Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein posts draft Motion to Kiss My Ass  to be filed at the United States Second Circuit Court. Court Officials fingered by New York Supreme Court Whistleblower Christine C. Anderson, read all about it!!! Extra! Extra! Cuomo Alleged representing Public Officials OBSTRUCTING Investigations!!!

http://www.google.com/url?sa=i&source=images&cd=&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CAgQjRw&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.fotolog.com%2Freddragon1990%2F44559526%2F&ei=YIvaVLe3PKXksATH0ILICw&psig=AFQjCNG-tJHvrm1tiDiHutEDg1w5kg6Xrg&ust=1423695073051821

OK, since so many want the ROUGH Draft Release here is the Second Circuit Filing coming soon with additional criminal complaints against Court Officers and Coumo and more….this is still rough rough

EMERGENCY MOTION TO KISS MY ASS; CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST JUSTICES AND OFFICERS OF THIS COURT AND NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL ANDREW CUOMO’S OFFICE; HALT PROCEEDING PENDING CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND RESPONSE FROM CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES AND COURT OVERSIGHT; REMOVE THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN THIS COURT THROUGH CESSATION OF VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL CANNONS, ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES, PUBLIC OFFICE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAW; RESTORE ORDER TO THIS COURT!

Table of Contents

INTRODUCTION – THE JIGGY IS UP ON THE CORRUPTION BY COURT OFFICIALS, FRAUD ON COURT BY COURT OFFICIALS EXPOSED BY WHISTLEBLOWER IN LEGALLY “RELATED” LAWSUIT7

RESPONSE TO ILLEGALLY TENDERED ORDER OF DISMISSAL – CITIZEN’S ARREST OF MEMBERS OF THIS COURT FOR FELONY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE AND MORE11

DENIAL OF DUE PROCESS THROUGH DENIAL OF RIGHT TO COUNSEL THROUGH EXTORTION OF LAWYERS AND COURT PERSONNEL TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE, EVIDENCED IN LEGALLY RELATED WHISTLEBLOWER ANDERSON LAWSUIT14

WHAT IS AND WHAT IS NOT MERITORIOUS IN THE LAWSUIT BEFORE THIS COURT21

WHAT IS NOT FRIVOLOUS21

WHAT IS FRIVOLOUS26

EXHIBIT 1 – CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS28

JUSTICES RICHARD C. WESLEY, PETER W. HALL AND DEBRA ANN LIVINGSTON OF THE NEW YORK SECOND CIRCUIT COURT AND CATHERINE O’HAGAN WOLFE – CLERK OF THE COURT29

• MARCH 02, 2010 EXPOSE CORRUPT COURTS ~ COMMITTEE ON PUBLIC INTEGRITY CALLS ON FEDS FOR FEDERAL MONITOR OVER NY STATE COURT SYSTEM – “INJUSTICE ANYWHERE IS A THREAT TO JUSTICE EVERYWHERE.” (DR. MARTIN LUTHER KING, JR.)29

JUSTICE SHIRA A. SCHEINDLIN OF THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT – SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK30

THE NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL ~ ELIOT SPITZER AND ANDREW CUOMO31

NEW YORK SUPREME COURT APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT – DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE ~ ROY REARDON, ALAN FRIEDBERG32

P. STEPHEN LAMONT33

WHISTLEBLOWER CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON RELATED CRIMES34

NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL – ILLEGAL REPRESENTATION / OBSTRUCTION34

FIRST DEPARTMENT OBSTRUCTIONS AND OTHER CRIMES34

US ATTORNEY – NEW YORK34

NEW YORK DISTRICT ATTORNEY34

NEW YORK ASSISTANT DISTRICT ATTORNEY34

FEDERAL BANKRUPTCY JUDGE MARTIN GLENN34

PROSKAUER ROSE, FOLEY & LARDNER, VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, MELTZER LIPPE GOLDSTEIN & SCHLISSEL, RAYMOND JOAO & GREENBERG TRAURIG34

FEDERAL LAWS VIOLATED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO,35

Conspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241.35

Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242.36

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 §1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees37

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1503. Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally37

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 73 > § 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees.38

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1506 Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail39

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1509 Obstruction of court orders39

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant.39

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1514 Civil action to restrain harassment of a victim or witness42

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1515 Definitions for certain provisions; general provision44

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1519 Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy46

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 9 § 152 Concealment of assets; false oaths and claims; bribery.46

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 9 § 154 Adverse interest and conduct of officers.47

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 9 § 157 Bankruptcy fraud.48

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 9 § 158 Designation of United States attorneys and agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to address abusive reaffirmations of debt and materially fraudulent statements in bankruptcy schedules.48

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 11 § 201 Bribery of public officials and witnesses.49

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 11 § 225 Continuing financial crimes enterprise.52

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 19 § 371 Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States.52

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 21 § 402 Contempts constituting crimes.52

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 31 § 641 Public money, property or records.53

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 95 § 1959 Violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity.54

STATE LAW VIOLATIONS NEW YORK, VIRGINIA, FLORIDA AND DELAWARE55

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE84

08-4873-CV

United States Court of Appeal for the Second Circuit

Eliot Ivan Bernstein

Plaintiff – Appellant

–v–

DEFENDANTS: STATE OF NEW YORK, THE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, STEVEN C. KRANE in his official and individual Capacities for the New York State Bar Association and the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, and, his professional and individual capacities as a Proskauer partner, KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities, ESTATE OF STEPHEN KAYE, in his professional and individual capacities, ALAN S. JAFFE, in his professional and individual capacities, ROBERT J. KAFIN, in his professional and individual capacities, CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, in his professional and individual capacities, MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer, ALBERT T. GORTZ, in his professional and individual capacities, CHRISTOPHER PRUZASKI, in his professional and individual capacities, MARA LERNER ROBBINS, in her professional and individual capacities,DONALD “ROCKY” THOMPSON, in his professional and individual capacities, GAYLE COLEMAN, in her professional and individual capacities, DAVID GEORGE, in his professional and individual capacities, GEORGE A. PINCUS, in his professional and individual capacities, GREGG REED, in his professional and individual capacities, LEON GOLD, in his professional and individual capacities, MARCY HAHN-SAPERSTEIN, in her professional and individual capacities, KEVIN J. HEALY, in his professional and individual capacities, STUART KAPP, in his professional and individual capacities, RONALD F. STORETTE, in his professional and individual capacities, CHRIS WOLF, in his professional and individual capacities, JILL ZAMMAS, in her professional and individual capacities, JON A. BAUMGARTEN, in his professional and individual capacities, SCOTT P. COOPER, in his professional and individual capacities, BRENDAN J. O’ROURKE, in his professional and individual capacities, LAWRENCE I. WEINSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities, WILLIAM M. HART, in his professional and individual capacities, DARYN A. GROSSMAN, in his professional and individual capacities, JOSEPH A. CAPRARO JR., in his professional and individual capacities, JAMES H. SHALEK, in his professional and individual capacities, GREGORY MASHBERG, in his professional and individual capacities, JOANNA SMITH, in her professional and individual capacities, MELTZER LIPPE GOLDSTEIN WOLF & SCHLISSEL, P.C. and its predecessors and successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, LEWIS S. MELTZER, in his professional and individual capacities, RAYMOND A. JOAO, in his professional and individual capacities, FRANK MARTINEZ, in his professional and individual capacities, FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, MICHAEL C. GREBE, in his professional and individual capacities, WILLIAM J. DICK, in his professional and individual capacities, TODD C. NORBITZ, in his professional and individual capacities, ANNE SEKEL, in his professional and individual capacities, RALF BOER, in his professional and individual capacities, BARRY GROSSMAN, in his professional and individual capacities, JIM CLARK, in his professional and individual capacities, DOUGLAS A. BOEHM, in his professional and individual capacities, STEVEN C. BECKER, in his professional and individual capacities, BRIAN G. UTLEY, MICHAEL REALE, RAYMOND HERSCH, WILLIAM KASSER, ROSS MILLER, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities, STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR, FLORIDA, HON. JORGE LABARGA in his official and individual capacities, THE FLORIDA BAR, JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS in his official and individual capacities, KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON in her official and individual capacities, LORRAINE CHRISTINE HOFFMAN in her official and individual capacities, ERIC TURNER in his official and individual capacities, KENNETH MARVIN in his official and individual capacities, JOY A. BARTMON in her official and individual capacities, JERALD BEER in his official and individual capacities, BROAD & CASSEL, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, JAMES J. WHEELER, in his professional and individual capacities, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, HON. CHARLES T. WELLS, in his official and individual capacities, HON. HARRY LEE ANSTEAD, in his official and individual capacities HON. R. FRED LEWIS, in his official and individual capacities, HON. PEGGY A. QUINCE, in his official and individual capacities, HON. KENNETH B. BELL, in his official and individual capacities, THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual capacities, DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and individual capacities, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA, CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA., ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and individual capacities, ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual capacities, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, THOMAS J. CAHILL in his official and individual capacities, PAUL CURRAN in his official and individual capacities, MARTIN R. GOLD in his official and individual capacities, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT, CATHERINE O’HAGEN WOLFE in her official and individual capacities, HON. ANGELA M. MAZZARELLI in her official and individual capacities, HON. RICHARD T. ANDRIAS in his official and individual capacities, HON. DAVID B. SAXE in his official and individual capacities, HON. DAVID FRIEDMAN in his official and individual capacities, HON. LUIZ A. GONZALES in his official and individual capacities, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, LAWRENCE DIGIOVANNA in his official and individual capacities, DIANA MAXFIELD KEARSE in her official and individual capacities, JAMES E. PELTZER in his official and individual capacities, HON. A. GAIL PRUDENTI in her official and individual capacities, HON. JUDITH S. KAYE in her official and individual capacities, STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION, ANTHONY CARTUSCIELLO in his official and individual capacities, LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ELIOT SPITZER in his official and individual capacities, as both former Attorney General for the State of New York, and, as former Governor of the State of New York, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, VIRGINIA STATE BAR, ANDREW H. GOODMAN in his official and individual capacities, NOEL SENGEL in her official and individual capacities, MARY W. MARTELINO in her official and individual capacities, LIZBETH L. MILLER, in her official and individual capacities, MPEGLA, LLC, LAWRENCE HORN, in his professional and individual capacities, REAL 3D, INC. and successor companies, GERALD STANLEY, in his professional and individual capacities, DAVID BOLTON, in his professional and individual capacities, TIM CONNOLLY, in his professional and individual capacities, ROSALIE BIBONA, in her professional and individual capacities, RYJO, INC., RYAN HUISMAN, in his professional and individual capacities, INTEL CORP., LARRY PALLEY, in his professional and individual capacities, SILICON GRAPHICS, INC., LOCKHEED MARTIN, BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN, LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, NORMAN ZAFMAN, in his professional and individual capacities, THOMAS COESTER, in his professional and individual capacities, FARZAD AHMINI, in his professional and individual capacities, GEORGE HOOVER, in his professional and individual capacities, WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, MARTYN W. MOLYNEAUX, in his professional and individual capacities, MICHAEL DOCKTERMAN, in his professional and individual capacities, HARRISON GOODARD FOOTE, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE, ALAIN POMPIDOU in his official and individual capacities, WIM VAN DER EIJK in his official and individual capacities, LISE DYBDAHL in her official and personal capacities, YAMAKAWA INTERNATIONAL PATENT OFFICE, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, MASAKI YAMAKAWA, in his professional and individual capacities, CROSSBOW VENTURES, INC., ALPINE VENTURE CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, STEPHEN J. WARNER, in his professional and individual capacities, RENE P. EICHENBERGER, in his professional and individual capacities, H. HICKMAN “HANK” POWELL, in his professional and individual capacities, MAURICE BUCHSBAUM, in his professional and individual capacities, ERIC CHEN, in his professional and individual capacities, AVI HERSH, in his professional and individual capacities, MATTHEW SHAW, in his professional and individual capacities, BRUCE W. SHEWMAKER, in his professional and individual capacities, RAVI M. UGALE, in his professional and individual capacities, DIGITAL INTERACTIVE STREAMS, INC., ROYAL O’BRIEN, in his professional and individual capacities, HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED, WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional and individual capacities, WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional and individual capacities, TIEDEMANN INVESTMENT GROUP, BRUCE T. PROLOW, in his professional and individual capacities, CARL TIEDEMANN, in his professional and individual capacities, ANDREW PHILIP CHESLER, in his professional and individual capacities, CRAIG L. SMITH, in his professional and individual capacities, HOUSTON & SHAHADY, P.A., and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities, FURR & COHEN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities, MOSKOWITZ, MANDELL, SALIM & SIMOWITZ, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities, SACHS SAX & KLEIN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities, SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities, SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP, and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, RICHARD SCHIFFRIN, in his professional and individual capacities, ANDREW BARROWAY, in his professional and individual capacities, KRISHNA NARINE, in his professional and individual capacities, CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, ALAN M. WEISBERG, in his professional and individual capacities, ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities, JOHNNIE E. FRAZIER in his official and individual capacities, IVIEWIT, INC., a Florida corporation, IVIEWIT, INC., a Delaware corporation, IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Uview.com, Inc.), UVIEW.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Iviewit Holdings, Inc.), IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida corporation, IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Florida corporation, I.C., INC., a Florida corporation, IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, IVIEWIT.COM LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, IVIEWIT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, IVIEWIT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, IBM CORPORATION.

NEW DEFENDANTS IN THE RICO AND ANTITRUST LAWSUIT TO BE ADDED THROUGH AMENDMENT OR IN ANY ANTICIPATED FUTURE LITIGATIONS AND CRIMINAL FILINGS:

Andrew Cuomo in his official and individual capacities, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed and approved),

Justice Richard C. Wesley in his official and individual capacities,

Justice Peter W. Hall in his official and individual capacities,

Justice Debra Ann Livingston in her official and individual capacities,

Justice Ralph K. Winter in his official and individual capacities,

P. Stephen Lamont, (Questions about Lamont’s filings on behalf of others and more filed with criminal authorities and this Court notified of the alleged fraudulent activities of Lamont)

Justice Shira A. Scheindlin in her official and individual capacities,

Alan Friedberg in his official and individual capacities,

Roy Reardon in his official and individual capacities,

Martin Glenn in his official and individual capacities,

Warner Bros. Entertainment, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed and approved),

Time Warner Communications, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed and approved),

AOL Inc., (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed and approved),

Ropes & Gray,

Stanford Financial Group,

Bernard L. Madoff et al.

