Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-settings.php on line 520

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-settings.php on line 535

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-settings.php on line 542

Deprecated: Assigning the return value of new by reference is deprecated in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-settings.php on line 578

Deprecated: Function set_magic_quotes_runtime() is deprecated in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-settings.php on line 18

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Page::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1199

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_PageDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1244

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Category::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1391

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_CategoryDropdown::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/classes.php on line 1442

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class wpdb in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/wp-db.php on line 306

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Object_Cache in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/cache.php on line 431

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::start_lvl(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_lvl() should be compatible with Walker::end_lvl(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::start_el() should be compatible with Walker::start_el(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Declaration of Walker_Comment::end_el() should be compatible with Walker::end_el(&$output) in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/comment-template.php on line 1266

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Dependencies in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/class.wp-dependencies.php on line 31

Strict Standards: Redefining already defined constructor for class WP_Http in /home2/iviewit/public_html/wordpress/wp-includes/http.php on line 61
bernard madoff « Iviewit Blogosphere

Posts Tagged ‘bernard madoff’

Iviewit News Update

Friday, January 3rd, 2014

Breaking News

INDICTMENTS COMING! US SENATOR JOHN SAMPSON FORMER HEAD OF THE NEW YORK DEMOCRATIC PARTY AND CHAIRMAN OF THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE WAS THREATENED & BRIBED TO COVER UP NY & FEDERAL CORRUPTION!!

UPDATE - INDICTMENTS COMING : Iviewit Breaking News: NY Supreme Court Ethics Oversight Bosses Alleged MISUSE of Joint Terrorism Task Force Resources & Funds & Violations of Patriot Acts Against Civilian Targets for Personal Gain… US Senator John Sampson Threatened & Bribed to Cover Up NY & Federal Corruption!!

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-breaking-indictments-coming-us-senator-john-sampson-threatened-bribed-to-cover-up-ny-federal-corruption-1369140092.html

——————————————————————————

Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Expose Corrupt Courts

INSIDER SAYS NY STATE OFFICIALS BRIEFED ON JUDICIAL CORRUPTION INDICTMENTS

BREAKING NEWS:  A New York State Court administrative insider says that top state officials have been briefed by the feds on pending federal corruption indictments that will include New York state court employees….

And late this morning, a Washington, D.C. source confirmed the information, adding that the target of one federal corruption indictment will include at least one sitting New York State judge and other  individuals- all with ties to major banks…….

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2013/05/insider-says-ny-state-officials-briefed.html

——————————————————————————

UPDATE: SENATOR JOHN SAMPSON, FORMER NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY CHAIR THREATENED AND BRIBED TO COVER UP OFFICIAL CORRUPTION

FRIDAY, MAY 17, 2013

Washington, D.C. Insider Says Senator John Sampson Covered-Up Court Corruption

BREAKING NEWS: Washington, D.C. insider says NYS Senator John Sampson covered-up evidence of widespread corruption in New York Surrogate’s Courts.

Source says Sampson was first threatened, but then successfully bribed, to bury evidence involving countless state and federal crimes involving billions of dollars.

Syracuse, Rochester, Albany, White Plains, Brooklyn and Manhattan Surrogate’s Courts are said to top the list of areas involved.

It was revealed on Wednesday that a New York State Court administrative insider said that top state officials had been briefed by the feds on pending federal corruption indictments that would include employees of New York’s Office of Court Administration (a/ka/ “OCA”). Most court employees, including judges, are employed by OCA.

It was further confirmed by the Washington, D.C. source that judges, with ties to banks, would be among those charged.

http://ethicsgate.blogspot.com/2013/05/washington-dc-insider-says-senator-john.html

——————————————————————————

IVIEWIT BREAKING NEWS: NY SUPREME COURT ETHICS OVERSIGHT BOSSES ALLEGED MISUSE OF JOINT TERRORISM TASK FORCE RESOURCES & FUNDS & VIOLATIONS OF PATRIOT ACTS AGAINST CIVILIAN TARGETS FOR PERSONAL GAIN..

May 14,2013

See Full Story at:

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-breaking-news-ny-supreme-court-ethics-oversight-bosses-alleged-misuse-of-joint-terrorism-task-force-resources-funds-violations-of-patriot-1368533731.html

and

http://ethicsgate.blogspot.com/2013/04/formal-complaint-filed-against-nys.html

——————————————————————————

FORMAL COMPLAINT FILED AGAINST NYS EMPLOYEES FOR ILLEGAL WIRETAPPING…THE WIDESPREAD ILLEGAL WIRETAPPING INCLUDED TARGETED NEW YORK STATE JUDGES AND ATTORNEYS…..

http://ethicsgate.blogspot.com/2013/04/formal-complaint-filed-against-nys.html

SELECT QUOTES FROM THAT NEWS STORY

April 3, 2013

Robert Moossy, Jr., Section Chief
Criminal Section, Civil Rights Division
US Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, D.C. 20530

RE: FORMAL COMPLAINT AGAINST NEW YORK STATE EMPLOYEES INVOLVING CONSTITUTIONAL VIOLATIONS, INCLUDING WIDESPREAD ILLEGAL WIRETAPPING

Dear Mr. Moossy,

At some point in time shortly after 9/11, and by methods not addressed here, these individuals improperly utilized access to, and devices of, the lawful operations of the Joint Terrorism Task Force (the JTTF). These individuals completely violated the provisions of FISA, ECPA and the Patriot Act for their own personal and political agendas. Specifically, these NY state employees essentially commenced black bag operations, including illegal wiretapping, against whomever they chose- and without legitimate or lawful purpose.

This complaint concerns the illegal use and abuse of such lawful operations for personal and political gain, and all such activity while acting under the color of law. This un-checked access to highly-skilled operatives found undeserving protection for some connected wrong-doers, and the complete destruction of others- on a whim, including the pre-prosecution priming of falsehoods (set-ups). The aftermath of such abuse for such an extended period of time is staggering.

It is believed that most of the 1.5 million-plus items in evidence now under seal in Federal District Court for the Eastern District of New York, case #09cr405 (EDNY) supports the fact, over a ten-year-plus period of time, of the illegal wiretapping of New York State judges, attorneys, and related targets, as directed by state employees.

One sworn affidavit, by an attorney, confirms the various illegal activity of Manhattan’s attorney ethics committee, the Departmental Disciplinary Committee (the DDC), which includes allowing cover law firm operations to engage in the practice of law without a law license. Specifically, evidence (attorney affidavits, etc.) supports the claim that Naomi Goldstein, and other DDC employees supervised the protection of the unlicensed practice of law. The evidence also shows that Ms. Goldstein knowingly permitted the unlicensed practice of law, over a five-year-plus period of time, for the purpose of gaining access to, and information from, hundreds of litigants.

Evidence also supports the widespread illegal use of black bag operations by the NYS employees for a wide-range of objectives: to target or protect a certain judge or attorney, to set-up anyone who had been deemed to be a target, or to simply achieve a certain goal. The illegal activity is believed to not only have involved attorneys and judges throughout all of the New York State, including all 4 court-designated ethics departments, but also in matters beyond the borders of New York.

The set-up of numerous individuals for an alleged plot to bomb a Riverdale, NY Synagogue. These individuals are currently incarcerated. The trial judge, U.S. District Court Judge Colleen McMahon, who publicly expressed concerns over the case, saying, I have never heard anything like the facts of this case. I don’t think any other judge has ever heard anything like the facts of this case. (2nd Circuit 11cr2763).

The concerted effort to fix numerous cases where confirmed associates of organized crime had made physical threats upon litigants and/or witnesses, and/or had financial interests in the outcome of certain court cases.

The judicial and attorney protection/operations, to gain control, of the $250 million-plus Thomas Carvel estate matters, and the pre-prosecution priming of the $150 million-plus Brooke Astor estate.

The wire-tapping and ISP capture, etc., of DDC attorney, Christine C. Anderson, who had filed a lawsuit after being assaulted by a supervisor, Sherry Cohen, and after complaining that certain evidence in ethics case files had been improperly destroyed. (See SDNY case #07cv9599 - Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin, U.S.D.J.)

The eToys litigation and bankruptcy, and associates of Marc Dreir, involving over $500 million and the protection by the DDC of certain attorneys, one who was found to have lied to a federal judge over 15 times.

The set-up and chilling of effective legal counsel of a disabled woman by a powerful CEO and his law firms, resulting in her having no contact with her children for over 6 years.

The wrongful detention for 4 years, prompted by influential NY law firms, of an early whistleblower of the massive Wall Street financial irregularities involving Bear Sterns and where protected attorney-client conversations were recorded and distributed.

The blocking of attorney accountability in the $1.25 billion Swiss Bank Holocaust Survivor settlement where one involved NY admitted attorney was ultimately disbarred- in New Jersey. Only then, and after 10 years, did the DDC follow with disbarment. Gizella Weisshaus v. Fagan.

——————————————————————————

NY SUPREME COURT BOSSES ILLEGALLY WIRETAPPING JUDGES CHAMBERS & HOMES. CHRISTINE ANDERSON WHISTLEBLOWER ILLEGALLY TARGETED FOR 24/7/365 SURVEILLANCE IN RELATED CASE TO IVIEWIT ELIOT BERNSTEIN RICO…

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

(Free-Press-Release.com) May 14, 2013 — According to news reports, yes, the heads of the NY Supreme Court Ethics Department have been accused of derailing Justice by targeting victims and misusing Government Resources against private citizens with no other motive then Obstruction of Justice in court and regulatory actions against them or their cronies.

World Renowned Inventor Eliot Bernstein files NEW RICO RELATED CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS against Law Firms Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Greenberg Traurig and more. Allegations that Bernstein was a target of these criminals cloaked as ATTORNEY AT LAW ETHICS BOSSES at the NY Supreme Court were presented to Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin. That evidence was presented that Bernstein’s father may have been a target and murdered for his efforts to notify the authorities and more!!!

READ ALL ABOUT IT @

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20130512%20FINAL%20Motion%20to%20Rehear%20and%20Reopen%20Obstruction%20of%20Justice165555%20WITH%20EXHIBITS.pdf

PREVIOUS PRESS RELEASES RELATING TO JUDGES ILLEGALLY WIRETAPPED

That on Tuesday, February 19, 2013, ECC released the story,

ETHICSGATE UPDATE FAXED TO EVERY U.S. SENATOR THE ULTIMATE VIOLATION OF TRUST IS THE CORRUPTION OF ETHICS OVERSIGHT EXCLUSIVE UPDATE:

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2013/02/ethicsgate-update-faxed-to-every-us.html

IVIEWIT LETTER TO US DOJ OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL MICHAEL E. HOROWITZ

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20130520%20FINAL%20Michael%20Horowitz%20Inspector%20General%20Department%20of%20Justice%20SIGNED%20PRINTED%20EMAIL.pdf

IVIEWIT RICO MOTION FOR CLARIFICATION:

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20130513%20FINAL%20Motion%20for%20Clarification%20of%20Order174604%20WITH%20NO%20EXHIBITS.pdf

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox Sues Forbes and the New York Times for Defamation. March 6, 2013

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-investigative-blogger-crystal-cox-sues-forbes-and-the-new-york-times-for-defamation-1362547010.html

COURT CASES OF INTEREST

COX VS. RANDAZZA, ET AL. “ NEVADA RICO CASE NO. 2:13-CV-00297-JCM-VCF CHANGED TO 2:13-CV-00297 JCM (NJK) CHANGED TO 2:13-CV-00297 MMD-VCF

OBSIDIAN FINANCE GROUP, LLC ET AL. V. COX CASE NO. 3:11-CV-00057-HZ (Famed First Amendment Rights Attorney at Law and Professor, Eugene Volokh, Esq., Professor at UCLA School of Law is representing Cox on Appeal)

Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey. Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more.

Monday, March 5th, 2012

Proskauer Rose, Chadbourne and others Charged with Conspiracy and Fraud in R. Allen Stanford Ponzi by Court Receiver for Victims Ralph Janvey.

Stanford Trial Drags Former Proskauer, Chadbourne Partner Back into Spotlight
Brian Baxter The American Lawyer February 8, 2012
View Article here,

http://www.law.com/jsp/tal/PubArticleTAL.jsp?id=1202541880071&slreturn=1

—–

Iviewit Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein Publishes Draft Motion to US Appeals Court involving direct ties to the Iviewit Stolen Patents and Sir R. Allen Stanford, Bernie Madoff, Galleon, Dreier, MF Global scams and more

—–

IVIEWIT DRAFT MOTION TO SECOND CIRCUS CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS OF CONFLICTS

Case No. 08-4873-CV

——

United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit
Justices: Debra Ann Livingston, Richard C. Wesley, Peter W. Hall and- Ralph K. Winter, Jr.

—-

Eliot Ivan Bernstein, Pro Se Plaintiff – Appellant

–v–

Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee et al. Defendants / Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

CASE 07 Civ. 11196 (Shira Anne Scheindlin)

LEGALLY Related Case to Iviewit RICO by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin to:

(07 Civ. 9599) (SAS-AJP) WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT of Christine C. Anderson, Esq. v. the State of New York, et al.
(Anderson, a Former New York Supreme Court Attorney)

Cases Legally Related to Anderson/Iviewit:

1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT

2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.

3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.

4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.

5. Related Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY

6. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin

7. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.

8. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.

9. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.

10. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.

11. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.

12. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.

13. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.

14. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.

15. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York

16. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al.

ELIOT IVAN BERNSTEIN, PRO SE
2753 N.W. 34TH STREET BOCA RATON, FLORIDA 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o) / (561) 886.7628 (c) / (561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv / www.iviewit.tv


MOTION TO:

· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Attorney General’s now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest both past and present, in acting ILLEGALLY as Counsel for 39 plus State Defendant/Actors in this Lawsuit by Violating Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law.

· Remand and Rehear this Lawsuit due to the New York State Supreme Court’s Attorney Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson’s (“Anderson”) Felony Criminal Allegations against SENIOR Court Officials, Public Officials et al.

· HALT THIS LAWSUIT and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, pending investigations of Whistleblower Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL Allegations against Members of the New York Attorney General’s Office, the US Attorney’s Office, the New York District Attorney’s Office, New York State Supreme Court, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Departments and others. FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS EXPOSED in US Federal District Court, THIS COURT and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee by the HEROIC TESTIMONY and SWORN STATEMENTS of NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON.

· IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL Justices and other Members of the United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals ( this Court ) whom have acted to this point in this Lawsuit in any capacity whatsoever, for Aiding and Abetting Fraud on the Court, Obstruction of Justice, Denial of Due Process and more.

· Remove ALL other Conflicts of Interest currently in place in this Lawsuit in order to implement FAIR & IMPARTIAL DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW.

· DEMAND that ALL parties to this Lawsuit going forward, including but not limited to, Court Justices & Officials, Attorneys at Law, Prosecutors, Clerks, et al. Sign and Affirm Conflict of Interest Disclosures identical to the one attached herein, acknowledging PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES for any violation, prior to, ANY further Action by ANYONE in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

· Demand for Justices and others named herein of this Court to turn themselves in to the appropriate State and Federal Criminal Authorities to ANSWER to filed CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against them and served upon them.

——

Caution! if you have not signed the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure form at the bottom of this URL page and returned it as instructed and you continue to act in any official manner whatsoever in these matters, Criminal Charges will be brought against you for Obstruction of Justice, Aiding & Abetting a Criminal RICO Organization and More. See the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form for further information regarding your potential personal and professional liabilities if you are personally or professionally liable.

—–

I. Introduction

“What country before ever existed a century & a half without a rebellion? & what country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance? Let them take arms. The remedy is to set them right as to facts, pardon & pacify them. What signify a few lives lost in a century or two? The tree of liberty must be refreshed from time to time with the blood of patriots & tyrants. It is its natural manure.”

The “Tree of Liberty” letter from Thomas Jefferson to William Smith

http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/96oct/obrien/blood.htm

A.  NEW YORK SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER ATTORNEY, CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON, ESQ. (“Anderson”) MAKES FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS IN US FEDERAL COURT AND BEFORE THE NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE. ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SENIOR RANKING OFFICIALS OF THE US ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL’S OFFICE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT, THE NEW YORK SUPREME COURT DISCIPLINARY DEPARTMENTS, “FAVORED LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS” [Footnote 3]  and names a “CLEANER” [Footnote 4] , as revealed in federal court testimony, a one Naomi Goldstein. THESE ALLEGATIONS DEMAND IMMEDIATE REPORTING, INVESTIGATION AND HALTING OF THE LEGALLY RELATED IVIEWIT RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT IN ORDER TO BEGIN INVESTIGATIONS TO IDENTIFY AND PROSECUTE THOSE FINGERED BY WHISTLEBLOWER ANDERSON and OTHERS.

—–

[Footnotes 3 &4]

[3] From Anderson’s Sworn Statement to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, “Specifically, I discovered and reported that employees of the DDC had engaged in, inter alia, the “whitewashing” [of] complaints of misconduct leveled against certain “select” attorneys and law firms. This “whitewashing” sometimes involved burying cases or destroying evidence, so that certain complaints were inevitably, unavoidably, dismissed. I witnessed this destruction of evidence myself. Other reported misconduct involves victimizing attorneys lacking privileged positions or connections.”

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=365

[4] “Legal Document: Request for Discovery” Posted on July 22, 2011 by Fred Celani

http://fredcelani.wordpress.com/2011/07/22/request-for-discovery/

—–

The “Legally Related” Federal Lawsuit of New York Supreme Court Veteran Senior Supreme Court Disciplinary Department Attorney and Expert in Attorney Criminal Misconduct Complaints, Whistleblower Christine Anderson, Esq., by Federal Judge Shira Anne Scheindlin to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, exposes from the inside, a legal conspiracy of corruption involving the highest levels of Regulatory, Prosecutorial and Judicial Public Offices both State and Federal. Heroism is a word earned through action. The Whistleblowing Efforts of Anderson, another New York Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower and Hero, Nicole Corrado, Esq., and, a Sitting New York Supreme Court Justice, Honorable Duane A. Hart, Esq., all cited herein, should be the Moniker of HEROISM for others in the legal profession to follow.

These Whistleblowers Expose Corruption at the Top of Government, including the Courts, this Court, the Department of Justice, the New York Attorney General and others. They further provide the World with an understanding of how America’s Financial System has melted top down, from rigged economic breakdowns and controlled demolition of world markets through fraud, with no Regulators or Prosecutors or Courts to stop it, in fact, all of them Aiding and Abetting the crimes. Nobody attempting to RECOVER the stolen funds for the PEOPLE, as all of the Top Government Officials charged with enforcement of the Law, appear on the take and part of the crimes according to these Whistleblowers. These Whistleblowing efforts expose how and why no one on Wall Street/Greed Street/Fraud Street has been charged with Criminal Acts, despite massive and overwhelming evidence of CRIMINAL ACTS and FRAUD. Further exposed, is why none of the Stolen Loot from these Economic Crimes have been recovered back to the People. What is unveiled is a COUP D’ÉTAT on the HIGHEST OUTPOSTS OF LAW & ORDER in the United States and yet not a single story in the Mainstream Media aka US Pravda Press, regarding these shocking allegations by inside Whistleblowers.

Exposed by these HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS is a REVOLVING DOOR between a licentious GROUP OF LAW FIRMS and ATTORNEYS AT LAW, acting in both PRIVATE PRACTICE and PUBLIC OFFICE, working together in CONSPIRACY and forming a RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION with tentacles embedded at the highest outposts of the US Government in order to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE for the CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE. Anderson, Corrado and Other Public Office Whistleblowers cited herein, also provide explanation for why Judges and Attorneys at Law are now desperately trying to grant themselves immunity for felony crimes and attempting to use the State Attorney General Offices and other Government officials as accomplice in the cover-up. Immunity for ATTORNEYS AT LAW for their role in TORTURE CRIMES, WAR CRIMES and ECONOMIC CRIMES, crimes that include the CREATION OF ILLEGAL/FRAUDULENT FINANCIAL & INSURANCE CONTRACTS that led to the RIGGED HOUSING and MARKET COLLAPSES, that led to MILLIONS OF VERY ILLEGAL FORECLOSURES and left MILLIONS UNEMPLOYED AND STARVING. Seeking immunity for crime, as a legal defense is both futile and an obvious admission of guilt, which will never hold in a fair and impartial court of law? The attempts to gain immunity for FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS shows culpability in the crimes, exposing fear by the guilty of retribution of the day when the “long arm of the law” swings back. Fear that they will hang for their crimes against Humanity, their War Crimes (Illegal Undeclared Wars of Aggression, Torture, Misappropriation of Public funds by Congress for Undeclared Wars, Economic Terrorism and more) and they must hope for dirty courts to clear them forever.

Whistleblowing comes at a price to Whistleblowers in this new environment of a CRIMINAL GOVERNMENT. Christine Anderson, Corrado, Hart and others, including PLAINTIFF have been through hell to bring this INFORMATION TO LIGHT and where this Court should acknowledge Anderson, Corrado and the others who have come forth for their HEROISM, suspiciously, they do not. These are TRUE AMERICAN PATRIOTS, HEROES and ROLE MODELS OF ETHICS shunned by the very legal system they work in. We instead find this Court currently attempting to ILLEGALLY DISMISS Anderson’s WHISTLEBLOWER Lawsuit and the “legally related” cases prior to investigations and hearings of the criminal acts exposed by government officials against other Senior Ranking Officials.

We find THIS COURT attempting to BURY THE FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST FEDERAL AND STATE AGENCIES EXPOSED BY CREDIBLE WITNESSES in a FEDERAL COURT by “SWEEPING THEM UNDER THE RUG,” PRIOR TO INVESTIGATIONS REQUIRED BY LAW, as more fully defined herein. Therefore, Plaintiff starts this Motion in Honor. A Tip of the Hat to the TRUE PATRIOTS NAMED HEREIN AND THEIR HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING EFFORTS TO BLOW THE LID OFF ONE OF THE LARGEST CORRUPTION STORIES OF ALL TIME, PLACING MEMBERS OF THIS COURT RIGHT IN THE CENTER of world market fraud and more, A ROOT OF THE PROBLEM.

B. MEET THE COUPSTERS

“I am a most unhappy man. I have unwittingly ruined my country. A great industrial nation is controlled by its system of credit. Our system of credit is concentrated. The growth of the nation, therefore, and all our activities are in the hands of a few men. We have come to be one of the worst ruled, one of the most completely controlled and dominated Governments in the civilized world no longer a Government by free opinion, no longer a Government by conviction and the vote of the majority, but a Government by the opinion and duress of a small group of dominant men.” - Woodrow Wilson, after signing the Federal Reserve into existence

Anderson’s Whistleblowing CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS reveal a MASSIVE GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION, exposing a NETWORK OF CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES/ATROCITIES operated by a CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATION inside Government, effectively creating a subterfuge to law. The RICO ENTERPRISE is comprised mainly of Powerful and Influential Law Firms, Attorneys at Law, Lawmaker Politicians, Public Officials and Judicial Officials, according to these Whistleblowers. Together, acting in Conspiracy, these trusted officials all abuse their legal degrees and positions in TOP OUTPOSTS OF LAW in order to aid and abet the commission and cover-ups of COMPLEX ILLEGAL LEGAL CRIMES, including directing operatives in various government capacities to subterfuge and subvert Law, Regulation and Justice to prevent prosecution.

According to Anderson, operatives of the CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATION, include but are not limited to, SENIOR STATE and FEDERAL PUBLIC OFFICIALS, almost all with legal degrees, operating inside US Government Agencies, including the courts and prosecutorial offices, DISABLING JUSTICE and REGULATION, and opening the door for the RICO Enterprise’s COMPLEX ILLEGAL LEGAL CRIMES to proceed. Illegal Legal Crimes packaged and rolled out by ATTORNEYS AT LAW that all are currently contributing to the INTENTIONAL Bankrupting of World Markets through a series of sophisticated frauds.

Examples of these frauds, include but are not limited to, FRAUDULENT SUBPRIME MORTGAGES, FRAUDULENT Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), FRAUDULENT DERIVATIVES, FRAUDULENT INSURANCE CONTRACTS, FRAUDULENT TARP FUNDS [Footnote 5 and 6] and VIOLATIONS OF ANTITRUST LAWS. Where all of these FRAUDS require superior knowledge of Law, the type only LICENSED ATTORNEYS AT LAW posses. The Criminal Operatives, disguised as ATTORNEYS AT LAW with LEGAL DEGREES, are nested deep inside Government at Key Posts, in order to COVER-UP the CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATION’S ILLEGAL LEGAL CRIMES. The Operatives now are deeply embedded in the United States and New York regulatory agencies, prosecutorial agencies and courts, at the highest levels, as revealed by Anderson and others. Here comes a political scandal on an International Scale to make Boss Tweed’s New York Tammany Hall look like a Juvenile Delinquency robbing of the cookie jar.

—–

[FOOTNOTES 5&6]

[5] “The Wall Street Pentagon Papers: Biggest Scam In World History Exposed: Are The Federal Reserve’s Crimes Too Big To Comprehend?” by David DeGraw, Fourwinds10.com, December 02, 2011

and

“Federal Reserve Secretly Loaned Gaddafi & Others $1.2 Trillion Say Monetary Experts - We’ve given the Fed the power to create paper money, secretly distribute it to political favorites, and thereby sway our stock market and elections,” says Craig R. Smith, founder and Chairman of Swiss America Trading Corporation. In Re-Making Money: Ways to Restore America’s Optimistic Golden Age, a new White Paper published August 15 on the 40th Anniversary of Nixon’s action, Smith and Ponte call for new ways to again anchor the U.S. Dollar to prevent politicians and the Fed from simply creating trillions out of thin air and using this money for political purposes. The politicizing of paper money, Smith says, is a major cause of today’s economic problems: unemployment, near-zero economic growth, inflation, collapsed bubbles such as the housing market, and investor insecurity among them.”

PR Web, August 22, 2011

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/8/prweb8737214.htm

and

“The Wall Street Pentagon Papers: Biggest Scam In World History Exposed: Are The Federal Reserve’s Crimes Too Big To Comprehend?” by David DeGraw, Fourwinds10.com, December 02, 2011

and

“16 TRILLION Reasons Why Everyone In Washington, Including The President, Should Be Heading To Prison

A Time For Choosing” by Gary Jackson, FreeRepublic, LLC, July 22, 2011

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2752675/posts

[6] “TARP 18x: the Unknown Bailout that Requires a Supreme Court Ruling for Full Disclosure” by Steadfast Finances, January 30, 2012

http://steadfastfinances.com/blog/2010/09/07/tarp-18x-the-unknown-bailout-that-requires-a-supreme-court-ruling-for-full-disclosure/

and

“The true cost of the bank bailout” | Need to Know | PBS Video, January 30, 2012

http://video.pbs.org/video/1581037108

—–

000

Boss Tweed and the Tammany Ring, caricatured by Thomas Nast. Source: 1870s cartoon by Thomas Nast. Date c.1870s Author Thomas Nast. Cropped by Beyond My Ken URL = http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_M._Tweed

Anderson’s Testimony before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, Senator John Sampson, Chairman

MS. ANDERSON: I alleged that upon learning of the DDC’s [New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department – Departmental Disciplinary Committee’s] pattern and practice of whitewashing and routinely dismissing complaints leveled against certain select attorneys — to the detriment of the public that the DDC is duty-bound to serve — I reported this wrongdoing pursuant to my rights under the First Amendment to the United States constitution and, importantly, my own ethical obligations under the New York State Code of Professional Responsibility.

In response, however, rather than attempting to address and rectify the problem, my supervisors embarked upon a campaign of abuse and harassment of myself, including a physical assault on myself by the first deputy, Sherry Cohen.

My one recommendation that I would like to make, however, is on the last page, which is I think that the Policy Committee should be disbanded, for the simple reason that it is rife with conflict…

SENATOR PERKINS.: Can I ask a question? Just so I’m clear, because (a) you’re saying that preferential treatment in this decision-making, in this process, that there are those who, because of their stature or their connections, are not prosecuted or investigated or whatever the appropriate terminology is?

MS. ANDERSON: Or handled lightly.

SENATOR PERKINS: Or handled lightly. I just want to be clear that that’s what you’re saying.

MS. ANDERSON: Yes.

Further, from Anderson’s Sworn Statement to the NY Senate Judiciary Committee [Footnote 7] [7 The Anderson statement can be found online @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=114 and has already been submitted to this Court by both Anderson and Plaintiff, hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein in case the documents have been destroyed as depicted by Anderson.and leading Justice Officials], quote,

Monday, September 21, 2009

Christine C. Anderson Letter

“Re: Request for Federal Investigation Into Allegations of Corruption and Witness Intimidation and Appointment of Federal Monitor” [The Statement Addressed directly to all of the following parties]

The Hon. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States Office of the Attorney General

The Hon. Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York United States Department of Justice

The Hon. William M. Welch II, Chief, Public Integrity Unit United States Department of Justice

The Hon. John L. Sampson, Chairman, New York State Senate Judiciary Committee

Gentlemen:

My name is Christine C. Anderson. For six and one-half years, I was a Principal Attorney of the New York State Appellate Division, First Department’s Departmental Disciplinary Committee (the “DDC”). The DDC is responsible for investigating and disciplining attorneys found guilty of misconduct in representing the public in the Bronx and Manhattan [regulating Wall Street Attorneys, Prosecutors, Judges, Regulators or any other Attorney at Law on Wall Street/Greed Street/Fraud Street]. After discovering and reporting of acts of misconduct and corruption at the DDC, which acts constituted an abuse of power and a fraud upon the public, my employment was summarily terminated in June, 2007…

Specifically, I discovered and reported that employees of the DDC had engaged in, inter alia, the “whitewashing” complaints of misconduct leveled against certain “select” attorneys and law firms. This “whitewashing” sometimes involved burying cases or destroying evidence, so that certain complaints were inevitably, unavoidably, dismissed. I witnessed this destruction of evidence myself. Other reported misconduct involves victimizing attorneys lacking privileged positions or connections.

Although the then Chief Counsel of the DDC, Thomas Cahill [Defendant in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit], stepped down in 2007, evidence clearly establishes that under the leadership of Alan Friedberg [Iviewit filed Criminal Complaints Against Friedberg], the current Chief Counsel, the same practice of corruption and whitewashing of complaints continues. Such practice robs the public of any hope at justice; it also works to the detriment of the very public the DDC is duty-bound to serve.

During the course of my litigation against the DDC, a former colleague of mine, who still works as a Principal Attorney at the DDC, agreed to testify on my behalf at a deposition. This former colleague, Nicole Corrado, has been employed by the DDC for approximately eight years, prior to which she worked as a prosecutor for New York State. On the morning of her deposition, however, while en route to her deposition, Ms. Corrado was approached on the street by a supervisor at the DDC, who threatened and intimidated her with respect to her upcoming deposition testimony. Although terribly shaken, Ms. Corrado nonetheless sat for her deposition and testified truthfully. Following her deposition, however, Ms. Corrado has been subjected to further harassment and intimidation at the hands of the DDC. She has been forced to take a leave of absence as a result.

On June 8, 2009, I testified at a hearing convened by John L. Sampson, New York State Senator and Chairman of the New York State Standing Committee On The Judiciary. (A copy of my affidavit submitted to the Committee is attached hereto as Exhibit B.)…

The detailed testimony presented by innumerable witnesses at the June 8th Senate hearing reveals the manifold reports of corruption and abuse by the State’s Disciplinary Committees. (A copy of the transcript of this hearing is attached hereto as Exhibit C.) Charges included concealment of evidence, obstruction of justice, extortionate sexual threats by attorneys, pilfering of estates by attorneys, abuse of power, fraud, conspiracy and repeated violations of state and federal constitutional rights.

In light of the foregoing, it is plain that the enduring practice of allowing attorneys in this state to police themselves is fundamentally flawed. With the numerous reports of abuse by both attorneys and state officials, the corruption in the court system has reached a critical stage. Accordingly, I respectfully request that you authorize the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to investigate the epidemic of honest services fraud in the New York state court system, and the appointment of a Federal Monitor, to oversee the lawful operation of the same.

[The Letter Was Copied to the Following Parties and all who received this letter addressed or copied to them and then fail to take legally required actions to report and investigate “credible” witness allegations of Major Felonies, are all subject to charges of Misprision of Felony, Felony Obstruction in a Federal Lawsuit and more.]

The Hon. David A. Paterson

New York State Governor

Office of the Governor of New York State

The Hon. Boyd M. Johnson III

Deputy United States Attorney for the

Southern District of New York

Public Corruption Unit

United States Department of Justice

The Hon. Loretta A. Preska

Chief U.S. District Judge

United States Courthouse

Southern District of New York

The Hon. Andrew M. Cuomo

New York State Attorney General

Office of the Attorney General of New York State

The Hon. Luis A. Gonzalez

Presiding Justice, New York State Appellate Division,1st Department

The Hon. Joseph M. Demarest, Jr.

Assistant Director in Charge, New York Division

Anderson’s WHISTLEBLOWING ALLEGATIONS provide an explanation into more than Corruption in the Courthouse and Public Offices, but also to just how Wall Street/Fraud Street has Melted Down, exposing a Conspiratorial Controlled Demolition that has obliterated Countries in the process, including the United States. A Conspiracy designed to profit a CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE, with legal cover from a legal system the CRIMINALS have taken over and disarmed. ILLEGAL and COMPLEX FINANCIAL CRIMES perpetrated by those in seats of power in Justice and Public Office, used to steal TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS from World Markets, using the Courts, Regulators and Prosecutors Offices in conjunction with Lawmakers to Aid and Abet the CRIMES.

Anderson’s Whistleblowing exposes further, why and how NOT A SINGLE PROSECUTION of the Criminals has occurred for any of the crimes, evidencing that behind ALL of these COMPLEX ILLEGAL LEGAL CRIMES are Law Firms and Attorneys at Law acting in criminal capacity to defeat Law and Justice. Anderson fingers the very Attorneys at Law, Regulators, Prosecutors and Judicial Officials, including those who regulate Attorneys at Law licensed on WALL STREET, including Members of this Court, who have partaken in FELONY CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES and FELONY CRIMINAL COVER-UPS, as further defined herein and in prior Motions submitted to this Court. Whistleblowing Exposure of GOVERNMENT CORRUPTION STATEWIDE AND FEDERALLY on a scale never before seen, leading to ECONOMIC RUINS upon this Country and the World, for the profit of a few, those in control of law and order in our country, this Court perhaps the center of the Criminal Nexus inside the Court System.

Anderson reveals that these CRIMINAL Attorneys at Law have infiltrated and planted deep into Justice, at every level, acting purely to disable Justice and suppress any Whistleblowers. With JUSTICE DISABLED, a free for all of criminal activity and havoc has since occurred. Effectively they have PLOTTED AND EXECUTED A TREASONOUS & TRAITOROUS Coup D’état TO DISABLE OUR SYSTEM OF CHECKS AND BALANCES and system of jurisprudence DESIGNED TO PREvent THESE most serious high CRIMES. our federal constitutional REPUBLIC DISABLED and in danger from those IN positions of POWER, those entrusted and in charge of upholding law and our constitution, almost all licensed attorneys at law.

Sounds like a no brainer, a Treason almost too big to believe, by the Leaders of Our Government, sustainable only if you can disable Justice forever. If Justice however is restored and trials of the CRIMINAL CONSPIRATORS had, the ATTORNEYS AT LAW, PROSECUTORS, REGULATORS, JUSTICES and LAWMAKERS OF BOTH PARTIES, involved in the CRIMINAL CARTEL, if found guilty, may very well hang for TREASON, ECONOMIC WAR CRIMES, WAR CRIMES, CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY, MURDER and TORTURE [Footnote 8] . The punishment for many of these crimes, when PROVEN IN A FAIR AND IMPARTIAL COURT OF LAW, ONE FREE OF CONFLICTS AND CRIMINALS, is the DEATH PENALTY. For the sheer magnitude of crimes committed, including but not limited to, the atrocities of torture and mass murder, already committed and aided by Criminal Members of the US Government, including Members of this Court, in many of the States, Federally and Internationally the DEATH PENALTY MOST CERTAINLY WILL BE SOUGHT.

—–

[Footnote 8]

[8] NOTE THAT MANY ATTORNEYS AT LAW ARE DIRECTLY CHARGED WITH WAR/TORTURE CRIMES & JUDGES ARE DOING THE COVERING UP.

“Getting Away with Torture - The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees” Human Rights Watch July 2011

http://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/04/23/getting-away-torture

and

“US judge rules to protect CIA over torture” Press TV August 2, 2011

http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/192015.html

—–

In order to understand how the US AND WORLD ECONOMIC COLLAPSES were not the result of organic economic factors, such as a Recessions or Depressions but are instead occurring due to CONSPIRATORIAL MARKET RIGGING, PRICE GOUGING, ANTITRUST ACTIVITIES, COMPLEX FINANCIAL FRAUDS and MORE, one must fully grasp the riveting FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS leveled by Anderson and other inside Whistleblowers. Allegations by insiders against virtually the entire framework of Justice and Regulation, both State and Federal, exposing the underbelly of a RICO CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE composed mainly of LAW FIRMS and ATTORNEYS AT LAW, in both PUBLIC and PRIVATE SECTORS. Exposed from the inside out and revealing a “Good Ole Boy” CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE throughout KEY GOVERNMENT POSTS, perverting the highest outposts of Justice and Law.

Additionally exposed are Attorneys at Law working in Private Practices and inside CORPORATIONS CONTROLLED BY THE CARTEL, to benefit the CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATION, the “Favored Law Firms and Lawyers” Anderson refers to in her Trial Testimony. These Private Practice Attorneys at Law, act as Corporate Counsel to Companies they have interests in, who are the business benefactors’ of the Crimes [Footnote 9]. One can spot some of them walking off with HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS of BOGUS BONUSES, while BANKRUPTING FORTUNE 100 COMPANIES, bedrocks of American Business.

—–

[Footnote 9]

[9] “The corporate bandits who stole your money while you slept” by Robinson, Matthew B. (2005). Justice Blind? Ideals and Realities of American Criminal Justice (2nd Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

http://www.justiceblind.com/new/bandits.htm

and

Wall Street Isn’t Winning – It’s Cheating, POSTED: By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone; Jann S. Wenner, Editor and Publisher, October 25, 2011

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/owss-beef-wall-street-isnt-winning-its-cheating-20111025

and

“Greed is good: maximization and elite deviance in America” By Matthew Robinson, Daniel Murphy”

*****Special Note should be given to how many of these companies directly relate to Plaintiff’s RICO & Antitrust Lawsuit as DEFENDANTS.

—–

These Private Criminal Attorneys at Law acting on behalf of the CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE also have infiltrated and infested the banking, financial, insurance and rating firms [Footnote 10], all combining in coordinated conspiracy to Demolish World Markets. While ILLEGALLY fixing their bets timely to profit through the Fraudulent Controlled Demolitions of Economies and Companies, Vulturizing the Carcasses of those destroyed, PROFITING OFF HUMAN SUFFERING. They work to Illegally Quash Competitors as seen in the Banking Industry and then take them over for pennies on the dollar (ie Lehman, AIG, etc.) or let them dissolve entirely and pick the bones at auction, the shareholders destroyed.

—–

[Footnote 10]

[10] “Are Ratings Agencies Taking Bribes? By Emily Knapp, Wall St. Cheat Sheet, October 31 2011

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/economy/are-ratings-agencies-taking-bribes.html

—–

Corporations Controlled by the Cartel also have Illegally Monopolized Industries through Violations of Antitrust Laws, and again we find Justice asleep at the wheel, while Millions of Small Businesses and the middle class are CANNIBALIZED. The list of crimes goes on and on, the ILLEGAL ACTIVITIES now VICTIMIZING MILLIONS OF SMALL BUSINESSES and HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE worldwide, all achieved through Fraud, War Crimes and Treason, to the benefit of an exclusive few. This type of Conspiratorial Attack on Financial Markets and World Markets through CRIMINAL ACTIVITY that has now directly victimized Hundreds of Millions of People Worldwide constitutes FINANCIAL TERRORISM, “American Autogenocide is the deliberate, systematic and legal murder of American citizens by socially-engineering the die-off of populations that are ‘problematic’ for the interests of wealth and power. Most victims prematurely die from social forces targeted at them to cause them to wear out by stress. This process is called ‘Weathering Away’ or ‘Attrition By Stress.’” [Footnote 11] Financial Terrorism is an illegal form of Warfare/Eugenics [Footnotes 11,12,13 & 14] listed as War Crimes in the Geneva Convention, the US Criminal Code, International Law & International Treatises, again, further crimes with life sentences or the DEATH PENALTY for punishment.

—–

[Footnotes 11,12,13,14 & 15]

[11]“THE NINE STAGES OF AMERICAN AUTOGENOCIDE” by Martha Rose Crow, M.S.

http://blacktalkradionetwork.com/profiles/blogs/americas-secret-updated-for

[12] Nuremberg Principle VI states,

“The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:

(a) Crimes against peace:

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;

(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

(b) War crimes:

Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation of slave labor or for any other purpose of the civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.

(c) Crimes against humanity: Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.”

[13] “Analysis of Financial Terrorism in America: Over 1 Million Deaths Annually, 62 Million People With Zero Net Worth, As the Economic Elite Make Off With $46 Trillion” by David DeGraw, founder and editor of AmpedStatus.com. The following report includes adapted excerpts from David DeGraw’s book, “The Road Through 2012: Revolution or World War III.” Release Date: 9.28.11 August 10, 2011

http://ampedstatus.org/exclusive-analysis-of-financial-terrorism-in-america-over-1-million-deaths-annually-62-million-people-with-zero-net-worth-as-the-economic-elite-make-off-with-46-trillion

[14]Eugenics is a form of Mass Genocide and Precluded in the Genocide Treaty signed by President Ronald Reagan. “Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: …(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

http://www.preventgenocide.org/law/convention/text.htm

[15]“Middle Class Death Watch — 33 Frightening Economic Developments Downward mobility, homelessness spreading to the middle class, 200,000 public employees laid off? Here are some frightening trends to keep an eye on.” by David DeGraw, AlterNet, September 18, 2011

—–

Fr0m footnote 5 herein, quote, “To call what is happening a ‘financial terrorist attack’ on the United States, is not using hyperbole, it is the technical term for what is currently occurring.” So here we have not Osama Bin Laden attacking the United States and World Markets but had Osama stolen off with TRILLIONS IN LOOT, certainly Americans would want a TRIAL and would want to RECOVER EVERY LAST PENNY OF THE STOLEN BOOTY. So what makes these US TERRORISTS disguised in suit and tie and licensed as Attorney at Law special, nothing, they have simply committed their crimes under the Cloak of the US Government and violated the TRUST of the PEOPLE, their oaths as Attorneys and Public Servants, as well a, OUR ALLIED NATIONS.

Anderson, again, a seasoned New York Supreme Court Attorney who worked in the New York Supreme Court Attorney Criminal Misconduct Regulatory Department, the very one charged with regulating Wall Street/Fraud Street Attorneys at Law, exposed how the CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATION operates and then shields themselves from prosecution in criminal scheme after criminal scheme. The RICO Organization is composed mainly of a small but powerful and influential group of DIRTY and UNETHICAL Law Firms and Attorneys at Law, operating virtually free of Prosecution. Actually, they act “Above the Law,” due to their illegal misuse of their privileged positions as Attorneys at Law, both in and Private Practice and disguised as Public Officials, to facilitate the crimes prosecution free. As Public Officials, they control and regulate virtually the entire System of Jurisprudence, misusing their TRUSTED positions to block any actions against the RICO Enterprise they belong to, including Whitewashing Attorney Criminal Complaints for its members, as Anderson reveals.

How do those charged with upholding law instead disable and sabotage the rule of law? By simply violating their SWORN OATHS OF OFFICE and MISUSING THEIR PUBLIC TRUST AS ATTORNEYS AT LAW, then Covering Up the crimes of the CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION when complaints are filed against them, effectuated through never-ending Violations of Public Office Rules & Regulations, Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conduct/Ethic Codes and State & Federal Law, as described by Whistleblower Anderson and others.

The Anderson sworn testimony of a massive government corruption gains further substantiation from corroborating evidence already presented to this Court, from yet another HEROIC New York Supreme Court Veteran Sr. Attorney and Expert in Attorney Criminal Misconduct Complaints, Whistleblower, Nicole Corrado Esq., (“Corrado”). Corrado also works for the NEW YORK SUPREME COURT in the ATTORNEY CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT DISCIPLINARY DEPARTMENT, again, the REGULATORY DEPARTMENT that regulates WALL STREET/FRAUD STREET ATTORNEYS AT LAW. In fact, the ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY that Anderson and Corrado work for is one of the highest outposts of legal regulation in New York and perhaps the nation. According to Anderson and Corrado, SENIOR RANKING OFFICIALS of the New York Supreme Court Attorney CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT and Disciplinary Departments, intentionally and in conspiracy with other Senior Public Officials, worked to disable a number of State & Federal Agencies by “WHITEWASHING” complaints according to Anderson, CRIMINAL and ETHICAL complaints, including those filed against their friends in high places. The “WHITEWASH” of complaints achieved by Obstructing Justice, Destroying Evidence in Federal and State Proceedings, Threatening Federal Witnesses and more, all committed by PUBLIC OFFICIALS, as further evidenced herein. Further cover-up corruption in the Anderson Lawsuit, in the most extreme form, occurs when a Senior Official of the New York Supreme Court, in classic Racketeering behavior, THREATENS Federal Witness Corrado to silence her, according to Sworn Statements already submitted and docketed in the Court Record of Anderson and this Lawsuit.

Yet another Heroic Whistleblower that testified at the New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings with Anderson and Plaintiff, comes from a Sitting New York State Supreme Court Justice, Honorable Duane A. Hart, Esquire [Footnote 16]. In his Testimony, Hon. Hart refers to the heads of the ETHIC Departments in New York, the highest outpost of Attorney at Law Criminal and Ethical Misconduct Complaints in the following demeanor, quote,

SENATOR PERKINS: Yeah, thank you so much. I have to run, but I just want to ask one quick question. So what’s the solution?

JUSTICE HART: Well, firstly, you have to fire Tembeckjian [Robert H. Tembeckjian Administrator and Counsel, New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct] and Friedberg [Alan W. Friedberg, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court First Department Appellate Division - Departmental Disciplinary Committee]. [Footnote 17] I mean, I’ve got to tell you, I’ve been a trial attorney or a judge, again, pushing 30 years. The only reason that Robert Tembeckjian, in my opinion ~- so I don’t get sued – isn’t the sleaziest attorney I’ve ever met is because I’ve met Alan Friedberg. (Laughter)

JUSTICE HART: Well the system – if the system works properly, it’s fair. But anyone, any system that doesn’t have the goodwill of the people who are running it behind it is going to fail no matter what you do.

So while I agree with my friend Senator Perkins that this isn’t about character assassination, it’s about getting a fair, equitable system — and frankly, in the hands of people like Mr. Ternbeckjian and Mr. Friedberg, you’ll never have it. You could put whatever —you could change the system however you want, you’ve got to have people in there who are fair, who are ethical.

I mean, again, my — Mr. Tembeckjian — and again, I believe I submitted it to you on an earlier day, when my brother told Mr. Tembeckjian that he had to follow certain a rule of ethics [a certain rule of ethics], Mr. Tembeckjian actually wrote back to my brother saying that there are no ethics that he has to follow. And — am I correct?

CHAIRMAN SAMPSON:

I hear your point, Your Honor.

—–

A Shakespearean Legal Comedy/Tragedy of Government Corruption Gone Wild now exposed by these WHISTLEBLOWERS, a TOTAL DESECRATION OF LAW TOP DOWN, very similar to the current situation in this Court, with JUSTICES OF THIS COURT ILLEGALLY HANDLING THIS LAWSUIT WHILE BEING CRIMINALLY COMPLAINED OF REGARDING THEIR INVOLVEMENT IN THE CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE EXPOSED. The Testimonies from CREDIBLE EYE WITNESS EXPERTS working within the LEGAL SYSTEM expose what is happening in this Court and the Prosecutorial Offices, as a situation analogous to with what happened to Concentration Camp Victims in Nazi Germany who pleaded to the NAZI Courts and the Gestapo for Justice, complaining of the Abuses & Torture of the Camp Guards and the Gestapo. As all those they pleaded to for help were part of the NAZI COUP, the Victims therefore stood no chance of Justice wherever they turned, completely denied Due Process or Procedure, just as in this Court and the Agencies fingered by Anderson, including Members of the Department of Justice.

—–

[Footnote 16 & 17]

[16] New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing Transcripts – June 08, 2009 & September 24, 2009 – Hart Testimony p. 83-102, hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein @

[Footnote 17]

[17] When Plaintiff later filed CRIMINAL and ETHICAL COMPLAINTS against Friedberg and others, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Department lost them. In Plaintiff’s testimony to the NY Senate Judiciary Committee, Chairman Sampson confronts Friedberg as to where Plaintiff’s complaints against he and his Cronies are, Friedberg states he will get back to the Committee with what has happened to the missing complaints. Instead, Friedberg sends Plaintiff a letter dismissing the complaints against himself and his Cronies. Yes, Friedberg literally dismissed his own complaint, violating just about every Ethical Rule and NY State Law regarding Conflict of Interest, Obstruction of Justice and Fair and Impartial Due Process.

—–

C. THE CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF WORLD MARKETS BY ATTORNEYS AT LAW OPERATING AS A CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE AND INFILTRATING SENIOR PUBLIC OFFICES, INCLUDING WITHIN THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND THE COURTS

You Are a Den of Vipers and Thieves

Gentlemen, I have had men watching you for a long time and I am convinced that you have used the funds of the bank to speculate in the breadstuffs of the country.

When you won, you divided the profits amongst you, and when you lost, you charged it to the bank.

You tell me that if I take the deposits from the bank and annul its charter, I shall ruin ten thousand families. That may be true, gentlemen, but that is your sin! Should I let you go on, you will ruin fifty thousand families, and that would be my sin!

You are a den of vipers and thieves.”

— Andrew Jackson (7th US President, when forcing the closure of the Second Bank of the US in 1836 by revoking its charter)

In order to fully understand how the country is being robbed, and by whom, one must understand the FINANCIAL FRAUDS ONGOING on Wall Street/Fraud Street through the eyes of the Whistleblowers, FRAUDS that are destroying Main Street, committed by CRIMINAL LAW FIRMS, filled with CRIMINALS operating as licensed ATTORNEYS AT LAW in a myriad of Public and Private roles. One sees clearly that behind the Mass of Crimes plaguing our nation are RICO Operatives with LEGAL DEGREES in a variety of CRITICAL ROLES necessary to commit the crimes and evade prosecution. There are Private Sector Law Firms and Attorneys at Law, creating the underlying documentation and contracts necessary for the FRAUDS. These Private Law Firms then have other Criminal Attorney at Law Operatives who often travel through a revolving door into Government Regulatory Agencies with a mission to DE-REGULATE and TURN THE OTHER WAY if Red Flags arise.  [Footnote 18 & 19]  Other Operatives disguised as Lawmakers push Legislation to Lower Regulations and simultaneously water down prosecutorial legislation so as they may operate with the false perception that the crimes were legal. This subversion of the Regulatory Agencies paves the way for the COMPLEX ILLEGAL FINANCIAL FRAUDS to take place without the Public Noticing. Other CRIMINAL RICO Operatives revolve through the Courts in various roles, including dressed as Justices, to bury any legal actions against the Criminal Organization. Other RICO Operatives travel through the Criminal Revolving Door from the Private Law Firms into other Government offices to SUBTERFUGE any PUBLIC AGENCIES where the Victims of their crimes may seek Relief (i.e. DOJ, SEC, FINRA, etc.), further shielding them from PROSECUTION.

—–

[Footnotes 18 & 19]

[18] “In Aftermath of Financial Crisis, Who’s Being Held Responsible?” PBS News Hour by Ray Suarez

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qmO7W8iC5LE&noredirect=1

[19] “Insight: Top Justice officials connected to mortgage banks - - U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Lanny Breuer, head of the Justice Department’s criminal division, were partners for years at a Washington law firm [Covington & Burling] that represented a Who’s Who of big banks and other companies at the center of alleged foreclosure fraud, a Reuters inquiry shows.” By Scot J. Paltrow, Reuters, Fri Jan 20, 2012

http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/20/us-usa-holder-mortgage-idUSTRE80J0PH20120120

—–

Examples of COMPLEX ILLEGAL LEGAL CRIMES CONCOCTED by these DIRTY ROTTEN UNETHICAL ATTORNEYS AT LAW that directly relate to the ONGOING DEPRESSION THE NATION SUFFERS FROM, include but are not limited to;

1. FRAUDULENT INSURANCE CONTRACTS produced by Attorneys at Law from the CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE LAW FIRMS, whereby AIG for example then sets the stage for a CONTROLLED ECONOMIC CALAMITY in World Markets through these FRAUDULENT INSURANCE CONTRACTS, to

2. FRAUDULENT SUBPRIME MORTGAGES and PREDATORY LENDING Contracts, again prepared by the CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE LAW FIRMS steeped in FRAUD and sold by the RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION CORPORATE PARTNERS, to

3. FRAUDULENT Collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), contracts again created by the CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE LAW FIRMS working with Bankers to cause controlled economic calamity with scienter and profiting from the downfall of markets, to

4. FRAUDULENTLY BUNDLED DERIVATIVES, whereby again, we have Lawyers working with Investment Bankers to create FRAUDULENT CONTRACTS to cause controlled economic calamity with scienter and profiting from the downfall of the markets, to

5. FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURES in part caused by all of the above Frauds and whereby HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF HOMEOWNERS and INVESTORS WORLDWIDE are being burned through FRAUDULENT FORECLOSURE DOCUMENTS produced by the CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE LAW FIRMS. Every American who owns a home has been burned by these crimes, as their home values plummeted due directly to these crimes, losing 50% or more on their value, steeping them into economic hardship. Each homeowner in America should sue the banks, law firms, lawyers, regulators and judges who are responsible for the crimes that led to their losses. Foreclosure Documents signed with FRAUDULENT SIGNATURES signed by Attorneys at Law in the Criminal RICO Organizations Foreclosure Mills. Criminals disguised as Attorneys at Law are further disguised as Judges found rubber-stamping the FRAUDULENT CONCOCTIONS and still other Criminals disguised as Attorneys at Law further disguised as Regulators Feigning to be “Asleep at the Wheel” leaving the victims homeless and with massive losses of personal assets from CRIME and with no RECOURSE in the Courts and Prosecutorial Offices, as they are now run by the Criminals [Footnote 20], to

—–

[Footnote 20]

[1] “Foreclosure fraud investigators forced out at attorney general’s office” By Kimberly Miller, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer Tuesday, July 12, 2011

http://www.palmbeachpost.com/money/foreclosures/foreclosure-fraud-investigators-forced-out-at-attorney-generals-1603854.html?page=2

and

Office of the Attorney General Economic Crimes Division – “UNFAIR, DECEPTIVE AND UNCONSCIONABLE ACTS IN FORECLOSURE CASES” Prepared by: June M. Clarkson, Theresa B. Edwards and Rene D. Harrod of the Florida Attorney General Office

http://www.scribd.com/doc/46278738/Florida-Attorney-General-Fraudclosure-Report-Unfair-Deceptive-and-Unconscionable-Acts-in-Foreclosure-Cases

and

“Revealed: How Countrywide and Angelo Mozilo Crashed the Housing Market without Punishment” By Damien Hoffman, December 05 2011

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/revealed-how-countrywide-and-angelo-mozilo-crashed-the-housing-market-without-punishment.html/

Video 1 - http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7390540n – CBS NEWS

Video 2 - http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7390542n – CBS NEWS

and

“Lawyers Investigating SEC Madoff Frauds Provide Help to Fellow Lawyers Eight SEC employees disciplined over failures in Madoff fraud case; none are fired”, The Washington Post by David S. Hilzenrath - November 11, 2011

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2011/11/lawyers-investigating-sec-madoff-frauds.html

and

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/seven-sec-employees-disciplined-on-failure-to-stop-madoff-fraud/2011/11/10/gIQA3kYYCN_story.html

—–

6. FRAUDULENT TARP FUNDS, whereby the losses for the CRIMINAL SCHEMES above were then portrayed to the WORLD as ORGANIC ECONOMIC CALAMITIES NEEDING “BAILOUTS” from the PUBLIC to fund the Criminal RICO Organizations Crimes. Companies cited as “TOO BIG TO FAIL”, a term which by definition is a call for BREAKUP THROUGH ANTITRUST LAWS, not a reason to make them bigger with bogus bailouts that they then used to bonus their fat greed soaked porker faces, to

7. FRAUDULENT DEBT CEILING NEGOTIATIONS TO FURTHER DISABLE MARKETS with the aid of the Criminal RICO Organization’s Operatives that subverted the RATING AGENCIES to make all of the above criminal contracts AAA rated [Footnote 21], Sinking World Markets from the FRAUDULENT RATINGS, to

—–

[Footnote 21]

[21] “MOODY’S ANALYST BREAKS SILENCE: Says Ratings Agency Rotten To Core With Conflicts” by Henry Blodget at Business Insider, Inc. August 19, 2011

http://www.businessinsider.com/moodys-analyst-conflicts-corruption-and-greed-2011-8 Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/moodys-analyst-conflicts-corruption-and-greed-2011-8#ixzz1VhH71l3r

and

“Comment on SEC Proposed Rules for Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations – File No. S7-18-11 by William J. Harrington”

http://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-18-11/s71811-33.pdf

—–

8. FRAUDULENT WARS OF AGGRESSION based on LIE after LIE for War Profiteering, to

9. ILLEGAL OIL PRICE FIXING and PROFITEERING, to

10. MARKET RIGGING, that has decreased the Middle Class Portfolios to Poverty, to

11. ANTITRUST VIOLATIONS that have wiped out the Middle Class and Small Businesses.

ECONOMIC CALAMITIES caused directly through CONSPIRATORIAL FRAUD. Whereby LAWMAKERS, more aptly, LAWBREAKERS in CONGRESS, almost all Attorneys at Law are bought or placed in their roles through FRAUDULENT ELECTIONS by the CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE. These LAWBREAKER/CONGRESSIONAL CRIMINALS travel through a REVOLVING DOOR from CONGRESS to the “FAVORED LAW FIRMS” or vice versa. THEY HAVE ROBBED US CITIZENS further by SHIFTING THE LOSS FOR THE CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISES CRIMES TO THE PEOPLE and onto the BACKS OF THEIR CHILDREN’S FUTURE.

Members of the CRIMINAL RICO LAW FIRMS infiltrate KEY CONGRESSIONAL POSTS, in order to design for example, a MULTITRILLION DOLLAR FRAUD called TARP. The Congressional Criminals create False Debt Ceilings debates, a false sense of bankruptcy, etc. to further ROB the PEOPLE through Budget Cuts, most cuts in areas where they could be prosecuted for their crimes. The very same Congressional Criminals that destroyed the ECONOMIES of the WORLD then claim the People need to tighten their belts and cut their “entitlements,” [Footnote 22] cuts directly due to the losses from their crimes, whilst their belts burst in Greed. Instead, the People must simply RESTORE JUSTICE, tighten the NOOSES around the CRIMINALS necks and simply RECOVER the STOLEN LOOT from their swaying carcasses, which again, would instantly put the Country back in black overnight.

—–

[Footnote 22]

[22] The word Entitlements needs further clarification here, as there are two distinct confusing meanings. The first meaning “is a guarantee of access to benefits based on established rights or by legislation. A “right” is itself an entitlement associated with a moral or social principle, such that an “entitlement” is a provision made in accordance with legal framework of a society”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entitlement In this usage, an Entitlement is akin to a worker paying for and buying, with REAL HARD EARNED MONEY through REAL HARD WORK, benefits such as Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid and Unemployment Insurance. For these future promises to pay REAL FUNDS ARE DEDUCTED OUT OF EVERY REAL PAYCHECK OF THE WORKER THROUGHOUT LIFE, used to BUY GUARANTEED and FUNDED BENEFITS LATER. Here we have Workers PURCHASING an Government Insurance PRODUCT via Contract, not some sort of freeloading of benefits in any gifted or undeserved manner and factually workers are legally entitled to those PAID FOR FUTURE BENEFITS.

The Second Definition of Entitlement, “In a casual sense, the term ‘entitlement’ refers to a notion or belief that one (or oneself) is deserving of some particular reward or benefit—if given without deeper legal or principled cause, the term is often given with pejorative connotation (e.g. a ‘sense of entitlement’)”. This second usage is strikingly different from the first in that here there is NO LEGAL Entitlement to a Future Purchased Benefit, just a “sense”, which would be akin to say an unearned “TRUST FUND BABIES TRUST FUND”, where the benefactors inherit, not earn or pay for, the “entitled by birth” benefits. The only Entitlements necessary to cut in society are these type of UNEARNED or UNPAID FOR ENTITLEMENTS and BENEFITS but that would leave most of Congress needing a second job and purchasing the crap insurance of “Obama UnCare” versus their “Entitled” platinum plated Congressional Insurance Policies. Of course, our politicians and their families should have Platinum Plans for they earned it by bankrupting the Nation and World Economies? In other words, the only ones who appear to live off UNEARNED ENTITLEMENTS are those ROBBING the AMERICAN WORKERS of their HARD EARNED BENEFITS THEY PAID FOR AND ARE LEGALLY ENTITLED TO.

Another “entitlement” to cut would be “Trust Funds” as with estates currently passing 100% free of Death Taxes through further ILLEGAL DEREGULATIONS, we factually have a Monarchy. As if a Kings were passing the Kingdom, the United States, to their “entitled” children, who then pass it to theirs, further skewing the money supply, spoiling each successive generation until they are “rotten to the core” and let the GOOD PEOPLE who worked hard to get them their “entitled” positions, STARVE. Instead, as this is America and not the English Monarchy we freed ourselves from yesteryear, when someone who has “made it” dies with a billion, a small portion should pass to their next generation through a 90% estate tax, which in this instance would leave a whopping 100 Million Dollars to their heirs. Even this amount is not enough for these greedy ROBBER BABY BARONS where they currently have rigged the money supply further by passing all 1 BILLION free of tax. In the instance of a 90% estate tax, the remainder of the taxed monies, $900 Million, would return to the common money pool for the next big earners/inventors to earn and to pay for the PAID ENTITLEMENTS of the PEOPLE who WORKED HARD and are LEGALLY ENTITLED TO THEM.

Plaintiff fears however that like with the Good King, the People will have to have a real “Tea Party” again. Not to be confused with the Unpatriotic Tea Party of today’s politics but a true REVOLUTION and REVOLT against these “ENTITLED” SPOILED ROTTEN ELITIST TYRANTS WITH HARVARD AND YALE BOUGHT LEGAL DEGREES, whose legacy is to have decimated and destroyed our Great Nation, her People and her Honor. In Revolt the PEOPLE should carefully dissect those ELITISTS who inherited their wealth or gained it from CRIMINAL ACTS from those who WORKED HARD in legitimate positions to EARN such Wealth when TAKING BACK THE ILL GOTTEN GAINS.

The Entitlement SCAM appears yet another CRIME perpetrated against the PEOPLE by our “Elite” Congressional Criminals (elite only in the entitled “sense”) to rob funds set aside by workers for PAID FOR SOCIAL BENEFITS and now claim that the workers were not “entitled” to these PAID FOR BENEFITS, as if these were social welfare claims like their trust funds. Whereby the monies paid for by WORKERS throughout their LIFETIMES with LEGAL PROMISE TO PAY at RETIREMENT or if they become UNEMPLOYED are being kiped and pilfered by those “TRUST FUND BABIES” from Harvard and Yale, mostly who are running or more aptly ruining and robbing the Country, in delusions of grandeur, perhaps from too many “entitlements”. Those who have hardly worked a day in their lives and who do not pay any taxes, again we find robbing hard working Americans while making huge gains for themselves and the RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION.

—–

What do the PEOPLE have from all of these FRAUDS?

