New Page 1

Department Filed With

Complaint

Filed With

Filed Date

Conflict/Public Office Violation or Denial of Due Process

Officials Involved

Case Notes

Palm Beach Sheriff

Case No. 12121312 - Alleged Murder of Simon Bernstein filed by Ted Stuart Bernstein

Palm Beach County Sheriff

Filed by Ted Bernstein on September 13, 2012 the day Simon died

Case was never investigated fully, witnesses and suspect never fully investigated.

O/S VINCENT HAUGH #8826 and SGT. CASTELLI

Case was closed improperly and mis-docketed as Hospital Maintenance Medical Records Check. The alleged suspect was never contacted, the family was never contacted after the original interviews on the day Simon died done outside his home. Officers had stated they would be coming back to inspect the home for evidence and take further statements but never did. The handling of the case was done by Ted Bernstein, Pamela Simon and Ted's attorneys at law who Ted claimed knew people who could get the investigations handled.

Palm Beach County Medical Examiner

Palm Beach County Coroner Reports - Case No. 12-0913 - Alleged by Ted Stuart Bernstein murder of his father Simon Bernstein

Palm Beach County Medical Examiner - Michael D. Bell, MD

Filed by Ted Bernstein September 13, 2012 the day Simon died

Original Autopsy did not check for Poison and case had to be reopened for a Heavy Metal Poison Test, which came back with elevated levels of Arsenic, Cadmium and others

Dr. Michael Bell, MD

Case was closed improperly. Ted Bernstein and Pamela Simon stated the autopsy was done by a private firm in Miami but Corner reports contradict these statements and show the body was transported directly to Palm Beach Medical Examiner office on the day Simon died and the autopsy was done by them. When contacted over a year after Simon's death for a copy of the report it was learned no heavy metal poison test had been done despite allegations by Ted Bernstein that his father may have been poisoned. The handling of the case was done by Ted Bernstein, Pamela Simon and Ted's attorneys at law who Ted claimed knew people who could get the investigations handled.

Palm Beach County Sheriff

Case No. 13097087 Multiple Financial Crimes, Fraud, Forgery, Theft of Assets and more 07/15/13 Palm Beach County Sheriff

Palm Beach County Sheriff

Filed by Eliot Bernstein July 2015

Case was never investigated fully, witnesses and suspect never fully investigated. Led to the arrest of Notary Public & Legal Assistant Kimberly Moran of the Law firm Tescher & Spallina PA

Deputy Brian Longsworth #7657; Detective Ryan Miller #7704 ; Sergeant David Groover; Detective Andrew Panzer #6685

Case was closed improperly with the arrest and conviction of Kimberly Moran for fraudulent notarizations and Moran admitted to forging six signatures for six separate parties including Post Mortem forgery for Simon Bernstein. The case was then wholly shut down when Detective Ryan Miller claimed he had spoken to Judge Martin Colin who had instructed him to shut the down the criminal investigations of the attorneys at law, fiduciaries and others involved in other alleged crimes and that he would handle those in his Court. Note that Judge Colin had no right to interfere. Note that Judge Colin had stated twice in a September 13, 2013 hearing that he had enough evidence to read attorneys at law Robert Spallina, Esq., Donald R. Tescher, Esq. (who was absent at the hearing), Mark Manceri, Esq. and Ted Bernstein their Miranda Rights as he discovered and had admission of forged and fraudulent documents submitted to the Court and the use of Simon Bernstein while Dead to close the Estate of his deceased wife Shirley Bernstein in a macabre fraud that altered documents and used a deceased person as Personal Representative/Executor to close an estate in efforts to commit financial fraud and document fraud in order to rob the estates and trusts of Simon and Shirley Bernstein. It should be noted that Ted Bernstein and Pamela Simon who did business with attorneys Tescher and Spallina were wholly cut out the estate plans with their lineal descendants of both Simon and Shirley Bernstein. That with his counsel who later resigned after admitting to fraudulently altering estate documents and transmitting them via mail and wire to perpatrate a fraud on beneficiaries. The case was petitioned to Captain Carol Gregg and Internal Affairs to be reopened and a subsequent report was then opened.

Palm Beach County Sheriff Internal Affairs & Captain Carol Gregg

Case No. TBD

Palm Beach County Sheriff Internal Affairs - Sergeant Gendreau

Filed by Eliot Bernstein January 7, 2014

Case was opened and determined that Detective Miller and Groover were to begin investigating the multiple Felony criminal acts contained with the Moran case and a Supplemental Report was opened involving a multitude of crimes.

Palm Beach County Sheriff

Case No. 14029489 - Supplemental Financial Crimes

Palm Beach County Sheriff

Filed by Detective Ryan Miller et al.

New Case to after Captain Carol Gregg and Internal Affairs had crimes that were not investigated in prior complaint of arrest of Kimberly Moran.

Case No. 13097087 Multiple Financial Crimes, Fraud, Forgery, Theft of Assets and more filed 07/15/13 Palm Beach County Sheriff was petitioned to Captain Carol Gregg and Internal Affairs to be reopened and a subsequent report was then opened.

Palm Beach County Sheriff

Case No. 13159967 - 12/23/13 Palm Beach County Sheriff Theft Report

Palm Beach County Sheriff

12/23/2013

Detective Miller directed Eliot Bernstein to file a separate report for Theft of Properties and more.

D/S RAINERI 5189

Case is still pending and univestigated

Boca Raton, Police Dept

Case #2014-015-141 Boca PD

Boca Raton, Police Dept

11/1/2014

Offcer Cortez

The case was opened as Det Miller of PB Sheriff referred this matter to Boca PD and yet upon meeting with Detectives they determined that PB Sheriff should handle the complaint and turned it back over to PBSO.

Boca Raton, Police Dept

Case No. - 2013008568 Boca Raton PD - Fraudulent Documents

Boca Raton, Police Dept

2013

Officer Cortez

Jacksonville IL PD

Case #2014000865 - Jacksonville IL - Insurance Fraud and more

Jacksonville IL PD

14-Jan-14

Detective Miller directed Eliot Bernstein to file a separate report for this Insurance / Bank Fraud

Detective Scott Erthal

Detective Miller of PB Sheriff was given evidence relating to insurance fraud, bank fraud, interstate mail and wire fraud. Miller stated since the fraudulent documents were sent from Boca Raton Attorneys at Law Robert Spallina, Esq. & Donald Tescher, Esq. to Jacksonville IL PBSO had no jurisdiction. When complaint was then filed with Jacksonville PD it was determined that PB Sheriff who had an ongoing investigation should be the people contacting Jacksonville and complaint was referred back to PB Sheriff as Jacksonville stated that they had jurisdiction and that it should most likely be reported to FBI as it involved Federal Crimes. Complainant returned to Palm Beach County Sheriff where Detectives Miller and Panzer were to notify FBI and get complainant agent to work on the Federal Crimes alleged.

Palm Beach County Sheriff Arrest of Kimberly Moran

Kimberly Moran Criminal Complaint - Palm Beach County Case No. 13CF010745

Palm Beach County Sheriff Arrest of Kimberly Moran

Kimberly Moran was sentenced for fraudulent notarizations and admitted to altering 6 parties documents, forging their names, including Post Mortem forgeries for Simon Bernstein.

Palm Beach County Sheriff Internal Affairs

Palm Beach County FL - IA Case IR15263

Palm Beach County Sheriff Internal Affairs

Attempt to shut down days after filing in an unsigned letter without any due process rights, no contact with victim, no input from victim, no review of victim new information, etc. Crimes not prosecuted although proven and more.

Governor Rick Scott Notary Public Division

Governor Rick Scott Notary Public - Kimberly Moran - Fraudulent and Forged Notary Documents submitted to Courts

Governor Rick Scott Notary Public Division

19-Jun-13

Arrest for Fraudulent Notarization and Admitted 6 counts of Forgery and Fraudulent Notarization but only got charged with 1 Count of Fraudulent Notarization

Despite admission of forging 6 documents for 6 separate people, including Simon Bernstein POST MORTEM, she was only sentenced on one count of fraudulent notarization and stated, along with her employer Robert Spallina, Esq. to investigators that it was a one off thing and there was nothing more. However Spallina in January 2014 admitted to PB SHeriff Investigators that he fraudulently altered a trust document of Shirley Bernstein POST MORTEM and disseminated it via wire and mail and caused a fraud on the beneficiaries and their counsel.