Marc S. Dreier, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed and approved),

Sony Corporation, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed and approved),

Ernst & Young, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed and approved),

Arthur Andersen, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed and approved),

Enron,

More Defendants or possible Witnesses

Christine C. Anderson, Esq.,

Nicole Corrado, Esq.,

Frank Brady aka Kevin McKeown

Related Cases

Defendants – Appellees

ON APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

07CIV11196 (SAS) BERNSTEIN, ET AL. V APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, ET AL.

LEGALLY “RELATED” NEW YORK SUPREME COURT WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT

07CIV9599 (SAS-AJP) CHRISTINE C. ANDERSON V. THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

LEGALLY “RELATED” LAWSUITS TO ANDERSON

07CIV11196 (SAS) BERNSTEIN, ET AL. V APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, ET AL.

07CV11612 ESPOSITO V THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

08CV00526 CAPOGROSSO V NEW YORK STATE COMMISSION ON JUDICIAL CONDUCT, ET AL.

08CV02391MCKEOWN V THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

08CV02852 GALISON V THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

08CV03305 CARVEL V THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

08CV4053 GIZELLA WEISSHAUS V THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

08CV4438 SUZANNE MCCORMICK V THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

08CV6368 JOHN L. PETREC-TOLINO V. THE STATE OF NEW YORK

06CV05169 MCNAMARA V THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ET AL.

———-

EMERGENCY MOTION TO KISS MY ASS; CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AGAINST JUSTICES AND OFFICERS OF THIS COURT AND NEW YORK ATTORNEY GENERAL ANDREW CUOMO’S OFFICE; HALT PROCEEDING PENDING CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND RESPONSE FROM CRIMINAL AUTHORITIES AND COURT OVERSIGHT; REMOVE THE APPEARANCE OF IMPROPRIETY IN THIS COURT THROUGH CESSATION OF VIOLATIONS OF JUDICIAL CANNONS, ATTORNEY CONDUCT CODES, PUBLIC OFFICE RULES AND REGULATIONS AND LAW; RESTORE ORDER TO THIS COURT!

——

THE JIGGY IS UP ON THE CORRUPTION BY COURT AND PUBLIC OFFICIALS. FRAUD ON COURT BY COURT OFFICIALS EXPOSED BY WHISTLEBLOWER IN LEGALLY “RELATED” LAWSUIT

January 05, 2010 US Second Circuit (Circus) order

Appellant Bernstein, pro se, moves to compel the appointment of counsel and for extensive relief. Upon due consideration, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion is DENIED to the extent it seeks to compel the appointment of counsel and the appeal is DISMISSED because it lacks an arguable basis in law or fact. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e); see also Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); see also Pillay v. INS, 45 F.3d 14, 17 (2d Cir. 1995) (this Court has “inherent authority, wholly aside from any statutory warrant, to dismiss an appeal or petition for review as frivolous when the appeal or petition presents no arguably meritorious issue for our consideration.”). It is further ORDERED that the remainder of Appellant Bernstein’s motion to compel, and all motions that remain pending before this Court, are DENIED as moot.

In response to this Court’s ILLEGALLY TENDERED DISMISSAL of Plaintiff’s Appeal on January 05, 2010, herein referred to as “Illegally Tendered Order of Dismissal” , Plaintiff wants to first thank the Court for providing further evidence of certain Members of this Court’s CONTINUED CRIMINAL MISCONDUCT. The Illegally Tendered Order of Dismissal provides additional Prima Fascia Evidence for the CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS and REQUEST FOR OVERSIGHT OF THIS COURT already filed with authorities against Members of this Court as explained in Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel . The Motion to Compel circulated to both Federal and State Criminal Investigators and this Court’s Overseers already and wherefore Plaintiff patiently awaits responses from each as exhibited in the attached Exhibit 1. Members of this Court have already allegedly committed and have been reported for felony crimes and yet they continue conducting massive FRAUD ON THE COURT. Whereby criminal charges are alleged against each Court Official who has put their fingerprints on this lawsuit by issuing any orders or any other actions constituting involvement in the lawsuit, without first resolving ALL, and there are many, Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Judicial Canons, Violations of Attorney Codes of Conduct and Violations of State, Federal and International Laws. All actions and orders of this Court issued prior to resolution of the Conflicts of Interest causing Obstruction of Justice are merely further evidence of the criminal RICO enterprise’s continued illegal activities alleged in Plaintiff’s Federal RICO and Anti-Trust lawsuit.

The alleged illegal legal misconduct acts together, in typical legal conspiratorial fashion as defined below in 18 U.S.C §241 and alleged in Plaintiff’s RICO STATEMENT, to illegally block Plaintiff’s legal Due Process and Procedural Rights, further obstructing Constitutional Rights to Plaintiff’s Inventions as guaranteed in Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 of the United States Constitution and federal law. The criminal acts of this Court with scienter to cover-up the crimes in the courts, Obstruct Justice as defined under Title 18 USC and NY State Law, acting to aid and abet the cover-up of multiple violations of Federal, State and International codes of law by the alleged RICO Criminal Enterprise commissioned in the theft of Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties. Again, the alleged RICO Enterprise defined in the RICO STATEMENT is composed mainly of dirty rotten lawyers, law firms, prosecutors, public officials and judges, which is not hard to believe when one knows the original conspirators were leading US law firms with the ability to infiltrate those positions necessary within the courts and prosecutorial offices to block due process.

Then there is Christine C. Anderson (“Anderson”), who filed the legally “related” WHISTLEBLOWER lawsuit. Anderson fingering in open US Federal Court and before the NY Senate Judiciary Committee, high-ranking court officials, NY State and Federal prosecutorial officials, including but not limited to, the New York Attorney General , the US Attorney, the DA and the ADA. Anderson in a catchall statement claims the WHITEWASHING and FEDERAL AND STATE OBSTRUCTION was also for unnamed “favored lawyers and law firms”. Until discovery and investigation into just who the “favored” lawyers and law firms are, Plaintiff has absolute rights to DEMAND conflict disclosure from any/all lawyers involved in this lawsuit. Plaintiff DEMANDS disclosure from all lawyers participating in this lawsuit, including but not limited to, those acting on behalf of the US Attorney, DA, ADA, New York Attorney General, judges (including those at this Court) and all lawyers in any disciplinary regulatory roles acting under the auspice of the New York Supreme Courts.

In fact, Anderson names a “Cleaner” employed by the First Department, Naomi Goldstein, who allegedly “Cleans” dirty rotten unethical attorney complaints, including for dirty rotten unethical attorney public officials including US Attorneys, DA’s and ADA’s. Exactly who those “favored law firms and lawyers” and which US Attorneys, DA’s and ADA’s Anderson refers to, all remain a mystery due to a failure by public officials to investigate public officials, in many instances themselves, instead representing defendants ILLEGALLY both personally and professionally and CONFLICTING with their public office duties to investigate the accused public officials. These Conflicts of Interest by prosecutorial offices cause Obstruction of Justice and other violations of law described further herein. Finally, the Attorney General’s offices is a defendant in the Amended Complaint and is in need of counsel for their offices in this lawsuit and thus are further conflicted in representing other defendants in this Court, again conflicts being the glue that bind this conspiracy together to block due process.

In fact, in an Order dated March 07, 2008, Scheindlin states,

By letter to the Court dated March 5, 2008, plaintiffs request that the Court investigate whether the Attorney General for the State of New York suffers from conflicts of interest that prevent him from representing certain defendants (the “State Defendants”) in this matter. Plaintiffs suggest that the Attorney General is conflicted because they requested that he investigate the allegations underlying this action and because they believe he will be called upon to investigate related allegations as they are exposed. I have considered plaintiffs’ request and have determined that the Attorney General does not face an improper conflict of interest in representing the State Defendants. If, however, the Attorney General concludes that an investigation of defendants is warranted, then independent counsel would be required.

What better reason to investigate the State Defendants then the fact that Anderson has fingered many of the named Defendants in this lawsuit with insider revelations of Obstruction, including but not limited to, Document Destruction, Tampering with Official State and Federal Records, Extortion by Senior Court Officials of Federal Witnesses and more. With Anderson’s revelations in US Federal Court of the Court and Public Office Corruptions “Your “Jiggy is Up”, Your robes down, Your cover blown and all by an insider; all with tentacles to Members of this Court, all whom must now be wholly disqualified from further ILLEGAL involvement in this lawsuit and arrested for felony crimes already committed.

Whereby Plaintiff/Appellee properly has requested a halting of these proceedings in the Motion to Compel in order to investigate the criminal allegations of both Federal and State Obstruction of Justice Laws and more levied by Anderson and now necessary to find out whom exactly the public officials and “favored lawyers and law firms” are, before proceeding. Your attempts to hurry and dismiss the entire case, prior to resolution by state, federal and international criminal authorities, in efforts to feather your cap with Orders vindicating yourselves and others is laughable to say the least, criminal in fact. Especially in light of the fact that there are ongoing investigations that have led to Suspensions of Plaintiffs Intellectual Properties and there remain ongoing state, federal and international investigations and yet, only in New York are their coordinated efforts to dismiss the matters prior to formal investigations being completed through a plethora of conflicts of interest.

Plaintiff DEMANDS a Federal Monitor! A Federal Monitor has also been called for in the Anderson lawsuit and other legally “related” lawsuits for similar Conflicts of Interest that Obstruct Justice. Conflicts committed again and again by the New York Attorney General, State and Federal Prosecutorial Offices, lawyers and law firms representing the Defendants and the Judges whom allow the illegal Conflicts of Interest to continue to Obstruct Justice with scienter in their courtrooms. Therefore, due to the incestuous conflicts between the New York State and Federal Courts with the New York State and Federal Prosecutorial Offices as testified to by Whistleblower Anderson, this lawsuit must now be moved outside the tangled web of illegal conflicts in New York. Due to the number of Defendants that are high-ranking State and Federal Public Officials in New York alleged herein to have participated in the cover-up crimes whereby it is now further impossible to gain fair and impartial due process in the both the New York courts and investigatory agencies. Further, until discovery in the Anderson case is completed in order to determine just whom exactly these New York Public Officials are that act to criminally Obstruct Justice, fair and impartial due process cannot be had. Therefore, all Orders of the Court(s), all actions by State and Federal investigatory agencies and all representations by ILLEGALLY CONFLICTED COUNSEL, ILLEGALLY CONFLICTED PUBLIC OFFICIALS and COURT OFFICIALS, will eventually be stricken, only to be used as further Prima Fascia evidence of the Criminal Cover-Up inside the Court(s) and state and federal prosecutorial offices.

RETORT TO ILLEGALLY TENDERED ORDER OF DISMISSAL – ADDITIONAL citizen’s arrest of NEW members of this court and the new york attorney general andrew cuomo’s ofFICE for felony obstruction OF justice and more

Allow me to retort to your Illegally Tendered Order of Dismissal and respond in kind with the fact that this MOTION TO KISS MY ASS will now be attached to your ILLEGALLY TENDERED DISMISSAL and submitted to those same criminal investigators and overseers already petitioned regarding criminal activities of Members of this Court. Your Illegally Tendered Order of Dismissal will serve as further Prima Facie evidence of continued corruption and serve as new evidence for additional complaints against those Court Officials who signed the Illegally Tendered Order of Dismissal, additional to those criminally charged that signed Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel and other Orders in these matters.

Again, let Plaintiff remind the Court that Plaintiff has already made a Formal Citizen’s Arrest, as defined by Black’s Law Dictionary as, “The apprehending or detaining of a person in order to be forthcoming to answer an alleged or suspected crime” Ex parte Sherwood, (29 Tex. App. 334, 15 S.W. 812)” and further defined within New York State Consolidated Law which holds that “Any person may arrest another person (a) for a felony when the latter has in fact committed such felony, and (b) for any offense when the latter has in fact committed such offense in his presence” (N.Y.C.L. 140.30) of certain Members of the Court in Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, including but not limited to, Dishonorable Judge Ralph Winters and Defendant and Witness in Plaintiff’s RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit and Witness and former Defendant in Anderson, Clerk of this Court, Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe (“Wolfe”) . Wolfe is also a central Witness in this lawsuit, a Defendant in Plaintiff’s lawsuit, formerly Clerk of the Court for Defendant the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department and now the Clerk of this Court handling THIS LAWSUIT. Wolfe, refusing along with the other accused Second Circuit (Circus) Judges and all those handling these matters preceding them to affirm or deny conflict by signing a simple and necessary affirmed Conflict of Interest Waiver attached as Exhibit 3, prior to ANY action in this lawsuit. A simple conflict disclosure prior to action to insure fair and impartial due process, denied repeatedly by every lawyer and judge already involved in these matters, many now Defendants, in a lawsuit already fraught with CONFIRMED Conflicts of Interest.

Confirmed Conflicts of Interest by Hon. Judge Shira Scheindlin whereby in an order dated March 21st 2008, Scheindlin states, “Any further consideration of the substantive issues raised by plaintiffs, including plaintiffs’ requests regarding conflict of interest, must await resolution of anticipated motions to dismiss.” Where Motions to Dismiss were decided on August 08, 2008 and yet resolution of the conflicts remains un-resolved and thus one must ask how a case fraught with identified conflicts can continue to move forward and continue compiling more and more unresolved and allowed with scienter Conflicts of Interest in order to Obstruct Justice. Plaintiff denied due process from the start, as conflict existed from the start and where due process that is wholly dependent on a CONFLICT FREE COURT cannot exist in a Court fraught with unresolved and further confirmed Conflicts. Whereby Scheindlin erred in attempting to dismiss the case based on pleadings submitted in conflict and must be forced by this Court to first clear the conflicts and then after independent non-conflicted counsel submits new pleadings, then rule, after all those in conflict are removed.