1. INTENTIONALLY WRECKED WORLD ECONOMIES,

2. Decreased home equity by 40-60%,

3. 8 million-20 million homeless from wholly fraudulent foreclosures,

4. 30-75 million unemployed from the wholly illegal market rigging, antitrust violations (ie Walmart, etc.) and company collapses (ie Lehman),

5. 401k’s and Stock Portfolio’s hammered to nothing,

6. Pensions left in shambles [Footnote 23],

—–

[Footnote 23]

[23] “Madoff Whistleblower: Big Banks Are Ripping Off Pension Funds.” By Peter Gorenstein | Daily Ticker August 19, 2001

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/madoff-whistleblower-big-banks-ripping-off-pension-funds-152836936.html

and

“Will the Attorneys General Sell Out the Pension Funds?” by Abigail Caplovitz Field, TheHuffingtonPost.com, Inc.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/abigail-caplovitz-field

—–

7. City, States, Counties and Countries wrecked by fraudulent legal instruments and illegal legal scams, and,

8. Food and oil prices fixed to starve the People and wipe out the Middle Class.

All of these Economic Hardships the result of Economic Terrorism and directly resulting from Conspiratorial Criminal Demolitions and again all UNPROSECUTED. All of the crimes are achievable only with a Degree in Law MisUsed, which becomes a license to steal. Look no further for example then the SKYROCKETING Net Worth increases of our Government Elite, our Pork Filled Politicians [Footnote 24] and their Corporate PIG Partners. Their increase in wealth corresponds almost identically to the amount of monies stolen from the PEOPLE through these swindles and through the RIGGED CRIMINAL COLLAPSES OF ECONOMIES. This uneven distribution/skewing of the money supply between the haves and the have not’s is due entirely to CRIMINAL ACTS and has become worse than any other point in history. [Footnote 25]

—–

[Footnote 24 & 25]

[24] “The 50 Richest Members of Congress (2011)” “To determine the richest lawmakers, Roll Call adds up the minimum value of total assets reported by each Member on their annual financial disclosures and subtracts the minimum liabilities. Percent change refers to the change since last year’s disclosure forms. An asset valued at $5 million to $25 million is counted at the lesser amount, as is a liability valued at $1 million to $5 million.” August 22, 2011

http://www.rollcall.com/50richest/the-50-richest-members-of-congress-112th.html

and

[25] “The Shocking, Graphic Data That Shows Exactly What Motivates the Occupy Movement

The corporate media may obsess about what Occupy Wall Street is all about, but these images should make it clear.” AlterNet / By Les Leopold, October 23, 2011

—–

The CRIMINALS in the RICO Enterprise cloaked as ATTORNEYS AT LAW, act behind the scenes, further profiting from the controlled demolition of the US and Foreign Markets and Fortune 1000 Companies by betting against the PEOPLE and having INSIDE INFORMATION that the markets will collapse from each controlled demolition. From the wreckage however, one finds new instant BILLIONAIRES and RECORD CORPORATE PROFITS of a select few, about 1/10 of 1% of the Population, an increase in wealth that almost directly correlates to the TRILLIONS of DOLLARS LOOTED by their CRIMES.

Sky-Rocketing Net Worth Increases, include but are not limited to,

1. Lawmakers from all Political Parties, mainly Attorneys at Law,

2. Judges, again almost all Attorneys at Law,

3. Public Officials, again almost all Attorneys at Law, collecting their compensation upon exiting Public Office in Lucrative Instant Partnerships with the “Favored Law Firms” and,

4. CEO’s of the RICO Enterprise’s Controlled Companies, again almost all Attorneys at Law, here taking bonuses for the Criminal RICO Organization while wiping out shareholders, employees, etc.

All of these CRIMINALS stealing for the CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE and themselves hundreds of Billions/TRILLIONS in Salary and Bonuses for the Criminal Enterprise by Robbing, Raping and Destroying America’s “Apple Pie” institutions and running them into the ground. Why have these PIGS given themselves Bonuses? For all of the following reasons they should have been FIRED and IMPRISONED instead, including for all of the following;

1. bankrupting Fortune 1000 companies,

2. rigging and destroying world mortgage markets,

3. rigging and destroying world stock markets,

4. rigging global economies to collapse [Footnote 26] and

—–

[Footnote 26]

[26] Further, supporting evidence of this CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE committing MASS FRAUD can be found in the April 13, 2011, Report by the United States Senate, PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. The Committee is Chaired by Hon. Carl Levin and assisted in bipartisan fashion by Tom Coburn, Ranking Minority Member and is titled WALL STREET AND THE FINANCIAL CRISIS: ANATOMY OF A FINANCIAL COLLAPSE. The Report is located at the following URL, hereby fully incorporated in entirety by reference herein,

This detailed stinging report alleges fraud over 200 times in 650 pages, yet still NOT A SINGLE ARREST??? While most of this Criminal Activity defined in the report continues to take place in New York, and why not, when the “Fox” and “Fix”’ is in the Henhouse with this Court? Crime Pays when no one is protecting the People and Justice is complicit in the crimes. One must ask where are the US Attorneys, the New York Attorney General and the Governor of New York, the self-proclaimed “Sheriffs of Wall Street”, whom instead look more like Criminal Accomplices disguised as Sheriffs. Who are these “Barney Fife” Sheriffs? Again, we find more ATTORNEYS AT LAW, all with interests in the CONTROLLED DEMOLITION of the markets, betting against the People in rigged market collapses, fearing no Justice as they have disabled Justice.

and

“Is the SEC Covering Up Wall Street Crimes? A whistleblower claims that over the past two decades, the agency has destroyed records of thousands of investigations, whitewashing the files of some of the nation’s worst financial criminals.” By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone; Jann S. Wenner, Editor and Publisher August 17, 2011

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/is-the-sec-covering-up-wall-street-crimes-20110817

and

“SEC may have destroyed documents, says senator Grassley: Agency may have got rid of Goldman, Madoff documents” “The Securities and Exchange Commission may have destroyed documents and compromised enforcement cases involving activity at large banks and hedge funds during the height of the financial crisis in 2008, according to allegations made by a lawmaker on Wednesday.” By Ronald D. Orol, (MarketWatch) August 18, 2011

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/sec-may-have-destroyed-documents-senator-says-2011-08-17

“Why Isn’t Wall Street in Jail? Financial crooks brought down the world’s economy — but the feds are doing more to protect them than to prosecute them.” By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone; Jann S. Wenner, Editor and Publisher

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-isnt-wall-street-in-jail-20110216

and

“Why Do Dangerous Financial Criminals Roam Free? Prosecutors like Eric Schneiderman need cops on the beat to put financial crooks behind bars. But thanks to Bush, these cops are missing in action.” By June Carbone, Alternet, February 4, 2012

and

“William Black: Why Nobody Went to Jail During the Credit Crisis — The FBI is no longer chasing white collar criminals” by James J Puplava CFP with William K Black PhD at Financial Sense®

http://www.financialsense.com/financial-sense-newshour/guest-expert/2011/09/14/william-k-black-phd/why-nobody-went-to-jail-during-the-credit-crisis#.Toz2nH9u1OU.email

and

“If Mortgage Fraud Was Rampant, Why Aren’t [there] Criminal Charges?” By Matt Egan, Published May 06, 2011, FOXBusiness

and

“WW3 is on as Wall St. banks plunder economy.” Max Keiser, YOUTUBE (or aptly ELIOTUBE)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZindTx0YDA&feature=player_embedded

and

“Obama: Banks broke no laws broken…More shameless than Bush” by Max Keiser

http://www.realecontv.com/videos/government-corruption/obama-banks-broke-no-laws-broken.html

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ks-sc4LYqck&feature=player_embedded

[Obama tries to Cover-Up for Economic Terrorism committed by his Republican Wall Street backers, keep in mind he has raised more money for the 2012 election from Republican Wall Streeters than all of the Republican Candidates in toto] see,

and

“Wall Street Still Gives More Cash to Obama Than to Republicans” by Noreen Malone, New York Media LLC. October 20, 2011

and

“Meltdown - The men who crashed the world” Part 1-4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zZ_JfROhOE&feature=player_embedded

and

“The Failure to Prosecute Bank Crimes Creates a Disease at the Heart of Our Politics” By: David Dayen, Firedoglake, Monday February 6, 2012

http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/02/06/the-failure-to-prosecute-bank-crimes-creates-a-disease-at-the-heart-of-our-politics

and

“Deficiencies Found in Oversight of Seized Assets, U.S. Says” By Seth Stern - Sep 13, 2011, BLOOMBERG L.P.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-13/deficiencies-found-in-oversight-of-seized-assets-u-s-says.html

—–

5. rigging illegal wars of aggression for war and oil profiteering.

All crimes and cover-ups done with scienter against the American People and People Worldwide, all done in criminal conspiracy, all done with the aid of insiders inside the Cogs of Justice and Government. These controlled demolitions of world economies created through FRAUD, have intentionally BANKRUPTED the US and World markets and caused FRAUDULENT ECONOMIC DEPRESSIONS on Citizens worldwide. Again, all of this CRIMINAL HAVOC to the benefit of a CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE, all further caused by MASS CRIMINAL ACTS committed by mostly ATTORNEYS AT LAW and their CORPORATE CLIENTELE, ending with Attorneys at Law behind the TORTURING OF HUMAN BEINGS and WAGING ILLEGAL UNDECLARED WARS OF AGGRESSION. [Footnote 27]  Tens of Thousands being Tortured Worldwide whom are not TERRORISTS, or we would have tried them proudly in our Just System, but instead mostly these people those who oppose the United States’ UNDECLARED and ILLEGAL WARS OF AGGRESSIONS in their Countries, whose PROPERTY RIGHTS IN THEIR COUNTRIES HAVE BEEN STOLEN, dissenters sent to Camp Gitmoschwitz or Abu GraHell or some other Black site. Some of those being TORTURED currently are tortured for their HEROIC WHISTLEBLOWING ATTEMPTS, such as PFC Bradley Manning, Julian Assange, Christine C. Anderson, Nicole Corrado, Hon. Judge Hart, etc., whom through PATRIOTIC DISSENT HAVE EXPOSED THE CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATIONS CRIMES. Yet, we know live in a United States where Dissent is no longer a form of Patriotism but rather a Criminal Act.

—–

[Footnote 27]

[27] “Bush, Blair found guilty of war crimes - A War Crimes Tribunal in Malaysia has found former US President George W. Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair guilty of war crimes for their roles in the Iraq war.” November 23, 2011by PressTV

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/211590.html

and

“The Torture Memos: just following orders, just following [LEGAL] advice?” Posted on July 12, 2011 by Richard Moorhead Law Professor at Cardiff University, LAWYERS WATCH

http://lawyerwatch.wordpress.com/2011/07/12/the-torture-memos-just-following-orders-just-following-advice/

and

“United States: Investigate Bush, Other Top Officials for Torture - Inquiry Into 2 Deaths in CIA Custody Insufficient” by Human Rights Watch July 11, 2011

http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2011/07/11/united-states-investigate-bush-other-top-officials-torture

and

“John F. Kennedy 2 - The George H. W. Bush Connection-Full Length Documentary - The sequel to Oliver Stone’s JFK, you won’t see in the cinema. A thoroughly documented criminal indictment establishing beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of George H.W. Bush as a supervisor in the conspiracy to assassinate John Kennedy.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAQ5mFkrlDs&feature=autoshare

and

“Bush Family, C.I.A., Nazi Connection” October 28, 2007 -

http://www.myspace.com/270351075/blog/323241558

and

In 1939, Harriman and Prescott hired the Dulles brothers [law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell -] to hide Nazi involvement with U.B.C. [Union Banking Corporation] because they knew the things they had done were not in the best interest of America. But it didn’t work and U.B.C. was seized by the federal government on Nov. 17, 1942, under the Trading with the Enemy Act. The bank was a money laundering operation for Hitler. Prescott [Bush] was also forced to give up support to his favorite political ally Hitler. Prescott went to a Congress Hearing to try to get his Bank back. J. Edgar Hoover told him [Prescott Bush, Father to George HW Bush and GrandNaziFather to George W. (WarCriminal) Bush], “That’s right your a Nazi, and you run a Nazi Bank.” Prescott was denied request to keep the bank and the bank was seized. There were many other American & British Elite that funded Hitler & the Nazi’s rise to power. Henry Ford of Ford Motor Company, The Rockefeller family of Standard Oil, Thomas Watson of IBM, J. P. Morgan, Coca Cola, General Motors, The Rothschild Banking Family of England , etc… etc…etc… How do you think Germany built a Military big enough to take on the world in about a 10 year period?

[Note that many of these same UnAmerican, UnPatriotic, Fascist, Nazi Fry Loving, Spoiled Rotten SellOut’s who attempted the Current Coup on the United States are these same UNPATRIOTIC families. See Business Plot I for more information @ http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/Coup.htm ]

and

Jason Bermas presents “Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined” produced by Alex Jones,

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E&feature=bf_play&list=FLtle4CeXy9TI&index=1

and

“The High Priests of Globalisation” Will Hutton

http://www.bilderberg.org/

and

Agenda 21, EUGENICS “taking lives considered not worthy to be lived

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5cu_5uoQ18

“Transcript: Interview with U.N. torture official Manfred Novak” By Glenn Greenwald, Salon Media Group, Inc. Saturday, Apr 25, 2009

—–

monkeys

D. WHERE IS THE JUSTICE? THE CRIMINAL ROLE OF THIS COURT IN AIDING AND ABETTING THE CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE

“Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematic plan of reducing [a people] to slavery.” — Thomas Jefferson

Let’s face it, there is no DEPRESSION as the economic numbers would appear to reflect, there is very little organic economic downturn at all, instead what we have here are CRIMINAL ACTS leading directly to the COLLAPSE of the United States and Foreign Nations for the benefit of 1/10 of 1% of the population. Instead what is found are THE KEYSTONE KOPS, aka the CRIMINAL ACCOMPLICES, composed of Lawmakers, Regulators, Prosecutors and Judges, all acting like the Three Wise Monkeys who see, hear and speak no evil, pick-pocketing world markets for the Criminal RICO Enterprise aka CRIME INC., which has subverted the United States Government and certain FOREIGN NATIONS. A TREASONOUS NEW WORLD DISORDER CONSPIRATORIAL COUP D’ÉTAT where Justice Officials intentionally look the other way to disable justice, or attempt to find ways to let their Criminal Brethren off the hook through further CRIMINAL ACTS and COVER-UPS. One finds our lawmakers and enforcers instead of upholding law, busy issuing “Get Out of Jail Free” cards for friends and family caught along the way, under the guise of “Immunity” or “Executive Privileges.” Where those tricks fail one finds them attempting to rewrite Laws to make their Crimes legal after the fact [Footnote 28,29 & 30], just like the Nazi Attorneys at Law tried at the “Nuremberg Judges Trial” [Footnote 31] and all the while lining their pockets in stolen funds and ECONOMICALLY TERRORIZING PEOPLE WORLDWIDE THROUGH ECONOMIC WARFARE WAGED UPON THEM, ignoring or harassing any Whistleblowers or Do-gooders seeking honest Justice. [Footnote 32]

keystoner-cops

—–

[Footnote 28,29,30,31 & 32]

[28] “AG [New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman] booted from key mtge. Panel” By MARK DECAMBRE, The New York Post, August 24, 2011

[29] “Obama Admin Blocks Bank Investigations?” Uploaded by TheYoungTurks on Aug 22, 2011, YOUTUBE (Should be ELIOTTUBE as YOUTUBE is one of the largest infringers of Plaintiff Bernstein’s Video Inventions)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL63bki4kzk&feature=player_embedded

[30] “Obama Goes All Out For Dirty Banker Deal” by Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone; Jann S. Wenner, editor and publisher, August 24, 2011 | 11:17am

http://m.rollingstone.com/entry/view/id/16196/pn/all/p/0/?KSID=bcdc270d2877e6d6e53699d382c34a8c

[31] “The Nuremberg Trials: The Justice Trial” United States of America v. Alstötter et al.

(”The Justice Case”) 3 T.W.C. 1 (1948), 6 L.R.T.W.C. 1 (1948), 14 Ann. Dig. 278 (1948).

The Justice Trial is one of the most interesting of the Nuremberg trials. The trial of sixteen defendants, members of the Reich Ministry of Justice or People’s and Special Courts, raised the issue of what responsibility judges might have for enforcing grossly unjust–but arguably binding–laws. The trial was the inspiration for the movie Judgment at Nuremberg. The movie presented a somewhat fictionalized view of the trial.

[32] “Florida attorney general, two fired lawyers in public dispute” July 21, 2011|By Kathleen Haughney, Sun Sentinel

http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2011-07-21/business/fl-bondi-fired-attorneys-react-20110721_1_foreclosure-fraud-clarkson-division-director

—–

Yet, the Crimes and Country are Fixable with a simple return to TRUTH, JUSTICE and the AMERICAN WAY of Law and Order, “NO ONE ABOVE THE LAW”, which Plaintiff believes is soon upon us, where the office no longer attempts to sanctify the Holder [Footnote 33] and the monies looted will be RECOVERED for the PEOPLE. For example, with a RICO CRIMINAL SUIT against those who organized and participated in the TREASONOUS and TYRANNOUS COUP D’ÉTAT, including CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY and ECONOMIC WARFARE, acting both within and outside government, the UNITED STATES would RECOVER BACK TO THE PEOPLE TRILLIONS of LOOT stolen via these TRAITOROUS and TREASONOUS ECONOMIC and WAR CRIMES. A clean sweep of all of the CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATIONS ASSETS and INDIVIDUAL ASSETS as RICO permits, just as the Justice Department did in the Gotti RICO Criminal Enterprise, leaving Gotti to die penniless in prison and his La Famiglia Criminal Empire extinct and broke. Yet, where is Justice now despite the mounds of evidence against this Criminal Cartel operating inside government, at the helm of our country, who have stolen more money from the People than the Mob in the past decade, this lack of JUSTICE leading to the true moral decay of our country?

—–

[Footnote 33]

[33] John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton, KCVO, DL aka John Dalberg-Acton, 8th Bt aka Lord Acton

“No doubt the responsibility in such a case is shared by those who ask for a thing. But if the thing is criminal, if, for instance, it is a licence to commit adultery, the person who authorises the act shares the guilt of the person who commits it. Here again what I have said is not in any way mysterious or esoteric. It appeals to no hidden code. It aims at no secret moral. It supposes nothing, and implies nothing but what is universally current and familiar. It is the common, even the vulgar, code I appeal to.

I cannot accept your canon that we are to judge Pope and King [or US Presidents, Judges, Regulators, etc.] unlike other men, with a favourable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption it is the other way, against the holders of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it.” Here are the greatest names coupled with the greatest crimes; you would spare those criminals, for some mysterious reason. I would hang them higher than Haman, for reasons of quite obvious justice, still more, still higher for the sake of historical science.

http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1407&Itemid=283

—–

How has Justice been derailed and by whom? Whistleblower Anderson et al., expose the tip of the Iceberg of the underbelly of the CRIMINAL RICO ENTERPRISE operating inside Government. Revealing a select group of CRIMINALS, again disguised as Attorneys at Law, operating as, State and Federal Justices, United States Department of Justice Officials, New York State Attorney General Officials, District Attorney Officials, New York State Supreme Court Officials, “Favored Law Firms & Lawyers” and both Federal & State Regulators. This elaborate network of Government Operatives FINGERED BY ANDERSON AND CORRADO, act in conspiracy to SUBTERFUGE ALL Criminal Complaints or Lawsuits that arise against the CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATION from any victims.

Anderson FINGERS, under sworn oath under G-d, in both Federal Court and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, that SENIOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS are “WHITEWASHING” ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT complaints, destroying documents, altering records and committing FELONY OBSTRUCTION after FELONY OBSTRUCTION, in both State and Federal proceedings. Blocking Due Process of their Victims and erasing any complaints against the Members of the Criminal Organization. A “Good Ole-Boy” network of Criminals operating inside government.

The Criminal Operatives with legal degrees, upon entering and exiting public offices, swing through a “Revolving Door” of “Favored Law Firms” as described by Anderson. Big payouts are waiting for them in INSTANT PARTNERSHIPS with the “Favored Law Firms” for their time in public DISSERVICE and for their work Aiding and Abetting the facilitation of the Crimes by INTENTIONALLY FAILING TO REGULATE or PROSECUTE. Many of these Criminal Operatives in fact leave lucrative multi-million dollar legal jobs at Major US Law Firms to enter low paying public service jobs with the intent of derailing complaints or disabling regulations, in order to facilitate the illegal legal schemes and collect their payout later in Partnership deals with the RICO Law Firms the crimes benefit.

Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS demand immediate investigations of ALL those responsible for the disabling and perversion of the Judicial System and Regulatory Oversight Agencies that are designed to protect US Citizens from Crimes committed by Public Officials, Justices, Prosecutors, Law Firms and Attorneys at Law. Anderson’s allegations reveal there is nowhere to turn at the State or Federal level where Whistleblowers or Victims can pursue claims against these “Protected” Government Officials, where Senior Public Officials are not already in place to block the complaints through continued Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons and State & Federal Law. CONFLICTS remain “the glue that binds” the crimes from prosecution in the courts and prosecutorial offices, as Victims and Whistleblower are passed back and forth for years between Agencies that intentionally deny and dismiss complaints without fair and impartial due process of law through the FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS described by Anderson and the other Whistleblowers.

The Criminals, disguised as Public Officials with Law Degrees, are not lazy, lackadaisical, ignorant, or “asleep at the wheel,” they instead appear this way in order to subterfuge and derail prosecutions, lawsuits and regulatory discipline, while holding the door open for their criminal legal brethren and their criminal clientele as they loot the country and world markets. ANDERSON’S ALLEGATIONS EXPLAIN WHY THERE HAVE BEEN NO SUBSTANTIVE PROSECUTIONS, ARRESTS OR TRIALS, OF ANY OF THE PUBLIC OFFICIALS, LAW FIRMS, LAWYERS, JUSTICES AND PROSECUTORS and CORPORATE CRIMINALS WHO WITH SCIENTER, AIDED AND ABETTED THE CRIMES COMMITTED ON WALL STREET/FRAUD STREET, ALL CRIMINALLY FAILING TO UPHOLD THEIR PUBLIC OFFICE DUTIES AND LAW. NO JUSTICE WHATSOEVER, DESPITE ABSOLUTE AND OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF CRIMES.

JUSTICE IS DEAD AND THIS COURT IS A CENTRAL PARTY TO THE COUP D’ÉTAT and OFFICIALS OF THIS COURT have a DIRECT and heavy hand in aiding and abetting the crimes and COVER-UP of this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit and the crimes committed on Wall Street/Fraud Street that have destroyed Main Street and streets throughout the World. What Court could allow all these Crimes to continue under its very nose, allowing violations of Constitutional and Human Rights, covering up ILLEGAL TORTURE CRIMES and ECONOMIC CRIMES, softening the blow for Ponzi Schemers and Wall Street Banksters brought before the court, a blind eye to victims? The Public need look no further than THIS DIRTY COURT, which has jurisdiction over Wall Street/Fraud Street and the Attorneys at Law on Wall Street where the crimes appear to both begin and end. OFFICIALS OF THIS COURT have become a central component of the RICO Criminal Organization’s success in both committing these TREASONOUS and TYRANNOUS crimes and aiding evading prosecution. The Criminal Acts committed by Officials of THIS COURT by intentionally and with scienter attempting to conceal the evidence of crimes exposed by CREDIBLE WITNESSES in VIOLATION OF LAW, acts as further PRIMA FACIE evidence of this Court’s Felony Criminal Activities.

The failure to CALL IN THE GUARDS after learning of the Anderson, Corrado and Hart FELONY WHISTLEBLOWING CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SENIOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS, including many of those handling these Lawsuits in Conflict, Violation of Public Office, Violations of Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law, constitutes further FELONY MISPRISION OF FELONY(IES), OBSTRUCTION and more. Members of THIS COURT, instead of following Law however are instead found VIOLATING LAW by attempting to sweep the FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS they are fully cognizant of, under the rug, intentionally and with scienter ,dismissing the Anderson and Related Case Lawsuits prior to LEGALLY REQUIRED INVESTIGATIONS, acting in a hurried effort to hide the crimes and their culpability in them.

HISTORY OF THE COUP

I am concerned for the security of our great Nation; not so much because of any threat from without, but because of the insidious forces working from within. — General of the United States Army Douglas MacArthur

—–

“Hylan’s most famous words against “the interests” was the following speech, made in 1922, while he was the sitting Mayor of New York City (1917–25)

‘The real menace of our Republic is the invisible government, which like a giant octopus sprawls its slimy legs over our cities, states and nation. To depart from mere generalizations, let me say that at the head of this octopus are the Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests and a small group of powerful banking houses generally referred to as the international bankers. The little coterie of powerful international bankers virtually run the United States government for their own selfish purposes. ‘They practically control both parties, write political platforms, make catspaws of party leaders, use the leading men of private organizations, and resort to every device to place in nomination for high public office only such candidates as will be amenable to the dictates of corrupt big business. ‘These international bankers and Rockefeller-Standard Oil interests control the majority of the newspapers and magazines in this country. They use the columns of these papers to club into submission or drive out of office public officials who refuse to do the bidding of the powerful corrupt cliques which compose the invisible government. It operates under cover of a self-created screen [and] seizes our executive officers, legislative bodies, schools, courts, newspapers and every agency created for the public protection.

This “invisible government”, Hylan and others - William Jennings Bryan, Charles Lindbergh Sr. (R-MN) - argued, exercised its control of the US Government through the Federal Reserve.”

—–

The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. That I do not intend to permit to the extent that it is in my control. And no official of my Administration, whether his rank is high or low, civilian or military, should interpret my words here tonight as an excuse to censor the news, to stifle dissent, to cover up our mistakes or to withhold from the press and the public the facts they deserve to know.” President John F. Kennedy Waldorf-Astoria Hotel on April 27, 1961. “The President and the Press” before the American Newspaper Publishers Association
http://www.thepowerhour.com/news3/jfk_speech_transcript.htm

—–

As eloquently stated in her Dismissal Order [Footnote 34] of this RICO & Antitrust Lawsuit, Shira Scheindlin states,

07 Civ. 11196 (SAS)

I. INTRODUCTION

“This action presents a dramatic story of intrigue, car bombing, conspiracy, video technology, and murder. In short, plaintiffs allege that hundreds of defendants engaged in a massive conspiracy to violate their civil rights and, in the process, contributed to the Enron bankruptcy and the presidency of George W. Bush. In plaintiffs’ words:

Plaintiffs depict a conspiratorial pattern of fraud, deceit, and misrepresentation, that runs so wide and so deep, that it tears at the very fabric, and becomes the litmus test, of what has come to be known as free commerce through inventors’ rights and due process in this country, and in that the circumstances involve inventors’ rights tears at the very fabric of the Democracy protected under the Constitution of the United States.” [Footnote 35]

Defendants characterize the events quite differently:

For many years, pro se Plaintiffs Eliot I. Bernstein and Plaintiff Stephen Lamont have engaged in a defamatory and harassing campaign … alleging an immense global conspiracy … Although largely unintelligible, the [Amended Complaint] purports to describe a fantastic conspiracy among members of the legal profession, judges and government officials and private individuals and businesses to deprive plaintiffs of what they describe as their “holy grail” technologies. While I cannot determine which of these descriptions is more accurate…” [Footnote 36]

—–

[Footnote 34,35 & 36]

[34]Shira Scheindlin Dismissal Order August 08, 2008

[35]RICO & ANTITRUST Amended Complaint

[36] Scheindlin Order Footnote = Memorandum of Law in Support of the Defendants’ Proskauer Motion to Dismiss, at 1.

—–

If Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin cannot determine which account is more accurate, certainly this leaves the question of if she should have dismissed the case prematurely and prior to investigation of Anderson but more importantly prior to determining if the Presidency of George W. Bush was in fact related to the theft of the Iviewit Intellectual Properties and Iviewit’s direct relation to Defendant Enron/Enron Broadband and their attempted theft of the Intellectual Properties. One must then analyze the relevant facts of Plaintiff’s assertion that a TREASONOUS and TYRANNOUS Coup D’état was preempted by the Iviewit Criminals getting caught and the need to block CRIMINAL LEGAL ACTIONS against them. Plaintiff initially thought that the Coup was planned directly as a result of his inventions, the crimes to steal them being uncovered and the need for these MAJOR US LAW FIRMS to then cover them up. What has since been discovered is that the Coupsters were slowly plotting and planning UN-AMERICAN activities for several decades and had made inroads into the three branches of government for years, with great success but not total control of the US Government, Iviewit would provide the spark to initiate the Power Grab in Toto.

The Coup therefore has evolved over time and culminated in the total takeover of the United States Government, starting with the ILLEGAL and TYRANNOUS Bush v. Gore Election Fraud enacted by the Supreme Court Jesters, in the 5-4 Vote by the Supreme Court that USURPED the Vote of the PEOPLE.

The Supreme Court majority’s argument, that a Florida recount would cause Bush “irreparable harm”—that is, loss of the White House—struck many observers as a blatant payoff for the life appointments bestowed by prior Republican presidents. Justice Antonin Scalia [Footnote 37] proved that suspicion correct when he wrote, in approving Bush’s plea for a ban on recounts, that “the issuance of the stay suggests that a majority of the Court, while not deciding the issues presented, believe that the petitioner [Bush] has a substantial probability of success.” Furthermore, the Court’s majority declared that its “logic” in supporting Bush would have no future application to any other case but was strictly “limited to the present circumstances, for the problem of equal protection in election processes generally presents many complexities.” As author Vincent Bugliosi noted, “This point . . . all alone and by itself, clearly and unequivocally shows that the Court knew its decision was not based on the merits or the law, and was solely a decision to appoint George Bush President.” Justice John Stevens III affirmed that view in his dissenting opinion when he wrote, “Although we may never know with complete certainty the identity of the winner of this year’s presidential election, the identity of the loser is perfectly clear. It is the nation’s confidence in [this Court] as an impartial guardian of the rule of law.” Unmentioned in that opinion were the blatant conflicts of interest that should have caused two pro-Bush justices to abstain from hearing the case: A son of Justice Antonin Scalia was employed by the law firm that filed suit on Bush’s behalf [Footnote 38], while the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas worked for the Heritage Foundation, busily vetting future Bush appointees at the time her husband helped appoint Bush to the Oval Office. [Footnote 39]

Supreme Court Justice Breyer states,

The good news, according Breyer, was that despite the court’s irregular action, there were no riots in the streets of America, such as those that are part of the Arab spring we have been hearing so much about. He added: At least 20 percent of you, when I’m saying there was no violence in the streets, you’re thinking, ‘And too bad there wasn’t.’ But I want those of you who are thinking that to turn on your television sets and look at what happens in countries who decide to resolve their most serious problems (with violence).

It’s a valid point. But it goes only so far. The decision led to plenty of violence elsewhere. Before Bush v. Gore is allowed to compost into history, let’s reflect on some of its consequences. [Footnote 40]

Breyer further states in his dissent in Bush v. Gore,

At the same time, as I have said, the Court is not acting to vindicate a fundamental constitutional principle, such as the need to protect a basic human liberty. No other strong reason to act is present. Congressional statutes tend to obviate the need. And, above all, in this highly politicized matter, the appearance of a split decision runs the risk of undermining the public’s confidence in the Court itself. That confidence is a public treasure. It has been built slowly over many years, some of which were marked by a Civil War and the tragedy of segregation. It is a vitally necessary ingredient of any successful effort to protect basic liberty and, indeed, the rule of law itself. We run no risk of returning to the days when a President (responding to this Court’s efforts to protect the Cherokee Indians) might have said, “John Marshall has made his decision; now let him enforce it!” Loth, Chief Justice John Marshall and The Growth of the American Republic 365 (1948). But we do risk a self-inflicted wound – a wound that may harm not just the Court, but the Nation.

I fear that in order to bring this agonizingly long election process to a definitive conclusion, we have not adequately attended to that necessary “check upon our own exercise of power,” “our own sense of self-restraint.” United States v. Butler, 297 U.S. 1, 79 (1936) (Stone, J., dissenting). Justice Brandeis once said of the Court, “The most important thing we do is not doing.” Bickel, supra, at 71. What it does today, the Court should have left undone. I would repair the damage done as best we now can, by permitting the Florida recount to continue under uniform standards. [Footnote 41]

—–

[Footnote 37,38,39 & 40]

[37] Wikipedia Entry on Foley & Lardner @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foley_%26_Lardner

Note here that InJustice Antonin Scalia worked at Defendant Foley & Lardner Law Firm. Also note here that Falsely Anointed President Barack Hussein Obama II is also a former Alumni of the Foley & Lardner Law Firm, a mainly Republican Law Firm, who worked under Defendant Michael Grebe, former CEO of Foley & Lardner Law Firm and also former Republican National Committee Chief Counsel during the Bush Election Fraud and Treason. Grebe is rumored to be the largest MoneyBag for both the Bush and Obama Campaigns???

“Notable current and former employees Barack Obama, President of the United States, summer associate in the Chicago office of Hopkins & Sutter, which was acquired by Foley & Lardner in 2001 Antonin Scalia, United States Supreme Court Justice, was a summer associate in the Milwaukee office”

[38] “THE STOLEN ELECTION OF 2000”

http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/jphuck/Book10Ch.3.html

Second, two sons of Justice Scalia worked for law firms involved with Bush’s legal team. One son, Eugene Scalia, was a partner in the Washington office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. Another partner, Theodore Olson, argued Bush’s case before the Supreme Court. The young Scalia served as Special Assistant to Attorney General of the United States William Barr. The other son, John Scalia, accepted a position with the Miami-based firm [Defendant in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit] Greenberg Traurig on November 7. The next day, Barry Richard, a partner in the firm, said he was called about representing Bush in Florida.

[39] “THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CONSPIRACIES AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES” by Michael Newton, Facts On File, Inc., 2006

http://www.scribd.com/doc/25045356/The-Encyclopedia-of-Conspiracies-and-Conspiracy-Theories

[40] “The Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore still resonates” Editorial SentinelSource.com, Posted: Tuesday, May 31, 2011

http://www.sentinelsource.com/opinion/editorial/the-supreme-court-decision-in-bush-v-gore-still-resonates/article_62dd2598-e32a-5554-a884-7e8f94c71abb.html

[41]

Breyer, J., dissenting

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

——————————————————————————–

No. 00—949

——————————————————————————–

GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., PETITIONERS v.

ALBERT GORE, Jr., et al.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

[December 12, 2000]

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZD3.html

—–

The Supreme Court Members that partook in that TREASONOUS ELECTION FRAUD are the ROOTS of the Coupsters total control of Government from that moment forward. Once the Executive Branch and SUPREME COURT were ILLEGALLY secured in a CONSPIRATORIAL TREASON and a FALSE PRESIDENT BUSH ANOINTED by the SUPREME COURT CRIMINALS, the remaining branches of Government, (Legislative & Judicial) quickly crumbled along with the once Free Press. With the Politicization/Witch-hunt of the Justice Department by Defendant Former US Attorney General Alberto Gonzales who resigned in humiliation, Justice in America Died and has been dead ever since. In filing this RICO Lawsuit, as with all LEGAL CONSPIRACIES, where two or more conspire to commit crime, not all relevant facts and players were, or are, fully known and this remains true as new evidence surfaces daily regarding the tentacles and history of the TRAITORS and their TREASONOUS CRIMES defined herein.

Plaintiff, in researching the Legal Conspiracy to steal Plaintiff’s inventions [Footnote 42], has unearthed a more massive Global Power Grab by these same Coupsters who have since the FALSE PRESIDENT BUSH’S ANOINTMENT and TOTAL TAKEOVER OF THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT have gone on a MASSIVE CRIME SPREE as already described herein, leading to what is being termed WORLD III. It appears this time that the United States is the host nation to the Nazis, coupled with a TYRANNOUS GROUP OF UN-PATRIOTIC, UN-AMERICAN, NAZI FRY LOVING, FASCIST, ELITIST PIG, CRIMINAL, NEW WORLD DISORDER, SELLOUTS, OF OUR COUNTRY AND CONSTITUTION. Let us then begin exposing the Coup in stages, from their NAZI PASTS and link them up with the Players currently involved in today’s TREASON, the ECONOMIC WARFARE and this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, with special focus on the Bush Family Secrets that have come to light recently. Keep in mind that the following items are Not Conspiracy Theories but are Legal Conspiracies steeped in FACTUAL EVIDENCE and TRIABLE as TREASON with a DEATH PENALTY SENTENCE FOR MANY OF THE CRIMES if found guilty.

—–

[Footnote 42]

[42] The Iviewit technologies have been valued in the TRILLIONS of dollars, valued by leading engineers as “PRICELESS” and the “HOLY GRAIL” inventions of the digital imaging and video worlds, affecting virtually every form of digital communication. In fact, almost 99.99% of users of digital imaging and video products use the Iviewit Technologies in some form or other, .01% is most likely statistical aberration. Therefore, the Iviewit RICO exposes one of the largest crimes against an individual in World History, certainly the largest against any US Citizen/Inventor. Where again we find Attorneys at Law, trusted Patent and Corporate Counsel, charged with the crime of theft of their RETAINED CLIENT’S Intellectual Property Rights and Royalties. As the Amended Complaint alleges, the royalties owed the Inventors have been ILLEGALLY CONVERTED by their former Intellectual Property and Corporate Counsel for their own gains.

One of the Intellectual Property Attorneys accused, Defendant Raymond Anthony Joao of Defendants Proskauer Rose/Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel put 90+ patents in his very own name. Joao acted as lackey for the main Iviewit Retained Attorney at Law, Patent Hack, Defendant Kenneth Rubenstein of Defendant Proskauer Rose/Defendant Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel and the same Rubenstein who is the sole (soulless) patent Reviewer for DEFENDANT MPEGLA, LLC. MPEGLA one of the largest infringers and chief conspirators in the Iviewit Intellectual Properties theft, where Rubenstein represented Iviewit and then stole the Patent Pending/Suspending IP off to his Patent Pools at MPEGLA, LLC, then through a pattern of Antitrust and Racketeering Activity precluded the Inventors of their rights. We find that Joao after being accused by Iviewit Management of Falsifying Patent Oaths went to work with the recently imprisoned Marc S. Dreier at the law firm of Dreier & Baritz, information regarding how the Dreier affair is directly related to Iviewit has already been submitted to this court.

The Attorneys at Law then used the courts to facilitate their crime by disabling the inventors’ Intellectual Property rights to their inventions through Conflict after Conflict in the Courts and Prosecutorial Offices to block Plaintiff/Inventor’s legal rights, all as explained in detail in the Iviewit Amended Complaint and RICO Statement. Finally, in order to LAUNDER the ILL GOTTEN ROYALTIES over the past DECADE, the lawyers have created further frauds, allegedly including the Ponzis aka Criminal RICO Money Laundering Operations such as, Madoff, Dreier, Stanford and others. Evidence has been presented to this Court and the US District Court regarding the relation of these Ponzis to the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST, showing their direct ties to Defendants in this Lawsuit, the Ponzis used as vehicles to wash hundreds of billions of converted stolen royalties, while making it appear to be from Ponzi losses or other financial fraud schemes, again more COMPLEX ILLEGAL LEGAL CRIMES USING THE COURTS TO AID & ABET the Crimes, all again, only committable with a LEGAL DEGREE MISUSED.

—–

bush-scherf-nazi

According to Otto Skorzeny, pictured is the Scherff family and a few friends (circa 1938). Holding “Mother” Scherff’s hand at left is Martin Bormann. In front is Reinhardt Gehlen. In back is Joseph Mengele and to his right is Skorzeny as a young man. At center right (in the German navy uniform) is George H. Scherff, Jr. and his father George H. Scherff, Sr. Bormann became Hitler’s second in command. Reinhardt Gehlen was a chief SS officer and assassin who was smuggled out of Germany under Operation Paperclip. Skorzeny was Hitler’s bodyguard and SS spy/assassin who came to the U.S. after the war under Project Paperclip. Skorzeny and GHW Bush were instrumental in merging Nazi (SS) intelligence with the OSI to form the CIA with “Wild Bill” Donovan and Allen Dulles. These guys were also part of CIA mind control experiments such as MK-ULTRA. SS officer and physician Joseph Mengele, the notoriously sadistic “Angel of Death” of Auschwitz, escaped Germany to South America after the war. George H. Scherff, Jr., became the 41st President of the United States as GHW Bush and George H. Scherff, Sr., was Nicola Tesla’s “trusted assistant.”

1. Was our 41st President, George H.W. Bush actually a Nazi from Germany named George Scherff, as depicted here in the photograph [Footnote 43] released by Hitler’s bodyguard, which shows George H.W. Bush/Scherff with leading Nazi’s Josef Mengele and Martin Bormann?

—–

[Footnote 43]

[43] “Deathbed confessions, photos support claims that George H. Scherf(f), Jr., was the 41st U.S. president” Idaho Observer April 2007

http://proliberty.com/observer/20070405.htm

—–

2.

3. The Skull and Bones – Bush Family Ties to a Nazi Fraternity imported to the Yale Campus and subsequently leading to other similar cults. Prescott Bush was a member as were both his sons. Masturbatory rituals steeped in Fascist & Nazi Un-American Cult activities. [Footnote 44]

—–

[Footnote 44]

[44] “Prescott Bush, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prescott_Bush

—–

4. The Business Plot [Footnote 45] and The House Committee on Un-American Activities (HCUA) or House Un-American Activities Committee (HUAC) [Footnote 46]

—–

[Footnote 45 & 46]

[45] “THE PLOT TO SEIZE THE WHITE HOUSE” by Jules Archer, HAWTHORN BOOKS, INC. PUBLISHERS / New York, 1973

http://www.wanttoknow.info/plottoseizethewhitehouse

[46] Wikipedia on Un-American Activities Committee

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Un-American_Activities_Committee

—–

From a 1950’s speech, by Robert Welch,

A part of that plan, of course, is to induce the gradual surrender of American sovereignty [TREASON] piece-by-piece and step-by-step to various international organizations of which the United Nations is the outstanding but far from the only example….Here are the aims for the United States:

1) Greatly expanded government spending for every conceivable means for getting rid of ever larger sums of American money as wastefully as possible;

2) Higher and then much higher taxes;

3) An increasingly unbalanced budget despite the higher taxes;

4) Wild inflation of our currency;

5) Government controls of prices, wages and materials supposedly to combat inflation;

6) Greatly increased socialistic controls over every operation of our economy and every activity of our daily lives. This is to be accompanied naturally and automatically by a correspondingly huge increase in the size of our bureaucracy, and in both the costs and reach of our domestic government;

7) Far more centralization of power in Washington and the practical elimination of our State lines. There is a many faceted drive at work to have our State lines eventually mean no more within the nation than our county lines do now within the States;

8) A steady advance of federal aid to and control over our educational system leading to complete federalization of our public education;

9) A constant hammering into the American consciousness of the horror of modern warfare…the absolute necessity of peace, peace always, on communist terms of course; and

10) The consequent willingness of the American people to allow the steps of appeasement by our government which amount to a piece meal surrender of the rest of the free world and of the United States itself. [Footnote 47]

—–

[Footnote 47]

[47] “Right Before Our Eyes! There Should Be No Doubt After You Watch This Shocking Video! Mind blowing speech by Robert Welch in 1958 predicting Insiders plans to destroy America” Posted Knowing on April 27, 2011

http://www.foreclosurehamlet.org/profiles/blogs/right-before-our-eyes-there

—–

From a speech by Libertarian Candidate Stan Jones, in a Senatorial Campaign speech,

Stan Jones: I wish to thank the sponsors for inviting me; I don’t often get invited. This was an important debate. I had planned another closing message, but I feel compelled to say what I’m about to say.

Now, I risk sounding like a conspiracy theorist, but it’s no longer a theory. What I’m about to say is fact.

The secret organizations of the world power elite are no longer secret. They have planned and are now leading us into a one world communist government…

The combining of national governments started with the European Union. That union started with trade agreements, then a common currency- the euro….

Now it’s North America’s turn. Building on the North American Free Trade Agreement, the NAFTA section of the commerce department is busy drafting laws and regulations for a North American Union– a union of Canada, America and Mexico. The president has attended secret meetings and signed at least two agreements under the Security and Prosperity Partnership program…

Information leaked out about the meetings and now it is all out in the open. No treaty has been signed, so Congress has not become involved. However, money from our treasury is now being spent for this effort. We will have a new currency– the Amero– and a new constitution modeled on the Soviet Union’s constitution.

Our rights will not be inalienable, but will be granted by government who can also take them away. One sign that this is our future is the plans for the superhighways from southern Mexico through America and into Canada. These plans are not secret any longer.

Huge amounts of property will be taken in the name of “free trade”, “peace” and “security”…

You will not be able to move about freely. This is terrorism of the worst kind– brought on you by our own government. The strongest, freest nation in the history of mankind will be averaged into world communism. Is that what you want? Are we, the people, still in control of this nation? We must begin to act like we are!

—–

[Footnote 48]

[48] “Libertarian candidate Stan Jones points out American Union, Plans for Chips, Trackers and Control by Gov’t”

Jones Report | October 10, 2006

Stan Jones is running for Senate in Montana as a Libertarian. He lays out the extent to which Clinton, through NAFTA, and George W. Bush, through the expansion of NAFTA and the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), have sold out our country to world governance.

The candidate expressed being compelled to change in his planned remarks to point out the secret plan to lead us into One World Government through a North American Union with a common currency (the Amero), as well as the related plan to build a superhighway throughout the continent. This is linked with a compulsory National ID tracked by a radio-frequency chip.

http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/111006_stan_jones.html

and

“Truth! Stan Jones’ Speech About New World Order & North American Union”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9-FuCyl588

and

www.iviewit.tv/senatecultbill.htm

and

Iviewit Letter “Re: Senate Cult Bill for Your Consideration” to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton addressing Treasonous Cults in the US Government and Proposed Legislation to Stop it. Iviewit has yet to receive a response from Hillary Clinton, who is a cult member in several of the Un-American Cults complained about, ie Bilderbergs, CFR and more. October 17, 2007 -

http://iviewit.tv/bodyold20080402.htm

and

“Want your mind BLOWN? Watch this video! OBAMA ANSWERS to the VATICAN!” Uploaded by TruthTVMichigan on Apr 14, 2011, YOUTUBE (truly ELIOTTUBE)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rd1Twnoq-Dw (Grab some Popcorn and the kids & educate yourself)

—–

5. Law Firms & Bush Family Ties to Fascism & Nazis, charges of Treason & Trading with the Enemy (the Nazis) against Prescott Bush and Seizure of Properties under Trading with the Enemy Act. [Footnotes 49,50 & 51]

“Some Americans were just bigots and made their connections to Germany through Allen Dulles’s firm of Sullivan and Cromwell because they supported Fascism. The Dulles brothers, who were in it for profit more than ideology, arranged American investments in Nazi Germany in the 1930s to ensure that their clients did well out of the German economic recovery. . . . “Once the government had its hands on Bush’s books, the whole story of the intricate web of Nazi front corporations began to unravel. A few days later two of Union Banking’s subsidiaries — the Holland American Trading Corporation and the Seamless Steel Equipment Corporation — also were seized. Then the government went after the Harriman Fifteen Holding Company, which Bush shared with his father- in-law, Bert Walker, the Hamburg-Amerika Line, and the Silesian- American Corporation. The U.S. government found that huge sections of Prescott Bush’s empire had been operated on behalf of Nazi Germany and had greatly assisted the German war effort.” (1)

Well, there goes my education and texts, where were the texts on the Bush Family Fascist Nazi UnAmerican Trading with the Enemy Hitler connections or Kennedy Assassination connections with the Bush Criminal Cartel Syndicate? All were buried, history for Plaintiff rewritten with brute force and replaced with bullshit, history as my generation was taught, a complete lie, I want a refund from my Colleges or I will sue when law and order returns. There goes the history that America was not involved in World War II prior to Pearl Harbor. Instead, we find a group of AMERICANS, THAT REALLY ARE UN-AMERICAN, FASCISTS, NAZI FRY LOVERS, TRADERS WITH THE ENEMY HITLER, FUNDERS OF THE ENEMY HITLER, and WHO KILLED OUR SOLDIERS. They are LAPEL PIN PATRIOTS, SELLOUTS OF THE CONSTITUTION, TREASONOUS, TRAITORS whose ASSETS were SEIZED for directly FUNDING HITLER with CASH and SUPPLIES and other HORRORS. Horrors including the studies done by the horripilating Josef Rudolf Mengele, also known as the Angel of Death, Mengele, pre-Hitler, funded by the Rockefellers and Carnegies and others, prior to Hitler’s Coup D’Etat on the Good People and Nation of Germany.

Mr. Black is the author of IBM and the Holocaust and the just released War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America’s Campaign to Create a Master Race, from which the following article is drawn.

Hitler and his henchmen victimized an entire continent and exterminated millions in his quest for a co-called “Master Race.”

But the concept of a white, blond-haired, blue-eyed master Nordic race didn’t originate with Hitler. The idea was created in the United States, and cultivated in California, decades before Hitler came to power. California eugenicists played an important, although little known, role in the American eugenics movement’s campaign for ethnic cleansing. [Footnote 52]

So was it a group of Fascist Un-American’s that J Edgar Hoover uncovered that truly financed Hitler’s rise and the War. A group of Sellout Un-American’s some, including Prescott Bush who actually were tried and convicted of alliances with the Nazis, alliances that funded the Nazi War effort at the expense and death of our PATRIOTIC SOLDIERS. These individuals included a larger group of United States Fascist Businessman who evaded trial in the United States, a big mistake, which ultimately led to them being able to reform in secret cults and slowly Coup the United States and certain foreign nations until we have Nazi America of today? What we do know is there is a certain set of families for several generations in the United States who have operated against the PEOPLE, typically within secretive and subversive cults. These Traitorous families from WWII appear to have been operating since then in secret to subvert our nation, including in the halls of our Ivy League campuses, yet recently their cults and secrets have been exposed. What we find from the exposure is that behind today’s ECONOMIC CRIMES and WAR CRIMES, are these very same bloodlines from the Business Plot I that should have been exterminated for Treason then. Yet there is a major difference this time around, as now they are CAUGHT red-handed in a plethora of WAR and ECONOMIC CRIMES, with absolute evidence against them of their crimes. Now that the Genie is out of the bottle and their dirty secrets and crimes now exposed, our leaders look like the Emperor in “The Emperor’s New Clothes”, delusional of the will of the PEOPLE, the 99%, who are demanding Justice and TRIALS for TREASON, War Crimes and Economic Terrorism, a hanging they will go, thus the reason they live in Delusions of Grandeur.

—–

[Footnotes 49, 50, 51 & 52]

[49] “Documents: Bush’s Grandfather Directed Bank Tied to Man Who Funded Hitler - President Bush’s grandfather was a director of a bank seized by the federal government because of its ties to a German industrialist who helped bankroll Adolf Hitler’s rise to power, government documents show.” Friday, October 17, 2003

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,100474,00.html

[50] www.tenc.net [Emperor's Clothes] “Nazis in the Attic” Part 6 By Randy Davis

http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/randy/swas5.htm

[51]

[52] “The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics” By Edwin Black

http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html

—–

6. The Business Plot and Un-American Activity Coupsters Relevant to this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit

i. Joseph Proskauer [Footnote 53]

—–

[Footnote 53]

[53] “The Nazi Hydra in America: Suppressed History of a Century” By Glen Yeadon, John Hawkins

Page 131

—–

ii. JP Morgan

iii. Chase Bank

iv. Deutsche Bank / Bankers Trust

v.

7. The Assassination of President John F. Kennedy – New Bush Family Ties

8. The Attempted Assassination of Ronald Reagan – Bush Family Ties

9. The S&L Crimes – Bush Associations [Footnote 54]

—–

[Footnote 54]

[54]“The Bush family and the S&L Scandal”, rationalrevolution.net

http://rationalrevolution.net/war/bush_family_and_the_s.htm and http://rationalrevolution.net/war/index.htm

—–

10. The Business Plot II – The New World DisOrder [Footnote 55], which can also be called a New World TREASON and under Our Constitution again triable as such.

Today’s crimes by these families and efforts to again overthrow our government can be referred to as The Business Plot II, which began with the Treasonous Anointment of the George W. Bush Administration through ELECTION FRAUD, RIGGED by the US Supreme Court acting outside the Constitution, in fact, violating it and usurping the PEOPLES VOTE in a 5-4 Court Anointment. In this act, the country and the will of the PEOPLE were lost.

—–

[Footnote 55]

[55] “Welcome To The New World Order (FULL LENGTH FILM)”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gty42YkcSeQ&feature=related

and

“The CIA revealed as the Gestapo of the Vatican’s Fourth Reich.” By Paul W. Kincaid, PRESS Core.ca.

http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=4871

and

THRIVE – The Movie, by Foster and Kimberly Gamble, Clear Compass Media

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI2LGmZ_EP4

http://thrivemovement.com

—–

This book is about the culpability of those justices who hijacked Election 2000 by distorting the law, violating their own expressed principles, and using their own robes to bring about a partisan result. I accuse them of failing what I call the shoe-on-the-other-foot test: I believe that they would not have stopped a hand recount if George W. Bush had been seeking it. This is an extremely serious charge, because deciding a case on the basis of the identity of the litigants is a fundamental violation of the judicial oath, to “administer justice without respect to persons”…In this book, I marshal the evidence in support of this charge…

and

Vincent Bugliosi, the generally moderate former prosecutor known for securing the conviction of the Charles Manson gang, used even stronger language, accusing the Supreme Court’s ‘brazen, shameless majority’ of being a knowing surrogate for the Republican Party instead of being an impartial arbiter of the law.’ He characterized these justices as ‘criminals in the truest sense of the word’ and described their opinion as ‘fraudulent.’ [Thus a fraudulent President and successors and all appointees.] My Harvard Law School colleague Randall Kennedy called the Supreme Court’s intervention ‘a scandal’ and its decision outrageous. He accused the Court of acting ‘in bad faith and with partisan prejudice’ and concluded that the high court is ‘unworthy of deference.’ Scott Turow said the decision was ‘the most overtly politicized action by a court that I have seen in 22 years of practicing law’ and labeled it ‘an act of judicial lawlessness.’ Professor Bruce Ackerman of Yale Law School accuse the majority of ‘vulgar partisanship.’” [Dershwoitz pg 175]” [Footnote 56]

—–

[Footnote 56]

[56] “Supreme Injustice, how the High Court Hijacked Election 2000” by Alan Dershowitz – Oxford University Press 2001.

http://books.google.com/books?id=eVqdJks5Op0C&lpg=PP1&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false

—–

The Election Fraud was aided and abetted by Bush’s First Cousin at Fox News, John Prescott Ellis,

The individual responsible for recommending that Fox call Florida for Bush was John Ellis, who led the network’s decision desk. Ellis was not a disinterested party in the presidential election, but the first cousin of the Republican candidate and his brother, Florida Governor Jeb Bush. Details emerging since Election Day concerning Ellis’s role in the network’s decision to call Florida for Bush raise serious questions as to whether his actions and Fox News’s complicity constituted not only a violation of the democratic rights of the electorate, but a criminal conspiracy. [Footnote 57 & 58]

—–

[Footnote 57 & 58]

[57] “Elements of a conspiracy - How Bush’s man at Fox News worked to shape the outcome of the US election” By Kate Randall 17 November 2000

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/nov2000/fox-n17.shtml and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Prescott_Ellis

[58] “REINING IN THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY - Lessons and Recommendations Relating to the Presidency of George W. Bush” by United States House of Representatives ~ House Committee on the Judiciary Majority Staff Report to Chairman John Conyers, Jr., January 13, 2009

http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/printers/110th/IPres090113.pdf

and

“Articles of Impeachment – President George W. Bush - H. Res. 1258, 110th Cong. (2008). Congressmen Dennis Kucinich and Robert Wexler June 10, 2008

http://chun.afterdowningstreet.org/amomentoftruth.pdf

and

“Dennis Kucinich Documents Grounds for Impeachment of Bush & Cheney”

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6265058101839429571# - Part 1

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1857978401494382897# - Part 2

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-785946969577220461# - Part 3

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=442901163793389423# - Part 4

Dennis Kucinich on War Crimes in 2011 ILLEGAL WAR OF AGGRESSION LIBYA

“Kucinich, Interview, Obama Libya War Violates Constitution and UN Resolution, Libya”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bji4XY6GtzA

—–

The Presidency of George W. Bush was illegally decided through ELECTION RIGGING constituting TREASON against the PEOPLE of the UNITED STATES. If proven TRUE when tried in a fair and impartial court, all ANOINTMENTS & APPOINTMENTS in Government from that point forward, from the SUPREME COURT’S TREASONOUS ELECTION FRAUD would be invalidated and all Court Jesters, Prosecutors, Regulators, etc. who were ILLEGALLY anointed by Bush and now Falsely Elected President Barrack Hussein Obama II would be invalidated instantly. I wonder how many Bush Anointed Justices in this Court are handling this Lawsuit, despite knowing the claims of Plaintiff against Bush as outlined in Scheindlin’s August 08, 2008 Dismissal. Obama is merely another Coupster with ties to the Bush/Cheney clan of Criminals, as quoted in the Washington Post,

Obama’s Eight Degrees of Dick Cheney - Vice President Cheney is related to Sen. Barack Obama

At least that was the stunning announcement made yesterday by Lynne Cheney, who said that the very white vice president from Wyoming is in fact the eighth cousin of Obama, the Senate’s only African American [more correctly 50% African American & 50% Caucasian] member. She said she discovered the link, traced back to a Huguenot who figured prominently in Maryland history, while researching her latest book.

But his campaign made light of the tie, without confirming it. “Obviously, Dick Cheney is the black sheep of the family,” Obama spokesman Bill Burton said. [Footnote 59 & 60]

—–

[Footnote 59 & 60]

[59] “Obama’s Eight Degrees of Dick Cheney - Vice President Cheney is related to Sen. Barack Obama.” By Anne E. Kornblut, The Washington Post Company, October 16, 2007

[60] “THIS JUST IN . . .Obama and Cheney, Making Connections” by Anne E. Kornblut - The Washington Post, Wednesday, October 17, 2007

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602362.html

—–

After the Bush v. Gore ELECTION FRAUD, upon leaving the Supreme Court, Sandra Day O’Connor then suddenly quit the bench for the unheard of reason of taking care of a spouse, normally they are removed after death. O’Connor’s consenting vote in Bush v. Gore stands as part of the TREASON, yet at her first public speech off the bench at Georgetown University she warned of Corruption perverting the Judicial branch and courts. From the Houston Chronicle,

Such judicial bullying, O’Connor pointed out, is how dictators thrive in former Communist and Third World countries. She reportedly added, “It takes a lot of degeneration before a country falls into dictatorship, but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings.

[Footnote 61]

—–

[Footnote 61]

[61] “Judicious temperament: Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor speaks up against political attacks on courts.” Houston Chronicle, Published Friday, March 17, 2006

http://www.chron.com/opinion/editorials/article/Judicious-temperament-Retired-Supreme-Court-1525680.php

—–

Understanding the Coup D’état in our country is the key to understanding why Plaintiffs have not been able to enjoy the royalties from their world changing inventions and why others, their formerly trusted lawyers, are found lavishing themselves in the stolen funds free of prosecution. Plaintiffs appear to have no legal rights to pursue their property rights in the courts or prosecutorial systems, wholly overtaken by the Coupsters. For 10 years Plaintiffs have provided more than ample evidence of the theft of the properties to authorities, have caught numerous leading PUBLIC OFFICIALS breaking the law, have provided that information and evidence to the proper authorities, including this Court and yet NOTHING is done and Plaintiff has not had a single day in court.

Plaintiff reminds the Members of THIS COURT OF INJUSTICE that There is NO IMMUNITY for CRIMINAL ACTS COMMITTED BY JUSTICES OR MEMBERS OF THE COURTS or any person or entity. NO ONE IS ABOVE THE LAW, despite your CONTINUED efforts to shield your FELONY criminal acts using RIDICULOUS immunity claims or trying to rewrite laws, including jus cogens, to fit your crimes, yet as the world looks on awake to your treasons, justice awaits you.

II. IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL JUSTICES AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE UNITED STATES SECOND CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS ( THIS COURT ) WHOM HAVE CURRENTLY ACTED IN THIS LAWSUIT IN ANYWAY WHATSOEVER, FOR THEIR PART IN AIDING AND ABETTING FRAUD ON THE COURT, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS, HIGH CRIMES AND MISDEMEANORS AND MORE

Continued Criminal Felony Allegations against Members of this Court

Plaintiff thanks the Justice and other Members of this Court who have FINGERPRINTED themselves in this Lawsuit again, for further CRIMINAL PROSECUTION, acting ILLEGALLY to dismiss this Lawsuit through CONTINUED CRIMINAL ACTIVITIES in VIOLATION of Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons and State & Federal Law. These Court Officials who have participated in the crimes cited already herein and in multiple prior court documents, include but are not limited to, the less than honorable Judges, Ralph K. Winter, Jr. Esq., Debra Ann Livingston, Esq., Peter W. Hall, Esq., and Richard C. Wesley, Esq. Additional Members of the Court who have already illegally acted in these matters, include but are not limited to, Defendant/Witness Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of this Court (handling this RICO Lawsuit and Related Lawsuits where she is also BOTH a DEFENDANT AND WITNESS in this lawsuit and Anderson’s lawsuit), Joy Fallek (Administrative Attorney), Catherine J. Minuse (Supervisory Staff Attorrney), Atasha Joseph (Deputy Clerk), Deborah Holmes (Deputy Clerk), Judy Pisnanont (Motions Staff Attorney), and Franklin Perez, (Title Not Known).

Each of the Court Officials named herein can again take this Motion as Official Notice that each of YOU will be added to the list of Defendants in any Iviewit/Eliot Bernstein Amended Complaint of this RICO, all future Lawsuits filed, including but not limited to, patent, trademark and copyright legal actions, and, all ONGOING and FUTURE CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS. Criminal charges already filed against several Justices and Officials of this Court and it will be shown that those Complaints filed with the New York Attorney General’s Office have not even been investigated at this time. No investigation by DEFENDANT and OPPOSING COUNSEL in this Lawsuit, the New York Attorney General Eric T. Scheinderman’s Office, DUE TO THE SHOCKING, ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC SCHEINDERMAN’S OFFICE Admitted and Acknowledged CONFLICTS with the CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS filed with his offices and this RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT [Footnote 62]. These ADMITTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED conflicts forcing the ATTORNEY GENERAL to declare further that due to the ONGOING CONFLICTS OF INTEREST with both the CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS and this LAWSUIT, that their office now NEEDS INDEPENDENT COUNSEL to represent themselves. Additionally, UPON REHEARING THESE MATTERS FROM THE START FREE OF PAST CONFLICTS, the other STATE DEFENDANTS THEREFORE ALL NEED INDEPENDENT COUNSEL NOW TO REPRESENT THEMSELVES in these or ANY IVIEWIT/Eliot Bernstein related matters, as the Attorney General is CONFLICTED OUT and can no longer represent ANY of them.

—–

[Footnote 62]

[62] ADMISSION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST by the NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL in handling CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST ANDREW CUOMO and STEVEN M. COHEN et al. / Phone Call on April 14, 2011 with James Rogers on behalf of Harlan Levy referred by Steven Michael Cohen, Chief of Staff to Governor Andrew Cuomo, regarding FILED Criminal Complaints against the New York Attorney General’s Office, Former Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Steven Michael Cohen, Secretary to Governor Andrew Cuomo and Monica Connell of the New York State Office of the Attorney General et al.” FIled may 20, 2011

incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

and

iviewit calls to ny governor Andrew Cuomo, Emily Cole, Stephen M Cohen, re: Criminal ComplaintS. NY Attorney General eric Schneiderman ADMISSION OF CONFLICTS and need for ny ag to seek independent counsel in all iviewit matters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pwFlEIp6E incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

and

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s “Right Hand Man” Steven M. Cohen Flees Sinking Ship Amidst Iviewit’s Rico & Antitrust Lawsuit, AG Eric Schneiderman Office Admits Conflict of Interest with Iviewit, September 24, 2011. Cohen Returns to Private Sector in wake of Iviewit Criminal Complaints against Cuomo and himself.

