 – B March 20, 2015. Arriving at the Reinheimer home where preparations have been made to auction off all their life long positions. Because of the criminal misconduct of judge Ross and judge Sidney Campen. Along with the clerk of the court and County Sheriff Brian Hoffman all of whom had a duty to prevent and swore an oath of office which they willfully disregarded along with the state’s attorney’s and his prosecutor both engage in prosecutorial misconduct and false imprisonment.
750 – A Emergency road trip to Baltimore Maryland to US District Court March 20, 2015 to file for emergency writ of habeas corpus. Based on the fact that judge ever dance and leg offered the memorandum of opinion about point of law that Maryland judges are not entitled to stay on the bench after the age of 70. Or be appointed after the age of 70. The two judges have falsely imprisoned Richard Reinheimer even know judge camping is not even a judge anymore. He’s a pretend fictitious judge who is a private citizen and will be sued as such.

US Atty.’s office assistant US Atty. refuses to give his name, his ID number taken complaint or allow victim’s to even assert claims against corrupt judges and lawyers. Of course he himself is a member of this private Association known as the American Bar Association. And divesting our citizens of our rights liberties and properties under color of law and authority.
751 – B Meeting with Cpl. Michael W Harris US postal police. Regarding filing of a report as a victim of the court’s sending out unsigned orders. And failing to provide originals as required under the Constitution and common-law Maryland. Maybe the postal criminal investigation unit will finally take action. As the Supreme Court record of the United States has 300 copies of unsigned orders in case 10 – 10236. Which son walk Clark dismissed with yet another unsigned order. This is a clear-CASE of extortion by mail. Extortion (18 USC 873, 876 & 877)

On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:11 PM, Federal Lawsuit <federallawsuit5@gmail.com> wrote:
This is the most improper letter I’ve ever seen coming from someone at the Justice Dept. It might need a good lawsuit being filed in federal court to clear up.


Specifically, where the letter says “As you know, when you chose to represent yourself, you waived your right to due process, including any access to the courts.”

Well, in all my years of studying federal law, I never saw any statute or court ruling which says someone acting pro se has less rights or less access to the courts. This is preposterous and totally incorrect. On the contrary, countless federal court rulings have granted pro se people all the rights of a real attorney for their cases, which are actually more rights than the average person has in court. For example, like a lawyer, a pro se person can enter the judge’s chambers when called, while the average person cannot.

Unless the statements in that letter are referring to something the recipient previously did where he signed away some right or another within a contract or legal document. But if the statement in that letter is saying anyone acting pro se waives their right to due process, including any access to the courts, then a federal lawsuit should be filed immediately to countermand the statement in that letter.


Tim, Senior Investigator
The Protection Group




On Sat, Apr 4, 2015 at 6:43 PM, Eliot Ivan Bernstein <iviewit3@gmail.com> wrote:



” A Modest Proposal…” by Jonathan Swift 1729

This is NOT BULLSHIT, this is what we have become.  eb

Sent: Tuesday, April 7, 2015 9:59 PM

To: JoAnne M. Denison; Tim NASGA; Probate Sharks; Nasga Us; J. Ditkowsky; Matt Senator Kirk; Eric Holder; FBI- ( (; Chicago FBI; BILL DITKOWSKY; ComplaintAdmin ADA (CRT); Chicago Tribune; SUNTIMES; Janet Phelan; Ginny Johnson; Bev Cooper; FOX News Network LLC; Diane Nash; Cook County States Attorney; Scott Evans; ISBA Main Discussion Group; Glenda Martinez; Edward Carter; Barbara Stone

Subject: A modest proposal -

A Modest Proposal

For Preventing The Children of Poor People in Ireland

From Being Aburden to Their Parents or Country, and

For Making Them Beneficial to The Public

By Jonathan Swift (1729)

It is a melancholy object to those who walk through this great town or travel in the country, when they see the streets, the roads, and cabin doors, crowded with beggars of the female sex, followed by three, four, or six children, all in rags and importuning every passenger for an alms. These mothers, instead of being able to work for their honest livelihood, are forced to employ all their time in strolling to beg sustenance for their helpless infants: who as they grow up either turn thieves for want of work, or leave their dear native country to fight for the Pretender in Spain, or sell themselves to the Barbadoes.

I think it is agreed by all parties that this prodigious number of children in the arms, or on the backs, or at the heels of their mothers, and frequently of their fathers, is in the present deplorable state of the kingdom a very great additional grievance; and, therefore, whoever could find out a fair, cheap, and easy method of making these children sound, useful members of the commonwealth, would deserve so well of the public as to have his statue set up for a preserver of the nation.

