#	Department Filed With	Complaint	Filed With	Filed Date	Conflict/Public Office Violation or Denial of Due Process	Officials Involved	Case Notes
1	House & Senate Judiciary Committee’s	John Dingell, Chairman of the House Energy & Commerce Committee forwards Iviewit former CEO, P. Stephen Lamont's complaint  to Nita Lowey to the Judiciary Committee for investigation.	House Judiciary Committee by The Honorable John Dingell to Sampak Garg & Shauna Winters	Introduced January 2007			P. Stephen Lamont, former Iviewit CEO, files complaint with Nita Lowey regarding his personal interests in the Iviewit companies and informs her of crimes against the United States Patent & Trademark Office, other United States agencies and international crimes against foreign nations. Lowey passes the information to John Dingell, House Energy and Commerce Committee Dingell forwards complaint to Sam Garg, House Judiciary Committee Inventor Eliot I. Bernstein petitions Hon. Senator Dianne Feinstein of the Senate Judiciary Committee on behalf of inventor protections under Article 1, Sec. 8, Clause 8.
	House Energy & Commerce Committee	Nita Lowey forwards complaint of P. Stephen Lamont, former Iviewit CEO, to the Energy & Commerce Committee for investigation	Representative John Dingell	2007			Dingell forwards complaint to House Judiciary Committeee.
2	The Honorable Senator Dianne Feinstein	Appeal for Congress to intervene on behalf of inventor Bernstein under (i) Article 1, Section 8, Clause 8 inventor protections (ii) Due Process & Procedure (iii) Civil Right to Life and (iv) notify Congress of crimes directly against the United States.  Language is also sent to ammend the Patent Act with a proposed bill to protect the intellectual properties while investigations are ongoing	The Honorable Senator Dianne Feinstein	2006-2007			Feinstein office to contact various agencies to gather status of cases.  Waiting for response from office concerning the best places to take the complaint filed within Congress.  Petition to Feinstein asks for Government oversight as criminals have violated public offices of a multiplicity of government agencies in attempts to defraud inventors’ of inventions.  Criminals have also committed hosts of crimes against the government and the petition calls for the government to begin investigating and prosecuting crimes against the United States Call for government to be accountable for all investigations that have been found fraught with conflicts.  Call for Congress to enact legislation that suspends patents indefinitely while investigations are ongoing to protect patents from loss in opposite of the Constitution.  Call for Congress to enact protections for inventors and others lives, after car bombing.  Alert of potential Patentgate
3	Department of Justice – Office of Inspector General	Referred by FBI to investigate missing case files and investigators at the West Palm Beach Florida FBI offices and the United States Attorney for Southern District of Florida.	The Honorable Glenn Fine	2007			In progress, DOJ OIG has referred the matters to the FBI OPR to formally begin investigation.
4	Federal Bureau of Investigation – Office of Professional Responsibility	Directed to FBI OPR to investigate missing Iviewit case file from FBI & US Attorney Office Southern District Florida	H. Marshall Jarrett	June 2007 formal written complaint			2007 FBI OPR refuses to allow Iviewit to talk to anyone in their offices, despite referral by the Department of Justice  Inspector General and by referral from the FBI West Palm Beach, FL.  Directing formal written complaint for immediate investigation of FBI West Palm Beach and US Attorney Offices.  Iviewit files formal written request for investigation.