Governor Rick Scott Notary Public Division

Governor Rick Scott Notary Public - Lindsay Baxley aka Lindsay Giles Fraudulent and Forged Notary Documents submitted to Courts

Governor Rick Scott Notary Public Division

29-Oct-13

Sanctioned by Dept

PB Sheriff has failed to investigate the documents, including a Will and Trust alleged to be done by Simon Bernstein approx 40 days prior to death. The documents fail to identify if Simon was there on the day of signing and the witnesses Moran and Spallina have already admitted to felony crimes.

New York Senate Judiciary Committee

Chairman of NY Senate Judiciary Comm, Hon. Senator John Sampson

4-Aug-15

Two Hearings Held, Task force instigated by Senators - SUBJECT: The Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts and the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct

PURPOSE: This hearing will review the mission, procedures and level of public satisfaction with the Appellate Division First Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee, the grievance committees of the various Judicial Districts as well as the New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct
The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court is the entity that is legally responsible for enforcing the Rules of Professional Conduct governing the conduct of attorneys in New York State. The Appellate Division Departments have created grievance committees that are charged with the investigation of complaints against attorneys. Within the First Judicial Department the Departmental Disciplinary Committee of the Appellate Division investigates complaints against attorneys. The New York State Commission on Judicial Conduct was created by the State Constitution and is charged with investigating complaints against Judges and Justices of the Unified Court System.

According to the 2009 Report of the Commission on Judicial Conduct, there were 1,923 complaints filed in 2008. Yet of these complaints only 262 were investigated and of those, 173 were dismissed. This hearing will examine the processes and procedures that are followed by the various agencies charged with the responsibility of enforcing the rules and regulations that must be followed by the Judiciary and the Bar in the State of New York. It will also evaluate public satisfaction with the disciplinary process.

---
Eric Adams / John J. Bonacic / Neil D. Breslin / John A. DeFrancisco / Ruben Diaz / Martin Malavé Dilan / Pedro Espada, Jr. / Ruth Hassell-Thompson / Jeffrey D. Klein / Andrew J Lanza / Kenneth P. LaValle / Vincent L. Leibell / George D. Maziarz / Michael F. Nozzolio / George Onorato / Bill Perkins / Michael H. Ranzenhofer / Stephen M. Saland / Diane J. Savino / Eric T. Schneiderman / Dale M. Volker / George Winner

FL Governor / Florida AG / Florida Grand Jury #19

Florida Grand Jury
Chief Inspector General Case # 201009030002

Bill McCollum Florida Attorney General / Charlie Crist & William Shepherd, Statewide Prosecutor

Aug-10

Bill McCollum also referred us to contact Florida Gov. Charlie Crist. Letter sent to Crist to begin formal investigations and add Iviewit to the 19th Florida Grand Jury on Public Office Corruption. Crist opened IG case Chief Inspector General Case # 201009030002 then closed it to refer it to William Shepherd, Statewide Prosecutor

Criminal Complaints filed re Motion to Compel and State Defendants

To: The Honorable President of the United States Barack Hussein Obama II (president@whitehouse

The Honorable Shira A. Scheindlin @ United States District Court ~ Southern District of New York (shira_a._scheindlin@NYSD.uscourts.gov); The Honorable Eric H. Holder Jr., United States Attorney General @ US DOJ (inspector.general@usdoj.gov); .gov); Mary L. Schapiro, Chairman @ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (CHAIRMANOFFICE@sec.gov); Enforcement @ U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (enforcement@sec.gov); H. David Kotz ~ Inspector General @ Securities Exchange Commission Inspector General Office (oig@sec.gov); The Honorable Glenn Fine - Inspector General Department of Justice; The Honorable Glenn Fine ~ Inspector General @ United States Department of Justice (glenn.a.fine@usdoj.gov); The Honorable Madam Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (sf.nancy@mail.house.gov);

US Federal Bankruptcy Court

Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn re Silicon Graphics Bankruptcy

US Bankruptcy Court

Nov-09

Conflicts Abound in Dismissal by Glenn of Iviewit Claims

US Bankruptcy Judge Martin Glenn

Securities & Exchange Commission

Regarding AOL Time Warner and Warner Bros failure to report liabilities for lawsuit and patent infringement violating FASB Rule no. 5

SEC Chairman, Mary L. Schapiro & Complaint Dept

Feb-10

Hon. President Barack H. Obama II. & US Attorney General Eric Holder

To join Federal Appeal on behalf of US Government claims in lawsuit

Hon. President Barack H. Obama II. & US Attorney General Eric Holder

Feb-09

Securities & Exchange Commission

Regarding Intel failure to report liabilities for lawsuit and patent infringement violating FASB Rule no. 5

SEC Chairman, Mary L. Schapiro & Complaint Dept

Mar-09

United States District Court - Northern Texas District

To join SEC action against R. Allen Stanford Complaint based on correlation to Proskauer and Thomas Sjoblom both sued by Laura Pendergast Holt

Feb-09

New York Attorney General Public Integrity

Complaint Docket No. 09-086 Regarding Attorney Ethics Complaints Filed in Federal Lawsuit and Against Chairman and Chief Counsel of First Department

New York Attorney General Public Integrity Division

Feb-09

Alan W. Friedberg, Roy L. Reardon, Thomas Cahill, Steven C. Krane, Monica Connell

20090217 - Ongoing, received Docketing Notice from Rachel S. Pauley, Confidential Assistant for Legal Matters, Public Integrity Unit

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Case Docket No. Pending Docket from NYAG - Complaint against Alan W. Friedberg

Roy Reardon, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Feb-09

Alan Friedberg - Violation of Public Offices, Conflict of Interest, Appearance of Impropriety

Roy Reardon, Alan Friedberg (Chairman New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary), Monica Connell, NYAG

Filed complaints against attorneys in conflict in with First Department DDC and because they are a Defendant in the lawsuit, their counsel the NYAG, Monica Connell was to intercede to prevent the First Department from ruling on the cases due to the fact that they are conflicted in the matters. Despite requests, the First Department reviewed the matters and opined to dismiss on review, case is properly and timely appealed. Complaints were then filed on those who acted in the Department in Conflict, Reardon and Friedberg. Judge Shira Scheindlin states, following “Any further consideration of the substantive issues raised by plaintiffs, including plaintiffs' requests regarding conflicts of interest, must await the resolution of anticipated motions to dismiss.” This statement affirms that there are substantive issues in the case and that there are substantive conflicts, which Scheindlin claims will have to wait for the resolution of Motions to Dismiss yet department attempts to dismiss cases on review with no investigation. Also, despite the fact that some of the conflicted parties are under investigation by the FEDERAL PATENT BAR.

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Case Docket No. Pending Docket from NYAG - Complaint against Roy Reardon, Chief Counsel

Roy Reardon, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Feb-09

Roy Reardon - Violation of Public Offices, Conflict of Interest, Appearance of Impropriety

Roy Reardon, Alan Friedberg (Chairman New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary), Monica Connell, NYAG

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Case Docket No. 2008-0756 - Complaint against Law Firm Proskauer Rose and Greg Mashberg

Roy Reardon, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Mar-08

Greg Mashberg attorney complaint for violating conflict rules and regulations.