Whereby Plaintiff now again DEMANDS signing of the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure in Exhibit 3 by any member of this Court or any Officer of the Court, including Defendant Counsel, prior to any action, including ruling in any way or in part on this Motion to Kiss My Ass. Let this EMERGENCY MOTION TO KISS MY ASS also serve as notice of additional Citizen’s Arrest for felony violations of state, federal and international law, against the three new signing Justice’s of the Illegally Tendered Dismissal Order, Richard C. Wesley, Peter W. Hall and Debra Ann Livingston and additionally the New York Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo.. Criminal Investigators and Oversight authorities already noticed of the prior felony crimes of this Court will be notified to start Criminal Investigations of the new Members of the Court and NY AG, involved in attempting to illegally derail this Lawsuit and bury the Whistleblower claims of Anderson. Additionally, Plaintiff seeks Leave to Amend the RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit to include all those listed in Exhibit “1” as additional defendants in the RICO lawsuit based on new evidence of the criminal activities of the RICO Enterprise.

Additionally, let this MOTION TO KISS MY ASS serve as formal notice to the New York Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo and all Members of his staff, who continue ILLEGALLY to represent State Defendants, including their offices, in this lawsuit. Representations that are in VIOLATION OF LAW and PUBLIC OFFICE DUTIES, while simultaneously denying Honest Services to the People of New York in prosecuting internal corruption in the Courts, that they too are being reported to State, Federal and International Authorities for their Criminal Acts alleged herein and in Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel. Due to the fact that the New York Attorney General is representing the State Defendants in this Lawsuit, service of this Motion to Kiss My Ass will also serve as formal notice of Criminal Allegations levied against the New York Attorney General’s office. This Motion to Kiss My Ass will also further serve as notice that a Citizen’s Arrest for felonious misconduct made herein also serves as a request for Members of the New York Attorney General involved already in these matters to turn themselves in to the proper authorities for their felonious misconduct and for criminal prosecution under law.

Members of this Court named herein and in Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel who continue to adjudicate despite confirmed obvious multiple conflicts that obstruct in violations of law, violations of attorney conduct codes and judicial canons in these matters, are no longer trusted, in fact, they are suspect and soon to be Defendants in all forthcoming lawsuits and any amended complaint in this lawsuit. Court Members who have allowed these conflicts with scienter and continue to issue orders tendered in Conflict constituting Fraud on the Court, now not only are considered suspect but also alleged complicit accomplices in the furtherance of the RICO and Antitrust claims of Plaintiff’s lawsuit. As the orders of this Court are fraudulently concocted, then conveyed interstate through transmission via facsimile and US Mail, additional charges of mail and wire fraud will be reported to those Criminal Authorities and Overseers already petitioned regarding this Court’s illegal conduct. Whereby, until such time that Law Enforcement and legitimate Court Overseers already petitioned herein and in Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel, can determine the veracity of the criminal allegations and render Your illegal legal actions legal, Plaintiff ignores all such Orders and actions of the Court. The Court’s haughty urgency to dismiss this case, despite the request to HALT the case pending review by Law Enforcement and legitimate Court Overseers, as it is protocol and Plaintiff’s due process rights that any appearance of conflict or impropriety must be removed to allow for a fair and ethical court proceeding. In addition, the fact that Anderson’s case remains ONGOING which is highly reflective of issues of this case at bar, makes this Court and its associates highly suspicious for refusing to HALT the case pending review.

If this Court’s Jesters have nothing to hide, certainly they will welcome a fair review of their actions by their Oversights and Law Enforcement. Again, Plaintiff urges the Court to Halt the Proceedings pending the outcome of the Criminal Complaints and requests for Oversight of this Court’s Members accused herein and filed with Criminal Authorities and Oversights already. All future Orders or Actions while Conflicts exist will further be used as prima fascia evidence of this Court and its corrupt cronies continued CRIMINAL CONDUCT and every action of the Court’s Members will serve as a new complaint for felony violations of law.

Denial of Due Process through Denial of Right to Counsel through Extortion of Lawyers and Court Personnel to obstruct justice, evidenced in LEGALLY RELATED whistleblower anderson lawsuit

It is only comprehensible that the Court continues handling the Appeal despite a plethora of Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Public Office Rules & Regulations, Violations of Judicial Cannons and VIOLATIONS of State and Federal Felony Laws by court officials and attorneys involved directly in this Lawsuit, many acting illegally as their own counsel because they are not truly intelligent and qualified attorneys/judges. Since their only manner to win a case is by illegal and unethical means, their actions are in violation of law and therefore establish a FRAUD ON THE COURT, which ultimately invalidates all orders and actions by Members of this Court. Most interesting is that the Court first attempts to dismiss the Motion to Compel to the “extent it seeks to compel the appointment of counsel” while failing to deal with the multitude of other issues, including the Criminal Misconduct of Members of this Court. As a reminder, this Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit was initially filed to complement and support the efforts of a Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson and her heroic efforts to expose systemic corruption inside the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division. In fact, the very beginnings of this lawsuit are wholly related to Anderson, as Plaintiff was brought into the matters through a former DDC employee, Frank Brady aka Kevin McKeown, who knew or knew of Christine Anderson’s plight and other lawsuits and whereby McKeown and several other lawsuits are legally related cases to the ongoing Anderson lawsuit. McKeown has also given testimony before the NY Senate Judiciary Committee with Anderson and me. Whereby, Anderson in her original complaint mentions Plaintiff’s formal complaints against New York Supreme Court Officers as it relates to her lawsuit and then was so enticed to file a Federal RICO lawsuit in support thereof.

My support of Anderson’s efforts are to help take a bite out of the crime plaguing New York and its dirty courts. The courts should pay Plaintiff’s counsel to clean its own house of corruption that extends to this Court, with a lawyer in Ohio perhaps. For is it Plaintiff’s job as a US Citizen, an individual, to pay for lawsuits with direct ties to a Whistleblower Lawsuit with claims that Public Officials and Court Officials have violated multitudes of CRIMINAL ACTS INCLUDING OBSTRUCTION IN STATE AND FEDERAL COURTS!!! Where the crimes are virtually identical to those I had claimed for several years before knowing a Whistleblower would come forth wholly supporting and validating Plaintiff’s MERITORIOUS claims, further exposing the criminal official misconduct affecting Plaintiff’s due process rights through OBSTRUCTION? Even cases that are not identical, the victims still suffer due to similar behind-the-scene corrupt cronies that converge as to how they can milk the last dime from a victim no matter the circumstances nor the issues. Blatant crimes are committed because the link of the cronies allow for favors and cover-ups and in the long run, the same hierarchy are the ones that ultimately are behind the schemes.

Further, the denial of counsel is an attempt to dismiss Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel without addressing the germane conflicts and violations of law, which would preclude this Court’s handling the Motion to Compel, as the Members of this Court named therein would be under investigation for the alleged felonious Court misconduct. The criminal acts of the Members of this Court are purposely calculated to disable Plaintiff’s due process rights, so that Plaintiff’s rights to private counsel are denied through a system of EXTORTION of lawyers and court personnel by those in charge of the courts. Anderson and (ASK ELIOT TO define Corrado) Corrado each in their Whistleblowing Motions exposed the methods used to silence SUPREME COURT OFFICIALS who attempt to make public the corruption. The resulting backlash is to bully these Whistleblowers for standing up to the corruption, which now causes lawyers and court officials who wish to act as and who do act as Whistleblowers to fear for their lives and livelihoods or comply with the criminal acts. In fact, Corrado had threats levied against her, a New York State Supreme Court First Department STAFF ATTORNEY, on her way to testify in a FEDERAL LAWSUIT by shockingly SUPREME COURT OF NY OFFICIALS, as she went to give deposition testimony in support of the Anderson case. The following sworn statement from Anderson exhibits all of the criminal elements of TITLE 18 OBSTRUCTION, EXTORTION OF A FEDERAL WITNESS IN A PUBLIC CORRUPTION TRIAL and more.

From Anderson’s sworn statement Plaintiff quotes,

Although the then Chief Counsel of the DDC, Thomas Cahill, stepped down in 2007, evidence clearly establishes that under the leadership of Alan Friedberg, the current Chief Counsel, the same practice of corruption and whitewashing of complaints continues. Such practice robs the public of any hope at justice; it also works to the detriment of the very public the DDC is duty-bound to serve.

During the course of my litigation against the DDC, a former colleague of mine, who still works as a Principal Attorney at the DDC, agreed to testify on my behalf at a deposition. This former colleague, Nicole Corrado, has been employed by the DDC for approximately eight years, prior to which she worked as a prosecutor for New York State. On the morning of her deposition, however, while en route to her deposition, Ms. Corrado was approached on the street by a supervisor at the DDC, who threatened and intimidated her with respect to her upcoming deposition testimony. Although terribly shaken, Ms. Corrado nonetheless sat for her deposition and testified truthfully. Following her deposition, however, Ms. Corrado has been subjected to further harassment and intimidation at the hands of the DDC. She has been forced to take a leave of absence as a result.

Thus, honest lawyers inside the court system or outside of the court system fear for their lives and their livelihoods in attempting to expose THIS COURT’s corruption. They are afraid to show their true feelings of spitting in your rotten faces for fear of them being bullied and suffering repercussion. For these reasons this Court should provide counsel for a Plaintiff and even protection for the Plaintiff and attorneys who are brave enough to represent and expose the systemic corruption of the courts if this Court’s true intent is to uphold the law and give justice, otherwise by this Court’s refusal to provide counsel for a Plaintiff and protection for the Plaintiff and attorneys, just confirms that this Court is just as corrupt and in league and partners with the despicable and loathsome bullies in this matter at bar. Private attorneys who would normally represent injured parties also fear taking on these cases where Judges, Lawyers, Law Firms and Prosecutors are named Defendants, for fear they will be disbarred or precluded from business by the Courts or worse threatened in the same manner that Anderson and Corrado were threatened, bullied and eventually suffered loss of their employment.

In fact, the evidence proves that this argument confirms the denial of due process caused through this extortionary usurping of both right to counsel and right to fair and impartial due process by the courts, including on complaints against court officers and lawsuits against them, through this extortionary tactic of threatening lawyers and court personnel to be silent about the corruption or else be bullied, as described by both Anderson, Corrado and the related cases which furthers Plaintiff’s RICO claims. Anderson also testified that she eye-witnessed document destruction of case files and other forms of OBSTRUCTION. Again, further evidence of BRAND NEW Criminal Obstruction of these Federal proceedings deny Plaintiff’s inherent right to counsel, right to fair and impartial law and denial of Plaintiff’s due process rights under the US and NY Constitutions. The very real, non-frivolous, meritorious claims of Anderson are that criminal activities in the NY courts are taking place with not only the US Attorneys and the District Attorneys involved, but additionally for yet the unknown “favored law firms and lawyers” as Anderson testified in US Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin’s courtroom. Perhaps this Court’s rush to dismiss the related cases to Anderson comes in fear that if Plaintiffs are allowed discovery of who these “favored law firms and lawyers” are, the lawsuits that have related cases would all be subject to reinvestigation, the corrupt judges, lawyers and their vine work of cronies would be exposed, arrested and convicted and at conflict free hearings, the wall of corruption would come crumbling down upon this Court.

The Constitutional Rights to Counsel is being prevented through extortion of lawyers by those controlling the legal process and legal establishment, yet even with all this evidence, including the fact that Plaintiff’s case is virtually identical to Anderson’s which exposes the corruption, and Plaintiff’s case which is against many of the same people fingered by Anderson, this Court states that Plaintiff’s claims are non meritorious. Therefore, any conclusion reached by Members of this Court, acting outside their official duties, and in violation of felony law, are worthless conclusions as they are concocted as part of the overall Fraud on the Court proceedings and committed by Members of this Court. We shall now allow the Criminal Authorities and your Overseers to have a say about your heavy-handed attempts to deny due process to your victims through this racketeering behavior inside the halls of justice, that act to prevent honest attorneys, Whistleblowers and private injured parties from exposing any corruption. The Motion to Compel which was already forwarded to criminal authorities and the Court’s overseers is an initial formal complaint of the allegations against Members of this Court and more.

Even though you have turned a deaf ear, Plaintiff will continue to be straight up and in your face. If the crooked Members of this Court think they are going to aid and abet the Criminal Enterprise which is comprised of dirty rotten criminal Law Firms, Lawyers, Prosecutors and Judges, whom with scienter conspire to attempt to steal Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties through the commission of crimes, including but not limited to, Fraud on the United States Patent Office, Fraud on Foreign Nations and Fraud on a United States Court, using brute force Denial of Due Process through Criminal Obstruction to achieve the blocking of Plaintiff’s rights, you are seriously mistaken. There are too many of us that you have abused for too long, therefore your actions to block Plaintiff’s rights to Due Process to Aid and Abet in the theft of Plaintiff’s Intellectual Properties have now added the Members of this Court named herein to the long list of dirty rotten lawyers, judges and public officials masquerading as justice officials that are already Defendants in Plaintiff’s Federal RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit. Plaintiff again reminds you that the case is marked legally “RELATED” to the ongoing WHISTLEBLOWER case of Anderson.

Therefore, take this MOTION TO KISS MY ASS as FORMAL NOTICE that the court officials and others listed in Exhibit “1” are added to Plaintiff’s ongoing litigation and all future litigations. Due to the Intellectual Property (“IP”) matters at stake, where the clock has been frozen due to SUSPENSION of the intellectual properties by the US Patent Office due to ONGOING FEDERAL INVESTIGATIONS, each crooked participant can anticipate legal actions to continue at a minimum of twenty (2)0 years from the time the IP is released from suspension and as all these actions of the Court are part of a larger Fraud on the Courts, these cases will be appealed forever or until justice and order are returned to the Courts and the criminals within the Courts are removed. Therefore, the Court Officials added as new Defendants herein may find this lawsuit going forward similar to a bad divorce that you cannot escape from for the next twenty years or more and as such, Plaintiff welcomes you to Iviewit.

What Is and What Is Not MERITORIOUS in the LAWSUIT before this Court

Fraud upon the court” has been defined by the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals to “embrace that species of fraud which does, or attempts to, defile the court itself, or is a fraud perpetrated by officers of the court so that the judicial machinery can not perform in the usual manner its impartial task of adjudging cases that are presented for adjudication.” Kenner v. C.I.R., 387 F.3d 689 (1968); 7 Moore’s Federal Practice, 2d ed., p. 512, _ 60.23. The 7th Circuit further stated “a decision produced by fraud upon the court is not in essence a decision at all, and never becomes final.