	New York State Commission of Investigation	Complaint outlines Denial of Due Process in the New York Courts and Investigatory Bodies, including conflicts found with officer of the New York Supreme Court	Jody Pugach, Special Investigator	July 2007 Formal Complaint filed
5	Federal Bureau of Investigation	Written Statement with evidence and witnesses. Personal interviews by Lucchesi and others with Eliot I. Bernstein, Mark Gaffney, Esq. & P. Stephen Lamont	Special Agent Stephen Luchessi - West Palm Beach FBI by Iviewit Management and Shareholders	Formal Investigation - Ongoing Since 2000	Denial of Due Process	Stephen Lucchesi	2007 FBI directs Iviewit to the FBI Office of Professional Responsibility and the Department of Justice – Office of Inspector General to investigate possible corruption within the FBI and the US Attorney Office as no file information exists. 2007 FBI states that Lucchesi has retired with the case file and no one has any information regarding Iviewit.  Case file lost. 2005 Luchessi confirms contact with Moatz to formally investigate federal crimes against the USPTO and Commerce Department. 2004 - 2005 Luchessi states he has taken complaints to US Attorney for Southern District of Florida for formal review and prosecution. 2002-2003 Original Evidence, CD’s with documentation, taped calls, witness lists and sworn statements delivered to Lucchesi.  Meetings with Eliot Bernstein, P. Stephen Lamont and Mark Gaffney, Esq. with Lucchesi and other FBI agents specializing in crimes committed by law firms. 2000-2001 FBI initially notified in the Long Beach, CA office that death threats had been made against inventor Bernstein and that Harry Moatz of the patent office had been apprised of possible fraud against the USPTO.  Formal complaints of the death threats were filed with the Rancho Palos Verdes, CA local PD offices
6	FBI/Boynton Beach Fire Dept & The Florida Fire Marshall	Car Bomb planted in inventor Eliot I. Bernstein's family mini-van only hours before they were to pick the car up from a several month servicing.  The car had been vandalized and robbed prior to being taken to the shop where the bomb was planted.  http://www.iviewit.tv/Image Gallery/auto/1.htm	FBI, Special Agent ~ Stephen Luchessi & Boynton Beach Fire Investigator Rick Lee/The Florida Fire Marshall	Formal Investigation - Ongoing Since 2005 -	Denial of Due Process	Special Agent, Stephen Lucchesi, West Palm Beach FBI Fire Investigator, Rick Lee, Boynton Beach Florida Fire Department State of Florida Fire Marshall	2007 04 Update - FBI states they have lost case files and Lucchesi has retired with all information.  Directed Iviewit to have FBI OPR investigate the who, what and why.  Missing entire files, notes, original evidence presented, etc.  Glenn Fine, Inspector General of The Dept of Justice office, directs Iviewit to DOJ - Office of Professional Responsibility Status of investigation unknown after referring Rick Lee to Lucchesi at FBI.  No protections instituted for inventor Bernstein or his family, despite the attempt and threats on their lives.  Fire investigator Rick Lee determines that accelerants were used and that the act was intentional not accidental.  Lee states that an officer was there at scene minutes after the explosion and videotaped the entire event of all four cars being destroyed. Bernstein's are forced to flee Florida again for their lives.  The first time the Bernstein’s were forced to flee their Florida residence was in 2001 after Brian G. Utley threatened the life on inventor Bernstein if he exposed the crimes initially exposed by Arthur Andersen and others.  Images @ http://www.iviewit.tv  and http://www.iviewit.tv/Image Gallery/auto/1.htm ***Car originally was taken to auto body shop for battery replacement, while the car was there, it was broken into and all wiring stripped as if someone were removing listening devices planted in car.  Investigators stated the stereo was stolen and tv but pictures of the car after the fact, show the stereo and tv in place.  The car was then moved to another auto body shop as it also looked like it had been rolled on its side.  At the second auto body shop, after months, the car was deemed ready to pick up the following day at 11am.  At 2am the car blew up.