Roy Reardon, Alan Friedberg (Chairman New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary), Monica Connell, NYAG

Filed with First Department DDC and because they are a Defendant in the case, their counsel the NYAG was to intercede to prevent the First Department from ruling on the cases due to the fact that they are conflicted in the matters. Despite requests, the First Department reviewed the matters and opined to dismiss on review, case is properly and timely appealed. Complaints were then filed on those who acted in the Department in Conflict, Reardon and Friedberg. Mashbergs conflict continues in the law firm Proskauer representing the law firm Proskauer against former client, all in conflict. Judge Shira Scheindlin states, following “Any further consideration of the substantive issues raised by plaintiffs, including plaintiffs' requests regarding conflicts of interest, must await the resolution of anticipated motions to dismiss.” This statement affirms that there are substantive issues in the case and that there are substantive conflicts, which Scheindlin claims will have to wait for the resolution of Motions to Dismiss. Mashberg also represents himself Pro Se in the federal case against his Defendant firm Proskauer Rose.

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Case Docket No. Pending Docket from NYAG - Complaint against Law Firm Proskauer Rose and Joanna F. Smith

Roy Reardon, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Mar-08

Joanna Smith attorney complaint for violating conflict rules and regulations.

Roy Reardon, Alan Friedberg (Chairman New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary), Monica Connell, NYAG

Filed with First Department DDC and because they are a Defendant in the case, their counsel the NYAG was to intercede to prevent the First Department from ruling on the cases due to the fact that they are conflicted in the matters. Despite requests, the First Department reviewed the matters and opined to dismiss on review, case is properly and timely appealed. Complaints were then filed on those who acted in the Department in Conflict, Reardon and Friedberg. Smith conflict continues in the law firm Proskauer representing the law firm Proskauer against former client, all in conflict. Judge Shira Scheindlin states, following “Any further consideration of the substantive issues raised by plaintiffs, including plaintiffs' requests regarding conflicts of interest, must await the resolution of anticipated motions to dismiss.” This statement affirms that there are substantive issues in the case and that there are substantive conflicts, which Scheindlin claims will have to wait for the resolution of Motions to Dismiss. Smith also represents herself Pro Se in the federal case against her Defendant firm Proskauer Rose.

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Case Docket No. Pending Docket from NYAG - Complaint against Law Firm Foley & Lardner and Todd C. Norbitz

Roy Reardon, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Mar-08

Todd Norbitz attorney complaint for violating conflict rules and regulations.

Roy Reardon, Alan Friedberg (Chairman New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary), Monica Connell, NYAG

Filed with First Department DDC and because they are a Defendant in the case, their counsel the NYAG was to intercede to prevent the First Department from ruling on the cases due to the fact that they are conflicted in the matters. Despite requests, the First Department reviewed the matters and opined to dismiss on review, case is properly and timely appealed. Complaints were then filed on those who acted in the Department in Conflict, Reardon and Freidberg. Norbitz conflict continues in the law firm Foley & Lardner representing the law firm Foley & Lardner against former client, all in conflict. Further, once caught acting as their own counsel and confirmed by NYAG Monica Connell, Foley immediately replaced themselves as counsel and new counsel attempted to mislead court that they had not acted as their own counsel prior, despite evidence from the NYAG that they had, including having defense strategy meetings with NYAG and Defendant Proskauer under the impression that they were acting as their own counsel. Judge Shira Scheindlin states, “Any further consideration of the substantive issues raised by plaintiffs, including plaintiffs' requests regarding conflicts of interest, must await the resolution of anticipated motions to dismiss.” This statement affirms that there are substantive issues in the case and that there are substantive conflicts, which Scheindlin claims will have to wait for the resolution of Motions to Dismiss. Smith also represents herself Pro Se in the federal case against her Defendant firm Proskauer Rose.

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Case Docket No. Pending Docket from NYAG - Complaint against Law Firm Foley & Lardner and Anne B. Sekel

Roy Reardon, Chief Counsel, New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Mar-08

Anne B. Sekel attorney complaint for violating conflict rules and regulations.

Roy Reardon, Alan Friedberg (Chairman New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary), Monica Connell, NYAG

Filed with First Department DDC and because they are a Defendant in the case, their counsel the NYAG was to intercede to prevent the First Department from ruling on the cases due to the fact that they are conflicted in the matters. Despite requests, the First Department reviewed the matters and opined to dismiss on review, case is properly and timely appealed. Complaints were then filed on those who acted in the Department in Conflict, Reardon and Freidberg. Sekel conflict continues in the law firm Foley & Lardner representing the law firm Foley & Lardner against former client, all in conflict. Further, once caught acting as their own counsel and confirmed by NYAG Monica Connell, Foley immediately replaced themselves as counsel and new counsel attempted to mislead court that they had not acted as their own counsel prior, despite evidence from the NYAG that they had, including having defense strategy meetings with NYAG and Defendant Proskauer under the impression that they were acting as their own counsel. Judge Shira Scheindlin states, “Any further consideration of the substantive issues raised by plaintiffs, including plaintiffs' requests regarding conflicts of interest, must await the resolution of anticipated motions to dismiss.” This statement affirms that there are substantive issues in the case and that there are substantive conflicts, which Scheindlin claims will have to wait for the resolution of Motions to Dismiss. Smith also represents herself Pro Se in the federal case against her Defendant firm Proskauer Rose.

United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit

Case 08-4873-cv on appeal of Federal Lawsuit Docket No. 07 Civ. 11196 (SAS) ELIOT I. BERNSTEIN, et. al. v. APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, et al.
Associated with case
07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al.

Hon. Ralph K. Winter, Esq. - Circuit Court Judge and DEFENDANT Clerk of the Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe

Failed to disclose conflicts of Ralph Winter and Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe prior to acting in case. Both appear to have conflicts in handling the case and both failed to affirm or deny upon written request conflicts prior to action.

Hon. Ralph K. Winter, Esq. - Circuit Court Judge and DEFENDANT Clerk of the Court Catherine O'Hagan Wolfe

Complaints to be filed with State Authorities for violations of judicial cannons and attorney ethic codes. Shira Scheindlin in an Order states there are "substantive issues, including conflict of interest" yet fails to do anything about the numerous conflicts of attorneys, law firms and state agencies involved in the representation of defendants. Scheindlin refers to the case of one of MURDER, although attempted Murder was complained of, perhaps Scheindlin knows more than Plaintiffs. Case is related legally to a Whistleblower Case and other related cases. The conflicts continue at the Court of Appeals it appears.

US Postal/US Marshall

Package # 2305 1590 0000 3670 5543
Investigation # C036249070

US Post

2/15/2008

Hope Haynes - Dianna Baerga
US Postal investigation

Hope Haynes - Dianna Baerga from US Marshall tracking package and missing Complaints.

Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration

55-0804-0052-C

David L. Gouvaia

n/a

IRS regarding failing to investigate and audit the Iviewit Companies despite repeated request.

Ongoing

IRS Fraud Department

Waiting Docketing

Fresno Fraud Division

3/1/2008

Richard Gurriere, Deborah Lawhon & Brian Gould were reported to the Fraud department and the Treasury Inspector General for failure to audit Eliot Bernstein or the Iviewit companies and failure to remove tax liens that have no basis in reality.

IRS to audit and investigate taxes of Eliot Bernstein and Iviewit Companies

Sent formal complaint asking for an Audit of Iviewit companies and Eliot Bernstein to find out about strange tax issues from 2001 and have yet to hear a response. You never can get an IRS audit when you need one.

United States District Court - Southern District of New York

Federal Lawsuit Docket No. 07 Civ. 11196 (SAS) ELIOT I. BERNSTEIN, et. al. v. APPELLATE DIVISION FIRST DEPARTMENT DEPARTMENTAL DISCIPLINARY COMMITTEE, et al.
Associated with case
07 Civ. 9599 (SAS) Christine C. Anderson v. the State of New York, et al.

The Honorable Shira A. Scheindlin

12-Dec-08

N/A

Christine Anderson files federal lawsuit claiming whitewashing and other crimes at the New York Unified Court System, naming Iviewit in initial filing of case. Eliot Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont file federal lawsuit for 1.5 Billion against NYUCS First Department and others with Hon. Shira Scheindlin who then associates Anderson with lawsuit filed by Eliot I. Bernstein and P. Stephen Lamont.

House & Senate Judiciary Committee’s

John Dingell, Chairman of the House Energy & Commerce Committee forwards Iviewit former CEO, P. Stephen Lamont's complaint to Nita Lowey to the Judiciary Committee for investigation.