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-new-york-governor-andrew-cuomo-s-right-hand-man-steven-m-cohen-flees-sinking-ship-amidst-iviewit-s-rico-antitrust-lawsuit-ag-eric-schneiderman-o-1316880094.html incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

and

June 13, 2009 Letter to NYAG Chief of Staff Steven Cohen Regarding Conflict of Interest

—–

THE FILED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST MEMBERS OF THIS COURT THEREFORE REMAIN PENDING AND AWAIT AN INDEPENDENT NON-CONFLICTED PROSECUTOR TO INVESTIGATE THEM. Plaintiff awaits responses from the AG and others who were notified, with how and who will handle these criminal complaints and these criminal complaints cause CONTINUED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST IN YOUR HANDLING THESE MATTERS until they are properly investigated. The Attorney General obviously has derailed investigations through Conflicts of Interest that OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and DENY DUE PROCESS and this Court has benefited from such VIOLATIONS OF LAW AND ETHIC RULES and therefore ALL PRIOR MEMBERS of this COURT must DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES IMMEDIATELY and the NEW JUSTICES and MEMBERS must REPORT the PRIOR MEMBERS for investigations as legally obligated.

If you are a named Member of this Court named above or whom have handled any of this Lawsuit, again, you are legally obligated to report these liabilities from this lawsuit and all criminal and ethics complaints to all Personal & Professional Liability Carriers, State Auditors, Bond Holders and any other party you are obligated to REPORT LIABILITIES too. ADDITIONALLY NOTICE EACH LIABLE PARTY that OFFICIAL NOTICE has been given and docketed in the Court Record herein of your liabilities and the allegations against you.

Member of this Court, Franklin Perez, deserves special attention in these matters, as he appears an Untitled and Allegedly Illegal signor on ILLEGAL AND FRAUDULENT Orders [Footnote 63] tendered in this Lawsuit, including the FRAUDULENT & ILLEGAL DISMISSAL of this Lawsuit by this Court, which he signed. On information and belief, Mr. Perez was a NON-ATTORNEY Operations Analyst (EXHIBIT 2), at the time he signed an alleged FRAUDULENT ORDER in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. Further, on information and belief, the ILLEGAL ORDER issued by Perez, was issued on a date when this Lawsuit was neither on the docket for that date and none of the signing Justices were in court. All arguments and assertions in Exhibit 2 that are applicable to this Lawsuit, regarding Mr. Perez’s illegal actions signing FALSIFIED AND FRAUDULENT DISMISSAL ORDERS, are hereby incorporated in entirety by reference herein.

—–

[Footnote 63]

[63] Insert Link to Order Dated January 05, 2010.

—–

Additional PRIMA FACIE EVIDENCE of this Court’s Members illegal activities exists relating to Members of THIS COURT failing to act according to well-established MISPRISION OF FELONY laws. Once Members of this Court became aware of the CREDIBLE CLAIMS OF FELONY CRIMES, by CREDIBLE WITNESSES, including but not limited to, ANDERSON, CORRADO, HART and others, including allegations of, AIDING & ABETTING a Criminal RICO Organization Operating inside the Halls of State and Federal Offices, Obstruction of Justice, Threats on Federal Witnesses and more, each Member of the Court with such knowledge then had legal obligation to report the matters for immediate investigations to all proper authorities. Based on Anderson’s allegations these authorities would include but are not limited to, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice, the United States Attorney General, the Inspector General for the New York Attorney General Office, the Inspector General for the District Attorney Office and State and Federal Law Enforcement Officials. Instead, the Cover-Up by MEMBERS OF THIS COURT of the Felony Criminal Acts exposed by Anderson et al. and levied against Senior Ranking Public Officials, becomes criminal in the failure of THIS COURT to,

1. REPORT THE ALLEGATIONS & DEMAND IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATIONS,

2. IMMEDIATELY REMOVE ALL THOSE IDENTIFIED ACTING IN CONFLICT OF INTEREST,

3. CEASE FRAUD UPON THE COURT BY MEMBERS OF THE COURT AND ATTORNEYS AT LAW IN THESE MATTERS,

4. CEASE ONGOING OBSTRUCTIONS, and,

5. IMMEDIATELY DISQUALIFY ALL JUSTICES and COURT OFFICERS WHO HAVE ACTED UNLAWFULLY THUS FAR IN THESE LAWSUITS, as required by Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons and State & Federal Law,

This Court’s INTENTIONAL failure to act according to well-established law constitutes continued Fraud on the Court and Felony Obstruction by the JUSTICES and other Members of this COURT on behalf of the Criminal RICO Organization as defined in the Amended Complaint. Obstruction committed through ongoing combined VIOLATIONS of Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State, Federal and & International Law, by all those adjudicating this Lawsuit and ALL those participating in the defense and prosecution of the Defendants in these matters to date.

The ILLEGAL and OBSTRUCTIONARY ruling to DISMISS this Lawsuit, allegedly signed illegally by Franklin Perez and Defendant Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, prior to allowing Plaintiff discovery in Anderson’s “Legally Related” Lawsuit and prior to allowing Plaintiff a single day in Court, acts as an attempt to bury the Iviewit/Eliot Bernstein Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit on Appeal in VIOLATION OF LAW. Illegal Subterfuge of the Lawsuit prior to following obligatory Substantive and Procedural Laws regarding reporting and investigating these material facts of MASSIVE CRIMINAL CONSPIRATORIAL ACTIVITY and prior to removing any of the germane Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law identified by Anderson and the Related Lawsuits. Dismissal of this lawsuit and the related lawsuits prior to investigating ALL of Anderson’s allegations and removing the illegal representations in this Lawsuit, preclude Plaintiff from a Fair and Impartial Court of Law and deny Plaintiff Due Process entirely. This FRAUD ON THE COURT by failure of this Court to follow both Procedural and Substantive Law, including MISPRISION OF FELONIES BY MEMBERS OF THE COURT and OBSTRUCTION, irrefutably Aids and Abets the Criminal RICO Organization. In fact, Dismissal of this Lawsuit prior to resolution of the “Legally Related” Anderson lawsuit in the District Court raises the brow, especially where Plaintiff is blocked from discovery in regards to the Criminal Allegations levied by Anderson and others in that Lawsuit as it relates to the “LEGALLY RELATED LAWSUITS”.

This Court’s hurried rulings to Dismiss all of the Appeals of the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, stands as a further illegal attempt to cover-up the crimes exposed by Anderson and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits against SENIOR NEW YORK AND FEDERAL PUBLIC OFFICIALS, including Senior Ranking Members of the New York and Federal Courts. These acts all further combine to deny Plaintiff rights to Discovery in the Anderson case, to find out for example whom the “Favored Law Firms and Lawyers” are that Anderson references in Criminal Obstruction charges in her Whistleblower Lawsuit.

This Court’s failure to therefore Halt this Lawsuit as demanded in the Motion to Compel filed with the Court [Footnote 64], until summoned investigators can investigate Whistleblower Anderson’s Felony Criminal Allegations, exposed in her sworn testimony in US Federal Court and before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee against Members of the US Attorney General’s Office, Members of the District Attorney Offices, Members of the New York Attorney General’s Office (under the leadership of Spitzer, Cuomo and Schneiderman), Members of the New York Court’s, as yet unidentified publically “Favored Lawyers and Law Firms,” the “Cleaner” and others, stands as clear and irrefutable evidence of continued Obstruction of Justice and more. Of course, Plaintiff does not anticipate that this Court can rule in favor of Plaintiff or follow any PROCEDURAL OR SUBSTANTIVE LAW, as it would result in Members of the Court ruling against themselves to serve very lengthy FEDERAL PRISON sentences for their part in the RICO, a slight CONFLICT OF INTEREST.

—–

[Footnote 64]

[64] “EMERGENCY Motion to Compel - HALT PROCEEDING PENDING CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND OVERSIGHT. REMOVE THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN THIS COURT THROUGH CESSATION OF VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL CANNONS, ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES, PUBLIC OFFICE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAW. RESTORE ORDER TO THIS COURT!” September 08, 2009 Filed with United States Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit (CIRCUS).

—–

This Obstruction acts as a phenomenon similar to a Concentration Camp Victim appealing to the Gestapo for Justice against the Camp Guards responsible for killing and torturing Camp Victims, or for Justice against Hitler, the odds of success and fair and impartial due process, nil. Therefore, this Court acts like a Nazi Court, not a UNITED STATES COURT, accomplice in the crimes and until such time that Members of this Court follow all Court Procedures and Rules and Law and confirm that they have ABSOLUTELY NO CONFLICT WITH THESE MATTERS PRIOR TO ADJUDICATING, then this Court has NO VALIDITY. In fact, this conflict free court may now only be possible in a court represented by NON ATTORNEYS AT LAW, a CITIZENS COURT to hear the crimes of TREASON, OBSTRUCTION, etc., which are levied herein against PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND JUSTICES. Again, I remind this Court to review the Nuremberg Judges Trial and wherefore I have no respect for this Court that follows neither its own rules or law and again spit upon those who have so desecrated this Court and the American System of Jurisprudence and await your Judgment Day in the next Judges Trial.

Again, Plaintiff would like additionally to WELCOME all of the new Second Circuit Officials who have FINGERPRINTED themselves by acting in any way whatsoever in the Iviewit Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, prior to signing an affirmed Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form provided. Kindly take this Motion as further OFFICIAL NOTICE of your culpability in this RICO Lawsuit, see the Motion to Compel for earlier NOTICE, that you have been CRIMINALLY COMPLAINED OF, both personally and professionally, to FEDERAL, STATE & INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES and other authoritative disciplinary agencies, who have oversight of This Court’s actions. The crimes reported against the Members of the Court are FELONY CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OF LAW and have been reported to numerous criminal authorities and oversights of this Court. Plaintiff awaits the formal responses to the Complaints and in the interim ignores the ILLEGAL ORDERS OF THIS COURT UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT ALL CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES HAVE FINALIZED THEIR ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS OF MEMBERS OF THE COURT. As you will soon see, the New York Attorney General Offices Complaints against you have been suppressed through now Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest.

Take this Motion as FURTHER OFFICIAL NOTICE that Members of this Court named herein, have, and will continue to be, included in ALL ongoing and future Iviewit/Eliot Bernstein Litigations, Criminal Complaints and Appeals/Rehearings of this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. The Iviewit Lawsuit is a 12 Count 12 Trillion Dollar Lawsuit, and as such, the named Members of this Court are required to report both the Criminal Complaints against them and all Current, Pending and Future threatened legal actions herein to all those with liabilities that may result from these matters. Report the LIABILITIES to all Insurance Carriers, Bond Holders, State and Federal Auditors and any other parties who may incur liabilities.

This Court now has Prima Facie evidence, from CREDIBLE EXPERT EYEWITNESS WHISTLEBLOWERS and Knowledge of THREATS ON FEDERAL WITNESSES and other FELONY CRIMES EXPOSED and therefore has LEGAL OBLIGATION to the report these FELONY CRIMES and all the other alleged crimes exposed by Anderson and Corrado. Reporting the FELONIES to all proper authorities or become further CULPABLE of FELONY CRIMES, including but not limited to, MISPRISION OF FELONY(IES), AIDING & ABETTING, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, RICO and more. Plaintiff quotes the following from Anderson’s Motion,

November 16, 2011 Anderson Motion – US District Court

V. Witness Tampering – Threat on Witness in a Federal Proceeding

“42. The Attorney General and the trial court were aware that in August of 2008, one of the plaintiff’s witnesses, DDC staff attorney Nicole Corrado, was threatened.

Two days prior to her deposition testimony, state employee, and [NEW YORK SUPREME COURT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE] DDC Deputy Chief Counsel, Andral N. Bratton, and who had been her immediate supervisor for approximately 5 years, confronted Corrado.

43. Following Corrado’s deposition testimony on August 21, 2008, Bratton’s behavior toward Corrado became more harassing, troubling, frightening and threatening as he began to follow her inside and outside of the state office where they both worked. Corrado subsequently reported these serious issues to DDC chief counsel Allan Friedberg, Deputy chief Counsel Sherry Cohen, a defendant in the current proceeding, and DDC Chief Investigator Vincent Raniere - all of whom who took no required action.

Other Iviewit News

“Another One Bites the Dust! Defendant in Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson’s Federal Lawsuit, Sherry K. Cohen of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee joins Thomas Cahill in early retirement.” [Footnote 65]

—–

[Footnote 65]

[65] “New York Supreme Court Whistleblower. Corruption in New Your Courts - Enough is Enough.” Ethics Complaint - Industry Whistleblower Blog by Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox Tuesday, February 15, 2011

http://www.ethicscomplaint.com/2011/02/new-york-supreme-court-whistleblower.html

and

http://www.suppressthetruth.com/2010/09/andrew-cuomo-new-york-attorney-general.html

and

Frank Brady aka Kevin McKeown @ Expose Corrupt Courts

—–

Further, this Court has absolute knowledge and further Prima Facie evidence from Anderson and Corrado of these CRIMES through depositions under oath submitted in the Anderson Lawsuit, including but not limited to Testimony and Sworn Statements to the NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE and on record at the NY Senate Judiciary Committee. [Footnote 66]   The Conflicts and Violations of Law further compel this Court, presumed now to be composed of new non-conflicted Justices and Court Administrators hearing this Motion with signed Conflict of Interest Disclosures returned prior to any action, to now Act according to both Substantive and Procedural Law and remove and REPORT all FELONY Obstructions and other crimes. The first step to a fair and impartial Court would be in having an exhaustive conflict checks done by anyone attempting to respond to this Motion to save Plaintiff from filing additional CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against those that fail.

—–

[Footnote 66]

[66] Plaintiff incorporates by reference herein Any/All records from the “Legally Related” Anderson Whistleblower Lawsuit, the “Legally Related” Lawsuits and any/all other legal records relating to Nicole Corrado, in any legal matters in the US District Court, this Court or any other court and any/all other Regulatory and Investigate Entities acting in these matters. Records, including but are not limited to, all “SEALED” and “IMPOUNDED RECORDS” that relate to these matters. PLAINTIFF DEMANDS that these records be instantly made part of this Lawsuit and incorporated in this MOTION, CERTIFIED and CATALOGUED and ENTERED IN THE DOCKET, due to the ALLEGATIONS by Anderson of DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION IN OFFICIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS, including matters now before this Court and the District Court, as further defined herein.

—–

INTENTIONAL FAILURE TO REPORT THE CRIMES EXPOSED constitutes further crimes that act to AID & ABET the CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATION and shield it from prosecution. MEMBERS OF THIS COURT adjudicating this Lawsuit thus far, have committed [Footnote 67], including but not limited to, Misprision(s) of Felony(ies) for failure to report FELONY THREATS ON A FEDERAL WITNESS, TAMPERING WITH A FEDERAL WITNESS, FELONY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN FEDERAL PROCEEDINGS and more, AS EXPOSED BY BOTH ANDERSON and CORRADO. MEMBERS OF THIS COURT CURRENTLY ADJUDICATING THIS RICO AND THE RELATED LAWSUITS HAVE CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS ALREADY FILED AGAINST THEM for AIDING & ABETTING a CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATION, MULTIPLE COUNTS OF FEDERAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, MULTIPLE COUNTS OF FEDERAL MISPRISION OF FELONY(IES) and much much much more.

—–

[Footnote 67]

[67] http://www.defraudingamerica.com/title_18_usc_4.html

Federal Crime Reporting Statutes

The federal offense of failure to disclose a felony, if coupled with some act concealing the felony, such as suppression of evidence, harboring or protecting the person performing the felony, intimidation or harming a witness, or any other act designed to conceal from authorities the fact that a crime has been committed.

Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. Misprision of felony. Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

A federal judge, or any other government official, is required as part of the judge’s mandatory administrative duties, to receive any offer of information of a federal crime. If that judge blocks such report, that block is a felony under related obstruction of justice statutes, and constitutes a serious offense.

Upon receiving such information, the judge is then required to make it known to a government law enforcement body that is not themselves involved in the federal crime.

——————————————————————————–

Misprision of a Felony

Misprision of a felony is the offense of failure to inform government authorities of a felony that a person knows about. A person commits the crime of misprision of a felony if that person:

Knows of a federal crime that the person has witnessed or that has come to the person’s attention, or failed to prevent.

Fails to report it to a federal judge or other federal official (who is not thems4elves involved in the crime).

——————————————————————————–

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.

This federal statute permits any citizen to file a lawsuit in the federal courts to obtain a court order requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful acts. This statute is Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361.

Obstructing Justice Statutes

Title 18 U.S.C. § 2. Principals. (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

Note: The legislative intent to punish as a principal not only one who directly commits an offense and one who “aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures” another to commit an offense, but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him guilty of an offense against the United States. Case law decisions: Rothenburg v. United States, 1918, 38 S.Ct. 18, 245 U.S. 480, 62 L.Ed. 414, and United States v. Giles, 1937, 57 S.Ct. 340, 300 U.S. 41, 81 L.Ed. 493.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 3. Accessory after the fact. Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States had been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 (misprision of felony). Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1505. Whoever corruptly … influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due the proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States … shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1510. Obstruction of criminal investigation.

(a) Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the United States by any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to–

(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;

(2) cause or induce any person to–

(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;

(3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(c) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from–

(1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding;

(2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense … (3) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a Federal offense; or

(4) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation preceding, to be sought or instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or proceeding;

or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(e) For the purposes of this section–

(1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense; and

(2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant.

(a) Whoever knowingly engages in any conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to another person or damages the tangible property of another person, or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against any person for (1) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or (2) any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense …”

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 111. Impeding certain officers or employees. Whoever … intimidates, or interferes with any person … while engaged in … the performance of his official duties shall be fined … or imprisoned …

——————————————————————————-

Racketeering Enterprise Statutes and Criteria

Title 42 USC § 1961. Definition. As used in this chapter-(1) “racketeering activity” means:

(A) any act or threat involving … relating to 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations), section 1511 (relating to obstruction of State or local law enforcement), section 1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery or extortion), section 1952 (relating to racketeering, …

Title 42 USC § 1962. Prohibited Activities.

(b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern or racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce.

(c) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.

(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsections (a), (b), or (c) of this section. …

JUDICIAL Canon 3. A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Impartially and Diligently

(D) Disciplinary responsibilities.

(1) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a substantial violation of this Part shall take appropriate action.

(2) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a substantial violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility shall take appropriate action.

(3) Acts of a judge in the discharge of disciplinary responsibilities are part of a judge’s judicial duties.

—–

Therefore, due to the ENORMOUS CONFLICTS and VIOLATIONS OF LAW in this Court, Plaintiff demands IMMEDIATE DISQUALIFICATION of ALL Justices and other Members of the Second Circuit Court who have already acted in Violation of Law in these matters and whom have been reported to authorities for their CRIMINAL ACTS and to IMMEDIATELY CALL IN A FEDERAL MONITOR to OVERSIGHT THIS COURT. In seeking DISQUALIFICATION of the current JUSTICES OF THIS COURT, PLAINTIFF ALSO DEMANDS FULL REMOVAL OF ALL PRIOR ILLEGALLY TENDERED RULINGS and ORDERS and SUBMISSIONS OF ANY ATTORNEY AT LAW IN THESE MATTERS, ALL tendered in Conflicts of Interests, Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons and State & Federal Law as already described herein and in the US District Court and this Court’s filings.

What causes the “Disqualification of Judges?” Federal law requires the automatic disqualification of a Federal judge under certain circumstances.

In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge’s impartiality. If a judge’s attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified.” [Emphasis added]. Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994).

Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) (what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance); United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) (Section 455(a) “is directed against the appearance of partiality, whether or not the judge is actually biased.”) (”Section 455(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. §455(a), is not intended to protect litigants from actual bias in their judge but rather to promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process.”).

That Court also stated that Section 455(a) “requires a judge to recuse himself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989). In Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972), the Court stated that “It is important that the litigant not only actually receive justice, but that he believes that he has received justice.”

The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that “justice must satisfy the appearance of justice”, Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954). A judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he is presiding, does not give the appearance of justice.

“Recusal under Section 455 is self-executing; a party need not file affidavits in support of recusal and the judge is obligated to recuse herself sua sponte under the stated circumstances.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989).

Further, the judge has a legal duty to disqualify himself even if there is no motion asking for his disqualification. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals further stated that “We think that this language [455(a)] imposes a duty on the judge to act sua sponte, even if no motion or affidavit is filed.” Balistrieri, at 1202.

Judges do not have discretion not to disqualify themselves. By law, they are bound to follow the law. Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has given another example of his “appearance of partiality” which, possibly, further disqualifies the judge. Should another judge not accept the disqualification of the judge, then the second judge has evidenced an “appearance of partiality” and has possibly disqualified himself/herself. None of the orders issued by any judge who has been disqualified by law would appear to be valid. It would appear that they are void as a matter of law, and are of no legal force or effect.

Should a judge not disqualify himself, then the judge is in violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) (”The right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause.”).

Should a judge issue any order after he has been disqualified by law, and if the party has been denied of any of his / her property, then the judge may have been engaged in the Federal Crime of “interference with interstate commerce”. The judge has acted in the judge’s personal capacity and not in the judge’s judicial capacity. It has been said that this judge, acting in this manner, has no more lawful authority than someone’s next-door neighbor (provided that he is not a judge). However some judges may not follow the law.

If you were a non-represented litigant, and should the court not follow the law as to non-represented litigants, then the judge has expressed an “appearance of partiality” and, under the law, it would seem that he/she has disqualified him/herself.

However, since not all judges keep up to date in the law, and since not all judges follow the law, it is possible that a judge may not know the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court and the other courts on this subject. Notice that it states “disqualification is required” and that a judge “must be disqualified” under certain circumstances.

The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he acts without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason, and may be engaged in extortion and the interference with interstate commerce.

Courts have repeatedly ruled that judges have no immunity for their criminal acts. Since both treason and the interference with interstate commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.

Failure by ALL Parties to this Lawsuit, including the Justices of this Court, to Affirm or Deny Conflict to Opposing Counsel, Pro Se Bernstein, as repeatedly requested by Plaintiff since day one of the Lawsuit, in order to assure fair and impartial Due Process, constitutes FRAUD ON THE COURT. Especially where there is overwhelming evidence of FRAUD and OBSTRUCTION, including eyewitness insider sworn testimony. After Anderson’s claims of “Favored Law Firms and Lawyers” operating in the Court System to Obstruct Cases through FEDERAL & STATE FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS OF OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION, THREATENING A FEDERAL WITNESS and more. This Court is obligated to now PROVE to PLAINTIFF NOW that NO CONFLICTS EXIST going forward, removing ALL Conflicts currently in play and complained of to this Court and the District Court instantly. The denial of Discovery to Plaintiff by the Court to Anderson’s information and further attempts to bury Anderson’s suit entirely prior to investigating the CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS, creates a lack of ability to identify at this time whom Anderson refers to as the “Favored Law Firms and Lawyers.” The lack of knowledge stemming from the Obstructions, which precludes knowing whom these CORRUPTED LAWYERS & LAW FIRMS are, absolutely necessitates that ALL ATTORNEYS AT LAW handling these matters, including but not limited to, Judges, Prosecutors, Court Personnel, Opposing Counsel and all LAW FIRMS representing these matters, must now be PRE-SCREENED to determine if they acted or are acting in CONFLICT and VIOLATION OF LAW. ALL ATTORNEYS IN ANY CAPACITY must now be pre-screened for Conflict to determine if they are one of the yet unidentified “Favored Lawyers and Law Firms” that Anderson and others have fingered.

Where there should be no Conflicts of Interest in the Lawsuit with those adjudicating and representing the matters in any legal capacity, we instead find an insipid stream of Conflicts polluting this Lawsuit. In some instances Defendants/Opposing Counsels/PRO SE DEFENDANTS FROM PROSKAUER ROSE, acting in Conflict to respond for themselves in the AMENDED COMPLAINT RESPONSE, have already been ordered for investigation for their Conflicts and Appearances of Impropriety. Where Plaintiff has requested Conflict of Interest Disclosures similar to the one attached herein be signed by all Parties prior to adjudicating this matter, Plaintiff’s requests have been REPEATEDLY ignored. There can be no reason not to sign a Conflict of Interest Disclosure, as each Attorney at Law is obligated to act without Conflict, so if no Conflict exists the form should be a no brainer. Conflict checks can no longer be ignored, especially with the Anderson allegations exposing ATTORNEYS AT LAW VIOLATING THE LAW IN CONFLICT OF INTEREST and OTHER MORE SERIOUS FELONY CRIMES, and additionally the RIVETING new Admission and Acknowledgement of Conflict by the New York Attorney General. The Attorney General now claiming their offices need to seek INDEPENDENT NON CONFLICTED counsel to represent them and their STATE ACTOR CLIENT DEFENDANTS, discussed at length in the next section. The CONFLICTS of the Attorney General and other violations of Public Office, which have caused Obstruction and Denial of Due Process in the Lawsuit since day one, now INVALIDATE ALL prior representations made by the New York Attorney General on behalf of both themselves and in defense of their client STATE ACTOR Defendant Clients in this Lawsuit. Anderson has also called for the ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL to IMMEDIATELY CEASE.

Plaintiff again presumes that at this point in this Motion, NEW Non-Conflicted Justices of this Court, Non-Conflicted Counsel for Defendants and Non-conflicted State Officials, are now reading this Motion and have already signed a Conflict of Interest Disclosure as attached, assuming both PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES if discovery of Conflict is later found. Plaintiff presumes a timely response to this Motion but disregards any ILLEGALLY TENDERED Order or Edict proffered by the Members of this Court handling these matters illegally and without assurance of a conflict free forum and DEMANDS all new parties going forward sign and affirm the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure. Assurance of NO CONFLICTS in the form of a signed and notarized Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, as the one attached herein. Again, signed by ALL Law Firms, Prosecutors, Regulators, Justices, Attorneys at Law and Court Personnel, representing the Government in ANY WAY, as required by law, returned by Certified Mail to Plaintiffs Address at 2753 NW 34th St. Boca Raton, FL 33434, prior to ANY ACTION.

III. REMAND, HALT AND REHEAR THIS RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT DUE TO THE NEW YORK STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL’S NOW ADMITTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, BOTH PAST AND PRESENT, IN ACTING ILLEGALLY AS COUNSEL THEIR OFFICE AND ADDITIONALLY FOR 39 PLUS STATE DEFENDANT/ACTORS IN THIS LAWSUIT, BY VIOLATING PUBLIC OFFICE RULES & REGULATIONS, ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES AND STATE & FEDERAL LAW

At this time, the New York Attorney General’s Office should have already noticed this Court and other Authorities of Admitted and Acknowledged Conflicts of Interest and their voluntary disqualification from this RICO Lawsuit. Further admission of need for INDEPENDENT NON CONFLICTED COUNSEL TO REPRESENT THEIR OFFICES IN THIS LAWSUIT FORWARD and further, THAT THEIR CLIENT/DEFENDANTS NOW ALSO NEED SEPARATE COUNSEL TO REPRESENT BOTH THEIR PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL INTERESTS, due to the Conflicts of Interest, which now preclude the New York Attorney General from illegally and in Conflict of Interest representing them too. If the New York Attorney General and its members handling this Lawsuit have not already filed for their Disqualification from this Lawsuit and submitted either to represent themselves Pro Se or new legal counsel, here again would be reason for further CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against the Members of the New York Attorney General’s Office.

The INACTION would constitute further cause for further FELONY STATE & FEDERAL charges of Obstruction of Justice, Misprision of Felony(ies), Fraud on the Courts, Violation of Public Office and State and Federal Law and more. On April 14, 2011, James Rogers, Esq. Special Counsel and Senior Advisor to New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman, ADMITTED and ACKNOWLEDGED Conflicts of Interest for both himself personally and the New York Attorney General’s Office relating to CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS FILED WITH THEIR OFFICES AND THIS LAWSUIT [Footnote 68] that precluded them from further direct action in any matter. Conflicts of Interest that Rogers admitted preclude both Rogers and the AG’s office from handling or even speaking about any matters related to Iviewit and Eliot Bernstein’s Criminal Complaints and this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, in any capacity, without INDEPENDENT NON CONFLICTED COUNSEL REPRESENTING THEM. These recently ADMITTED & ACKNOWLEDGED Conflicts of Interest that preclude the AG from acting in any other capacity than as Defendant, have existed in this Lawsuit for the New York Attorney General since the initiation of the Lawsuit. The problem prior was that despite directly asking the AG to affirm or deny conflict directly they refused to answer and had Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin instead ascertain if she thought their offices were conflicted, Scheindlin claimed at the time in her ruling that she did not see a conflict at the time or words to that effect, but if one were to later surface in the Lawsuit it would have to be considered for the AG’s Disqualification. Well with the Admission that time has come and now we must LOOK BACKWARD to fix the problem, by removing the Conflicted ILLEGAL representations that were designed from the start to OBSTRUCT and perpetrate FRAUD on the COURT, a rehearing without the conflicts. The conflicts were, with scienter, ILLEGALLY ignored by the previous AG Administrations of Spitzer and Cuomo, in order to COVER UP THE CRIMES, but this Admission now provides further irrefutable Prima Facie evidence of the Conflicts, conflict that should have precluded the prior administrations from the start from representing any other parties in the Lawsuit. Because of the illegal representations in conflict prior by the AG, who happens to represent ILLEGALLY, a large pool of the Defendants in this Lawsuit, the ENTIRE LAWSUIT MUST NOW BE REMANDED TO BE HEARD FREE OF THE POLLUTANT CONFLICTS. The Conflicts OBSTRUCTED JUSTICE and was achieved through FRAUD ON THE COURTS by OFFICERS OF THE COURTS, DENYING PLAINTIFF DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURE for almost a decade, therefore can be no further delay in REMANDING THE LAWSUIT BACK TO THE DISTRICT COURT FOR REHEARING. Plaintiff DEMANDS an IMMEDIATE REHEARING FREE OF SUCH CONFLICTS and ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS and with all Defendants directly benefiting by the PRIOR and CURRENT ILLEGAL CONFLICTS of the AG, now forced to seek similar NON CONFLICTED COUNSEL FOR both personal and professional liabilities in the matters forward, as proscribed by Law and Professional Rules. Finally, that this COURT FORMALLY FILE CHARGES AND NOTICE REGARDING THEIR KNOWLEDGE of these ATTORNEY AT LAW MISCONDUCTS AND VIOLATIONS’ OF LAW to all proper authorities as proscribed by law.

—–

[Footnote 68]

[68]Taped Conversations with New York Governor Andrew Cuomo office, Steven M. Cohen (Chief of Staff), James Rogers, Esq., and Emily Cole.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pwFlEIp6E

—–

The taped phone calls between Eliot Bernstein and Governor Cuomo’s office with Emily Cole, Steven Michael Cohen [Footnote 69] and the New York Attorney General’s office, culminating in Rogers ultimate ADMISSION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT of Conflicts of Interest are located at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pwFlEIp6E , hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein. In the TAPED CALL, Cohen ironically responds to the statement by Plaintiff that he was attempting to “Put him in Prison” as he was named in the complaint, and therefore, could not handle the complaints naming him in RICO CRIMINAL activity any further, due to the obvious inherent conflict and Cohen retorts “Some would say I already am in Prison!” At which point Plaintiff responded, “I agree!” Yet, Cohen continued to act further in Conflict in his Official Capacity, now referring Plaintiff back to the AG despite the acknowledged conflict? Emily Cole, Cohen’s assistant stated in the taped call prior to Cohen’s involvement that she had turned the complaints over to Cohen directly months earlier further showing the Obstruction through Conflict had been ongoing for months.

—–

[Footnote 69]

[69]As of July 11, 2011, Cohen has been relieved of service to Andrew Cuomo.

“NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN ADMISSION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BY JAMES ROGERS, ESQ. IN HANDLING IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES & ELIOT BERNSTEIN’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST ANDREW CUOMO AND STEVEN M. COHEN. DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION OF ANDREW CUOMO AND ELIOT SPITZER FOR VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICE RULES & FELONY RICO CRIMES. CALL FOR NY ATTORNEY GENERAL TO CEASE ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS OF STATE SENIOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS, INCLUDING FORMER CHIEF JUDGE OF NEW YORK JUDITH KAYE IN THE IVIEWIT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL RICO AND ANTITRUST LAWSUIT, “LEGALLY RELATED” BY FEDERAL JUDGE SHIRA SCHEINDLIN TO A WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT OF CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON A NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY. Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner Main Suspects in Patent Theft Worth Trillions.”

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=588

and

“Steven Michael Cohen, Andrew Cuomo Sr. Adviser Flees Sinking Cuomo Ship Over Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein’s Criminal Complaints against Cohen and Cuomo. Gotham Corruption at the Top Heating Up”

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=591

—–

On May 20, 2011, a formal letter titled,

Re: / Phone Call on April 14, 2011 with James Rogers on behalf of Harlan Levy referred by Steven Michael Cohen, Chief of Staff to Governor Andrew Cuomo, regarding FILED Criminal Complaints against the New York Attorney General’s Office, Former Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Steven Michael Cohen, Secretary to Governor Andrew Cuomo and Monica Connell of the New York State Office of the Attorney General et al.” ( Letter )

was sent by Plaintiff memorializing the calls with the New York Attorney General Office and Governor Andrew Cuomo’s Office. The Letter also contains additional Criminal Complaints against new participants in the RICO, including Cuomo’s alleged niece, Emily Cuomo Cole, which can be found at the following URL’s, both hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=588

and

Andrew Cuomo / Emily Cuomo Cole Calls

.

From that letter, quote,

Dear Mssrs. Levy and Rogers,

Please let this letter serve as formal commemoration of our April 14, 2011 phone conversation between James Rogers, Esq., Special Counsel and Senior Advisor to Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman and myself. A witnessing party on the phone call was Patrick Hanley. The following summarizes the salient points of the call with James Rogers, Esq., acting on behalf of Harlan Levy referred by Steven Michael Cohen, Chief of Staff to Governor Andrew Cuomo and prior calls with the Governor’s office.

Notably, Rogers acknowledged and admitted that he was precluded from handling the matters related to Iviewit’s Criminal Complaints and RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, as the Attorney General was Conflicted in the matters, as further defined herein. Admissions by Rogers of existing Conflicts of Interest now require IMMEDIATE corrective actions in ongoing State, Federal and International Criminal and Civil Proceedings going forward. The multiple Conflicts of Interest identified, caused Rogers to assert that the inherent Conflicts for himself, the Attorney General’s Office and other members of the Attorney General’s Office, now demanded that the Attorney General’s office was required forthwith, to seek Outside Non Conflicted Independent Counsel in any related matters…

… The Conflict Swamp further thickens, when taking into account Conflicts created by the Attorney General’s additional role as Legal Counsel for State Actors/Defendants in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. The Attorney General’s Office is not only representing their own offices and employees in conflict, but also, illegally representing 39 PLUS State Actors/Defendants as counsel of record, in further Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, and yet, still directly handle Criminal Complaints naming them as central Criminal RICO Actors. Additional Conflicts of Interest are further created by the illegal twofold representation by the Attorney General of the State Actors/Defendants in both a Professional and Personal capacity. The Attorney General may represent State Actors/Defendants in Lawsuits in a PROFESSIONAL capacity only on the State of New York’s funds and the Individual representations are illegal and further Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, further defined herein. This entire bizarre and convoluted myriad of ILLEGAL Conflicts of Interest and Obstructions create further massive Frauds on the Courts and Frauds on a Multiplicity of Government Agencies, all combining to further illegally deny Due Process and Obstruct Justice…

…Anderson further complains to the Federal Court in a Motion to Remove the Attorney General[Footnote 13] from illegal legal representations that CUOMO IS ILLEGALLY REPRESENTING STATE ACTORS/DEFENDANTS in both the US District Court for the Southern District of New York and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in her case and the “legally related” cases. Anderson filed to remove the Attorney General from her Whistleblower Lawsuit for ILLEGAL Conflicts of Interest and other Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State& Federal Law, illustrating a further Pattern and Practice of Public Corruption designed to evade prosecution.

Anderson Footnote [13]

Anderson’s Motion to Remove the Attorney General can be found at the following URL’s and Anderson’s arguments for removing the Attorney General in that Motion and her Lawsuit are hereby fully incorporated by reference as my own arguments in this Motion, where they are applicable to our “legally related” lawsuits.

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=391

“Wednesday, September 15, 2010 “Anderson Moves to Disqualify NY Attorney General”

Frank Brady aka Kevin McKeown @ Expose Corrupt Courts

ACTIONS TO REMOVE ADMITTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST FROM ALL PROCEEDINGS AND CEASE AND DESIST ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS OF STATE ACTORS/DEFENDANTS BY THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL

As Anderson’s Motion to Disqualify the Attorney General’s Office shows, there are Conflicts of Interest inherent in the ILLEGAL legal representations of the Public Officers both personally and professionally by the New York Attorney General’s office, which preclude such representations. Therefore, since the conflicted representations are in Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, all instances of these illegal representations must instantly Cease and Desist, and proper remedial actions taken.

First, all State Actors/Defendants illegally represented currently by the Attorney General, now must be replaced with Non-Conflicted Independent Counsel, separate counsel for both their Professional and Individual Legal Defenses where they are sued in both capacities. In particular, Anderson claims, quote,

“Ongoing Conflict of Interest”

Representation by the New York Attorney General’s office in the pending appeal continues the improper prejudice against plaintiff. Furthermore, not only did the Attorney General’s representation of the defendants unduly prejudice the plaintiff, but it also raised serious conflict of interest issues with respect to the defendants themselves. To protect their own rights, each of the defendants had to have their own attorneys in order to permit them to cross claim or make admissions, including their own right to protect their own individual rights in this appeal. Under New York State and federal conflict of interest rules, each of the defendants must be free to undertake these independent actions. To do so, they must have their own counsel. (See NYS Code of Professional Conduct Cannon 5 Conflict of Interest Rules. [15]) The Attorney General as a state attorney is bound by these rules as well. Anderson Footnote [16]

This constitutes New York State law, and the attorney who violates these safeguards must be immediately removed from the case. Further, should the defendants seek to waive the conflicts they would have to submit an affidavit to that effect to the court.

Notwithstanding a defendant’s attempt to waive his right to independent counsel, the court can deny the waiver, based on a finding that ultimately this conflict cannot properly be waived.

The trail [sic trial] court improperly ignored the obligation to address the inherent conflict up to and including the trial. This court, however, must now disqualify the Attorney General from any representation of the defendants.

As a result of these conflict of interest issues, the Attorney General cannot properly represent the defendants, either as a group or individually, in these appellate proceedings. Each defendant must have the right to advance his or her own position on appeal, to cross claim against the others, and to bring a counterclaim against the State.

These actions most certainly could not be undertaken in a case where the Attorney General represents all the named defendants. All defendants clearly are in conflict with each other, especially in their individual capacities. Without question, the Attorney General violated its ethical rules and the public trust in undertaking to represent all of the defendants. The Attorney General continues to violate its ethical rules by appearing before this appellate body.

This would be the case, even were it established that the defendants had sought to consent to such representation…

The conflict here is particularly acute given the nature of the claims brought by plaintiff Anderson. Plaintiff’s charges warranted an independent investigation by the New York State Attorney General’s office to review the basic claims given that Anderson was formerly a Departmental Disciplinary Committee staff attorney with considerable experience and over the years received excellent evaluations. The fact is that these are not allegations from a lay person.

While at the DDC, Plaintiff Anderson was charged with investigating cases involving possible criminal and civil misconduct by attorneys. She carried out her duties as a duly authorized officer of the Court. The New York State Attorney General’s Office was therefore obligated to protect her and to investigate her claims of serious misconduct against the named parties. To the Contrary, the New York State Attorney General’s Office failed to do so.

The Attorney General is a publicly funded arm of the State. It was conflicted from the outset of this case because it could not possibly defend any of the defendants, while simultaneously investigating plaintiff’s claims of serious ongoing misconduct by the defendants. Indeed, no explanation has ever been provided as to why the Attorney General did not represent plaintiff Anderson against any of the original defendants. This was itself a misappropriation of public funds by a state investigative agency with prosecution powers.

Federal law mandates that a special prosecutor be substituted into the case, and this was not done.”

[Footnotes from Anderson filing]

Anderson Footnote [15]

Conflict of Interest Disciplinary Rule 5

Anderson Footnote [16]As head of the Department of Law, the Attorney General is both the “People’s Lawyer” and the State’s chief legal officer. As the “People’s Lawyer,” the Attorney General serves as the guardian of the legal rights of the citizens of New York, its organizations and its natural resources. In his role as the State’s chief legal counsel, the Attorney General not only advises the Executive Branch of Slate government, but also defends actions and proceedings on behalf of the State. —…

…Similar to Anderson, in my RICO & ANTITRUST lawsuit, the Attorney General not only represents 39 plus State Actors/Defendants ILLEGALLY, both personally and professionally, but also acts as in further conflict as Counsel for their own offices and former employees, in both the US District Court and Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Evidence of such representations can be found in the Attorney General’s response to the Amended Complaint in US District Court, which was GRANTED & DOCKETED by Judge Scheindlin in the following Order, included by reference in entirety herein, SCHEINDLIN ORDER GRANTING THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

The Amended Complaint was responded to ILLEGALLY by the Attorney General’s Office, whom was wearing a number of conflicting hats, acting as both a State Actor/Defendant and Defense Counsel to other State Actor/Defendants, all represented ILLEGALLY both Professionally and in their Individual capacities. Once again, a further bizarre and illegal myriad of Conflicts of Interest exposed, again in Violation of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Offices Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, combining to further Block Due Process & Procedure of the victims through Obstruction Justice to both the Criminal Complaints and the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

Whereby this Court and anyone now adjudicating or handling the case for this Court, is now officially served the Letter in entirety via this Motion, as the Letter is relevant to these proceedings and additionally carries additional LIABILITIES for Members of this Court to report to State Auditors or others with Liabilities.

The admission of Conflicts of Interest in these matters has now forced the NY Attorney General’s office to refuse to further handle or even speak to Plaintiff regarding the Criminal Complaints filed with their offices or this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. The Attorney General instead stating they are seeking INDEPENDENT NON CONFLICTED COUNSEL to represent their offices forward in this RICO and INDEPENDENT NON CONFLICTED PROSECUTORS to investigate the CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS they have Obstructed for several years, including CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS naming Members of this Court as central conspirators in the Cover-Up crimes.

KUDOS, to the integrity of Scheinderman’s Attorney General Office and Mr. Rogers for admitting that the New York Attorney General’s Office is ABSOLUTELY CONFLICTED in this Lawsuit and the Criminal Complaints. Further, for seeking INDEPENDENT NON CONFLICTED PARTIES to now represent and investigate these matters forward for their office and officials of their office named in this Lawsuit, Anderson’s Lawsuit and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits. The admission and disqualification of the AG from Conflicts breaks down one of main conflicts in the WALL OF OBSTRUCTIONARY CONFLICTS obstructing this Lawsuit from day one. Prior to the Admission, New York Attorney Generals Spitzer and Cuomo, flagrantly and with SCIENTER violated Conflict of Interest rules with the blessing and APPROVAL FROM MEMBERS OF THE COURTS in Violation of Law. These Violations denied PLAINTIFF DUE PROCESS AND PROCEDURE THROUGH FRAUD ON THE COURTS achieved through the VIOLATION OF ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES, VIOLATION OF PUBLIC OFFICE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND VIOLATION OF STATE AND FEDERAL LAW.

The Admission and Acknowledgement of Conflicts of Interest are reason for this Court to IMMEDIATELY REMAND this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, the Anderson Whistleblower Lawsuit and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits, back to the US District Court for rehearings. REHEARINGS free of ALL Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL CANNONS, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, by ALL parties acting illegally in Conflict, which has polluted these proceedings, constituting a CONSPIRATORIAL FRAUD ON THE COURT. Members of this Court who have handled this case thus far, similarly must now DISQUALIFY themselves from handling this Lawsuit as they too are CONFLICTED, being accused in the CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS of AIDING & ABETTING the former ATTORNEY GENERALS via OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE IN THESE PROCEEDINGS, MISPRISION OF FELONIES and more.

Plaintiff hopes that henceforth, the NEW JUSTICES of THIS COURT now ruling on these matters, including this Motion to REMAND the Lawsuits back, have already signed the attached CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE PRIOR TO RULING or even reading this section. To rule or act further without a signed Conflict of Interest disclosure will result in NEW CRIMINAL CHARGES filed against any person who fails to disclose. The first order of business for new members of this Court who comply with the Conflict Check should be REPORTING all FELONY CRIMES cited herein, involving all PRIOR JUSTICES, the DEFENDANT NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL and their CLIENT/DEFENDANTS, all for their parts in AIDING & ABETTING a CRIMINAL RICO ORG, OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE, MISPRISION OF FELONY(IES), FRAUD ON THE COURT and more.

IV. REMAND AND REHEAR THIS LAWSUIT DUE TO THE NEW YORK STATE SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON’S FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SENIOR COURT OFFICIALS, PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND MORE.

This Court now has brand new knowledge of CRIMINAL ACTIVITY that has been submitted with PRIMA FACIE evidence herein, including CREDIBLE EYEWITNESSES SWORN STATEMENTS, SWORN TESTIMONY IN FEDERAL COURT and TAPED ADMISSION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST in these matters. All of these acts constitute a plethora of continuing Felony Crimes and therefore the Justices now handling this case who posses this Evidence and Knowledge of Crimes must now report these NEW FELONY CRIMES to all proper authorities and take all corrective actions to remove the Conflicts forward.

Further, this Court must demand all New York State Defendants and others acting in conflict out of further representations to seek independent counsel, both Personally and Professionally, and any other actions required by law, rule or cannon, such as reporting all these crimes and resulting liabilities to ANY PARTY with resulting liabilities. Failure to report these NEW CRIMINAL ACTS will result in further Felony Criminal Charges for MISPRISION OF FELONY, AIDING & ABETTING A CRIMINAL RICO ORIGINATION and other VIOLATIONS of STATE, FEDERAL & INTERNATIONAL LAW. Whistleblower Anderson, again, a seasoned Supreme Court of New York Attorney, expert in ATTORNEY MISCONDUCT COMPLAINTS, presented Corroborating evidence to this Court of Violations of Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law by the New York Attorney General and others.

Anderson’s “Notice of Motion to Disqualifying the Office of the New York State Attorney General from Representation of Defendants” is located at the following URL’s, both fully incorporated by reference in entirety herein,

Frank Brady aka Kevin McKeown Document Anderson

and

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=391 .

ALL APPLICABLE and RELEVANT ARGUMENTS regarding the Misconduct and ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS OF THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL contained within the Anderson Motion to DISQUALIFY the ATTORNEY GENERAL from the Anderson Lawsuit, are wholly incorporated herein in entirety for consideration in this Motion to DISQUALIFY THE ATTORNEY GENERAL FROM THIS PROCEEDING. The New York Attorney General’s Office and current and former members of the office already Defendants in these matters should remain in the case however, as Defendants only and need now also seek INDEPENDENT NON CONFLICTED Attorneys at Law to represent them in their PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL capacities in the crimes alleged herein.

With the removal of the New York Attorney General as Counsel to the State Actors/Defendants, each State Official must now retain new NON CONFLICTED COUNSELORS, one to represent them Personally and one Professionally. Anderson’s Motion to DISQUALIFY the Attorney General for ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS in her Whistleblower Lawsuit and in Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel show that New York State Funds and Resources are being illegally used to ILLEGALLY represent PUBLIC OFFICIALS in both their PERSONAL and PROFESSIONAL capacities, in Violation of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules and Regulations and State and Federal Law. Again, attempts by THIS COURT to continue to allow these ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS, THEFT, and FRAUD of PUBLIC RESOURCES by STATE OFFICIALS, by failure to end these crimes in THIS COURT or even report the CRIMES as mandated by Law to Criminal Authorities, will result in ADDITIONAL CRIMINAL CHARGES AGAINST MEMBERS OF THIS COURT.

As already described herein, the Whistleblower Lawsuit of Christine C. Anderson exposes a multitude of CRIMINAL FELONY ACTIVITIES of PUBLIC OFFICIALS and COURT OFFICIALS directly related to the adjudication of this Lawsuit and several of those FINGERED PUBLIC OFFICIALS ARE SIMILARLY DEFENDANTS IN THIS LAWSUIT. CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS have been lodged by Plaintiff against those named officials fingered by Anderson and those “caught with their hand in cookie jar” feeding on the trough of public office corruption and crimes, including Members of this Court named herein, who have all Aided & Abetted the corrupt practices through further CRIMINAL FELONY ACTS to DENY DUE PROCESS AND AID AND ABET IN THE THEFT OF THE IVIEWIT INTELLECTUAL PROPERTIES. With the REMOVAL of the New York Attorney General office for admitted Conflicts of Interest that preclude their future involvement, other than as Defendant, in both this Lawsuit and the CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS filed with their offices, which now need Independent Investigators to investigate, this case must be REMANDED back to the US District Court for IMMEDIATE REHEARING. REHEARING must start with CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS to determine who exactly is involved in the Conspiracy within the Courts, as while Anderson named specifically several key players, she left several of the agencies, lawyers, law firms and court personnel unidentified or those records remain sealed or are missing from the courts’ dockets.

Conflicts of Interest and multitudes of Violations of State & Federal Law already identified to the Courts in this Lawsuit, Anderson’s suit and the “Legally Related” Anderson lawsuits, especially those where the New York Attorney General Illegally Represented State Defendants ILLEGALLY must next be prosecuted prior to this Lawsuit proceeding on a civil level. The Attorney General’s Conflicts of Interests have melted into an orgy of Obstruction committed by ALL PARTIES REPRESENTING the Defendants and ALL THOSE HEARING this LAWSUIT that are licensed ATTORNEYS AT LAW, all acting in Collusion to Deny Due Process to Plaintiff, Anderson and the “Legally Related” lawsuits.

Anderson’s claims, include but are not limited to, allegations against Members of Prosecutorial State and Federal Agencies and the COURTS, who have been directly involved in alleged CRIMINAL ACTIVITY and are also DEFENDANTS in this RICO Lawsuit. Therefore, Plaintiff Demands that this Lawsuit be REMANDED back to the US District Court for REHEARING in conjunction with FULL INVESTIGATIONS OF ALL OF THE FOLLOWING PARTIES named by Anderson as being part of the CRIMINAL CONSPIRACY and those still unidentified but referred to accomplices [Footnote 70];

—–

[Footnote 70]

[70] http://exposecorruptessex.com/CourtInspectorGeneral.html

November 1, 2009 To: Inspector General for NY Unified Court System at ig@courts.state.ny.us

Re: Intolerable corruption and criminal conduct in our Appellate Court Discipline by Terence Finnan

and

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205

Tuesday, October 27, 2009 Letter to Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin United States District Judge Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312

Re: IVIEWIT LETTER TO US FED JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN RE CRIMINAL “WHISTLEBLOWER” ALLEGATIONS in Christine C. Anderson v. New York State et al. Docket 07cv09599 alleging Disciplinary Complaint Fixing by the “CLEANER” for US Attorneys, New York District Attorneys and ADA’s; Code of Conduct for US Judges Canon 3B(5), Protecting the People. Eliot I. Bernstein.

Both footnote references incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

—–

1. The Department of Justice – Office of the US Attorney General

2. The New York Attorney General Office

3. The District Attorney Office

4. The Assistant DA Office

5. Thomas Cahill, former Chief Counsel of the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Department

6. Sherry Cohen, Deputy Chief Counsel of the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Department

7. Naomi Goldstein, aka “The Cleaner,” (as defined by Anderson in Sworn Testimony in Federal Court) Deputy Chief Counsel of the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Department

8. David Spokony, Deputy Clerk - New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Department

9. Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Former Clerk of the New York Supreme Court and now CLERK of this COURT, Defendant in this Lawsuit and former Defendant in Anderson’s Whistleblower Lawsuit and now material witness for Anderson

10. Justice Angela M. Mazzarel of the Appellate Division, New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Department

11. “Favored Law Firms” as defined by Anderson in Sworn Testimony in Federal Court yet left unidentified

12. “Favored Lawyers”, as defined by Anderson in Sworn Testimony in Federal Court yet left unidentified

Anderson’s ALLEGATIONS OF FELONY MISCONDUCT by MEMBERS and representatives of these PUBLIC AGENCIES and the COURTS, whom are directly involved in Plaintiff’s RICO & ANTITRUST, constitute absolute cause to REMAND this Lawsuit back to the US District Court, to be IMMEDIATELY HEARD BY NON CONFLICTED PARTIES. Plaintiff also calls, as did Anderson, for the IMMEDIATE APPOINTMENT OF A FEDERAL MONITOR AS REQUIRED BY LAW, to oversight the day-to-day operations of the courts and those court actors named in this Lawsuit and the related lawsuits as accomplice to the crimes. Further, Orders to Halt the Lawsuit should accompany the REMANDING to the US District Court, until everyone currently involved in this Lawsuit is both DISQUALIFIED and INVESTIGATED for their part in Aiding & Abetting this MASSIVE FRAUD ON THE COURTS and STATE AND FEDERAL PUBLIC AGENCIES. Then, and only then, can the Lawsuit proceed and be heard in a CONFLICT FREE FORUM by CONFLICT FREE PUBLIC OFFICIALS AND COURT OFFICIALS, all who have signed Conflict Disclosure Forms prior to PROCEEDING, in other words, the creation of a FAIR & IMPARTIAL COURT OF LAW as GUARANTEED UNDER LAW. This COURT’S failure to provide such GUARANTEE OF A CONFLICT FREE COURT and further attempts to ILLEGALLY BURY this Lawsuit will result in FURTHER CRIMINAL OBSTRUCTION and other FELONY CHARGES.

V. REMOVE AND REPORT ALL OTHER CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICE RULES, VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL CANNONS, ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES AND STATE AND FEDERAL LAW, CURRENTLY IN PLACE IN THIS RICO LAWSUIT AND RELATED CASES, IN ORDER TO IMPART FAIR AND IMPARTIAL DUE PROCESS UNDER LAW

The Rehearings must be free from the start of ALL, Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons and State & Federal Law of which there are many more violations currently in play with ALL ATTORNEYS AT LAW involved in this RICO Lawsuit that are directly related to the New York Attorneys General conflicts. All must instantly cease and further be reported to the proper CRIMINAL authorities. Conflicts and violations of law that have infected and poisoned these hearings from the start, acting to, Obstruct Justice, Deny Due Process and perpetrate never ending FRAUD ON THE COURTS through Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, which without these VIOLATIONS this FRAUD ON THE COURT will now crumble. The only sane course of action forward in this Lawsuit, as unraveling the Web of Conflicts currently at play is now impossible and further as Anderson has left a mystery for discovery of who these “FAVORED LAW FIRMS AND LAWYERS” are, is to now DISQUALIFY and REPLACE ALL ATTORNEYS AT LAW currently acting in ANY Capacity in this Lawsuit. PRESCREENING ALL those ATTORNEYS AT LAW, JUDGES, REGULATORS and any other Public Official for conflict PRIOR to entering the Lawsuit going forward and REPRESENTING ANY PARTIES, which is required in both their legal capacities as acting as OFFICERS OF THIS COURT and ATTORNEYS AT LAW.

VI. DEMAND THAT ALL PARTIES TO THIS LAWSUIT GOING FORWARD, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO, COURT JUSTICES & OFFICIALS, ATTORNEYS AT LAW, PROSECUTORS, CLERKS, ETC. SIGN AFFIRMED CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURES, IDENTICAL TO THE ONE ATTACHED HEREIN, ACKNOWLEDGING PERSONAL AND PROFESSIONAL LIABILITIES FOR ANY VIOLATION, PRIOR TO, ANY FURTHER ACTION BY ANYONE IN THIS RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT.

Plaintiff is suing the New York State Supreme Courts, Members of the New York State Supreme Courts, Members of the New York State Bar Association, the New York State Bar Association and therefore ANY MEMBER of these organizations is conflicted from hearing or representing this Lawsuit without conflict. Therefore, the Lawsuit should be free of any lawyers registered or members of the New York Courts or any other Agency that is a Defendant in these matters, as again, this would be further ILLEGAL CONFLICTS and Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes that act to OBSTRUCT JUSTICE and ILLEGALLY DENY PLAINTIFF DUE PROCESS RIGHTS.

VII. DEMAND FOR JUSTICES OF THE SECOND CIRCUIT TO TURN THEMSELVES IN TO STATE AND FEDERAL CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES TO ANSWER TO FILED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST THEM AND SERVED UPON THEM

PLAINTIFF DEMANDS THIS COURT REPORT THESE FELONY STATE AND FEDERAL CRIMES, including the FRAUD ON THE COURT and FELONY CRIMINAL ACTS, to all proper CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES for IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION or face further Obstruction Charges by YOUR continued MISPRISION OF FELONY Offences and more. Justices and others named herein that are Members of the Court are obligated to turn themselves in for criminal investigation and prosecution regarding the Criminal Complaints filed against them.

VIII. ALLEGED CRIMES ONGOING BY P. STEPHEN LAMONT ET AL. BOTH KNOWN AND UNKNOWN AND FRAUD ON THIS COURT, THE US DISTRICT COURT AND NOW OTHER COURTS INCLUDING THE SUPREME COURT AND MORE.

P. Stephen Lamont has no legal standing or basis in this RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, as he failed to file individually and instead chose to file on Behalf of others, including Iviewit Shareholders. Where Lamont is not a licensed ATTORNEY AT LAW, as he failed to ever pass the Bar Exam, these acts are in Violation of Attorney Conduct Codes and Law, including fraudulently representing others and companies without ANY consent from the individuals or the Iviewit companies. This Court, the US District Court, the New York Attorney General and others have been formally notified of the continued crimes by Lamont’s ILLEGALLY ACTING AS AN ATTORNEY AT LAW IN THIS LAWSUIT for which he has no legal basis or standing in. Yet again, there is a failure of the courts and prosecutorial offices to follow law and ethics rules and report and/or investigate the felony crimes, further constituting FRAUD ON THE COURTS, MISPRISION OF FELONIES, AIDING AND ABETTING AND MORE.

The following URL’s regarding the CRIMINAL ACTIVITY of P. Stephen Lamont are incorporated entirely by reference herein,

June 18, 2009 Letter to New York Attorney General Andrew Cuomo and Steven Michael Cohen titled, “First Department Obstruction”

IX. PLAINTIFF SEEKS LEAVE TO AMEND THE AMENDED COMPLAINT TO ADD NEW DEFENDANTS AND NEW ALLEGED CRIMES NEWLY DISCOVERED

Plaintiff will be seeking leave to amend the Amended Complaint to add all of the following New Crimes discovered against the RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION:

1. War Crimes – The Coup/RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION has plotted Illegal Wars of Aggression based on Lies and Deceit of the American People in order to Profit from such Un-American, Un-Patriotic and Illegal Activities, including but not limited to, War Profiteering, Controlled Market Demolitions and Oil Price Fixing,

2. Crimes Against Humanity - The Coup/RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION in Illegally Waging Wars of Aggression based on Lies and Deceit of the American People have illegally DETAINED, DENIED JURISPRUDENCE and TORTURED tens of thousands of individuals in violation of State, Federal and International Law and Treatise, including but not limited to, the Geneva Conventions and Title 18 USC. The Coup/RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION in Illegally Waging Wars of Aggression based on Lies and Deceit of the American People have illegally MURDERED, MAIMED AND DISPLACED MILLIONS of individuals in Foreign Nations and the United States in violation of State, Federal and International Law and Treatise, including but not limited to, the Geneva Conventions and Title 18 USC. Further, tens of thousands of those MURDERED and MAIMED in these ILLEGAL WARS of AGGRESSION are the United States and Foreign Nations FALLEN SOLDIERS who have been fighting these ILLEGAL WARS.

3. Economic Terrorism – Already discussed and evidenced herein.

4. Treason and Sedition– Already discussed and evidenced herein.

X. RELIEF

No relief is requested from those currently handling this Lawsuit in violation of Law, other than to turn themselves in for the multiple felonies identified herein, including but not limited to, War and Economic Crimes and report all CRIMES you have knowledge of to the proper authorities.

From any new participants, the only relief requested first and prior to ANY other action is a signed Conflict of Interest Disclosure.

In parting, to all of those who have acted in an ILLEGAL legal capacity as part of the RICO Criminal Org, violating law and ethics in this DIRTY COURT as evidenced herein, desecrating the very words law and order, desecrating the country and all those who have died to give us our Liberty and Freedom, robbing, murdering and plundering hundreds of millions of PEOPLE worldwide through your WAR AND ECONOMIC CRIMES, beware, the gates of hell await you. As the 99%’ers see your crimes for what they are and that you have aided and abetted the criminals by failure to uphold the law and prosecute, they will demand Justice against you. When that Justice fails, as it has in this Lawsuit, you will next hear them march upon your dirty courts and prosecutorial offices. You will next hear the trumpet of the PEOPLE, chanting that they want back every red cent you have stolen from them with your criminal friends on WallStreet/GreedStreet/FraudSt​reet, pitchforks in hand, seeking Justice and recovery of the estimated 14-46 Trillion you have stolen from World Markets. Know as you hear their boots upon your steps that Plaintiff fears no pity for your souls will they have, stripping you and yours of all earthly possessions and then your life, hopefully after fair and impartial trials in clean courts but either way fine.