7	U.S. Attorney, Southern District Florida	Case brought by FBI, Special Agent, Luchessi	UNKNOWN -	Formal Investigation - Ongoing since 2004	Denial of Due Process	Case Agent is unknown as it appears no documents exist between the FBI and US attorney regarding Iviewit	2007 – US Attorney Office has no records of the Iviewit case or any determinations that may have been made.  The missing case from the FBI, along with the missing case at the US Attorney leads to FBI OPR and DOJ OIG investigations of possible internal corruption.  Iviewit requests of FBI OPR to investigate where and who handled the Iviewit case for the FBI and who is responsible for missing case files 2004-2007 Unknown status of investigation
8	United States Patent & Trademark Office	Petition for Change of Inventors based on charges of fraud on the United States	Jon W. Dudas ~ Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office on advisement of Harry I. Moatz, USPTO-OED Director  Inventors & Investor Crossbow Ventures / Small Business Administration filed complaint	Formal Investigation - Ongoing Since 2003	Denial of Due Process	Jon W. Dudas, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the United States Patent and Trademark Office John J. Doll, Commissioner for Patents & Trademark Mindy Fleisher, Chief of Staff - Office of Commissioner of Patents Ira Lazarus, Supervisory Petition Office	Investigation has led to suspensions of patent applications by the Commissioner pending investigation outcome Petition for continued suspension by inventors is granted by the Commissioners’ office pending investigation into the alleged patent crimes and then requests for continued suspensions are entirely ignored failing to ensure due process and procedure Investigation may cause loss of inventor rights as current law is not in place for issues where patent bar members have committed fraud against the United States and USPTO and investigations take longer than current suspension laws allow for.  Congress is petitioned via Dianne Feinstein, by inventor Eliot I. Bernstein for changes to legislation to protect inventor rights. Moatz  advises inventors to call upon Congress to intercede where inventors, owners and assignees on intellectual properties have been falsified, to pursue having the intellectual properties corrected and returned to the true and proper inventors  The inventors are unable to make changes or gain information where they are not listed on the patents under current law.  Federal criminal actions must be first tried to return the stolen properties before Iviewit and Inventors can make changes and claim ownership. Commissioner of Patents apprised of OED investigations into approximately nine lawyers and law firms
9	United States Patent & Trademark Office ~ Office of Enrollment & Discipline	Formal complaints filed with evidence and witnesses provided.  Formal investigation of allegations of fraud on the USPTO by registered members of the federal Patent Bar	Director, Harry I. Moatz by Eliot I. Bernstein & P. Stephen Lamont	Formal Investigation - Ongoing Since 1999			Formal investigation of law firms and patent attorneys      Proskauer Rose (Kenneth Rubenstein, Raymond Joao, others)      Foley & Lardner (William J. Dick, Steven Becker & Douglas Bohem      Blakely, Sokoloff, Taylor & Zafman (Norman Zafman, Thomas Coester, others)      Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe & Schlissel (Raymond Joao, others)      Schiffrin & Barroway (Andrew Barroway, Krishna Narine, others) Per Moatz, he has begun formal investigation with Special Agent Stephen Luchessi of the FBI concerning the federal crimes committed against the USPTO and United States by the aforementioned law firms and lawyers Moatz designs patent office team to get inventions suspended at USPTO and directs inventors to file fraud upon the USPTO Moatz advises inventors to seek congressional intervention regarding a variety of patent issues Patents are found in former management Brian Utley’s name, patents end up in fraudulent companies and some patents are entirely listed under names that USPTO cannot disclose under privacy laws.  Moatz suggests to contact Congress for an Act of Congress to release the information to the true and proper inventors Patents, 90 patents, are found in former patent counsel Raymond Joao’s name
10	United States Supreme Court	Case No. 05-6611 Eliot I. Bernstein v. The Florida Bar - Certiorari of Florida Supreme Court Case SC-1078	• Justices  ?  ?  ?  ?  ?  ? Do not know which Justices reviewed and denied this.  Sandra Day Oconner?	Denied.  Although United States Solicitor General was invited to undertake the crimes alleged against the United States, no response to court or Bernstein was ever tendered in response prior to the Supreme Court denying hearing the case.	Denial of Due Process	Don't know who decided this or how.  Supreme Court states this is not public information.	Court denied hearing of case, precluding Iviewit shareholders from advancing claims against attorney's caught violating Supreme Court of Florida public offices.  Denying the case set a "Catch 22" whereby citizens were precluded rights to have formal docketing of complaints against public officials and with no state or federal forum to file against them.