What Is Not Frivolous

1. Certainly, it is not frivolous that this lawsuit has been marked, along with others, as legally “RELATED” to an ONGOING Whistleblower lawsuit by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin. Anderson, the Whistleblower, has fingered the offices of the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department, the New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department – Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the United States Attorney New York Offices, the New York District Attorney Offices, the New York Assistant District Attorney, Favored Law Firms and Lawyers and the New York Attorney General’s Office. Anderson similarly accuses them all of felonious conduct and mentions Plaintiff’s companies Iviewit directly in her original filing with the US District Court. Anderson fingers some of the exact agencies and individuals as the ones that Plaintiff has pointed out in Plaintiff’s complaints, alleging similar and identical ILLEGAL TITLE 18 OBSTRUCTIONS OF JUSTICE by the corrupted officials within the agencies.
2. In fact, Anderson and Plaintiff’s lawsuit share similar defendants, including a member of this Court, the Clerk of this Court who actively participates in Plaintiff’s lawsuit and the related cases in violation of the rules of this Court. Anderson also has as a defendant Chief Counsel Thomas Cahill of the First Dept DDC, accused of almost the identical crimes in Plaintiff’s lawsuit. In fact, Anderson blew the whistle much after Plaintiff’s formal complaints against the same agencies and individuals which Plaintiff complained of, but Plaintiff’s filed complaints were dismissed illegally through a series of Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Public Offices and Law. Whereby Anderson’s almost identical claims filed years later in her lawsuit, confirmed many of Plaintiff’s earlier claims; claims that Conflicts of Interest existed in the courts and now proven not only to exist but now confirmed by an insider gone Whistleblowing.
3. Very real, meritorious and non-frivolous allegations were made by the Whistleblower, including but not limited to, claims of Conflicts of Interest acting to Obstruct Justice through Criminal Activities for Favored Lawyers and Law Firms, US Attorneys, DA’s, ADA’s and Ethics Department Officials. Again, very real, non-frivolous Conflicts of Interest, Violations of Public Office, Violations of Judicial Cannons, Violations of Ethical Codes and Violations of State, Federal and International Laws were exposed by the Whistleblower.
4. Those very real and non-frivolous allegations by the Whistleblower are similar and identical to Plaintiff’s very real and non-frivolous claims of Conflict of Interest, Denial of Due Process and Public Office Violations constituting Criminal Obstruction, contained in an earlier filing with the First Department which led to an Order by Five Justices of the First Department for investigations of three attorneys, and the Chief Counsel Thomas Cahill for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety. Anderson, in her Original Complaint further points to Plaintiff’s Motion filed against these senior Members of the NY Supreme Court and Law Firms that led to the Orders for Investigation. Investigations later found derailed through further illegal obfuscations of Justices and where no investigation has yet been performed and whereby the Justices who have failed to force the investigations they ordered are now Defendants in this case. Whereby, the motion Anderson points to, which led to the Orders for Investigation where directed by Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe, Clerk of this Court, Defendant in Plaintiff’s Lawsuit, Witness in My Lawsuit, initial Defendant in Anderson’s lawsuit, now witness in Anderson’s lawsuit, who aided me in filing the motion and placing herself heroically into the crossfire by allowing the filing to point directly to her damning statements, and also led to the orders for investigation in part. Damning statements against heads of the Departments and former Presidents of the New York State Bar Association and tentacle to former head of the New York Courts, Judith Kaye, is a central Defendant in Plaintiff’s lawsuit.
5. Whereby those very real, non-frivolous and meritorious Orders for Investigation, Unpublished Orders that have never been fulfilled or ruled upon by the First Department since, shows that those judges failed to notify the proper authorities of what they found as required by their Judicial Cannons for now several years. Instead, these crooked First Department choose to conceal and bury away their findings of Conflicts of Interest and the Appearance of Impropriety, in order to cover up the crimes discovered and confirmed against senior Members of the courts and the disciplinary agencies.
6. The very real, non-frivolous and meritorious fact that Anderson has won her claim in court further proved that her First Amendment Rights to Free Speech were violated during her attempt to expose the corruptions.
7. The very real, non-frivolous and meritorious Conflicts of Interest that act to block Due Process by creating Felonious State and Federal Obstruction of Justice. Obstruction that exists in both the Anderson lawsuit and this Lawsuit created by the New York Attorney General acting in Violation of Law through ILLEGAL representation of the accused Public Officials he is obligated by his Public Office duties to investigate.

NY Executive Law: § 63. General duties. The attorney-general shall:

1. Prosecute and defend all actions and proceedings in which the state is interested, and have charge and control of all the legal business of the departments and bureaus of the state, or of any office thereof which requires the services of attorney or counsel, in order to protect the interest of the state…

The NYAG instead of advising their state defendant clients to get counsel due to the Conflict of Interest and Legal Obligations to Protect the Public instead has failed to do anything but put up a SHAM defense in Federal Court to protect the accused, failing Honest Service duties to the Public by conflicting their offices from prosecuting allegations of Whistleblowers and more against Public Officials through illegal representations and more and failing, including but not limited to,

Public Officers Rule 17 2(b)

(b) Subject to the conditions set forth in paragraph (a) of this subdivision, the employee shall be entitled to be represented by the attorney general, provided, however, that the employee shall be entitled to representation by private counsel of his choice in any civil judicial proceeding whenever the attorney general determines based upon his investigation and review of the facts and circumstances of the case that representation by the attorney general would be inappropriate, or whenever a court of competent jurisdiction, upon appropriate motion or by a special proceeding, determines that a conflict of interest exists and that the employee is entitled to be represented by private counsel of his choice.

8. In fact, this conflict is further insipid in that it entirely blocks investigation by the NY AG for CRIMINAL FELONY ACTS now alleged by Whistleblower Anderson in riveting testimony in US Federal Court, before the NY Senate Judiciary Committee and in Sworn Statements, whereby NY AG Andrew Cuomo’s Office is wholly aware of these allegations against their client, the defendants but cannot investigate those they are already representing. Thus, the NY AG should have brought in NON CONFLICTED CRIMINAL INVESTIGATORS to handle the allegations that the NY AG is unable to investigate due to its conflicts and involvement as defendant in many of the related cases to Anderson. This block acts thus as OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE through CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, VIOLATIONS OF PUBLIC OFFICE RULES & REGULATIONS and LAW and must stop. Since certain Members of this Court and certain Members of the US District Court have failed to stop the illegal representation, even after repeated requests and full notification, it becomes apparent that Members of this Court and Members of the US District Court have aided and abetted this RICO and Antitrust Criminal Organization.
9. There are very real and non-frivolous Conflicts of Interest in this case on Appeal before this Court, deemed “SUBSTANTIVE” by Federal Judge Shira Scheindlin, again very real and all very factual Conflicts of Interest, no frivolity here and factually, the case allowed to proceed without first removing the conflicts, thus blocking due process and procedure.
10. Nicole Corrado Threats to a Federal Witness by Public Officials
11. Ongoing Patent Suspensions and Investigations
12. Ongoing New York Senate Judiciary Committee Hearings whereby investigations by the Committee have led to formation of Task Force according to Chairman, Hon. Senator John L. Sampson
13. Ongoing House and Senate Judiciary Committee Investigations
14. Other Related cases all with similar claims and all matching Anderson’s general allegations.
15. Car Bombing
16. Officials of This Court refusal to stop ILLEGAL representations of Iviewit Shareholders and Companies by P. Stephen Lamont and in fact ruling ILLEGALLY on those filings, also to be used as additional evidence to State and Federal Authorities of continued Criminal Activities within the Court.

What Is Frivolous

1. This Court and the US District Court’s Orders are all Frivolous. The Dismissal Order dated blah is frivolous and criminal, as is Scheindlin’s Dismissal Order dated August 08, 2008. Both tendered through violations of Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules and Regulations and Law, serving only as further attempts to deny due process to Plaintiff’s valid claims and further aid and abet those “favored lawyers and law firms” in concealing their crimes. All the while avoiding and attempting to CONCEAL material facts in the case before you, perhaps because Court Officials are steeped in the allegations and have very real conflict issues and other violations of law constituting FRAUD ON THIS COURT, by Members of this Court, merely criminals in robes. Everything this Court transacts in these matters while failing to follow its own rules and law, to say the least, is truly frivolous and at minimum Federal Felonies. As Criminal Authorities and Your Overseers are being formally petitioned to intercede in these matters and determine if your illegal actions constitute grounds for criminal indictments and prosecution, Plaintiff wishes to HALT the proceedings, again pending final resolution of the complaints levied already against this Court, see

SEC, FBI and Others Complaint

@

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274

7. and for a signed color copy for your records, please print and incorporate in entirety by reference herein, the following URL

WARNER BROS ET AL. SEC COMPLAINT

8. What is not Frivolous is that the Whistleblower case has not been completed and therefore how can this Court rush to Justice on a related case and attempt to Dismiss the case prior to completion of the related case?

THEREFORE;

THIS COURT CAN TAKE THIS MOTION TO KISS MY ASS AND MORE AND SHOVE IT UP YOURS. THEREFORE,

PLAINTIFF / APPELLEE, ELIOT IVAN BERNSTEIN CANNOT BE BOUND BY ILL GOTTEN, ILLEGALLY GAINED, ORDERS OF THIS COURT UNTIL ALL ILLEGAL CONFLICTS AND OBSTRUCTIONS OF JUSTICE ARE RESOLVED WITH COURT OFFICIALS.

THEREFORE,

I BID YOU ADIEU IN LIEU PATIENTLY AWAITING THE RESULTS OF CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS BEARING WITNESS TO THESE MATTERS, SUMMONED REGARDING THIS COURT’S FELONY CRIMINAL INVOLVEMENT.

THEREFORE,

THIS COURT MUST HALT THE PROCEEDING AS PLAINTIFF HAS. WHAT ARE YOU IN SUCH A HURRY TO DISMISS THE CASE, JUST WHEN IT WAS GETTING JUICY WITH ANDERSON POINTING FINGERS AT ALL OF YOU “FAVORED LAWYERS AND LAW FIRMS” DRESSED AS HONEST LAWYERS BUT REALLY JUST ORDINARY CRIMINALS?

EXHIBIT 1 – FEDERAL & STATE CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS FILED

EXHIBIT 1 – CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS

Justices Richard C. Wesley, Peter W. Hall and Debra Ann Livingston of the New York Second Circuit Court and Catherine O’Hagan Wolfe – Clerk of the Court

• March 02, 2010 Expose Corrupt Courts ~ Committee On Public Integrity Calls On Feds for Federal Monitor Over NY State Court System – “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” (Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.)

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2010/03/committee-calls-on-us-attorney-and-fbi.html

Justice Shira A. Scheindlin of the United States District Court – Southern District of New York

The New York Attorney General ~ Eliot Spitzer and Andrew Cuomo

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department – Departmental Disciplinary Committee ~ Roy Reardon, Alan Friedberg

• March 05, 2010 Expose Corrupt Courts – Committee on Public Integrity Asks Governor David A. Paterson to Stop Funding State Ethics Committees and Order Immediate Performance Audits

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com/2010/03/committee-to-governor-paterson-turn.html

P. Stephen Lamont

whistleblower christine c. Anderson Related Crimes

New York Attorney General – Illegal Representation / Obstruction

First Department Obstructions and other Crimes

US Attorney – New York

New York District Attorney

New York Assistant District Attorney

Federal Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn

Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Virginia Attorney General, Meltzer Lippe Goldstein & Schlissel, Raymond Joao & Greenberg Traurig

The following CRIMINAL COMPLAINT contains complaints against Public Officials and others who are allegedly Violating Public Office Rules and Regulations, Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conducts Codes, State, Federal and International Laws. Many of those involved have been found violating public offices through Conflicts of Interest and more, and therefore, prior to any action on these matters, all investigators or others involved in the procedural handling of these matters are requested to sign and return the attached Conflict of Interest Disclosure Form, prior to any action.

In addition to the Federal Code Violations below, additional State, Federal and International laws have been violated in furtherance of a Criminal Conspiracy to commit not only Fraud against myself and Iviewit companies, but Criminal Conspiracy to commit Fraud against the United States and Foreign Nations. For a list of Criminal Activities alleged and of all those complained of herein, have aided and abetted, please visit http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/oneofthesedays/index.htm . Note that the laws cited below and in referred link are not complete lists of the Criminal Acts, as due to the denials of due process and procedure in various venues the Criminal Acts continue to pile up daily, also adding new defendants.

Federal Laws violated, including but not limited to,

Conspiracy Against Rights, 18 U.S.C. § 241.

Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law, 18 U.S.C. § 242.

****{ELIOT TO draft as follows and I will edit: include Title 18 #1346, see link for discussionWikipedia link:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Honest_services_fraud

also, comment only government attorneys can use this.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 §1505. Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1503. Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally

TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 73 > § 1505 Obstruction of proceedings before departments, agencies, and committees.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1506 Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1509 Obstruction of court orders

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1512 Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1514 Civil action to restrain harassment of a victim or witness

******{Eliot to comment who is the local agent in each bankruptcy district used? Does the insert go here or within the DEFEINITIONS as specific area of bankruptcy is discussed below? Or on PAGE 50 Under Bankruptcy FRAUDS}

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1515 Definitions for certain provisions; general provision

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 73 § 1519 Destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in Federal investigations and bankruptcy

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 9 § 152 Concealment of assets; false oaths and claims; bribery.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 9 § 154 Adverse interest and conduct of officers.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 9 § 157 Bankruptcy fraud.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 9 § 158 Designation of United States attorneys and agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to address abusive reaffirmations of debt and materially fraudulent statements in bankruptcy schedules.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 11 § 201 Bribery of public officials and witnesses.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 11 § 225 Continuing financial crimes enterprise.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 19 § 371 Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 21 § 402 Contempts constituting crimes.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 31 § 641 Public money, property or records.

TITLE 18 PART I CHAPTER 95 § 1959 Violent crimes in aid of racketeering activity.

While the laws stated above refer to new Defendants, whom will be added to all future litigations, in crimes committed to deny Plaintiff’s due process and procedural rights, others in Public Office in New York have aided and abetted the crimes defined already herein through similar State and Federal Laws. Therefore, let this filing also serve as a Formal and Procedural Criminal Complaints against the following agencies and individuals named below. Evidence of the various violated codes provided with links to prior and ongoing complaints.

