The Rise & Fall of Intel Corporation ( NASDAQ: INTC ). Competition Case Update 2nd Notice of Intel Network SEC Violations Ref# HO-1248999. Similar allegations as Ivieiwt inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Trillion Dollar Lawsuit, Intel named as key Defendant. Complaints filed with DOJ Eric Holder, VP Joe Biden, SEC Mary Shapiro implicating Intel in RICO with Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, AOL, Inc. ( NYSE: AOL ) & more. Read all about it @ www.iviewit.tv .
Blog Post by Real True and Honest Investigative Reporter/Blogger/Whistleblower & Revealer of Light Crystal C. Cox @
http://www.ceopaulotellini.com/2010/09/statement-from-mike-bruzzone-ftc-ta.html
http://Proof Of Intel Cartel – RICO Proof
Proof Of Intel Cartel – RICO Proof -
Full Screen Link
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/document-preview.aspx?doc_id=51737284
Intel FTC – Intel FTC 9341 – Intel Corp. Fraud
Ceo Paul Otellini – Paul Otellini – Paul S. Otellini Intel Corp. is Corrupt – Intel is a Cartel – Intel is a Super Power and in Intel Nation – You Lose !!!! ~ Blog Owned by
Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox
SEC COMPLAINT INTEL CORPORATION
SEC Galleon, Intel Capital Complaint Click Here
Correspondence with D. Bruce Sewell, Barrett and Paul Otellini – They KNEW
Blog Owned By Crystal L. Cox Industry Whistleblower as Part of Exposing to You the Story on the Iviewit Stolen Patent and Defense of ALL who have been Beaten down and Taken Advantage of By Billion Dollar Tech Companies Above the Law.
Major Shareholder Fraud – Mary Schapiro – SEC Complaint
to Mary Schapiro and the SEC
Regarding Intel, Warner Bros,
Jeffrey Bewkes, Lockheed Martin,
Foley and Lardner, Proskauer Rose,
Kenneth Rubenstein, Christopher C. Wheeler,
the USPTO, Sony, SGI, Bankruptcy Courts,
Time Warner, Intel Corp, Time Inc.,
Wayne Smith of Warner, Douglas Chey,
John Calkins, P. Stephen Lamont,
the New York Attorney General,
NY Supreme Court, Florida Supreme Court,
the US Patent Office, IBM,
CEO Paul Otellini of Intel Corp., the Florida Attorney Bar,
the New York Attorney Bar, Michael Grebe,
the Bradley Foundation and a whole lot More.
Tuesday, September 7, 2010
http://Proof Of Intel Cartel – RICO Proof
Statement From Mike Bruzzone FTC TA Operating in Civic Service Capacity. Intel Docket 9341
“” September 7, 2010
To: Crystal L. Cox
Investigative Blogger
Fm: Mike Bruzzone
Camp Marketing
FTC TA Operating in Civic Service Capacity
Re: FTC v Intel Docket 9341 Public Comment
Nation Interest Publication version 3.12
Here’s my FTC v Intel 9341 public comment.
You may have noticed Intel, and the Intel Communications herd, quickly followed August 4, 2010 FTC announcement of finalizing 9341 Proposed consent agreement . . . as the confirmed settlement.
Which of course is not true pending Commissioner public comment review, and then potential ratification of proposed consent agreement in all or part. I believe the consent agreement will be accepted in part and denied in part.
Honest, even for me from industry, I have never witnessed Intel comms spreading so much disinformation so quickly on August 4.
Also believe Senate and Congressional Committee’s on Commerce are watching this outcome; as a potential regulatory breakdown. We’ll get to see just how with it, or out of it, Wash DC is with this outcome. We know it bad . . . but can it show worse?
If the proposal is not accepted . . . that is a hopeful indicator toward governance & regulatory fiduciary responsibility
Obviously the FTC had a hand in this misrepresented settlement pitch. A little premature for Chairman Leibowtiz, Counsel Brill and Bureau of Competition Director Feinstein to be swept up with Intel Network to position the matter as settled . . . when in fact settlement is pending Commissioner ratification and they all know this . . .