But my intention is very far from being confined to provide only for the children of professed beggars; it is of a much greater extent, and shall take in the whole number of infants at a certain age who are born of parents in effect as little able to support them as those who demand our charity in the streets.

”I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled …”

As to my own part, having turned my thoughts for many years upon this important subject, and maturely weighed the several schemes of other projectors, I have always found them grossly mistaken in the computation. It is true, a child just dropped from its dam may be supported by her milk for a solar year, with little other nourishment; at most not above the value of 2s., which the mother may certainly get, or the value in scraps, by her lawful occupation of begging; and it is exactly at one year old that I propose to provide for them in such a manner as instead of being a charge upon their parents or the parish, or wanting food and raiment for the rest of their lives, they shall on the contrary contribute to the feeding, and partly to the clothing, of many thousands.

There is likewise another great advantage in my scheme, that it will prevent those voluntary abortions, and that horrid practice of women murdering their bastard children, alas! too frequent among us! sacrificing the poor innocent babes I doubt more to avoid the expense than the shame, which would move tears and pity in the most savage and inhuman breast.

The number of souls in this kingdom being usually reckoned one million and a half, of these I calculate there may be about two hundred thousand couple whose wives are breeders; from which number I subtract thirty thousand couples who are able to maintain their own children, although I apprehend there cannot be so many, under the present distresses of the kingdom; but this being granted, there will remain an hundred and seventy thousand breeders. I again subtract fifty thousand for those women who miscarry, or whose children die by accident or disease within the year. There only remains one hundred and twenty thousand children of poor parents annually born. The question therefore is, how this number shall be reared and provided for, which, as I have already said, under the present situation of affairs, is utterly impossible by all the methods hitherto proposed. For we can neither employ them in handicraft or agriculture; we neither build houses (I mean in the country) nor cultivate land: they can very seldom pick up a livelihood by stealing, till they arrive at six years old, except where they are of towardly parts, although I confess they learn the rudiments much earlier, during which time, they can however be properly looked upon only as probationers, as I have been informed by a principal gentleman in the county of Cavan, who protested to me that he never knew above one or two instances under the age of six, even in a part of the kingdom so renowned for the quickest proficiency in that art.

I am assured by our merchants, that a boy or a girl before twelve years old is no salable commodity; and even when they come to this age they will not yield above three pounds, or three pounds and half-a-crown at most on the exchange; which cannot turn to account either to the parents or kingdom, the charge of nutriment and rags having been at least four times that value.

I shall now therefore humbly propose my own thoughts, which I hope will not be liable to the least objection.

I have been assured by a very knowing American of my acquaintance in London, that a young healthy child well nursed is at a year old a most delicious, nourishing, and wholesome food, whether stewed, roasted, baked, or boiled; and I make no doubt that it will equally serve in a fricassee or a ragout.

I do therefore humbly offer it to public consideration that of the hundred and twenty thousand children already computed, twenty thousand may be reserved for breed, whereof only one-fourth part to be males; which is more than we allow to sheep, black cattle or swine; and my reason is, that these children are seldom the fruits of marriage, a circumstance not much regarded by our savages, therefore one male will be sufficient to serve four females. That the remaining hundred thousand may, at a year old, be offered in the sale to the persons of quality and fortune through the kingdom; always advising the mother to let them suck plentifully in the last month, so as to render them plump and fat for a good table. A child will make two dishes at an entertainment for friends; and when the family dines alone, the fore or hind quarter will make a reasonable dish, and seasoned with a little pepper or salt will be very good boiled on the fourth day, especially in winter.

I have reckoned upon a medium that a child just born will weigh 12 pounds, and in a solar year, if tolerably nursed, increaseth to 28 pounds.

I grant this food will be somewhat dear, and therefore very proper for landlords, who, as they have already devoured most of the parents, seem to have the best title to the children.

Infant’s flesh will be in season throughout the year, but more plentiful in March, and a little before and after; for we are told by a grave author, an eminent French physician, that fish being a prolific diet, there are more children born in Roman Catholic countries about nine months after Lent than at any other season; therefore, reckoning a year after Lent, the markets will be more glutted than usual, because the number of popish infants is at least three to one in this kingdom: and therefore it will have one other collateral advantage, by lessening the number of papists among us.

I have already computed the charge of nursing a beggar’s child (in which list I reckon all cottagers, laborers, and four-fifths of the farmers) to be about two shillings per annum, rags included; and I believe no gentleman would repine to give ten shillings for the carcass of a good fat child, which, as I have said, will make four dishes of excellent nutritive meat, when he hath only some particular friend or his own family to dine with him. Thus the squire will learn to be a good landlord, and grow popular among his tenants; the mother will have eight shillings net profit, and be fit for work till she produces another child.