Dianne Feinstein petitioned for "Act of Congress" regarding Iviewit patent issues

House Judiciary Committee by The Honorable John Dingell to Sampak Garg & Shauna Winters

Introduced January 2007

P. Stephen Lamont, former Iviewit CEO, files complaint with Nita Lowey regarding his personal interests in the Iviewit companies and informs her of crimes against the United States Patent & Trademark Office, other United States agencies and international crimes against foreign nations.

Lowey passes the information to John Dingell, House Energy and Commerce Committee

Dingell forwards complaint to Sam Garg, House Judiciary Committee

Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein petitions Hon. Senator Dianne Feinstein of the Senate Judiciary Committee on behalf of inventor protections under Article 1, Sec. 8, Clause 8.

House Energy & Commerce Committee

Nita Lowey forwards complaint of P. Stephen Lamont, former Iviewit CEO, to the Energy & Commerce Committee for investigation

Representative John Dingell

2007

Dingell forwards complaint to House Judiciary Committeee.

The Honorable Senator Dianne Feinstein

Appeal for Congress to intervene on behalf of inventor Bernstein under (i) Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 inventor protections (ii) Due Process & Procedure (iii) Civil Right to Life and (iv) notify Congress of crimes directly against the United States. Language is also sent to ammend the Patent Act with a proposed bill to protect the intellectual properties while investigations are ongoing

The Honorable Senator Dianne Feinstein

2006-2007

Feinstein office to contact various agencies to gather status of cases.

Waiting for response from office concerning the best places to take the complaint filed within Congress.

Petition to Feinstein asks for Government oversight as criminals have violated public offices of a multiplicity of government agencies in attempts to defraud inventors’ of inventions. Criminals have also committed hosts of crimes against the government and the petition calls for the government to begin investigating and prosecuting crimes against the United States

Call for government to be accountable for all investigations that have been found fraught with conflicts.

Call for Congress to enact legislation that suspends patents indefinitely while investigations are ongoing to protect patents from loss in opposite of the Constitution.

Call for Congress to enact protections for inventors and others lives, after car bombing.

Alert of potential Patentgate

Department of Justice – Office of Inspector General

Referred by FBI to investigate missing case files and investigators at the West Palm Beach Florida FBI offices and the United States Attorney for Southern District of Florida.

The Honorable Glenn Fine

2007

In progress, DOJ OIG has referred the matters to the FBI OPR to formally begin investigation.

Federal Bureau of Investigation – Office of Professional Responsibility

Directed to FBI OPR to investigate missing Iviewit case file from FBI & US Attorney Office Southern District Florida

H. Marshall Jarrett

June 2007 formal written complaint

Ongoing - In 2007 Initially FBI OPR refuses to allow Iviewit to talk to anyone in their offices, despite referral by the Department of Justice Inspector General and by referral from the FBI West Palm Beach, FL, directing formal written complaint for immediate investigation of FBI West Palm Beach and US Attorney Offices. Iviewit files formal written request for investigation. FBI OPR responds in writing that they are investigating the matters.

Federal Bureau of Investigation

Written Statement with evidence and witnesses. Personal interviews by Lucchesi and others with Eliot I. Bernstein, Mark Gaffney, Esq. & P. Stephen Lamont

Special Agent Stephen Luchessi - West Palm Beach FBI by Iviewit Management and Shareholders

Formal Investigation - Ongoing Since 2000

Denial of Due Process

Stephen Lucchesi

2007 FBI directs Iviewit to the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility and the Department of Justice – Office of Inspector General to investigate possible corruption within the FBI and the US Attorney Office as no file information exists.

2007 FBI states that Lucchesi has retired with the case file and no one has any information regarding Iviewit. Case file lost.

2005 Luchessi confirms contact with Moatz to formally investigate federal crimes against the USPTO and Commerce Department.

2004 - 2005 Luchessi states he has taken complaints to US Attorney for Southern District of Florida for formal review and prosecution.

2002-2003 Original Evidence, CD’s with documentation, taped calls, witness lists and sworn statements delivered to Lucchesi. Meetings with Eliot Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont and Mark Gaffney, Esq. with Lucchesi and other FBI agents specializing in crimes committed by law firms.

2000-2001 FBI initially notified in the Long Beach, CA office that death threats had been made against inventor Bernstein and that Harry Moatz of the patent office had been apprised of possible fraud against the USPTO. Formal complaints of the death threats were filed
with the Rancho Palos Verdes, CA local PD offices

FBI/Boynton Beach Fire Dept & The Florida Fire Marshall

Car Bomb planted in inventor Eliot I. Bernstein's family mini-van only hours before they were to pick the car up from a several month servicing. The car had been vandalized and robbed prior to being taken to the shop where the bomb was planted. http://www.iviewit.tv/Image Gallery/auto/1.htm

FBI, Special Agent ~ Stephen Luchessi & Boynton Beach Fire Investigator Rick Lee/The Florida Fire Marshall

Formal Investigation - Ongoing Since 2005 -

Denial of Due Process

Special Agent, Stephen Lucchesi, West Palm Beach FBI

Fire Investigator, Rick Lee, Boynton Beach Florida Fire Department

State of Florida Fire Marshall

Status of investigation unknown after referring Rick Lee to Lucchesi at FBI.

No protections instituted for inventor Bernstein or his family, despite the attempt and threats on their lives.

Fire investigator Rick Lee determines that accelerants were used and that the act was intentional not accidental. Lee states that an officer was there at scene minutes after the explosion and videotaped the entire event of all four cars being destroyed.

Bernstein's are forced to flee Florida again for their lives. The first time the Bernstein’s were forced to flee their Florida residence was in 2001 after Brian G. Utley threatened the life on inventor Bernstein if he exposed the crimes initially exposed by Arthur Andersen and others.

Images @ http://www.iviewit.tv and http://www.iviewit.tv/Image Gallery/auto/1.htm
***Car originally was taken to auto body shop for battery replacement, while the car was there, it was broken into and all wiring stripped as if someone were removing listening devices planted in car. Investigators stated the stereo was stolen and tv but pictures of the car after the fact, show the stereo and tv in place. The car was then moved to another auto body shop as it also looked like it had been
rolled on its side.

At the second auto body shop, after months, the car was deemed ready to pick up the following day at 11am. At 2am the car blew up.

U.S. Attorney, Southern District Florida

Case brought by FBI, Special Agent, Luchessi

UNKNOWN -

Formal Investigation - Ongoing since 2004

Denial of Due Process

Case Agent is unknown as it appears no documents exist between the FBI and US attorney regarding Iviewit.

2007 – US Attorney Office has no records of the Iviewit case or any determinations that may have been made. The missing case from the FBI, along with the missing case at the US Attorney leads to FBI OPR and DOJ OIG investigations of possible internal corruption. Iviewit requests of FBI OPR to investigate where and who handled the Iviewit case for the FBI and who is responsible for missing case files

2004-2007 Unknown status of investigation

United States Patent & Trademark Office

Petition for Change of Inventors based on charges of fraud on the United States

Jon W. Dudas ~ Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office on advisement of Harry I. Moatz, USPTO-OED Director Inventors & Investor Crossbow Ventures / Small Business Administration filed complaint

Formal Investigation - Ongoing Since 2003

Denial of Due Process

Jon W. Dudas, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office

John J. Doll, Commissioner for Patents & Trademark

Mindy Fleisher, Chief of Staff - Office of Commissioner of Patents

Ira Lazarus, Supervisory Petition Office

Investigation has led to suspensions of patent applications by the Commissioner pending investigation outcome

Petition for continued suspension by inventors is granted by the Commissioners’ office pending investigation into the alleged patent crimes and then requests for continued suspensions are entirely ignored failing to ensure due process and procedure

Investigation may cause loss of inventor rights as current law is not in place for issues where patent bar members have committed fraud against the United States and USPTO and investigations take longer than current suspension laws allow for. Congress is petitioned via Dianne Feinstein, by inventor Eliot I. Bernstein for changes to legislation to protect inventor rights.