11	United States Bankrupty Court Southern District of Florida	Case No. 01-33407-BKC-SHF- Intel (RYJO), Brian Utley, Raymond Hersh and Michael Reale file involuntary bankruptcy against Iviewit.com LLC	U.S. Bankruptcy Court Southern District of Florida Judge unknown	Case dropped upon Iviewit retaining counsel to replace counsel that was prior unknown, acting on the companies behalf.  Case will be appealed based upon startling new evidence, once due process can be assured in a conflict free forum.	Case filed illegally by Proskauer Rose Management (Brian Utley, Michael Real & Raymond Hersh)  and Strategic Partner Real 3D (Intel, Silicon Graphics Inc. & Lockheed Martin.  Company that involuntary was filed on was illegally set up to steal Iviewit intellectual properties	Don’t have information on the ruling judge in the matter.	Iviewit was notified by investors in 2001 while doing a Private Placement with Wachovia that they were in a law suit with Proskauer Rose and an involuntary bankruptcy with Intel and former management.  Iviewit retained legal counsel to investigate how these legal actions could be instigated without shareholder or management consent.  It was later learned that stolen intellectual properties were being funneled into companies set up by former counsel whereby the attorneys were the shareholders of the similar and identically named companies to the Iviewit companies.  A sophisticated shell game of corporations and intellectual properties in attempt to defraud the United States, the inventors and shareholders.  In so designing this artifice to defraud, applications in false inventors names for the Iviewit inventions was then filed fraudulently in violation of federal code and finally further filed in over thirty countries in violation of international treatises.
12	AICPA	Case No. TNS 2004-038 - Written Statement with evidence and witnesses that Gerald Lewin had violated ethical codes of conduct	Elizabeth Boltz, CPA originally started investigation.  New investigator replaced her and dismissed the case due to too busy?	Deferred to Florida Department of Professional Regulation after two years whereby investigation was underway and then new investigator stated the department did not have the resources to investigate further.	Denial of Due Process	Elizabeth Boltz	The AICPA was apprised that crimes had been committed against the federal Small Business Administration and other United States departments and started an investigation.  A new investigator took over the case and stated the AICPA was to busy to further investigate and to contact Florida State authorities?  Despite overwhelming evidence that the accountant, Gerald Lewin and his daughter Erika were part of misleading Arthur Andersen auditors, were involved in crimes against the United States and were under investigation, the claim was that they had no resources to investigate.
13	Boca Raton, Florida Police Complaint 1	Case No. 2001-054580 Embezzlement/Theft of Proprietary Equipment	J. Ulloa by William Kasser	6/20/2001Brian G. Utley & Michael Reale found in possession of stolen proprietary equipment and forced to return stolen property by Boca PD.	Denial of Due Process, Violation of Public Office	J. Ulloa	Upon requests to re-open the case due to further evidence submissions entailing more criminal activities, including fraud on the United States, Detective Robert Flechaus stated he began new investigations with the SEC.  The SEC denied ever being involved, information forwarded to FBI.
14	Boca Raton, Florida Police Complaint 1	Case # Stolen SBA and Corporate Funds over $1,000,000 including SBA funds	Detective Robert Flechaus - Removed from case for internal affairs review	Ongoing	Denial of Due Process, Violation of Public Office	Detective, Robert Flechaus, Boca Raton PD Chief of Police, Andrew Scott, Boca Raton, PD Assistant Chief, James Burke Internal Affairs	Case is under investigation and internal review by Chief Andrew Scott of the Boca Raton PD
15	Boca Raton, Florida Police Complaint 2	Case #  - Stolen Patents and Crimes Against the USPTO & SBA	Detective Robert Flechaus - Removed from case for internal affairs review.	Ongoing	Denial of Due Process, Violation of Public Office	Detective, Robert Flechaus, Boca Raton PD Chief of Police, Andrew Scott, Boca Raton, PD Assistant Chief, James Burke Internal Affairs	Case is under investigation and internal review by Chief Andrew Scott of the Boca Raton PD
16	Boca Raton Police Internal Affairs Investigation	Case #Unknown	Chief Andrew Scott	Ongoing	Denial of Due Process, Violation of Public Office	Chief of Police, Andrew Scott, Boca Raton, PD Internal Affairs	Case is under investigation and internal review by Chief Andrew Scott of the Boca Raton PD
			Securities & Exchange Commission			William Riley Doreen Mosemer	Boca Raton PD gave Iviewit names of investigators for the SEC who had never heard of the Iviewit matters and had never been invited to meetings the Boca PD claimed they were to attend.  Iviewit asked investigators to begin investigations of the Iviewit and Boca PD matters