****{Eliot to comment on defrauded Patent Office and federal courts – - Does it go here???}

STATE LAW VIOLATIONS NEW YORK, VIRGINIA, FLORIDA and delaware

Criminal violations of NY Law by the Defendants in this action

*****{Eliot to comment what lawful orders are there here? – - Does this go here?}

Part 1

Proskauer Rose attorneys and Lamont(?) And others ____fill in__________________ initially committed the following crimes in order to obtain patent rights:

Their criminal liability is based on the following: (the complete text of mentioned laws is in appendix following)

§ 110.00 Attempt to commit a crime.

§ 20.00 Criminal liability for conduct of another.

§ 105.05 Conspiracy in the fifth degree.

§ 105.10 Conspiracy in the fourth degree.

§ 115.00 Criminal facilitation in the fourth degree.

The underlying crimes were:

§ 125.25 Murder in the second degree.

§ 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.

§ 135.60 Coercion in the second degree

§ 155.42 Grand larceny in the first degree.

§ 170.15 Forgery in the first degree.

§ 170.30 Criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree.

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

§ 175.25 Tampering with public records in the first degree.

§ 175.35 Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree.

§ 195.05 Obstructing governmental administration in the second degree.

§ 200.04 Bribery in the first degree.

§ 200.22 Rewarding official misconduct in the first degree.

§ 200.40 Bribe giving and bribe receiving for public office;

§ 210.15 Perjury in the first degree.

§ 210.45 Making a punishable false written statement.

§ 460.20 Enterprise corruption.

*******************************************

************{Eliot to comment re: Cuomo is not covered by Public Officers Law, but his underlings are.

Part 2

The following public employees_________________ and the NY Attorney General, Andrew Cuomo, committed the following crimes in covering up and protecting the above mentioned criminals in the first paragraph:

§ 20.00 Criminal liability for conduct of another.

§ 105.05 Conspiracy in the fifth degree.

§ 105.10 Conspiracy in the fourth degree.

§ 115.00 Criminal facilitation in the fourth degree.

The underlying crimes were:

§ 125.25 Murder in the second degree.

§ 125.20 Manslaughter in the first degree.

§ 135.60 Coercion in the second degree

§ 155.42 Grand larceny in the first degree.

§ 170.15 Forgery in the first degree.

§ 170.30 Criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree.

§ 175.25 Tampering with public records in the first degree.

§ 175.35 Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree.

§ 195.05 Obstructing governmental administration in the second degree.

§ 210.15 Perjury in the first degree.

§ 460.20 Enterprise corruption.

And they in addition committed the following crimes as public officers:

§ 195.00 Official misconduct.

§ 200.12 Bribe receiving in the first degree.

§ 200.27 Receiving reward for official misconduct in the first degree.

*********************************************************8

Part 3

Andrew Cuomo in addition to the above crimes in Part 2 violated Executive Law § 63. General duties.

Also, Andrew Cuomo violated Public Officer Law:

§ 74. Code of ethics.

2. Rule with respect to conflicts of interest.

No officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should have any interest, financial or otherwise, direct or indirect, or engage in any business or transaction or professional activity or incur

any obligation of any nature, which is in substantial conflict with the proper discharge of his duties in the public interest.

3. Standards.

a. No officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should accept other employment which will impair his independence of judgment in the exercise of his official duties.

d. No officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should use or attempt to use his or her official position to secure unwarranted privileges or exemptions for himself or herself or others, including but not limited to, the misappropriation to himself, herself or to others of the property, services or other resources of the state for private business or other compensated non-governmental purposes.

e. No officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should engage in any transaction as representative or agent of the state with any business entity in which he has a direct or indirect financial interest that might reasonably tend to conflict with the proper discharge of his official duties.

f. An officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should not by his conduct give reasonable basis for the impression that any person can improperly influence him or unduly enjoy his favor in the performance of his official duties, or that he is affected by the kinship, rank, position or influence of any party or person.

h. An officer or employee of a state agency, member of the legislature or legislative employee should endeavor to pursue a course of conduct which will not raise suspicion among the public that he is likely to be engaged in acts that are in violation of his trust.

**********************************************************

APPENDIX OF APPLICABLE NY LAWS

§ 20.00 Criminal liability for conduct of another.

. § 105.05 Conspiracy in the fifth degree.

§ 105.10 Conspiracy in the fourth degree.

§ 110.00 Attempt to commit a crime.

§ 115.00 Criminal facilitation in the fourth degree.

§ 135.60 Coercion in the second degree.

§ 155.42 Grand larceny in the first degree.

§ 170.15 Forgery in the first degree.

§ 170.30 Criminal possession of a forged instrument in the first degree.

§ 175.10 Falsifying business records in the first degree.

§ 175.25 Tampering with public records in the first degree.

§ 175.35 Offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree.

§ 195.00 Official misconduct.

§ 195.05 Obstructing governmental administration in the second degree.

§ 200.04 Bribery in the first degree.

§ 200.12 Bribe receiving in the first degree.

§ 200.22 Rewarding official misconduct in the first degree.

§ 200.27 Receiving reward for official misconduct in the first degree.

§ 200.40 Bribe giving and bribe receiving for public office; definition

of term.

§ 210.15 Perjury in the first degree.

§ 210.45 Making a punishable false written statement.

§ 460.20 Enterprise corruption.

Executive Law:

§ 63. General duties. The attorney-general shall:

Public Officer Law

§ 74. Code of ethics.

EXHIBIT 2 – CRIMINAL COMPLAINTS AND REQUEST FOR OVERSIGHT FORMAL REQUESTS AWAITING RESPONSES

From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein [mailto:iviewit@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Eliot I. Bernstein

Sent: Tuesday, September 08, 2009 1:01 PM

To: Pro Se Cases @ United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (prosecases@CA2.uscourts.gov); Civil Cases @ United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit (civilcases@CA2.uscourts.gov); ‘Deborah Holmes (Deborah_Holmes@CA2.uscourts.gov)’

Cc: The Honorable Glenn Fine – Inspector General Department of Justice, Lonnie Davis Miami Field Office; ‘Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire (caroline@cprogers.com)’; Marc R. Garber Esq. @ Flaster Greenberg P.C. (marc.garber@flastergreenberg.com); Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. – Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris (MMulrooney@JTWAMM.com); ‘Andy Dietz’; ‘Barry Becker’; The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) – Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee (john.conyers@mail.house.gov); The Honorable Glenn Fine ~ Inspector General @ United States Department of Justice (glenn.a.fine@usdoj.gov); ‘The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General @ US DOJ (AskDOJ@usdoj.gov)’; The Honorable United States Senator Dianne Feinstein; The Honorable Harry I. Moatz, Director, Office of Enrollment & Discipline ~ United States Patent & Trademark Office; ‘The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General @ US DOJ (inspector.general@usdoj.gov)’; Mary L. Schapiro, Chairman @ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov); David Gouvaia @ Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (david.gouvaia@tigta.treas.gov); David Axelrod, Senior Advisor to President Barack H. Obama (info@askps.com); Daniel O’Rourke – Small Business Administration Inspector General Office; ‘Frank Brady @ Expose Corrupt Courts (CorruptCourts@gmail.com)’; ‘Robert E. Casey Jr. @ Special Agent in Charge, FBI Dallas (fbi.dallas@ic.fbi.gov)’; ‘guy@nipllc.com’; Jennifer Duck, Chief Counsel ~ Senator Dianne Feinstein (jennifer_duck@judiciary-dem.senate.gov); Jon W. Dudas ~ Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office; Jim Molinari, State Director @ Senator Dianne Feinstein (Jim_Molinari@feinstein.senate.gov); John J. Doll, Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Acting Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office – Deputy Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Deputy Director of the United States Patent ; ‘Michael King, Branch Chief @ SEC Division Headquarters in Ft. Worth, Texas (kingm@sec.gov)’; Steven Michael Cohen, Counselor and Chief of Staff @ New York Office of the Attorney General (steven.cohen@oag.state.ny.us); Andrew Barroway @ Barroway Topaz Kessler Meltzer & Check, LLP. (abarroway@btkmc.com); Andrew Philip Chesler (andrewchesler@yahoo.com); Andrew Philip Chesler @ Tiedemann Investment Group (andrew@i2ihelp.com); ‘Bradley S Shraiberg @ Shraiberg, Ferrara & Landau (bshraiberg@sfl-pa.com)’; Brian G. Utley (brian.utley@teamwheretolive.com); Bridget Smitha @ Greenberg Traurig, LLP. (smithab@gtlaw.com); Bruce T. Prolow (bprolow@tig.to); Bruce T. Prolow, General Partner @ Tiedemann Investment Group (bprolow@tiedemanntrust.com); C. David Brown, II @ Broad and Cassel (dbrown@broadandcassel.com); Carl Tiedemann @ Tiedemann Investment Group ; ‘Chris Abbuhl @ Greenberg Traurig, LLP. (abbuhlc@gtlaw.com)’; Craig L. Smith, General Partner @ Tiedemann Investment Group (csmith@tiedemanntrust.com); ‘Cris V. Branden, Vice President @ Huizenga Holdings Incorporated (cbranden@huizenga.com)’; D. Bruce Sewell, Senior Vice President – General Counsel @ Intel Corporation(bruce.sewell@intel.com); Elena Ramirez, General Counsel @ SGI (ramirez@sgi.com); Eric M. Chen (viconcerto@aol.com); Gerald W. Stanley (geraldwstanley@aol.com); Glenn T. Burhans Jr., Shareholder @ Greenberg Traurig, LLP. (burhansg@gtlaw.com); Gregg M. Mashberg @ Proskauer Rose LLP (gmashberg@proskauer.com); H. Wayne Huizenga Jr., Vice President @ Huizenga Holdings, Inc. (whuizengajr@huizenga.com); ‘IBM Non-Management Directors, c/o Chair, IBM Directors and Corporate Governance Committee, International Business Machines Corporation, (nonmanagementdirectors@us.ibm.com)’; James B. Comey, General Counsel @ Lockheed Martin Corporation (james.b.comey@lmco.com); James J. Wheeler @ Broad and Cassel (jwheeler@broadandcassel.com); Joanna F. Smith @ Proskauer Rose LLP (jfsmith@proskauer.com); John W. Fried, Partner @ Fried & Epstein LLP (johnwfried@fried-epstein.com); Kent Kari Anker, Partner @ Friedman, Kaplan, Seiler & Adelman LLP (kanker@fklaw.com); Lawrence A. Horn, CEO @ MPEG LA, LLC (lhorn@mpegla.com); Martyn Molyneaux c/o Paul Sanderson @ Harrison Goddard and Foote (psanderson@hgf.com); Martyn W. Molyneaux @ Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon LLP(molyneaux@wildmanharrold.com); Matthew Shaw (jwolf@sunrockventures.com); Matthew Shaw (tgarrett@sunrockventures.com); Matthew Shaw, Managing Director @ Sunrock Ventures (mshaw@sunrockventures.com); Michael A. Reale (Realem@prodigy.net); Michael Dockterman (dockterman@wildman.com); Monica Connell, Assistant Attorney General – Division of State Counsel Litigation Bureau ~ State of New York Office of the Attorney General (monica.connell@oag.state.ny.us); ‘Patrick Walsh @ State of New York Office of the Attorney General (Patrick.Walsh@oag.state.ny.us)’; Paul S. Otellini, President and Chief Executive Officer @ Intel Corporation (paul.otellini@intel.com); Richard L. Handley, Senior Vice President & General Counsel @ Huizenga Holdings, Inc. (rhandley@huizenga.com); Richard M. Howard, Partner @ Meltzer, Lippe, Goldstein & Breitstone, LLP (rhoward@meltzerlippe.com); ‘Richard Schiffrin @ Grant & Eisenhofer (rschiffrin@gelaw.com)’; ‘Richard Schiffrin c/o Grant & Eisenhofer (sgrant@gelaw.com)’; ‘Richard Schiffrin c/o Grant @ Eisenhofer (jeisenhofer@gelaw.com)’; ‘Robert C. Weber, Senior Vice President, Legal & Regulatory Affairs, & General Counsel @ IBM Corporation (rcweber@us.ibm.com)’; Robert Furr @ Furr & Cohen P. A. (rfurr@furrcohen.com); Robert J. Henninger (rhenninger@huizenga.com); Robert J. Stevens, Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer @ Lockheed Martin Corporation (robert.j.stevens@lmco.com); Robert L. Shuftan (shuftan@wildman.com); Royal O’Brien (info@bitraider.com); Royal O’Brien, CEO @ BitRaider (invest@bitraider.com); Ryan Huisman (ryan@majestic.com); Ryan Huisman (ryan@ryjo.com); Samuel J. Palmisano, Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer @ IBM Corporation (Sam@us.ibm.com); Stephen J. Warner (102247.622@compuserv.com); Stephen J. Warner, Chairman/CEO @ Crossbow Ventures™ (SWarner@crossbowventures.com); Steven R. Rodgers, Vice President and Associate General Counsel Legal and Corporate Affairs, Director Litigation @ Intel Corporation (steve.r.rodgers@intel.com)

Subject: Docket No. 08-4873-cv – Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.