EXHIBIT 1 – CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE PARTIAL LIST OF KNOWN CONFLICTED PARTIES

· Proskauer Rose, LLP; Alan S. Jaffe - Chairman Of The Board - (”Jaffe”); Kenneth Rubenstein - (”Rubenstein”); Robert Kafin - Managing Partner - (”Kafin”); Christopher C. Wheeler - (”Wheeler”); Steven C. Krane - (”Krane”); Stephen R. Kaye - (”S. Kaye”) and in his estate with New York Supreme Court Chief Judge Judith Kaye (“J. Kaye”); Matthew Triggs - (”Triggs”); Christopher Pruzaski - (”Pruzaski”); Mara Lerner Robbins - (”Robbins”); Donald Thompson - (”Thompson”); Gayle Coleman; David George; George A. Pincus; Gregg Reed; Leon Gold - (”Gold”); Albert Gortz - (”Gortz”); Marcy Hahn-Saperstein; Kevin J. Healy - (”Healy”); Stuart Kapp; Ronald F. Storette; Chris Wolf; Jill Zammas; FULL LIST OF 601 liable Proskauer Partners; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Proskauer partner, affiliate, company, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Proskauer ROSE LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Proskauer related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· MELTZER, LIPPE, GOLDSTEIN, WOLF & SCHLISSEL, P.C.; Lewis Melzter - (”Meltzer”); Raymond Joao - (”Joao”); Frank Martinez - (”Martinez”); Kenneth Rubenstein - (”Rubenstein”); FULL LIST OF 34 Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C. liable Partners; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C. partner, affiliate, company, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C.; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· FOLEY & LARDNER LLP; Ralf Boer (”Boer”); Michael Grebe (“Grebe”); Christopher Kise (“Kise”); William J. Dick - (”Dick”); Steven C. Becker - (”Becker”); Douglas Boehm - (”Boehm”); Barry Grossman - (”Grossman”); Jim Clark - (”Clark”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Foley & Lardner partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Foley & Lardner; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Foley & Lardner related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP; Richard Schiffrin - (”Schiffrin”); Andrew Barroway - (”Barroway”); Krishna Narine - (”Narine”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP; Norman Zafman - (”Zafman”); Thomas Coester - (”Coester”); Farzad Ahmini - (”Ahmini”); George Hoover - (”Hoover”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP; Martyn W. Molyneaux - (”Molyneaux”); Michael Dockterman - (”Dockterman”); FULL LIST OF 198 Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP liable Partners; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Christopher & Weisberg, P.A.; Alan M. Weisberg - (”Weisberg”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Christopher & Weisberg, P.A. partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Christopher & Weisberg, P.A.; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Christopher & Weisberg, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· YAMAKAWA INTERNATIONAL PATENT OFFICE; Masaki Yamakawa - (”Yamakawa”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Yamakawa International Patent Office partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Yamakawa International Patent Office; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Yamakawa International Patent Office related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· GOLDSTEIN LEWIN & CO.; Donald J. Goldstein - (”Goldstein”); Gerald R. Lewin - (”Lewin”); Erika Lewin - (”E. Lewin”); Mark R. Gold; Paul Feuerberg; Salvatore Bochicchio; Marc H. List; David A. Katzman; Robert H. Garick; Robert C. Zeigen; Marc H. List; Lawrence A. Rosenblum; David A. Katzman; Brad N. Mciver; Robert Cini; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Goldstein & Lewin Co. partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Goldstein & Lewin Co.; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Goldstein & Lewin Co. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· INTEL Corporation;

· Silicon Graphics Inc.;

· Lockheed Martin Corporation;

· Real 3D, Inc. (SILICON GRAPHICS, INC., LOCKHEED MARTIN & INTEL) & RYJO; Gerald Stanley - (”Stanley”); Ryan Huisman - (”Huisman”); RYJO - (”RYJO”); Tim Connolly - (”Connolly”); Steve Cochran; David Bolton; Rosalie Bibona - (”Bibona”); Connie Martin; Richard Gentner; Steven A. Behrens; Matt Johannsen; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO; Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO related or affiliated entities, and any successor companies both individually and professionally;

· Tiedemann Investment Group; Bruce T. Prolow (”Prolow”); Carl Tiedemann (”C. Tiedemann”); Andrew Philip Chesler; Craig L. Smith; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Tiedemann Investment Group partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Tiedemann Investment Group and any other Tiedemann Investment Group related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners; Stephen J. Warner - (”Warner”); Rene P. Eichenberger - (”Eichenberger”); H. Hickman Hank Powell - (”Powell”); Maurice Buchsbaum - (”Buchsbaum”); Eric Chen - (”Chen”); Avi Hersh; Matthew Shaw - (”Shaw”); Bruce W. Shewmaker - (”Shewmaker”); Ravi M. Ugale - (”Ugale”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners and any other Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· BROAD & CASSEL; James J. Wheeler - (”J. Wheeler”); Kelly Overstreet Johnson - (”Johnson”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Broad & Cassell partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Broad & Cassell and any other Broad & Cassell related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· FORMER IVIEWIT MANAttorney GeneralEMENT & BOARD; Brian G. Utley/Proskauer Referred Management - (”Utley”); Raymond Hersh - (”Hersh”)/; Michael Reale - (”Reale”)/Proskauer Referred Management; Rubenstein/Proskauer Rose Shareholder in Iviewit - Advisory Board; Wheeler/Proskauer Rose Shareholder in Iviewit - Advisory Board; Dick/Foley & Lardner - Advisory Board, Boehm/Foley & Lardner - Advisory Board; Becker/Foley & Lardner; Advisory Board; Joao/Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel - Advisory Board; Kane/Goldman Sachs - Board Director; Lewin/Goldstein Lewin - Board Director; Ross Miller, Esq. (“Miller”), Prolow/Tiedemann Prolow II - Board Director; Powell/Crossbow Ventures/Proskauer Referred Investor - Board Director; Maurice Buchsbaum - Board Director; Stephen Warner - Board Director; Simon L. Bernstein – Board Director (“S. Bernstein”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Former Iviewit Management & Board partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Former Iviewit Management & Board and any other Former Iviewit Management & Board related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT - WEST PALM BEACH FLORIDA; Judge Jorge LABARGA - (”Labarga”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT - WEST PALM BEACH FLORIDA staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time. Hereinafter, collectively referred to as (”15C”);

· THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE; Thomas Cahill - (”Cahill”); Joseph Wigley - (”Wigley”); Steven Krane, any other John Doe (”John Doe”) of THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time;

· THE FLORIDA BAR; Lorraine Christine Hoffman - (”Hoffman”); Eric Turner - (”Turner”); Kenneth Marvin - (”Marvin”); Anthony Boggs - (”Boggs”); Joy A. Bartmon - (”Bartmon”); Kelly Overstreet Johnson - (”Johnson”); Jerald Beer - (”Beer”); Matthew Triggs; Christopher or James Wheeler; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) The Florida Bar staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time;

· MPEGLA, LLC. – Kenneth Rubenstein, Patent Evaluator; Licensors and Licensees, please visit www.mpegla.com for a complete list; Columbia University; Fujitsu Limited; General Instrument Corp; Lucent Technologies Inc.; Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.; Mitsubishi Electric Corp.; Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips); Scientific Atlanta, Inc.; Sony Corp. (Sony); EXTENDED LIST OF MPEGLA LICENSEES AND LICENSORS; any other John Doe MPEGLA, LLC. Partner, Associate, Engineer, Of Counsel or Employee; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) MPEGLA, LLC partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to MPEGLA, LLC and any other MPEGLA, LLC related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· DVD6C LICENSING GROUP - Licensors and Licensees, please visit www.mpegla.com for a complete list; Toshiba Corporation; Hitachi, Ltd.; Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd.; Mitsubishi Electric Corporation; Time Warner Inc.; Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd.; EXTENDED DVD6C DEFENDANTS; any other John Doe DVD6C LICENSING GROUP Partner, Associate, Engineer, Of Counsel or Employee; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) DVD6C LICENSING GROUP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to DVD6C LICENSING GROUP and any other DVD6C LICENSING GROUP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Harrison Goodard Foote incorporating Brewer & Son; Martyn Molyneaux, Esq. (“Molyneaux”); Any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Harrison Goodard Foote (incorporating Brewer & Son) partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Harrison Goodard Goote incorporating Brewer & Son and any other related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman of the Grievance Committee of the Second Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee;

· James E. Peltzer, Clerk of the Court of the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Judicial Department; Diana Kearse, Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee of the Second Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee;

· Houston & Shahady, P.A., any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Houston & Shahady, P.A., affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Houston & Shahady, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Furr & Cohen, P.A. any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Furr & Cohen, P.A., affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Furr & Cohen, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Jeffrey Friedstein (“Friedstein”); Sheldon Friedstein (S. Friedstein”), Donald G. Kane (“Kane”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and any other related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· David B. Simon, Esq. (“D. Simon”);

· Sachs Saxs & Klein, PA any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Sachs Saxs & Klein, PA, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Sachs Saxs & Klein, PA related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Huizenga Holdings Incorporated any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Huizenga Holdings Incorporated affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Huizenga Holdings Incorporated related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Davis Polk & Wardell;

· Ropes & Gray LLP;

· Sullivan & Cromwell LLP;

· Eliot I. Bernstein, (“Bernstein”) a resident of the State of California, and former President (Acting) of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates and subsidiaries and the founder of Iviewit and principal inventor of its technology;

· P. Stephen Lamont, (“Lamont”) a resident of the State of New York, and former Chief Executive Officer (Acting) of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. and all of its affiliates and subsidiaries;

· SKULL AND BONES; The Russell Trust Co.; Yale Law School;

· Council on Foreign Relations;

· The Bilderberg Group;

· The Federalist Society;

· The Bradley Foundation;

Please include in the COI check the defendants and any other parties in the legally related cases in New York District Court Southern District of New York to Docket No 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT, including but not limited to;

D. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 08-4873-cv

E. (07cv11196) Bernstein et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT Defendants, in addition to those already listed herein, include but are not limited to;

· STATE OF NEW YORK;

· THE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM;

· STEVEN C. KRANE in his official and individual Capacities for the New York State Bar Association and the Appellate Division First Department Departmental disciplinary Committee, and, his professional and individual capacities as a Proskauer partner;

· ESTATE OF STEPHEN KAYE, in his professional and individual capacities;

· MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer;

· JON A. BAUMGARTEN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· SCOTT P. COOPER, in his professional and individual capacities;

· BRENDAN J. O’ROURKE, in his professional and individual capacities;

· LAWRENCE I. WEINSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· WILLIAM M. HART, in his professional and individual capacities;

· DARYN A. GROSSMAN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· JOSEPH A. CAPRARO JR., in his professional and individual capacities;

· JAMES H. SHALEK; in his professional and individual capacities;

· GREGORY MASHBERG, in his professional and individual capacities;

· JOANNA SMITH, in her professional and individual capacities;

· TODD C. NORBITZ, in his professional and individual capacities;

· ANNE SEKEL, in his professional and individual capacities;

· JIM CLARK, in his professional and individual capacities;

· STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR, FLORIDA;

· FLORIDA SUPREME COURT;

· HON. CHARLES T. WELLS, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. HARRY LEE ANSTEAD, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. R. FRED LEWIS, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. PEGGY A. QUINCE, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. KENNETH B. BELL, in his official and individual capacities;

· THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual capacities;

· DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and individual capacities;

· DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA;

· CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA.;

· ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and individual capacities;

· ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual capacities;

· PAUL CURRAN in his official and individual capacities;

· MARTIN R. GOLD in his official and individual capacities;

· SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT;

· CATHERINE O’HAttorney GeneralEN WOLFE in her official and individual capacities;

· HON. ANGELA M. MAZZARELLI in her official and individual capacities;

· HON. RICHARD T. ANDRIAS in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. DAVID B. SAXE in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. DAVID FRIEDMAN in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. LUIZ A. GONZALES in his official and individual capacities;

· SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT;

· SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE;

· HON. A. GAIL PRUDENTI in her official and individual capacities;

· HON. JUDITH S. KAYE in her official and individual capacities;

· STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION;

· ANTHONY CARTUSCIELLO in his official and individual capacities;

· LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;

· OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;

· ELIOT SPITZER in his official and individual capacities, as both former Attorney General for the State of New York, and, as former Governor of the State of New York;

· ANDREW CUOMO in his official and individual capacities, as both former Attorney General for the State of New York, and, as current Governor of the State of New York;

· Steven M. Cohen in his official and individual capacities, as both former Chief of Staff fo Attorney General Andrew Cuomo for the State of New York, and, as current Secretary to the Governor of the State of New York;

· Emily Cole, in her official and individual capacities, as an employee of Steven M. Cohen for the Governor Cuomo of the State of New York;

· COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA;

· VIRGINIA STATE BAR;

· ANDREW H. GOODMAN in his official and individual capacities;

· NOEL SENGEL in her official and individual capacities;

· MARY W. MARTELINO in her official and individual capacities;

· LIZBETH L. MILLER, in her official and individual capacities;

· MPEGLA LLC; LAWRENCE HORN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· INTEL CORP.; LARRY PALLEY, in his professional and individual capacities;

· SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.;

· LOCKHEED MARTIN Corp;

· EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE;

· ALAIN POMPIDOU in his official and individual capacities;

· WIM VAN DER EIJK in his official and individual capacities;

· LISE DYBDAHL in her official and personal capacities;

· DIGITAL INTERACTIVE STREAMS, INC.;

· ROYAL O’BRIEN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED, WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional and individual capacities;

· WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional and individual capacities;

· BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities;

· ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities;

· JOHNNIE E. FRAZIER in his official and individual capacities;

· IVIEWIT, INC., a Florida corporation;

· IVIEWIT, INC., a Delaware corporation;

· IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Uview.com, Inc.);

· UVIEW.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation;

· IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Iviewit Holdings, Inc.);

· IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida corporation;

· IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Florida corporation;

· I.C., INC., a Florida corporation;

· IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation;

· IVIEWIT.COM LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;

· IVIEWIT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;

· IVIEWIT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation;

· IBM CORPORATION;

To be added New Defendants in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit through amendment or in any anticipated future litigations and criminal filings:

o Andrew Cuomo, in his official and individual capacities,

o Steven M. Cohen, in his official and individual capacities,

o Emily Cole, in her official and individual capacities,

o Justice Richard C. Wesley in his official and individual capacities,

o Justice Peter W. Hall in his official and individual capacities,

o Justice Debra Ann Livingston in her official and individual capacities,

o Justice Ralph K. Winter in his official and individual capacities,

o P. Stephen Lamont, (Questions about Lamont’s filings on behalf of others and more filed with criminal authorities and this Court notified of the alleged fraudulent activities of Lamont)

o Alan Friedberg, in his official and individual capacities,

o Roy Reardon, in his official and individual capacities,

o Martin Glenn, in his official and individual capacities,

o Warner Bros. Entertainment, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

o Time Warner Communications, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

o AOL Inc., (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

o Ropes & Gray,

o Stanford Financial Group,

o Bernard L. Madoff et al.

o Marc S. Dreier, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

o Sony Corporation, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

o Ernst & Young, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

o Arthur Andersen, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

o Enron, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

F. Other Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY Related to Christine C. Anderson

o 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT;

o 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.;

o 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.;

o 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.;

o 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.;

o 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.;

o 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.;

o 08cv04053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.;

o 08cv04438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.

o 08cv06368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York

EXHIBIT 2 - Tampering with Pacer Court Records

January 05, 2010 Order Signed by, Franklin Perez, may be part of a much larger FRAUD on the COURTS being committed in the US Second Circuit with the aid of Members of this Court, as revealed in a Lawsuit filed represented by Attorney Ruth M. Pollack, Esquire, titled “In The Supreme Court of the United States - KEVIN G. CHESNEY and LORRAINE CHESNEY, Petitioners v. VALLEY STREAM UNION FREE SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 24, et al., Respondents” filed with the US Supreme Court and found online at

http://www.scribd.com/doc/58592324/Ruth-Pollack-SCOTUS-Petition-for-Certiorari-on-2nd-Circuit-Court-Fraud?secret_password=&autodown=pdf

and the filed case at the US Supreme Court and the attached URL are hereby incorporated by reference in ENTIRETY herein.

All arguments contained within the Chesney’s Lawsuit regarding Fraudulent Court Orders pertaining to Franklin Perez and Defendant Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, are hereby further included in this Motion as further PRIMA FACIE evidence of THIS COURT’S CONTINUED & ONGOING OBSTRUCTIONS. Please print this URL’s document and the SUPREME COURT CASE DOCKET and attach as EXHIBIT physically to this Motion, due to the ongoing claims of docket fraud and document fraud as alleged in the Chesney/Pollack case, the Anderson Lawsuit and the Legally Related Lawsuits to Anderson, that may be affecting all these cases and tens of thousands of other US Civil and Criminal Cases. From the Online Filing, quote,

“e) immediate stay of appeal pending criminal investigation into docket fraud, file destruction and conference with judges, and f) stay of appeal pending “resolution of [Petitioners’] anticipated writs of certiorari, mandamus to the United States Supreme Court, based on impossibility of briefing within appeal due to destroyed record and fraudulent Order signed by Operation’s Analyst Franklin Perez for RCW [Justice Richard C. Wesley, Esq.],” and g) a default judgment due to proven tampering, destruction and fake Orders. App. 69-92 This case is unique and shocks the conscience for its total lack of due process under FED. R. CIV. P. at the trial court level and under FED. R. APP. P. at the appellate level. The Second Circuit failed to afford Petitioners with due process in multiple ways in that there were:

1) no docketed, annotated, certified Record on Appeal; App. 106-120

2) no certified transcripts of district court proceedings; App. 106-120 17

3) no original lower court documents as stated on the Second Circuit General Docket as published on PACER;

4) no CAMP conference; App. 106-120

5) no briefing schedule or pre-briefing conference; App. 106-120

6) no oral arguments, even though oral argument was formally requested seven (7) times; App. 106-120

7) no panel of judges or single judge, at least twelve (12) different judges’ names appeared without their knowledge on fake Orders and on the fake General Docket, but no judge or panel of judges ever heard the case or met with the parties; App. 106-120

8 ) no appearance of this case or any of its seven (7) T-1080 motions by Petitioners appeared on any approved calendars maintained by the Clerk of the Court; App. 93-105

9) no judge’s signature on any documents or purported orders of the Court;

10) no valid orders were issued; in fact, all motions by Petitioners were falsely claimed to have been “sua sponte” denied by the Court, even though none were ever calendared or seen by a judge or a panel of judges as required by FED. R. APP. P; App. 10 a fake “Order” dated, filed by stamp of January 07, 2010 is falsely docketed on the General Docket as 18 “entered” on January 8, 2010, signed by “Operations Analyst Franklin Perez for Judge Richard C. Wesley (RCW by FP).”

App. 7-9 The fake order, miss-mailed to an incorrect address late and post marked four (4) days later to Petitioners’ legal counsel Pollack, contains three sitting judges’ names all in contravention of FED. R. APP. P. § 25(a)(2)(B)(ii). Hence, there never was a briefing “Order” or a “certified” and “mandated” “Order” dismissing (disposing of) this phantom appeal. App. 1-4

11) No judges present on any calendars. According to the Court’s Approved Calendar for the Week of January 4 through January 8, 2010 in the Ceremonial Courtroom (9th Floor), none of the named judges on the fake “order” were “Present” on the date or week indicated. The instant case did not appear on this week’s “approved” calendar. None of the fake orders in the instant case appeared on any of the Court’s corresponding calendars. App. 93-105 Mr. Perez also appears in other cases as “Deputy Clerk Frank Perez.” cf. App. 7-9

12) Staff attorneys with no authority to do so, signed fake Orders and issued them late under unknowing judges’ names and failed to docket the fake Orders.

13) No opposition or lawful participation by pro se Respondent – Respondent school 19 district from April 29, 2009 to date – the duration of the case in the Circuit – resulting in a total default by the school district, a fact never acknowledged by the District Court, Circuit Court or Clerk;

14) Circuit Clerk abducted Petitioners’ case in that she acted as attorney and counsel on behalf of the defaulting school district in violation of FED. R. APP. P. §§ 45 and 45.1. [Clerk’s Duties]

15) Purported Order dated May 5, 2010 that “disposed” of this phantom “appeal” was not seen by any judge or panel of judges, not calendared or entered onto the Court docket, but is purportedly “mandated” on June 10, 2010 and not “docketed” until June 24, 2010. This fake Order was not mandated or sent to and docketed by the district court. App. 1-4, 121

16) No true case manager on the case. The docket reflects at least twelve (12) different “case managers” from several different departments of the Court. App. 106-120

EXHIBIT 3 – CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS

1

2

3

EXHIBIT 4 – ETHICS COMPLAINTS

1

2

3

————

CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM

dante

Lasciate ogne speranza, voi ch’intrate
whom fail to heed this form.

[1] il Sommo Poeta ~ Durante degli Alighieri, “Divina Commedia” 1308-1321 Canto III

BY YOU IN THESE MATTERS

Please accept and return signed, the following Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form (COI) before continuing further with adjudication, review or investigation of the attached MOTION to the United States Second Circuit Court, titled,

Emergency Motion:

After 10 Days, if this form has not been signed or subsequently turned over to a NON CONFLICTED PARTY, your Failure to comply may result in criminal and civil charges FILED against you FOR AIDING AND ABETTING A RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION, FEDERAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and more, AS NOTED HEREIN.

The Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form is designed to ensure that the review and any determination from such review of the enclosed materials shouldnot be biased by any conflicting financial interest or any other conflicting interest by those reviewers responsible for the handling of this confidential information. Whereby any conflict with any of the main alleged perpetrators of the alleged crimes referenced in these matters herein, or any other perpetrators not known at this time, must be fully disclosed in writing and returned by anyone reviewing these matters prior to making ANY determination.

Disclosure forms with “Yes” answers, by any party, to any of the following questions, are demanded not to open the remainder of the documents or opine in any manner, until the signed COI is reviewed and approved by the Iviewit companies and Eliot I. Bernstein. If you feel that a Conflict of Interest exists that cannot be eliminated through conflict resolution with the Iviewit Companies or Eliot Bernstein, instantly forward the matters to the next available reviewer that is free of conflict that can sign and complete the requisite disclosure. Please identify conflicts that you have, in writing, upon terminating your involvement in the matters to the address listed at the end of this disclosure form for Iviewit companies or Eliot I. Bernstein. As many of these alleged perpetrators are large law firms, lawyers, members of various state and federal courts, officers of federal, state and local law enforcement and regulatory agencies, careful review and disclosure of any conflict with those named herein is pertinent in your continued handling of these matters objectively.

These matters already involve claims of, including but not limited to, Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Public Offices, Whitewashing of Official Complaints in the Supreme Courts of New York, Florida, Virginia and elsewhere, Threatening a Federal Witness in a “legally related” Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit, Document Destruction and Alteration, Obstructions of Justice, RICO, ATTEMPTED MURDER and much more. The need for prescreening for conflict is essential to the administration of due process in these matters and necessary to avoid charges of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and more, against you. US Federal District Court Judge, Shira A. Scheindlin, legally related the matters to a New York Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower Lawsuit of Christine C. Anderson, Esq. who alleges similar claims of public office corruption against Supreme Court of New York Officials, US Attorneys, NY District Attorneys and Assistant District Attorneys. Therefore, this Conflict Check is a formal request for full disclosure of any conflict on your part, such request conforming with all applicable state and federal laws, public office rules and regulations, attorney conduct codes and judicial canons or other international law and treatises requiring disclosure of conflicts and disqualification from these matters where conflict precludes involvement.

Failure to comply with all applicable conflict disclosure rules, public office rules and regulations, and, state, federal and international laws, prior to continued action on your part, shall constitute cause for the filing of criminal and civil complaints against you for any decisions or actions you make prior to a signed Conflict Of Interest Disclosure Form. Charges will be filed against you for failure to comply. Complaints will be filed with all appropriate authorities, including but not limited to, the appropriate Federal, State, Local and International Law Enforcement Agencies, Public Integrity Officials, Judicial Conduct Officials, State and Federal Bar Associations, Disciplinary Departments and any/all other appropriate agencies.

I. Do you, your spouse and your dependents, in the aggregate, have any direct or indirect relations, relationships or interest(s) in any entity, or any of the parties listed in EXHIBIT 1 of this document, or any of the named Defendants in these matters contained at the URL,

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Appendix%20A/index.htm#proskauer ?

Please review the online index in entirety prior to answering, as there are several thousand persons and entities.

_____NO ____YES

Please describe in detail any relations, relationships, interests and conflicts, on a separate and attached sheet, fully disclosing all information. If the answer is Yes, please describe the relations, relationships, interests and conflicts, and, affirm whether such conflicts or interests present a conflict of interest that precludes fair review of the matters contained herein without undue bias or prejudice of any kind.

II. Do you, your spouse and your dependents, in the aggregate, have any direct or indirect relations, relationships or interest(s), in any entity, or any direct or indirect relations, relationships or interest(s), to ANY other known, or unknown person, or known or unknown entity, not named herein, which will cause your review of the materials you are charged with investigating to be biased by any conflicting past, present, or future financial interest(s) or any other interest(s)?

_____NO ____YES

Please describe in detail any relations, relationships, interests and conflicts, on a separate and attached sheet, fully disclosing all information. If the answer is Yes, please describe the relations, relationships and interests, and, affirm whether such conflicts or interests present a conflict of interest that precludes fair review of the matters contained herein without undue bias or prejudice of any kind.

III. Do you, your spouse, and your dependents, in the aggregate, receive salary or other remuneration or financial considerations from any person or entity related in any way to the parties defined in Question I, including but not limited to, campaign contributions whether direct, “in kind” or of any type at all?

_____NO ____YES

Please describe in detail any interests or conflicts, on a separate and attached sheet, fully disclosing all information regarding the conflicts or considerations. If the answer is Yes, please describe the relations, relationships and / or interests, and, affirm whether such conflicts or interests present a conflict of interest that precludes fair review of the matters contained herein without undue bias or prejudice of any kind.

IV. Have you, your spouse, and your dependents, in the aggregate, had any prior communication(s), including but not limited to, phone, facsimile, e-mail, mail, verbal, etc., with any person related to the proceedings of Iviewit, Eliot Ivan Bernstein or the related matters in anyway and parties in Question I?

_____NO _____YES

Please describe in detail any identified communication(s) on a separate and attached sheet fully disclosing all information regarding the communication(s). If the answer is Yes, please describe the communication(s) in detail, including but not limited to, who was present, what type of communication, the date and time, length, what was discussed, please affirm whether such communication(s) present a conflict of interest in fairly reviewing the matters herein without undue bias or prejudice of any kind.

V. I have run a thorough and exhaustive Conflict of Interest check, conforming to any/all, state, federal and local laws, public office rules and regulations, and, any professional association rules and regulations, regarding disclosure of any/all conflicts. I have verified that my spouse, my dependents, and I, in the aggregate, have no conflicts with any parties or entities to the matters referenced herein. I understand that any undisclosed conflicts, relations, relationships and interests, will result in criminal and civil charges filed against me both personally and professionally.

_____NO ____YES

VI. I have notified all parties with any liabilities regarding my continued actions in these matters, including state agencies, shareholders, bondholders, auditors and insurance concerns or any other person with liability that may result from my actions in these matters as required by any laws, regulations and public office rules I am bound by.

_____NO ____YES

Relevant Sections of Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conduct Codes and Law

Conflict of interest indicates a situation where a private interest may influence a public decision. Conflict of Interest Laws are Laws and designed to prevent Conflicts of Interest that deny fair and impartial due process and procedure thereby Obstructing Justice in State and Federal, Civil and Criminal Proceedings. These Laws may contain provisions related to financial or asset disclosure, exploitation of one’s official position and privileges, improper relationships, regulation of campaign practices, etc. The Relevant Sections of Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law listed herein are merely a benchmark guide and other state, federal and international laws, rules and regulations may be applicable to your particular circumstances in reviewing or acting in these matters. For a more complete list of applicable sections of law relating to these matters, please visit the IVIEWIT URL , fully incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

New York State Consolidated Laws Penal

ARTICLE 200 BRIBERY INVOLVING PUBLIC SERVANTS AND RELATED OFFENSES

S 200.03 Bribery in the second degree S 200.04 Bribery in the first degree S 200.05 Bribery; defense S 200.10 Bribe receiving in the third degree S 200.11 Bribe receiving in the second degree S 200.12 Bribe receiving in the first degree S 200.15 Bribe receiving; no defense S 200.20 Rewarding official misconduct in the second degree S 200.22 Rewarding official misconduct in the first degree S 200.25 Receiving reward for official misconduct in the second degree S 200.27 Receiving reward for official misconduct in the first degree S 200.30 Giving unlawful gratuities S 200.35 Receiving unlawful gratuities S 200.40 Bribe giving and bribe receiving for public office; definition of term S 200.45 Bribe giving for public office S 200.50 Bribe receiving for public office

ARTICLE 175 OFFENSES INVOLVING FALSE WRITTEN STATEMENTS S 175.05 Falsifying business records in the second degree. S 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree. S 175.15 Falsifying business records; defense S 175.20 Tampering with public records in the second degree S 175.25 Tampering with public records in the first degree S 175.30 Offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree S 175.35 Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree

NY Constitution ARTICLE XIII Public Officers

Public Officers - Public Officers ARTICLE 1

ARTICLE 2 Appointment and Qualification of Public Officers - ARTICLE 15 ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS

S 468-b. Clients` security fund of the state of New York S 476-a. Action for unlawful practice of the law S 476-b. Injunction to restrain defendant from unlawful practice of the law S 476-c. Investigation by the attorney-general S 487. Misconduct by attorneys S 488. Buying demands on which to bring an action.

Public Officers Law SEC 73 Restrictions on the Activities Of Current and Former State Officers and Employees

Public Officers Law SEC 74 Code of Ethics

Conflicts of Interest Law, found in Chapter 68 of the New York City Charter, the City’s Financial Disclosure Law, set forth in section 12-110 of the New York City Administrative Code, and the Lobbyist Gift Law, found in sections 3-224 through 3-228 of the Administrative Code.

TITLE 18 FEDERAL CODE & OTHER APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAW

Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. Misprision of felony. Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

A federal judge, or any other government official, is required as part of the judge’s mandatory administrative duties, to receive any offer of information of a federal crime. If that judge blocks such report, that block is a felony under related obstruction of justice statutes, and constitutes a serious offense.

Upon receiving such information, the judge is then required to make it known to a government law enforcement body that is not themselves involved in the federal crime.

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.

This federal statute permits any citizen to file a lawsuit in the federal courts to obtain a court order requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful acts. This statute is Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361.

FRAUD on the COURT

In the United States, when an officer of the court is found to have fraudulently presented facts to court so that the court is impaired in the impartial performance of its legal task, the act, known as “fraud upon the court”, is a crime deemed so severe and fundamentally opposed to the operation of justice that it is not subject to any statute of limitation.

Officers of the court include: Lawyers, Judges, Referees, and those appointed; Guardian Ad Litem, Parenting Time Expeditors, Mediators, Rule 114 Neutrals, Evaluators, Administrators, special appointees, and any others whose influence are part of the judicial mechanism.

“Fraud upon the court” has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to “embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication”. Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, ¶ 60.23

In Bulloch v. United States, 763 F.2d 1115, 1121 (10th Cir. 1985), the court stated “Fraud upon the court is fraud which is directed to the judicial machinery itself and is not fraud between the parties or fraudulent documents, false statements or perjury. … It is where the court or a member is corrupted or influenced or influence is attempted or where the judge has not performed his judicial function — thus where the impartial functions of the court have been directly corrupted.” What effect does an act of “fraud upon the court” have upon the court proceeding? “Fraud upon the court” makes void the orders and judgments of that court.

——————————————————————————–

TITLE 18 PART I CH 11

Sec. 201. Bribery of public officials and witnesses Sec. 225. - Continuing financial crimes enterprise

BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Sec. 205. - Activities of officers and employees in claims against and other matters affecting the Government Sec. 208. - Acts affecting a personal financial interest Sec. 210. - Offer to procure appointive public office Sec. 225. - Continuing financial crimes enterprise

TITLE 18 PART I CH 79 Sec 1623 - False declarations before grand jury or court

Sec 654 - Officer or employee of United States converting property of another

TITLE 18 PART I CH 73 Sec 1511 - Obstruction of State or local law enforcement

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 Sec 1961 RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT Organizations (”RICO”)

Section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), Section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations) Section 1511 (relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement), Section 1952 (relating to racketeering), Section 1957 (relating to engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity),

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 SEC 1962 (A) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 SEC 1962 (B) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 SEC 1962 (C) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 19 SEC 1962 (d) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 19 CONSPIRACY Sec 371 CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT OFFENSE OR TO DEFRAUD UNITED STATES

TITLE 18 PART I CH 95 RACKETEERING SEC 1957 Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity

TITLE 18 PART I CH 47 Sec 1031 - Major fraud against the United States

Judicial Cannons

What causes the “Disqualification of Judges?”

Federal law requires the automatic disqualification of a Federal judge under certain circumstances.

In 1994, the U.S. Supreme Court held that “Disqualification is required if an objective observer would entertain reasonable questions about the judge’s impartiality. If a judge’s attitude or state of mind leads a detached observer to conclude that a fair and impartial hearing is unlikely, the judge must be disqualified.” [Emphasis added]. Liteky v. U.S., 114 S.Ct. 1147, 1162 (1994).

Courts have repeatedly held that positive proof of the partiality of a judge is not a requirement, only the appearance of partiality. Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp., 486 U.S. 847, 108 S.Ct. 2194 (1988) (what matters is not the reality of bias or prejudice but its appearance); United States v. Balistrieri, 779 F.2d 1191 (7th Cir. 1985) (Section 455(a) “is directed against the appearance of partiality, whether or not the judge is actually biased.”) (”Section 455(a) of the Judicial Code, 28 U.S.C. §455(a), is not intended to protect litigants from actual bias in their judge but rather to promote public confidence in the impartiality of the judicial process.”).

That Court also stated that Section 455(a) “requires a judge to recuse himself in any proceeding in which her impartiality might reasonably be questioned.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989). In Pfizer Inc. v. Lord, 456 F.2d 532 (8th Cir. 1972), the Court stated that “It is important that the litigant not only actually receive justice, but that he believes that he has received justice.”

The Supreme Court has ruled and has reaffirmed the principle that “justice must satisfy the appearance of justice”, Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S.Ct. 1038 (1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14, 75 S.Ct. 11, 13 (1954). A judge receiving a bribe from an interested party over which he is presiding, does not give the appearance of justice.

“Recusal under Section 455 is self-executing; a party need not file affidavits in support of recusal and the judge is obligated to recuse herself sua sponte under the stated circumstances.” Taylor v. O’Grady, 888 F.2d 1189 (7th Cir. 1989).

Further, the judge has a legal duty to disqualify himself even if there is no motion asking for his disqualification. The Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals further stated that “We think that this language [455(a)] imposes a duty on the judge to act sua sponte, even if no motion or affidavit is filed.” Balistrieri, at 1202.

Judges do not have discretion not to disqualify themselves. By law, they are bound to follow the law. Should a judge not disqualify himself as required by law, then the judge has given another example of his “appearance of partiality” which, possibly, further disqualifies the judge. Should another judge not accept the disqualification of the judge, then the second judge has evidenced an “appearance of partiality” and has possibly disqualified himself/herself. None of the orders issued by any judge who has been disqualified by law would appear to be valid. It would appear that they are void as a matter of law, and are of no legal force or effect.

Should a judge not disqualify himself, then the judge is violation of the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution. United States v. Sciuto, 521 F.2d 842, 845 (7th Cir. 1996) (”The right to a tribunal free from bias or prejudice is based, not on section 144, but on the Due Process Clause.”).

Should a judge issue any order after he has been disqualified by law, and if the party has been denied of any of his / her property, then the judge may have been engaged in the Federal Crime of “interference with interstate commerce”. The judge has acted in the judge’s personal capacity and not in the judge’s judicial capacity. It has been said that this judge, acting in this manner, has no more lawful authority than someone’s next-door neighbor (provided that he is not a judge). However some judges may not follow the law.

If you were a non-represented litigant, and should the court not follow the law as to non-represented litigants, then the judge has expressed an “appearance of partiality” and, under the law, it would seem that he/she has disqualified him/herself.

However, since not all judges keep up to date in the law, and since not all judges follow the law, it is possible that a judge may not know the ruling of the U.S. Supreme Court and the other courts on this subject. Notice that it states “disqualification is required” and that a judge “must be disqualified” under certain circumstances.

The Supreme Court has also held that if a judge wars against the Constitution, or if he acts without jurisdiction, he has engaged in treason to the Constitution. If a judge acts after he has been automatically disqualified by law, then he is acting without jurisdiction, and that suggest that he is then engaging in criminal acts of treason, and may be engaged in extortion and the interference with interstate commerce.

Courts have repeatedly ruled that judges have no immunity for their criminal acts. Since both treason and the interference with interstate commerce are criminal acts, no judge has immunity to engage in such acts.

Canon 1. A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary

[1.1] Deference to the judgments and rulings of courts depends upon public confidence in the integrity and independence of judges. The integrity and independence of judges depends in turn upon their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they must comply with the law, including the provisions of this Code. Public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this Code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government under law.

Canon 2. A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities

(A) A judge shall respect and comply with the law and shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

[2.2][2A] The prohibition against behaving with impropriety or the appearance of impropriety applies to both the professional and personal conduct of a judge. Because it is not practicable to list all prohibited acts, the proscription is necessarily cast in general terms that extend to conduct by judges that is harmful although not specifically mentioned in the Code.Actual improprieties under this standard include violations of law, court rules or other specific provisions of this Code. The test for appearance of impropriety is whether the conduct would create in reasonable minds a perception that the judge’s ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with integrity, impartiality and competence is impaired.

Canon 3. A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Impartially and Diligently

(B) Adjudicative responsibilities.

(l) A judge shall be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it. A judge shall not be swayed by partisan interests, public clamor or fear of criticism.

(2) A judge shall require order and decorum in proceedings before the judge.

(D) Disciplinary responsibilities.

(1) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a substantial violation of this Part shall take appropriate action.

(2) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a substantial violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility shall take appropriate action.

(3) Acts of a judge in the discharge of disciplinary responsibilities are part of a judge’s judicial duties.

(E) Disqualification.

(1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned

[3.11][3B(6)(e)] A judge may delegate the responsibilities of the judge under Canon 3B(6) to a member of the judge’s staff. A judge must make reasonable efforts, including the provision of appropriate supervision, to ensure that Section 3B(6) is not violated through law clerks or other personnel on the judge’s staff. This provision does not prohibit the judge or the judge’s law clerk from informing all parties individually of scheduling or administrative decisions.

[3.21][3E(1)] Under this rule, a judge is disqualified whenever the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, regardless whether any of the specific rules in Section 3E(1) apply. For example, if a judge were in the process of negotiating for employment with a law firm, the judge would be disqualified from any matters in which that firm appeared, unless the disqualification was waived by the parties after disclosure by the judge.

[3.22][3E(1)] A judge should disclose on the record information that the judge believes the parties or their lawyers might consider relevant to the question of disqualification, even if the judge believes there is no real basis for disqualification.

Canon 4. A Judge May Engage in Extra-Judicial Activities To Improve the Law, the Legal System, and the Administration of Justice

Canon 5. A Judge Should Regulate Extra-Judicial Activities To Minimize the Risk of Conflict with Judicial Duties

Public Office Conduct Codes New York

PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW Laws 1909, Chap. 51.

CHAPTER 47 OF THE CONSOLIDATED LAWS PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW

Sec. 17. Defense and indemnification of state officers and employees. 2 (b)

Sec. 18. Defense and indemnification of officers and employees of public entities.3 (b)

Sec. 74. Code of ethics.(2)(3)(4)

§ 73. Business or professional activities by state officers and employees and party officers.

NY Attorney Conduct Code

(a) “Differing interests” include every interest that will adversely affect either the judgment or the loyalty of a lawyer to a client, whether it be a conflicting, inconsistent, diverse, or other interest.

CANON 5. A Lawyer Should Exercise Independent Professional Judgment on Behalf of a Client

DR 5-101 [1200.20] Conflicts of Interest - Lawyer’s Own Interests.

DR 5-102 [1200.21] Lawyers as Witnesses.

DR 5-103 [1200.22] Avoiding Acquisition of Interest in Litigation.

DR 5-104 [1200.23] Transactions Between Lawyer and Client.

DR 5-105 [1200.24] Conflict of Interest; Simultaneous Representation.

DR 5-108 [1200.27] Conflict of Interest - Former Client.

CANON 6. A Lawyer Should Represent a Client Competently

CANON 7. A Lawyer Should Represent a Client Zealously Within the Bounds of the Law

DR 7-102 [1200.33] Representing a Client Within the Bounds of the Law.

DR 7-110 [1200.41] Contact with Officials.

DR 8-101 [1200.42] Action as a Public Official.

DR 8-103 [1200.44] Lawyer Candidate for Judicial Office.

A. A lawyer who is a candidate for judicial office shall comply with section 100.5 of the Chief Administrator’s Rules Governing Judicial Conduct (22 NYCRR) and Canon 5 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

CANON 9. A Lawyer Should Avoid Even the Appearance of Professional Impropriety

DR 9-101 [1200.45] Avoiding Even the Appearance of Impropriety.

I declare under penalty of perjury and more that the foregoing statements in this CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM are true and correct.Executed on this ____ day, of______________, 20___. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims will subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties, including possible culpability in the RICO related crimes including the alleged attempted murder of the inventor Eliot Bernstein and his wife and children in a terrorist styled car-bombing attempt on their lives.

00 NOTE– THE CAR BOMBING IS NOT A SCENE OUT OF A WAR ZONE BUT INSTEAD TOOK PLACE IN BOYNTON BEACH FL

More images @ www.iviewit.tv

I agree to accept responsibility for the unbiased review, and presentation of findings to the appropriate party(ies) who also have executed this CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM prior to review. A lack of signature will serve as evidence that I have accepted this document with undisclosed conflict, relations, relationships or interests. In the event that I continue to represent these matters without signing such COI first, this failure to sign and return the COI will act as a formal admission of such conflicts, relations, relationships or interests and serve as Prima Facie evidence in the event criminal or civil charges are brought against me.

Organization:___________________________

Print FULL Name and Title ________________

Signature _____________________________

Date________/_________/__________

If you are unable to sign this COI and are therefore unable to continue further to pursue these matters, please attach a statement of whom we may contact as your replacement, in writing, within 10 business days to preclude legal actions against you for Obstruction of Justice and more. A copy can be sent to iviewit@iviewit.tv and the original sent to the mailing address below:

Eliot I. Bernstein

Inventor

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL (yes, two identically named)

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL

Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL

Uviewit Holdings, Inc. - DL

Uview.com, Inc. – DL

Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL

Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL

I.C., Inc. – FL

Iviewit.com LLC – DL

Iviewit LLC – DL

Iviewit Corporation – FL

Iviewit, Inc. – FL

Iviewit, Inc. – DL

Iviewit Corporation

2753 N.W. 34th St.

Boca Raton, Florida 33434-3459

(561) 245.8588 (o)

(561) 886.7628 (c)

(561) 245-8644 (f)

iviewit@iviewit.tv

http://www.iviewit.tv

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress

http://www.facebook.com/#!/iviewit

http://www.myspace.com/iviewit

http://iviewit.tv/wordpresseliot

http://www.youtube.com/user/eliotbernstein?feature=mhum

http://www.TheDivineConstitution.com

Also, check out

Eliot’s Testimony at the NY Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings Part 1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Cw0gogF4Fs&feature=player_embedded

and Part 2 @

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Apc_Zc_YNIk&feature=related

and

Christine Anderson Whistleblower Testimony @

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BlK73p4Ueo

and

Eliot Part 1 - The Iviewit Inventions @

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOn4hwemqW0

Eliot for President in 2012 Campaign Speech 1 with No Top Teeth, Don’t Laugh, Very Important

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DuIHQDcwQfM

Eliot for President in 2012 Campaign Speech 2 with No Top OR Bottom Teeth, Don’t Laugh, Very Important

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jbOP3U1q6mM

Thought that was crazy, try http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3mfWAwzpNlE&feature=results_main&playnext=1&list=PL2ADE052D9122F5AD

Other Websites I like:

http://www.deniedpatent.com

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com

http://www.judgewatch.org/index.html

http://www.enddiscriminationnow.com

http://www.corruptcourts.org

http://www.makeourofficialsaccountable.com

http://www.parentadvocates.org

http://www.newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com

http://cuomotarp.blogspot.com

http://www.disbarthefloridabar.com

http://www.trusteefraud.com/trusteefraud-blog

http://www.constitutionalguardian.com

http://www.americans4legalreform.com

http://www.judicialaccountability.org

www.electpollack.us

http://www.ruthmpollackesq.com

http://www.VoteForGreg.us Greg Fischer

http://www.liberty-candidates.org/greg-fischer/

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Vote-For-Greg/111952178833067

http://www.killallthelawyers.ws/law (The Shakespearean Solution, The Butcher)

We the people are the rightful master of both congress and the courts - not to overthrow the Constitution, but to overthrow the men who pervert the Constitution. -Abraham Lincoln

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This message and any attachments are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. SS 2510-2521.

This e-mail, fax or mailed message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail, fax or mail and destroy all copies of the original message and call (561) 245-8588. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through an electronic medium, please so advise the sender immediately in a formal written request.

*The Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. 119 Sections 2510-2521 et seq., governs distribution of this “Message,” including attachments. The originator intended this Message for the specified recipients only; it may contain the originator’s confidential and proprietary information. The originator hereby notifies unintended recipients that they have received this Message in error, and strictly proscribes their Message review, dissemination, copying, and content-based actions. Recipients-in-error shall notify the originator immediately by e-mail, and delete the original message. Authorized carriers of this message shall expeditiously deliver this Message to intended recipients. See: Quon v. Arch.

*Wireless Copyright Notice*. Federal and State laws govern copyrights to this Message. You must have the originator’s full written consent to alter, copy, or use this Message in any way. Originator acknowledges others’ copyrighted content in this Message. Otherwise, Copyright © 2011 by originator Eliot Ivan Bernstein, iviewit@iviewit.tv and www.iviewit.tv . All Rights Reserved.

EXHIBIT 1 – PARTIAL LIST OF CONFLICTED PARTIES

· Proskauer Rose, LLP; Alan S. Jaffe - Chairman Of The Board - (”Jaffe”); Kenneth Rubenstein - (”Rubenstein”); Robert Kafin - Managing Partner - (”Kafin”); Christopher C. Wheeler - (”Wheeler”); Steven C. Krane - (”Krane”); Stephen R. Kaye - (”S. Kaye”) and in his estate with New York Supreme Court Chief Judge Judith Kaye (“J. Kaye”); Matthew Triggs - (”Triggs”); Christopher Pruzaski - (”Pruzaski”); Mara Lerner Robbins - (”Robbins”); Donald Thompson - (”Thompson”); Gayle Coleman; David George; George A. Pincus; Gregg Reed; Leon Gold - (”Gold”); Albert Gortz - (”Gortz”); Marcy Hahn-Saperstein; Kevin J. Healy - (”Healy”); Stuart Kapp; Ronald F. Storette; Chris Wolf; Jill Zammas; FULL LIST OF 601 liable Proskauer Partners; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Proskauer partner, affiliate, company, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Proskauer ROSE LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Proskauer related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· MELTZER, LIPPE, GOLDSTEIN, WOLF & SCHLISSEL, P.C.; Lewis Melzter - (”Meltzer”); Raymond Joao - (”Joao”); Frank Martinez - (”Martinez”); Kenneth Rubenstein - (”Rubenstein”); FULL LIST OF 34 Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C. liable Partners; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C. partner, affiliate, company, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C.; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· FOLEY & LARDNER LLP; Ralf Boer (”Boer”); Michael Grebe (“Grebe”); Christopher Kise (“Kise”); William J. Dick - (”Dick”); Steven C. Becker - (”Becker”); Douglas Boehm - (”Boehm”); Barry Grossman - (”Grossman”); Jim Clark - (”Clark”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Foley & Lardner partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Foley & Lardner; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Foley & Lardner related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP; Richard Schiffrin - (”Schiffrin”); Andrew Barroway - (”Barroway”); Krishna Narine - (”Narine”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP; Norman Zafman - (”Zafman”); Thomas Coester - (”Coester”); Farzad Ahmini - (”Ahmini”); George Hoover - (”Hoover”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP; Martyn W. Molyneaux - (”Molyneaux”); Michael Dockterman - (”Dockterman”); FULL LIST OF 198 Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP liable Partners; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Christopher & Weisberg, P.A.; Alan M. Weisberg - (”Weisberg”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Christopher & Weisberg, P.A. partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Christopher & Weisberg, P.A.; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Christopher & Weisberg, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· YAMAKAWA INTERNATIONAL PATENT OFFICE; Masaki Yamakawa - (”Yamakawa”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Yamakawa International Patent Office partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Yamakawa International Patent Office; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Yamakawa International Patent Office related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· GOLDSTEIN LEWIN & CO.; Donald J. Goldstein - (”Goldstein”); Gerald R. Lewin - (”Lewin”); Erika Lewin - (”E. Lewin”); Mark R. Gold; Paul Feuerberg; Salvatore Bochicchio; Marc H. List; David A. Katzman; Robert H. Garick; Robert C. Zeigen; Marc H. List; Lawrence A. Rosenblum; David A. Katzman; Brad N. Mciver; Robert Cini; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Goldstein & Lewin Co. partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Goldstein & Lewin Co.; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Goldstein & Lewin Co. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· INTEL Corporation;

· Silicon Graphics Inc.;

· Lockheed Martin Corporation;

· Real 3D, Inc. (SILICON GRAPHICS, INC., LOCKHEED MARTIN & INTEL) & RYJO; Gerald Stanley - (”Stanley”); Ryan Huisman - (”Huisman”); RYJO - (”RYJO”); Tim Connolly - (”Connolly”); Steve Cochran; David Bolton; Rosalie Bibona - (”Bibona”); Connie Martin; Richard Gentner; Steven A. Behrens; Matt Johannsen; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO; Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO related or affiliated entities, and any successor companies both individually and professionally;

· Tiedemann Investment Group; Bruce T. Prolow (”Prolow”); Carl Tiedemann (”C. Tiedemann”); Andrew Philip Chesler; Craig L. Smith; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Tiedemann Investment Group partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Tiedemann Investment Group and any other Tiedemann Investment Group related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners; Stephen J. Warner - (”Warner”); ReneP. Eichenberger - (”Eichenberger”); H. Hickman Hank Powell - (”Powell”); Maurice Buchsbaum - (”Buchsbaum”); Eric Chen - (”Chen”); Avi Hersh; Matthew Shaw - (”Shaw”); Bruce W. Shewmaker - (”Shewmaker”); Ravi M. Ugale - (”Ugale”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners and any other Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· BROAD & CASSEL; James J. Wheeler - (”J. Wheeler”); Kelly Overstreet Johnson - (”Johnson”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Broad & Cassell partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Broad & Cassell and any other Broad & Cassell related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· FORMER IVIEWIT MANAGEMENT & BOARD; Brian G. Utley/Proskauer Referred Management - (”Utley”); Raymond Hersh - (”Hersh”)/; Michael Reale - (”Reale”)/Proskauer Referred Management; Rubenstein/Proskauer Rose Shareholder in Iviewit - Advisory Board; Wheeler/Proskauer Rose Shareholder in Iviewit - Advisory Board; Dick/Foley & Lardner - Advisory Board, Boehm/Foley & Lardner - Advisory Board; Becker/Foley & Lardner; Advisory Board; Joao/Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel - Advisory Board; Kane/Goldman Sachs - Board Director; Lewin/Goldstein Lewin - Board Director; Ross Miller, Esq. (“Miller”), Prolow/Tiedemann Prolow II - Board Director; Powell/Crossbow Ventures/Proskauer Referred Investor - Board Director; Maurice Buchsbaum - Board Director; Stephen Warner - Board Director; Simon L. Bernstein – Board Director (“S. Bernstein”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Former Iviewit Management & Board partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Former Iviewit Management & Board and any other Former Iviewit Management & Board related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT - WEST PALM BEACH FLORIDA; Judge Jorge LABARGA - (”Labarga”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT - WEST PALM BEACH FLORIDA staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time. Hereinafter, collectively referred to as (”15C”);

· THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE; Thomas Cahill - (”Cahill”); Joseph Wigley - (”Wigley”); Steven Krane, any other John Doe (”John Doe”) of THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time;

· THE FLORIDA BAR; Lorraine Christine Hoffman - (”Hoffman”); Eric Turner - (”Turner”); Kenneth Marvin - (”Marvin”); Anthony Boggs - (”Boggs”); Joy A. Bartmon - (”Bartmon”); Kelly Overstreet Johnson - (”Johnson”); Jerald Beer - (”Beer”); Matthew Triggs; Christopher or James Wheeler; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) The Florida Bar staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time;

· MPEGLA, LLC. – Kenneth Rubenstein, Patent Evaluator; Licensors and Licensees, please visit www.mpegla.com for a complete list; Columbia University; Fujitsu Limited; General Instrument Corp; Lucent Technologies Inc.; Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.; Mitsubishi Electric Corp.; Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips); Scientific Atlanta, Inc.; Sony Corp. (Sony); EXTENDED LIST OF MPEGLA LICENSEES AND LICENSORS; any other John Doe MPEGLA, LLC. Partner, Associate, Engineer, Of Counsel or Employee; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) MPEGLA, LLC partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to MPEGLA, LLC and any other MPEGLA, LLC related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· DVD6C LICENSING GROUP - Licensors and Licensees, please visitwww.mpegla.com for a complete list; Toshiba Corporation; Hitachi, Ltd.; Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd.; Mitsubishi Electric Corporation; Time Warner Inc.; Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd.; EXTENDED DVD6C DEFENDANTS; any other John Doe DVD6C LICENSING GROUP Partner, Associate, Engineer, Of Counsel or Employee; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) DVD6C LICENSING GROUP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to DVD6C LICENSING GROUP and any other DVD6C LICENSING GROUP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Harrison Goodard Foote incorporating Brewer & Son; Martyn Molyneaux, Esq. (“Molyneaux”); Any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Harrison Goodard Foote (incorporating Brewer & Son) partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Harrison Goodard Goote incorporating Brewer & Son and any other related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman of the Grievance Committee of the Second Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee;

· James E. Peltzer, Clerk of the Court of the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Judicial Department; Diana Kearse, Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee of the Second Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee;

· Houston & Shahady, P.A., any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Houston & Shahady, P.A., affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Houston & Shahady, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Furr & Cohen, P.A. any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Furr & Cohen, P.A., affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Furr & Cohen, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Jeffrey Friedstein (“Friedstein”); Sheldon Friedstein (S. Friedstein”), Donald G. Kane (“Kane”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and any other related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· David B. Simon, Esq. (“D. Simon”);

· Sachs Saxs & Klein, PA any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Sachs Saxs & Klein, PA, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Sachs Saxs & Klein, PA related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Huizenga Holdings Incorporated any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Huizenga Holdings Incorporated affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Huizenga Holdings Incorporated related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Davis Polk & Wardell;

· Ropes & Gray LLP;

· Sullivan & Cromwell LLP;

· Eliot I. Bernstein, (“Bernstein”) a resident of the State of California, and former President (Acting) of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates and subsidiaries and the founder of Iviewit and principal inventor of its technology;

· P. Stephen Lamont, (“Lamont”) a resident of the State of New York, and former Chief Executive Officer (Acting) of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. and all of its affiliates and subsidiaries;

· SKULL AND BONES; The Russell Trust Co.; Yale Law School;

· Council on Foreign Relations;

· The Bilderberg Group;

· The Federalist Society;

· The Bradley Foundation;

Please include in the COI check the defendants and any other parties in the legally related cases in New York District Court Southern District of New York to Docket No 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT, including but not limited to;

A. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 08-4873-cv

B. (07cv11196) Bernstein et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT Defendants, in addition to those already listed herein, include but are not limited to;

· STATE OF NEW YORK;

· THE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM;

· STEVEN C. KRANE in his official and individual Capacities for the New York State Bar Association and the Appellate Division First Department Departmental disciplinary Committee, and, his professional and individual capacities as a Proskauer partner;

· ESTATE OF STEPHEN KAYE, in his professional and individual capacities;

· MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer;

· JON A. BAUMGARTEN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· SCOTT P. COOPER, in his professional and individual capacities;

· BRENDAN J. O’ROURKE, in his professional and individual capacities;

· LAWRENCE I. WEINSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· WILLIAM M. HART, in his professional and individual capacities;

· DARYN A. GROSSMAN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· JOSEPH A. CAPRARO JR., in his professional and individual capacities;

· JAMES H. SHALEK; in his professional and individual capacities;

· GREGORY MASHBERG, in his professional and individual capacities;

· JOANNA SMITH, in her professional and individual capacities;

· TODD C. NORBITZ, in his professional and individual capacities;

· ANNE SEKEL, in his professional and individual capacities;

· JIM CLARK, in his professional and individual capacities;

· STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR, FLORIDA;

· FLORIDA SUPREME COURT;

· HON. CHARLES T. WELLS, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. HARRY LEE ANSTEAD, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. R. FRED LEWIS, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. PEGGY A. QUINCE, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. KENNETH B. BELL, in his official and individual capacities;

· THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual capacities;

· DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and individual capacities;

· DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA;

· CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA.;

· ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and individual capacities;

· ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual capacities;

· PAUL CURRAN in his official and individual capacities;

· MARTIN R. GOLD in his official and individual capacities;

· SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT;

· CATHERINE O’HAGlEN WOLFE in her official and individual capacities;

· HON. ANGELA M. MAZZARELLI in her official and individual capacities;

· HON. RICHARD T. ANDRIAS in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. DAVID B. SAXE in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. DAVID FRIEDMAN in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. LUIZ A. GONZALES in his official and individual capacities;

· SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT;

· SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECONDDEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE;

· HON. A. GAIL PRUDENTI in her official and individual capacities;

· HON. JUDITH S. KAYE in her official and individual capacities;

· STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION;

· ANTHONY CARTUSCIELLO in his official and individual capacities;

· LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;

· OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;

· ELIOT SPITZER in his official and individual capacities, as both former Attorney General for the State of New York, and, as former Governor of the State of New York;

· ANDREW CUOMO in his official and individual capacities, as both former Attorney General for the State of New York, and, as current Governor of the State of New York;

· Steven M. Cohen in his official and individual capacities, as both former Chief of Staff to Attorney General Andrew Cuomo for the State of New York, and, as current Secretary to the Governor of the State of New York;

· Emily Cole, in her official and individual capacities, as an employee of Steven M. Cohen for the Governor Cuomo of the State of New York;

· COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA;

· VIRGINIA STATE BAR;

· ANDREW H. GOODMAN in his official and individual capacities;

· NOEL SENGEL in her official and individual capacities;

· MARY W. MARTELINO in her official and individual capacities;

· LIZBETH L. MILLER, in her official and individual capacities;

· MPEGLA LLC; LAWRENCE HORN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· INTEL CORP.; LARRY PALLEY, in his professional and individual capacities;

· SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.;

· LOCKHEED MARTIN Corp;

· EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE;

· ALAIN POMPIDOU in his official and individual capacities;

· WIM VAN DER EIJK in his official and individual capacities;

· LISE DYBDAHL in her official and personal capacities;

· DIGITAL INTERACTIVE STREAMS, INC.;

· ROYAL O’BRIEN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED, WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional and individual capacities;

· WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional and individual capacities;

· BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities;

· ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities;

· JOHNNIE E. FRAZIER in his official and individual capacities;

· IVIEWIT, INC., a Florida corporation;

· IVIEWIT, INC., a Delaware corporation;

· IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Uview.com, Inc.);

· UVIEW.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation;

· IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Iviewit Holdings, Inc.);

· IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida corporation;

· IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Florida corporation;

· I.C., INC., a Florida corporation;

· IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation;

· IVIEWIT.COM LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;

· IVIEWIT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;

· IVIEWIT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation;

· IBM CORPORATION;

To be added New Defendants in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit through amendment or in any anticipated future litigations and criminal filings:

· Andrew Cuomo, in his official and individual capacities,

· Steven M. Cohen, in his official and individual capacities,

· Emily Cole, in her official and individual capacities,

· Justice Richard C. Wesley in his official and individual capacities,

· Justice Peter W. Hall in his official and individual capacities,

· Justice Debra Ann Livingston in her official and individual capacities,

· Justice Ralph K. Winter in his official and individual capacities,

· P. Stephen Lamont, (Questions about Lamont’s filings on behalf of others and more filed with criminal authorities and this Court notified of the alleged fraudulent activities of Lamont)

· Alan Friedberg, in his official and individual capacities,

· Roy Reardon, in his official and individual capacities,

· Martin Glenn, in his official and individual capacities,

· Warner Bros. Entertainment, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Time Warner Communications, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· AOL Inc., (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Ropes & Gray,

· Stanford Financial Group,

· Bernard L. Madoff et al.

· Marc S. Dreier, (Already named Defendant in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Sony Corporation, (Already named Defendant in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Ernst & Young, (Already named Defendant in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Arthur Andersen, (Already named Defendant in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Enron, (Already named Defendant in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

C. Other Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY Related to Christine C. Anderson

· 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT;

· 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.;

· 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.;

· 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.;

· 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.;

· 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.;

· 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.;

· 08cv04053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.;

· 08cv04438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.

· 08cv06368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York

· All parties list at the URL

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/Appendix%20A/index.htm#proskauer

FOOTNOTES CONDENSED

FOOTNOTE 1 -  il Sommo Poeta ~ Durante degli Alighieri, “Divina Commedia” 1308-1321 Canto III

FOOTNOTE 3 -  From Anderson’s Sworn Statement to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee, “Specifically, I discovered and reported that employees of the DDC had engaged in, inter alia, the “whitewashing” [of] complaints of misconduct leveled against certain “select” attorneys and law firms. This “whitewashing” sometimes involved burying cases or destroying evidence, so that certain complaints were inevitably, unavoidably, dismissed. I witnessed this destruction of evidence myself. Other reported misconduct involves victimizing attorneys lacking privileged positions or connections.”

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=365

FOOTNOTE 4 -  “Legal Document: Request for Discovery” Posted on July 22, 2011 by Fred Celani

FOOTNOTE 5 -  “The Wall Street Pentagon Papers: Biggest Scam In World History Exposed: Are The Federal Reserve’s Crimes Too Big To Comprehend?” by David DeGraw, Fourwinds10.com, December 02, 2011

and

“Federal Reserve Secretly Loaned Gaddafi & Others $1.2 Trillion Say Monetary Experts - We’ve given the Fed the power to create paper money, secretly distribute it to political favorites, and thereby sway our stock market and elections,” says Craig R. Smith, founder and Chairman of Swiss America Trading Corporation. In Re-Making Money: Ways to Restore America’s Optimistic Golden Age, a new White Paper published August 15 on the 40th Anniversary of Nixon’s action, Smith and Ponte call for new ways to again anchor the U.S. Dollar to prevent politicians and the Fed from simply creating trillions out of thin air and using this money for political purposes. The politicizing of paper money, Smith says, is a major cause of today’s economic problems: unemployment, near-zero economic growth, inflation, collapsed bubbles such as the housing market, and investor insecurity among them.”

PR Web, August 22, 2011

http://www.prweb.com/releases/2011/8/prweb8737214.htm

and

“The Wall Street Pentagon Papers: Biggest Scam In World History Exposed: Are The Federal Reserve’s Crimes Too Big To Comprehend?” by David DeGraw, Fourwinds10.com, December 02, 2011

and

“16 TRILLION Reasons Why Everyone In Washington, Including The President, Should Be Heading To Prison

A Time For Choosing” by Gary Jackson, FreeRepublic, LLC, July 22, 2011

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2752675/posts

FOOTNOTE 6 -  “TARP 18x: the Unknown Bailout that Requires a Supreme Court Ruling for Full Disclosure” by Steadfast Finances, January 30, 2012

FOOTNOTE 7 - The Anderson statement can be found online @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=114 and has already been submitted to this Court by both Anderson and Plaintiff, hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein in case the documents have been destroyed as depicted by Anderson.

FOOTNOTE 8 -  NOTE THAT MANY ATTORNEYS AT LAW ARE DIRECTLY CHARGED WITH WAR/TORTURE CRIMES & JUDGES ARE DOING THE COVERING UP.

“Getting Away with Torture - The Bush Administration and Mistreatment of Detainees” Human Rights Watch July 2011

http://www.hrw.org/reports/2005/04/23/getting-away-torture

and

“US judge rules to protect CIA over torture” Press TV August 2, 2011

http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/192015.html

FOOTNOTE 9 -  “The corporate bandits who stole your money while you slept” by Robinson, Matthew B. (2005). Justice Blind? Ideals and Realities of American Criminal Justice (2nd Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.

http://www.justiceblind.com/new/bandits.htm .

and

Wall Street Isn’t Winning – It’s Cheating, POSTED: By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone; Jann S. Wenner, Editor and Publisher, October 25, 2011

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/blogs/taibblog/owss-beef-wall-street-isnt-winning-its-cheating-20111025

and

“Greed is good: maximization and elite deviance in America” By Matthew Robinson, Daniel Murphy”

*****Special Note should be given to how many of these companies directly relate to Plaintiff’s RICO & Antitrust Lawsuit as DEFENDANTS.

FOOTNOTE 10 -  “Are Ratings Agencies Taking Bribes? By Emily Knapp, Wall St. Cheat Sheet, October 31 2011

FOOTNOTE 11 - “THE NINE STAGES OF AMERICAN AUTOGENOCIDE” by Martha Rose Crow, M.S.

http://blacktalkradionetwork.com/profiles/blogs/americas-secret-updated-for

FOOTNOTE 12 -

[12] Nuremberg Principle VI states,

“The crimes hereinafter set out are punishable as crimes under international law:

(a) Crimes against peace:

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;

(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

(b) War crimes:

Violations of the laws or customs of war which include, but are not limited to, murder, ill-treatment or deportation of slave labor or for any other purpose of the civilian population of or in occupied territory; murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war or persons on the Seas, killing of hostages, plunder of public or private property, wanton destruction of cities, towns, or villages, or devastation not justified by military necessity.

(c) Crimes against humanity: Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation and other inhumane acts done against any civilian population, or persecutions on political, racial, or religious grounds, when such acts are done or such persecutions are carried on in execution of or in connection with any crime against peace or any war crime.”

FOOTNOTE 13 -  “Analysis of Financial Terrorism in America: Over 1 Million Deaths Annually, 62 Million People With Zero Net Worth, As the Economic Elite Make Off With $46 Trillion” by David DeGraw, founder and editor of AmpedStatus.com. The following report includes adapted excerpts from David DeGraw’s book, “The Road Through 2012: Revolution or World War III.” Release Date: 9.28.11 August 10, 2011

http://ampedstatus.org/exclusive-analysis-of-financial-terrorism-in-america-over-1-million-deaths-annually-62-million-people-with-zero-net-worth-as-the-economic-elite-make-off-with-46-trillion

FOOTNOTE 14 - Eugenics is a form of Mass Genocide and Precluded in the Genocide Treaty signed by President Ronald Reagan. “Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: …(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;


FOOTNOTE 16 -  New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing Transcripts – June 08, 2009 & September 24, 2009 – Hart Testimony p. 83-102, hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein @

FOOTNOTE 17 -  When Plaintiff later filed CRIMINAL and ETHICAL COMPLAINTS against Friedberg and others, the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Department lost them. In Plaintiff’s testimony to the NY Senate Judiciary Committee, Chairman Sampson confronts Friedberg as to where Plaintiff’s complaints against he and his Cronies are, Friedberg states he will get back to the Committee with what has happened to the missing complaints. Instead, Friedberg sends Plaintiff a letter dismissing the complaints against himself and his Cronies. Yes, Friedberg literally dismissed his own complaint, violating just about every Ethical Rule and NY State Law regarding Conflict of Interest, Obstruction of Justice and Fair and Impartial Due Process.