Moatz advises inventors to call upon Congress to intercede where inventors, owners and assignees on intellectual properties have been falsified, to pursue having the intellectual properties corrected and returned to the true and proper inventors

The inventors are unable to make changes or gain information where they are not listed on the patents under current law. Federal criminal actions must be first tried to return the stolen properties before Iviewit and Inventors can make changes and claim ownership.

Commissioner of Patents apprised of OED investigations into approximately nine lawyers and law firms

United States Patent & Trademark Office ~ Office of Enrollment & Discipline

Formal complaints filed with evidence and witnesses provided. Formal investigation of allegations of fraud on the USPTO by registered members of the federal Patent Bar

Director, Harry I. Moatz by Eliot I. Bernstein & P. Stephen Lamont

Formal Investigation - Ongoing Since 1999

Formal investigation of law firms and patent attorneys
     Proskauer Rose (Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, others)
     Foley & Lardner (William J. Dick, Steven Becker & Douglas Bohem
     Blakely, Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman (Norman Zafman, Thomas Coester, others)
     Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel (Raymond Joao, others)
     Schiffrin & Barroway (Andrew Barroway, Krishna Narine, others)

Per Moatz, he has begun formal investigation with Special Agent Stephen Luchessi of the FBI concerning the federal crimes committed against the USPTO and United States by the aforementioned law firms and lawyers

Moatz designs patent office team to get inventions suspended at USPTO and directs inventors to file fraud upon the USPTO

Moatz advises inventors to seek congressional intervention regarding a variety of patent issues

Patents are found in former management Brian Utley’s name, patents end up in fraudulent companies and some patents are entirely listed under names that USPTO cannot disclose under privacy laws. Moatz suggests to contact Congress for an Act of Congress to release the information to the true and proper inventors

Patents, 90 patents, are found in former patent counsel Raymond Joao’s name

United States Supreme Court

Case No. 05-6611 Eliot I. Bernstein v. The Florida Bar - Certiorari of Florida Supreme Court Case SC-1078

• Justices
?
?
?
?
?
?
Do not know which Justices reviewed and denied this. Sandra Day Oconner?

Denied. Although United States Solicitor General was invited to undertake the crimes alleged against the United States, no response to court or Bernstein was ever tendered in response prior to the Supreme Court denying hearing the case.

Denial of Due Process

Don't know who decided this or how. Supreme Court states this is not public information.

Court denied hearing of case, precluding Iviewit shareholders from advancing claims against attorney's caught violating Supreme Court of Florida public offices.

Denying the case set a "Catch 22" whereby citizens were precluded rights to have formal docketing of complaints against public officials and with no state or federal forum to file against them.

United States Bankrupty Court Southern District of Florida

Case No. 01-33407-BKC-SHF- Intel (RYJO), Brian Utley, Raymond Hersh and Michael Reale file involuntary bankruptcy against Iviewit.com LLC

U.S. Bankruptcy Court
Southern District of Florida
Judge unknown

IB dropped by Plaintiffs upon Iviewit retaining counsel to replace counsel that was prior unknown, acting on the companies behalf. Case will be appealed based upon startling new evidence, once due process can be assured in a conflict free forum.

Case filed illegally by Proskauer Rose Management (Brian Utley, Michael Real & Raymond Hersh) and Strategic Partner Real 3D (Intel, Silicon Graphics Inc. & Lockheed Martin. Company that involuntary was filed on was illegally set up to steal Iviewit intellectual properties

Don’t have information on the ruling judge in the matter.

Notified FBI of the IB Fraud. Iviewit was notified by investors in 2001 while doing a Private Placement with Wachovia that they were in a billing lawsuit with Proskauer Rose and an involuntary bankruptcy with Real 3D, Inc./Intel former management and Iviewit former management Iviewit never heard of these legal actions and at time did not know there were duplicate named companies involved in a scheme to steal the technologies. Each action was represented by counsel that Iviewit had no idea was representing them and had not retained them.

Iviewit retained legal counsel to investigate how these legal actions could be instigated without shareholder or management consent. It was later learned that stolen intellectual properties were being funneled into companies set up by former counsel whereby the attorneys were the shareholders of the similar and identically named companies to the Iviewit companies. A sophisticated shell game of corporations and intellectual properties in attempt to defraud the United States, the inventors and shareholders. In so designing this artifice to defraud, applications in false inventors names for the Iviewit inventions were then filed fraudulently in violation of federal code and finally further filed in over thirty countries in violation of international treatises.

Upon learning of the falsified applications in the companies the IB was filed on, Harry I. Moatz directed Iviewit to notify the Commissioner of Patents that Fraud on the USPTO had occured. He then assembled a team to get the Intellectual Property into Suspension, the IP remains suspended since.

Small Business Administration

Eric M. Thorson - Inspector General & Daniel O'Rourke - Asst to Inspector General. Originally filed with Inspector General Damelin’s office with Kevin Kupperbusch and Tim Marcum

10/4/2004

Eric M. Thorson - Inspector General & Daniel O'Rourke - Asst to Inspector General.

Ongoing - 2007 02 27 spoke to O'Rourke Office getting info and getting back to us on where Crossbow audit and investigation has gone.

AICPA

Case No. TNS 2004-038 - Written Statement with evidence and witnesses that Gerald Lewin had violated ethical codes of conduct

Elizabeth Boltz, CPA originally started investigation. New investigator replaced her and dismissed the case due to too busy?

Deferred to Florida Department of Professional Regulation after two years whereby investigation was underway and then new investigator stated the department did not have the resources to investigate further.

Denial of Due Process

Elizabeth Boltz

The AICPA was apprised that crimes had been committed against the federal Small Business Administration and other United States departments and started an investigation.

A new investigator took over the case and stated the AICPA was to busy to further investigate and to contact Florida State authorities?

Despite overwhelming evidence that the accountant, Gerald Lewin and his daughter Erika were part of misleading Arthur Andersen auditors, were involved in crimes against the United States and were under investigation, the claim was that they had no resources to investigate.

Boca Raton, Florida Police Complaint 1

Case No. 2001-054580 Embezzlement/Theft of Proprietary Equipment

J. Ulloa by William Kasser

6/20/2001Brian G. Utley & Michael Reale found in possession of stolen proprietary equipment and forced to return stolen property by Boca PD.

Denial of Due Process, Violation of Public Office

J. Ulloa

Upon requests to re-open the case due to further evidence submissions entailing more criminal activities, including fraud on the United States, Detective Robert Flechaus stated he began new investigations with the SEC. The SEC denied ever being involved, information forwarded to FBI.

Boca Raton, Florida Police Complaint 1

Case # Stolen SBA and Corporate Funds over $1,000,000 including SBA funds

Detective Robert Flechaus - Removed from case for internal affairs review

Ongoing

Denial of Due Process, Violation of Public Office

Detective, Robert Flechaus, Boca Raton PD

Chief of Police, Andrew Scott, Boca Raton, PD

Assistant Chief, James Burke

Internal Affairs

Case is under investigation and internal review by Chief Andrew Scott of the Boca Raton PD

Boca Raton, Florida Police Complaint 2

Case # - Stolen Patents and Crimes Against the USPTO & SBA

Detective Robert Flechaus - Removed from case for internal affairs review.