17	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  First Department  - Departmental Disciplinary	Petition for Investigation of Steven Krane, Kenneth Rubenstein and Raymond Joao for conflict of interest, appearance of impropriety and crimes against the United States	First Dept Justices: Angela M. Mazzarelli, Richard T. Andrias, David B. Saxe, David Friedman & Lewis A. Gonzalez	By unanimous vote -Order for Formal Investigation & Disposition of Conflicts and Appearance of Impropriety - Unpublished Orders M3198 - Steven C. Krane / M2820 Kenneth Rubenstein and M3212 Raymond A. Joao	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	First Dept Justices: Angela M. Mazzarelli, Richard T. Andrias, David B. Saxe, David Friedman & Lewis A. Gonzalez	Court order for investigation never completed.  Waiting for new forum that is conflict free to file for enforcement of court order. Court fails to enforce court ordered investigations
18	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  First Department  - Departmental Disciplinary	Complaint against Steven C. Krane, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel. Complaint No. 2004.1883 Steven C. Krane, Esq. - Proskauer Rose LLP Intellectual Property Partner - Former President NYSBA & Officer First Dept	Thomas Cahill, removed from case for conflict & appearance of impropriety, under special inquiry investigation	Supreme Court of New York - Appellate Division First Department - Justices Order Investigation for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety.  Unanimous Vote	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel, First Dept Departmental Disciplinary Committee Steven C. Krane, Officer Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Former President of New York State Bar.  His one year blackout from involvement in any bar case is violated, along with multiple other conflicts and violations of public office.  Krane fails to disclose conflicts with multiple conflicting public offices he maintains in the New York Courts and Disciplinary Departments, prior to representing his Proskauer partners and himself. Judith Kaye, Married to Proskauer Intellectual propety partner Stephen Kaye and where Krane formerly was her clerk.  Information was transmitted to her offices and buried and no conflict was admitted until later discovered. Joseph Wigley, Bar Counsel	Cases transferred for formal investigation, after review and deliberation of conflicts and appearance of impropriety by five justices of the New York First Department Case originally dismissed upon review without investigation due to conflicts found in Steven Krane handling of complaints in violation of public office almost two years after it had begun. Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel, First Department now under special inquiry investigation for his part in aiding and abetting Krane, Rubenstein & Joao Cahill upon request of Moatz of the USPTO-OED to contact him would not contact Moatz to enjoin investigations and prior to the federal OED investigation being completed tried to dismiss the cases without any formal investigation.  At that time it was unknown that Krane was a leading disciplinary committee member with multiple roles at the First Dept. while handling complaints against his partners and then himself Krane writes response to his own complaint denying roles at the First Dept. Iviewit then finds from Clerk of the Court that Krane has departmental roles and should not be handling his own complaint at the department
19	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  Second Department  - Departmental Disciplinary	Complaint against Steven C. Krane, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel. Case No. T-1689-04 Steven C. Krane, Esq. - Proskauer Rose LLP Intellectual Property Partner - Former President NYSBA & Member First Dept	Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel  - CONFLICTS ADMITTED WITH ACCUSED STEVEN KRANE	Failed to complete First Dept. court ordered investigation.  Waiting for conflict free forum to press for full investigation as ordered.	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel, Second Dept Departmental Disciplinary Committee James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of the Court, Second Department A. Gail Prudenti, Presiding Justice, Second Department Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman, State of New York Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts:	Further conflicts and violations of public offices were found and the Court Ordered Investigations by the First Department were never formally completed Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel , Second Dept DDC, writes Iviewit that cases were dismissed without investigation.  No witnesses provided were called, no evidence tested and she claims she is not under the jurisdiction of the First Dept and therefore does not have to investigate under the court order Kearse fails to respond to the First Dept with her decisions and instead attempts to dismiss the case through contacting Iviewit who did not order the investigation Kearse admits conflicts with both Krane and Chief Judge of New York, Judith Kaye.  Kearse fails to disclose conflicts prior to handling the complaints Kearse refuses to docket formally complaints against herself and Lawrence DiGiovanni, Chairman of the Second Dept DDC Clerk of the Court, Pelzer (with no authority under the Disciplinary Dept., attempts to write letter stating that Krane did no wrong, Krane puts forth no statement to the Court ordered investigation as the Disciplinary Dept, fraught with conflicts shields him by writing exculpatory letters on his behalf????