FOOTNOTE 18 -  “In Aftermath of Financial Crisis, Who’s Being Held Responsible?” PBS News Hour by Ray Suarez

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=qmO7W8iC5LE&noredirect=1

FOOTNOTE 19 -  “Insight: Top Justice officials connected to mortgage banks - - U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder and Lanny Breuer, head of the Justice Department’s criminal division, were partners for years at a Washington law firm [Covington & Burling] that represented a Who’s Who of big banks and other companies at the center of alleged foreclosure fraud, a Reuters inquiry shows.” By Scot J. Paltrow, Reuters, Fri Jan 20, 2012http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/01/20/us-usa-holder-mortgage-idUSTRE80J0PH20120120

FOOTNOTE 20 -  “Foreclosure fraud investigators forced out at attorney general’s office” By Kimberly Miller, Palm Beach Post Staff Writer Tuesday, July 12, 2011

and

Office of the Attorney General Economic Crimes Division – “UNFAIR, DECEPTIVE AND UNCONSCIONABLE ACTS IN FORECLOSURE CASES” Prepared by: June M. Clarkson, Theresa B. Edwards and Rene D. Harrod of the Florida Attorney General Office

http://www.scribd.com/doc/46278738/Florida-Attorney-General-Fraudclosure-Report-Unfair-Deceptive-and-Unconscionable-Acts-in-Foreclosure-Cases

and

“Revealed: How Countrywide and Angelo Mozilo Crashed the Housing Market without Punishment” By Damien Hoffman, December 05 2011

http://wallstcheatsheet.com/stocks/revealed-how-countrywide-and-angelo-mozilo-crashed-the-housing-market-without-punishment.html/

Video 1 - http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7390540n – CBS NEWS

Video 2 - http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7390542n – CBS NEWS

“Lawyers Investigating SEC Madoff Frauds Provide Help to Fellow Lawyers Eight SEC employees disciplined over failures in Madoff fraud case; none are fired”, The Washington Post by David S. Hilzenrath - November 11, 2011

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2011/11/lawyers-investigating-sec-madoff-frauds.html

and

http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/seven-sec-employees-disciplined-on-failure-to-stop-madoff-fraud/2011/11/10/gIQA3kYYCN_story.html

FOOTNOTE 21 -  “MOODY’S ANALYST BREAKS SILENCE: Says Ratings Agency Rotten To Core With Conflicts” by Henry Blodget at Business Insider, Inc. August 19, 2011

http://www.businessinsider.com/moodys-analyst-conflicts-corruption-and-greed-2011-8 Read more: http://www.businessinsider.com/moodys-analyst-conflicts-corruption-and-greed-2011-8#ixzz1VhH71l3r

and

“Comment on SEC Proposed Rules for Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organizations – File No. S7-18-11 by William J. Harrington”

http://www.sec.gov/comments/s7-18-11/s71811-33.pdf

FOOTNOTE 22 -  The word Entitlements needs further clarification here, as there are two distinct confusing meanings. The first meaning “is a guarantee of access to benefits based on established rights or by legislation. A “right” is itself an entitlement associated with a moral or social principle, such that an “entitlement” is a provision made in accordance with legal framework of a society”. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entitlement In this usage, an Entitlement is akin to a worker paying for and buying, with REAL HARD EARNED MONEY through REAL HARD WORK, benefits such as Social Security, Medicare/Medicaid and Unemployment Insurance. For these future promises to pay REAL FUNDS ARE DEDUCTED OUT OF EVERY REAL PAYCHECK OF THE WORKER THROUGHOUT LIFE, used to BUY GUARANTEED and FUNDED BENEFITS LATER. Here we have Workers PURCHASING an Government Insurance PRODUCT via Contract, not some sort of freeloading of benefits in any gifted or undeserved manner and factually workers are legally entitled to those PAID FOR FUTURE BENEFITS.

The Second Definition of Entitlement, “In a casual sense, the term ‘entitlement’ refers to a notion or belief that one (or oneself) is deserving of some particular reward or benefit—if given without deeper legal or principled cause, the term is often given with pejorative connotation (e.g. a ‘sense of entitlement’)”. This second usage is strikingly different from the first in that here there is NO LEGAL Entitlement to a Future Purchased Benefit, just a “sense”, which would be akin to say an unearned “TRUST FUND BABIES TRUST FUND”, where the benefactors inherit, not earn or pay for, the “entitled by birth” benefits. The only Entitlements necessary to cut in society are these type of UNEARNED or UNPAID FOR ENTITLEMENTS and BENEFITS but that would leave most of Congress needing a second job and purchasing the crap insurance of “Obama UnCare” versus their “Entitled” platinum plated Congressional Insurance Policies. Of course, our politicians and their families should have Platinum Plans for they earned it by bankrupting the Nation and World Economies? In other words, the only ones who appear to live off UNEARNED ENTITLEMENTS are those ROBBING the AMERICAN WORKERS of their HARD EARNED BENEFITS THEY PAID FOR AND ARE LEGALLY ENTITLED TO.

Another “entitlement” to cut would be “Trust Funds” as with estates currently passing 100% free of Death Taxes through further ILLEGAL DEREGULATIONS, we factually have a Monarchy. As if a Kings were passing the Kingdom, the United States, to their “entitled” children, who then pass it to theirs, further skewing the money supply, spoiling each successive generation until they are “rotten to the core” and let the GOOD PEOPLE who worked hard to get them their “entitled” positions, STARVE. Instead, as this is America and not the English Monarchy we freed ourselves from yesteryear, when someone who has “made it” dies with a billion, a small portion should pass to their next generation through a 90% estate tax, which in this instance would leave a whopping 100 Million Dollars to their heirs. Even this amount is not enough for these greedy ROBBER BABY BARONS where they currently have rigged the money supply further by passing all 1 BILLION free of tax. In the instance of a 90% estate tax, the remainder of the taxed monies, $900 Million, would return to the common money pool for the next big earners/inventors to earn and to pay for the PAID ENTITLEMENTS of the PEOPLE who WORKED HARD and are LEGALLY ENTITLED TO THEM.

Plaintiff fears however that like with the Good King, the People will have to have a real “Tea Party” again. Not to be confused with the Unpatriotic Tea Party of today’s politics but a true REVOLUTION and REVOLT against these “ENTITLED” SPOILED ROTTEN ELITIST TYRANTS WITH HARVARD AND YALE BOUGHT LEGAL DEGREES, whose legacy is to have decimated and destroyed our Great Nation, her People and her Honor. In Revolt the PEOPLE should carefully dissect those ELITISTS who inherited their wealth or gained it from CRIMINAL ACTS from those who WORKED HARD in legitimate positions to EARN such Wealth when TAKING BACK THE ILL GOTTEN GAINS.

The Entitlement SCAM appears yet another CRIME perpetrated against the PEOPLE by our “Elite” Congressional Criminals (elite only in the entitled “sense”) to rob funds set aside by workers for PAID FOR SOCIAL BENEFITS and now claim that the workers were not “entitled” to these PAID FOR BENEFITS, as if these were social welfare claims like their trust funds. Whereby the monies paid for by WORKERS throughout their LIFETIMES with LEGAL PROMISE TO PAY at RETIREMENT or if they become UNEMPLOYED are being kiped and pilfered by those “TRUST FUND BABIES” from Harvard and Yale, mostly who are running or more aptly ruining and robbing the Country, in delusions of grandeur, perhaps from too many “entitlements”. Those who have hardly worked a day in their lives and who do not pay any taxes, again we find robbing hard working Americans while making huge gains for themselves and the RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION.

FOOTNOTE 23 -  “Madoff Whistleblower: Big Banks Are Ripping Off Pension Funds.” By Peter Gorenstein | Daily Ticker August 19, 2001

http://finance.yahoo.com/blogs/daily-ticker/madoff-whistleblower-big-banks-ripping-off-pension-funds-152836936.html

FOOTNOTE 24 -  “The 50 Richest Members of Congress (2011)” “To determine the richest lawmakers, Roll Call adds up the minimum value of total assets reported by each Member on their annual financial disclosures and subtracts the minimum liabilities. Percent change refers to the change since last year’s disclosure forms. An asset valued at $5 million to $25 million is counted at the lesser amount, as is a liability valued at $1 million to $5 million.” August 22, 2011

The corporate media may obsess about what Occupy Wall Street is all about, but these images should make it clear.” AlterNet / By Les Leopold, October 23, 2011

FOOTNOTE 26 -

[26] Further, supporting evidence of this CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE committing MASS FRAUD can be found in the April 13, 2011, Report by the United States Senate, PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. The Committee is Chaired by Hon. Carl Levin and assisted in bipartisan fashion by Tom Coburn, Ranking Minority Member and is titled WALL STREET AND THE FINANCIAL CRISIS: ANATOMY OF A FINANCIAL COLLAPSE. The Report is located at the following URL, hereby fully incorporated in entirety by reference herein,

.

This detailed stinging report alleges fraud over 200 times in 650 pages, yet still NOT A SINGLE ARREST??? While most of this Criminal Activity defined in the report continues to take place in New York, and why not, when the “Fox” and “Fix”’ is in the Henhouse with this Court? Crime Pays when no one is protecting the People and Justice is complicit in the crimes. One must ask where are the US Attorneys, the New York Attorney General and the Governor of New York, the self-proclaimed “Sheriffs of Wall Street”, whom instead look more like Criminal Accomplices disguised as Sheriffs. Who are these “Barney Fife” Sheriffs? Again, we find more ATTORNEYS AT LAW, all with interests in the CONTROLLED DEMOLITION of the markets, betting against the People in rigged market collapses, fearing no Justice as they have disabled Justice.

and

“Is the SEC Covering Up Wall Street Crimes? A whistleblower claims that over the past two decades, the agency has destroyed records of thousands of investigations, whitewashing the files of some of the nation’s worst financial criminals.” By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone; Jann S. Wenner, Editor and Publisher August 17, 2011

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/is-the-sec-covering-up-wall-street-crimes-20110817

and

“SEC may have destroyed documents, says senator Grassley: Agency may have got rid of Goldman, Madoff documents” “The Securities and Exchange Commission may have destroyed documents and compromised enforcement cases involving activity at large banks and hedge funds during the height of the financial crisis in 2008, according to allegations made by a lawmaker on Wednesday.” By Ronald D. Orol, (MarketWatch) August 18, 2011

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/sec-may-have-destroyed-documents-senator-says-2011-08-17

“Why Isn’t Wall Street in Jail? Financial crooks brought down the world’s economy — but the feds are doing more to protect them than to prosecute them.” By Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone; Jann S. Wenner, Editor and Publisher

http://www.rollingstone.com/politics/news/why-isnt-wall-street-in-jail-20110216

and

“Why Do Dangerous Financial Criminals Roam Free? Prosecutors like Eric Schneiderman need cops on the beat to put financial crooks behind bars. But thanks to Bush, these cops are missing in action.” By June Carbone, Alternet, February 4, 2012

and

“William Black: Why Nobody Went to Jail During the Credit Crisis — The FBI is no longer chasing white collar criminals” by James J Puplava CFP with William K Black PhD at Financial Sense®

http://www.financialsense.com/financial-sense-newshour/guest-expert/2011/09/14/william-k-black-phd/why-nobody-went-to-jail-during-the-credit-crisis#.Toz2nH9u1OU.email

and

“If Mortgage Fraud Was Rampant, Why Aren’t [there] Criminal Charges?” By Matt Egan, Published May 06, 2011, FOXBusiness

and

“WW3 is on as Wall St. banks plunder economy.” Max Keiser, YOUTUBE (or aptly ELIOTUBE)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tZindTx0YDA&feature=player_embedded

and

“Obama: Banks broke no laws broken…More shameless than Bush” by Max Keiser

http://www.realecontv.com/videos/government-corruption/obama-banks-broke-no-laws-broken.html

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ks-sc4LYqck&feature=player_embedded

[Obama tries to Cover-Up for Economic Terrorism committed by his Republican Wall Street backers, keep in mind he has raised more money for the 2012 election from Republican Wall Streeters than all of the Republican Candidates in toto] see,

“Wall Street Still Gives More Cash to Obama Than to Republicans” by Noreen Malone, New York Media LLC. October 20, 2011

and

“Meltdown - The men who crashed the world” Part 1-4

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zZ_JfROhOE&feature=player_embedded

and

“The Failure to Prosecute Bank Crimes Creates a Disease at the Heart of Our Politics” By: David Dayen, Firedoglake, Monday February 6, 2012

http://news.firedoglake.com/2012/02/06/the-failure-to-prosecute-bank-crimes-creates-a-disease-at-the-heart-of-our-politics

“Deficiencies Found in Oversight of Seized Assets, U.S. Says” By Seth Stern - Sep 13, 2011, BLOOMBERG L.P.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2011-09-13/deficiencies-found-in-oversight-of-seized-assets-u-s-says.html

FOOTNOTE 27

[27] “Bush, Blair found guilty of war crimes - A War Crimes Tribunal in Malaysia has found former US President George W. Bush and former British Prime Minister Tony Blair guilty of war crimes for their roles in the Iraq war.” November 23, 2011by PressTV

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/211590.html

and

“The Torture Memos: just following orders, just following [LEGAL] advice?” Posted on July 12, 2011 by Richard Moorhead Law Professor at Cardiff University, LAWYERS WATCH

http://lawyerwatch.wordpress.com/2011/07/12/the-torture-memos-just-following-orders-just-following-advice/

and

“United States: Investigate Bush, Other Top Officials for Torture - Inquiry Into 2 Deaths in CIA Custody Insufficient” by Human Rights Watch July 11, 2011

http://www.hrw.org/en/news/2011/07/11/united-states-investigate-bush-other-top-officials-torture

and

“John F. Kennedy 2 - The George H. W. Bush Connection-Full Length Documentary - The sequel to Oliver Stone’s JFK, you won’t see in the cinema. A thoroughly documented criminal indictment establishing beyond a reasonable doubt the guilt of George H.W. Bush as a supervisor in the conspiracy to assassinate John Kennedy.”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DAQ5mFkrlDs&feature=autoshare

and

“Bush Family, C.I.A., Nazi Connection” October 28, 2007 -

http://www.myspace.com/270351075/blog/323241558

and

In 1939, Harriman and Prescott hired the Dulles brothers [law firm of Sullivan & Cromwell -] to hide Nazi involvement with U.B.C. [Union Banking Corporation] because they knew the things they had done were not in the best interest of America. But it didn’t work and U.B.C. was seized by the federal government on Nov. 17, 1942, under the Trading with the Enemy Act. The bank was a money laundering operation for Hitler. Prescott [Bush] was also forced to give up support to his favorite political ally Hitler. Prescott went to a Congress Hearing to try to get his Bank back. J. Edgar Hoover told him [Prescott Bush, Father to George HW Bush and GrandNaziFather to George W. (WarCriminal) Bush], “That’s right your a Nazi, and you run a Nazi Bank.” Prescott was denied request to keep the bank and the bank was seized. There were many other American & British Elite that funded Hitler & the Nazi’s rise to power. Henry Ford of Ford Motor Company, The Rockefeller family of Standard Oil, Thomas Watson of IBM, J. P. Morgan, Coca Cola, General Motors, The Rothschild Banking Family of England , etc… etc…etc… How do you think Germany built a Military big enough to take on the world in about a 10 year period?

[Note that many of these same UnAmerican, UnPatriotic, Fascist, Nazi Fry Loving, Spoiled Rotten SellOut’s who attempted the Current Coup on the United States are these same UNPATRIOTIC families. See Business Plot I for more information @ http://www.huppi.com/kangaroo/Coup.htm ]

and

Jason Bermas presents “Invisible Empire: A New World Order Defined” produced by Alex Jones,

and

“The High Priests of Globalisation” Will Hutton

http://www.bilderberg.org/

and

Agenda 21, EUGENICS “taking lives considered not worthy to be lived

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S5cu_5uoQ18

“Transcript: Interview with U.N. torture official Manfred Novak” By Glenn Greenwald, Salon Media Group, Inc. Saturday, Apr 25, 2009

FOOTNOTE 28 -  “AG [New York Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman] booted from key mtge. Panel” By MARK DECAMBRE, The New York Post, August 24, 2011

FOOTNOTE 29 - “Obama Admin Blocks Bank Investigations?” Uploaded by TheYoungTurks on Aug 22, 2011, YOUTUBE (Should be ELIOTTUBE as YOUTUBE is one of the largest infringers of Plaintiff Bernstein’s Video Inventions)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZL63bki4kzk&feature=player_embedded

FOOTNOTE 30 -  “Obama Goes All Out For Dirty Banker Deal” by Matt Taibbi, Rolling Stone; Jann S. Wenner, editor and publisher, August 24, 2011 | 11:17am

http://m.rollingstone.com/entry/view/id/16196/pn/all/p/0/?KSID=bcdc270d2877e6d6e53699d382c34a8c

FOOTNOTE 31 -  “The Nuremberg Trials: The Justice Trial” United States of America v. Alstötter et al.

(”The Justice Case”) 3 T.W.C. 1 (1948), 6 L.R.T.W.C. 1 (1948), 14 Ann. Dig. 278 (1948).

The Justice Trial is one of the most interesting of the Nuremberg trials. The trial of sixteen defendants, members of the Reich Ministry of Justice or People’s and Special Courts, raised the issue of what responsibility judges might have for enforcing grossly unjust–but arguably binding–laws. The trial was the inspiration for the movie Judgment at Nuremberg. The movie presented a somewhat fictionalized view of the trial.

FOOTNOTE 32 -

[32] “Florida attorney general, two fired lawyers in public dispute” July 21, 2011|By Kathleen Haughney, Sun Sentinel

http://articles.sun-sentinel.com/2011-07-21/business/fl-bondi-fired-attorneys-react-20110721_1_foreclosure-fraud-clarkson-division-director

FOOTNOTE 33 - John Emerich Edward Dalberg-Acton, 1st Baron Acton, KCVO, DL aka John Dalberg-Acton, 8th Bt aka Lord Acton

“No doubt the responsibility in such a case is shared by those who ask for a thing. But if the thing is criminal, if, for instance, it is a licence to commit adultery, the person who authorises the act shares the guilt of the person who commits it. Here again what I have said is not in any way mysterious or esoteric. It appeals to no hidden code. It aims at no secret moral. It supposes nothing, and implies nothing but what is universally current and familiar. It is the common, even the vulgar, code I appeal to.

I cannot accept your canon that we are to judge Pope and King [or US Presidents, Judges, Regulators, etc.] unlike other men, with a favourable presumption that they did no wrong. If there is any presumption it is the other way, against the holders of power, increasing as the power increases. Historic responsibility has to make up for the want of legal responsibility. Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power corrupts absolutely. Great men are almost always bad men, even when they exercise influence and not authority, still more when you superadd the tendency or the certainty of corruption by authority. There is no worse heresy than that the office sanctifies the holder of it.” Here are the greatest names coupled with the greatest crimes; you would spare those criminals, for some mysterious reason. I would hang them higher than Haman, for reasons of quite obvious justice, still more, still higher for the sake of historical science.

http://oll.libertyfund.org/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1407&Itemid=283

FOOTNOTE 34 - Shira Scheindlin Dismissal Order August 08, 2008

FOOTNOTE 36 -  Scheindlin Order Footnote = Memorandum of Law in Support of the Defendants’ Proskauer Motion to Dismiss, at 1.

FOOTNOTE 37 -  Wikipedia Entry on Foley & Lardner @ http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Foley_%26_Lardner

Note here that InJustice Antonin Scalia worked at Defendant Foley & Lardner Law Firm. Also note here that Falsely Anointed President Barack Hussein Obama II is also a former Alumni of the Foley & Lardner Law Firm, a mainly Republican Law Firm, who worked under Defendant Michael Grebe, former CEO of Foley & Lardner Law Firm and also former Republican National Committee Chief Counsel during the Bush Election Fraud and Treason. Grebe is rumored to be the largest MoneyBag for both the Bush and Obama Campaigns???

“Notable current and former employees Barack Obama, President of the United States, summer associate in the Chicago office of Hopkins & Sutter, which was acquired by Foley & Lardner in 2001

Antonin Scalia, United States Supreme Court Justice, was a summer associate in the Milwaukee office”

FOOTNOTE 38 -  “THE STOLEN ELECTION OF 2000”

http://www.angelfire.com/ca3/jphuck/Book10Ch.3.html

Second, two sons of Justice Scalia worked for law firms involved with Bush’s legal team. One son, Eugene Scalia, was a partner in the Washington office of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher. Another partner, Theodore Olson, argued Bush’s case before the Supreme Court. The young Scalia served as Special Assistant to Attorney General of the United States William Barr. The other son, John Scalia, accepted a position with the Miami-based firm [Defendant in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit] Greenberg Traurig on November 7. The next day, Barry Richard, a partner in the firm, said he was called about representing Bush in Florida.

FOOTNOTE 39 -  “THE ENCYCLOPEDIA OF CONSPIRACIES AND CONSPIRACY THEORIES” by Michael Newton, Facts On File, Inc., 2006

http://www.scribd.com/doc/25045356/The-Encyclopedia-of-Conspiracies-and-Conspiracy-Theories

FOOTNOTE 40 -  “The Supreme Court decision in Bush v. Gore still resonates” Editorial SentinelSource.com, Posted: Tuesday, May 31, 2011

FOOTNOTE 41 -

Breyer, J., dissenting

SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

——————————————————————————–

No. 00—949

——————————————————————————–

GEORGE W. BUSH, et al., PETITIONERS v.

ALBERT GORE, Jr., et al.

ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE FLORIDA SUPREME COURT

[December 12, 2000]

http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/00-949.ZD3.html

FOOTNOTE 42 -  The Iviewit technologies have been valued in the TRILLIONS of dollars, valued by leading engineers as “PRICELESS” and the “HOLY GRAIL” inventions of the digital imaging and video worlds, affecting virtually every form of digital communication. In fact, almost 99.99% of users of digital imaging and video products use the Iviewit Technologies in some form or other, .01% is most likely statistical aberration. Therefore, the Iviewit RICO exposes one of the largest crimes against an individual in World History, certainly the largest against any US Citizen/Inventor. Where again we find Attorneys at Law, trusted Patent and Corporate Counsel, charged with the crime of theft of their RETAINED CLIENT’S Intellectual Property Rights and Royalties. As the Amended Complaint alleges, the royalties owed the Inventors have been ILLEGALLY CONVERTED by their former Intellectual Property and Corporate Counsel for their own gains.

One of the Intellectual Property Attorneys accused, Defendant Raymond Anthony Joao of Defendants Proskauer Rose/Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel put 90+ patents in his very own name. Joao acted as lackey for the main Iviewit Retained Attorney at Law, Patent Hack, Defendant Kenneth Rubenstein of Defendant Proskauer Rose/Defendant Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel and the same Rubenstein who is the sole (soulless) patent Reviewer for DEFENDANT MPEGLA, LLC. MPEGLA one of the largest infringers and chief conspirators in the Iviewit Intellectual Properties theft, where Rubenstein represented Iviewit and then stole the Patent Pending/Suspending IP off to his Patent Pools at MPEGLA, LLC, then through a pattern of Antitrust and Racketeering Activity precluded the Inventors of their rights. We find that Joao after being accused by Iviewit Management of Falsifying Patent Oaths went to work with the recently imprisoned Marc S. Dreier at the law firm of Dreier & Baritz, information regarding how the Dreier affair is directly related to Iviewit has already been submitted to this court.

The Attorneys at Law then used the courts to facilitate their crime by disabling the inventors’ Intellectual Property rights to their inventions through Conflict after Conflict in the Courts and Prosecutorial Offices to block Plaintiff/Inventor’s legal rights, all as explained in detail in the Iviewit Amended Complaint and RICO Statement. Finally, in order to LAUNDER the ILL GOTTEN ROYALTIES over the past DECADE, the lawyers have created further frauds, allegedly including the Ponzis aka Criminal RICO Money Laundering Operations such as, Madoff, Dreier, Stanford and others. Evidence has been presented to this Court and the US District Court regarding the relation of these Ponzis to the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST, showing their direct ties to Defendants in this Lawsuit, the Ponzis used as vehicles to wash hundreds of billions of converted stolen royalties, while making it appear to be from Ponzi losses or other financial fraud schemes, again more COMPLEX ILLEGAL LEGAL CRIMES USING THE COURTS TO AID & ABET the Crimes, all again, only committable with a LEGAL DEGREE MISUSED.

FOOTNOTE 43 -  “Deathbed confessions, photos support claims that George H. Scherf(f), Jr., was the 41st U.S. president” Idaho Observer April 2007

http://proliberty.com/observer/20070405.htm

FOOTNOTE 44 -  “Prescott Bush, From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia”

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prescott_Bush

FOOTNOTE 45 - The PLOT TO SEIZE THE WHITE HOUSE” by Jules Archer, HAWTHORN BOOKS, INC. PUBLISHERS / New York, 1973

http://www.wanttoknow.info/plottoseizethewhitehouse

FOOTNOTE 46 -  Wikipedia on Un-American Activities Committee

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/House_Un-American_Activities_Committee

FOOTNOTE 47 -  “Right Before Our Eyes! There Should Be No Doubt After You Watch This Shocking Video! Mind blowing speech by Robert Welch in 1958 predicting Insiders plans to destroy America” Posted Knowing on April 27, 2011

FOOTNOTE 48 -  “Libertarian candidate Stan Jones points out American Union, Plans for Chips, Trackers and Control by Gov’t”

Jones Report | October 10, 2006

Stan Jones is running for Senate in Montana as a Libertarian. He lays out the extent to which Clinton, through NAFTA, and George W. Bush, through the expansion of NAFTA and the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP), have sold out our country to world governance.

The candidate expressed being compelled to change in his planned remarks to point out the secret plan to lead us into One World Government through a North American Union with a common currency (the Amero), as well as the related plan to build a superhighway throughout the continent. This is linked with a compulsory National ID tracked by a radio-frequency chip.

http://www.jonesreport.com/articles/111006_stan_jones.html

and

“Truth! Stan Jones’ Speech About New World Order & North American Union”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9-FuCyl588

and

Iviewit Letter “Re: Senate Cult Bill for Your Consideration” to Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton addressing Treasonous Cults in the US Government and Proposed Legislation to Stop it. Iviewit has yet to receive a response from Hillary Clinton, who is a cult member in several of the Un-American Cults complained about, ie Bilderbergs, CFR and more. October 17, 2007 -

www.iviewit.tv/senatecultbill.htm

and

http://iviewit.tv/bodyold20080402.htm

and

“Want your mind BLOWN? Watch this video! OBAMA ANSWERS to the VATICAN!” Uploaded by TruthTVMichigan on Apr 14, 2011, YOUTUBE (truly ELIOTTUBE)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rd1Twnoq-Dw (Grab some Popcorn and the kids & educate yourself)

FOOTNOTE 49 -  “Documents: Bush’s Grandfather Directed Bank Tied to Man Who Funded Hitler - President Bush’s grandfather was a director of a bank seized by the federal government because of its ties to a German industrialist who helped bankroll Adolf Hitler’s rise to power, government documents show.” Friday, October 17, 2003

FOOTNOTE 50  - www.tenc.net [Emperor's Clothes] “Nazis in the Attic” Part 6 By Randy Davis

http://emperors-clothes.com/articles/randy/swas5.htm

FOOTNOTE 51 -

FOOTNOTE 52 “The Horrifying American Roots of Nazi Eugenics” By Edwin Black

http://hnn.us/articles/1796.html

FOOTNOTE 53 -  “The Nazi Hydra in America: Suppressed History of a Century” By Glen Yeadon, John Hawkins

131

FOOTNOTE 54 - “The Bush family and the S&L Scandal”, rationalrevolution.net

http://rationalrevolution.net/war/bush_family_and_the_s.htm and http://rationalrevolution.net/war/index.htm

FOOTNOTE 55 -  “Welcome To The New World Order (FULL LENGTH FILM)”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gty42YkcSeQ&feature=related

and

“The CIA revealed as the Gestapo of the Vatican’s Fourth Reich.” By Paul W. Kincaid, PRESS Core.ca.

http://presscore.ca/2011/?p=4871

and

THRIVE – The Movie, by Foster and Kimberly Gamble, Clear Compass Media

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oI2LGmZ_EP4

http://thrivemovement.com

FOOTNOTE 56 -  “Supreme Injustice, how the High Court Hijacked Election 2000” by Alan Dershowitz – Oxford University Press 2001.

http://books.google.com/books?id=eVqdJks5Op0C&lpg=PP1&pg=PP1#v=onepage&q&f=false

FOOTNOTE 57 -  “Elements of a conspiracy - How Bush’s man at Fox News worked to shape the outcome of the US election” By Kate Randall 17 November 2000

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2000/nov2000/fox-n17.shtml and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Prescott_Ellis

FOOTNOTE 58 -  “REINING IN THE IMPERIAL PRESIDENCY - Lessons and Recommendations Relating to

the Presidency of George W. Bush” by United States House of Representatives ~ House Committee on the Judiciary Majority Staff Report to Chairman John Conyers, Jr., January 13, 2009

http://judiciary.house.gov/hearings/printers/110th/IPres090113.pdf

and

“Articles of Impeachment – President George W. Bush - H. Res. 1258, 110th Cong. (2008). Congressmen Dennis Kucinich and Robert Wexler June 10, 2008

http://chun.afterdowningstreet.org/amomentoftruth.pdf

and

“Dennis Kucinich Documents Grounds for Impeachment of Bush & Cheney”

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=6265058101839429571# - Part 1

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=1857978401494382897# - Part 2

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-785946969577220461# - Part 3

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=442901163793389423# - Part 4

Dennis Kucinich on War Crimes in 2011 ILLEGAL WAR OF AGGRESSION LIBYA

“Kucinich, Interview, Obama Libya War Violates Constitution and UN Resolution, Libya”

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bji4XY6GtzA

FOOTNOTE 59 -  “Obama’s Eight Degrees of Dick Cheney - Vice President Cheney is related to Sen. Barack Obama.” By Anne E. Kornblut, The Washington Post Company, October 16, 2007


FOOTNOTE 60 -  “THIS JUST IN . . .Obama and Cheney, Making Connections” by Anne E. Kornblut - The Washington Post,

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/10/16/AR2007101602362.html

FOOTNOTE 61 -  “Judicious temperament: Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor speaks up against political attacks on courts.” Houston Chronicle, Published Friday, March 17, 2006

FOOTNOTE 62 -  ADMISSION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST by the NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL in handling CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST ANDREW CUOMO and STEVEN M. COHEN et al. / Phone Call on April 14, 2011 with James Rogers on behalf of Harlan Levy referred by Steven Michael Cohen, Chief of Staff to Governor Andrew Cuomo, regarding FILED Criminal Complaints against the New York Attorney General’s Office, Former Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Steven Michael Cohen, Secretary to Governor Andrew Cuomo and Monica Connell of the New York State Office of the Attorney General et al.” FIled may 20, 2011

incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

and

iviewit calls to ny governor Andrew Cuomo, Emily Cole, Stephen M Cohen, re: Criminal ComplaintS. NY Attorney General eric Schneiderman ADMISSION OF CONFLICTS and need for ny ag to seek independent counsel in all iviewit matters.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pwFlEIp6E incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

and

New York Governor Andrew Cuomo’s “Right Hand Man” Steven M. Cohen Flees Sinking Ship Amidst Iviewit’s Rico & Antitrust Lawsuit, AG Eric Schneiderman Office Admits Conflict of Interest with Iviewit, September 24, 2011. Cohen Returns to Private Sector in wake of Iviewit Criminal Complaints against Cuomo and himself.

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-new-york-governor-andrew-cuomo-s-right-hand-man-steven-m-cohen-flees-sinking-ship-amidst-iviewit-s-rico-antitrust-lawsuit-ag-eric-schneiderman-o-1316880094.html incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

and

June 13, 2009 Letter to NYAG Chief of Staff Steven Cohen Regarding Conflict of Interest

FOOTNOTE 63 -  Insert Link to Order Dated January 05, 2010.

“New York Supreme Court Whistleblower. Corruption in New Your Courts - Enough is Enough.” Ethics Complaint - Industry Whistleblower Blog by Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox Tuesday, February 15, 2011

and

http://www.suppressthetruth.com/2010/09/andrew-cuomo-new-york-attorney-general.html

and

Frank Brady aka Kevi McKeown Anderson Document

FOOTNOTE 66 - Plaintiff incorporates by reference herein Any/All records from the “Legally Related” Anderson Whistleblower Lawsuit, the “Legally Related” Lawsuits and any/all other legal records relating to Nicole Corrado, in any legal matters in the US District Court, this Court or any other court and any/all other Regulatory and Investigate Entities acting in these matters. Records, including but are not limited to, all “SEALED” and “IMPOUNDED RECORDS” that relate to these matters. PLAINTIFF DEMANDS that these records be instantly made part of this Lawsuit and incorporated in this MOTION, CERTIFIED and CATALOGUED and ENTERED IN THE DOCKET, due to the ALLEGATIONS by Anderson of DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION IN OFFICIAL COURT PROCEEDINGS, including matters now before this Court and the District Court, as further defined herein.

Federal Crime Reporting Statutes

The federal offense of failure to disclose a felony, if coupled with some act concealing the felony, such as suppression of evidence, harboring or protecting the person performing the felony, intimidation or harming a witness, or any other act designed to conceal from authorities the fact that a crime has been committed.

Title 18 U.S.C. § 4. Misprision of felony. Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

A federal judge, or any other government official, is required as part of the judge’s mandatory administrative duties, to receive any offer of information of a federal crime. If that judge blocks such report, that block is a felony under related obstruction of justice statutes, and constitutes a serious offense.

Upon receiving such information, the judge is then required to make it known to a government law enforcement body that is not themselves involved in the federal crime.

——————————————————————————–

Misprision of a Felony

Misprision of a felony is the offense of failure to inform government authorities of a felony that a person knows about. A person commits the crime of misprision of a felony if that person:

Knows of a federal crime that the person has witnessed or that has come to the person’s attention, or failed to prevent.

Fails to report it to a federal judge or other federal official (who is not thems4elves involved in the crime).

——————————————————————————–

Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361. Action to compel an officer of the United States to perform his duty. The district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any action in the nature of mandamus to compel an officer or employee of the United States or any agency thereof to perform a duty owed to the plaintiff.

This federal statute permits any citizen to file a lawsuit in the federal courts to obtain a court order requiring a federal official to perform a mandatory duty and to halt unlawful acts. This statute is Title 28 U.S.C. § 1361.

Obstructing Justice Statutes

Title 18 U.S.C. § 2. Principals. (a) Whoever commits an offense against the United States or aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures its commission, is punishable as a principal. (b) Whoever willfully causes an act to be done which if directly performed by him or another would be an offense against the United States, is punishable as a principal.

Note: The legislative intent to punish as a principal not only one who directly commits an offense and one who “aids, abets, counsels, commands, induces or procures” another to commit an offense, but also anyone who causes the doing of an act which if done by him directly would render him guilty of an offense against the United States. Case law decisions: Rothenburg v. United States, 1918, 38 S.Ct. 18, 245 U.S. 480, 62 L.Ed. 414, and United States v. Giles, 1937, 57 S.Ct. 340, 300 U.S. 41, 81 L.Ed. 493.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 3. Accessory after the fact. Whoever, knowing that an offense against the United States had been committed, receives, relieves, comforts or assists the offender in order to hinder or prevent his apprehension, trial or punishment, is an accessory after the fact.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 4 (misprision of felony). Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined not more than $500 or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1505. Whoever corruptly … influences, obstructs, or impedes or endeavors to influence, obstruct, or impede the due the proper administration of the law under which any pending proceeding is being had before any department or agency of the United States … shall be fined not more than $5,000 or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1510. Obstruction of criminal investigation.

(a) Whoever willfully endeavors by means of bribery to obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to a violation of any criminal statute of the United States by any person to a criminal investigator shall be fined not more than $5,000, or imprisoned not more than five years, or both.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1512. Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant

(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation or physical force, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to–

(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;

(2) cause or induce any person to–

(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official proceeding;

(3) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense … shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both.

(c) Whoever intentionally harasses another person and thereby hinders, delays, prevents, or dissuades any person from–

(1) attending or testifying in an official proceeding;

(2) reporting to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United States the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense … (3) arresting or seeking the arrest of another person in connection with a Federal offense; or

(4) causing a criminal prosecution, or a parole or probation revocation preceding, to be sought or instituted, or assisting in such prosecution or proceeding;

or attempts to do so, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.

(e) For the purposes of this section–

(1) an official proceeding need not be pending or about to be instituted at the time of the offense; and

(2) the testimony, or the record, document, or other object need not be admissible in evidence or free of a claim of privilege.

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 1513. Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant.

(a) Whoever knowingly engages in any conduct and thereby causes bodily injury to another person or damages the tangible property of another person, or threatens to do so, with intent to retaliate against any person for (1) the attendance of a witness or party at an official proceeding, or any testimony given or any record, document, or other object produced by a witness in an official proceeding; or (2) any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense …”

——————————————————————————–

Title 18 U.S.C. § 111. Impeding certain officers or employees. Whoever … intimidates, or interferes with any person … while engaged in … the performance of his official duties shall be fined … or imprisoned …

——————————————————————————-

Racketeering Enterprise Statutes and Criteria

Title 42 USC § 1961. Definition. As used in this chapter-(1) “racketeering activity” means:

(A) any act or threat involving … relating to 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice), section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations), section 1511 (relating to obstruction of State or local law enforcement), section 1951 (relating to interference with commerce, robbery or extortion), section 1952 (relating to racketeering, …

Title 42 USC § 1962. Prohibited Activities.

(b) It shall be unlawful for any person through a pattern or racketeering activity or through collection of an unlawful debt to acquire or maintain, directly or indirectly, any interest in or control of any enterprise which is engaged in, or the activities of which affect, interstate or foreign commerce.

(c) It shall be unlawful for any person employed by or associated with any enterprise engaged in, or the activities of which affect, to conduct or participate, directly or indirectly, in the conduct of such enterprise’s affairs through a pattern of racketeering activity or collection of unlawful debt.

(d) It shall be unlawful for any person to conspire to violate any of the provisions of subsections (a), (b), or (c) of this section. …

JUDICIAL Canon 3. A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Impartially and Diligently

(D) Disciplinary responsibilities.

(1) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a substantial violation of this Part shall take appropriate action.

(2) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a substantial violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility shall take appropriate action.

(3) Acts of a judge in the discharge of disciplinary responsibilities are part of a judge’s judicial duties.

FOOTNOTE 68 - Taped Conversations with New York Governor Andrew Cuomo office, Steven M. Cohen (Chief of Staff), James Rogers, Esq., and Emily Cole.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pwFlEIp6E

FOOTNOTE 69 - As of July 11, 2011, Cohen has been relieved of service to Andrew Cuomo.

“NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN ADMISSION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BY JAMES ROGERS, ESQ. IN HANDLING IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES & ELIOT BERNSTEIN’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST ANDREW CUOMO AND STEVEN M. COHEN. DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION OF ANDREW CUOMO AND ELIOT SPITZER FOR VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICE RULES & FELONY RICO CRIMES. CALL FOR NY ATTORNEY GENERAL TO CEASE ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS OF STATE SENIOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS, INCLUDING FORMER CHIEF JUDGE OF NEW YORK JUDITH KAYE IN THE IVIEWIT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL RICO AND ANTITRUST LAWSUIT, “LEGALLY RELATED” BY FEDERAL JUDGE SHIRA SCHEINDLIN TO A WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT OF CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON A NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY. Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner Main Suspects in Patent Theft Worth Trillions.”

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=588

and

“Steven Michael Cohen, Andrew Cuomo Sr. Adviser Flees Sinking Cuomo Ship Over Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein’s Criminal Complaints against Cohen and Cuomo. Gotham Corruption at the Top Heating Up”

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=591

FOOTNOTE 70 -

http://exposecorruptessex.com/CourtInspectorGeneral.html

November 1, 2009 To: Inspector General for NY Unified Court System at ig@courts.state.ny.us

Re: Intolerable corruption and criminal conduct in our Appellate Court Discipline by Terence Finnan

and

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205

Tuesday, October 27, 2009 Letter to Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin United States District Judge Daniel Patrick Moynihan United States Courthouse 500 Pearl St. New York, NY 10007-1312

Re: IVIEWIT LETTER TO US FED JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN RE CRIMINAL “WHISTLEBLOWER” ALLEGATIONS in Christine C. Anderson v. New York State et al. Docket 07cv09599 alleging Disciplinary Complaint Fixing by the “CLEANER” for US Attorneys, New York District Attorneys and ADA’s; Code of Conduct for US Judges Canon 3B(5), Protecting the People. Eliot I. Bernstein.

Both footnote references incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

Steven Michael Cohen, Andrew Cuomo Sr. Adviser Flees Sinking Cuomo Ship Over Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein’s Criminal Complaints against Cohen and Cuomo. Gotham Corruption at the Top Heating Up

Wednesday, July 27th, 2011

Did Steven M. Cohen Flee the Governor of New York Andrew Cuomo’s office because of Iviewit’s Criminal Complaints against he and Cuomo  http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=588 or perhaps it was because of the taped phone conversations http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pwFlEIp6E where Cohen describes himself as already being in “PRISON” prior to fleeing the stinkin sinking Cuomo ship.  What’s the last thing you see from Space looking at a Sinking Ship?  The Rats Asses.  Who is Emily Cole on the Taped Conversations, could it be daughter of Maria Cuomo Cole and leatherman Kenneth Cole, the plot thickens in Gotham.

ALM Properties, Inc.

Page printed from: http://www.nylj.com

After 4 1/2 Years With Cuomo, Cohen Returns to Private Sector

07-11-2011

Steven M. Cohen, Governor Andrew M. Cuomo’s top aide, is leaving his post to look for work in the private sector, the governor’s office announced Friday.

Mr. Cohen has served as secretary to Mr. Cuomo since he took office on Jan. 1. Before that he was counselor and chief of staff to Mr. Cuomo during Mr. Cuomo’s entire four-year term as attorney general.

Mr. Cohen will be replaced by Larry Schwartz, a senior adviser to the governor and formerly secretary to Governor David Paterson.

Mr. Schwartz was set to assume the secretary position today, and Mr. Cohen will remain on staff for a few weeks during the transition.

“Steve has been a critical member of a team that has produced results for the people of the state,” Mr. Cuomo said in a news release. “He has been both a friend and advisor, and he will be missed.”

Before going to work in the attorney general’s office, Mr. Cohen was a partner in Cooley Godward Kronish’s litigation department.

From 1991 to 1998, he was an assistant U.S. attorney in the Southern District of New York, serving as chief of the violent gangs unit.

Mr. Cohen, 48, said that while his time in public service had been deeply rewarding, his family obligations mean he will need to spend more time in his New York City home and earn more than his $166,074 salary as secretary.

“The cost of public service, especially when you have a family and you live in New York City, really catches up with you,” he said. “I really had to get back to a life that was New York City-based and not Albany-based.”

Mr. Cohen has three children: Madeline, 17; Ethan, 14; and Elias, 11.

“I began to think about the cost of their college education,” he said. “I have a responsibility as a father.”

When Mr. Cohen first began working for Mr. Cuomo, he committed to stay for two years. He said he was compelled to stay longer by what he saw as Mr. Cuomo’s ability to effect dramatic and needed change in New York. He considered leaving when Mr. Cuomo became governor, but Mr. Cuomo urged him to stay for at least the beginning of the term.

“The governor’s view was that we were going to have a six month period that was going to be critical,” Mr. Cohen said. “You start this job, it’s almost like being shot out of a cannon. You don’t have time to put together your team.”

So Mr. Cohen decided to stay with the incoming governor for the first six months.

“Part of it was purely selfish—I wanted to be part of it—and part of it was that if he was going to attempt something that was almost impossible, I was going to do anything I could to help him,” he said.

Mr. Cohen said that the achievements of the last six months—which saw Albany pass a budget on time for the first time in years, adopt a property tax cap and legalize gay marriage, have borne him out.

Anyone who predicted the governor’s accomplishments six months ago, Mr. Cohen said, would have been called “delusional.”

“I was part of a team that showed that Albany can function, that what is required is strong, intelligent leadership, that the passage of the Marriage Equality Act proves that you can have a progressive agenda, you can have a smart agenda, and that New York state can be a leader,” Mr. Cohen said, adding that he was particularly proud of helping win gays the right to marry.

“From a personal standpoint, to be part of the Marriage Equality passage, and that initiative, is really an extraordinary thing,” he said. “I really feel that it’s the type of thing that people will look back at generations from now and say, that was a time when state government made a transformative difference for people.”

The accomplishment, Mr. Cohen said, meant overcoming a culture in Albany that was skeptical about the possibility of significant change.

“The notion was, in 2009, you had a Democratic majority in the Senate,” he said. “You couldn’t get it passed then. Why do you think you can get it passed now [with a Republican majority]?”

The key, he said, was to get a bipartisan coalition of gay marriage supporters to come together and to stay on plan, regardless of internal disagreements on tactics, a kind of discipline that Mr. Cohen said had often been missing in Albany. He called it part of a “transition back to a functioning government.”

Mr. Cohen said that Mr. Cuomo’s work as governor was a continuation of his work as attorney general, when he also pushed for reform.

“We changed the model. There was a focus on using cases to drive change and to drive reform that wasn’t about a single case and a single defendant,” he said. “It was about reforming industries, changing practices, altering the structure of the way entities operated.”

Mr. Cohen pointed to the attorney general’s office’s investigation into pay-for-play practices in the state pension system, which ultimately resulted in the arrests and convictions of former comptroller Alan Hevesi and his political consultant Hank Morris, as examples of the office’s approach.

“It was walking into an industry where, for a generation, people had said, ‘Pay-for-play is just business as usual, it’s not illegal,’” Mr. Cohen said.

Mr. Cohen said he has no firm plans about where to go next. While he could return to private law practice, he is “wide open” to other options in business, he said.

“I have spent four and a half years in managing a large institution, but also have been engaged on a day-to-day basis in solving complex problems,” he said. “It is sort of a natural point for me to stop for a few weeks, take a deep breath and figure out what’s next.”

—–
The New York Times
July 8, 2011

Cuomo Appoints Top Aide of Paterson’s as His Own

Lawrence S. Schwartz, a longtime adviser to Democratic politicians who once helped run a campaign for former Gov. Mario M. Cuomo, was appointed on Friday to be the top aide to Mario’s son, Gov. Andrew M. Cuomo.

Mr. Schwartz will be the first person in at least several decades to serve as secretary to the governor for two consecutive administrations. He held the same position for Gov. David A. Paterson, and brings to the job a reputation for intensity as well as competence.

Mr. Schwartz, 54, replaces Steven M. Cohen, 48, who has been Mr. Cuomo’s secretary since the start of his term in January, and who was also Mr. Cuomo’s right-hand man in the attorney general’s office. Mr. Cohen had made it clear that his tenure in the governor’s office would be brief, and he is expected to return to private law practice.

Mr. Cohen played a pivotal role in negotiations over same-sex marriage legislation and was seen as a moderating influence in an otherwise hard-charging, and sometimes combative, administration. His primary role had been overseeing Mr. Cuomo’s transition to the governor’s office.

His exit is the first high-level departure from an executive team that had a remarkably successful run in its first six months. Facing a divided legislature, Mr. Cuomo was able to deliver on a number of his campaign promises: a 2 percent cap on property tax increases, a state budget that closed a $10 billion deficit without broad-based tax increases and the legalization of same-sex marriage.

Mr. Cuomo said that Mr. Cohen “has been both a friend and adviser, and he will be missed,” and added that he was “gratified that Larry has agreed to continue with the administration.”

Mr. Schwartz already played a prominent role in the Cuomo administration as a senior adviser; he led negotiations with lawmakers during the legislative session that ended late last month.

In a statement Friday, Mr. Schwartz said he looked “forward to working with Governor Cuomo and the entire staff to build on the work we have already started.”

Mr. Schwartz, who became Mr. Paterson’s secretary in February 2009, is widely credited with steadying that administration during a period of staff turmoil and criticism over the search for a replacement for Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton after she was named secretary of state.

Mr. Schwartz’s first stint as secretary was not without controversy; he and a number of other state officials were criticized in a lengthy report by the state inspector general examining a casino contract. But he also kept the governor’s office running relatively smoothly even as a flurry of scandals engulfed the administration.

“The instant he took over, there was a sense that there was a grown-up in the room, that decisions were going to get made,” said Peter Kauffmann, who served as communications director for part of Mr. Paterson’s tenure. “Larry Schwartz was the guy that kept state government functioning, at least the executive branch.”

But Mr. Schwartz has also had an often contentious relationship with the Legislature.

“I don’t think Larry has a deep admiration for legislative bodies,” said Richard Brodsky, a former Westchester Assemblyman who praised Mr. Schwartz for his competence, but said negotiations with him could be rough.

“I did employ a broad and pungent vocabulary,” Mr. Brodsky said. “So did he.”

Mr. Schwartz, who grew up on Long Island, is the son of a kosher butcher and a school secretary. He was senior class president at Comsewogue High School, majored in political science at the State University of New York at Binghamton and began running political campaigns after college. His long history with the Cuomos can be traced back to his role as deputy campaign manager for the unsuccessful re-election campaign of the governor’s father, Mario Cuomo, in 1994.

Before joining the Paterson administration, Mr. Schwartz served as the top aide to Andrew J. Spano, then the Westchester County executive. In that role, he was known for delivering bad news; a profile in The New York Times in 2002 once described him as Mr. Spano’s “ ‘No’ Man.”

“Many times he would get the animosity from people for doing things that I wanted,” Mr. Spano said in an interview this week. “I got to be the good guy.”

Mr. Schwartz is known for his intensity. As a high school soccer goalkeeper, he sought advice from Shep Messing, then a professional goalie for the New York Cosmos.

“He wrote him a letter trying to learn how to jump higher,” recalled Mr. Schwartz’s brother Robert, an assistant district attorney in Nassau County. “He wrote him a letter back, and Larry would practice in the basement, to build his calf muscles or something. At one point he put a hole in the ceiling with his head. I don’t think my dad was too happy about it at the time.”

—–

Ianimated 3d eyeballVIEWanimated 3d eyeballIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Surf with Vision

Eliot I. Bernstein
Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL (yes, two identically named)
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL
Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL
Uviewit Holdings, Inc. - DL
Uview.com, Inc. – DL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL
I.C., Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com LLC – DL
Iviewit LLC – DL
Iviewit Corporation – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Corporation

2753 N.W. 34th St.
Boca Raton, Florida 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o)
(561) 886.7628 (c)
(561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv
http://www.iviewit.tv
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress

http://www.facebook.com/#!/iviewit

http://www.myspace.com/iviewit
http://iviewit.tv/wordpresseliot
http://www.youtube.com/user/eliotbernstein?feature=mhum


Also, check out
Eliot’s Testimony at the NY Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings Part 1
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8Cw0gogF4Fs&feature=player_embedded
and Part 2 @

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Apc_Zc_YNIk&feature=related
and
Christine Anderson Whistleblower Testimony @
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BlK73p4Ueo
and Eliot Part 1 - The Iviewit Inventions @

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LOn4hwemqW0

Other Websites I like:
http://www.deniedpatent.com
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com
http://www.judgewatch.org/index.html

http://www.enddiscriminationnow.com
http://www.corruptcourts.org
http://www.makeourofficialsaccountable.com
http://www.parentadvocates.org
http://www.newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com

http://cuomotarp.blogspot.com

http://www.disbarthefloridabar.com

http://www.trusteefraud.com/trusteefraud-blog

http://www.constitutionalguardian.com

http://www.americans4legalreform.com

http://www.judicialaccountability.org

http://www.ruthmpollackesq.com

http://www.VoteForGreg.us Greg Fischer
http://www.liberty-candidates.org/greg-fischer/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Vote-For-Greg/111952178833067

http://www.killallthelawyers.ws/law (The Shakespearean Solution, The Butcher)

Protect Our Elections
Stop the Chamber
Koch Watch
Stop Domestic Terror
American Crossroads Watch
Indict Breitbart
Campaign Accountability Watch
Disbar Torture Lawyers
Restore Justice at Justice

NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN ADMISSION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BY JAMES ROGERS, ESQ. IN HANDLING IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES & ELIOT BERNSTEIN’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST ANDREW CUOMO AND STEVEN M. COHEN. DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION OF ANDREW CUOMO AND ELIOT SPITZER FOR VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICE RULES & FELONY RICO CRIMES. CALL FOR NY ATTORNEY GENERAL TO CEASE ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS OF STATE SENIOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS, INCLUDING FORMER CHIEF JUDGE OF NEW YORK JUDITH KAYE IN THE IVIEWIT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL RICO AND ANTITRUST LAWSUIT, “LEGALLY RELATED” BY FEDERAL JUDGE SHIRA SCHEINDLIN TO A WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT OF CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON A NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY. Proskauer Rose and Foley & Lardner Main Suspects in Patent Theft Worth Trillions.

Wednesday, May 25th, 2011
I eyeball31VIEWeyeball31IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Surf with Vision

Copies of the SIGNED and FILED LETTER to NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL @

Andrew Cuomo and Steven Michael Cohen Criminal Complaints and New York Attorney General Admission of Conflict Letter

COPIES of the CALLS @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pwFlEIp6E

——————————————–

Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form

Please accept and return signed the following Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form (COI) before continuing further with adjudication, review or investigation of the attached letter to, the New York Attorney General’s Office, titled,

ADMISSION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST by the NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL in handling CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST ANDREW CUOMO and STEVEN M. COHEN et al. / Phone Call on April 14, 2011 with James Rogers on behalf of Harlan Levy referred by Steven Michael Cohen, Chief of Staff to Governor Andrew Cuomo, regarding FILED Criminal Complaints against the New York Attorney General’s Office, Former Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Steven Michael Cohen, Secretary to Governor Andrew Cuomo and Monica Connell of the New York State Office of the Attorney General et al.

and any/all materials relating to Eliot Bernstein and or the Iviewit companies.

After 10 Days, if this form has not been signed or subsequently turned over to a NON CONFLICTED PARTY, your Failure to comply may result in criminal and civil charges FILED against you FOR AIDING AND ABETTING A RICO CRIMINAL ORGANIZATION, FEDERAL OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and more, AS NOTED HEREIN.

The Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form designed to ensure that the review and any determinations from such review of the enclosed materials should not be biased by any conflicting financial interest or any other conflicting interest by those reviewers responsible for the handling of this confidential information. Whereby any conflict with any of the main alleged perpetrators of the alleged crimes referenced in these matters or any other perpetrators not known at this time must be fully disclosed and affirmed in writing and returned by to any review.

Disclosure forms with “Yes” answers, by any party, to any of the following questions, are demanded not to open the remainder of the documents or opine in any manner until reviewed and approved by the Iviewit companies and Eliot I. Bernstein. If you feel that conflict of interest exists that cannot be eliminated through conflict resolution with the Iviewit Companies or Eliot Bernstein, instantly forward the matters to the next available reviewer that is free of conflict that can sign and complete the requisite disclosure. Please identify conflicts that you have, in writing, upon terminating your involvement in the matters to the address listed at the end of this disclosure form. As many of these alleged perpetrators are large law firms, members of various state and federal courts and officers of federal, state and local law enforcement agencies, careful review and disclosure of any conflict with those named herein is pertinent in your continued handling of these matters objectively.

These matters already involve claims of, including but not limited to, Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Public Offices, Whitewashing of Official Complaints in the Supreme Courts of New York, Florida, Virginia and elsewhere, Threatening a Federal Witness in a Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit, Document Destruction and Alteration, Obstructions of Justice, RICO and ATTEMPTED MURDER. The need for prescreening for conflict is essential to the administration of due process in these matters and necessary to avoid charges of OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE and more, against you. Federal District Court Judge Shira A. Scheindlin SDNY legally related these same matters to a New York Supreme Court Attorney Whistleblower Lawsuit who alleges similar claims of public office corruption against Supreme Court of New York Officials, US Attorneys, NY District Attorneys and Assistant District Attorneys. This is a formal request for full disclosure of any conflict on your part, such request conforming with all applicable state and federal laws, public office rules and regulations, attorney conduct codes and judicial canons or other international law and treatises requiring disclosure of conflicts and Withdrawal from matters where conflict precludes involvement.

Failure to comply with all applicable conflict disclosure rules, public office rules and regulations and laws, prior to continued action on your part, shall constitute cause for the filing of criminal and civil complaints against you for any decisions or actions you make prior to a signed Conflict Of Interest Disclosure Form, with all applicable regulatory and prosecutorial agencies. Complaints will be filed with all appropriate authorities, including but not limited to, the appropriate Federal, State, Local and International Law Enforcement Agencies, Public Integrity Officials, Judicial Conduct Officials, State and Federal Bar Associations, Disciplinary Departments and any/all other appropriate oversight agencies.

I. Do you, your spouse, and your dependents, in the aggregate have, any direct or indirect relations (relationships), or interest in any entity or any direct or indirect relations (relationships) to any of the parties listed in EXHIBIT 1 of this document and any of the named Defendants in these matters contained at the URL IVIEWIT RICO & ANTITRUST DEFENDANTS , URL hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein? Please review the online index in entirety.

_____NO ____YES

Please describe in detail any consideration(s) on a separate and attached sheet fully disclosing all information regarding the consideration(s). If the answer is Yes, please describe the relations, relationships and / or interests and please affirm whether such presents a conflict of interest in fairly reviewing the matters herein without undue bias or prejudice of any kind.

II. Do you, your spouse, and your dependents, in the aggregate have, any direct or indirect relations (relationships), or interest in any outside entity or any direct or indirect relations (relationships) to Any other known or unknown person or known or unknown entity not named herein that will cause your review of the complaint you are charged with investigating to be biased by any conflicting past, present, or future financial interest or any other interest(s)?

_____NO ____YES

Please describe in detail any identified conflicted parties on a separate and attached sheet. Fully disclose all information regarding the conflict. If the answer is Yes, please describe the relations, relationships and / or interests and please affirm whether such presents a conflict of interest in fairly reviewing the matters herein without undue bias or prejudice of any kind. Please indicate if you are seeking waiver of the conflict(s) or will be disqualifying from involvement in these matters.

III. Do you, your spouse, and your dependents, in the aggregate, receive salary or other remuneration or financial considerations from any entity related to the enclosed parties to the proceeding of the matters, defined in I, including but not limited to, campaign contributions whether direct, “in kind” or of any type at all?

_____NO ____YES

Please describe in detail any consideration(s) on a separate and attached sheet fully disclosing all information regarding the consideration(s). If the answer is Yes, please describe the relations, relationships and / or interests and please affirm whether such presents a conflict of interest in fairly reviewing the matters herein without undue bias or prejudice of any kind.

IV. Have you, your spouse, and your dependents, in the aggregate, had any prior communication(s), including but not limited to, phone, facsimile, e-mail, mail, verbal, etc. with any person related to the proceeding of the Iviewit or related matters as defined in I?

Please describe in detail any identified communication(s) on a separate and attached sheet fully disclosing all information regarding the communication(s). If the answer is Yes, please describe the communication(s) in detail, including but not limited to, who was present, what type of communication, the date and time, please affirm whether such communication(s) present a conflict of interest in fairly reviewing the matters herein without undue bias or prejudice of any kind.

V. I have run a thorough and exhaustive Conflict of Interest check to conform with any and all state, federal or local laws, public office rules and regulations and any professional association rules and regulations regarding disclosure of any conflicts to verify that my spouse, my dependents, and I in the aggregate, have no conflicts with any parties to the matters referenced herein.

_____NO ____YES

VI. I have notified all parties with any liabilities regarding my continued actions in these matters, including state agencies, insurance concerns or any other person with liability that may result from my actions in these matters.

_____NO ____YES

Relevant Sections of Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conduct Codes and Law

Conflict of Interest Laws & Regulations

Conflict of interest indicates a situation where a private interest may influence a public decision. Conflict of Interest Laws are Laws and designed to prevent conflicts of interest that deny fair and impartial due process and procedure thereby Obstructing Justice in State and/or Federal Civil and Criminal Proceedings. These Laws may contain provisions related to financial or asset disclosure, exploitation of one’s official position and privileges, improper relationships, regulation of campaign practices, etc. The Relevant Sections of Attorney Conduct Codes, Judicial Cannons, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law listed herein are merely a benchmark guide and other state, federal and international laws may be applicable to your particular circumstances in reviewing or acting in these matters. For a more complete list of applicable sections of law relating to these matters, please visit the URL,

RICO & ANTITRUST STATE FEDERAL AND INTERNATIONAL LAWS VIOLATED, fully incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

New York State Consolidated Laws Penal
ARTICLE 200 BRIBERY INVOLVING PUBLIC SERVANTS AND RELATED OFFENSES

S 200.03 Bribery in the second degree

S 200.04 Bribery in the first degree

S 200.05 Bribery; defense

S 200.10 Bribe receiving in the third degree

S 200.11 Bribe receiving in the second degree

S 200.12 Bribe receiving in the first degree

S 200.15 Bribe receiving; no defense

S 200.20 Rewarding official misconduct in the second degree

S 200.22 Rewarding official misconduct in the first degree S 200.25 Receiving reward for official misconduct in the second degree

S 200.27 Receiving reward for official misconduct in the first degree

S 200.30 Giving unlawful gratuities

S 200.35 Receiving unlawful gratuities

S 200.40 Bribe giving and bribe receiving for public office; definition of term

S 200.45 Bribe giving for public office

S 200.50 Bribe receiving for public office

ARTICLE 175 OFFENSES INVOLVING FALSE WRITTEN STATEMENTS

S 175.05 Falsifying business records in the second degree. S 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

S 175.15 Falsifying business records; defense

S 175.20 Tampering with public records in the second degree

S 175.25 Tampering with public records in the first degree

S 175.30 Offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree

S 175.35 Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree

NY Constitution ARTICLE XIII Public Officers

Public Officers - Public Officers ARTICLE 1

ARTICLE 2 Appointment and Qualification of Public Officers - ARTICLE 15 ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS

S 468-b. Clients` security fund of the state of New York

S 476-a. Action for unlawful practice of the law

S 476-b. Injunction to restrain defendant from unlawful practice of the law

S 476-c. Investigation by the attorney-general

S 487. Misconduct by attorneys

S 488. Buying demands on which to bring an action.

Public Officers Law SEC 73 Restrictions on the Activities Of Current and Former StateOfficers and Employees

Public Officers Law SEC 74 Code of Ethics

Conflicts of Interest Law, found in Chapter 68 of the New York City Charter, the City’s Financial Disclosure Law, set forth in section 12-110 of the New York City Administrative Code, and the Lobbyist Gift Law, found in sections 3-224 through 3-228 of the Administrative Code.

TITLE 18 FEDERAL CODE & OTHER APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAW

TITLE 18 PART I CH 11

Sec. 201. Bribery of public officials and witnesses

Sec. 225. - Continuing financial crimes enterprise

BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Sec. 205. - Activities of officers and employees in claims against and other matters affecting the Government

Sec. 208. - Acts affecting a personal financial interest

Sec. 210. - Offer to procure appointive public office

Sec. 225. - Continuing financial crimes enterprise

TITLE 18 PART I CH 79 Sec 1623 - False declarations before grand jury or court

Sec 654 - Officer or employee of United Statesconverting property of another

TITLE 18 PART I CH 73 Sec 1511 - Obstruction of State or local law enforcement

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 Sec 1961 RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT Organizations (”RICO”)

Section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice),

Section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations)

Section 1511 (relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement),

Section 1952 (relating to racketeering),

Section 1957 (relating to engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity),

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 SEC 1962 (A) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 SEC 1962 (B) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 SEC 1962 (C) RICO

title 18 part i ch 19 sec 1962 (d) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 19 CONSPIRACY Sec 371 CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT OFFENSE OR TO DEFRAUD UNITED STATES

TITLE 18 PART I CH 95 RACKETEERING SEC 1957 Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity

TITLE 18 PART I CH 47 Sec 1031 - Major fraud against the United States

Judicial Cannons

Canon 1. A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary

[1.1] Deference to the judgments and rulings of courts depends upon public confidence in the integrity and independence of judges. The integrity and independence of judges depends in turn upon their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they must comply with the law, including the provisions of this Code.Public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this Code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government under law.