Ongoing

Denial of Due Process, Violation of Public Office

Detective, Robert Flechaus, Boca Raton PD

Chief of Police, Andrew Scott, Boca Raton, PD

Assistant Chief, James Burke

Internal Affairs

Case is under investigation and internal review by Chief Andrew Scott of the Boca Raton PD

Boca Raton Police Internal Affairs Investigation

Case #Unknown

Chief Andrew Scott

Ongoing

Denial of Due Process, Violation of Public Office

Chief of Police, Andrew Scott, Boca Raton, PD

Internal Affairs

Case is under investigation and internal review by Chief Andrew Scott of the Boca Raton PD

Securities & Exchange Commission

Case # Unknown

Securities & Exchange Commission

William Riley

Doreen Mosemer

Boca Raton PD gave Iviewit names of investigators for the SEC who had never heard of the Iviewit matters and had never been invited to meetings the Boca PD claimed they were to attend. Iviewit asked investigators to begin investigations of the Iviewit and Boca PD matters

Attorney General Andrew Cuomo - State of New York

Case # #07-507

Public Integrity Division

Refused to Investigate with no explanation

Denial of Due Process

Andrew Cuomo
Rachel S. Pauley

Refused to Investigate with no explanation

New York State Commission of Investigation

Declined to investigate

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Filed Complaint with First Department against First Department Chair Roy L. Reardon and Chief Counsel Alan W. Friedberg

Alan W. Friedberg and Roy L. Reardon

Investigated matters while in lawsuit and represented by NYAG as counsel, violating fundemental conflict laws

Denial of Due Process and Violations of Public Offices

Alan W. Friedberg and Roy L. Reardon

Waiting formal docketing as of Feb. 2009

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Filed Complaint with First Department against attorney from Foley and Proskauer and the firms for conflict in Scheindlin Court

Mar-08

Wating for docketing formally. Monica Connell, Attorney General Office, also counsel to defendants in Scheindlin case is to get case numbers, etc.

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Petition for Investigation of Steven Krane, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Joao for conflict of interest, appearance of impropriety and crimes against the United States

First Dept Justices: Angela M. Mazzarelli, Richard T. Andrias, David B. Saxe, David Friedman & Lewis A. Gonzalez

By unanimous vote -Order for Formal Investigation & Disposition of Conflicts and Appearance of Impropriety - Unpublished Orders M3198 - Steven C. Krane / M2820 Kenneth Rubenstein and M3212 Raymond A. Joao

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

First Dept Justices: Angela M. Mazzarelli, Richard T. Andrias, David B. Saxe, David Friedman & Lewis A. Gonzalez

Court order for investigation never completed. Waiting for new forum that is conflict free to file for enforcement of court order.

Court fails to enforce court ordered investigations

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Complaint against Steven C. Krane, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel.

Complaint No. 2004.1883 Steven C. Krane, Esq. - Proskauer Rose LLP Intellectual Property Partner - Former President NYSBA & Officer First Dept

Thomas Cahill, removed from case for conflict & appearance of impropriety, under special inquiry investigation

Supreme Court of New York - Appellate Division First Department - Justices Order Investigation for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety. Unanimous Vote

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel, First Dept Departmental Disciplinary Committee

Steven C. Krane, Officer Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Former President of New York State Bar. His one year blackout from involvement in any bar case is violated, along with multiple other conflicts and violations of public office. Krane fails to disclose conflicts with multiple conflicting public offices he maintains in the New York Courts and Disciplinary Departments, prior to representing his Proskauer partners and himself.

Judith Kaye, Married to Proskauer Intellectual propety partner Stephen Kaye and where Krane formerly was her clerk. Information was transmitted to her offices and buried and no conflict was admitted until later discovered.

Joseph Wigley, Bar Counsel

Cases transferred for formal investigation, after review and deliberation of conflicts and appearance of impropriety by five justices of the New York First Department

Case originally dismissed upon review without investigation due to conflicts found in Steven Krane handling of complaints in violation of public office almost two years after it had begun.

Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel, First Department now under special inquiry investigation for his part in aiding and abetting Krane, Rubenstein & Joao

Cahill upon request of Moatz of the USPTO-OED to contact him would not contact Moatz to enjoin investigations and prior to the federal OED investigation being completed tried to dismiss the cases without any formal investigation. At that time it was unknown that Krane was a leading disciplinary committee member with multiple roles at the First Dept. while handling complaints against his partners and then himself

Krane writes response to his own complaint denying roles at the First Dept. Iviewit then finds from Clerk of the Court that Krane has departmental roles and should not be handling his
own complaint at the department

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Complaint against Steven C. Krane, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel.

Case No. T-1689-04 Steven C. Krane, Esq. - Proskauer Rose LLP Intellectual Property Partner - Former President NYSBA & Member First Dept

Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel - CONFLICTS ADMITTED WITH ACCUSED STEVEN KRANE

Failed to complete First Dept. court ordered investigation. Waiting for conflict free forum to press for full investigation as ordered.

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel, Second Dept Departmental Disciplinary Committee

James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of the Court, Second Department

A. Gail Prudenti, Presiding Justice, Second Department

Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman, State of New York Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts:

Further conflicts and violations of public offices were found and the Court Ordered Investigations by the First Department were never formally completed

Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel , Second Dept DDC, writes Iviewit that cases were dismissed without investigation. No witnesses provided were called, no evidence tested and she claims she is not under the jurisdiction of the First Dept and therefore does not have to investigate under the court order

Kearse fails to respond to the First Dept with her decisions and instead attempts to dismiss the case through contacting Iviewit who did not order the investigation

Kearse admits conflicts with both Krane and Chief Judge of New York, Judith Kaye.

Kearse fails to disclose conflicts prior to handling the complaints

Kearse refuses to docket formally complaints against herself and Lawrence DiGiovanni, Chairman of the Second Dept DDC

Clerk of the Court, Pelzer (with no authority under the Disciplinary Dept., attempts to write letter stating that Krane did no wrong, Krane puts forth no statement to the Court ordered investigation as the Disciplinary Dept, fraught with conflicts shields him by writing
exculpatory letters on his behalf????

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary.

Complaint against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel.

Case No. 2003.0531 Kenneth Rubenstein & Proskauer Rose LLP

Supreme Court of New York - Appellate Division First Department - Justices Order Investigation for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety. Unanimous Vote

Thomas Cahill, removed from case for conflict & appearance of impropriety, under special inquiry investigation and cases moved to another venue also found to be acting in conflict

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

See Notes for Krane First Dept investigation

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Complaint against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel.

Case No. T-1688-04 - Kenneth Rubenstein & Proskauer Rose LLP

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary.

Failed to complete First Dept. court ordered investigation. Waiting for conflict free forum to press for full investigation as ordered.

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel

James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of the Court

A. Gail Prudenti, Presiding Justice

Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman, State of New York Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts:

See Notes for Krane Second Dept investigation

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Complaint against Raymond Joao, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel

Case No. Unknown Number -

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary.

Failed to complete First Dept. court ordered investigation. Waiting for conflict free forum to press for full investigation as ordered.

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Initially filed with Second Dept but case mysteriously transfers to First Dept with Rubenstein. Then the case is retransferred again to Second Dept with Rubenstein and Krane after discovery of conflicts and violations of New York Supreme Court - First Dept. - Disciplinary Dept.

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary. Thomas Cahill, removed from case for conflict & appearance of impropriety, under special inquiry investigation

Complaint against Raymond Joao, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel.

Case No. 2003-0352 - Raymond Joao, Proskauer & MLGWS

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary. Thomas Cahill, removed from case for conflict & appearance of impropriety, under special inquiry investigation

Supreme Court of New York - Appellate Division First Department - Justices Order Investigation for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety. Unanimous Vote

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Transferred back to Second Department for conflict and appearance of impropriety. See Krane First Dept notes

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Complaint against Raymond A. Joao, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel.

Case No. T-1690-04 - Raymond Joao, Proskauer & MLGWS

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary.

Failed to complete First Dept. court ordered investigation. Waiting for conflict free forum to press for full investigation as ordered.

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

See Notes for Krane Second Dept investigation

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division First Department - Departmental Disciplinary. Thomas Cahill, removed from case for conflict & appearance of impropriety, under special inquiry investigation

Complaint against Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel First Department Departmental Disciplinary

Special Inquiry No. 2004.1122

Ongoing - Transferred to special investigator Martin Gold from First Dept. Chairman investigation for conflict and violations of public office

Ongoing Formal Investigation

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel First Department Disciplinary

Martin Gold, Mr. Gold is a senior member of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, First Judicial Department, appointed by, and responsible to, the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, for the discipline of attorneys.

Ongoing. Cahill charged with aiding and abetting Krane, Rubenstein & Joao and attempting to cover up conflicts and violations of public office with Krane.