20	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  First Department  - Departmental Disciplinary.	Complaint against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel. Case No. 2003.0531 Kenneth Rubenstein & Proskauer Rose LLP	Supreme Court of New York - Appellate Division First Department - Justices Order Investigation for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety.  Unanimous Vote	Thomas Cahill, removed from case for conflict & appearance of impropriety, under special inquiry investigation and cases moved to another venue also found to be acting in conflict	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel, First Dept Departmental Disciplinary Committee Steven C. Krane, Officer Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Former President of New York State Bar.  His one year blackout from involvement in any bar case is violated, along with multiple other conflicts and violations of public office.  Krane fails to disclose conflicts with multiple conflicting public offices he maintains in the New York Courts and Disciplinary Departments, prior to representing his Proskauer partners and himself. Judith Kaye, Married to Proskauer Intellectual propety partner Stephen Kaye and where Krane formerly was her clerk.  Information was transmitted to her offices and buried and no conflict was admitted until later discovered. Joseph Wigley, Bar Counsel	See Notes for Krane First Dept investigation
21	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  Second Department  - Departmental Disciplinary	Complaint against Kenneth Rubenstein, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel. Case No. T-1688-04 - Kenneth Rubenstein & Proskauer Rose LLP	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  Second Department  - Departmental Disciplinary.	Failed to complete First Dept. court ordered investigation.  Waiting for conflict free forum to press for full investigation as ordered.	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of the Court A. Gail Prudenti, Presiding Justice Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman, State of New York Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts:	See Notes for Krane Second Dept investigation
22	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  Second Department  - Departmental Disciplinary	Complaint against Raymond Joao, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel Case No. Unknown Number -	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  Second Department  - Departmental Disciplinary.	Failed to complete First Dept. court ordered investigation.  Waiting for conflict free forum to press for full investigation as ordered.	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of the Court A. Gail Prudenti, Presiding Justice Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman, State of New York Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts:	Initially filed with Second Dept but case mysteriously transfers to First Dept with Rubenstein.  Then the case is retransferred again to Second Dept with Rubenstein and Krane after discovery of conflicts and violations of New York Supreme Court - First Dept. - Disciplinary Dept.
23	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  First Department  - Departmental Disciplinary.  Thomas Cahill, removed from case for conflict & appearance of impropriety, under special inquiry investigation	Complaint against Raymond Joao, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel.  Case No. 2003-0352 - Raymond Joao, Proskauer & MLGWS	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  First Department  - Departmental Disciplinary.  Thomas Cahill, removed from case for conflict & appearance of impropriety, under special inquiry investigation	Supreme Court of New York - Appellate Division First Department - Justices Order Investigation for Conflicts and the Appearance of Impropriety.  Unanimous Vote	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel, First Dept Departmental Disciplinary Committee Steven C. Krane, Officer Departmental Disciplinary Committee, Former President of New York State Bar.  His one year blackout from involvement in any bar case is violated, along with multiple other conflicts and violations of public office.  Krane fails to disclose conflicts with multiple conflicting public offices he maintains in the New York Courts and Disciplinary Departments, prior to representing his Proskauer partners and himself. Judith Kaye, Married to Proskauer Intellectual propety partner Stephen Kaye and where Krane formerly was her clerk.  Information was transmitted to her offices and buried and no conflict was admitted until later discovered. Joseph Wigley, Bar Counsel	Transferred back to Second Department for conflict and appearance of impropriety.  See Krane First Dept notes
24	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  Second Department  - Departmental Disciplinary	Complaint against Raymond A. Joao, Proskauer & Meltzer Lippe Goldstein Wolfe and Schlisshel. Case No. T-1690-04 - Raymond Joao, Proskauer & MLGWS	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  Second Department  - Departmental Disciplinary.	Failed to complete First Dept. court ordered investigation.  Waiting for conflict free forum to press for full investigation as ordered.	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of the Court A. Gail Prudenti, Presiding Justice Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman, State of New York Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts:	See Notes for Krane Second Dept investigation
25	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  First Department  - Departmental Disciplinary.  Thomas Cahill, removed from case for conflict & appearance of impropriety, under special inquiry investigation	Complaint against Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel First Department Departmental Disciplinary Special Inquiry No. 2004.1122	Ongoing - Transferred to special investigator Martin Gold from First Dept. Chairman investigation for conflict and violations of public office	Ongoing Formal Investigation	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Thomas Cahill, Chief Counsel First Department Disciplinary Martin Gold, Mr. Gold is a senior member of the Departmental Disciplinary Committee, First Judicial Department, appointed by, and responsible to, the Appellate Division, First Judicial Department, for the discipline of attorneys.	Ongoing. Cahill charged with aiding and abetting Krane, Rubenstein & Joao and attempting to cover up conflicts and violations of public office with Krane.