There’s an FTC video of the August 4 proposed consent agreement press conference . . . and oh was that an Intel celebration.
Perhaps the Chairman is a little bite more cunning?
Perhaps Intel Network and comms herd are about to experience a severe conceptual discontinuity; Commissioner non acceptance of consent order as proposed.
That would be fateful twist. And I would think spark the legitimate press to lead in legitimate counterpoint response.
Mike Bruzzone
Summary Overview of 9341 proposed consent agreement; attached in full:
That entering into Bureau of Competition Docket 9341 proposed consent agreement with Intel Corporation would enable continued monopolization and non address of standing violations of Federal Law including antitrust, commerce and trade, racketeering, penal and securities law by the Federal Trade Commission.
Proposed consent agreement should be partially accepted for plaintiff sales relief and partially denied for antitrust omissions. Chartered to act under the laws of the Unites States Bureau of Competition Docket 9341 negotiated settlement proposal in current form is insufficient on antitrust environmental circumstances of fact, discovery, law precedent and Commission fiduciary responsibilities.
And should be sent back to the negotiating table where the future of democratic capitalism and civil society are truly at stake. We cannot overlook all the major Intel Network System crimes or the fiduciary and governance breakdowns which proposed order omits.
Including seven of the most hideous system crime categories;
1) Vertical by horizontal tying.
2) Intel multiple laterals of combination.
3) Intel tied charge through channels metering devices.
4) Intel Corporate plus Media tied sales attraction.
5) Network political & jurist multipoint and consumer manipulations.
6) Intel Insider Quanda stock and market rigging systems.
7) Microsoft OS horizontally tied by OEM license to Intel below cost product.
These seven categories of Intel systems deliver debilitating tendencies. System, social, and financial consequence’s on competition, enterprise, industry, regulatory, law enforcement and protection, political body, Nation’s stability, financial markets and capital creation potential. And continue to perpetuate hurdles in the way of system remedies from over 18 years of not owing up to many Intel and Microsoft antitrust violations, and concealing PC Media system crimes that have destroyed industries, competition and legitimate governance functions.
Accordingly back too the negotiating table. Docket 9341 should proceed too FTC hearing stage focused on Sherman Act Section 1 and 2 per se condemnations of law known under Section 5 umbrella which is Docket 9341.
FTC Focus -
1) Competitor limiting by vertical restraints for multiple laterals of combination.
2) Limited by horizontal contract in combinations including conspiracy to conceal.
3) In combinations cartel routing & price fixing raising consumer PC price by 6%.
4) In combinations monopoly price impact on consumers from media manipulation.
5) Validate recovery for consumer monopoly price, routing & price fixing harms.
Finally, for Docket 9341 in hearing too verify the criminal components of these competition case matters in proceeding transcript for Department of Justice timely follow on complaint;
DOJ Focus -
1) Recovering consumer monopoly price, product routing and price fixing harms.
2) Prosecuting competition, commercial frauds and racketeering that are criminal
components of the FTC Docket 9341 competition case violation’s themselves.
SEC Focus –
1) Documenting Accounting Fraud and with DOJ prosecuting Stock Market Rig.
In Summary -
Any ruling away from complete documentation of Docket 9341 case facts, in open proceedings, would deny the United States, American People, elected representatives in Congress and Senate the knowledge reference to act on the complete set of case facts.
Complete assessment of proposed order and included oversight clauses attached.
Regards,
Mike Bruzzone
Camp Marketing Consultancy
“”
Commissioners of the Federal Trade Commission – In the Matter of Intel Corporation FTC Docket 9341
See Link Below for More Information
http://www.ceopaulotellini.com/2010/09/commissioners-of-federal-trade.html
Posted by Crystal L. Cox at 8:23 PM
Labels: Congressional Committees, FTC 9341, FTC Corruption, FTC Misrepresentation, Intel Corp., Intel Docket 9341, Intell Communications, Mike Bruzzone, Senate Committee
0 comments:
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
SEC Complaint Iviewit – Intel Corp.