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary Committee

Complaint against Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel, Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee

CASE NO. Kearse refuses to docket her own complaint, Lawrence DiGiovanna refuses and complaint is filed against him.

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary.

Waiting to have complaint filed and docketed according to law in a non-conflicted third party venue

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Kearse refused docketing a formal written complaint against herself filed with her at her request for failure to follow a court order and conflicts - Kearse handled this herself and with such complaint filed, continued to act without disclosure despite admitted conflicts and a complaint filed against her

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary

Complaint against Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman, Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee

Complaint refused formal docketing and disposition by Kearse and Prudenti

New York Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department - Departmental Disciplinary.

Waiting to have complaint filed and docketed according to law in a non-conflicted third party venue

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Kearse refused docketing a formal written complaint against DiGiovanna sent to her at her request for failure to obey a court order

Florida Supreme Court

Case No. SC04-1078 Eliot Bernstein v. The Florida Bar - Petition to investigate Florida Bar complaints due to conflicts of interest and public office violations of Supreme Court Florida Bar Officers

Justices
Wells
Anstead
Lewis
Quince
Bell
JJ

Denied

Conflict, Denial of Due Process & Violations of Public Office

Justices
Wells
Anstead
Lewis
Quince
Bell
JJ

Conflict may be found in this case after reviewing that the Solicitor General of the Florida Supreme Court during the time of the Iviewit complaint was suddenly a Foley and Lardner partner, Christopher Kise. Kise recently was promoted to a specially created public office position in Governor of Florida, Charlie Cris' office. Foley and Lardner also represented the Governor of Florida. Foley opens offices in Florida after learning of pending complaints in that state against Proksauer and Foley partners.

Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court refuse formal and procedural docketing of complaints against officers with affirmed violations of public office, inapposite of the Florida and United States constitutions, new complaints will be filed to investigate if Florida Solicitor General office was influential in the decisions surrounding the Iviewit matters. As the Iviewit matters were matters that were of public officials within the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court it would be argued that those charges would have had to been prosecuted from that office before the Supreme Court on behalf of the state's claims.

Despite public office violations confirmed by The Florida Bar against officers, Florida Supreme
Court refuses to prosecute and moves to destroy records opposite Florida record retention laws,
attempts to destroy evidence of the conflicts and public office violations.

Conflicts discovered elevate to Florida Bar President, Kelly Overstreet Johnson, found handling
complaints against Christopher C. Wheeler (convicted of a Felony DUI with injury), while working
as a lawyer under James Wheeler, Christopher Wheeler's brother, at a Florida law firm,
without prior disclosure.

Florida Bar Counsel, John Anthony Boggs, attempts to dismiss attorney conflicts and violation of public
offices by citing legislation he was proposing, instead of the law.

Supreme Court orders destruction of files inapposite of their own Record Retention policies
in efforts to cover up the conflicts and violations of public offices

Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar

Case against Christopher C. Wheeler Case No. 2003-51 109 15C. Represented by Proskauer partner Matthew Triggs in violation of his public office rules with the Supreme Court Florida Bar

Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar

Conflicts and Appearance of Impropriety Discovered. Case elevated to the Florida Supreme Court and then the United States Supreme Court - Wheeler gets arrested for felony DUI w/ Injury

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Kelly Overstreet Johnson, President, Florida Bar

Lorraine Christine Hoffmann, Bar Counsel

Eric Montel Turner, Chief Branch Discipline Counsel

John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel

Matthew Triggs, Proskauer Partner, Florida Supreme Court The Florida Bar Officer

Kenneth L. Marvin, Director of Lawyer Regulation

Joy A. Bartmon, Grievance Committee

Dismissed upon review without investigation and then re-opened and moved to the Florida Supreme Court upon discovery of conflicts of interest and appearance of impropriey in Matthew Triggs violation of public office in handling Wheeler complaint while in a blackout period precluding handling any matters for the Florida Bar. Without disclosure Triggs handled compaints for Proskauer partner Wheeler while in such blackout period.

Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar

Complaint against Christopher C. Wheeler #2 - Complaint Refused formal docketing and disposition, after conflicts and public office violations were discovered in Wheeler #1?

Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Flabar and FSC refuse docket this formal written complaint where the charges were separate from Wheeler’s first complaint and for additional conflicts, conflicts again confirmed by Flabar in writing

Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar

Complaint against Matthew Triggs, Proskauer Partner & Florida Bar Officer for violating Florida Bar rules and violating Supreme Court Florida Bar office position in representing partner Wheeler in blackout period. Complaint refused docketing by Bar despite their confirmation that Triggs violated his public office conflict rules.

Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Kelly Overstreet Johnson, President, Florida Bar

Lorraine Christine Hoffmann, Bar Counsel

Eric Montel Turner, Chief Branch Discipline Counsel

John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel

Kenneth L. Marvin, Director of Lawyer Regulation

Joy A. Bartmon, Grievance Committee

Flabar and FSC refuse docketing formal written complaints even though they confirm conflicts and violations of public office positions with Flabar. Elevated to the Florida Supreme Court which denied hearing the case. That decision elevated to United States Supreme Court which also denied hearing the case, leaving the Iviewit shareholders with no Court to hear complaints against public officers violating their public offices. No ability to file complaints against public officers who were found violating public offices!!!

Fifteenth Judical District, Florida - Judge Jorge Labarga

Proskauer v. Iviewit

Civil Case No. 502001CA004671XXCDAB

(At time of Iviewit discovering this law suit that management and shareholders were unaware of, it was not known that these were fraudulent companies set up by Proskauer to steal intellectual property.)

Default Judgment against Iviewit for failure to retain replacement counsel

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Judge Jonathan Gerber transferred mysteriously to Judge Jorge Labarga

Matthew Triggs, in representing this case for Proskauer in a civil matter, at the same time he was a Florida Supreme Court Bar Officer who was also representing his partner Wheeler and firm Proskauer in a bar complaint filed by Iviewit, acted in violation of Florida Bar officer rules and Florida Bar conflict rules. Triggs would have been precluded from representing Proskauer in these matters, when these were simulatneously also before the Bar and he was acting as counsel in those matters, illegally. Triggs fails to identify conflicts and appeal to Florida Supreme Court Board for approval and conceals his conflicts instead

Labarga refuses to allow a counter complaint filed by competent counsel for Iviewit showing that attorneys in the billing case have committed crimes against the United States Patent & Trademark Office

Labarga dismisses Iviewit law firms after cancelling a trial date with no notice to Iviewit or either of two law firms handling the case for Iviewit.

Labarga Immediately rules against Iviewit for failure to retain replacement counsel, after dismissing two law firms only days before.

Proskauer v. Iviewit will be appealed when due process and procedure can be insured based on new evidence.

It was unknown at the initial lawsuit, that the companies involved in the lawsuit, although similarly named to Iviewit, were set up fraudulently by former counsel to harbor stolen intellectual properties that were almost identical to the Iviewit intellectual properties

It appears the combination of the bogus involuntary bankruptcy and the bogus lawsuit, were attempts to move the stolen intellectual properties

Judicial Qualifications Commission

Complaint against Judge Jorge Labarga

Case Docket No. 03352

Brooke Kennerly

Dismissed on review. Stated to reopen the case on new evidence, have not filed new yet, based on fraudulent corporations

Judicial Qualifications Commission and where the entire case will be appealed upon assurance of due process in a venue conflict free. Astonishing new evidence shows the original Proskauer instigated law suit and bankruptcy were filed in fraud by Proskauer

Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation

Case Nos. 2004-053428 & 2004-053434 & 2004-053999

Angella Potter

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Eric Hurst, Assistant General Counsel

Angella Potter

Jeffrey Sewell - Investigation Specialist II

Laura Gaffney, Office of the General Counsel

Under review by Inspector General Office of the DBPR

Inspector General - Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation

Inspector General - Carl Cook & Ron Russo

Dismissed

Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office

Carl W. Cook, Director of Investigations

Ron Russo, Inspector General

Elevated to the Florida Chief Inspector General. Conflicts were then discovered at the highest level of the Florida Governors office with Foley and Lardner partners running that office. See complaint for the IG of Florida.