26	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  Second Department  - Departmental Disciplinary Committee	Complaint against Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel, Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee CASE NO. Kearse refuses to docket her own complaint, Lawrence DiGiovanna refuses and complaint is filed against him.	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  Second Department  - Departmental Disciplinary.	Waiting to have complaint filed and docketed according to law in a non-conflicted third party venue	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of the Court A. Gail Prudenti, Presiding Justice Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman, State of New York Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts:	Kearse refused docketing a formal written complaint against herself filed with her at her request for failure to follow a court order and conflicts - Kearse handled this herself and with such complaint filed, continued to act without disclosure despite admitted conflicts and a complaint filed against her
27	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  Second Department  - Departmental Disciplinary	Complaint against Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman, Second Department Departmental Disciplinary Committee Complaint refused formal docketing and disposition by Kearse and Prudenti	New York Supreme Court Appellate Division  Second Department  - Departmental Disciplinary.	Waiting to have complaint filed and docketed according to law in a non-conflicted third party venue	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Diana Maxfield Kearse, Chief Counsel James Edward Pelzer, Clerk of the Court A. Gail Prudenti, Presiding Justice Lawrence DiGiovanna, Chairman, State of New York Grievance Committee for the Second and Eleventh Judicial Districts:	Kearse refused docketing a formal written complaint against DiGiovanna sent to her at her request for failure to obey a court order
28	Florida Supreme Court	Case No. SC04-1078 Eliot Bernstein v. The Florida Bar - Petition to investigate Florida Bar complaints due to conflicts of interest and public office violations of Supreme Court Florida Bar Officers	Justices   Wells   Anstead   Lewis   Quince   Bell   JJ	Denied	Conflict, Denial of Due Process & Violations of Public Office	Justices   Wells   Anstead   Lewis   Quince   Bell   JJ	Conflict may be found in this case after reviewing that the Solicitor General of the Florida Supreme Court during the time of the Iviewit complaint was suddenly a Foley and Lardner partner, Christopher Kise.  Kise recently was promoted to a specially created public office position in Governor of Florida, Charlie Cris' office.  Foley and Lardner also represented the Governor of Florida.  Foley opens offices in Florida after learning of pending complaints in that state against Proksauer and Foley partners. Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court refuse formal and procedural docketing of complaints against officers with affirmed violations of public office, inapposite of the Florida and United States constitutions, new complaints will be filed to investigate if Florida Solicitor General office was influential in the decisions surrounding the Iviewit matters.  As the Iviewit matters were matters that were of public officials within the Florida Bar and Florida Supreme Court it would be argued that those charges would have had to been prosecuted from that office before the Supreme Court on behalf of the state's claims. Despite public office violations confirmed by The Florida Bar against officers, Florida Supreme Court refuses to prosecute and moves to destroy records opposite Florida record retention laws, attempts to destroy evidence of the conflicts and public office violations. Conflicts discovered elevate to Florida Bar President, Kelly Overstreet Johnson, found handling complaints against Christopher C. Wheeler (convicted of a Felony DUI with injury), while working as a lawyer under James Wheeler, Christopher Wheeler's brother, at a Florida law firm, without prior disclosure. Florida Bar Counsel, John Anthony Boggs, attempts to dismiss attorney conflicts and violation of public offices by citing legislation he was  proposing, instead of the law. Supreme Court orders destruction of files inapposite of their own Record Retention policies  in efforts to cover up the conflicts and violations of public offices