Intel Lawsuits
Derivative Action Lawsuit
Intel is Corrupt in My Opinon and the SEC needs to Wake Up and Shut Down the Intel Mafai as Intel Corp. continues to violate Anti-Trust Laws and stomp on competitors that have better – cheaper products.
The Intel Cartel needs to Obey the laws that all the other smaller Tech Companies seem to have to obey..
Click Here for Intel Derivative Action
To Intel – Paul Otellin – Bruce Sewell from Eliot Bernstein
Iviewit – Intel – Sewell – Otellini Documents
Letters to Intel – What Bruce Sewell
and Intel Knew – Click HERE.
Intel involved in Pending Trillion
Dollar international RICO Conspiracy lawsuit.
Intel Was Only Company Interested In McAfee, Could Impact Symantec
Times of the Internet
- Sep 07, 2010
- 21 hours ago
The reason he says is because a September 3, 2010 SEC filing indicates that Intel Corporation (NASDAQ:INTC) was the only company interested in buying McAfee …
Intel Corporation to acquire wireless solutions business of Infineon Technologies
Trading Markets (press release)
- Sep 02, 2010
- Sep 02, 2010
Intel Corporation, a US-based semiconductor chip making company, has entered into a definitive agreement to acquire wireless solutions (WLS) business of …
Intel could help standardize USB 3.0 with Cougar Point chipset this year
Business 2.0 Press
- Sep 07, 2010
- 20 hours ago
By Murad Haddad The world’s largest microprocessor maker, Intel Corporation, has confirmed the company would for the first time include USB 3.0 support in …
August Recap: Markets Need to Adapt to a Low Growth Economy
Seeking Alpha (blog)
- Sep 07, 2010
- 23 hours ago
(Bloomberg 8/31/2010) Intel Corporation (INTC): Less than 30 days after posting its best quarter ever, Intel shook off an earnings warning and continued …
| powered by |
Intel CEO Paul Otellini Forsees Tech Decline in U.S.
Zimonet
- Aug 27, 2010
- Aug 27, 2010
… Intel Chief Executive Officer Paul Otellini bundled his comments with a bleak outlook on the future of the US tech industry if things continue unchanged …
Intel’s Atom chipping away at new uses
San Jose Business Journal
- Sep 07, 2010
- 22 hours ago
Under the leadership of CEO Paul Otellini, Intel’s Atom processors are reportedly showing up in places few computer chips have been before. …
Live-Blogging the Intel-McAfee Announcement
Wall Street Journal (blog)
- Aug 19, 2010
- Aug 19, 2010
Intel CEO Paul Otellini waved as he walked off the stage after his keynote address at the 2010 Consumer Electronics Show. The aim of the acquisition is to …
Videos: Intel CEO Paul Otellini on the Infineon and McAfee acquisitions, plus …
IntoMobile (blog)
- Aug 31, 2010
- Aug 31, 2010
You’re rarely going to hear me say this, so here it goes: Fox News recently recorded a stellar interview with Intel CEO Paul Otellini and discussed the …
| powered by |
Angel of sometimes Darkness says I love you to the Angel of Light, wishing to Join the Light as Darkness is such a headache!
Tags: allen stanford, Andrew Cuomo, barroway, bernard madoff, copyright, crossbow ventures, eliot bernstein, eric holder, First Department, first department disciplinary, intel, inventor, iviewit, Joe Biden, JUDITH KAYE, kenneth rubenstein, lockheed, marc dreier, martin glenn, meltzer, MICHAEL GREBE, mpeg, mpegla, ny senate judiciary committee, patent, patentgate, PONZI, proskauer, ralph winter, RAYMOND A. JOAO, SEC, sex, sgi, SHIRA SCHEINDLIN, thomas cahill, thomas sjoblom, video, wayne huizenga, xxx