Those who are more thrifty (as I must confess the times require) may flay the carcass; the skin of which artificially dressed will make admirable gloves for ladies, and summer boots for fine gentlemen.

As to our city of Dublin, shambles may be appointed for this purpose in the most convenient parts of it, and butchers we may be assured will not be wanting; although I rather recommend buying the children alive, and dressing them hot from the knife, as we do roasting pigs.

A very worthy person, a true lover of his country, and whose virtues I highly esteem, was lately pleased in discoursing on this matter to offer a refinement upon my scheme. He said that many gentlemen of this kingdom, having of late destroyed their deer, he conceived that the want of venison might be well supplied by the bodies of young lads and maidens, not exceeding fourteen years of age nor under twelve; so great a number of both sexes in every country being now ready to starve for want of work and service; and these to be disposed of by their parents, if alive, or otherwise by their nearest relations. But with due deference to so excellent a friend and so deserving a patriot, I cannot be altogether in his sentiments; for as to the males, my American acquaintance assured me, from frequent experience, that their flesh was generally tough and lean, like that of our schoolboys by continual exercise, and their taste disagreeable; and to fatten them would not answer the charge. Then as to the females, it would, I think, with humble submission be a loss to the public, because they soon would become breeders themselves; and besides, it is not improbable that some scrupulous people might be apt to censure such a practice (although indeed very unjustly), as a little bordering upon cruelty; which, I confess, hath always been with me the strongest objection against any project, however so well intended.

But in order to justify my friend, he confessed that this expedient was put into his head by the famous Psalmanazar, a native of the island Formosa, who came from thence to London above twenty years ago, and in conversation told my friend, that in his country when any young person happened to be put to death, the executioner sold the carcass to persons of quality as a prime dainty; and that in his time the body of a plump girl of fifteen, who was crucified for an attempt to poison the emperor, was sold to his imperial majesty’s prime minister of state, and other great mandarins of the court, in joints from the gibbet, at four hundred crowns. Neither indeed can I deny, that if the same use were made of several plump young girls in this town, who without one single groat to their fortunes cannot stir abroad without a chair, and appear at playhouse and assemblies in foreign fineries which they never will pay for, the kingdom would not be the worse.

Some persons of a desponding spirit are in great concern about that vast number of poor people, who are aged, diseased, or maimed, and I have been desired to employ my thoughts what course may be taken to ease the nation of so grievous an encumbrance. But I am not in the least pain upon that matter, because it is very well known that they are every day dying and rotting by cold and famine, and filth and vermin, as fast as can be reasonably expected. And as to the young laborers, they are now in as hopeful a condition; they cannot get work, and consequently pine away for want of nourishment, to a degree that if at any time they are accidentally hired to common labor, they have not strength to perform it; and thus the country and themselves are happily delivered from the evils to come.

I have too long digressed, and therefore shall return to my subject. I think the advantages by the proposal which I have made are obvious and many, as well as of the highest importance.

For first, as I have already observed, it would greatly lessen the number of papists, with whom we are yearly overrun, being the principal breeders of the nation as well as our most dangerous enemies; and who stay at home on purpose with a design to deliver the kingdom to the Pretender, hoping to take their advantage by the absence of so many good protestants, who have chosen rather to leave their country than stay at home and pay tithes against their conscience to an episcopal curate.

Secondly, The poorer tenants will have something valuable of their own, which by law may be made liable to distress and help to pay their landlord’s rent, their corn and cattle being already seized, and money a thing unknown.

Thirdly, Whereas the maintenance of an hundred thousand children, from two years old and upward, cannot be computed at less than ten shillings a-piece per annum, the nation’s stock will be thereby increased fifty thousand pounds per annum, beside the profit of a new dish introduced to the tables of all gentlemen of fortune in the kingdom who have any refinement in taste. And the money will circulate among ourselves, the goods being entirely of our own growth and manufacture.

Fourthly, The constant breeders, beside the gain of eight shillings sterling per annum by the sale of their children, will be rid of the charge of maintaining them after the first year.

Fifthly, This food would likewise bring great custom to taverns; where the vintners will certainly be so prudent as to procure the best receipts for dressing it to perfection, and consequently have their houses frequented by all the fine gentlemen, who justly value themselves upon their knowledge in good eating: and a skilful cook, who understands how to oblige his guests, will contrive to make it as expensive as they please.

Sixthly, This would be a great inducement to marriage, which all wise nations have either encouraged by rewards or enforced by laws and penalties. It would increase the care and tenderness of mothers toward their children, when they were sure of a settlement for life to the poor babes, provided in some sort by the public, to their annual profit instead of expense. We should see an honest emulation among the married women, which of them could bring the fattest child to the market. Men would become as fond of their wives during the time of their pregnancy as they are now of their mares in foal, their cows in calf, their sows when they are ready to farrow; nor offer to beat or kick them (as is too frequent a practice) for fear of a miscarriage.