Canon 2. A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities

(A) A judge shall respect and comply with the law and shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

[2.2][2A] The prohibition against behaving with impropriety or the appearance of impropriety applies to both the professional and personal conduct of a judge. Because it is not practicable to list all prohibited acts, the proscription is necessarily cast in general terms that extend to conduct by judges that is harmful although not specifically mentioned in the Code. Actual improprieties under this standard include violations of law, court rules or other specific provisions of this Code. The test for appearance of impropriety is whether the conduct would create in reasonable minds a perception that the judge’s ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with integrity, impartiality and competence is impaired.

Canon 3. A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Impartially and Diligently

(B) Adjudicative responsibilities.

(l) A judge shall be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it. A judge shall not be swayed by partisan interests, public clamor or fear of criticism.

(2) A judge shall require order and decorum in proceedings before the judge.

(D) Disciplinary responsibilities.

(1) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a substantial violation of this Part shall take appropriate action.

(2) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a substantial violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility shall take appropriate action.

(3) Acts of a judge in the discharge of disciplinary responsibilities are part of a judge’s judicial duties.

(E) Disqualification.

(1) A judge shall disqualify himself or herself in a proceeding in which the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned

[3.11][3B(6)(e)] A judge may delegate the responsibilities of the judge under Canon 3B(6) to a member of the judge’s staff. A judge must make reasonable efforts, including the provision of appropriate supervision, to ensure that Section 3B(6) is not violated through law clerks or other personnel on the judge’s staff. This provision does not prohibit the judge or the judge’s law clerk from informing all parties individually of scheduling or administrative decisions.

[3.21][3E(1)] Under this rule, a judge is disqualified whenever the judge’s impartiality might reasonably be questioned, regardless whether any of the specific rules in Section 3E(1) apply. For example, if a judge were in the process of negotiating for employment with a law firm, the judge would be disqualified from any matters in which that firm appeared, unless the disqualification was waived by the parties after disclosure by the judge.

[3.22][3E(1)] A judge should disclose on the record information that the judge believes the parties or their lawyers might consider relevant to the question of disqualification, even if the judge believes there is no real basis for disqualification.

Canon 4. A Judge May Engage in Extra-Judicial Activities To Improve the Law, the Legal System, and the Administration of Justice

Canon 5. A Judge Should Regulate Extra-Judicial Activities To Minimize the Risk of Conflict with Judicial Duties

Public Office Conduct Codes New York

PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW Laws 1909, Chap. 51.

CHAPTER 47 OF THE CONSOLIDATED LAWS PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW

Sec. 17. Defense and indemnification of state officers and employees. 2 (b)

Sec. 18. Defense and indemnification of officers and employees of public entities.3 (b)

Sec. 74. Code of ethics.(2)(3)(4)

§ 73. Business or professional activities by state officers and employees and party officers.

NY Attorney Conduct Code

(a) “Differing interests” include every interest that will adversely affect either the judgment or the loyalty of a lawyer to a client, whether it be a conflicting, inconsistent, diverse, or other interest.

CANON 5. A Lawyer Should Exercise Independent Professional Judgment on Behalf of a Client

DR 5-101 [1200.20] Conflicts of Interest - Lawyer’s Own Interests.

DR 5-102 [1200.21] Lawyers as Witnesses.

DR 5-103 [1200.22] Avoiding Acquisition of Interest in Litigation.

DR 5-104 [1200.23] Transactions Between Lawyer and Client.

DR 5-105 [1200.24] Conflict of Interest; Simultaneous Representation.

DR 5-108 [1200.27] Conflict of Interest - Former Client.

CANON 6. A Lawyer Should Represent a Client Competently

CANON 7. A Lawyer Should Represent a Client Zealously Within the Bounds of the Law

DR 7-102 [1200.33] Representing a Client Within the Bounds of the Law.

DR 7-110 [1200.41] Contact with Officials.

DR 8-101 [1200.42] Action as a Public Official.

DR 8-103 [1200.44] Lawyer Candidate for Judicial Office.

A. A lawyer who is a candidate for judicial office shall comply with section 100.5 of the Chief Administrator’s Rules Governing Judicial Conduct (22 NYCRR) and Canon 5 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

CANON 9. A Lawyer Should Avoid Even the Appearance of Professional Impropriety

DR 9-101 [1200.45] Avoiding Even the Appearance of Impropriety.

I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing statements in this CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM are true and correct. Executed on this ____ day of _______20__ the foregoing statements in this CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM are true. I am aware that any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or claims will subject me to criminal, civil, or administrative penalties, including possible culpability in the RICO related crimes including the alleged attempted murder of the inventor Eliot Bernstein and his wife and children in a car-bombing attempt on their lives.

Not a Scene from Iraq but Boynton Beach Florida

Not a Scene from Iraq but Boynton Beach Florida

More images @ www.iviewit.tv

I agree to accept responsibility for the unbiased review, and presentation of findings to the appropriate party(ies) who also have executed this CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE FORM. A lack of signature will serve as evidence that I have accepted this document withconflict in the event that I continue to represent the matters without signing such COI first and will be an admission of such conflict(s).

Organization – New York Attorney General

Print Name & Title and Organization

Signature Date

If you are unable to sign this COI and are therefore unable to continue further to pursue these matters, please attach a statement of whom we may contact as your replacement in writing withinbusiness days to preclude legal actions against you. A copy can be sent to iviewit@iviewit.tv and original to the mailing address below:

Eliot I. Bernstein
Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL (yes, two identically named)
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL
Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL
Uviewit Holdings, Inc. - DL
Uview.com, Inc. – DL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL
I.C., Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com LLC – DL
Iviewit LLC – DL
Iviewit Corporation – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Corporation

2753 N.W. 34th St.
Boca Raton, Florida 33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o)
(561) 886.7628 (c)
(561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv
http://www.iviewit.tv
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress
http://www.facebook.com/#!/iviewit
http://www.myspace.com/iviewit
http://iviewit.tv/wordpresseliot
http://www.youtube.com/user/eliotbernstein?feature=mhum

Iviewit Technologies, Inc. Logo

I-VIEW-IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

I-VIEW-IT HOLDINGS, INC.

“Surf with Vision”


Eliot I. Bernstein

Founder& Inventor
Direct Dial: (561) 245-8588 (o)
(561) 886-7628 (c)

Friday, May 20, 2011

New York State Office of the Attorney General

James Rogers, Esq.

Special Counsel and Senior Advisor to

Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman

120 Broadway

New York NY 10271

New York State Office of the Attorney General

Harlan Levy, Esq.

First Deputy Attorney General

120 Broadway

New York NY 10271

Re: / Phone Call on April 14, 2011 with James Rogers on behalf of Harlan Levy referred by Steven Michael Cohen, Chief of Staff to Governor Andrew Cuomo, regarding FILED Criminal Complaints against the New York Attorney General’s Office, Former Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Steven Michael Cohen, Secretary to Governor Andrew Cuomo and Monica Connell of the New York State Office of the Attorney General et al.

Dear Mssrs. Levy and Rogers,

Please let this letter serve as formal commemoration of our April 14, 2011 phone conversation between James Rogers, Esq., Special Counsel and Senior Advisor to Attorney General Eric T. Schneiderman and myself. A witnessing party on the phone call was Patrick Hanley. The following summarizes the salient points of the call with James Rogers, Esq., acting on behalf of Harlan Levy referred by Steven Michael Cohen, Chief of Staff to Governor Andrew Cuomo and prior calls with the Governor’s office.

Notably, Rogers acknowledged and admitted that he was precluded from handling the matters related to Iviewit’s Criminal Complaints and RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, as the Attorney General was Conflicted in the matters, as further defined herein. Admissions by Rogers of existing Conflicts of Interest now require IMMEDIATE corrective actions in ongoing State, Federal and International Criminal and Civil Proceedings going forward. The multiple Conflicts of Interest identified, caused Rogers to assert that the inherent Conflicts for himself, the Attorney General’s Office and other members of the Attorney General’s Office, now demanded that the Attorney General’s office was required forthwith, to seek Outside Non Conflicted Independent Counsel in any related matters.

Rogers claimed that the Attorney General’s office, nor he, in any capacity, could speak to us until retaining an Independent Non-Conflicted Party to represent them. Rogers, for the first time since the Spitzer Administration in early 2000, took the correct and legal course of action on behalf of the Attorney General’s office. Rogers calling for Independent NON CONFLICTED Counsel and a Special Prosecutor to replace the Attorney General, in the review and investigation of the Iviewit Filed Criminal Complaints and my ongoing Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, and any/all “legally related” lawsuits and proceedings, all further described herein.

I. Summary of Telephone Calls with the new york state Governor and Attorney General Offices Regarding the Criminal Complaints against the Office of the New York Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo, Esq., Eliot Spitzer, Esq., Steven Michael Cohen, Esq., Monica Connell, Esq., et al. acknowledgement of conflicts of interest by the new york attorney general

William Wagener, a reporter and I, made calls to Governor Cuomo’s Office on February 08, 2011 and spoke with Emily Cole, Assistant to Steven Michael Cohen, Secretary to Governor Cuomo, regarding CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS filed against Andrew Cuomo and Steven Michael Cohen. The CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS previously filed with both the Attorney General’s Office and the Governor’s Office on November 19, 2010 for RICO Crimes, Violations of Public Offices and more, the following URL contains a copy of the Criminal Complaint, hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein,

November 19, 2010 Andrew Cuomo, Steven Michael Cohen et al. CRIMINAL COMPLAINT

On February 08, 2011, I informed Emily Cole that her work relation with Steven Michael Cohen, a named party to the Criminal Complaint, posed a Conflict of Interest in her handling any complaint information and asked to be transferred to a non-conflicted party. Despite the obvious Conflict created by her employment by Cohen, Emily Cole proceeded to assert that she would handle finding a non-conflicted party to review the complaints and get back to me in a few days and that she understood the conflicts with Cohen and Cuomo and would be careful to avoid further conflicts.

On April 13-14th 2011[1], seven calls were placed to Governor Cuomo’s office and Attorney General Scheinderman’s office, in order to ascertain the status of the filed Criminal Complaints. Several previous calls went unreturned over two months attempting to reach Emily Cole since the February 08, 2011 call, where she promised to get back to us in a few days. On April 13, 2011, Patrick Hanley[2] and I finally made contact with Emily Cole and requested the current status of the Criminal Complaints to determine if she had found and retained a Non-Conflicted party to investigate and review the Criminal Complaints pursuant to our prior call.

Footnote [1]

[1]February 08, 2011 thru April 14, 2011 calls to New York Governor Cuomo and Attorney General Schneiderman

Footnote [2]

Patrick Hanley is a Personal Assistant to Suzanne McCormick. McCormick filed a Federal Lawsuit against the NY Supreme Court Disciplinary Dept et al. that was “Legally Related” by Judge Shira Scheindlin, SDNY, to a Federal Lawsuit of a New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Department Attorney Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson, further defined at length herein. The Iviewit and Eliot I Bernstein, Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, is also “Legally Related” by Judge Scheindlin to Whistleblower Anderson’s Lawsuit. McCormick and Bernstein individually filed several prior separate disciplinary complaints that involve the same nexus of State Actors/Defendants as identified by Whistleblower Anderson and now all of whom are Defendants in the three lawsuits.

At this point it was learned, upon information and belief, that a one Kenneth Cole of Kenneth Cole Productions ( NYSE: KCP ) and Maria Cuomo Cole (sister to Governor Andrew Cuomo) have a daughter identically named to Steven Cohen’s assistant Emily Cole[3]. Upon confronting Emily Cole of the enormity a Conflict of Interest a direct family relationship would create and requesting verification she was not the Emily Cole related to the Cuomo family, Ms. Cole denied she was the daughter of Kenneth Cole and Maria Cuomo Cole. Later in the call, further questioning Ms. Cole regarding her name, she became defensive and claimed that even if she were their daughter, it was “none of my business and would not matter” or words to that effect. I explained that if she were related to the Cuomo family this further exacerbated the Conflict of Interests in her handling the Criminal Complaint against Andrew Cuomo and Steven Michael Cohen, in addition to the Conflict of Interest already present with her employment by Steven Michael Cohen.

Footnote [3]

[3] “Maria Cuomo Cole and Emily Cole Photostream - Browse all photos of Maria Cuomo Cole and Emily Cole together in this socially oriented mega-slideshow”. URL fully incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

Emily Cole then admitted she had turned the prior request on February 08, 2011 for complaint information, directly over to Steven Michael Cohen, the accused! At this point, I advised Ms. Cole that this represented further egregious illegal Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Violations of Public Office Rules & Regulations and Federal& State Law committed by Cohen and herself. As exhibited herein and in the attached URL exhibits, an incestuous and illegal web of Conflicts of Interest exists wherein lawyers acting in various Government Offices, including but not limited to, Court Officials, Prosecutors, Regulators, Oversight Authorities and Disciplinary Committees, create the glue that binds the Title 18: 1961- 1968 RICO Conspiracy together. The RICO Criminal Organization is defined in detail in my Amended Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit and the attached RICO Statement filed therein. The RICO Organization described is composed mainly of Lawyers and Law Firms acting in conspiracy to commit crimes, including the theft of Iviewit’s Trillion Dollar Patents that changed the digital world, and another set of Lawyers and Law Firms acting inside the Government to cover-up their crimes and deny Due Process to their victims. Cover-ups made possible by a “Revolving Door” that swings between the RICO Criminal Organization Law Firms and Government Agencies, including the Courts. The RICO& ANTITRUST Lawsuit is hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein and is located at the URL,

IVIEWIT RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT.

Emily Cole then became distraught and defensive when notified that her actions were in Conflict and Violations of Law and would be included in any/all ongoing and future Criminal and Civil Lawsuits/Complaints filed, as further acts of Obstruction and more and reported to proper authorities. We then notified Ms. Cole that these actions constituted obvious Conflicts and Aiding and Abetting the Criminal Conspiracy through further Obstruction of Justice, causing further Denial of Due Process and Procedure. Ms. Cole then rudely and abruptly terminated the phone call without further direction.

We immediately called back the Governor’s office, now attempting to reach Benjamin Lawsky, Chief of Staff to Governor Cuomo, in efforts to find a NON-CONFLICTED party to handle the Criminal Complaints filed with the Governor or have the complaints directed to an INDEPENDENT NON CONFLICTED INVESTIGATOR. Moreover, our call was essential to report the newly discovered alleged crimes committed by Emily Cole and Steven M. Cohen, as Ms. Cole admitted to turning over the Complaints to Steven Cohen, her boss, and one of the central Defendants accused in the Criminal Complaints. Further, we sought to have in writing, verification that Emily Cole was not a family/relative of the Cuomo family. The call transferred by the receptionist to Lawsky’s office was intercepted instead directly by Steven Michael Cohen.

Cohen, by intercepting the call, now further acted in a continued plethora of Conflicts of Interest, again Violating Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law, by personally handling Criminal Complaint matters against him. After noticing Cohen of his conflicts and the fact that I was attempting to “PUT HIM IN PRISON…”[4] in my RICO & ANTITRUST Federal Lawsuit, Cohen proceeded to attempt to deflect the Complaints filed with the Governor, to the New York Attorney General and a one Harlan Levy, Chief of Staff to New York Attorney General, Eric T. Schneiderman. Cohen attempted this transfer of the Governor’s legal obligations to the Attorney General despite notice that the Attorney General had a separate Criminal Complaint filed with their office and that the Governor was being requested to execute his executive authorities in the Criminal matters, which could only be executed by the Governor. According to Cohen, Levy is the immediate successor to Cohen’s former position as Chief of Staff to Cuomo when Cuomo was Attorney General. At this point it appeared that the Governor of New York Cuomo was unwilling to discharge his Executive Duties as Governor and also was unwilling to turn the matter over to a Non Conflicted party in the Governor’s office for review. Further, the Governor’s office was refusing to enlist a Non Conflicted party to take action on behalf of the Governor of New York, in a situation where Conflicts of Interest precluded his direct involvement.

Footnote [4]

Cohen ironically responded to the fact that I was attempting to “Put him in Prison” by retorting, “Some would say I already am in Prison” at which point I responded “I agree”.

Cohen, is well aware of the Criminal Complaints filed against both he and Cuomo and has been directly handling them for several years, as exhibited in all of the following numbered URL’s, all fully incorporated by reference in entirety herein,

1.

November 30, 2010 Intellectual Property news in Palm Beach, Florida, United States of America, Free-Press-Release, Inc. “Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein Files Criminal Charges Against NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Chief of Staff Steven Michael Cohen & Asst Attorney General Monica Connell w/ Gov David Paterson & NY Senate Judiciary Chair John Sampson.”

Multiple Criminal Complaints were filed with Andrew Cuomo while serving as Attorney General, and to my knowledge, nothing was done but to further Obstruct the Complaints or dismiss them without investigation. The Attorney General’s office has Illegally Obstructed numerous previous Criminal Complaints of Iviewit and Eliot Bernstein, dating back to filed Complaints with Eliot Spitzer as Attorney General, then as Governor as early as 2004. With continued Conflicts, illegal acts continue to ensue despite the repeated demand from the outset that if Conflicts existed, the Complaints required being turned over to a Non-Conflicted Independent Party. All parties were requested to sign Conflict of Interest Disclosure Forms and not a single party has prior to making decisions. If there are no Conflicts of Interest, one should have no problem signing and returning the Conflict of Interest Disclosure and no proceedings are legally valid when Conflicts are concealed.

2.

June 13th 2009, letter to Steven Michael Cohen regarding“Conflicts of Interest; etc; Bernstein v. NYS First Department et al.; US Second Circuit Docket No. 08-4873-CV.”

3.

June 18th 2009 letter to Steven Michael Cohen regarding “First Department Obstruction of Justice.” The letter deals with First Department Officials acting in blatant Conflicts of Interest, including but not limited to, handling complaints they are named Defendants in, and other matters relating to Criminal Misconduct of P. Stephen Lamont.

The most recent Criminal Complaints against Cohen and Cuomo, both named as Defendants in the Criminal Complaints, yet continue to be directly involved in processing the Complaints, comprise the integrity of any actions taken to this point, actions which are in Violation of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law. Cohen has personally handled the Complaints while serving under Cuomo at the Attorney General’s office and now at the Governor’s office. Unequivocally, Cohen and Cuomo’s failure to turn over the Criminal Complaints to a Non-Conflicted Independent Party and remove themselves from the Conflicts, since June 13 2009, orprovide any response at all, adds further Criminal Acts to these matters, which will soon be reported, as soon as, a Non Conflicted party is in place to report them to. A tendered response by either Cohen or Cuomo, or even at this point the Governor or Attorney General’s offices, as the Governor and now the Attorney General and their employees evinces gross conflicts, as further evidenced herein and in exhibits, is worthless, other than as Prima Facie Evidence of further Criminal Misconduct. Cuomo and Cohen instead have elected to Conceal the Complaints and Derail the Investigations, further Aiding and Abetting the RICO Conspiracy by further Obstructing Justice in Federal and State Proceedings, through intentional failure to perform their “Honest Services” and Public Office Duties by intentionally and with scienter Violating Attorney Conduct Codes, Violating Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law.

Additional Illegal Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, arise from the fact that the Attorney General’s Office, and Officials from that office, are also named directly as State Actors/Defendants in my Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. The fact that they are State/Actor Defendants in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit makes it virtually impossible for them to review Criminal Complaints in matters directly related to the very same nexus of events, yet they continue directly acting in efforts to derail the investigations.

The Conflict Swamp further thickens, when taking into account Conflicts created by the Attorney General’s additional role as Legal Counsel for State Actors/Defendants in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. The Attorney General’s Office is not only representing their own offices and employees in conflict, but also, illegally representing 39 PLUS State Actors/Defendants as counsel of record, in further Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, and yet, still directly handle Criminal Complaints naming them as central Criminal RICO Actors. Additional Conflicts of Interest are further created by the illegal twofold representation by the Attorney General of the State Actors/Defendants in both a Professional and Personal capacity. The Attorney General may represent State Actors/Defendants in Lawsuits in a PROFESSIONAL capacity only on the State of New York’s funds and the Individual representations are illegal and further Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, further defined herein. This entire bizarre and convoluted myriad of ILLEGAL Conflicts of Interest and Obstructions create further massive Frauds on the Courts and Frauds on a Multiplicity of Government Agencies, all combining to further illegally deny Due Process and Obstruct Justice.

On April 14, 2011, a call was made to Harlan Levy, which was intercepted, or transferred, to a one, James Rogers, Esq. ~ Special Counsel and Senior Advisor to Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, to inform and advise Mr. Rogers that;

1. the Attorney General’s office under Cuomo and now Schneiderman had previously received Criminal Complaints against Andrew Cuomo and Steven M. Cohen and failed to find Non Conflicted Independent Counsel to handle the complaints, while simultaneously representing as Counsel of Record, their offices and 39 plus State Actors/Defendants in my Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

2. the Attorney General’s office and two former Attorney General’s, Spitzer and Cuomo, are State Actors/Defendants in the Iviewit RICO& ANTITRUST Lawsuit, acting as central players in the Public Office Cover-Ups alleged therein.

3. the Attorney General is representing the Attorney General’s office and two former Attorney General’s while having further multiple Conflicts of Interests Representing other State Actors/Defendants in the RICO& ANTITRUST Lawsuit. That this sets up Obstruction of Justice charges, as officials of the Attorney General’s office have failed to perform their Public Office duties to investigate the CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against the Public Officials through the Attorney General’s Public Integrity Unit charged with investigating CORRUPT PUBLIC OFFICIALS in New York. That instead the Attorney General’s office shields their State Actors/Defendants clients from investigations. In the event the Attorney General is Conflicted from investigating certain Public Officials, for example, when Representing State Actors/Defendants, as Counsel of Record in a Lawsuit, as is the case in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, the Attorney General must then call in an Independent Special Prosecutor/Investigator in order to Investigate the Attorney General’s clients, the State Actors/Defendants.[5] This is due to the Obvious Conflict caused if their offices tried to investigate the State Actors/Defendants they represent in the same matter. In fact, the Attorney General in this instance must call in someone else to investigate for certainly they cannot investigate themselves. Yet, up to this point, the Attorney General has failed to call in anyone and merely Obstructed Justice.

Footnote [5]

[5]New York State Public Officers Law § 17 Sec 2 (b) - New York State Public Officers Law. § 17. 2 (b) Subject to the conditions set forth in paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the employee shall be entitled to be represented by the attorney general, provided, however, that the employee shall be entitled to representation by private counsel of his choice in any civil judicial proceeding whenever the attorney general determines based upon his investigation and review of the facts and circumstances of the case that representation by the attorney general would be inappropriate, or whenever a court of competent jurisdiction, upon appropriate motion or by a special proceeding, determines that a conflict of interest exists and that the employee is entitled to be represented by private counsel of his choice.

4. the former Attorney Generals Spitzer and Cuomo, the Attorney General’s Office, the Governors Offices of Spitzer and Cuomo are also the accused actors in the Criminal Complaints filed with both Offices and thus CANNOT INVESTIGATE THEMSELVES and MUST TURN OVER THE COMPLAINTS TO A SPECIAL PROSECUTOR IMMEDIATELY. The failure to turn the CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS over to a NON CONFLICTED INDEPENDENT PROSECUTOR acts further to Obstruct Justice with Scienter, by shielding the Attorney General’s and their co-conspirators from investigations, through direct involvement in derailing the Criminal Complaints against themselves and others, thereby aiding and abetting the Criminal RICO Organization defined in the Amended Complaint.

After being advised of the material facts, especially as they relate to the Attorney General’s Conflicts of Interest in handling the matters directly, Rogers then declared a Conflict of Interest existed with him and the Attorney General Office. This Admission and Acknowledgement of ongoing conflicts now requires the Attorney General’s office to seek Independent Counsel in these matters to review the Criminal Complaints and determine whom the Complaints and Investigations should be turned over to.

Due to the number of Conflicts, it appears impossible for either the Attorney General or Governor’s Office now to review the FILED CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS against Cohen, Cuomo et al. and Mr. Rogers did the first step in the right direction by admitting and affirming existing Conflicts Of Interest and the need for INDEPENDENT NON CONFLICTED Counsel going forward. Immediately after declaring Conflicts of Interest existed, Mr. Rogers refused to discuss the CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS or anything further until retaining NON CONFLICTED OUTSIDE COUNSEL, as the Conflicts acknowledged were impossible to overcome.

First, I must applaud Mr. Rogers, for he is one of the very few people in over a decade that has handled the Complaints appropriately and navigated the existing WEB OF CONFLICTS in the CONFLICT SWAMP, ethically. Bravo Mr. Rogers! Perhaps “The Buck Stops Here”.

II. The new york supreme court attorney Whistleblower, christine c. Anderson’s federal Lawsuit and the “Legally Related” Federal Lawsuits blow open a massive corruption of senior ranking new york and us government officials, exposing The “revolving door” of public office corruption and mandating investigations.

Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin “legally related” my TRILLION DOLLAR[6] RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit to that of an inside New York Supreme Court Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson, a veteran Senior Staff Attorney in the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Department. Anderson has blown the Whistle on a mass of Public Office Corruption, under Sworn Oath in an open Federal Court and made similar claims before the New York Senate Judiciary Committee[7] in an ONGOING investigation by that Committee. Anderson’s testimony rips open a mob styled conspiratorial ring operating inside State and Federal Government Agencies, at the highest levels, exposing illegal Patterns and Practices of LEADING PUBLIC OFFICIALS, ALL WITH LEGAL DEGREES, operating in concert to Violate Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations, Judicial Cannons and State, Federal & International Law, in efforts to facilitate cover-ups of various crimes. Various crimes committed by ATTORNEYS AT LAW in private practice, mainly ILLEGAL LEGAL CRIMES that are then complained of to Prosecutors and Disciplinary Agencies by the victims. Instead of Due Process and Procedure, victims meet another layer of corruption. What appears is a “playbook” of “cookie cutter” illegal legal crimes used by these Law Firms and Lawyers to steal inventions, steal estates [8] and more, and then another “playbook” of government cover-up crimes to stop any complaints against them, as exhibited in the “Legally Related”Lawsuits to Anderson, further enumerated herein.

Footnote [6]

State of New York Bond Holders, Liability Carriers, Auditors and other parties with “interest”, should be immediately noticed of the MASSIVE LIABILITY that may have been concealed over the last several years from all “interested”parties. The Conflicts of Interest and other Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, may have precluded proper reporting of this 12 TRILLION DOLLAR LIABILITY, as the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit is 12 Counts, each for 1 Trillion Dollars in Damages.

Footnote [7]

New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings June 08, 2009

Public Hearing: Standing Committee on the Judiciary New York Senate Judiciary Committee, John L. Sampson, Chairman. SUBJECT: The Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct. PURPOSE: This hearing will review the mission, procedures and level of public satisfaction with the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts as well as the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct.

June 08, 2009 New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing Anderson Testimony Video

Monday, September 21, 2009, Christine C. Anderson Letter “Re: Request for Federal Investigation Into Allegations of Corruption and Witness Intimidation and Appointment of Federal Monitor” addressed to all of the following parties;

The Hon. Eric H. Holder, Jr., Attorney General of the United States Office of the Attorney General

The Hon. Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York United States Department of Justice

The Hon. William M. Welch II, Chief, Public Integrity Unit United States Department of Justice

The Hon. John L. Sampson, Chairman, New York State Senate Judiciary Committee can be found at the following URL,

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=114

fully incorporated in entirety by reference herein.

June 08, 2009 New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing Transcript

fully incorporated in entirety by reference herein.

September 24, 2009 Judiciary Committee Hearing Transcript

fully incorporated in entirety by reference herein.

September 24, 2009 Judiciary Committee Hearing Eliot Bernstein Testimony Video

fully incorporated in entirety by reference herein.

**Note that Senator Sampson honorably admits Conflict of Interest with the Main Defendant, his former employer Proskauer Rose, in the opening.

September 24, 2009 Judiciary Committee Hearing Suzanne McCormick/Patrick Hanley Testimony Video

Footnote [8]“Elder abuse, neglect rampant in US” Mike Kellerman, Press TV, Washington, May 9, 2011

Anderson further puts forth a damning sworn statement to the New York State Judiciary Committee Chairman, John Sampson, containing allegations of FELONY Criminal Acts [9] by STATE & FEDERAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS. The Criminal Acts include but are not limited to, Alteration & Destruction of Official Court & Prosecutorial Records, Destruction of Evidence in Federal & State Criminal & Civil Official Proceedings, Extorting and Threatening a Federal Witness[10] in a Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit, Whitewashing Attorney Disciplinary Complaints, Obstructions of Justice and more. The Anderson sworn statement to the Judiciary Committee and others, includes but is not limited to, the following statement, quote,

On June 8, 2009, I testified at a hearing convened by John L. Sampson, New York State Senator and Chairman of the New York State Standing Committee On The Judiciary. (A copy of my affidavit submitted to the Committee is attached hereto as Exhibit B.) At that hearing, several witnesses testified as to their shocking experiences with the grievance and judiciary committees in New York State. Shockingly, within days of my testimony, in my lawsuit, my sealed medical and psychiatric records were filed and posted publicly on the court’s Internet filing system by counsel for the defendants – i.e., the New York State Attorney General’s Office. I regard those actions as horrifically unethical and malicious, and taken in deliberate retaliation for my testifying at the Senate hearing.

The detailed testimony presented by innumerable witnesses at the June 8th Senate hearing reveals the manifold reports of corruption and abuse by the State’s Disciplinary Committees. (A copy of the transcript of this hearing is attached hereto as Exhibit C.) Charges included concealment of evidence, obstruction of justice, extortionate sexual threats by attorneys, pilfering of estates by attorneys, abuse of power, fraud, conspiracy and repeated violations of state and federal constitutional rights.”

Footnote [9]“Notice of Conflict Filings at the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals” by Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox

Footnote [10]

A one Nicole Corrado, another Veteran New York Supreme Court Senior Staff Attorney in the New York Supreme Court Disciplinary Department who was being deposed in Anderson’s Whistleblower Lawsuit when threatened by a Senior New York Supreme Court Official.

The Violations of Law were exposed directly by Anderson to the New York Senate Judiciary Committee in the hearings, Richard Kuse/Catherine Wilson, The Honorable Duane A. Hart, Gizella Weisshaus[11], Patrick Hanley/Suzanne McCormick and others[12] also testified at the hearings. Evidence continues to be circulated and copied to each individual member of the Committee, including then Senator Eric T. Schneiderman the current New York Attorney General, by those who testified at the hearings, as investigations by that Committee continue. Again, Anderson made similar claims under oath in open court before Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin and therefore there can be no way that Prosecutors can fail to investigate these allegations from a credible Whistleblower eyewitness willing to testify under oath.

Footnote [11]“Patentgate Ethics Scam Hits Holocaust Survivor…” Expose Corrupt Courts Blogspot, Frank Brady aka Kevin McKeown

Footnote [12]New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings Video

and

New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings Video 2

The Criminals Anderson fingered infect the entire legal/prosecutorial communities, showing a “Revolving Door” including at the highest posts of Public Office, including but not limited to, State & Federal Court Officials, State & Federal Prosecutorial Officials, State Regulatory Officials and certain corrupt “Favored Law Firms and Lawyers.” Anderson further stated in open Court during trial that a “CLEANER” exists inside the Ethics Department of the New York Supreme Court, the highest post for Attorney Regulation, named Naomi F. Goldstein, Esq. Deputy Chief Counsel of the New York Supreme Court. Yes, you heard correctly, a “Cleaner” within the New York Supreme Court’s ethics department! Ironically, John Gotti was tried upstairs in a separate action in the same courthouse, at the same time that Anderson was testifying in her proceeding, and Gotti’s mob trial did not even report having a “Cleaner.”

Goldstein, the “Cleaner,” Anderson exposes, with the aid of other senior ranking New York Supreme Court Officials, District Attorneys, US Attorneys and “Favored Law Firms and Lawyers” WHITEWASHED Attorney Disciplinary Complaints, Altered & Destroyed Official Court & Prosecutorial Records and Evidence and more, on behalf of other “US ATTORNEYS, DA’s, ADA’s and FAVORED LAW FIRMS & LAWYERS”. OUTRAGEOUS! The gang of criminals creating an impenetrable wall of corruption, protected by the very people elected to stop corruption, and, opening a Pandora’s Box to further unregulated crime. Once the portal was opened it has led from one crime to another, bigger and bigger, including the Mortgage/Subprime Frauds and Financial Frauds rampant on Wall Street recently, all committed by Lawyers fearing no retribution from the Law with their Lawyer/Accomplices inside Government, there to derail any investigations, as further evidenced herein. Note that the same New York Supreme Court Department that Anderson worked for with Nicole Corrado is the department responsible for regulating Wall Street attorneys along with the Attorney General, as further discussed herein.

Anderson further complains to the Federal Court in a Motion to Remove the Attorney General[13] from illegal legal representations that CUOMO IS ILLEGALLY REPRESENTING STATE ACTORS/DEFENDANTSin both the US District Court for the Southern District of New York and the Second Circuit Court of Appeals, in her case and the “legally related” cases. Anderson filed to remove the Attorney General from her Whistleblower Lawsuit for ILLEGAL Conflicts of Interest and other Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State& Federal Law, illustrating a further Pattern and Practice of Public Corruption designed to evade prosecution.

Footnote [13]

Anderson’s Motion to Remove the Attorney General can be found at the following URL’s and Anderson’s arguments for removing the Attorney General in that Motion and her Lawsuit are hereby fully incorporated by reference as my own arguments in this letter, where they are applicable to our “legally related” lawsuits.

“Wednesday, September 15, 2010 “Anderson Moves to Disqualify NY Attorney General”

Anderson’s allegations are almost identical to those claimed in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit about Public Officers violating Law. For years prior to having any knowledge of the inside mechanics of how the crimes operated from Anderson, I complained about these Public Officials and their crimes involving members of the SAME department Anderson and Corrado worked for, the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. Without Anderson’s revelations however, I was unable to tie how the various departments operated together in a neat conspiratorial Criminal RICO Organization. Once exposed to the mechanics of the crimes from the perspective of an inside Whistleblower, it becomes apparent that a Criminal Conspiracy beyond imagination exists, blocking Due Process and Procedure to Obstruct Justice to Victims of the Criminal Enterprise’s ILLEGAL LEGAL crimes, then misusing Public Offices to bury any complaints against them.

The CRIMINAL ACTS described by Anderson herein are NOT part of a“Conspiracy Theory,” but instead comprise aFACTUAL LEGAL CONSPIRACY, steeped in Factual Damning Evidence. The difference between “Conspiracy Theory” and Factual Legal Conspiracy is that “Conspiracy Theories” are merely theories and Legal Factual Criminal Conspiracies come with very real PRISON SENTENCES at the end of a trial, if one is guilty, in some instances, the end of a rope. A list of the crimes alleged by Anderson, alleged in the Iviewit Criminal Complaints and contained in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, committed by Senior Public Officials, include but are far from limited to, the crimes listed inExhibit 2 of this document and listed at the URL,

STATE FEDERAL & INTERNATIONAL LAWS VIOLATED - IVIEWIT RICO & ANTITRUST fully incorporated in entirety by reference herein.

So Powerful it Blew Up Three Cars Next to It, Where's the Hood?

So Powerful it Blew Up Three Cars Next to It, Where's the Hood?

The crimes include a Car Bombing in an Attempted Murder of my Family in Boynton Beach Florida, for graphic detail and further information on the Car Bombing see the Iviewit companies’ homepage at www.iviewit.tv, which also has links for several thousands of pieces of supplemental evidence in these matters. ALL SUPPLEMENTAL EVIDENTIARY MATERIALS and LINKS ON THE IVIEWIT HOMEPAGE ( currently 1087 exhibits, seehttp://www.iviewit.tv/#Evidence ), are hereby incorporated by reference in their entirety herein.

On October 27 2009, after Anderson’s trial and learning the shocking STATE& FEDERAL FELONY CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICES, ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES and STATE & FEDERAL LAW committed by Government Attorneys and Law Firms, eyewitnesses to Anderson’s CRIMINAL allegations in court, Eliot Bernstein and Terrence Finnan, sent Notice to Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin of her obligations under law. The Letter/Notice to Scheindlin demanded that Scheindlin follow her Judicial Cannons and Law and report the CRIMINAL allegations, of not only a credible witness, but also an expert witness, Anderson, to the proper authorities.

Authorities for Scheindlin to notify, include but are not limited to, the New York Attorney General’s Office, the United States Attorney General, the United States Attorney General Office of Professional Responsibility, the New York District Attorney, the United States Department of Justice Inspector General, the New York Supreme Court Oversights, and, all offices specifically fingered by Anderson. Notice to begin IMMEDIATE CRIMINAL & INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGATIONS of the CRIMINAL allegations levied by Anderson against Senior Public Officials in the government agencies.

Further, a copy of the Scheindlin letter and corresponding Criminal Complaint information, additionally requesting to add the new material to ongoing Iviewit Complaints and begin further new investigations of the new Criminal Acts exposed, was sent to the following State, Federal & International Authorities investigating the Iviewit complaint matters;

1. The Honorable Barack Hussein Obama II
President United States of America

2. The Honorable Glenn A. Fine
Inspector General United States Department of Justice

3. The Honorable John Conyers Jr.
Chairman House Judiciary Committee

4. The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein
Senate Judiciary Committee

5. Hon. Eric H. Holder, Jr.
United States Attorney General US Department of Justice

6. The Honorable Elena Kagan
Solicitor General US Department of Justice

7. Robert S. Mueller, III.
Director Federal Bureau of Investigation

8. Candice M. Will
Assistant Director, Office of Professional Responsibility Federal Bureau of Investigation

9. The Honorable Harry I. Moatz
Director, Office of Enrollment & Discipline United States Patent & Trademark Office

10. Todd J. Zinser
Inspector General United States Department of Commerce

11. David Kappos
Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office United States Patent & Trademark Office

12. John J. Doll
Commissioner for Patents United States Patent and Trademark Office

13. David L. Gouvaia
Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration

14. Mary L. Schapiro
Chairperson United States Securities and Exchange Commission

15. Peter L. McClintock
Acting Inspector General Small Business Administration

16. Chris P. Mercer
President Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office (epi)

17. Steven Michael Cohen
Counselor and Chief of Staff for Andrew Cuomo New York Office of the Attorney General

18. Joseph M. Demarest, Jr.
FBI Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Division

19. David A. Paterson
Governor New York State

20. New York Senate Judiciary Committee Members:

21. sampson@senate.state.ny.us, onorato@senate.state.ny.us, schneiderman@schneiderman.org, schneiderman@senate.state.ny.us, hassellt@senate.state.ny.us, diaz@senate.state.ny.us, jdklein@senate.state.ny.us, eadams@senate.state.ny.us, espada@senate.state.ny.us, breslin@senate.state.ny.us, dilan@senate.state.ny.us, savino@senate.state.ny.us, perkins@senate.state.ny.us, maziarz@senate.state.ny.us, jdefranc@senate.state.ny.us, volker@senate.state.ny.us, saland@senate.state.ny.us, lavalle@senate.state.ny.us, bonacic@senate.state.ny.us, winner@senate.state.ny.us, nozzolio@senate.state.ny.us, lanza@senate.state.ny.us, ranz@senate.state.ny.us, spotts@senate.state.ny.us.

22. Hon. Andrew Cuomo
Attorney General Office of the Attorney General

23. Monica Connell, Esq.
Assistant Attorney General - Division of State Counsel Litigation Bureau, State of New York Office of the Attorney General

24. Thomas P. DiNapoli
Comptroller State of New York

25. Robert Morris Morgenthau
District Attorney of New York County

The Notice to Shira Scheindlin and others of the Criminal Whistleblowing Felony Allegations levied by Christine Anderson, demand that the Noticed Parties make formal docketed complaints of the matters and/or do their legal duty to report these alleged Felony Crimes to proper authorities or face Misprision of a Felony Charges and more. The Notice to Scheindlin can be found at the following URL, hereby incorporated in entirety by reference herein,

“IVIEWIT LETTER TO US FEDERAL JUDGE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN RE: CRIMINAL “WHISTLEBLOWER” ALLEGATIONS in Christine C. Anderson v. New York State et al. Docket 07cv09599 alleging Disciplinary Complaint Fixing by the “CLEANER”for US Attorneys, New York District Attorneys and ADA’s; Code of Conduct for US Judges Canon 3B(5), Protecting the People.”
Anderson’s Letter Titled, “Re: CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS in Christine C. Anderson v. New York State et al. (07cv09599); Code of Conduct for US Judges Canon 3B(5), Protecting the People.”
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=205

The New York Attorney General’s Office, Andrew Cuomo (while he was Attorney General and as Governor) and Steven Cohen, are fully and intimately cognizant of Anderson’s FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS in OPEN FEDERAL COURT before Judge Scheindlin. FELONY CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS against ATTORNEYSworking for Government Agencies, including but not limited to, the US ATTORNEY, the DA, the ADA and the New York Supreme Court, as the New York Attorney General was ACTING COUNSEL to Anderson’s State Actors/Defendants and therefore the Attorney General’s Office was factually present in Court at the time Anderson levied the Criminal Allegations.

Once cognizant of the alleged crimes, the Attorney General’s Office, while acting as Counsel of Record for the Anderson State Actors/Defendants, including but not limited to, Assistant Attorney Generals’ Lee Alan Adlerstein (present in the Courtroom), Wesley Eugene Bauman, Esq., Monica Wagener and Monica Connell, had no plausible deniability of the CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS levied under oath in federal court by Anderson. They are therefore legally obligated in their OFFICIAL CAPACITIES to report and/or investigate RELIABLE CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS, as mandated by the New York Lawyer’s Code of Professional Responsibility, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Laws, especially where Public Offices are involved in the crimes. Several sections of code regarding these duties to report, include but are not limited to;

· DR 1-103 [1200.4] Disclosure of Information to Authorities.
A lawyer possessing knowledge, (1) not protected as a confidence or secret, or (2) not gained in the lawyer’s capacity as a member of a bona fide lawyer assistance or similar program or committee, of a violation of DR 1-102 [1200.3] that raises a substantial question as to another lawyer’s honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer shall report such knowledge to a tribunal or other authority empowered to investigate or act upon such violation.

Attorneys are officers of the court, Clark v. United States, 289 U.S. 1, 12, 53 S.Ct. 465, 468, 77 L.Ed. 993 (1933), and are obligated to adhere to all applicable disciplinary rules, and to report incidents of which they have unprivileged knowledge involving violations of a disciplinary rule. ABA Code of Professional Responsibility, DR 1-102(A), 1-103(A); see In re Walker, 87 A.D.2d 555, 560,448 N.Y.S.2d 474, 479 (1st Dep’t 1982) (as officers of the court, attorneys are required to notify parties and the court of errors including conflicts of interest).

· TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 1 § 4 Misprision of felony

Whoever, having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of the United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to some judge or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.

The revised Code of Conduct[14] for Judges also binds Scheindlin to report these allegations to the proper authorities under,

· CANON 3 A JUDGE SHOULD PERFORM THE DUTIES OF THE OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY
B. Administrative Responsibilities.

(3) A judge should initiate appropriate action when the judge becomes aware of reliable evidence indicating the likelihood of unprofessional conduct by a judge or lawyer.

COMMENTARY

Canon 3B(3). Appropriate action may include direct communication with the judge or lawyer who has committed the violation, other direct action if available, and reporting the violation to the appropriate authorities.

Footnote [14]

Note that this language cited comes from a revised Code of Conduct on July 01, 2009. The Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit and the Anderson Whistleblowing Lawsuit, involve allegations of CORRUPTION against Senior Ranking Court Officials and Public Officials dating back to 1997. These same individuals involved in those Lawsuits are many of those directly in charge of State & National Lawyer Disciplinary Departments and Bar Associations. The same individuals also directly create codes of conduct and law, both State & Federal, mandating that Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law codified prior to1997 be used in investigating these matters and determining any outcome. This“grandfathering” of the law and codes to the time of the crimes will insure that the State Actors/Defendants did not and are not now intentionally changing codes in order to create loopholes by watering down the codes to fit their crimes. Evidence of using code NOT codified, in order to illegally exculpate State Actors/Defendants in Bar & Disciplinary Complaints, has already been submitted to the courts and investigators. This establishes another illegal Pattern and Practice, which show previous attempts by named State Actors/Defendants in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit to change Disciplinary Codes to fit their crimes, using falsified un-codified codes to form dismissal letters to feather the caps of their criminal conspirators. See URL incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

III. ACTIONS TO REMOVE ADMITTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED CONFLICTS OF INTEREST FROM ALL PROCEEDINGS AND CEASE AND DESIST ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS OF STATE ACTORS/DEFENDANTS BY THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL

As Anderson’s Motion to Disqualify the Attorney General’s Office shows, there are Conflicts of Interest inherent in the ILLEGAL legal representations of the Public Officers both personally and professionally by the New York Attorney General’s office, which preclude such representations. Therefore, since the conflicted representations are in Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, all instances of these illegal representations must instantly Cease and Desist, and proper remedial actions taken.

First, all State Actors/Defendants illegally represented currently by the Attorney General, now must be replaced with Non-Conflicted Independent Counsel, separate counsel for both their Professional and Individual Legal Defenses where they are sued in both capacities. In particular, Anderson claims, quote,

“Ongoing Conflict of Interest

Representation by the New York Attorney General’s office in the pending appeal continues the improper prejudice against plaintiff. Furthermore, not only did the Attorney General’s representation of the defendants unduly prejudice the plaintiff, but it also raised serious conflict of interest issues with respect to the defendants themselves. To protect their own rights, each of the defendants had to have their own attorneys in order to permit them to cross claim or make admissions, including their own right to protect their own individual rights in this appeal. Under New York State and federal conflict of interest rules, each of the defendants must be free to undertake these independent actions. To do so, they must have their own counsel. (See NYS Code of Professional Conduct Cannon 5 Conflict of Interest Rules.[15]) The Attorney General as a state attorney is bound by these rules as well.[16]

This constitutes New York State law, and the attorney who violates these safeguards must be immediately removed from the case. Further, should the defendants seek to waive the conflicts they would have to submit an affidavit to that effect to the court.

Notwithstanding a defendant’s attempt to waive his right to independent counsel, the court can deny the waiver, based on a finding that ultimately this conflict cannot properly be waived.

The trail [sic trial] court improperly ignored the obligation to address the inherent conflict up to and including the trial. This court, however, must now disqualify the Attorney General from any representation of the defendants.

As a result of these conflict of interest issues, the Attorney General cannot properly represent the defendants, either as a group or individually, in these appellate proceedings. Each defendant must have the right to advance his or her own position on appeal, to cross claim against the others, and to bring a counterclaim against the State.

These actions most certainly could not be undertaken in a case where the Attorney General represents all the named defendants. All defendants clearly are in conflict with each other, especially in their individual capacities. Without question, the Attorney General violated its ethical rules and the public trust in undertaking to represent all of the defendants. The Attorney General continues to violate its ethical rules by appearing before this appellate body.

This would be the case, even were it established that the defendants had sought to consent to such representation…

The conflict here is particularly acute given the nature of the claims brought by plaintiff Anderson. Plaintiff’s charges warranted an independent investigation by the New York State Attorney General’s office to review the basic claims given that Anderson was formerly a Departmental Disciplinary Committee staff attorney with considerable experience and over the years received excellent evaluations. The fact is that these are not allegations from a lay person.

While at the DDC, Plaintiff Anderson was charged with investigating cases involving possible criminal and civil misconduct by attorneys. She carried out her duties as a duly authorized officer of the Court. The New York State Attorney General’s Office was therefore obligated to protect her and to investigate her claims of serious misconduct against the named parties. To the Contrary, the New York State Attorney General’s Office failed to do so.

The Attorney General is a publicly funded arm of the State. It was conflicted from the outset of this case because it could not possibly defend any of the defendants, while simultaneously investigating plaintiff’s claims of serious ongoing misconduct by the defendants. Indeed, no explanation has ever been provided as to why the Attorney General did not represent plaintiff Anderson against any of the original defendants. This was itself a misappropriation of public funds by a state investigative agency with prosecution powers.

Federal law mandates that a special prosecutor be substituted into the case, and this was not done.”

Footnotes from Anderson filing

Footnote [15]

Conflict of Interest Disciplinary Rule 5

Footnote [16]As head of the Department of Law, the Attorney General is both the “People’s Lawyer” and the State’s chief legal officer. As the “People’s Lawyer,” the Attorney General serves as the guardian of the legal rights of the citizens of New York, its organizations and its natural resources. In his role as the State’s chief legal counsel, the Attorney General not only advises the Executive Branch of Slate government, but also defends actions and proceedings on behalf of the State.

Similar to Anderson, in my RICO & ANTITRUST lawsuit, the Attorney General not only represents 39 plus State Actors/Defendants ILLEGALLY, both personally and professionally, but also acts as in further conflict as Counsel for their own offices and former employees, in both the US District Court and Second Circuit Court of Appeals. Evidence of such representations can be found in the Attorney General’s response to the Amended Complaint in US District Court, which was GRANTED & DOCKETED by Judge Scheindlin in the following Order, included by reference in entirety herein, SCHEINDLIN ORDER GRANTING THE AMENDED COMPLAINT

The Amended Complaint was responded to ILLEGALLY by the Attorney General’s Office, whom was wearing a number of conflicting hats, acting as both a State Actor/Defendant and Defense Counsel to other State Actor/Defendants, all represented ILLEGALLY both Professionally and in their Individual capacities. Once again, a further bizarre and illegal myriad of Conflicts of Interest exposed, again in Violation of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Offices Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, combining to further Block Due Process & Procedure of the victims through Obstruction Justice to both the Criminal Complaints and the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

A further Conflict arises in that both the Cuomo Administration and the Spitzer Administration dismissed Iviewit Complaints after review, with no formal investigation, EVEN AFTER HAVING ALLEGATIONS FROM A NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY WHISTLEBLOWER, yet then turned around to represent many of the same State Actor/Defendants. Clearly, this conflict of interest is insurmountable for the Attorney General after having reviewed the Criminal Complaint information and acting upon it and then turning around and representing against Iviewit in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit involving the same corpus of information and State Actor/Defendants. This further poses additional massive Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Public Office Rules & Regulations, Attorney Conduct Codes and State & Federal Law.

Upon the forced resignation of Spitzer as Governor, for Violations of the Federal Mann Act in Transporting Prostitutes across State Lines, Prostitution of a Young Woman and other crimes, Spitzer’s Personal legal fees were paid from the Public Treasury to Proskauer Rose[17], the central conspirator of my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, named in EVERY Criminal and Civil Complaint. So “good”were these lawyers that Spitzer never went to trial, or faced arrest, almost as if he were “Above the Law,” or more appropriately, the crimes were bought off on the Taxpayer’s dime and then “Whitewashed” by his friends in high places, perhaps similar to what Anderson described. Again, it is almost too bizarre that Proskauer represented Spitzer officially during the time the Iviewit Complaints were active and the Conflicts of Interest caused by this relationship between Proskauer and the Attorney General were NOT acknowledged prior or during the Attorney General’s representing the 39 plus State Actor/Defendants in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit or while investigating Proskauer, the main culprit in the Criminal Complaints “[18],[19],[20] and [21].

Footnote [17]

“Spitzer hiring city lawyer on taxpayer expense in Troopergate” BY JOE MAHONEY DAILY NEWS ALBANY BUREAU CHIEF Saturday, October 13th 2007

Footnote [18]

“Spitzer’s mouthpiece has his own secrets to hide” March 18, 2008 by Peter Lance, Raw Story

Footnote [19]

“What’s Happened to the Lawyers Who Worked for Spitzer?” By ELLEN ROSEN Published: May 18, 2007, The New York Times

Footnote [20]

“Spitzer Troopergate Subpoenas Still Stand, Judge Told (Update1)” By Karen Freifeld - March 13, 2008, Bloomberg L.P.

Footnote [21]

Insurance Noir - Private eyes – Eliot’s (Small) World, by Neil Weinberg and Michael Maiello, November 29, 2004 Forbes Magazine

In the Bloomberg article in the last footnote, it should be noted that Dietrich Snell, of Spitzer’s Attorney General team, left the Attorney General’s office when Spitzer became Governor and went on to Proskauer Rose for INSTANT PARTNERSHIP. Proskauer/Schnell then went on to represent Governor Spitzer in his TROOPERGATE scandal involving Joe Bruno. This series of events shows the Revolving Door” the Law Firm Proskauer has created in the Attorney General’s Office and the Governor of New York’s Office, giving Proskauer inside information to complaints filed with these offices against them and legal control over those offices. Proskauer, the main and initial Criminal Conspirator in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, also ILLEGALLY represents their firm and themselves in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, as if, like the Attorney General and Governor, Proskauer cannot obtain NON CONFLICTED INDEPENDENT counsel to represent them. Proskauer most likely cannot get Independent counsel to represent them that would continue the Frauds on the Court.

Now, one can see the reason for the never-ending insipid Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law, necessary to derail the complaint matters, the Conflicts being the “Glue that Binds” the crimes and prevents prosecution, precluding Fair & Impartial Due Process and Procedure under Law to the victims. Of interest to note, is that Proskauer, almost, as if, realizing that the mass of Conflicts exposed by Anderson were insurmountable, in responding to the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Amended Complaint, had their counsel, Gregg M. Mashberg and Joanna Smith of Proskauer, then begin representing themselvesPRO SE (perhaps they too could not secure Independent Non Conflicted Counsel to represent them), while still also acting as Counsel for their firm, defying Conflict laws again? Evidence of these conflicts can be found at the following URL’s, hereby incorporated in entirety by reference herein,

May 13, 2008 Proskauer Letter to Scheindlin regarding the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Amended Complaint affirming Proskauer is responding to the DOCKETED Amended Complaint not the Original Complaint.

June 28, 2008 Proskauer Reply Memorandum. Note that Proskauer here RESPONDS IN WHOLE TO THE AMENDED COMPLAINT (AC) and Proskauer represents Proskauer and further Proskauer Attorneys Representing Proskauer, Mashberg and Smith, are SUDDENLY, for the first time, and without Court Approval, Representing Themselves PRO SE, which violates additional Conflict of Interest Rules and more. As this and all Proskauer filings tendered to the Court were filed in Conflict, which Violates Attorney Conduct Codes and more, the substance is worthless, other than as Prima Facie evidence of continued Fraud on the Court and Government Agencies.

MAJOR NOTE! Recently, April 15, 2011, in attempts to harass an Investigative Blogger who is exposing the Proskauer Rose Crime Family Syndicate and more, Crystal C. Cox, in a LEGAL COMPLAINT AGAINST COX, with the WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION ARBITRATION & MEDIATION CENTER, Proskauer againCOMMITS FURTHER FRAUD ON A GOVERNMENT AGENCY. Fraud in efforts to HARASS Cox using vexatious, malicious and bad faith LEGAL actions, as they claim FALSELY, QUOTE,

Mr. Bernstein’s lawsuit was dismissed on August 8, 2008 (see Annex 6). The court did not grant Mr. Bernstein leave to amend. Mr. Bernstein appealed to the Second Circuit.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/76781231/Matthew-Triggs-Proskauer-Rose-LLP

As was illustrated in the Reply Memorandum above, Proskauer not only knew the US District Court GRANTED the Amended Complaint but they FACTUALLY RESPONDED to the AMENDED COMPLAINT IN WHOLE. This illustrates further, how PROSKAUER ROSE commits FRAUD ON GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, using the Agencies to HARASS and INTIMIDATE those trying to expose the Criminal RICO Organization and in efforts to scrub the evidences and information of their crimes from the WEB.

Now that Conflicts of Interest are affirmed and acknowledged by the Attorney General’s Office, a mass of actions must be taken to IMMEDIATELY REMOVE the CONFLICTS from ALL Iviewit matters, including but not limited to, existing court and criminal cases. Further, the Attorney General must notify all Relevant Parties, such as the courts and prosecutorial offices IMMEDIATELY of the existence of Conflicts. For a partial list of Relevant Parties to be notified, see the following URL, hereby incorporated in entirety by reference herein,

http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/INVESTIGATIONS%20MASTER.htm .

All Relevant Parties must be notified immediately of the Conflicts identified, as actions of the New York Attorney General have prejudiced and continue to prejudice ongoing proceedings and any/all closed proceedings that must be re-examined in light of the new evidence of conflicts.

First, the Attorney General must DISQUALIFY/RECUSE their offices from investigating the CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS filed at the Attorney General and Governor’s Offices. Second, they must also now WITHDRAW from representation in all Lawsuits and Proceedings of IVIEWIT, Eliot I. Bernstein, ALL LEGALLY RELATED CASES to Iviewit, Eliot I. Bernstein and the legally related WHISTLEBLOWER, Christine C. Anderson’s Lawsuit, as listed below:

Legally Related Cases to Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin @ New York Second Circuit

1. Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT, which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Federal Judge Shira Ann Scheindlin

2. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket - Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. – 12 COUNT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT

3. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.

4. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.

5. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.

Legally Related Cases to Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson by Federal Judge Shira A. Scheindlin @ US District Court - Southern District NY

6. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. -WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin

7. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.

8. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.

9. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.

10. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.

11. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.

12. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.

13. 08cv04053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.

14. 08cv04438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.

15. 08cv06368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York

16. 06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al.

Acknowledging that the Attorney General’s Office, and, current and former Attorney General Officials are being sued in both their Professional and Individual capacities, conflicting them out of handling ANY related matters, forces the Attorney General to IMMEDIATELY remove all prior court and prosecutorial filings they have made in the past. All of these past filings, filed in conflict, now need to have new NON- CONFLICTED PROSECUTORS/FEDERAL MONITORS NON and NON CONFLICTED COURTS review ALL prior decisions and determinations made by the Attorney General in the Criminal Complaints and Court Cases that have been prejudiced by the Conflicts, Violations of Public Office Rules & Regulations and Law thus far. All previous representations by the Attorney General’s office were filed in Conflict, as has been complained of in my RICO& ANTITRUST Lawsuit since the very start, and have prejudiced the Lawsuit and all investigations. Therefore, the Attorney General must notify the Court and all other relevant parties investigating or hearing these matters, including all state, federal and international investigators listed herein, of their Conflicts and their Withdrawal from all proceedings forthwith.

Further, all of these Criminal and Civil matters, per Mr. Roger’s admission, now need to be represented by the Attorney General’s NON-CONFLICTED Independent Counsel and Investigated by NON-CONFLICTED Independent Special Prosecutors/Federal Monitors, all brought in to the replace the Attorney General’s multiple conflicted and illegal roles.

Next, the Acknowledged and Admitted Conflicts of Interest by the Attorney General’s office, cause ALL current ILLEGAL representations of New York State Actors/Defendants by the New York Attorney General’s Office in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, to cease and desist, forcing the State Actors/Defendants to seek new and INDEPENDENT NON CONFLICTED COUNSEL to represent them. The Attorney General must WITHDRAW IMMEDIATELY AS COUNSEL to all State Actors/Defendants in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit both in their Professional and Individual capacities. The Attorney General should notify the Courts instantly of their Withdrawal as Counsel to all State Actors/Defendants.

The State Actor/Defendants must also now seek new NON-CONFLICTED representation in the RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT and that counsel must be separate and distinct counsel for their Professional and Individual Representations. Going forward, it would appear that while the State of New York may pay for the State Actors/Defendants Professional legal defenses, their Individual legal defenses should be separate and billed directly to them as personal expenses and further paid personally, precluding further misuse of Public Funds.

The New York Attorney General must also seek independent counsel to represent the New York Attorney General’s Office and the former Attorney General Officials directly named as State Actors/Defendants, again separate counsel for their Professional and Individual representation. In addition, notice has been given to both Cuomo and Cohen that in addition to the Criminal Complaints previously filed against them, they will both be forthcoming State Actors/Defendants both Professionally and Individually, in all Iviewit/Eliot I. Bernstein worldwide Lawsuits, both current and future, and where the Patents are concerned, litigation may continue for 20 or more years.

IV. ALLEGED MISUSE OF PUBLIC FUNDS TO PURCHASE ILLEGAL LEGAL COUNSEL FOR PERSONAL REPRESENTATIONS OF ACCUSED PUBLIC OFFICIALS IN VIOLATION OF ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES, PUBLIC OFFICE RULES & REGULATIONS AND STATE LAW.

Anderson claims, quote,

“The Attorney General is a publicly funded arm of the State. It was conflicted from the outset of this case because it could not possibly defend any of the defendants, while simultaneously investigating plaintiff’s claims of serious ongoing misconduct by the defendants. Indeed, no explanation has ever been provided as to why the Attorney General did not represent plaintiff Anderson against any of the original defendants. This was itself a misappropriation of public funds by a state investigative agency with prosecution powers.”

This evidences further criminal acts and financial abuse of PUBLIC FUNDS by Public Officials exposed by Anderson! Abuse necessitating immediate investigation of Officials represented ILLEGALLY by the New York Attorney General in the Anderson Lawsuit and the“Legally Related” Lawsuits. Lawyers/State Actors/Defendants represented in these Lawsuits in their Professional Capacities by the New York Attorney General, and then additionally and illegally represented by the Attorney General in their Individual Capacities, is in Violation of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and State & Federal Law.

Legal Fees for these illegal defenses in their Professional Capacities paid for by the State of New York may be permissible, but Legal Fees for Individual Legal Defenses for Criminal Acts outside the scope of their office duties, are Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules & Regulations and New York State Law, as evidenced herein. Presumably, these illegal Individual Legal Fees either are gifts by the Attorney General’s office to the Public Officials or distributed as income to them personally for tax reporting purposes. If the Attorney General does not distribute the fees as income or gifts, the illegal legal fees for their Individual Defenses paid for by the New York Taxpayers may be a misuse of Public Funds according to Whistleblower Anderson, an expert in these matters.

These “free” legal services fees give the accused State Actors/Defendants unlimited funds to defend themselves for the crimes they are accused of by their victims on State Dime and the illegal representations also prejudice the lawsuits and any juries, as it appears the Attorney General is the attorney opposing the Plaintiffs in the Lawsuits. Doubtfully, these Individual Legal Fees, which in lawsuits such as my RICO & ANTITRUST and Anderson’s Whistleblower Lawsuit, may range in the tens of millions of dollars, are being reflected as personal income on the State Actors/Defendants personal income tax returns (both state and federal), therefore these returns should be audited immediately by the appropriate authorities.

Further, the New York Attorney General would have to file such Individual Legal Fees properly in annual state and federal tax returns and fully disclose them to state auditors, separating out the legal billings for professional representation (which on information and belief the state can pay) and for individual representation (which the state cannot pay). These State of New York returns also deserve immediate audit by the proper authorities. If both the Attorney General and the State Actors/Defendants have not properly filed in their tax returns the Legal Fees, clearly this represents, on information and belief, Tax Evasion, Misuse of Public Funds and more.

On information and belief, the cost for Spitzer’s PERSONAL defenses to Proskauer Rose was reputedly approximately US $400,000.00 dollars and over ONE MILLION in total paid out of New York States coffers. Since the crimes had nothing to do with Public Office Duties, Spitzer should have paid the legal fees directly out of his personal funds. Instead, the Great State of New York fleeced, paying personal defense funds for Public Officers committing felony crimes, including sexual crimes in Violation of the FEDERAL MANN ACT, crimes that are outside of the scope of their office duties. Further, several key Spitzer Officials, after Spitzer’s forced resignation, then landed Instant Partnerships with Proskauer, further advancing the Conflicts in the Conflict Swamp of the New York Courts and Prosecutorial Offices.

Again, this may represent illegal use of State Funds for personal legal defense fees, of course, a review of Defendant in my RICO, Eliot Spitzer’s tax returns and the NY Attorney General’s, both state and federal, would reveal how these personal defense monies to Proskauer Rose were reported to the IRS or if they ever were. If they were not this represents a clear misuse of Public Funds and Tax Evasion and immediate cause for investigation of all those involved.

V. RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit and Related Cases UPDATE

The new Investigators and new INDEPENDENT COUNSEL handling these matters, are apprised here of the salient updates in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, Anderson’s Related Whistleblower Lawsuit and the “Legally Related” lawsuits defined already herein. These updates may not be readily apparent at this time to new investigators and counsel in these matters, due to many of the Ongoing Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Public Office Rules & Regulations and Law still PLAGUING the matters and ILLEGALLY INFLUENCING these lawsuits and Criminal Complaints in the courts and within prosecutorial offices. Per Anderson, information may have been destroyed or altered in these cases and complaints Whitewashed, demanding a full and thorough review of the matters, with fresh complaint information tendered to assure the veracity of the materials.

The Anderson filing in Federal Court to remove the Attorney General, already incorporated by reference herein, indicates that former Chief Counsel of the New York State Supreme Court Disciplinary Department, Thomas Cahill, a State Actor/Defendant in both the Anderson Lawsuit and my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, perjured court testimony and committed other violations of Law. The perjured statements further Obstructed Justice in the Anderson Federal Whistleblower Lawsuit and will at some point in time demand rehearing due to the FRAUD ON THE COURT. In particular, Anderson claims, quote,

“Newly Discovered Evidence At Trial Required Immediate Disqualification

The court gave the jury above-referenced instructions and its members adjourned to the jury room to deliberate at approximately 1:25 pm on Thursday, October 29, 2009. After the jury left the courtroom, the court first announced that she had denied the defendants’ pending motion for a directed verdict. She next stated words to the effect that she found that,“….Cahill was aware of the whitewashing allegations…” (Exhibit A, pages 808-809) The judge read this statement related to defendant Cahill’s conduct into the record as part of her order denying defendant’s directed verdict. This fact alone requires a new trial, and should have resulted in the Attorney General’s office immediately withdrawing from the case.

In addition, Courts have an obligation to report and order investigation into official and at times criminal misconduct. This is a duty of the Court. There is no record to date as to any action having been undertaken by the Court regarding this central question. (See also recent decisions on spoliation of evidence which are state and federal crimes. Acorn v. Nassau County - cv052301 (2009 USDistLEXIS 19459) and Gutman v. Klein, 03cv1570. 2008 WL 5084182, 2008 WL 4682208.

The Court’s finding of culpability on the part of Defendant Cahill constitutes newly discovered evidence, which directly supports the fundamental allegations of Plaintiff.

Remand to the District Court for a new trial is highly likely as the trial court abused its discretion in denying a new trial. The Attorney General’s failure to withdraw is, in fact, sanctionable and worthy of referral to the attorney ethics committee.

Clearly the newly discovered fact that defendant Cahill, as the head of the DDC and supervisor of the other named defendants, had full knowledge of whitewashing activities would in all likelihood have changed the outcome of the case. This central fact establishing the liability of all named defendants could not have been discovered earlier and is not merely cumulative or impeaching. (See Farragher v. Boca Raton, 524 U.S. 775, 18 S. Ct. 2275 (1998) which imputes liability to supervisors in any event. In Farragher, the Supreme Court held that an employer is vicariously liable for actionable discrimination caused by a supervisor. All defendants are jointly and severally liable here. In fact, the State of New York is liable under Faragher, all while representation of the Attorney General’s office improperly continued.”

Another reason for demanding immediate investigations by State & Federal Authorities is further uncovered in Anderson’s Motion and involves EXTORTIONARY THREATS on a Federal Witnesses in Anderson’s Whistleblowing Lawsuit by Senior New York Supreme Court Officials. In particular, Anderson states, quote,

“Witness Tampering - Threat on Witness In a Federal Proceeding

The Attorney General and the trial court were aware that in August of 2008, one of the plaintiff’s witnesses, DDC staff attorney Nicole Corrado, was threatened. Two days prior to her deposition testimony, state employee, and DDC Deputy Chief Counsel, Andral N. Bratton, and who had been her immediate supervisor for approximately 5 years, confronted Corrado. Bratton advised Corrado that in 2007 he had admitted himself into a psychiatric hospital for serious emotional problems, that he had “suicidal tendencies,” and that he was “warning” her accordingly. When Corrado asked Bratton why he was warning her, Bratton simply repeated several times in a very serious and stern tone by saying, “I’m just warning you.”

Following Corrado’s deposition testimony on August 21, 2008, Bratton’s behavior toward Corrado became more harassing, troubling, frightening and threatening as he began to follow her inside and outside of the state office where they both worked. Corrado subsequently reported these serious issues to DDC Chief Counsel Allan Friedberg, Deputy Chief Counsel Sherry Cohen, a defendant in the current proceeding, and DDC Chief Investigator Vincent Raniere- all of whom who took no required action.

Plaintiff’s former counsel, John Beranbaum, advised the court, and by copy, the Attorney General, of this incident in a letter to the court dated October 24, 2008. In the Beranbaum submission, it was made clear to the court and the Attorney General that Ms. Corrado was given a ‘“warning’about the testimony she was to gave at the deposition[,]” and further advised that “Ms. Corrado is very upset about the entire experience.

Mr. Beranbaum again raised the issue on the record four days later on October 30, 2008. (See Exhibit, “B” – Transcript of October 30, 2008 hearing, Page 26 (lines 17-25), and page 27 (lines 1-8). The court, in responding to the letter advising of the threat on plaintiff’s witness, commented, “You [Mr. Beranbaum] seem to want to tell me something or report it to me. Okay. You report it to me.”

It is plaintiff’s belief that the court had an obligation to report the matter to federal agents and, further, to interview Ms. Corrado concerning the incident. In addition, the Attorney General also had an obligation as the state’s top enforcer of the law.

Plaintiff believes she has been severely prejudiced by the threat upon her witness, Ms. Corrado, and, as the lower court and Attorney General were aware, Ms. Corrado did not appear as a witness in this proceeding.

While plaintiff is aware that counsel within the Office of the New York Attorney General’s office offered to “fully” compensate Mr. Beranbaum for ALL of his legal fees, expenses, etc., if plaintiff settled her case, she is unaware of the exact timing of when the compensation offer, believed to be between $120,000.00 and $150,000.00, was actually made.

Conclusion

For the reasons set forth, Moving respectfully requests that this Court in the interest of justice issue an order restraining the Office of the New York State Attorney General’s office from representing employees of the State of New York in any legal proceeding involving the herein before any federal or state court, agency or any other tribunal grant a new trial.

As noted, the participation of the Attorney General in failing to investigate the charges submitted by plaintiff against the defendants, and subsequently representing these same persons in the instant court proceedings, denied plaintiff’s constitutionally protected right to a fair and impartial trial. This denial of basic rights was compounded by unclear, confusing and convoluted instructions to the jury, discovery of new evidence and serious allegations of intimidation of witnesses, which all support the de novo pending appeal and granting of the instant motion for disqualification.

Wherefore, Moving respectfully requests that the court grant the within Motion, as well as such other and further relief that may be just and proper. I declare under penalty perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on September 14, 2010″

Note that Count 1 of Anderson’s Lawsuit, her claim to Violation of Free Speech (her Whistleblower Testimony), the Jury Verdict awarded in her favor, which is the fundamental piece of her Lawsuit for the “Legally Related”Lawsuits listed herein, including the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, as that is the count that exposes the corruption the victims have complained from. From Anderson’s Verdict, quote,

“RETALIATION

Deprivation of a Federal Right: Plaintiff’s Acts of Speech:

Jury Question “Has plaintiff proven, by a preponderance of the evidence, that she made statements that the DDC failed to diligently prosecute complaints of misconduct made by the public against attorneys?

Jury Verdict = YES”

After learning of the Criminal Allegations levied by Anderson against US Attorneys, the DA’s, the ADA’s, New York Supreme Court Officials and “Favored Lawyers and Law Firms”, a Motion was filed with the Second Circuit by Iviewit/Eliot Bernstein titled,

“EMERGENCY Motion to Compel/HALT PROCEEDING PENDING CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND OVERSIGHT. REMOVE THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN THIS COURT THROUGH CESSATION OF VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL CANNONS, ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES, PUBLIC OFFICE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAW. RESTORE ORDER TO THIS COURT!”

“The Motion to Compel states that any actions by the Courts, prior to fully resolving the CRIMINAL ALLEGATIONS of Anderson, Conflicts of Interest, Illegal Representations, Violations of Public Office Rules & Regulations, Violations of Attorney Conduct Codes, Violations of Judicial Cannons and State& Federal Law, would be used against them in a court of law. That any actions taken by the Court prior to resolution would be submitted to Criminal Authorities as further Prima Facie evidence of further Criminal Fraud on the Courts and more. The motion states specifically, quote,

In summation, this Writ of Motion to Compel, Compelling this Court and all those involved with Professional Legal Titles to “Freeze, put your hands up in the air and surrender”. [sic] Surrender until all applicable Law Enforcement and oversight Authorities summoned can evaluate your further right to continued involvement in these matters and can determine the degree of Your culpability of which You may become a Defendant in these matters. Freeze, as this is a Citizen’s Arrest [120][22] and take no further action that Violates JC [Judicial Cannons], ACC [Attorney Conduct Codes], PORR [Public Office Rules & Regulations] and Law as required by JC, ACC, PORR and Law, for a period necessary for Authorities summoned to examine the alleged Violations of JC, ACC, PORR and Law.

“You [all Justices, Court Personnel, Law Firms, Lawyers and Public Office Officials involved in the Legal Disposition of this Lawsuit] have the right to remain silent. Anything You say [or put in Order or Motion or Pleading, etc. in this Lawsuit] can and will be used against You in a court of law [a conflict free court]…Do You understand these rights?” This reading of Miranda is not a joke but more a Citizen’s Arrest notification that action on Your part forward without the summoned oversight Authorities and Law Enforcement approval of Your actions thus far and continuation going forward will be met with further CRIMINAL AND CIVIL charges against You. ANY ACTION taken prior to such time will incur filing of criminal charges against You with all appropriate authorities. Charges will include US Code Title 18 Obstruction charges, RICO charges and more, as defined herein and in the Amended Complaint and it would be best if YOU TURN YOURSELF IN TO AUTHORITIES versus forcing further rights under a Citizen’s Arrest to Force You into custody.

I remind this Court, which acts outside its own Rules, as if Above the Law, of the all too recent “Judges’ Trial[121][23]” of the infamous Nuremberg Trials. Proving that no one is Above the Law, not Justices, not Lawyers, nor Presidents or Deciders and that while power may corrupt and perverse those that control law at times, when the Long Arm of the Law regains its reach, the Guilty will be Tried despite their Titles and perceived Entitlement. Changing laws in order to commit crimes by those entrusted to uphold the sanctity of Law is not a defense that holds up well in a fair and impartial courtroom. Once Law and Order was re-established, the NAZI Party crushed and their delusional grandeur deflated, the Judges Trial tried the NAZI justices and lawyers who changed Law to allow Torture, Death Camps and Theft of Personal Properties, all eventually convicted in US Courts acting in Germany for the War Crimes, including for the Abuse and Misuse of Law. Above the Law while deluded in grandeur from sick Abuse of Power, yet in the end sentenced to life imprisonment for their crimes and forever stamped into history as Nazi war criminals. Eventually Justice will return to This Court and those guilty of misusing Law for personal gain to the disadvantage of citizens tried and convicted too.”

Footnote [22]

[120] New York State Consolidated Laws hold that: Any person may arrest another person (a) for a felony when the latter has in fact committed such felony, and (b) for any offense when the latter has in fact committed such offense in his presence. (N.Y.C.L. 140.30).

Footnote [23]

[121] The Judges’ Trial (or the Justice Trial, or, officially, The United States of America vs. Josef Altstötter, et al.) was the third of the twelve trials for war crimes the U.S. authorities held in their occupation zone in Germany in Nuremberg after the end of World War II. These twelve trials were all held before U.S. military courts, not before the International Military Tribunal, but took place in the same rooms at the Palace of Justice. The twelve U.S. trials are collectively known as the “Subsequent Nuremberg Trials” or, more formally, as the “Trials of War Criminals before the Nuremberg Military Tribunals” (NMT)…

In her August 08, 2008 Dismissal[24], Scheindlin referred all the “Legally Related” cases, prior to resolution of the Anderson case, for investigations to the Attorney General’s Office, US Attorney and to the US Supreme Court. Scheindlin’s referrals to the Plaintiffs indicate that the Lawsuits and Criminal Complaints are far from over in either the courts or prosecutorial offices. With Scheindlin’s knowledge of further Criminal Acts committed directly in her Courtroom, evidencing perjury and other crimes committed by a State Actor/Defendant, almost certainly, all the “Legally Related” Lawsuits will now be remanded for full, fair and impartial rehearings, due to the factual FRAUD ON THE COURTS AND STATE & FEDERAL AGENCIES. Fraud on the Courts is yet another crime, one that invalidates the whole defenses tendered prior in Violation of Law and in essence Reboots the lawsuits with a prejudice in favor of the Plaintiffs. Scheindlin states, quote,

“As discussed below, the United States Constitution does not permit this Court to supervise the departmental disciplinary committees or review the decisions of the courts of New York State. Regardless of the possibility of corruption in the courts of the State of New York, the only federal court that may review their decisions is the United States Supreme Court[5]. Plaintiffs must direct their complaints to the state court system, the Attorney General for the State of New York, or the appropriate United States Attorney. Because the Court lacks jurisdiction to review the decisions of the departmental disciplinary committees, and for the other reasons stated below, these actions are dismissed.”

Footnote [24]

August 08, 2008 USDC Dismissal Order

In an earlier ORDER dated March 10, 2008, Scheindlin stated upon initial review of the Conflicts of Interest identified by Plaintiffs in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, quote,

“ORDER: I have considered plaintiffs’ request and have determined that the Attorney General does not face an improper conflict of interest in representing the State Defendants. If, however, the Attorney General concludes that an investigation of defendants is warranted, then independent counsel would be required.”[25]

Footnote [25]

March 10, 2008 Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin ORDER in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

March 05, 2008, Letter to Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin re Attorney General Conflicts

With Anderson’s Criminal Allegations, the Attorney General was legally obligated to INVESTIGATE Anderson’s credible eyewitness accounts of Criminal Acts committed by numerous Defendants in both Anderson’s Lawsuit and my RICO& ANTITRUST Lawsuit. Here again, we see that Independent Non-Conflicted Counsel is now required and the Lawsuit must be reheard free of the Conflicts of Interest that existed in all prior filings in that Lawsuit by the Attorney General. Despite Iviewit’s attempts to confirm or deny conflicts with the Attorney General’s Office in one of the first filings of my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, Judge Scheindlin decided that at the time there were no conflicts she could she. Yet, Scheindlin failed to have the Attorney General or any other party charged with conflicts, confirm or deny if conflicts existed and instead responded for them, defying logic.

Therefore, the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Appeal was put on hold by Plaintiffs, pending investigations of the Criminal Complaints filed by Iviewit against;

1. Appeal Court Officials who continued adjudicating on the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Appeal while allowing the Conflicts to persist. The Court of Appeals allowed the Attorney General to continue to represent the State Actors/Defendants in the Appeals, amazingly even after Anderson’s Criminal Allegations against the Attorney General and others in the Lower Court. Further, charges were filed against the Appeal Court for their failure to allow investigations to proceed prior to their efforts to illegally derail the RICO& ANTITRUST Lawsuit Appeal through instant Dismissal, further Obstructing Justice.

2. Prosecutorial Offices named by Whistleblower Anderson, and as yet, unnamed Officials, including but not limited to,

a. The New York Attorney General

b. The New York District Attorney

c. The New York Assistant District Attorney

d. The United States Attorney offices

e. New York Supreme Court Officials, including but not limited to Naomi Goldstein,

f. Unknown “Favored Law Firms & Lawyers.”

As the New York Courts, Regulatory Offices and Prosecutorial Offices are all center stage in the Anderson Whistleblower Lawsuit and RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, finding Non-Conflicted Officials in New York now to represent these matters going forward seems virtually impossible. Any Special Prosecutors or Court Officials now coming into the fray must be thoroughly vetted and screened for conflict with the hundreds of Iviewit Defendants in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit[26] directly culpable in the RICO Crimes, the Whistleblower Lawsuit and the“Legally Related” Lawsuits, including but not limited to, all of the parties listed at IVIEWIT DEFENDANTS RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT, hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein, and, all those already defined herein.

Footnote [26]

The number of Iviewit Defendants in toto is enormous, tens of thousands infringers of the PATENT PENDING technologies exist in manufacturing the inventions alone. If end users of the technologies are included, it would be hundreds of millions of infringers, including everyone who watches a digital video on the Internet, the TV and cell phone/pda, everyone who uses digital scalable zoom on cameras, medical devices, telescopes, flight simulators, etc. Without the technologies, there would be, NO YouTube, NO Video over the Internet at Full Screen Full Frame Rate, NO Low Band Video Conference or Cell Phone Video and more. The inventions literally changed the World and everything Digital in it, thus why leading engineers worldwide deemed them the “The Holy Grail.” In fact, Video Transmissions over the Internet account for the vast majority of use over the Internet and on PDA’s, making Multimedia far more valuable than say the Operating System, i.e. Windows.

VI. Ponzi Schemes & OTHER FINANCIAL SCHEMES THAT LED TO THE MELTDOWN ON WALL STREET/GREED STREET that Involve Current Defendants in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. Prior New York Attorney Generals Obstructed relevant complaint information that now needs IMMEDIATE new investigations, free of conflicts of interest. preclude further fraud on victims and the courts caused by obstruction of relevant Information in the following criminal and civil lawsuits of; Bernard L. Madoff, Allen Stanford, Marc S. Dreier, Galleon, Enron Broadband, enron Corporation, Arthur Andersen LLP and more.

A new view of the internal corruptions inside Government Agencies illuminated by Anderson reveal the Government as a “Revolving Door” to a Criminal RICO Organization composed mainly of Law Firms, Lawyers and Lawyers Inside Government Agencies and the courts, as outlined in Anderson’s testimony. What appears in this new light is that the Wall Street / Greed Street Meltdown and Ponzi Schemes, are actually diabolical intentional “CONTROLLED DEMOLITIONS.” Despite widespread exposure of the virtually never-ending Financial Crimes involved in the various phases of the US Economic meltdown, there also appears carefully constructed Cover-Ups as exposed by Anderson, so effective in fact that not a single prosecution, or minimalistic ones at best, despite the estimated TRILLIONS of DOLLARS STOLEN in the various illegal legal crimes and financial schemes.

A Government sponsored RICO and RECOVER strategy by the Department of Justice, targeting the few who have directly gained/profited from the orchestrated losses in the markets, to the detriment of now hundreds of millions of victims worldwide, is necessary in order to RECOVER the TRILLIONS of DOLLARS STOLEN. Without RECOVERING the MONIES STOLEN THROUGH CRIMINAL ACTS, the country cannot recover. If however, the RICO were successful, the RICO would require PAYBACK of Hundreds of Billions returned for Illegal Bogus Bonuses to those who bankrupted these blue-chip companies with intent. Hundreds of Billions more would be RECOVERED from those who benefited from the various Home Mortgage Scams. Hundreds of Billions more RECOVERED from those who benefited directly from the Stock Frauds & Illegal Price and Market Fixings. TRILLIONS more would be RECOVERED from those who took Fraudulent Government Bailouts based on covering other FRAUDS, which at the time the Public did not know that these Market Collapses were due to fraud and thus gave the bank robbers cab fare and a new house to chase the bank robbers.

Now simply add up the recovered LOOT a RICO would RECOVER and the country would no longer be bankrupt and a few would lose everything gained ILLEGALLY and would need a bailout, this time from CLUB FED. Keep in mind that ECONOMIC WARFARE is a WAR CRIME and a form of TREASON against the PEOPLE and at the end of trial for TREASON and WAR CRIMES, the punishment is the end of a rope. As always, NOOSES free @ www.iviewit.tv

Think of the Hundreds of Millions of VICTIMS WORLDWIDE directly impacted by the host of financial crimes. Victims of, for example, lost jobs in formerly Great American businesses that were forced illegally out of business through Anticompetitive WalMart tactics on Wall Street, while CEO’s carted off the Loot for intentionally bankrupting them, while SHAREHOLDERS & PENSION HOLDERS were wiped out in many instances. Homeless Victims ripped from homes based on bogus legal documents on usurious loans and fraudulent market manipulations caused by further fraudulent stock frauds underlying the rigged markets. Countries swallowed in debt from rigged markets and bogus financial instruments with AAA ratings sold to them under false pretence, TENS OF MILLIONS OF VICTIMS in each country devastated, HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS in our own country.

With ZERO PROSECUTION, one can see that the Fox is in the Henhouse and a bloodbath of Chickens has unfolded, the Criminal Organization with top down control of the Government and in charge of Key Regulatory Posts, with Justice Unguarded of Sword, the Scale of Justice tipped over, Lady Justice Weeping and HUNDREDS OF MILLIONS OF PEOPLE VICTIMIZED AND ROBBED. Shamefully, behind all of these events are LAWYERS/CRIMINALS who have created and approved all the legal documents for all of the CONTROLLED FINANCIAL FRAUDS and there are LAWYERS/CRIMINALS protecting them from PROSECUTION inside Government. For successful prosecution of the crimes, the LAWYERS MUST BE TRIED, all of them, despite their titles or public office positions, as they were CENTRAL RICO CONSPIRATORS to the whole FRAUDULENT CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF THE US AND WORLD ECONOMIES WITH THEIR CORPORATE CLIENTELE.

Information regarding these FRAUDS & SWINDLES, as they directly relate to the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit can be found at the URL’s listed below, fully incorporated by reference in entirety herein, and containing the Iviewit/Eliot Bernstein SEC Complaints. The allegations in the SEC Complaints demand concurrent investigations by Federal and New York Criminal Authorities due to the number of issues relating the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit to the above-mentioned Criminal and Civil Actions. These Ponzis and Financial schemes, in fact may be, Law Firm Money Laundering Schemes that further use the Courts to effectuate complex ILLEGAL LEGAL SCHEMES, WASHING THE FUNDS OF THE CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATIONS CRIMES through further FRAUDS ON THE COURTS& OTHER GOVERNMENT AGENCIES, such as, the Securities & Exchange Commission, Bankruptcy Courts, FINRA, DOJ and more. The Iviewit SEC Complaints are at the URL’s,

Eliot Bernstein of Iviewit Technologies files SEC & FBI Complaint with Mary Schapiro & Others against Warner Bros., AOL Inc., Time Warner, Intel, SGI, Lockheed Martin, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner”

AND

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=288

both fully incorporated in entirety by reference herein.

New Evidence and Important additional Information for Ongoing government Investigations of; Allen Stanford, Bernard L. Madoff, Proskauer Rose, Marc S. Dreier, Galleon, Enron Broadband, Enron, Arthur Andersen and their direct RELEVANCY to this Complaint

I am requesting that the ongoing investigations of Allen Stanford, Bernard L. Madoff, Proskauer Rose, Marc S. Dreier, Galleon, Enron Broadband, Enron and Arthur Andersen all be revisited and halted in light of the information contained herein, which may prove central to those investigations as further frauds and frauds on courts and government agencies. Converted royalties from my stolen technologies may have been funneled through these Ponzi and other securities trading schemes, especially where Defendants in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit are found directly involved in the schemes, some already behind bars. Investigators should therefore freeze all asset transactions and sales of stock in all of the following Ponzi schemes and other artifices to defraud, as they may be money-laundering operations, laundering converted royalties of my inventions for the law firms that stole them. The actual court cases may be further efforts by these all too clever law firms operating as a Criminal Enterprise to shuffle the stolen and converted Iviewit royalties (estimated in the hundreds of billions already) and other victims’ funds, in ever increasingly criminal frauds on the courts to further Wash the STOLEN LOOT.

Investigators should note Proskauer’s direct involvement in these schemes and ongoing SEC investigations, and, SEC & FBI Civil and Criminal Actions. Proskauer’s involvement pointed out in each scheme they are found to have direct involvement in, and again, Proskauer is the main Defendant in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. Additionally, Investigators should take special note of Proskauer’s direct and criminally culpable involvement in the Sir Robert Allen Stanford Ponzi (“Stanford”), as Stanford tentacles into International Criminal Cartels, also deserving formal investigation by not only the SEC but also by the FBI and all other authorities addressed herein. Has Proskauer Rose reported these liabilities from their involvement in these schemes to their liability carriers, including their involvement in SEC and FBI CIVIL and CRIMINAL actions, including a Global Class Action Lawsuit by the VICTIMS, for the entire Stanford Seven Billion Dollar Loss? One must then wonder how their carrier permits them to operate and continues to insure them for Malpractice, etc.

Finally, from the SEC Lawsuit and Judicial Ruling in the Stanford debacle, it is unclear if Proskauer Rose was included in the court ordered freeze and injunction on assets and documents issued by the court in the SEC Stanford Lawsuit, as the language included all attorneys. Proskauer has been identified with Proskauer Partner Thomas Sjoblom (“Sjoblom”) as constituting one of the law firms listed in the SEC LAWSUITS by multiple news sources. News reports confirm that the FBI is already conducting investigations into Stanford but both the SEC and FBI should pay particular attention as to how that crime may also relate to the stolen technologies described herein, also known as “Patentgate.”

The following information regarding these schemes represent where correlations involve Defendants named in my Federal RICO & ANTITRUST lawsuit, including but not limited to, all of the following.

Sir Robert Allen Stanford ~ SEC Ongoing Investigation, Indictment and FBI Investigation, sec/PROSKAUER ROSE are CENTER STAGE.

The SEC Lawsuits and Indictments and the FBI and SEC ONGOING Investigations of Sir Robert Allen Stanford, involve the main Defendant in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit Proskauer and Partner Thomas Sjoblom. Sjoblom has since resigned from Proskauer[27], both the firm and Sjoblom directly implicated in criminal activities in the Stanford investigation by the SEC and by Stanford Employees. Proskauer was acting as counsel for Stanford (Sjoblom a former SEC Enforcement Official) and Sjoblom acting as a Proskauer Partner, allegedly aided and abetted Stanford employees in lying to FEDERAL AGENTS investigating the Ponzi in a meeting in a Miami Airport Hanger. Sjoblom was an SEC Enforcement Official Prior to Joining Proskauer, again watch as the Revolving Door Spins to AID & ABET the crimes and then to COVER-UP, using multiple government agencies.

Footnote [27]

The SEC should also note that Christopher Clark Wheeler of Proskauer has taken early retirement from Proskauer Rose after ALMOST twenty years. See February 04, 2010 Press Release from the GEO group.

A Global Class Action lawsuit was also filed against Proskauer, for the entire SEVEN BILLION in DAMAGES resulting from the Stanford Ponzi, as indicated in the following URL’s, hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein.

August 31, 2009 “Proskauer Targeted in Class Action Over Handling of Stanford Financial” by Leigh Jones @ The National Law Journal

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202433436276&rss=newswire

List containing filed legal actions in the Stanford Ponzi, which includes legal actions against Proskauer by Injured Investors and Stanford Employees.

August 27, 2009 “Proskauer Rose, LLP; Thomas V. Sjoblum [SIC Sjoblom]/ Samuel Troice; Horacio Mendez; Annalisa Mendez; Punga Punga Financial, Ltd., on behalf of all investors who purchased or held Certificates of Deposit or otherwise maintained accounts with Stanford International Bank as of February 2009.”

http://www.oakbridgeins.com/clients/blog/troice.pdf

Legal action was also filed against Proskauer and Sjoblom by Laura Pendergest Holt, one of the Stanford officers arrested by the FBI in the Stanford Ponzi,[28] as illustrated in the following URL’s, hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein,

http://amlawdaily.typepad.com/sjoblom.pdf

Footnote [28]

[28]February 27, 2009 “FBI make first arrest in $8 billion Allen Stanford fraud investigation” Telegraph Media Group LimitedMarch 27, 2009 Thomas V. Sjoblom and Proskauer Rose, LLP/ Laura Pendergest-Holt

Note that Stanford is also under ongoing investigation by the FBI for involvement with leading International Criminal Cartels and where it has been reported that the FBI has been conducting a long-standing investigation of this connection.

James Davis, a key figure also arrested by the FBI in Stanford and Allen Stanford’s longtime friend and second in command, copped a plea deal whereby he pointed to Proskauer and Sjoblom as directly involved, leading to further civil actions by Injured Investors against Proskauer.

February 19, 2009 “Charges Against Stanford a Long Time Coming, Offshore Banking Experts Say Accused Financier Under Federal Drug Investigation” ABC News by Justin Rood and Brian Ross.

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=6907429&page=1

August 27, 2009, “The Stanford Affair: Another Bad Day for Proskauer’s Tom Sjoblom” Wall Street Journal Legal Blog by Amir Efrati.

http://blogs.wsj.com/law/2009/08/27/the-stanford-affair-another-bad-day-for-proskauers-tom-sjoblom/tab/article

More information Regarding the Stanford, Proskauer and Iviewit correlations can be found at all of the following URL’s, hereby incorporated in entirety by reference herein,

February 25, 2009 Eliot Bernstein Petition to the US District Court for the Northern District of Texas in the SEC v Stanford lawsuits DOCKETS NO: 3:09-cv-00298-N, 3:09-cv-00298-L and 1:09-mc-00002-JAD titled “IN THE MATTER OF THE APPLICATION AND PETITION-COMPLAINT OF ELIOT BERNSTEIN TO INTERVENE AND/OR JOIN AS A PLAINTIFF IN THE WITHIN ACTION BOTH INDIVIDUALLY AND AS TRUSTEE ON BEHALF OF JOSHUA ENNIO ZANDER BERNSTEIN IRREVOCABLE TRUST, JACOB NOAH ARCHIE BERNSTEIN IRREVOCABLE TRUST & DANIEL ELIJSHA ABE OTTOMO BERNSTEIN IRREVOCABLE TRUST”

March 02, 2009 “EMERGENCY MOTION TO INVESTIGATE PROSKAUER ROSE DEFENDANTS INVOLVEMENT IN THE ALLEN STANFORD FINANCIAL, THE BERNARD MADOFF AND THE MARC DRIER FRAUD SCANDALS. REMOVE PROSKAUER FROM SELF REPRESENTATION IN THESE MATTERS UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE FBI REMOVES THEM FROM THE ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE STANFORD FINANCIAL FRAUD

August 21, 2009 –08-4873-CV United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit Iviewit Motion to Compel US Second Circuit Court to Follow Law. Allen Stanford, Bernard Madoff, Marc S. Dreier links to Iviewit via Proskauer Rose and Foley and Lardner implicated in Trillion-Dollar Suit. Citizen Arrest of Judge Ralph Winter & Clerk Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe.

Online Interactive Version @

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=78

Original Signed Filed Motion @

September 24, 2009 New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearing and Eliot Bernstein’s testimony before the Committee, Bernstein’s testimony begins at 3 Hours 38 Minutes into the hearings.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw&feature=player_embedded

October 05, 2009 – Prepared Statement of Eliot I. Bernstein of Iviewit to New York Senate Judiciary Committee John L. Sampson Regarding Trillion Dollar Iviewit Federal Lawsuit Naming Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, IBM, Intel, SGI, Lockheed and More”

Online Interactive Version @

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=165

AND

Filed Copy

The links provided in the Stanford Section are also beneficial for the following sections on Madoff and Dreier Ponzi Schemes and therefore will not be relisted in those sections.

This information should be cause for the Investigators addressed herein to reanalyze the entire Stanford scheme in light of this new evidence. All asset sales and other distributions should instantly be halted until these material facts can be reviewed to determine if these funds are also relating to the Iviewit stolen patents.

Bernard L. Madoff SEC Ongoing Investigation and Conviction as it Relates to Proskauer Rose

Several ties between Proskauer and Madoff also exist, learned in part from the SEC OIG stinging report on Madoff, which harshly criticized lax regulators for overlooking the Madoff information from Whistleblowers and Insiders at the SEC, over a several year period. According to TPM, in 2004 an SEC attorney, Genevievette Walker-Lightfoot, notified the SEC of the Ponzi but was forced out of her job, the SEC later settling a claim filed by Lightfoot. Upon termination, Lightfoot turned over the Madoff file to Jacqueline Wood who then presumably buried the report, as it goes missing from that point, including information that could have exposed the Ponzi in 04. The SEC OIG’s report mentions Wood throughout the entire report as a key figure in the regulatory failure, after leaving the SEC, Wood took a cozy Proskauer Rose partnership[29]. Again, we find an SEC employee, Wood, taking a Proskauer partnership, similar to Sjoblom leaving the SEC for Proskauer and both directly implicated in the SEC failures. This pattern may identify to Investigators further how these alleged Criminal Enterprise Law Firms move in and out of Regulatory bodies to stave off investigations. All of the following URL’s expand on this Revolving Door of Proskauer’s and are fully incorporated by reference in entirety herein,

March 02, 2009 “EMERGENCY MOTION TO INVESTIGATE PROSKAUER ROSE DEFENDANTS INVOLVEMENT IN THE ALLEN STANFORD FINANCIAL, THE BERNARD MADOFF AND THE MARC DRIER FRAUD SCANDALS. REMOVE PROSKAUER FROM SELF REPRESENTATION IN THESE MATTERS UNTIL SUCH TIME THAT THE FBI REMOVES THEM FROM THE ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS INTO THE STANFORD FINANCIAL FRAUD

Footnote [29]

“Bernie Madoff: SEC Investigator Fingered Bernie In ‘04; SEC Chief Lori Richards “Resigns” TPM Media LLC. July 9, 2009I filed Motions at the US Second Circuit Court of Appeals and US District Court, already exhibited herein, with similar claims of regulatory failures of the prior Presidential administration. Failures allegedly directly related to the Madoff case and I have reported this to Federal Authorities. The Motions also discuss Conflicts centering on the Madoff saga where Proskauer publicly identified their firm as having the most clients in the Madoff Ponzi and now it is revealed in the press that many Madoff clients are the subject of ongoing SEC investigations as NOT VICTIMS BUT INSTEAD CRIMINAL ACCOMPLICES.

The Motion to Compel, already exhibited herein, at the US Second Circuit, is to Compel that court to address the Conflicts of Interest and other matters according to law, laws being ignored while the Court and the Defendants perpetuate never ending Conflicts and Crimes. Note here that the handling of the Madoff Ponzi is by the same courts handling my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit and that the same courts were notified for months of the correlations between the Madoff Ponzi and my Lawsuit and have failed to notify the proper authorities, including the SEC and instead attempted to bury my lawsuit and motions.

Investigators should further note that in the courts handling my Lawsuit, many of the judges and clerks are also Defendants in the Lawsuit and despite the obvious conflicts, they continue to handle the matters, as if no rules or laws apply to them. These illegal actions by members of the courts should also be cause for the SEC, FBI and others addressed herein to investigate the members of the courts involved for possible collusion and aiding and abetting these schemes through Fraud on the Courts by those Adjudicating in the Courts, in Violation Conflicts of Interest and Law.

All those addressed herein, should therefore immediately begin investigation of the Second Circuit and US District Court for the Southern District of New York court officials involved. Especially concerning their concealment from authorities of these material facts relating to these Ponzi and other schemes, again a Misprision of Felony and whereby had the courts acted within law they could have prevented injury to many Victims in these Schemes years earlier, when I initially reported Proskauer’s misdeeds to them.

This information should be cause for the Investigators summoned herein to reanalyze the entire Madoff Scheme in light of this new evidence. All asset sales and other distributions should instantly be halted until these material facts can be reviewed to determine if these funds are also relating to the Iviewit stolen patents.

Marc S. Dreier SEC Investigation and Conviction

The SEC Indictment and subsequent Conviction of Marc S. Dreier as it relates to Proskauer, comes from the connection to Patent Attorney Raymond A. Joao. Joao initially introduced to Iviewit as a Proskauer partner who was to take the patent disclosures on behalf of Proskauer Partner Kenneth Rubenstein. Joao was then found putting patents into his own name for inventions learned from Iviewit and myself, Joao now found with 90+ patents in his name. Joao’s fraud on Iviewit also was a FRAUD ON THE UNITED STATES PATENT OFFICE and is under investigation as such with the US Patent Office and FBI, which has led to the Iviewit Patents and Intellectual Properties SUSPENSION by the Commissioner of the US Patent Office, pending investigations of Joao and many other patent attorneys.

Joao then joined the Marc S. Dreier law firm of Dreier & Baritz. This new information should be cause for the Investigators to reanalyze the entire Dreier Ponzi Scheme in light of this new evidence, and in fact, the monies of the Dreier Ponzi allegedly directly relate to royalties from sales and licensing of Joao’s stolen Intellectual Properties. The Dreier Ponzi is alleged to be another money-laundering scheme concocted by the Defendants in my Federal RICO & ANTITRUST lawsuit. Investigators should also cease distribution of assets in the Dreier Ponzi, especially where the Trustee appears conflicted with Proskauer and again the court actions may be further attempts by these all too clever law firms to abscond with funds in further illegal legal actions and Fraud on the Court.

In addition to the links in the Stanford section, which deal with the Drier / Joao / Iviewit connection, additional links below substantiate these claims and are included in entirety by reference herein,

Raymond Anthony Joao’s Biography from Dreier & Baritz LLP states, quote,

“Raymond A. Joao joined Dreier & Baritz LLP in 2001 as Of Counsel to the Firm’s intellectual property department. Mr. Joao brings to the Firm an extensive legal, business and engineering background encompassing virtually all aspects of intellectual property, including prosecution of patent applications; reexaminations; preparation of patent opinions; litigation; and counseling clients in the development, management and exploitation of their intellectual property assets.

Mr. Joao is also currently an intellectual property management consultant for various start-up software, telecommunication, Internet and e-commerce companies. He regularly directs new business and intellectual property development efforts; negotiates contracts; drafts license agreements; performs due diligence in mergers and acquisitions; assists in the preparation of business plans, executive summaries and other corporate documents; conducts competitive analysis studies; aids in the formulation of litigation strategies; and assists in capital raising efforts.

Notably, Mr. Joao is the inventor of 10 issued U.S. patents and has over 80 patent pending technologies. Mr. Joao was also a founder of Electroship (N.Y.), Inc. which was formed to exploit certain patent pending technologies of which Mr. Joao was a co-inventor. Electroship (N.Y.), Inc. was acquired by a public company within six months of its formation. Mr. Joao headed Electroship’s intellectual property and corporate efforts, as well as the merger and acquisition deal leading up to the merger.

Prior to joining Dreier & Baritz, Mr. Joao was head of the Intellectual Property Department at Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Schlissel, P.C. in Mineola, New York. He was also formerly a partner at Anderson Kill & Olick, P.C. in New York in the Intellectual Property Group. Prior to the commencement of his legal career, Mr. Joao was an electrical engineer with Loral Corporation in the Systems Engineering Group, and prior to that was an engineer with Sperry Corporation. Mr. Joao obtained a Bachelor of Science in Electrical Engineering in 1982 and a Master of Science in Electrical Engineering in 1984 from Columbia University School of Engineering and Applied Science. He received his law degree in 1990 from St. John’s University School of Law. Most recently, in 1999, he obtained a Masters in Business Administration in Finance from Baruch College/City University. Mr. Joao is admitted to practice before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, the U.S. District Courts for the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, and the New York State and Connecticut Bars. e-mail: rjoao@dreierbaritz.com.”

January 02, 2009 ~ The WallStreet Journal “Former AUSA Selected as Bankruptcy Trustee in Dreier Case”, quote,

“For a week, it’d been all quiet on the Marc Dreier front. But now a new lawyer is set to be welcomed to the Dreier Party. The NYLJ reports that Sheila M. Gowan (University of Minnesota, Brooklyn Law) has been selected as the bankruptcy trustee in the case. Dreier, founder and sole owner of the law firm Dreier LLP— for those of you took December off — is alleged to have perpetrated a massive fraud against a group of hedge funds. (Here’s our coverage.) Gowan, a former Proskauer associate [Emphasis Added] and AUSA in the Southern District of New York, is now a partner at Diamond McCarthy…”

Again, Investigators should note Proskauer’s direct involvement in the Dreier matters as trustee Gowan was a former Proskauer associate. The conflict is absolute in light of the claims herein, now demanding full disclosure by Gowan and conflict waivers from the victims. When viewed in light of the Joao / Proskauer / Dreier connections described and evidenced already herein, these conflicts will preclude Gowan’s continued involvement. Again, the entire crime depends on continued conflicts of interests that preclude due process and procedure by infiltration of the Criminal Enterprise law firms into Regulatory, Prosecutorial and Court actions against them. The law firms are also well versed in court-orchestrated schemes and with infiltration into regulatory agencies are alleged to use the courts actually to effectuate further frauds. Further evidence of these crimes is at all of the following URL’s, hereby incorporated by reference in entirety herein,

March 03, 2009 ~ USDOJ Letter by Lev L. Dassin, Acting US Attorney to Judge Stuart M. Bernstein. Note that not only Gowan is copied but also Proskauer Attorney Jeffrey W. Levitan, Esq. ( Levitan ) is also copied. The SEC has absolute cause to investigate if Levitan, Gowan and/or Proskauer failed fully to disclose their involvement with Dreier through Joao and the Iviewit matters. Proskauer and presumably Gowan are fully aware of their alleged involvement in my patent theft through my Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit against the Proskauer Rose Law Firm and all their Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, etc.

Failure to disclose this material fact to the Bankruptcy court is allegedly further fraudulent activity. Investigators should also note that the courts have been notified in my legal actions and have obligations through Judicial Cannons to notify the proper authorities of any possible attorney misconduct they are aware of, or face Misprision of Felony charges and more. Thus, the courts should have also notified the SEC of the information given them in official court filings in my lawsuit regarding the Dreier lawsuit, including the correlating information in the Stanford case, which would have forced Gowan’s disclosures regarding her involvement with Proskauer and the Dreier matters and her withdrawal as Trustee.

Again, all this new information is cause for Investigators summoned herein to reinvestigate the Dreier Ponzi in light of these facts and whereby the Dreier Ponzi may be further efforts to launder monies gained from the stolen Intellectual Properties; this would represent additional Fraud Upon a United States Bankruptcy Court. All asset sales and other distributions should instantly be halted until these material facts can be reviewed to determine if these funds are also relating to the Iviewit stolen patents.

Galleon SEC Ongoing Investigation and Convictions

October 16, 2009 SEC Complaint Galleon

NOVEMBER 04, 2009 SEC COMPLAINT GALLEON

With information just beginning in this massive SEC insider trading case, Investigators should again note that several of the key defendants in these matters are also Defendants in my Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, as listed below.

Intel Capital’s Rajiv Goel, indicted by the SEC and Intel Corporation a Central Defendant in my Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

Intel Capital’s, Rajiv Goel, Managing Director at Intel Corporation, implicated by the SEC in the Galleon Complaint. Investigators should take note that one of the first people on the scene at the time of the Iviewit inventions was a one Hassan Miah (“Miah”), who signed NDA’s while analyzing Iviewit as an Investment for EarthLink founders Sky Dylan Dayton and Kevin O’Donnell. Miah had worked at the Intel / Creative Artist Agency (“CAA”) Multimedia Lab prior to involvement with Iviewit and upon viewing the inventions, called them the “Holy Grail” of the Digital Imaging and Video world, including the Internet. Later, Miah again joined Intel at Intel Capital the subject of the Galleon Lawsuit. From Miah’s Biography @ Digital Hollywood, fully incorporated by reference in entirety herein, quote,

Hassan Miah is the former Managing Director of Intel Capital, where he led worldwide media and entertainment investments. Today, he remains an advisor to Intel Corporation’s Digital Home Group, which is responsible for the company’s global consumer PC product line. He is also the former head of New Media for CAA, one of Hollywood’s leading entertainment and talent agencies. While at Intel, Mr. Miah led such media related investments as Bellrock Media, Synacor, Zinio, Black Arrow, Clickstar and Gametrust. At CAA, Mr. Miah established and headed the CAA/Intel Media Lab, the first significant collaboration between Hollywood and a major technology company, and helped form Tele-TV, a joint investment by NYNEX, PacBell and Bell Atlantic to provide interactive video television services over phone lines. Before joining CAA, Mr. Miah was a Management Consulting Partner for KPMG LLP, specializing in media and entertainment transactions. At KPMG, he helped structure such transactions as the sale of MCA Universal Studios to Matsushita, the sale of Geffen Records to Universal and Polygram’s acquisition of A&M Records. Mr. Miah also has extensive operating/managerial experience having developed and sold companies in the digital media sector during his career, e.g., after creating the first consumer MP3 recording software, Mr. Miah successfully sold Xing Technology Corp. to Real Networks at a 10x multiple from when he joined the company less than two years after becoming CEO. Mr. Miah is a CPA and received a B.A. in Business from the University of Michigan and a M.B.A. from Stanford University’s Graduate School of Business.”

Miah’s involvement is also noted in an April 27, 1999 letter from Richard R. Rosman, Esq. to Miah regarding the Iviewit inventions and Proskauer Rose’s Intellectual Property Partner Rubenstein’s opinion on the technologies. Note that Rubenstein and Miah know each other through MPEG and Miah’s former employer XING. Immediately after learning of the Iviewit inventions, Miah sold XING to Real Networks as indicated above.

The following links further identify the relation to Miah and are fully incorporated in entirety by reference herein,

June 01, 1999 – Donald G. Kane, Managing Director at Goldman Sachs letter regarding Hassan Miah and Miah’s letter requesting to speak to Rubenstein.

Roomy Khan, a convicted felon and former Intel employee is pleading guilty in the Galleon case and the relations between Iviewit and Intel are already described herein.

Robert W. Moffat, Jr. ~ Senior Vice President, Integrated Operations at IBM Corporation.

Investigators should note all of the following;

i. IBM is a Defendant in my Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

ii. Defendant William Dick of Defendant Foley & Lardner LLP was former IBM patent counsel for their far eastern patent pooling scheme and Iviewit Patent Counsel.

iii. Defendant Brian Utley, former President of Iviewit was formerly a General Manager at the IBM Boca Raton Florida facility.

iv. Christopher Clarke Wheeler of Proskauer claimed to have been the real estate legal agent for the Boca Raton, IBM facility.

v. Wheeler, Dick and Utley were part of an attempted theft of Intellectual Property from Florida businessperson Monte Friedkin.

vi. Former Chief Judge of the New York courts Chief Judge Judith Kaye was a former IBM lawyer and married to Proskauer Partner Stephen R. Kaye (deceased). Stephen Kaye became an Intellectual Property partner in the Proskauer Intellectual Property group formed immediately after learning of my inventions. Both Judith Kaye and her deceased husband’s estate are Defendants in my Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit.

vii. Wheeler not only introduced Utley to Iviewit with a falsified resume but that Utley, Dick and Wheeler also brought in a one Michael Reale, a former IBM employee to work for Iviewit.

viii. Wheeler and Utley recommended Dick to Iviewit after Joao’s termination from Iviewit and under false pretenses, again failing to notify Iviewit Management, Officers, Board Members and Investors of their prior attempted theft at Friedkin’s business and the resulting loss to Friedkin. Utley also provided a materially false resume for the Wachovia Private Placement.

ix. It is alleged in my Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit that IBM is part of a Criminal Patent Theft Ring committing Fraud Upon the US Patent Office and world Intellectual Property Offices.

x. The recent appointment by President Barack Obama, whom also has been notified of the Iviewit claims as evidenced further herein, of David Kappos (“Kappos”) as Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property. Kappos was a former IBM Vice President and Assistant General Counsel for Intellectual Property.

xi. IBM has also been notified of the same liabilities as described in the Iviewit SEC Complaint defined herein regarding Warner Bros et al. and is believed to have also concealed these liabilities from their Shareholders and where this is again cause for the SEC to investigate IBM to prevent Massive Liabilities to IBM Shareholders.

3. Anil Kumar, Director at McKinsey & Co.

John Calkin’s of Warner Bros. was a former McKinsey employee. Investigators should also note that H. Hickman Powell, of Iviewit’s largest investor, Crossbow Ventures, was also from McKinsey.

4. Ropes & Gray – Arthur Cutillo, Esq. –Intellectual Property Attorney

Investigators should note that Ropes & Gray is directly involved as counsel in the Silicon Graphics, Inc. bankruptcy, whereby Iviewit has already filed papers in that case, exhibited herein.

5. Ropes& Gray - Brien Santarlas – Intellectual Property Attorney

Investigators should note that 3Com is an early purveyor of the Iviewit technologies and under NDA. Investigators should also note that Ropes & Gray has patents listed at its website in digital imaging and video and that patent transfers occurred in SGI’s multiple Bankruptcy cases filed since learning of the Iviewit technologies through Real 3D, Inc. in 1998.

Sullivan & Cromwell ~ Michael Kimelman, Esq.– Sullivan & Cromwell may also be involved in the SGI Bankruptcy case.

“Judicial Corruption is LEGAL and is JUST a Fact of Life. Judicial Corruption - Is Legal and It seems It always Has Been. The Laws are just a set of words to pretend that you have Rights. But the Justice System is Corrupt on every Level and there seems to be No Way to STOP it.” Investigative Blogger Crystal C. Cox, Sunday, January 3, 2010

Background information on Bankers Trust Company criminal felonies in the Southern District of New York (S.D.NY), also involving defense attorneys Davis Polk& Wardwell LLP and Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, as well as, background info on the law firm of White & Case LLP from Forbes & the White & Case website, along with an FBI statement on what corruption is doing to this country, fully incorporated by reference in entirety herein..

Since the Galleon case is unfolding this information represents the initial correlations of several of the key defendants companies that may have further involvement with the Iviewit matters herein described, amendments will be made to this Formal Complaint with all those agencies addressed herein as more information is learned.

7. Iviewit SEC Complaint Filed Against Intel, Lockheed Martin and SGI (Formerly Owners of Real 3D, Inc.)

Please note that this Request for Investigation and Formal Complaint against Warner Bros et al. directly relates to my prior formal complaint to the SEC[30] involving the Intel Corporation, Lockheed Martin, and Silicon Graphics, Inc. These three companies were all owners of the Real3d Inc. company ( later wholly acquired by Intel ), where my Technologies were first tested, used, viewed, approved, validated, Contracted and Licensed under Non Disclosure and other Licensing Agreements. Leading Industry Experts of the three companies at the Real3d Inc. laboratories, similar to Warner Bros et al. completed validation of the novelty of the Intellectual Properties in 1998-1999. Real 3D prior to acquisition by the minority interest owner Intel (20%), were previously located on Lockheed Martin properties in Orlando, Florida. Gerald Stanley was CEO of Real 3D, Inc. until the sale of the company to Intel, whereby Lawrence S. Palley, Director of Business Development for Intel took over the Iviewit agreements.

Footnote [30]

March 25, 2009 SEC COMPLAINT – Real 3D, Inc,, Intel, Silicon Graphics and Lockheed MartinComplaints are on file already with the SEC against these companies for likely fraudulent stock transactions similar to those described herein committed by Warner Bros et al., as well as, likely massive fraud upon their Shareholders, Auditors and Regulators. All transactions, stock transfers, mergers and acquisitions dating back to 1998 should be part of the investigation of these companies, in addition to, likely violations of FASB No. 5 and other corporate accounting rules for failure, at minimum, to book liabilities on the corporate financials. Further fraud may be from failure to provide notice to Shareholders of a 12 Trillion Dollar Liability they have been aware of for close to a decade.

Intel

March 06, 2009 Iviewit Letter of Liabilities to Intel

March 25, 2009 Iviewit SEC Complaint Filed

September 15, 2009 Apple Press Release ~ Intel Counsel Bruce Sewell departs Intel to Apple

January 16, 2002 The Register “SGI transfers 3D graphics patents to MS [Microsoft]

Lockheed

April 16, 2009 Iviewit Letter to Lockheed’s Counsel James Comey Regarding Iviewit Liabilities

April 27, 2009 Iviewit SEC Complaint Against Lockheed

Silicon Graphics Inc.

March 19, 2009 Iviewit Letter to Elena Ramirez regarding SGI Liabilities in the Iviewit matters.

After notification of their liability, on April 01, 2009, SGI then Filed a Chapter 11 Bankruptcy proceeding, without disclosing the liability to the Bankruptcy Court.

Investigators should note the immediate proximity of notice to SGI counsel Elena Ramirez on March 18, 2009 to the filing of the Bankruptcy and where Ramirez fails to the notify the court of the Liabilities she was aware of already, evidencing concealment from the Federal US Bankruptcy Court. This transaction may also trigger Rescissory SGI Shareholder Rights for Fraud involving this transaction.

Investigators should note that all transactions of SGI stock from 1998-Present should be investigated for fraud based on SGI’s involvement with Real 3D, Inc. and as it relates to the Iviewit matters.

Voluntary Petition (Chapter 11). Order for Relief Entered. Filed by Mark R. Somerstein of Ropes & Gray LLP on behalf of Silicon Graphics, Inc.. (Somerstein, Mark) (Entered: 04/01/2009)

April 13, 2009 Inside HPC News “A visual timeline of the rise and sale of SGI”

Timeline of SGI

Vizworld Articles regarding what led to Rise and Fall of SGI

http://www.vizworld.com/?s=iviewit

April 09, 2009 Federal Bankruptcy Complaint Silicon Graphics, Inc. “Emergency Motion to Establish Proof of Claim; Vacate or Modify Order of Sale; Injunction; Priority of Claims; and Other Relief”

May 05, 2009 Ropes & Gray “OBJECTION OF THE DEBTORS TO EMERGENCY MOTION OF ELIOT I. BERNSTEIN TO ESTABLISH PROOF OF CLAIM; VACATE OR MODIFY ORDER OF SALE; INJUNCTION; PRIORITY OF CLAIMS; AND OTHER RELIEF” (related document(s) 102 ) filed by Mark R. Somerstein on behalf of Silicon Graphics, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Original Complaint# 2 Exhibit B - Amended Complaint (Part 1)# 3 Exhibit B - Amended Complaint (Part 2)# 4 Exhibit B - Amended Complaint (Part 3)# 5 Exhibit C - District Court Order) (Somerstein, Mark) (Entered: 05/05/2009)

Objection to Motion

Related Document

# 1 Exhibit A - Original Complaint

#2 Exhibit B - Amended Complaint (Part 1)

# 3 Exhibit B - Amended Complaint (Part 2)

# 4 Exhibit B - Amended Complaint (Part 3)

# 5 Exhibit C - District Court Order)

IVIEWIT BERNSTEIN OBJECTION

May 05, 2009 SGI Counsel Elena Rameriz Declaration to Bankruptcy Court titled, “Affidavit Declaration of Elena Ramirez in Support of the Objection of the Debtors to the Emergency Motion of Eliot I. Bernstein to Establish Proof of Claim; Vacate or Modify Order of Sale; Injunction; Priority of Claims; and Other Relief” filed by Mark R. Somerstein on behalf of Silicon Graphics, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Bernstein Letter to General Counsel of Intel Corporation# 2 Exhibit B - Bernstein Letter to the President of the United States# 3 Exhibit C - Bernstein Complaint to SEC) (Somerstein, Mark) (Entered: 05/05/2009)

May 08, 2009 Eliot Bernstein prepared statement read into record during hearing of SGI Bankruptcy

A copy of this hearing was presumably transcribed into the record and where the SEC and others addressed herein may wish to obtain copies of the hearing as part of this Formal Complaint.

May 08, 2009 – Order Denying “Emergency Motion of Eliot I. Bernstein to Establish Proof of Claim; Vacate or Modify Order of Sale; Injunction; Priority of Claims; and Other Relief.” (Related Doc # 102 , Doc # 318 ) (Tetzlaff, Deanna) (Entered: 05/08/2009)

DOC 2

DOC 3

June 16, 2009 Iviewit “Proof of Claim” SGI Bankruptcy

August 14, 2009 “Motion for Objection to Claim(s)Number: 225 - Objection of the Debtors to Claim of Eliot I. Bernstein with hearing to be held on 9/15/2009 at 10:00 AM at Courtroom 501 (MG) Responses due by 9/10/2009, filed by Mark R. Somerstein on behalf of Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A# 2 Exhibit B - Part 1# 3 Exhibit B- Part 2# 4 Exhibit B - Part 3# 5 Exhibit C - Ramirez Declaration# 6 Exhibit A to Ramirez Declaration# 7 Exhibit B to Ramirez Declaration# 8 Exhibit C to Ramirez Declaration# 9 Exhibit D# 10 Exhibit E# 11 Exhibit F - Gibson Declaration# 12 Exhibit G# 13 Exhibit H - Proposed Order)(Somerstein, Mark) (Entered: 08/14/2009)

Docket for SGI Bankruptcy

August 14, 2009 “Notice of Hearing regarding Objection of the Debtors to Claim of Eliot I. Bernstein(related document(s) 606 ) filed by Mark R. Somerstein on behalf of Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc.. with hearing to be held on 9/15/2009 at 10:00 AM at Courtroom 501 (MG) Objections due by 9/10/2009, (Somerstein, Mark) (Entered: 08/14/2009)”

September 11, 2009 “Response - Claimant - Creditor Eliot I. Bernstein’s Response and Cross Motion to Debtor’s Objections to the Bernstein Proof of Claim” No. 225 filed by Debtor Counsel Ropes and Gray, LLP filed by Eliot I. Bernstein. with hearing to be held on 9/15/2009 at 10:00 AM at Courtroom 501 (MG) (Lopez, Mary) (Entered: 09/11/2009)

September 13, 2009 “Response - Reply Of The Debtors To Claimant Creditor Eliot I. Bernstein’s Response And Cross Motions To Debtor’s Objections To The Bernstein Proof Of Claim No. 225 Filed By Debtor Counsel Ropes and Gray, LLP, And Motion To Estimate The Claim Of Eliot I. Bernstein (related document(s) 660 ) filed by Mark R. Somerstein on behalf of Graphics Properties Holdings, Inc.. with hearing to be held on 9/15/2009 at 10:00 AM at Courtroom 501 (MG) (Somerstein, Mark) (Entered: 09/13/2009)

September 15, 2009 “Order Signed on 9/15/2009 Sustaining the Objection of the Debtors to Claim of Eliot I. Bernstein”. (related document(s) 606 ) (Tetzlaff, Deanna) (Entered: 09/15/2009)

November 19, 2009 “Motion to Compel - Letter to the Clerk’s Office with Motion to Compel and Disqualify and Other Relief Under Rule 9024 and FRCP Rule 60 filed by Eliot Ivan Bernstein.” (Lopez, Mary) (Entered: 11/24/2009)

Investigators should note here that this document was not docketed when received by the court on September 18, 2009.

December 30, 2009 “Order Denying Eliot Bernstein’s (1) Motion for Reconsideration Under Bankruptcy Rule 9024 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 and (2) Motion to Disqualify (Related Doc # 841 ) signed on 12/30/2009” (White, Greg) (Entered: 12/30/2009)

Investigators should note that this document was not served upon me. Again, all those addressed herein, should note how Federal Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn, similar to the US Second Circuit, failed to address the factual conflicts in the case and instead tried to dismiss the complaint while failing to address the conflicts of interest and further conceal the Fraud on the Bankruptcy court. Glenn’s actions reek of illegal behavior, formal criminal complaints will follow this complaint, with all appropriate authorities.

Investigators should intercede in this Bankruptcy on behalf of the Shareholders of SGI. The Bankruptcy attempts to shift intellectual properties may also be related to these matters. Of course, if fraud were determined to have occurred by Executive Officers of Real 3D, Inc., Intel, Lockheed Martin and SGI, again the Shareholders of those companies would have Rescissory Shareholder Rights due to the fraud. Again, the results will be catastrophic, as already described herein and in the former SEC Official Complaints filed against these companies incorporated by reference already herein. Whereby the bankruptcies may represent a shell game scheme through another Fraud on a US Federal Bankruptcy court, attempting to hide and distribute assets to Officers and Directors at the expense of Shareholders, again in violation of a mass of SEC laws.

This Formal Complaint, as it relates to the herein relevant Federal, State and International Crimes may have direct bearing of the Ongoing Investigations of Enron and Andersen and if those investigations are not currently active, this information may be cause for further new Investigations or re-opening prior investigations in light of this information already provided herein.

2004-Present SEC Investigation Regarding Iviewit and Boca Raton, Florida, Police Department regarding Investigations of Stolen Funds and Intellectual Properties. SEC Investigators claim that statements made by the Boca Raton Police Department were false regarding a two-year SEC investigation that the SEC was supposed to have been conducting with the Boca PD per detectives at the Boca PD. SEC agents involved denied ever being informed or jointly working on any investigation with the Boca PD and further denied that they were invited to a meeting at the Boca Raton PD that the Boca PD stated they would be attending. Based on these false claims by the Boca PD, the agents involved at the SEC claimed they were beginning an investigation of the matters at that time.

October 07, 2004 Iviewit Petition to the Florida Supreme Court regarding the SEC and Boca Raton, FL Police Department Bogus Joint Investigation

October 08, 2004 Supplemental Petition to Florida Supreme Court Regarding SEC and Boca Raton Police Department Bogus Joint Investigation

August 28, 2003 Written Statement to Boca Raton PD Regarding Stolen Funds, Including SBA funds

September 02, 2003 Written Statement to Boca Raton PD Regarding Stolen Intellectual Property @

VII. THE REVOLVING DOOR OF CONFLICTS FROM “FAVORED” LAW FIRMS TO THE COURTS, TO PROSECUTORIAL OFFICES, TO REGULATORY OFFICES, TO OVERSIGHT AGENCIES AND THEN BACK AGAIN ~ THE CRIMINAL GOLDEN PARACHUTE THAT LED TO THE CONTROLLED DEMOLITION OF WALL STREET AND WORLD MARKETS, THE LARGEST CRIMINAL THEFT IN US HISTORY

Anderson’s allegations expose a Gang, a Criminal RICO Organization that has committed more than the necessary Predicate Acts of RICO to satisfy a Criminal RICO brought by the Department of Justice. Again this CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATION is mainly comprised of corrupted “FAVORED LAW FIRMS AND LAWYERS” and their clientele, including but not limited to, Court Officials, Prosecutors and Regulators, all Violating masses of Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules& Regulations and State & Federal Law. Further, the Gang has members who infiltrate Public Office with intent to Violate Law, laws they are sworn under Oath to G-d and the People to uphold. The RICO Organization, using legal degrees to gain entry to Government posts, has infiltrated these agencies from the top down in order to facilitate the crimes with government cover, a subterfuge according to Anderson, of the highest posts at the US Attorney, the DA, the ADA, the New York Supreme Court and all of their corresponding Regulatory Agencies. The picture that emerges is of a Coup D’état on parts of New York and US Government Agencies by these Law Firms and Lawyers, of all those agencies necessary to operate their Criminal RICO Enterprise FREE OF PROSECUTION. The infiltration into Government, a central component of almost all Criminal RICO Lawsuits, is necessary to cover-up the crimes and hold off investigations while creating a fraudulent façade of Justice and Due Process or using brute force and threats when necessary, all as evidenced herein.

The Scheme to deny Due Process through Obstruction of Justice is simple to see with hindsight, after learning of Anderson’s inside Whistleblower claims, which clearly paints the Gang of corrupted “Favored Law Firms & Lawyers,”committing sophisticated illegal legal crimes through intentional and maniacal misuse of their intimate knowledge of the law. The Criminal Enterprise operating through these Law Firms and Lawyers creates a “Revolving Door” of lawyers conspiring to Aid and Abet cover-ups inside the Government and the Courts of the Crimes being committed by the various Law Firms involved. The Criminals, disguised as Attorneys at Law/Public Servants, act on behalf of the Criminal RICO Organization and are plant deep inside ALL the critical Government Agencies necessary to derail any complaints against them. If necessary, to preclude prosecution, these Attorneys at Law/Public Servants revert to more nefarious acts such as; Threatening Federal Witnesses, Destroying Whistleblower lives by turning the System of Jurisprudence Against them, Altering Official Records, Destroying Official Records, Committing Fraud Upon the Courts, Whitewashing Attorney Disciplinary Complaints and Prosecutorial Complaints. All with the aid of a “Cleaner,” and well, you get the picture, a Government that looks more like Crime Inc.