Deborah ~ Attached is an EMERGENCY MOTION TO COMPEL, I will send copies shortly to the Court. Please process this to the judges in the interim as there are very serious and imminent issues contained in the filing. If you would like a copy of the final pdf digitally signed to accompany this scanned copy, please reply and I will send it over. Thank you ~ Candice Bernstein

From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein [mailto:iviewit@gmail.com]

Sent: Friday, February 12, 2010 10:53 PM

To: The Honorable President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama II (president@whitehouse.gov); Mary L. Schapiro, Chairman @ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov); Enforcement @ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (enforcement@sec.gov); H. David Kotz ~ Inspector General @ Securities Exchange Commission Inspector General Office (oig@sec.gov); The Honorable Glenn Fine – Inspector General Department of Justice; The Honorable Glenn Fine ~ Inspector General @ United States Department of Justice (glenn.a.fine@usdoj.gov); The Honorable Madam Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (sf.nancy@mail.house.gov); The Honorable Shira A. Scheindlin @ United States District Court ~ Southern District of New York (shira_a._scheindlin@NYSD.uscourts.gov); The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General @ US DOJ (inspector.general@usdoj.gov); The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General @ US DOJ (AskDOJ@usdoj.gov); Miami Division @ Federal Bureau of Investigation (Miami@ic.fbi.gov); The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) – Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee (john.conyers@mail.house.gov); Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (Complaints@tigta.treas.gov); David Gouvaia @ Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (david.gouvaia@tigta.treas.gov); Daniel O’Rourke – Small Business Administration Inspector General Office; The Honorable Inspector General Todd J. Zinser @ Department of Commerce (TZinser@OIG.DOC.GOV); David Kappos ~ Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO (david.kappos@USPTO.gov); Sharon Barner ~ Deputy Director @ United States Patent & Trademark Office (sharon.barner@uspto.gov); Harry I. Moatz ~ Director of the United States Patent & Trademark Office – Office of Enrollment & Discipline; Mail Stop OED-Ethics Rules (ethicsrules.comments@uspto.gov); ’sampson@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘onorato@senate.state.ny.us’; ’schneiderman@schneiderman.org’; ’schneiderman@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘hassellt@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘diaz@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘jdklein@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘eadams@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘espada@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘breslin@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘dilan@senate.state.ny.us’; ’savino@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘perkins@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘maziarz@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘jdefranc@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘volker@senate.state.ny.us’; ’saland@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘lavalle@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘bonacic@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘winner@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘nozzolio@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘lanza@senate.state.ny.us’; ‘ranz@senate.state.ny.us’; Timothy Spotts Esq. ~ Counsel @ Senate Standing Committeeon the Judiciary (spotts@senate.state.ny.us)

Cc: Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire (caroline@cprogers.com); Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. – Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris (MMulrooney@JTWAMM.com); Marc R. Garber, Esquire @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.; Andrew Dietz @ Rock-It Cargo USA, Inc. (andyd@rockitcargo.com); Iviewit Breaking News – Read All About It; Kevin R. Hall Esq. (krhall007@aol.com); Kevin R. Hall; Pat Handley (svm231@aol.com); Guy T. Iantoni (guy@nipllc.com); ‘Christine C. Anderson (tallawah@earthlink.net)’; Nicole Corrado (ncorrado242@yahoo.com); Frank Brady @ Expose Corrupt Courts (CorruptCourts@gmail.com); Rachel Maddow @ MSNBC (rachel@msnbc.com); Michael Moore (mike@michaelmoore.com)

Subject: FORMAL COMPLAINT FOR IMMEDIATE DOCKETING AND INVESTIGATION AGAINST WARNER BROS., AOL Inc., TIME WARNER and more

To all addressed parties in the TO field of the Email,

Please take this Formal Written Complaint and immediately begin formal investigative procedures and docket this complaint as such. If you are already investigating the Iviewit matters, please include this complaint in your ongoing file for the Iviewit companies complaint and those of Inventor, Eliot I. Bernstein. I have attached a signed PDF file that is fingerprinted as the formal complaint to docket and have attached a Word document unsigned and unprinted for reading convenience only and to access the hyperlinked exhibits with greater ease. Due to Whistleblower allegations of document destruction regarding prior complaints filed with certain departments, as evidenced in the complaint, please print each and every exhibit referenced via URL’s in the attached document as part of the permanent record to this complaint. As these matters and investigations are part of an ongoing US Patent Office investigation and central to protecting the inventors’ rights please maintain this Formal Complaint and all Exhibits for a period of no less than twenty years or until the issues have been fully resolved by all investigatory agencies and courts worldwide. If you have any questions or need additional information, please feel free to contact me directly, my personal contact information below. Please confirm receipt of this message and all attachments, formally docket the complaint and please note to sign the conflict of interest disclosure embedded in the document as Exhibit 2, prior to any action on your part.

Thank you in advance for your time, effort and consideration of the Time Sensitive Matters ~ Eliot Bernstein

IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

Surf with Vision

Eliot I. Bernstein

Inventor

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL

Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL

Uview.com, Inc. – DL

Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL

Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL

I.C., Inc. – FL

Iviewit.com LLC – DL

Iviewit LLC – DL

Iviewit Corporation – FL

Iviewit, Inc. – FL

Iviewit, Inc. – DL

Iviewit Corporation

2753 N.W. 34th St.

Boca Raton, Florida 33434-3459

(561) 245.8588 (o)

(561) 886.7628 (c)

(561) 245-8644 (f)

iviewit@iviewit.tv

www.iviewit.tv

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress

http://iviewit.tv/wordpresseliot

Other Websites I like:

http://www.deniedpatent.com

http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com

http://www.judgewatch.org/index.html

Http://www.enddiscriminationnow.com

Http://www.corruptcourts.org

Http://www.changecourtsnow.com

http://www.makeourofficialsaccountable.com

www.parentadvocates.org

www.newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This message and any attachments are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. SS 2510-2521. This e-mail message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message or call (561) 245-8588. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.

From: Eliot Ivan Bernstein [mailto:iviewit@gmail.com]

Sent: Thursday, February 18, 2010 8:08 AM

To: ‘Preet Bharara ~ United States Attorney Southern District of New York @ USDOJ (Preet.Bharara@usdoj.gov)’; ‘Jeffrey Zients ~ Executive Chair @ Council of the Inspectors General on Integrity and Efficiency (CIGIE). (cigie.information@oig.usda.gov)’

Cc: ‘Wendy Olsen Clancy ~ Victim/Witness Coordinator @ United States Attorney’s Office (Wendy.Olsen@usdoj.gov)’; The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General @ US DOJ (inspector.general@usdoj.gov); The Honorable Glenn Fine ~ Inspector General @ United States Department of Justice (glenn.a.fine@usdoj.gov); The Honorable John Conyers Jr. (D-MI 14th) – Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee (john.conyers@mail.house.gov); Caroline Prochotska Rogers, Esquire (caroline@cprogers.com); Michele M. Mulrooney Esq. – Jackoway Tyerman Wertheimer Austen Mandelbaum & Morris (MMulrooney@JTWAMM.com); Marc R. Garber, Esquire @ Flaster Greenberg P.C.; Andrew Dietz @ Rock-It Cargo USA, Inc. (andyd@rockitcargo.com); ‘Barry Becker’; Guy T. Iantoni (guy@nipllc.com); ‘Crystal@CrystalCox.com’; TourCandy; Richard Kuse (wildmans@verizon.net); Robert Morningstar (robertmorningstar@gmail.com); Rachel Maddow @ MSNBC (rachel@msnbc.com); Yoel Weisshaus (yoelweisshaus@yahoo.com); Kevin R. Hall, Esquire; Michael Moore (mike@michaelmoore.com); Milton @ Black Star News (milton@blackstarnews.com); Alessandra Dupont (dupontalessandra1@gmail.com); Betsy Combier @ Parent Advocates; Children’s Right to Both Parents Equally (pcalma2075@yahoo.com); ‘Christine C. Anderson (tallawah@earthlink.net)’; Frank Brady @ Expose Corrupt Courts (CorruptCourts@gmail.com); ‘Gizella Weisshaus (GizellaWeisshaus@yahoo.com)’; Greg Fischer (perfect100@hotmail.com); Jackie Weaver (jaweaver13@yahoo.com); Kathryn Grace Jordan @ E.N.D. ~ End Discrimination Now – E.N.D. (info@enddiscriminationnow.com); Kevin R. Hall Esq. (krhall007@aol.com); Linda D. Misek-Falkoff (Ph.D.J.D.) (respectful.interfaces@gmail.com); ‘Luisa Esposito’; Mary Keon @ The Westchester Guardian (wguardianmaryads@aol.com); Matthew Reiss, Visiting Professor ~ Department of Journalism & Media @ Rutgers University (nyreport@hotmail.com); ‘Pamela Carvel (estatecrimes@gmail.com)’; Pat Handley (svm231@aol.com); ‘Paul Altman’; ‘Ruth M. Pollack (ruthmpollack@yahoo.com)’; Scott H. Robb (shrobb@msn.com); ‘Tembani Selepi Xaba (tembani@earthlink.net)’; Terrence “Terry” Finnan (Tskeene@westelcom.com); William Galison (wgalison@aol.com)

Subject: FORMAL COMPLAINT FOR DOCKETING FROM IVEIWIT AGAINST WARNER BROS, AOL, TIME WARNER, INTEL, SGI, LOCKHEED, IBM and MORE

Dear Hon. Preet Bharara, Hon. Jeffrey Zients and Wendy Olsen Clancy,

Please accept the attached SEC, FBI and Others Complaint and immediately begin a formal docketing and investigation of the attached complaint, as it relates directly to your offices and Members of the office who have been named by a Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson, as being involved in the Whitewashing of Attorney Complaints in a Federal Court under the jurisdiction of the Hon. Shira A. Scheindlin. I have a 12 Count 12 Trillion Dollar Federal RICO and ANTITRUST Lawsuit marked legally “related” to the Whistleblower by Judge Scheindlin. The SEC, FBI and Others complaint has preliminary information for your inquiry, including information for investigation of USDOJ employees and please feel free to contact me personally at my numbers and contact information below. Please formally respond that your offices have received the Formal Complaint attached. An online Unsigned Interactive Version of the document with links to hundreds of pieces of evidentiary materials can be found at http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274 a signed color non-interactive copy can also be found @

. Thank you in advance for time, effort and consideration of these matters ~ Eliot Bernstein

Attorney for Plaintiff Bernstein

Eliot Ivan Bernstein, Pro Se

2753 NW 34th St.

Boca Raton, FL 33434

Tel.: (561) 245-8588

By: _________________________ Eliot Ivan Bernstein

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

DOCKET NO. 08-4873-CV

Bernstein

Appellate Division First Department

Disciplinary Committee et al.

I, Eliot Ivan Bernstein, hereby certify under the penalty of perjury that on the 7th day of September, 2009, I served by United States Mail, Email, Electronic Service and/or hand delivered the document titled EMERGENCY MOTION TO KISS MY ASS AND MORE on the Court. Plaintiff requests this Court serve all named Defendants below via the United States Marshal Service or service directly by the Court as the case in prior filings where the Court has served to the Defendants, although it is further unclear if this Court has served documents to all Amended Complaint Defendants or just a select few Defendants. It is also unclear if Defendants’ counsels similarly have serviced only select Defendants’ and not all the Amended Complaint Defendants and Plaintiffs on Appeal despite referencing the Amended Complaint in their Appeal.

Plaintiff requested the Halting of the Case and the Sealing of this Motion and Plaintiff requests that Motions remain sealed until all Oversight authorities summoned in the Motion to Compel filed previously and/or herein have rendered final decisions on the Court and Defendants’ counsels ability to proceed. Therefore, Plaintiff requests not servicing Defendants the requested sealed documents until such time that affirmed Non-Conflicted justices, court personnel and counsel, as requested in the Motion to Compel and herein, are authorized by Oversight and Law Enforcement to continue to operate illegally and outside of the Judicial Cannons, Attorney Conduct Codes, Public Office Rules and Regulations and Law.

The Amended Complaint list of Defendants necessary to service is as follows:

STATE OF NEW YORK, THE OFFICE OF COURT ADMINISTRATION OF THE UNIFIED COURT SYSTEM, PROSKAUER ROSE LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, STEVEN C. KRANE in his official and individual Capacities for the New York State Bar Association and the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, and, his professional and individual capacities as a Proskauer partner, KENNETH RUBENSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities, ESTATE OF STEPHEN KAYE, in his professional and individual capacities, ALAN S. JAFFE, in his professional and individual capacities, ROBERT J. KAFIN, in his professional and individual capacities, CHRISTOPHER C. WHEELER, in his professional and individual capacities, MATTHEW M. TRIGGS in his official and individual capacity for The Florida Bar and his professional and individual capacities as a partner of Proskauer, ALBERT T. GORTZ, in his professional and individual capacities, CHRISTOPHER PRUZASKI, in his professional and individual capacities, MARA LERNER ROBBINS, in her professional and individual capacities,DONALD “ROCKY” THOMPSON, in his professional and individual capacities, GAYLE COLEMAN, in her professional and individual capacities, DAVID GEORGE, in his professional and individual capacities, GEORGE A. PINCUS, in his professional and individual capacities, GREGG REED, in his professional and individual capacities, LEON GOLD, in his professional and individual capacities, MARCY HAHN-SAPERSTEIN, in her professional and individual capacities, KEVIN J. HEALY, in his professional and individual capacities, STUART KAPP, in his professional and individual capacities, RONALD F. STORETTE, in his professional and individual capacities, CHRIS WOLF, in his professional and individual capacities, JILL ZAMMAS, in her professional and individual capacities, JON A. BAUMGARTEN, in his professional and individual capacities, SCOTT P. COOPER, in his professional and individual capacities, BRENDAN J. O’ROURKE, in his professional and individual capacities, LAWRENCE I. WEINSTEIN, in his professional and individual capacities, WILLIAM M. HART, in his professional and individual capacities, DARYN A. GROSSMAN, in his professional and individual capacities, JOSEPH A. CAPRARO JR., in his professional and individual capacities, JAMES H. SHALEK, in his professional and individual capacities, GREGORY MASHBERG, in his professional and individual capacities, JOANNA SMITH, in her professional and individual capacities, MELTZER LIPPE GOLDSTEIN WOLF & SCHLISSEL, P.C. and its predecessors and successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, LEWIS S. MELTZER, in his professional and individual capacities, RAYMOND A. JOAO, in his professional and individual capacities, FRANK MARTINEZ, in his professional and individual capacities, FOLEY & LARDNER LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, MICHAEL C. GREBE, in his professional and individual capacities, WILLIAM J. DICK, in his professional and individual capacities, TODD C. NORBITZ, in his professional and individual capacities, ANNE SEKEL, in his professional and individual capacities, RALF BOER, in his professional and individual capacities, BARRY GROSSMAN, in his professional and individual capacities, JIM CLARK, in his professional and individual capacities, DOUGLAS A. BOEHM, in his professional and individual capacities, STEVEN C. BECKER, in his professional and individual capacities, BRIAN G. UTLEY, MICHAEL REALE, RAYMOND HERSCH, WILLIAM KASSER, ROSS MILLER, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities, STATE OF FLORIDA, OFFICE OF THE STATE COURTS ADMINISTRATOR, FLORIDA, HON. JORGE LABARGA in his official and individual capacities, THE FLORIDA BAR, JOHN ANTHONY BOGGS in his official and individual capacities, KELLY OVERSTREET JOHNSON in her official and individual capacities, LORRAINE CHRISTINE HOFFMAN in her official and individual capacities, ERIC TURNER in his official and individual capacities, KENNETH MARVIN in his official and individual capacities, JOY A. BARTMON in her official and individual capacities, JERALD BEER in his official and individual capacities, BROAD & CASSEL, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, JAMES J. WHEELER, in his professional and individual capacities, FLORIDA SUPREME COURT, HON. CHARLES T. WELLS, in his official and individual capacities, HON. HARRY LEE ANSTEAD, in his official and individual capacities HON. R. FRED LEWIS, in his official and individual capacities, HON. PEGGY A. QUINCE, in his official and individual capacities, HON. KENNETH B. BELL, in his official and individual capacities, THOMAS HALL, in his official and individual capacities, DEBORAH YARBOROUGH in her official and individual capacities, DEPARTMENT OF BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONAL REGULATION – FLORIDA, CITY OF BOCA RATON, FLA., ROBERT FLECHAUS in his official and individual capacities, ANDREW SCOTT in his official and individual capacities, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORKAPPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, THOMAS J. CAHILL in his official and individual capacities, PAUL CURRAN in his official and individual capacities, MARTIN R. GOLD in his official and individual capacities, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT, CATHERINE O’HAGEN WOLFE in her official and individual capacities, HON. ANGELA M. MAZZARELLI in her official and individual capacities, HON. RICHARD T. ANDRIAS in his official and individual capacities, HON. DAVID B. SAXE in his official and individual capacities, HON. DAVID FRIEDMAN in his official and individual capacities, HON. LUIZ A. GONZALES in his official and individual capacities, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK APPELLATE DIVISION SECOND DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, LAWRENCE DIGIOVANNA in his official and individual capacities, DIANA MAXFIELD KEARSE in her official and individual capacities, JAMES E. PELTZER in his official and individual capacities, HON. A. GAIL PRUDENTI in her official and individual capacities, HON. JUDITH S. KAYE in her official and individual capacities, STATE OF NEW YORK COMMISSION OF INVESTIGATION, ANTHONY CARTUSCIELLO in his official and individual capacities, LAWYERS FUND FOR CLIENT PROTECTION OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK, ELIOT SPITZER in his official and individual capacities, as both former Attorney General for the State of New York, and, as former Governor of the State of New York, COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, VIRGINIA STATE BAR, ANDREW H. GOODMAN in his official and individual capacities, NOEL SENGEL in her official and individual capacities, MARY W. MARTELINO in her official and individual capacities, LIZBETH L. MILLER, in her official and individual capacities, MPEGLA, LLC, LAWRENCE HORN, in his professional and individual capacities, REAL 3D, INC. and successor companies, GERALD STANLEY, in his professional and individual capacities, DAVID BOLTON, in his professional and individual capacities, TIM CONNOLLY, in his professional and individual capacities, ROSALIE BIBONA, in her professional and individual capacities, RYJO, INC., RYAN HUISMAN, in his professional and individual capacities, INTEL CORP., LARRY PALLEY, in his professional and individual capacities, SILICON GRAPHICS, INC., LOCKHEED MARTIN, BLAKELY SOKOLOFF TAYLOR & ZAFMAN, LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, NORMAN ZAFMAN, in his professional and individual capacities, THOMAS COESTER, in his professional and individual capacities, FARZAD AHMINI, in his professional and individual capacities, GEORGE HOOVER, in his professional and individual capacities, WILDMAN, HARROLD, ALLEN & DIXON LLP, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, MARTYN W. MOLYNEAUX, in his professional and individual capacities, MICHAEL DOCKTERMAN, in his professional and individual capacities, HARRISON GOODARD FOOTE, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, EUROPEAN PATENT OFFICE, ALAIN POMPIDOU in his official and individual capacities, WIM VAN DER EIJK in his official and individual capacities, LISE DYBDAHL in her official and personal capacities, YAMAKAWA INTERNATIONAL PATENT OFFICE, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, MASAKI YAMAKAWA, in his professional and individual capacities, CROSSBOW VENTURES, INC., ALPINE VENTURE CAPITAL PARTNERS LP, STEPHEN J. WARNER, in his professional and individual capacities, RENE P. EICHENBERGER, in his professional and individual capacities, H. HICKMAN “HANK” POWELL, in his professional and individual capacities, MAURICE BUCHSBAUM, in his professional and individual capacities, ERIC CHEN, in his professional and individual capacities, AVI HERSH, in his professional and individual capacities, MATTHEW SHAW, in his professional and individual capacities, BRUCE W. SHEWMAKER, in his professional and individual capacities, RAVI M. UGALE, in his professional and individual capacities, DIGITAL INTERACTIVE STREAMS, INC., ROYAL O’BRIEN, in his professional and individual capacities, HUIZENGA HOLDINGS INCORPORATED, WAYNE HUIZENGA, in his professional and individual capacities, WAYNE HUIZENGA, JR., in his professional and individual capacities, TIEDEMANN INVESTMENT GROUP, BRUCE T. PROLOW, in his professional and individual capacities, CARL TIEDEMANN, in his professional and individual capacities, ANDREW PHILIP CHESLER, in his professional and individual capacities, CRAIG L. SMITH, in his professional and individual capacities, HOUSTON & SHAHADY, P.A., and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, BART A. HOUSTON, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities, FURR & COHEN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, BRADLEY S. SCHRAIBERG, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities, MOSKOWITZ, MANDELL, SALIM & SIMOWITZ, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, WILLIAM G. SALIM, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities, SACHS SAX & KLEIN, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, BEN ZUCKERMAN, ESQ. in his professional and individual capacities, SPENCER M. SAX, in his professional and individual capacities, SCHIFFRIN & BARROWAY LLP, and any successors, and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, RICHARD SCHIFFRIN, in his professional and individual capacities, ANDREW BARROWAY, in his professional and individual capacities, KRISHNA NARINE, in his professional and individual capacities, CHRISTOPHER & WEISBERG, P.A., and, all of its Partners, Associates and Of Counsel, in their professional and individual capacities, ALAN M. WEISBERG, in his professional and individual capacities, ALBERTO GONZALES in his official and individual capacities, JOHNNIE E. FRAZIER in his official and individual capacities, IVIEWIT, INC., a Florida corporation, IVIEWIT, INC., a Delaware corporation, IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Uview.com, Inc.), UVIEW.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, IVIEWIT TECHNOLOGIES, INC., a Delaware corporation (f.k.a. Iviewit Holdings, Inc.), IVIEWIT HOLDINGS, INC., a Florida corporation, IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Florida corporation, I.C., INC., a Florida corporation, IVIEWIT.COM, INC., a Delaware corporation, IVIEWIT.COM LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, IVIEWIT LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, IVIEWIT CORPORATION, a Florida corporation, IBM CORPORATION.

To be added New Defendants in the RICO and Antitrust Lawsuit through amendment or in any anticipated future litigations and criminal filings:

Andrew Cuomo in his official and individual capacities, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed),

Justice Richard C. Wesley in his official and individual capacities,

Justice Peter W. Hall in his official and individual capacities,

Justice Debra Ann Livingston in her official and individual capacities,

Justice Ralph K. Winter in his official and individual capacities,

P. Stephen Lamont, (Questions about Lamont’s filings on behalf of others and more filed with criminal authorities and this Court notified of the alleged fraudulent activities of Lamont)

Justice Shira A. Scheindlin in her official and individual capacities,

Alan Friedberg in his official and individual capacities,

Roy Reardon in his official and individual capacities,

Martin Glenn in his official and individual capacities,

Warner Bros. Entertainment, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

Time Warner Communications, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

AOL Inc., (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

Ropes & Gray,

Stanford Financial Group,

Bernard L. Madoff et al.

Marc S. Dreier, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

Sony Corporation, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

Ernst & Young, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

Arthur Andersen, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

Enron, (Already named in the lawsuit since the amended complaint filed)

More Defendants or possible Witnesses

Christine C. Anderson, Esq.,

Nicole Corrado, Esq.,

Frank Brady aka Kevin McKeown

Related Cases

Signed

Eliot Ivan Bernstein,

_______________________

Pro Se Appellant and Plaintiff

2753 N.W. 34th Street

Boca Raton, Florida 33434

(561) 245-8588

Eliot I. Bernstein

Inventor

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL

Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL

Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL

Uviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL

Uview.com, Inc. – DL

Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL

Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL

I.C., Inc. – FL

Iviewit.com LLC – DL

Iviewit LLC – DL

Iviewit Corporation – FL

Iviewit, Inc. – FL

Iviewit, Inc. – DL

Iviewit Corporation

2753 N.W. 34th St.

Boca Raton, Florida 33434-3459

(561) 245.8588 (o)

(561) 886.7628 (c)

(561) 245-8644 (f)

iviewit@iviewit.tv

http://www.iviewit.tv

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpresseliot

Other Websites I like:

http://www.deniedpatent.com

http://www.exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com

http://www.judgewatch.org/index.html

http://www.enddiscriminationnow.com

http://www.corruptcourts.org

http://www.changecourtsnow.com

http://www.makeourofficialsaccountable.com

http://www.parentadvocates.org

http://www.newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com

http://www.cuomotarp.blogspot.com

http://www.disbarthefloridabar.com

http://www.VoteForGreg.us Greg Fischer

http://www.liberty-candidates.org/greg-fischer /

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Vote-For-Greg /111952178833067

http://www.killallthelawyers.ws/law (The Shakespearean Solution)

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This message and any attachments are covered by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, 18 U.S.C. SS 2510-2521.

This e-mail message is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed and may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message or call (561) 245-8588. If you are the intended recipient but do not wish to receive communications through this medium, please so advise the sender immediately.

Tags: allen stanford, Andrew Cuomo, barroway, crossbow ventures, eliot bernstein, eric holder, First Department, first department disciplinary, foley & lardner, intel, inventor, iviewit, JUDITH KAYE, kenneth rubenstein, lockheed, marc dreier, martin glenn, MICHAEL GREBE, mpeg, mpegla, ny senate judiciary committee, okun, patent, patentgate, proskauer, ralph winter, sgi, silicon graphics, steven c. krane, thomas cahill, thomas sjoblom, video

Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein Interview with Disbar the Florida Bar’s Radio Host Les Winston ~ The Biz 880am regarding Trillion Dollar Federal RICO & ANTITRUST lawsuit against Florida Bar, FL Supreme Court, Justice Jorge Labarga, Proskauer Rose, Foley & Lardner, Greenberg Traurig & more. Lawsuit legally “related” to NY Supreme Court Whistleblower, Christine C. Anderson who reveals an attorney complaint case fixer “Cleaner”, Naomi Goldstein at NY Ethics Dept which regulates WallStreet.

Press Release Distributed @ http://www.free-press-release.com/news-iviewit-inventor-eliot-bernstein-interview-with-disbar-the-florida-bar-les-winston-the-biz-880am-regarding-trillion-dollar-fed-rico-suit-against-flo-1276897073.html

Disbar the Florida Bar Radio Host Les Winston interviews Iviewit Tech Inventor Eliot Bernstein regarding illegal activities at the Florida Supreme Court, Florida Bar & Judge Jorge Labarga.

LISTEN TO INTERVIEW @ http://disbarthefloridabar.com/?page_id=96 or http://www.iviewit.tv/DisbarFloridaBar23.mp3

World-renowned Inventor of Digital Video & Imaging Mathematical Scaling Formulas, Eliot Bernstein discusses with radio talk show host Les Winston of Disbar the Florida Bar his Trillion Dollar Federal RICO & ANTITRUST Lawsuit, naming the Florida Bar, Florida Supreme Court & Labarga as Defendants. The suit marked “legally” related by Judge Shira Scheindlin to a NY Whistleblower suit filed by a Supreme Court of NY Staff Attorney, Christine C. Anderson, Esq. Bernstein’s Amended Complaint

Anderson alleges the NY Attorney Disciplinary Dept, responsible for the oversight of WallStreet lawyers, has been whitewashing and cleaning disciplinary complaints against attorneys, including US Attorney’s, DA’s & ADA’s. Anderson named a “Cleaner” from the Ethics Dept of the NY Supreme Court, Naomi Goldstein, supervisor at the NY Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee. No wonder WallStreet melted down & attorney regulators go unpunished for failures after causing massive damage to the American People, only to then leave government positions for cushy law firm partnerships. Anderson claimed staff attorney, Nicole Corrado Esq., on her way to testify at deposition supporting Anderson’s suit was threatened & intimated by a Sr. Court Official regarding giving testimony, creating Federal Obstruction of Justice, Witness Tampering & more by Court Officials.

Bernstein suing the FL & NY Supreme Courts, State Bars & Disciplinary Agencies, claims conflicted members of the courts, partners from Proskauer Rose LLP law firm, the main conspirator in Bernstein’s case along with law firm Foley & Lardner, illegally handled complaints against partners while holding official title with the courts & disciplinary agencies. In NY, Bernstein’s allegations led to unanimous consent of 5 justice of the NY Supreme Court to have former NY State Bar Association President, Steven Krane, a Proskauer partner, ordered for investigation for conflicts & the appearance of impropriety. Proskauer’s Kenneth Rubenstein, the sole (soulless) patent evaluator for MPEGLA LLC, ordered for investigation along with attorney Raymond Joao, who claims to have put 90+ patents into his own name. Bernstein claims patents filed by Joao were during & after the time Iviewit retained Joao to patent inventions for Bernstein, Joao patented them for himself instead. After termination as Iviewit counsel, Joao worked for infamous convicted felon Marc S. Dreier, sentenced July 13, 2009, to 20 years in prison. Thomas Cahill, former Chief Counsel of the First Dept whom Anderson alleges to be the ringleader at the First Dept, ordered for Special Inquiry. Cahill’s investigation relates to Krane’s conflicts & Cahill’s role in aiding and abetting the RICO Criminal Enterprise, which Bernstein claims is composed mainly of corrupt mob type law firms. Anderson under oath in Scheindlin’s US Fed Court stated “Cleaner” Goldstein was cleaning complaints against “favored law firms and lawyers”.

NY Attorney General Andrew Cuomo fingered by Anderson & Bernstein for illegal representation of the accused NY State Officials in violation of his public office duties. Cuomo represents the State Officials both professionally & personally on the broke NY State taxpayers’ dime and Bernstein alleges the NY Attorney General is guilty of Felony Title 18 Obstruction of Justice. Obstruction caused by Cuomo’s conflicting his offices with scienter from investigating the accused State Defendants they represent while simultaneously failing to call in a non-conflicted investigator to investigate the Defendants on behalf of the People of NY.