Inspector General State of Florida

Melinda Miguel ~ Chief Inspector General

Dismissed the possible conflicts found with Foley and Lardner and Governor of Florida Offices that is oversight to this department. That may act to preclude Florida investigatory actions on multiple grounds

Possible Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office that may have affected case outcome

Melinda Miguel ~ Chief Inspector General

Dawn E. Case
Director of Investigations
Office of the Chief Inspector General

2007 ~ The Inspector General of Florida was sent the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation dismissed case for review. Upon receipt of dismissal on review, conflicts were discovered with Foley and Lardner implicating control over the Governor’s office of Florida. Specifically, Foley and Lardner, once chaired by Michael Grebe, is found to have made partner, Christopher Kise, former Solicitor General of Florida Supreme Court a special post in the Governor’s office as Senior Counsel to Governor. Foley has represented the Governor via Kise in the Florida School Voucher case.

2007 – Upon discovery of conflicts, IG refers us to Judiciary Committee and others to investigate but fails to take actions to instigate investigations of corruption in the highest offices of the State??? Complaints will shortly be filed in all recommended venues.

Pennsylvania Bar

No docket # - Krishna Narine

Pennsylvania Bar

Case to be refiled on new information

Paul Burgoye, Deputy Chief Disciplinary Counsel
The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Dismissed without investigation

Pennsylvania Bar

No docket # Andrew Barroway

Pennsylvania Bar

Case to be refiled on new information

Dismissed without investigation

Virginia State Bar

Case Docket No. 04-888-1004 - William J. Dick & the law firm Foley & Lardenr

Virginia Bar

Case to be refiled on new information

Denial of Due Process

Dismissed without investigation *Where Virginia Bar refuses to advance the complaints in accordance with well established rules or return phone calls regarding this matter. Even after being notified of the conflicts in Florida and New York and perjured statement made Dick to that tribunal and the United States Patent Office in his response. In the Iviewit rebuttal to the response, evidence of the perjuries were presented. Also based on an intellectual property docket submitted by Dick on behalf of Foley & Lardner to that tribunal, upon review of the IP docket, Moatz of the USPTO-OED noted that certain information regarding the owners of those patents was false. This led to suspension of certain of the iviewit intellectual properties at the USPTO.

Institute of Professional Representatives Before the European Patent Office (epi)

Complaint against Martyn Molyneaux and law firms Harrison Goddard and Foote and Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon

Chris Mercer, President, epi & Walter Holzer, European Patent Attorney, former President epi,

Ongoing Formal Investigation

2007 – EPI sent documents sent from EPO that had clear evidence of fraud and requested that we contact FBI to contact Interpol to begin investigation on multiple continents.

Complaints on file with the Institute of Professional Representatives Before the European Patent Office. Requests for investigation of Chris Mercer - President although investigation has been formally begun by that office

European Patent Office

Complaint against Martyn Molyneaux and law firms Harrison Goddard and Foote and Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon

Alain Pompidou, President

Lise Dybdahl, Counsel

Ongoing

Denial of Due Process, Violation of Public Office

Alain Pompidou, President

Lise Dybdahl, Counsel

Wim Van Der Eijk, Principle Director Int'l Affairs and Legal & Patent Law

2007- In responding to EPI document request EPO sent over documents that were clearly frauds and had been changed on Office Actions Iviewit had submitted. This led to a second request to have FBI contact Interpol to co-investigate.

Complaints on file with the European Patent Office & Against Patent Attorney's Licensed with that Institution, Martyn Molyneaux and his firms being the main accused. Complaints on file against Molyneaux and all culpable law firms involved in filing the fraudulent applications in Europe. Requests for oversight at EPO. EPO and EPI have recommended contacting the FBI to contact Interpol to investigate.

Japanese Patent Office

Ongoing

Complaints on file against accused.

Scotland Yard / Metropolitan Police

Complaint against Martyn Molyneaux and law firms Harrison Goddard and Foote and Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon

CR01-8c94d132

Scotland Yard / Metro Police

Ongoing 2007

Complaints on file against accused.

County/Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, Florida

Case No. 502005CC007455XXXXMB Div RB

Judge Laura S. Johnson

Case Voluntarily Withdrawn by opposing party as fraudulent documents were submitted to Judge

Denial of Due Process

Donna Barfield, Esq.

Judge Laura S. Johnson

County/Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, Florida

Case No. 502005CC011311xxxxmb Div RF & Case in Error No. 502005CC007189XXXXMB Div RF

Judge Joseph Marx, recused himself for conflicts after he ruled on set of fraudulent documents.

Immediately thereafter replaced by Judge Nancy Perez

Case Settled on Fraudulent Settlement Papers Submitted by Attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendant. Judge acknowledges fraudulent documents but states those matters must be taken up with criminal authorities?

Conflict, Denial of Due Process & Violation of Public Office

Judge Joseph Marx

Judge Nancy Perez

Attorney Kenneth J. Lowenhaupt / Law Offices of Lowenhaupt & Sawyers

Attorney Mark Wilensky / Dubiner & Wilensky LLC

Attorney Richard Tendler, P.A.

Case relates to Iviewit in that eviction was based on false and fraudulent information tendered to the courts by attorneys acting in violation of their bar rules and executing falsified documents to the courts. This case was withdrawn for there was no case as it was discovered the documents submitted had been forged. Action was not taken by the Judge to notify criminal authorities. The case was an attempt to evict the Bernstein's, while bombing their car, to force them to flee the state of Florida where they were accusing Supreme Court of Florida Justices and Florida Bar employees of crimes involving public office corruptions. In this second attempt to illegally evict Bernstein's a mass of fraudulent documents were tendered to the court, the judge recused immediately after ruling on a document he knew was fraudulently created by Plaintiff and Defendant counsel working to procure fraudulent documents to effecuate eviction.

This case while appearing on the surface to be an eviction action, when the documents are analyzed it will be evidenced that the Bernstein's were pursuing their tenant rights when three investigatory bodies of Florida (The Department of Business and
Professional Regulation,
Code Enforcement for the city of Boynton Beach and the Florida Health Department) had issued warning to the landlord for
toxic black mold found at the unit and all units within the complex. This mold issue was causing Bernstein's infant son to vomit blood
and severly malformed his wife's hands and was causing a mass of ailments to many residents.

Despite this fact, once lawyers and judges were involved, the rights of Bernstein's were severly limited and they were forced to
stay in a unit that Dr's had ordered the infant removed from. This put the Bernstein's infant son in a situation where permanent
lung and brain damage may have resulted. Due to the Denial of Due Process and conflicts found in these matters,
the Bernstein's were finally forced from their home, forced to leave their family's worldly possessions behind and move from the state.

It became obvious with the bombing of their car, the denial of rights to protect their son in courts in Florida that the Bernstein's
due to their case in the Florida Supreme Court of Bernstein v. The Florida Bar could not even ascertain counsel that worked
on their behalf, in fact their counsel was found colluding with the Plaintiff's counsel, who was found colluding with the
Judge, imparted the appearance that because of the nature of their complaint against the legal community the Bernstein's
could find no venue for fair and impartial due process, even where an infant's life was in imminent danger.

West Palm Beach, Florida Police Dept

Complaint against investigating officers for failure to follow due process and procedure

Case #05-26457

Captain Anderson ~ Commander of the Internal Affairs Unit & Lieutenant Reed ~ Criminal Investigation Unit

Ongoing 2006

2007 Red Bluff California Police Department & Others

Relative to Eliot Bernstein, Lucas Simpson Stabbing

Reported to Glenn Fine, Inspector General, Department of Justice. Despite a large crowd of witnesses, the primary subject has not been charged with the stabbing even while being detained on other charges.

Red Bluff California Superior Court, County of Tehama, Civil Division

Case #14561 in the Superior Court of California, County of Tehama, Civil Division,

Judge John J. Garaventa

Denial of Due Process forcing eviction

Judge John J. Garaventa, Dennis Albright, Esq. & Christopher Dittner

See case and related California case of the stabbing of Lucas Simpson.