Many other advantages might be enumerated. For instance, the addition of some thousand carcasses in our exportation of barreled beef, the propagation of swine’s flesh, and improvement in the art of making good bacon, so much wanted among us by the great destruction of pigs, too frequent at our tables; which are no way comparable in taste or magnificence to a well-grown, fat, yearling child, which roasted whole will make a considerable figure at a lord mayor’s feast or any other public entertainment. But this and many others I omit, being studious of brevity.

Supposing that one thousand families in this city, would be constant customers for infants flesh, besides others who might have it at merry meetings, particularly at weddings and christenings, I compute that Dublin would take off annually about twenty thousand carcasses; and the rest of the kingdom (where probably they will be sold somewhat cheaper) the remaining eighty thousand.

I can think of no one objection, that will possibly be raised against this proposal, unless it should be urged, that the number of people will be thereby much lessened in the kingdom. This I freely own, and ’twas indeed one principal design in offering it to the world. I desire the reader will observe, that I calculate my remedy for this one individual Kingdom of Ireland, and for no other that ever was, is, or, I think, ever can be upon Earth. Therefore let no man talk to me of other expedients: Of taxing our absentees at five shillings a pound: Of using neither cloaths, nor houshold furniture, except what is of our own growth and manufacture: Of utterly rejecting the materials and instruments that promote foreign luxury: Of curing the expensiveness of pride, vanity, idleness, and gaming in our women: Of introducing a vein of parsimony, prudence and temperance: Of learning to love our country, wherein we differ even from Laplanders, and the inhabitants of Topinamboo: Of quitting our animosities and factions, nor acting any longer like the Jews, who were murdering one another at the very moment their city was taken: Of being a little cautious not to sell our country and consciences for nothing: Of teaching landlords to have at least one degree of mercy towards their tenants. Lastly, of putting a spirit of honesty, industry, and skill into our shop-keepers, who, if a resolution could now be taken to buy only our native goods, would immediately unite to cheat and exact upon us in the price, the measure, and the goodness, nor could ever yet be brought to make one fair proposal of just dealing, though often and earnestly invited to it.

Therefore I repeat, let no man talk to me of these and the like expedients, ’till he hath at least some glympse of hope, that there will ever be some hearty and sincere attempt to put them into practice.

But, as to my self, having been wearied out for many years with offering vain, idle, visionary thoughts, and at length utterly despairing of success, I fortunately fell upon this proposal, which, as it is wholly new, so it hath something solid and real, of no expence and little trouble, full in our own power, and whereby we can incur no danger in disobliging England. For this kind of commodity will not bear exportation, and flesh being of too tender a consistence, to admit a long continuance in salt, although perhaps I could name a country, which would be glad to eat up our whole nation without it.

After all, I am not so violently bent upon my own opinion as to reject any offer proposed by wise men, which shall be found equally innocent, cheap, easy, and effectual. But before something of that kind shall be advanced in contradiction to my scheme, and offering a better, I desire the author or authors will be pleased maturely to consider two points. First, as things now stand, how they will be able to find food and raiment for an hundred thousand useless mouths and backs. And secondly, there being a round million of creatures in human figure throughout this kingdom, whose whole subsistence put into a common stock would leave them in debt two millions of pounds sterling, adding those who are beggars by profession to the bulk of farmers, cottagers, and laborers, with their wives and children who are beggars in effect: I desire those politicians who dislike my overture, and may perhaps be so bold as to attempt an answer, that they will first ask the parents of these mortals, whether they would not at this day think it a great happiness to have been sold for food, at a year old in the manner I prescribe, and thereby have avoided such a perpetual scene of misfortunes as they have since gone through by the oppression of landlords, the impossibility of paying rent without money or trade, the want of common sustenance, with neither house nor clothes to cover them from the inclemencies of the weather, and the most inevitable prospect of entailing the like or greater miseries upon their breed for ever.

I profess, in the sincerity of my heart, that I have not the least personal interest in endeavoring to promote this necessary work, having no other motive than the public good of my country, by advancing our trade, providing for infants, relieving the poor, and giving some pleasure to the rich. I have no children by which I can propose to get a single penny; the youngest being nine years old, and my wife past child-bearing.

The End


Note: Jonathan Swift (1667-1745), author and satirist, famous for Gulliver’s Travels (1726) and A Modest Proposal (1729). This proposal, where he suggests that the Irish eat their own children, is one of his most drastic pieces. He devoted much of his writing to the struggle for Ireland against the English hegemony.

Ken Ditkowsky