Cuomo is duty bound by Public Officer Law 17(2)(b), which dictates the Attorney General not represent State Defendants when conflict with their offices exist. Yet Cuomo not only represents the State Defendants when conflict exists in both Bernstein and Anderson’s lawsuit but has failed to call in any outside investigator to investigate the State Defendants, his clients, creating a block to prosecution & obstructing justice. Cuomo, Eliot Spitzer & the NY Attorney General’s office are Defendants in Bernstein’s suit. The fact they are Defendants makes the continued representation of the State Defendants by the Attorney General’s office bizarre and further illegal. Bernstein filed criminal complaints with the Department of Justice Inspector General Glenn Fine, the US Attorney General Eric Holder & others regarding the criminal activities of both the NY and FL Officials.

Bernstein is the inventor of digital imaging & video technologies that revolutionized the Internet, Television & Digital Imaging, the technologies valued over a Trillion Dollars over the 20 yr patent life. Bernstein’s patents are currently on Suspension with the US Patent & Trademark Office by the Commissioner of Patents while the Office of Enrollment & Discipline (OED) Director at the US Patent Office, the Federal Patent Bar, investigates Bernstein’s attorneys for crimes including Fraud Upon the US Patent & Trademark Office. http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/USPTO%20Suspension%20Notices.pdf Bernstein claims Federal Bureau of Investigation Special Agent Stephen Lucchesi claimed to be working with Harry I. Moatz, Director of the OED investigating allegations of crimes against the US & more, Bernstein claims Moatz confirmed collaboration with the FBI.

Bernstein calls for the end of attorney self regulation & self discipline by their peers, which has obviously failed, in favor of charging attorneys with criminal acts to criminal prosecutors, warning that victims of attorneys, judges and prosecutors who file with attorney run state attorney regulators are doing themselves a disfavor. Bernstein claims the attorneys gain advantage through using the state disciplinary agencies, defending themselves in conflict and gaining confidential information against them, while feathering their caps with conflicted decisions on Supreme Court letterhead. Bernstein along with Anderson, testified before the NY Senate Judiciary Committee in NY @

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HR8OX8uuAbw&feature=player_embedded

& http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knQLll5hmjs&feature=player_embedded Chaired by Hon. Senator John Sampson, the hearings to investigate allegations of corruption in the NY Supreme Court Appellate Divisions. Hearings remain ongoing & claims made by NY Senators attending to begin a Task Force to investigate victims’ claims of legal process abuse.

According to Bernstein, one look only at the recent plethora of criminal activity in the stock market & Ponzi schemes to see that all of these schemes are run by law firms. Bernstein claims the Ponzis are illegal money laundering operations for monies illegally obtained by the law firms Criminal RICO Enterprise activities. Bernstein points to recent schemes such as Bernard Madoff, former “Sir” Allen Stanford, Marc S. Dreier & Greenberg Traurig’s involvement directly in a Ponzi, as evidence that lawyers are behind the schemes & directly involved in intentionally creating subterfuge of the regulatory agencies that could have prevented these schemes. Greenberg, recall was central to Abramoff’s fraud and linked to the Stanford Regulatory Failures.

Other Defendants, reported to the SEC for alleged Shareholder Frauds relating to the Iviewit RICO & ANTITRUST include Time Warner (NYSE: TWX), Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc., AOL Inc. (NYSE: AOL), Intel Corporation (NASDAQ: INTC), Silicon Graphics, Inc. (delisted NYSE: SGI) & successor Silicon Graphics International (NASDAQ: SGI), Sony Corporation (NYSE/ADR: SNE) , Lockheed Martin Corporation (NYSE: LMT), Ernst & Young Global Limited @

http://www.free-press-release.com/news-eliot-bernstein-of-iviewit-technologies-files-sec-fbi-complaint-with-mary-schapiro-others-against-warner-bros-aol-inc-time-warner-intel-sgi-1268580941.html

and

http://www.iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=274

and

http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206 FINAL SEC FBI and more COMPLAINT Against Warner Bros Time Warner AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

Information regarding these Ponzi schemes and the relation to the Iviewit crimes @

• Information regarding Greenberg Traurig’s involvement in a recent Ponzi, “The American Lawyer is reporting today, May 13, 2010, that the law firm of Greenberg Traurig has been sued for its willful participation in and facilitation of what it knew to be an illegal Ponzi scheme” @ http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=313 Greenberg represents in conflict the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court Defendants in Bernstein’s Trillion Dollar RICO and ANTITRUST lawsuit, as Greenberg was retained patent counsel by Bernstein & therefore acts wholly in violation of law representing Defendants in the matter.
• Information re the Bernard Madoff, Stanford & Dreier connections to Defendant Proskauer @

ohttp://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=307 “Proskauer Rose and Partner Thomas Sjoblom Further Implicated in the Allen Stanford Ponzi Scheme, Failures of SEC in Stanford Cited Further Supporting Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein’s Federal Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Claims”

ohttp://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=256 “Proskauer (Porksour) Rose Law Firm Going Down in Allen Stanford Ponzi, next the trail of money may lead to Iviewit Inventor Eliot Bernstein’s stolen Trillion Dollar Patents”

http://iviewit.tv/wordpress/?p=254 “Florida Bar Under Fire for Lack of Regulation in Robert Allen Stanford & Scott Rothstein Ponzi scheme, Kenneth Marvin defendant in Iviewit Multi Trillion Dollar Lawsuit”. After reading the article, one wonders if the Florida Bar reported this liability in the Iviewit Multi Trillion Dollar Federal Lawsuit to State Auditors?

The legally related cases to Anderson are @

Cases @ New York Second Circuit

1. 08-4873-cv United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit Docket – Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al. – TRILLION DOLLAR LAWSUIT
2. Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.
3. Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
4. McKeown v The State of New York, et al.

Related Cases @ US District Court – Southern District NY

5. 07cv09599 Anderson v The State of New York, et al. – WHISTLEBLOWER LAWSUIT which other cases have been marked legally “related” to by Fed. Judge Shira A. Scheindlin
6. 07cv11196 Bernstein, et al. v Appellate Division First Department Disciplinary Committee, et al.
7. 07cv11612 Esposito v The State of New York, et al.
8. 08cv00526 Capogrosso v New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct, et al.,
9. 08cv02391 McKeown v The State of New York, et al.
10. 08cv02852 Galison v The State of New York, et al.,
11. 08cv03305 Carvel v The State of New York, et al.
12. 08cv4053 Gizella Weisshaus v The State of New York, et al.
13. 08cv4438 Suzanne McCormick v The State of New York, et al.
14. 08 cv 6368 John L. Petrec-Tolino v. The State of New York

15.  06cv05169 McNamara v The State of New York, et al

Links of interest

Eliot Ivan Bernstein

Inventor
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Holdings, Inc. – FL
Iviewit Technologies, Inc. – DL
Uviewit Holdings, Inc. – DL
Uview.com, Inc. – DL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com, Inc. – DL
I.C., Inc. – FL
Iviewit.com LLC – DL
Iviewit LLC – DL
Iviewit Corporation – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – FL
Iviewit, Inc. – DL
Iviewit Corporation
2753 N.W. 34th St.
Boca Raton, Florida33434-3459
(561) 245.8588 (o)
(561) 886.7628 (c)
(561) 245-8644 (f)
iviewit@iviewit.tv
http://www.iviewit.tv
http://iviewit.tv/wordpress
http://iviewit.tv/wordpresseliot

Other Websites I like:
http://www.deniedpatent.com
http://exposecorruptcourts.blogspot.com
http://www.judgewatch.org/index.html

http://www.enddiscriminationnow.com
http://www.corruptcourts.org
http://www.changecourtsnow.com

http://www.makeourofficialsaccountable.com
http://www.parentadvocates.org
http://www.newyorkcourtcorruption.blogspot.com

http://cuomotarp.blogspot.com

http://www.disbarthefloridabar.com

http://www.VoteForGreg.us Greg Fischer
http://www.liberty-candidates.org/greg-fischer/
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Vote-For-Greg/111952178833067

http://www.killallthelawyers.ws/law (The Shakespearean Solution)

Tags: allen stanford, Andrew Cuomo, barroway, bernard madoff, crossbow ventures, disbar the florida bar, eliot bernstein, eric holder, First Department, first department disciplinary, foley & lardner, greenberg traurig, intel, inventor, iviewit, JUDITH KAYE, kenneth rubenstein, Les Winston, lockheed, marc dreier, martin glenn, meltzer, MICHAEL GREBE, mpeg, mpegla, ny senate judiciary committee, patent, patentgate, proskauer, RAYMOND A. JOAO, sex, sgi, SHIRA SCHEINDLIN, silicon graphics, steven c. krane, thomas cahill, thomas sjoblom, video, wayne huizenga, xxx

Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein Support Jack Thompson’s Allegations against The Florida Bar and Greenberg Traurig re Greenberg’s Involvement in $900 Million Ponzi Scheme

Bob Hurt

You do it this way, folks. If your enemy pokes so much as a pinky toe out,

you chop it off. Just like this.

—

http://www.bobhurt.com

Bob Hurt

2460 Persian Drive #70

Clearwater, FL

33763 USA .

(727) 669-5511

http://www.bobhurt.com/subscribetolawmen.htm Lawmen .

http://www.groups.google.com/group/lawmen/files Files .

http://www.groups.google.com/group/lawmen Archive .

http://www.bobhurt.com/lawdonation.htm Scholarship .

http://www.jurisdictionary.com/index.asp?refercode=HB0002 Jurisdictionary

http://www.getzooks.biz/index.php?aff=bobhurt GetZooks! .

https://spideroak.com/download/referral/cebadf6610be7b4dfdea16c890e73da3

3+G Free

—

From: Jack Thompson [mailto:amendment...@comcast.net]

Sent: Thursday, May 13, 2010 11:36 AM

Subject: Notice to my federal judge of Greenberg Traurig Ponzi scheme

lawsuit

 

Case No. 6:10-cv-442

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA

ORLANDO DIVISION

JUDGE DUDLEY H. BOWEN, JR.

JOHN B. THOMPSON,

Plaintiff,

v.

 

THE FLORIDA BAR,

FLORIDA SUPREME COURT,

and

NATIONWIDE MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY,

Defendants.

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR COURT TO TAKE JUDICIAL NOTICE OF A FEDERAL COURT

FILING

—-

COMES NOW plaintiff, John B. Thompson (Thompson) and moves this

court to take judicial notice of the following:

The American Lawyer is reporting today, May 13, 2010, that the

law firm of Greenberg Traurig has been sued for its willful participation in

and facilitation of what it knew to be an illegal Ponzi scheme. Attached

hereto as Exhibit A is the American Lawyer article. Note that by going on

the Internet to the following link one can access the electronic version of

this article, embedded in which is a link to the actual Ponzi scheme

complaint filed against Greenberg Traurig in federal court:

http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202458105019&src=EMC-Email&et=editor

It can be accessed by the PACER system as well, of course, Case 2:10-cv-01025-JWS.

Plaintiff asks this Honorable Court to take judicial notice of

the formal filing of this complaint because the allegations therein

corroborate the shocking culture of corruption that permeates the Greenberg

Traurig law firm, which was retained by the defendant Florida Bar because

of, not in spite of, this firm-wide, top-to-bottom corruption. The Florida

Bar wanted a law firm that would be willing to do and say anything to

protect its corrupted lawyer disciplinary system which the American Bar

Association itself says is fatally flawed and highly susceptible to

corruption. What a surprise (not) that Greenberg Traurig has insinuated

itself onto the Board of Governors of the Arizona State Bar in order that

that lawyer disciplinary entity might look the other way.

No lawyer in the Office of the Florida Attorney General, which

should be representing The Florida Bar as the “official arm” of the Florida

Supreme Court would be willing to do and say what The Bar’s private sector

law firm, Greenberg Traurig, has done to protect The Florida Bar from

Thompson’s rightful claims and the claims of others.   The Bar has Greenberg

on permanent retainer to handle such claims, when it should be using the

Office of the Attorney General of Florida.

If Greenberg Traurig enters a formal appearance on behalf of The

Bar in this case, then plaintiff will file a motion to disqualify that firm,

as certain lawyers therein will be indispensable fact witnesses herein.

That is one reason for this request of judicial notice.

For example, it is not a coincidence that Greenberg Traurig

advised The Bar, as asserted in the First Amended Complaint, to waive all

insurance coverage as to Thompson. It was so that Greenberg Traurig,

without any insurance industry oversight, would be free to violate state and

federal laws to harm Thompson.   It was The Bar’s carrier that shut down The

Bar’s earlier illegal acts against Thompson. The Bar had in Greenberg

Traurig, as the federal lawsuit filed in Arizona District Court indicates, a

corrupted law firm, ready, willing, and able to deprive Thompson of his

constitutional rights just as it is alleged to have ripped off investors in

Arizona.

The four million dollars paid Greenberg Traurig out of Florida

Bar members dues over the last several years bought a lot of lawyerly

corruption-unavaialbe to it if the Florida Attorney General had been

properly representing The Bar. Thompson can prove that The Bar certainly

got its money’s worth of corruption from Greenberg.

I hereby certify that a copy of this motion has been provided

this 13th day of May, 2010, to all of the parties directly, as plaintiff is

waiting to hear whether they will waive formal service of the summons and

first amended complaint herein.

JOHN B. THOMPSON

Plaintiff pro se

5721 Riviera Drive

Coral Gables, Florida 33146

Phone: 305-666-4366

amendment…@comcast.net

Jack Thompson, J.D.

5721 Riviera Drive

Coral Gables, Florida 33146

305-666-4366, cell 305-588-3005

 

“An error does not become truth by reason of multiplied propagation, nor

does truth become error because nobody will see it.” — Mahatma Gandhi

Tags: Add new tag, allen stanford, bernard madoff, eliot bernstein, foley & lardner, greenberg traurig, iviewit, Jack Thompson, patentgate, proskauer, The Florida Bar, The Florida Supreme Court

Proskauer Rose and Partner Thomas Sjoblom Further Implicated in the Allen Stanford Ponzi Scheme, Failures of SEC in Stanford Cited Further Supporting Iviewit & Eliot Bernstein’s Federal Trillion Dollar Lawsuit Claims