If you are one of the Victims of these insidious crimes, Anderson’s riveting revelations were a “Told You So” moment. Prior to this knowledge, the Conspiracy operated secretly and effectively, making the Victims of this LEGAL ABUSE feel paranoid and insane for many years prior, leaving them Victims of what has been defined as LEGAL ABUSE SYNDROME[31], in addition to the Abuse already suffered at the hands of their once trusted counsel. This abuse destroys the victims’ lives and faith in our System of Jurisprudence, leaving the Victims further Victimized, leading to shattered homes, marriages, financial depravation and feeling that there is nowhere and no one to turn to for help. In cases, like my own, when legal abuse alone is not enough to drive the Victim into the ground and normal intimidations fail, the RICO Organization is capable of ATTEMPTED MURDER through MOB STYLED CAR BOMBINGS.

That is where the kids would have been!

That is where the kids would have been!

You can imagine just how difficult it has become for my wife and me to start the car in the morning to take our children to school. Due to the incredibly effective planting inside the government of the CRIMINAL RICO ORG., the FBI agents investigating the Iviewit matters have disappeared, according to the FBI, along with the Iviewit Patent and Bombing Files. Again derailing investigations and thus prosecution of those involved for several years now and elevating the matters to the Department of Justice Inspector General and the Department of Justice Office of Professional Responsibility.

The reality of the situation is overwhelming, as it presents a clear picture of how even Wall Street/Greed Street has melted down through CRIMINAL ACTS ALL COMMITTED BY ATTORNEYS and THEIR CORPORATE CLIENTELE usingfraudulent legal instruments[32]. YET, WITHOUT a SINGLE ARREST of the ATTORNEYS AT LAW involved in the creation of every FRAUDULENT document, which facilitated all of the rampant Fraudulent Financial Crimes. Anderson’s depiction further paints a picture where all those fingered by Anderson, including the New York Attorney General’s Office, whom are all responsible for regulating and prosecuting misconduct and financial FRAUD on Wall Street, are instead in bed together scratching and watching each other’s backs.

Footnote [31] Citizens for Judicial Accountability Inc.

Footnote [32]

“Deutsche Bank lied, U.S. says Lender ‘lied’ to get into federal home-loan insurance program: suit” By Alistair Barr, MarketWatch May 3, 2011Again, it is critical to note here that behind all of these Wall Street/Greed Street Frauds are CORRUPTED LAW FIRMS and LAWYERS creating the documentation for every single one of these financial frauds occurring. Behind every unprosecuted financial fraud, including but not limited to, the mortgage/housing frauds, the banking frauds, the stock frauds, the derivative frauds, the tax shelter frauds, the Ponzi Schemes/Criminal Law Firm Money Laundering Schemes and the TARP frauds, etc., lay prevaricatory lawyers. The Law Firms and Lawyers that compose the RICO Organization have not only failed to fulfill their legal obligations to the PEOPLE but have actively participated and profited from these crimes with their corporate clientele[33]. The Public Officials, mostly Lawyers from Law Firms, have aided and abetted the CRIMINAL RICO ORGANIZATION at every step. From commission of the crimes, through creation of the illegal fraudulent ‘legal’ documents, to the Obstruction of Investigations and Lawsuits within the Government and Courts, all with the intent of robbing the People and then denying them their Rights to their Properties that they Convert.

Footnote [33]

“New York Investigates Banks’ Role in Fiscal Crisis” By GRETCHEN MORGENSON, Published: May 16, 2011, © 2011 The New York Times CompanyFurther, supporting evidence of this CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE committing MASS FRAUD can be found in the April 13, 2011, Report by the United States Senate, PERMANENT SUBCOMMITTEE ON INVESTIGATIONS, Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs. The Committee is Chaired by Hon. Carl Levin and assisted in bipartisan fashion by Tom Coburn, Ranking Minority Member and is titled WALL STREET AND THE FINANCIAL CRISIS: Anatomy of a Financial Collapse.The Report is located at the following URL, hereby fully incorporated in entirety by reference herein.

This detailed stinging report alleges fraud over 200 times in 650 pages, yet still NOT A SINGLE ARREST, while most of this Criminal Activity defined in the report is continues to take place in New York, and why not, when the “Fox‘Fix’ is in the Henhouse?” Crime Pays when no one is protecting the People[34] and Justice is complicit in the crimes. One must ask where the New York Attorney General and the Governor of New York are, the “Sheriffs” of Wall Street, whom instead look more like Criminal Accomplices disguised as Sheriffs. Who are these“Barney Fife” Sheriffs, again we find more lawyers, all with interests in the controlled demolition of the markets betting against the People, as they have disabled Justice. Further, reports[35] show overwhelmingly that regulators “failed” to regulate, appearing asleep at the wheel but look deeper and you will find the Regulators, again, mostly attorneys, were both complicit and essential to the actual commissioning of the financial frauds, which directly benefit the RICO Criminal Enterprise Law Firms. The “regulators” feign regulatory “failures”when the schemes are exposed and then leave their government posts and almost immediately enter the “Revolving Door” of the Criminal Law Firms[36] with a Golden Partnership awaiting. The Lawmakers and Law Firms began removing regulations several years ago and, on information and belief, this deregulation had a CRIMINAL ulterior motive of opening the door/floodgate for the financial crimes to be committed and purposefully lead to the CONTROLLED DEMOLITION of the MARKETS to benefit the few, mostly the Law Firms and their Criminal Clientele. They now try to hide their Criminal Acts inside the Regulatory Agencies, by referring to them as resulting from “lax regulators” and “deregulation[37]” their cover story in efforts to evade investigations and prosecution.

—–

Footnotes 34-37

Footnote [34] “Cuomo And Geithner Skated” Investor’s Business Daily, IBD Editorial


Cuomo, affirmative-action lender. AP

Footnote [35]

Additional reports citing “regulatory failures:”

1. U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Office of Investigations

“Investigation of Failure of the SEC to Uncover Bernard Madoff’s Ponzi Scheme” August 31, 2009 Report No. OIG-509 477 Pages

****** Jacqueline Wood who transferred from the SEC to a PROSKAUER ROSE PARTNERSHIP, is mentioned 102 times in fact, as the central “failure” of the regulatory process!!!

JACQUELINE WOOD PERRELL; aka Jacqueline Wood, Jacqueline Murray Wood, Former OCIE Attorney Advisor, aka Witness Number 7, Witness 7, Witness No. 7, Witness #7 UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION In the Matter of File No. GIG-509 GIG-509 WITNESS: Number Bc

2. “Lawmakers Sink Teeth Into the SEC - Agency Mocked for Not Catching Madoff” by Frank Ahrens Washington Post Staff Writer Thursday, February 5, 2009

3. REPORT OF INVESTIGATION - UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION OFFICE OF INSPECTOR GENERAL Case No. OIG-526 “Investigation of the SEC’s Response to Concerns Regarding Robert Allen Stanford’s Alleged Ponzi Scheme” March 31, 2010

4. “Report Finds Catastrophic Failure By SEC In Stanford Ponzi Case” by Justin Elliott | April 19, 2010, TPM Media LLC.

5. “Former S.E.C. Official Said to Be Subject of Criminal Inquiry” By EDWARD WYATT Published: May 13, 2011, The New York Times Company

6. “Why Isn’t Wall Street in Jail? Financial crooks brought down the world’s economy — but the feds are doing more to protect them than to prosecute them” Illustration by Victor Juhasz By Matt Taibbi

February 16, 2011 Rolling Stone / Wenner Media

7. “Michael Moore on Rachel Maddow MSNBC Video Clip.” “This is what’s coming for you. [Holds up a pair of HANDCUFFS] You’ve taken our money, we want the money back. You’ve taken our jobs overseas, we want those jobs back. … We’re mad as hell and we’re not going to take it anymore!” — Michael Moore

8. “The People vs. Goldman Sachs ~ A Senate committee has laid out the evidence. Now the Justice Department should bring criminal charges” By Matt Taibbi, May 11, 2011 , The Rolling Stone

9. New York Media LLC / New York Magazine SERIES

a. “The Post-Crash: Wall Street Won. So why is it so worried?” New York Media LLC / New York Magazine

cuomo-2cuomo-3

b. “Revolver- Why do some of the most capable public servants in America, people like economist Peter Orszag, keep circling back from Washington to Wall Street? One guess.” By Gabriel Sherman

Published Apr 10, 2011 New York Media LLC / New York Magazine

c. “The Wall Street Mind: Triumphant…To the victors belong the spoils, right?” By John Heilemann Published Apr 10, 2011 New York Media LLC / New York Magazine

cuomo-4cuomo-5

Stage 1 (left), Stage 2 (right) Stage 3 (left), Stage 4 (right)

(Photo: Joerg Klaus/Bransch)

d. “The Wall Street Mind: Anxious…Now they’re getting paid … But where will the next big paydays come from?”By John Gapper Published Apr 10, 2011 New York Media LLC / New York Magazine

e. “The Wall Street Mind: Oblivious - At Davos, the Champagne is flowing again—a rain dance to keep the money flowing their way.” By Felix Salmon Published Apr 10, 2011 New York Media LLC / New York Magazine

f. “The Next Best Crooks - With the masterminds of the financial crisis having escaped justice, United States Attorney Preet Bharara is left to prosecute this generation of insider traders. But is he too aggressive? And how valuable is second prize, anyway?” By Robert Kolker Published Apr 10, 2011

cuomo-6

Clockwise from top left: Rajiv Goel, Lloyd Blankfein, Rajat Gupta, Raj Rajaratnam, and Danielle Chiesi.

(Photo: Lipo Ching/Mercury News (Goel); Jemal Countess/Getty (Blankfein); Umesh Goswam/The India Today Group/Getty (Gupta); Jin Lee/Bloomberg via Getty (Rajaratnam, Chiesi); Getty (courtroom); C Squared Studios/Getty (Confidential); Mark Scott/Getty (Money). Illustrations by Gluekit.)

10. “Leaked report brands NYSE regulatory failure” by Simon English Telegraph Media Group Limited 04 Nov 2003

11. “S.E.C. Concedes Oversight Flaws Fueled Collapse” by STEPHEN LABATON New York Times Published: September 26, 2008

12. “Lax Oversight Caused Crisis, Bernanke Says” by CATHERINE RAMPELL New York Times Published: January 3, 2010

13. “SEC Rebuked for Regulatory Failure With Lehman Brothers” by Marian Wang ProPublica, April 20, 2010 @

Therefore, not one Regulator/Lawyer has been prosecuted for any of their massive“ Regulatory Failures” aka Criminal Failures, as the Prosecutors and Regulators[38] appear holding the door open, as accomplices, as the loot is carted off. In fact, after their government disservices the “REGULATORS”/CROOKS, appear then to enter the never-ending “Revolving Door” to the Corrupt Law Firms, leaving their government posts and landing for the most part INSTANT PARTNERSHIPS with, you guessed it, Law Firms, where many came from in the first place. In many instances, as evidenced herein, Regulators and Public Officials then leave to Law Firms that economically benefited by their intentional “failures” and “deregulation” while securing instant lucrative Golden Partnerships in most instances, as if their cut of loot was waiting in their Golden Partnership interests, a pot of gold at the end of the rainbow of PUBLIC DISSERVICE. One must question why in many instances, the lawyers are leaving multimillion-dollar law firm Partnerships in the first place, to take low-income government jobs, certainly not from benevolence, a characteristic long since gone with ethics in law.

Footnote [36]

“Revolving Regulators: SEC Faces Ethic Challenges with Revolving Door” May 13, 2011, Project On Government Oversight (POGO), fully incorporated in entirety by reference herein.

“Citing Revolving Door, Watchdog Report Questions SEC’s Independence” by Brian Baxter, The American Lawyer, May 17, 2011—

—-

Footnote [37]

Removal of the Glass–Steagall Act of 1932 and other regulatory barrier/protections by Lawmakers (again, note mostly lawyers) and Law Firms created an intentional portal for committing the very crimes the legislations were intended to Prohibit. This has lead to the Wild West lawlessness that has consumed Wall Street/Greed Street since, while destroying Main Street in a CONTROLLED CRIMINAL DEMOLITION, wiping out the middle class and leaving the nation bankrupt.

“The repeal of provisions of the Glass-Steagall Act of 1933 by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act effectively removed the separation that previously existed between Wall Street investment banks and depository banks. This repeal directly contributed to the severity of the Financial crisis of 2007–2010.[4][5][6][7][8]”… The repeal enabled commercial lenders such as Citigroup, which was in 1999 the largest U.S. bank by assets, to underwrite and trade instruments such as mortgage-backed securities and collateralized debt obligations and establish so-called structured investment vehicles, or SIVs, that bought those securities.[21] Elizabeth Warren,[22] author and one of the five outside experts who constitute the Congressional Oversight Panel of the Troubled Asset Relief Program, has said that the repeal of this act contributed to the Global financial crisis of 2008–2009.[23][24]…The year before the repeal, sub-prime loans were just five percent of all mortgage lending.[citation needed] By the time the credit crisis peaked in 2008, they were approaching 30 percent.[citation needed] This correlation is not necessarily an indication of causation however, as there are several other significant events that have impacted the sub-prime market during that time. These include the adoption of mark-to-market accounting, implementation of the Basel Accords and the rise of adjustable rate mortgages.[30]”

953

Footnote 38

[38]“Critics slam SEC’s ‘revolving door’ ~ New report supports assertions that large number of ex-commission employees represent outside clients before the agency” By Mark Schoeff Jr., May 13, 2011 Crain Communications Inc.

Anderson exposed the “Revolving Door” of corruption between the RICO Criminal Enterprise and the Courts and the Prosecutorial Offices, yet Prosecutors fail to investigate even “The Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein or the PERJURER IN FEDERAL COURT THOMAS CAHILL. Instead, we find the US District Court and US Second Circuit (“Circus”) courts AIDING and ABETTING the Criminal RICO Org. in efforts to derail her Lawsuit, prior to full formal investigations of anyone. Hot Potato!!! Obviously, this INTENTIONAL FAILURE TO LITIGATE, INVESTIGATE AND PROSECUTE is because the guilty parties cannot and will not call for investigation and prosecution of themselves and the Criminal RICO Org. they are beholden too. One must question why Anderson was forced to bring her Whistleblower Lawsuit in a Federal Civil Court when almost all of the accusations are CRIMINAL but where else could she turn when the WALL OF CORRUPTION that she fingered is composed of ALL those responsible for CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS and PROSECUTIONS? Anderson and many of the “Legally Related” Lawsuits have called for a FEDERAL MONITOR to intervene as required by Law, one free of Conflicts of Interest. The calls made to Prosecutors and the Courts to now follow Law and Procedural Rules have thus far landed on deaf ears.

Therefore, this letter requests whomever the New York Attorney General replaces themselves with in these matters going forward, to avoid conflict, would have to be an attorney/prosecutor that lives and works outside of the Conflict Swamp in New York and perhaps is NOT a LAWYER. Certainly not a lawyer who works for any of the “Favored Law Firms” or any of the accused Defendants in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, including but not limited to, lawyers registered with any of the Courts or Court Agencies sued in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit. The conflicted parties include but not limited to, the New York Supreme Court, the New York Second Circuit, the Virginia Supreme Court, the Florida Supreme Court and the Bar Associations/Disciplinary Departments in those three states and any of the thousands of Lawyers/Criminals/Defendants who work at any of the Law Firms sued. Finally, a PROSECUTOR/FEDERAL MONITOR must be found who will sign and affirm the attached Conflict of Interest disclosure form, prior to ANY actions.

Finally, the following Crime Chart illustrates how just one law firm, Proskauer Rose, has been found in a multiplicity of criminal frauds under investigation and the “Revolving Door” their Law Firm has had with Government Agents and Court Officials involved in the Criminal Frauds.

cuomo-7-chart

VIII. Relief sought

1. Investigate Emily Cole to determine if she is related to Andrew Cuomo and investigate the Conflict of Interest created by her handling complaint information for her boss, Steven Michael Cohen. Please take this letter as an OFFICIAL COMPLAINT to the New York Attorney General and Open and New and Separate Case File No. for Investigation.

2. Investigate Steven M. Cohen and Andrew Cuomo for further Conflict of Interest in handling complaint matters where he is a complained of party in several Criminal Complaint filed. Please take this letter as an OFFICIAL COMPLAINT to the New York Attorney General and Open and New and Separate Case File No. for Investigation.

3. Remove the New York Attorney General from further representations in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, the Anderson Whistleblower Lawsuit and all “Legally Related” Lawsuits and replace them with INDEPENDENT NON CONFLICTED LEGAL COUNSEL.

4. Remove the New York Attorney General from handling Iviewit Criminal Complaints filed with the Attorney General’s office dating back to those filed with the Spitzer Administration and have them submitted again for re-review by a NON CONFLICTED SPECIAL PROSECUTOR/FEDERAL MONITOR, noting the prior Conflicts as CRIMINAL ACTS.

5. Replace the New York Attorney General with NON-CONFLICTED INDEPENDENT COUNSEL in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit for not only the New York State Attorney General’s Office, New York State Attorney General Officials already named herein but also ALL State/Actor Defendants already defined herein and in my RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit and Anderson’s Whistleblower Lawsuit.

6. Notify the State Actors/Defendants in the Iviewit RICO& ANTITRUST Lawsuit, the Anderson Whistleblower Lawsuit and the “Legally Related” Lawsuits that due to ADMITTED AND ACKNOWLEDGED Conflicts of Interest at the Attorney General’s office, they must seek new NON CONFLICTED INDEPENDENT COUNSEL, separate counsel, to represent them both Professionally and Individually.

7. Send notice to all parties listed herein of the Conflicts of Interest identified by the New York Attorney General and that any submission by the New York Attorney General’s Office in any Criminal Complaint and/or Court Filing was tendered in Conflict and thereby invalidated.

8. Begin immediate investigations of the Iviewit Criminal Complaints defined herein and in exhibit and notify Courts adjudicating any Ponzi Schemes listed herein, or other financial crimes listed herein, of the relationship of these schemes to the Iviewit Criminal Complaints. Seek an Order to Halt these cases and freeze any asset distribution until such time that these matters can be evaluated in light of the suppressed Iviewit information.

9. Witness Protection paid for by New York State for Anderson and ALL “Legally Related” Lawsuits. ALL of these “Legally Related” Whistleblowers are in DANGER based on, as yet uninvestigated claims of EXTORTIONARY THREATS ON A FEDERAL WITNESS, Nicole Corrado, a New York Supreme Court Official, made by SENIOR NEW YORK SUPREME COURT OFFICIALS and a CAR BOMBING ATTEMPTED MURDER OF INVENTOR ELIOT BERNSTEIN AND FAMILY, as already defined herein.

10. Secure and Retain Records and make Copies of Records from ALL Iviewit/Eliot Bernstein Proceedings and Complaints, now necessary from all Government Agencies involved in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit and that have had formal complaints filed with their offices, due to the Anderson’s eyewitness testimony of File Tampering, Destruction & Altercation of Official Records. Copies of Records, in entirety, dating back to 2000 and forward to today’s date are formally requested by this Letter, in order to verify the veracity of the Public Records against what was filed. Iviewit and Eliot I. Bernstein Proceedings must be copied and delivered to Eliot Bernstein/Iviewit at the address, 2753 NW 34th St. Boca Raton, Florida 33434, from all of the following agencies;

i. The New York Attorney General & The New York Attorney General Office of Public Integrity – Copies of all Files and Records regarding Iviewit and Eliot I. Bernstein

ii. The New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department

iii. The New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee

iv. The New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department

v. The New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee

vi. The United States District Court Southern District of New York records for the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuits

vii. The United States Second Circuit Court of Appeals records for the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit

viii. The Department of Justice, United States Attorney Office ~ New York

ix. The District Attorney ~ New York.

11. If the Receiver of this letter does not tender a Written Response to this Letter/Complaint within 10 business days, please be advised that your name may be included in future criminal Obstruction & RICO investigations. Please also take note that any review or adjudication on these matters by ANY party, prior to a full and formal Written and Affirmed, Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form will automatically result in Criminal Charges being filed against you for OBSTRUCTION of JUSTICE and RICO related crimes, as already defined herein.

12. Notify State & Federal Auditors of Twelve Count Twelve Trillion Dollar Liability against State of New York Prosecutorial Agencies and Courts.

13. Notify State & Federal Auditors of Legal Fee issues defined already herein.

EXHIBIT 1 – PARTIAL LIST OF KNOWN CONFLICTED PARTIES

· Proskauer Rose, LLP; Alan S. Jaffe - Chairman Of The Board - (”Jaffe”); Kenneth Rubenstein - (”Rubenstein”); Robert Kafin - Managing Partner -(”Kafin”); Christopher C. Wheeler - (”Wheeler”); Steven C. Krane - (”Krane”); Stephen R. Kaye - (”S. Kaye”) and in his estate with New York Supreme Court Chief Judge Judith Kaye (“J. Kaye”); Matthew Triggs - (”Triggs”); Christopher Pruzaski - (”Pruzaski”); Mara Lerner Robbins - (”Robbins”); Donald Thompson -(”Thompson”); Gayle Coleman; David George; George A. Pincus; Gregg Reed; Leon Gold - (”Gold”); Albert Gortz - (”Gortz”); Marcy Hahn-Saperstein; Kevin J. Healy - (”Healy”); Stuart Kapp; Ronald F. Storette; Chris Wolf; Jill Zammas; FULL LIST OF 601 liable Proskauer Partners; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Proskauer partner, affiliate, company, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Proskauer ROSE LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Proskauer related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· MELTZER, LIPPE, GOLDSTEIN, WOLF & SCHLISSEL, P.C.; Lewis Melzter - (”Meltzer”); Raymond Joao - (”Joao”); Frank Martinez - (”Martinez”); Kenneth Rubenstein - (”Rubenstein”); FULL LIST OF 34 Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C. liable Partners; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C. partner, affiliate, company, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C.; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein, Wolf & Schlissel, P.C. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· FOLEY & LARDNER LLP; Ralf Boer (”Boer”); Michael Grebe (“Grebe”); Christopher Kise (“Kise”); William J. Dick - (”Dick”); Steven C. Becker -(”Becker”); Douglas Boehm - (”Boehm”); Barry Grossman -(”Grossman”); Jim Clark - (”Clark”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Foley & Lardner partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Foley & Lardner; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Foley & Lardner related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP; Richard Schiffrin - (”Schiffrin”); Andrew Barroway -(”Barroway”); Krishna Narine - (”Narine”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Schiffrin & Barroway, LLP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP; Norman Zafman - (”Zafman”); Thomas Coester -(”Coester”); Farzad Ahmini - (”Ahmini”); George Hoover -(”Hoover”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Blakely Sokoloff Taylor & Zafman LLP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP; Martyn W. Molyneaux - (”Molyneaux”); Michael Dockterman - (”Dockterman”); FULL LIST OF 198 Wildman, Harrold, Allen& Dixon LLP liable Partners; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Wildman, Harrold, Allen& Dixon LLP; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Christopher & Weisberg, P.A.; Alan M. Weisberg - (”Weisberg”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Christopher & Weisberg, P.A. partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Christopher & Weisberg, P.A.; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Christopher & Weisberg, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· YAMAKAWA INTERNATIONAL PATENT OFFICE; Masaki Yamakawa - (”Yamakawa”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Yamakawa International Patent Office partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Yamakawa International Patent Office; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Yamakawa International Patent Office related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· GOLDSTEIN LEWIN& CO.; Donald J. Goldstein - (”Goldstein”); Gerald R. Lewin -(”Lewin”); Erika Lewin - (”E. Lewin”); Mark R. Gold; Paul Feuerberg; Salvatore Bochicchio; Marc H. List; David A. Katzman; Robert H. Garick; Robert C. Zeigen; Marc H. List; Lawrence A. Rosenblum; David A. Katzman; Brad N. Mciver; Robert Cini; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Goldstein & Lewin Co. partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Goldstein & Lewin Co.; Partners, Associates, Of Counsel, Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Goldstein & Lewin Co. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· INTEL Corporation;

· Silicon Graphics Inc.;

· Lockheed Martin Corporation;

· Real 3D, Inc. (SILICON GRAPHICS, INC., LOCKHEED MARTIN & INTEL) & RYJO; Gerald Stanley - (”Stanley”); Ryan Huisman - (”Huisman”); RYJO -(”RYJO”); Tim Connolly - (”Connolly”); Steve Cochran; David Bolton; Rosalie Bibona - (”Bibona”); Connie Martin; Richard Gentner; Steven A. Behrens; Matt Johannsen; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel)& RYJO partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin & Intel) & RYJO; Employees, Corporations, Affiliates and any other Intel, Real 3D, Inc. (Silicon Graphics, Inc., Lockheed Martin& Intel) & RYJO related or affiliated entities, and any successor companies both individually and professionally;

· Tiedemann Investment Group; Bruce T. Prolow (”Prolow”); Carl Tiedemann (”C. Tiedemann”); Andrew Philip Chesler; Craig L. Smith; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Tiedemann Investment Group partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Tiedemann Investment Group and any other Tiedemann Investment Group related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners; Stephen J. Warner- (”Warner”); Rene P. Eichenberger - (”Eichenberger”); H. Hickman Hank Powell - (”Powell”); Maurice Buchsbaum -(”Buchsbaum”); Eric Chen - (”Chen”); Avi Hersh; Matthew Shaw - (”Shaw”); Bruce W. Shewmaker - (”Shewmaker”); Ravi M. Ugale - (”Ugale”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners and any other Crossbow Ventures / Alpine Partners related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· BROAD & CASSEL; James J. Wheeler - (”J. Wheeler”); Kelly Overstreet Johnson -(”Johnson”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Broad & Cassell partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Broad & Cassell and any other Broad & Cassell related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· FORMER IVIEWIT MANAttorney GeneralEMENT & BOARD; Brian G. Utley/Proskauer Referred Management - (”Utley”); Raymond Hersh - (”Hersh”)/; Michael Reale - (”Reale”)/Proskauer Referred Management; Rubenstein/Proskauer Rose Shareholder in Iviewit - Advisory Board; Wheeler/Proskauer Rose Shareholder in Iviewit - Advisory Board; Dick/Foley & Lardner - Advisory Board, Boehm/Foley & Lardner - Advisory Board; Becker/Foley & Lardner; Advisory Board; Joao/Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel - Advisory Board; Kane/Goldman Sachs - Board Director; Lewin/Goldstein Lewin - Board Director; Ross Miller, Esq. (“Miller”),Prolow/Tiedemann Prolow II - Board Director; Powell/Crossbow Ventures/Proskauer Referred Investor - Board Director; Maurice Buchsbaum - Board Director; Stephen Warner - Board Director; Simon L. Bernstein – Board Director (“S. Bernstein”);any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Former Iviewit Management & Board partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Former Iviewit Management & Board and any other Former Iviewit Management & Board related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT - WEST PALM BEACH FLORIDA; Judge Jorge LABARGA -(”Labarga”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT - WEST PALM BEACH FLORIDA staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time. Hereinafter, collectively referred to as (”15C”);

· THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE; Thomas Cahill - (”Cahill”); Joseph Wigley -(”Wigley”); Steven Krane, any other John Doe (”John Doe”) of THE SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION: FIRST JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time;

· THE FLORIDA BAR; Lorraine Christine Hoffman - (”Hoffman”); Eric Turner -(”Turner”); Kenneth Marvin - (”Marvin”); Anthony Boggs -(”Boggs”); Joy A. Bartmon - (”Bartmon”); Kelly Overstreet Johnson - (”Johnson”); Jerald Beer - (”Beer”); Matthew Triggs; Christopher or James Wheeler; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) The Florida Bar staff, known or not known to have been involved at the time;

· MPEGLA, LLC. – Kenneth Rubenstein, Patent Evaluator; Licensors and Licensees, please visit www.mpegla.com for a complete list; Columbia University; Fujitsu Limited; General Instrument Corp; Lucent Technologies Inc.; Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd.; Mitsubishi Electric Corp.; Philips Electronics N.V. (Philips); Scientific Atlanta, Inc.; Sony Corp. (Sony); EXTENDED LIST OF MPEGLA LICENSEES AND LICENSORS; any other John Doe MPEGLA, LLC. Partner, Associate, Engineer, Of Counsel or Employee; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) MPEGLA, LLC partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to MPEGLA, LLC and any other MPEGLA, LLC related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· DVD6C LICENSING GROUP - Licensors and Licensees, please visit www.mpegla.com for a complete list; Toshiba Corporation; Hitachi, Ltd.; Matsushita Electric Industrial Co. Ltd.; Mitsubishi Electric Corporation; Time Warner Inc.; Victor Company Of Japan, Ltd.; EXTENDED DVD6C DEFENDANTS; any other John Doe DVD6C LICENSING GROUP Partner, Associate, Engineer, Of Counsel or Employee; any other John Doe (”John Doe”) DVD6C LICENSING GROUP partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to DVD6C LICENSING GROUP and any other DVD6C LICENSING GROUP related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Harrison Goodard Foote incorporating Brewer & Son; Martyn Molyneaux, Esq. (“Molyneaux”); Any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Harrison Goodard Foote (incorporating Brewer & Son) partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Harrison Goodard Goote incorporating Brewer& Son and any other related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman of the Grievance Committee of the Second Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee;

· James E. Peltzer, Clerk of the Court of the Appellate Division, Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Judicial Department; Diana Kearse, Chief Counsel to the Grievance Committee of the Second Judicial Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee;

· Houston & Shahady, P.A., any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Houston & Shahady, P.A., affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Houston & Shahady, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Furr & Cohen, P.A. any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Furr & Cohen, P.A., affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Furr & Cohen, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim & Simowitz, P.A., affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Moskowitz, Mandell, Salim& Simowitz, P.A. related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. Jeffrey Friedstein (“Friedstein”); Sheldon Friedstein (S. Friedstein”), Donald G. Kane (“Kane”); any other John Doe (”John Doe”) The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. partners, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. and any other related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· David B. Simon, Esq. (“D. Simon”);

· Sachs Saxs & Klein, PA any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Sachs Saxs & Klein, PA, affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Sachs Saxs & Klein, PA related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Huizenga Holdings Incorporated any other John Doe (”John Doe”) Huizenga Holdings Incorporated affiliates, companies, known or not known at this time; including but not limited to Huizenga Holdings Incorporated related or affiliated entities both individually and professionally;

· Davis Polk & Wardell;

· Ropes & Gray LLP;

· Sullivan & Cromwell LLP;

· Eliot I. Bernstein, (“Bernstein”) a resident of the State of California, and former President (Acting) of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. and its affiliates and subsidiaries and the founder of Iviewit and principal inventor of its technology;

· P. Stephen Lamont, (“Lamont”) a resident of the State of New York, and former Chief Executive Officer (Acting) of Iviewit Holdings, Inc. and all of its affiliates and subsidiaries;

· SKULL AND BONES; The Russell Trust Co.; Yale Law School;

· Council on Foreign Relations;

· The Bilderberg Group;

· The Federalist Society;

· The Bradley Foundation;

Please include in the COI check the defendants and any other parties in the legally related cases in New York District Court Southern District of New York to Docket No 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT, including but not limited to;

A. United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 08-4873-cv

B. (07cv11196) Bernstein et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. - TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT Defendants, in addition to those already listed herein, include but are not limited to;

· STATE OF NEW YORK;

· THE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM;

· STEVEN C. KRANE in his official and individual Capacities for the New York State Bar Association and the Appellate Division First Department Departmental disciplinary Committee, and, his professional and individual capacities as a Proskauer partner;

· ESTATE OF STEPHEN KAYE, in his professional and individual capacities;

· MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer;

· JON A. BAUMGARTEN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· SCOTT P. COOPER, in his professional and individual capacities;

· BRENDAN J. O’ROURKE, in his professional and individual capacities;

· LAWRENCE I. WEINSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· WILLIAM M. HART, in his professional and individual capacities;

· DARYN A. GROSSMAN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· JOSEPH A. CAPRARO JR., in his professional and individual capacities;

· JAMES H. SHALEK; in his professional and individual capacities;

· GREGORY MASHBERG, in his professional and individual capacities;

· JOANNA SMITH, in her professional and individual capacities;

· TODD C. NORBITZ, in his professional and individual capacities;

· ANNE SEKEL, in his professional and individual capacities;

· JIM CLARK, in his professional and individual capacities;

· STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR, FLORIDA;

· FLORIDA SUPREME COURT;

· HON. CHARLES T. WELLS, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. HARRY LEE ANSTEAD, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. R. FRED LEWIS, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. PEGGY A. QUINCE, in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. KENNETH B. BELL, in his official and individual capacities;

· THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual capacities;

· DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and individual capacities;

· DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA;

· CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA.;

· ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and individual capacities;

· ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual capacities;

· PAUL CURRAN in his official and individual capacities;

· MARTIN R. GOLD in his official and individual capacities;

· SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT;

· CATHERINE O’HAttorney GeneralEN WOLFE in her official and individual capacities;

· HON. ANGELA M. MAZZARELLI in her official and individual capacities;

· HON. RICHARD T. ANDRIAS in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. DAVID B. SAXE in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. DAVID FRIEDMAN in his official and individual capacities;

· HON. LUIZ A. GONZALES in his official and individual capacities;

· SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT;

· SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE;

· HON. A. GAIL PRUDENTI in her official and individual capacities;

· HON. JUDITH S. KAYE in her official and individual capacities;

· STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION;

· ANTHONY CARTUSCIELLO in his official and individual capacities;

· LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;

· OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK;

· ELIOT SPITZER in his official and individual capacities, as both former Attorney General for the State of New York, and, as former Governor of the State of New York;

· ANDREW CUOMO in his official and individual capacities, as both former Attorney General for the State of New York, and, as current Governor of the State of New York;

· Steven M. Cohen in his official and individual capacities, as both former Chief of Staff fo Attorney General Andrew Cuomo for the State of New York, and, as current Secretary to the Governor of the State of New York;

· Emily Cole, in her official and individual capacities, as an employee of Steven M. Cohen for the Governor Cuomo of the State of New York;

· COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA;

· VIRGINIA STATE BAR;

· ANDREW H. GOODMAN in his official and individual capacities;

· NOEL SENGEL in her official and individual capacities;

· MARY W. MARTELINO in her official and individual capacities;

· LIZBETH L. MILLER, in her official and individual capacities;

· MPEGLA LLC; LAWRENCE HORN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· INTEL CORP.; LARRY PALLEY, in his professional and individual capacities;

· SILICON GRAPHICS, INC.;

· LOCKHEED MARTIN Corp;

· EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE;

· ALAIN POMPIDOU in his official and individual capacities;

· WIM VAN DER EIJK in his official and individual capacities;

· LISE DYBDAHL in her official and personal capacities;

· DIGITAL INTERACTIVE STREAMS, INC.;

· ROYAL O’BRIEN, in his professional and individual capacities;

· HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED, WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional and individual capacities;

· WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional and individual capacities;

· BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities;

· SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities;

· ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities;

· JOHNNIE E. FRAZIER in his official and individual capacities;

· IVIEWIT, INC., a Florida corporation;

· IVIEWIT, INC., a Delaware corporation;

· IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Uview.com, Inc.);

· UVIEW.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation;

· IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Iviewit Holdings, Inc.);

· IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida corporation;

· IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Florida corporation;

· I.C., INC., a Florida corporation;

· IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation;

· IVIEWIT.COM LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;

· IVIEWIT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company;

· IVIEWIT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation;

· IBM CORPORATION;

To be added New Defendants in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit through amendment or in any anticipated future litigations and criminal filings:

· Andrew Cuomo, in his official and individual capacities,

· Steven M. Cohen, in his official and individual capacities,

· Emily Cole, in her official and individual capacities,

· Justice Richard C. Wesley in his official and individual capacities,

· Justice Peter W. Hall in his official and individual capacities,

· Justice Debra Ann Livingston in her official and individual capacities,

· Justice Ralph K. Winter in his official and individual capacities,

· P. Stephen Lamont, (Questions about Lamont’s filings on behalf of others and more filed with criminal authorities and this Court notified of the alleged fraudulent activities of Lamont)

· Alan Friedberg, in his official and individual capacities,

· Roy Reardon, in his official and individual capacities,

· Martin Glenn, in his official and individual capacities,

· Warner Bros. Entertainment, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Time Warner Communications, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· AOL Inc., (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Ropes & Gray,

· Stanford Financial Group,

· Bernard L. Madoff et al.

· Marc S. Dreier, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Sony Corporation, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Ernst & Young, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Arthur Andersen, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

· Enron, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

C. Other Cases @ US District Court - Southern District NY Related to Christine C. Anderson

· 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. - WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT;

· 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.;

· 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.;

· 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.;

· 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.;

· 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.;

· 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.;

· 08cv04053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.;

· 08cv04438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.

· 08cv06368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York

§20.00 Criminal liability for conduct of another;

§105.05 Conspiracy in the fifth degree, and

§105.10 Conspiracy in the fourth degree;

§115.00 Criminal facilitation in the fourth degree;

§195.00 Official misconduct,

§195.05 Obstructing governmental administration in the second degree,

§175.20 Tampering with public records in the second degree,

§175.25 Tampering with public records in the first degree. (class D felony).

NY Executive Law: § 63

General duties. The attorney-general shall: Prosecute and defend all actions and proceedings in which the state is interested…to protect the interest of the state…

and

Public Officers Rule 17 (2)(b)

New York State Consolidated Laws Penal

ARTICLE 200 BRIBERY INVOLVING PUBLIC SERVANTS AND RELATED OFFENSES

S 200.03 Bribery in the second degree

S 200.04 Bribery in the first degree

S 200.05 Bribery; defense

S 200.10 Bribe receiving in the third degree

S 200.11 Bribe receiving in the second degree

S 200.12 Bribe receiving in the first degree

S 200.15 Bribe receiving; no defense

S 200.20 Rewarding official misconduct in the second degree

S 200.22 Rewarding official misconduct in the first degree S 200.25 Receiving reward for official misconduct in the second degree

S 200.27 Receiving reward for official misconduct in the first degree

S 200.30 Giving unlawful gratuities

S 200.35 Receiving unlawful gratuities

S 200.40 Bribe giving and bribe receiving for public office; definition of term

S 200.45 Bribe giving for public office

S 200.50 Bribe receiving for public office

ARTICLE 175 OFFENSES INVOLVING FALSE WRITTEN STATEMENTS

S 175.20 Tampering with public records in the second degree

S 175.25 Tampering with public records in the first degree

S 175.30 Offering a false instrument for filing in the second degree

S 175.35 Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree

NY Constitution ARTICLE XIII Public Officers

Public Officers - Public Officers ARTICLE 1

ARTICLE 2 Appointment and Qualification of Public Officers - ARTICLE 15 ATTORNEYS AND COUNSELORS

S 476-b. Injunction to restrain defendant from unlawful practice of the law

S 476-c. Investigation by the attorney-general

S 487. Misconduct by attorneys

S 488. Buying demands on which to bring an action.

Public Officers Law SEC 73 Restrictions on the Activities Of Current and Former State Officers and Employees

Public Officers Law SEC 74 Code of Ethics

Conflicts of Interest Law, found in Chapter 68 of the New York City Charter, the City’s Financial Disclosure Law, set forth in section 12-110 of the New York City Administrative Code, and the Lobbyist Gift Law, found in sections 3-224 through 3-228 of the Administrative Code.

TITLE 18 FEDERAL CODE & OTHER APPLICABLE FEDERAL LAW OF THE RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT

Sec. 201. Bribery of public officials and witnesses

Sec. 225. - Continuing financial crimes enterprise

BRIBERY, GRAFT, AND CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

Sec. 205. - Activities of officers and employees in claims against and other matters affecting the Government

Sec. 208. - Acts affecting a personal financial interest

Sec. 210. - Offer to procure appointive public office

Sec. 225. - Continuing financial crimes enterprise

TITLE 18 PART I CH 79 Sec 1623 - False declarations before grand jury or court

Sec 654 - Officer or employee of United States converting property of another

TITLE 18 PART I CH 73 Sec 1511 - Obstruction of State or local law enforcement

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 Sec 1961 RACKETEER INFLUENCED AND CORRUPT Organizations (”RICO”)

Section 1503 (relating to obstruction of justice),

Section 1510 (relating to obstruction of criminal investigations)

Section 1511 (relating to the obstruction of State or local law enforcement),

Section 1952 (relating to racketeering),

Section 1957 (relating to engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity),

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 SEC 1962 (A) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 SEC 1962 (B) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 SEC 1962 (C) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 19 SEC 1962 (D) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 19 CONSPIRACY Sec 371 CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT OFFENSE OR TO DEFRAUD UNITED STATES

TITLE 18 PART I CH 95 RACKETEERING SEC 1957 Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity

TITLE 18 PART I CH 47 Sec 1031 - Major fraud against the United States

Judicial Cannons

Canon 1. A Judge Should Uphold the Integrity and Independence of the Judiciary

[1.1] Deference to the judgments and rulings of courts depends upon public confidence in the integrity and independence of judges. The integrity and independence of judges depends in turn upon their acting without fear or favor. Although judges should be independent, they must comply with the law, including the provisions of this Code. Public confidence in the impartiality of the judiciary is maintained by the adherence of each judge to this responsibility. Conversely, violation of this Code diminishes public confidence in the judiciary and thereby does injury to the system of government under law.

Canon 2. A Judge Should Avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in All Activities

(A) A judge shall respect and comply with the law and shall act at all times in a manner that promotes public confidence in the integrity and impartiality of the judiciary.

[2.2][2A] The prohibition against behaving with impropriety or the appearance of impropriety applies to both the professional and personal conduct of a judge. Because it is not practicable to list all prohibited acts, the proscription is necessarily cast in general terms that extend to conduct by judges that is harmful although not specifically mentioned in the Code. Actual improprieties under this standard include violations of law, court rules or other specific provisions of this Code. The test for appearance of impropriety is whether the conduct would create in reasonable minds a perception that the judge’s ability to carry out judicial responsibilities with integrity, impartiality and competence is impaired.

Canon 3. A Judge Should Perform the Duties of the Office Impartially and Diligently

(B) Adjudicative responsibilities.

(l) A judge shall be faithful to the law and maintain professional competence in it. A judge shall not be swayed by partisan interests, public clamor or fear of criticism.

(2) A judge shall require order and decorum in proceedings before the judge.

(D) Disciplinary responsibilities.

(1) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge has committed a substantial violation of this Part shall take appropriate action.

(2) A judge who receives information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has committed a substantial violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility shall take appropriate action.

(3) Acts of a judge in the discharge of disciplinary responsibilities are part of a judge’s judicial duties.

Public Office Conduct Codes New York

PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW Laws 1909, Chap. 51.

CHAPTER 47 OF THE CONSOLIDATED LAWS PUBLIC OFFICERS LAW

Sec. 17. Defense and indemnification of state officers and employees.

2 (b)

Sec. 18. Defense and indemnification of officers and employees of public entities.

3 (b)

Sec. 74. Code of ethics.

§ 73. Business or professional activities by state officers and employees and party officers.

NY Attorney Conduct Code

(a) “Differing interests” include every interest that will adversely affect either the judgment or the loyalty of a lawyer to a client, whether it be a conflicting, inconsistent, diverse, or other interest.

CANON 5. A Lawyer Should Exercise Independent Professional Judgment on Behalf of a Client

DR 5-101 [1200.20] Conflicts of Interest - Lawyer’s Own Interests.

DR 5-102 [1200.21] Lawyers as Witnesses.

DR 5-103 [1200.22] Avoiding Acquisition of Interest in Litigation.

DR 5-104 [1200.23] Transactions Between Lawyer and Client.

DR 5-105 [1200.24] Conflict of Interest; Simultaneous Representation.

DR 5-108 [1200.27] Conflict of Interest - Former Client.

CANON 6. A Lawyer Should Represent a Client Competently

CANON 7. A Lawyer Should Represent a Client Zealously Within the Bounds of the Law

DR 7-102 [1200.33] Representing a Client Within the Bounds of the Law.

DR 7-110 [1200.41] Contact with Officials.

DR 8-101 [1200.42] Action as a Public Official.

DR 8-103 [1200.44] Lawyer Candidate for Judicial Office.

A. A lawyer who is a candidate for judicial office shall comply with section 100.5 of the Chief Administrator’s Rules Governing Judicial Conduct (22 NYCRR) and Canon 5 of the Code of Judicial Conduct.

CANON 9. A Lawyer Should Avoid Even the Appearance of Professional Impropriety

DR 9-101 [1200.45] Avoiding Even the Appearance of Impropriety.

The underlying crimes which the New York Attorney General Office, Andrew Cuomo, Assistant Attorney General Monica Connell and Chief of Staff Steven M. Cohen conspired with and facilitated were the Iviewit Crimes described in Iviewit’s Trillion Dollar FEDERAL RICO & ANTITRUST LAWSUIT.

The allegations in the RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, include but are not limited to,

§ 125.25 Murder in the second degree.

§ 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.

§ 135.60 Coercion in the second degree

§ 155.42 Grand larceny in the first degree.

§ 170.15 Forgery in the first degree.

§ 170.30 Criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree.

§ 175.25 Tampering with public records in the first degree.

§ 175.35 Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree.

§ 195.05 Obstructing governmental administration in the second degree.

§ 210.15 Perjury in the first degree.

federal code

The Economic Espionage Act

ANTITRUST CIVIL PROCESS

THE SHERMAN& CLAYTON ACTS

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 Sec 1965 RICO VENUE AND PROCESS

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 Sec 1961 (”RICO”)

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 Sec 1962 (a) - RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 SEC 1962 (B) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 96 SEC 1962 (C) RICO

TITLE 18 PART I CH 19 CONSPIRACY Sec 371 CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT OFFENSE OR TO DEFRAUD UNITED STATES

TITLE 18 PART I CH 95 RACKETEERING Sec 1951 - INTERFERENCE WITH COMMERCE BY THREATS OR VIOLENCE

TITLE 18 PART I CH 95 RACKETEERING SEC 1952 Interstate and foreign travel or transportation in aid of racketeering enterprises

TITLE 18 PART I CH 95 RACKETEERING SEC 1956 Laundering of monetary instruments

TITLE 18 PART I CH 95 RACKETEERING SEC 1957 Engaging in monetary transactions in property derived from specified unlawful activity

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 103 SEC. 2112 - Personal property of United States

TITLE 15 CHAPTER 1 RELATING TO MONOPOLIES AND COMBINATIONS IN RESTRAINT OF TRADE Sec. 1 - Trusts, etc., in restraint of trade illegal; penalty

TITLE 15 CHAPTER 1 Sec. - Monopolizing trade a felony; penalty

TITLE 15 CHAPTER 1 Sec. 6 - Forfeiture of property in transit

TITLE 15 CHAPTER 1 Sec 6a - Conduct involving trade or commerce with foreign nations

TITLE 15 CHAPTER 1 Sec. 14 - Sale, etc., on agreement not to use goods of competitor

TITLE 15 CHAPTER 1 Sec. 18 - Acquisition by one corporation of stock of another

TITLE 15 CH 1 Sec 19 Interlocking directorates and officers

TITLE 15 CH 1 Sec 26 INJUNCTIVE RELIEF FOR PRIVATE PARTIES; EXCEPTION; COSTS

TITLE 15 CH 2 SUBCH I Sec 45 Unfair methods of competition unlawful; prevention by Commission

TITLE 15 CH 2 SUBCH I Sec 57b Civil actions for violations of rules and cease and desist orders respecting unfair or deceptive acts or practices

TITLE 15 CH 2 SUBCH II SEC 62 - Export trade and antitrust legislation

TITLE 15 CH 2 SUBCH II SEC 64 - Unfair methods of competition in export trade

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 501 Infringement of copyright.

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 502 Remedies for infringement: Injunctions

TITLE 17 CH 5 SEC 503 Remedies for infringement: Impounding and disposition of infringing articles

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 504 Remedies for infringement: Damages and profits

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 505 Remedies for infringement: Costs and attorney’s fees

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 506 Criminal offenses

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 507 Limitations on actions

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 508 Notification of filing and determination of actions

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 509 Seizure and forfeiture

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 510 REMEDIES FOR ALTERATION OF PROGRAMMING BY CABLE SYSTEMS

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 511 Liability of States, instrumentalities of States, and State officials for infringement of copyright

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 512 Limitations on liability relating to material online

TITLE 17 CH 5 Sec 513 Determination of reasonable license fees for individual proprietors

TITLE 17 CHAPTER 13 Sec 1312 - Oaths and acknowledgments

TITLE 17 CH 13 Sec 1326 Penalty for false marking

TITLE 17 CHAPTER 13 Sec 1327 - Penalty for false Representation

TITLE 17 cH 13 Sec 1329 Relation to design patent law

TITLE 17 CH 13 Sec 1330 Common law and other rights unaffected

TITLE 35 PART I CH 2 Sec 25 Declaration in lieu of oath

TITLE 35 PART II CH 11 Sec 115 Oath of applicant

TITLE 35 PART II CH 11 Sec 116 Inventors

TITLE 35 PART III CH 261 Ownership; assignment

TITLE 35 PART IV PATENT COOPERATION TREATY CH 35 Sec 351

TITLE 35 PART IV CH 37 Sec 373 Improper applicant

SEC1.56 Duty to disclose information material to patentability

SEC 1.63 regarding Oaths and declarations

CONSOLIDATED PATENT RULES SEC 1.63

SEC 1.64 regarding person making false oaths and Declarations

SEC 1.71 regarding detailed description and specification of the invention.

SEC 1.137 for Revival of abandoned application, terminated reexamination proceeding, or lapsed patent

LAWS NOT IN TITLE 35, UNITED STATES CODE 18 U.S.C. 1001

LAWS NOT IN TITLE 35, UNITED STATES CODE 18 U.S.C. 2071

Title 37 - Code of Federal Regulations Patents, Trademarks, and Copyrights - MANUAL OF PATENT EXAMINING PROCEDURE PATENT RULES Part 10 - PRACTICE BEFORE THE PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE PART 10 - REPRESENTATION OF OTHERS BEFORE THE UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK

SEC10.18 Signature and certificate for correspondence filed in the Patent and Trademark Office

SEC 10.20 Canons and Disciplinary Rules

SEC 10.21 Canon 1

SEC 10.23 Misconduct

SEC 10.25 - 10.29 [Reserved] SEC 10.30 Canon 2

SEC 10.31 Communications concerning a practitioner’s services

SEC 10.33 Direct contact with prospective clients

SEC 10.40 Withdrawal from employment

SEC 10.50 - 10.55 [Reserved] SEC 10.56 Canon 4

SEC 10.57 Preservation of confidences and secrets of a client

SEC 10.58 - 10.60 [Reserved] SEC 10.61 Canon 5

SEC 10.64 Avoiding acquisition of interest in litigation or proceeding before the Office

SEC 10.65 Limiting business relations with a client

SEC10.66 Refusing to accept or continue employment if the interests of another client may impair the independent professional judgment of the practitioner

SEC 10.68 Avoiding influence by others than the client

SEC 10.69 - 10.75 [Reserved] SEC 10.76 Canon 6

SEC 10.77 Failing to act competently

SEC 10.78 Limiting liability to client

SEC 10.79 - 10.82 [Reserved] SEC 10.83 Canon 7

SEC 10.84 Representing a client zealously

SEC 10.85 Representing a client within the bounds of the law

SEC 10.94 - 10.99 [Reserved] SEC 10.100 Canon 8

SEC 10.104 - 10.109 [Reserved] SEC 10.110 Canon 9

SEC 10.112 Preserving identity of funds and property of client

PATENT RULES PART 10 INDEX - PART 15

TITLE 18 PART I CH 90 Sec 1831 Economic espionage

TITLE 18 PART I CH 90 Sec 1832 Theft of trade secrets

TITLE 18 PART I CH 90 Sec 1834 Criminal forfeiture

TITLE 18 PART I CH 90 Sec 1835 ORDERS TO PRESERVE CONFIDENTIALITY

TITLE 18 PART I CH 90 Sec 1837 Applicability to conduct outside the United States

TITLE 15 CH 22 TRADEMARKS Sec 1116 Injunctive relief

TITLE 15 CH 22 SUBCH III Sec 1117 - Recovery for violation of rights

TITLE 15 CH 22 SUBCH III Sec 1120 CIVIL LIABILITY FOR FALSE OR FRAUDULENT REGISTRATION

TITLE 15 CH 22 SUBCH III Sec 1125 FALSE DESIGNATIONS OF ORIGIN, FALSE DESCRIPTIONS, AND DILUTION FORBIDDEN

TITLE 15 CH 22 SUBCH III Sec 1126 False designations of origin, false descriptions, and dilution forbidden

TITLE 17 - COPYRIGHTS

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 9 BANKRUPTCY Sec. 152 CONCEALMENT OF ASSETS; FALSE OATHS AND CLAIMS; BRIBERY

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 9 Sec 156 - Knowing disregard of bankruptcy law or rule

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 9 Sec 157 - Bankruptcy fraud

TITLE 11 CHAPTER 1 Sec 110 - Penalty for persons who negligently or fraudulently prepare bankruptcy petitions

TITLE 18 PART I CH 47 FRAUD AND FALSE STATEMENTS Sec 1001

TITLE 18 PART I CH 47 Sec 1031 - Major fraud against the United States

TITLE 18 PART I CH 65 Sec 1361 - Government property or contracts

TITLE 18 PART I CH 103 Sec 2112 - Personal property of United States

TITLE 18 PART I CH 103 Sec 2114 - Mail, money, or other property of United States

TITLE 18 PART I CH 113 STOLEN PROPERTY Sec 2311

TITLE 18 PART I CH 113 Sec 2314 - Transportation of stolen goods, securities, moneys, fraudulent State tax stamps, or articles used in counterfeiting

TITLE 18 PART I CH 113 Sec 2315 - Sale or receipt of stolen goods, securities, moneys, or fraudulent State tax stamps

TITLE 18 PART I CH 113 Sec 2318 - Trafficking in counterfeit labels for phonorecords, copies of computer programs or computer program documentation or packaging, and copies of motion pictures or other audio visual works, and trafficking in counterfeit computer program documentation or packaging

TITLE 18 PART I CH 113 Sec 2319 - Criminal infringement of a copyright

TITLE 18 PART I CH 113 Sec 2320 - Trafficking in counterfeit goods or services

TITLE 18 PART I CH 79 Sec 1621 - Perjury generally

TITLE 18 PART I CH 79 Sec 1622

TITLE 18 PART I CH 79 Sec 1623 - False declarations before grand jury or court

TITLE 18 PART I CH 63 Sec 1341 - Frauds and swindles

TITLE 18 PART I CH 63 Sec 1342 Fictitious name or address

TITLE 18 PART I CH 63 Sec 1343 - Fraud by wire, radio, or television

TITLE 18 PART I CH 63 Sec 1344 - Bank fraud

TITLE 18 PART I CH 63 Sec 1346 - Definition of ‘’scheme or artifice to defraud”

TITLE 18 PART I CH 63 Sec 1345 - Injunctions against fraud

TITLE 18 PART I CH 83 Sec 1701 - Obstruction of mails generally

TITLE 18 PART I CH 83 Sec 1702 - Obstruction of correspondence

TITLE 26 INTERNAL REVENUE CODE

TITLE 18 PART I CH 31 Sec 641 - Public money, property or records

Sec 654 -Officer or employee of United States converting property of another

TITLE 15 CH 22 SUBCH IV SUBCHAPTER IV - THE MADRID PROTOCOL

TITLE 18 PART I CH 73 Sec 1511 - Obstruction of State or local law enforcement

Respectfully Yours,

eliot-sig

_____________________
Eliot I. Bernstein
Founder & Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL
Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL
Uview.com, Inc. – DL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL
I.C., Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com LLC – DL
Iviewit LLC – DL
Iviewit Corporation – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Corporation
iviewit@iviewit.tv
2753 NW 34th St.
Boca Raton, FL 33434
(561) 245-8588 (o)
(561) 886-7627 (c)
http://www.iviewit.tv

cc/ec:

UNITED STATES OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT, The Honorable President of the United States Barack Obama @ Facsimile +1 (202) 456-2461

INSPECTOR GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Glenn Fine or his Replacementglenn.a.fine@usdoj.gov & oig.hotline@usdoj.gov

Cynthia A. Schnedar, Acting Inspector General ~ U. S. Department of Justice cynthia.a.schnedar@usdoj.gov &oig.hotline@usdoj.gov

HOUSE AND SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEES

The Honorable John Conyers Jr., Chairman ~ House Judiciary Committee john.conyers@mail.house.gov

The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein, Senate Judiciary Committee @ Facsimile (415) 393-0710 &senator@feinstein.senate.gov

NEW YORK SENATE JUDICIARY COMMITTEE @ members’ individual email addresses,

sampson@senate.state.ny.us onorato@senate.state.ny.us schneiderman@schneiderman.orgschneiderman@senate.state.ny.us hassellt@senate.state.ny.us diaz@senate.state.ny.us jdklein@senate.state.ny.useadams@senate.state.ny.us espada@senate.state.ny.us breslin@senate.state.ny.us dilan@senate.state.ny.ussavino@senate.state.ny.us perkins@senate.state.ny.us maziarz@senate.state.ny.us jdefranc@senate.state.ny.usvolker@senate.state.ny.us saland@senate.state.ny.us lavalle@senate.state.ny.us bonacic@senate.state.ny.uswinner@senate.state.ny.us nozzolio@senate.state.ny.us lanza@senate.state.ny.us ranz@senate.state.ny.usspotts@senate.state.ny.us

UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, Eric Holder, Jr.,

inspector.general@usdoj.gov & AskDOJ@usdoj.gov

SEC, Chairperson Mary Shapiro CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov and enforcement@sec.gov

SEC INSPECTOR GENERAL, H. David Kotz oig@sec.gov

Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration, David Gouvaia Complaints@tigta.treas.gov anddavid.gouvaia@tigta.treas.gov

SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION INSPECTOR GENERAL, Peggy E. Gustafson & Daniel J. O’Rourke daniel.o’rourke@sba.gov & http://web.sba.gov/oigcss/client/dsp_welcome.cfm Complaint Form

US DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE INSPECTOR GENERAL, Todd J. Zinser hotline@oig.doc.gov @ tzinser@oig.doc.gov

Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the US Patent Office, David Kapposdavid.kappos@USPTO.gov

Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the USPTO, Sharon BarnerSharon.Barner@USPTO.gov

US PATENT OFFICE - OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT AND DISCIPLINE DIRECTOR, Harry I. MoatzHarry.Moatz@USPTO.GOV

The Hon. Preet Bharara, United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York ~ United States Department of Justice Preet.Bharara@usdoj.gov

Hon. William M. Welch II, Chief, Public Integrity Unit ~ United States Department of Justice AskDOJ@usdoj.gov

The Hon. John L. Sampson, Chairman ~ New York State Senate Judiciary Committee sampson@senate.state.ny.us

The Hon. Boyd M. Johnson III, Deputy United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, Public Corruption Unit ~ United States Department of Justice

The Hon. Loretta A. Preska, Chief U.S. District Judge ~ United States Courthouse Southern District of New YorkLoretta.A.Preska@NYSD.uscourts.gov

Andrew M. Cuomo, Governor ~ New York State http://www.governor.ny.gov/contact/GovernorContactForm.php

and Governor.Cuomo@exec.ny.gov and Andrew.cuomo@exec.ny.gov

Steven Michael Cohen, Secretary, Andrew M. Cuomo ~ New York State

steven.cohen@exec.ny.gov and lisa.cantwell@exec.ny.gov c/o Steven Cohen and Andrew Cuomo

The Hon. Luis A. Gonzalez, Presiding Justice ~ New York State Supreme Court Appellate Division

The Hon. Joseph M. Demarest, Jr., Assistant Director, International Operations Division, Federal Bureau of Investigation ny1@ic.fbi.gov

The Honorable Elena Kagan, Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States ekagan@law.harvard.edu

The Honorable Neal Katyal, Acting Solicitor General of the United States, Solicitor General, US Department of JusticeAskDOJ@usdoj.gov and katyaln@law.georgetown.edu

Robert S. Mueller, III., Director ~ Federal Bureau of Investigation ~ FBI Headquarters 935 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, D.C. 20535-0001 (202) 324-3000

Candice M. Will, Assistant Director, Office of Professional Responsibility ~ Federal Bureau of Investigation, Facsimile (202) 514-5050

The Honorable Shira A. Scheindlin, United States District Court ~ Southern District of New Yorkshira_a._scheindlin@NYSD.uscourts.gov

Peter L. McClintock, Deputy Inspector General ~ Small Business Administration peter.mcclintock@SBA.gov andoig@sba.gov

Daniel J. O’Rourke, Investigations Division ~ Small Business Administration daniel.o’rourke@sba.gov

Chris P. Mercer, President ~ Institute of Professional Representatives before the European Patent Office (epi)cpm@carpmaels.com and info@patentepi.com

New York Office of the Attorney General, Joseph M. Demarest, Jr. ~ FBI Assistant Director in Charge of the New York Division, 26 Federal Plaza, 23rd Floor New York, NY 10278-0004

Lovett & Bellatoni, LLP ~ Attorneys at Law

Select Press & Media

Select Iviewit Shareholders and Patent Interest Holders

Lawsuit Plaintiffs in “Legally Related” Anderson Case

Enclosure(s)/Attachment(s)/URL’s

All Uniform Resource Locators ( URL’s ) and the contents of those URL’s are incorporated in entirety by reference herein and therefore must be included in your hard copy file WITH ALL EXHIBITS, as part of this correspondence and as further evidentiary material to be Investigated. Due to allegations alleged by New York State Supreme Court Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson and similar claims in the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, regarding Document Destruction and Tampering with Official Complaints and Records, please PRINT all referenced URL’s and their corresponding exhibits, attaching them to your printed copy, as this is now necessary to ensure fair and impartial review.

In order to confirm that NO DOCUMENT DESTRUCTION OR ALTERCATION has occurred to this Document or Exhibits, once you have printed the document, all exhibits and URL’s forward a copy of the printed document with all exhibits and materials included, to Eliot I. Bernstein at the address listed herein. This will insure that all parties are reviewing the same documentation and additional illegal activity has not taken place. If you, for any reason, are incapable of printing and/or sending this confirmation copy, please put your reasons for failure to comply in writing and send that to Eliot I. Bernstein at the address listed herein within 10 days of receipt of this communication. Note, that this is a request only for a copy of this Correspondence and the referenced materials and NOT a request for any Case Investigation information, which may be protected by law.

cmb/eib 33776w/192616ns/226117ws/

NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL OFFICE OF ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN ADMISSION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BY JAMES ROGERS, ESQ. IN HANDLING IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES & ELIOT BERNSTEIN’S CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST ANDREW CUOMO AND STEVEN M. COHEN. DEMAND FOR IMMEDIATE INVESTIGATION OF ANDREW CUOMO AND ELIOT SPITZER FOR VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICE RULES & FELONY RICO CRIMES. CALL FOR NY ATTORNEY GENERAL TO CEASE ILLEGAL REPRESENTATIONS OF STATE SENIOR PUBLIC OFFICIALS, INCLUDING FORMER CHIEF JUDGE OF NEW YORK JUDITH KAYE IN THE IVIEWIT 12 TRILLION DOLLAR FEDERAL RICO AND ANTITRUST LAWSUIT, “LEGALLY RELATED” BY FEDERAL JUDGE SHIRA SCHEINDLIN TO A WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT OF CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON A NEW YORK SUPREME COURT ATTORNEY.

Sunday, May 22nd, 2011
I eyeball31VIEWeyeball31IT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Surf with Vision

Copies of the SIGNED and FILED LETTER to NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL @

Andrew Cuomo and Steven Michael Cohen Criminal Complaints and New York Attorney General Admission of Conflict Letter

COPIES of the CALLS @ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2pwFlEIp6E

——————————————–

Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form

Please accept and return signed the following Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form (COI) before continuing further with adjudication, review or investigation of the attached letter to, the New York Attorney General’s Office, titled,

ADMISSION & ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST by the NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL in handling CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST ANDREW CUOMO and STEVEN M. COHEN et al. / Phone Call on April 14, 2011 with James Rogers on behalf of Harlan Levy referred by Steven Michael Cohen, Chief of Staff to Governor Andrew Cuomo, regarding FILED Criminal Complaints against the New York Attorney General’s Office, Former Attorney General Andrew Cuomo, Steven Michael Cohen, Secretary to Governor Andrew Cuomo and Monica Connell of the New York State Office of the Attorney General et al.

and any/all materials relating to Eliot Bernstein and or the Iviewit companies.

After 10 Days, if this form has not been signed