29	Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar	Case against Christopher C. Wheeler Case No. 2003-51 109 15C.  Represented by Proskauer partner Matthew Triggs in violation of his public office rules with the Supreme Court Florida Bar	Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar	Conflicts and Appearance of Impropriety Discovered.  Case elevated to the Florida Supreme Court and then the United States Supreme Court - Wheeler gets arrested for felony DUI w/ Injury	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Kelly Overstreet Johnson, President, Florida Bar Lorraine Christine Hoffmann, Bar Counsel Eric Montel Turner, Chief Branch Discipline Counsel John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel Matthew Triggs, Proskauer Partner, Florida Supreme Court The Florida Bar Officer Kenneth L. Marvin, Director of Lawyer Regulation Joy A. Bartmon, Grievance Committee	Dismissed upon review without investigation and then re-opened and moved to the Florida Supreme Court upon discovery of conflicts of interest and appearance of impropriey in Matthew Triggs violation of public office in handling Wheeler complaint while in a blackout period precluding handling any matters for the Florida Bar.  Without disclosure Triggs handled compaints for Proskauer partner Wheeler while in such blackout period.
30	Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar	Complaint against Christopher C. Wheeler #2 - Complaint Refused formal docketing and disposition, after conflicts and public office violations were discovered in Wheeler #1?	Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar		Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Kelly Overstreet Johnson, President, Florida Bar Lorraine Christine Hoffmann, Bar Counsel Eric Montel Turner, Chief Branch Discipline Counsel John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel Matthew Triggs, Proskauer Partner, Florida Supreme Court The Florida Bar Officer Kenneth L. Marvin, Director of Lawyer Regulation Joy A. Bartmon, Grievance Committee	Flabar and FSC refuse docket this formal written complaint where the charges were separate from Wheeler’s first complaint and for additional conflicts, conflicts again confirmed by Flabar in writing
31	Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar	Complaint against Matthew Triggs, Proskauer Partner & Florida Bar Officer for violating Florida Bar rules and violating Supreme Court Florida Bar office position in representing partner Wheeler in blackout period.  Complaint refused docketing by Bar despite their confirmation that Triggs violated his public office conflict rules.	Florida Supreme Court - The Florida Bar		Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Kelly Overstreet Johnson, President, Florida Bar Lorraine Christine Hoffmann, Bar Counsel Eric Montel Turner, Chief Branch Discipline Counsel John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel Kenneth L. Marvin, Director of Lawyer Regulation Joy A. Bartmon, Grievance Committee	Flabar and FSC refuse docketing formal written complaints even though they confirm conflicts and violations of public office positions with Flabar.  Elevated to the Florida Supreme Court which denied hearing the case.  That decision elevated to United States Supreme Court which also denied hearing the case, leaving the Iviewit shareholders with no Court to hear complaints against public officers violating their public offices. No ability to file complaints against public officers who were found violating public offices!!!
32	Fifteenth Judical District, Florida - Judge Jorge Labarga	Proskauer v. Iviewit Civil Case No. CA 01-04671 AB (At time of Iviewit discovering this law suit that management and shareholders were unaware of, it was not known that these were fraudulent companies set up by Proskauer to steal intellectual property.)		Default Judgment against Iviewit for failure to retain replacement counsel	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Judge Jorge Labarga Matthew Triggs, in representing this case for Proskauer in a civil matter, at the same time he was a Florida Supreme Court Bar Officer who was also representing his partner Wheeler and firm Proskauer in a bar complaint filed by Iviewit, acted in violation of Florida Bar officer rules and Florida Bar conflict rules.  Triggs would have  been precluded from representing Proskauer in these matters, when these were simulatneously also before the Bar and he was acting as counsel in those matters, illegally.  Triggs fails to identify conflicts and appeal to Florida Supreme Court Board for approval and conceals his conflicts instead	Labarga refuses to allow a counter complaint filed by competent counsel for Iviewit showing that attorneys in the billing case have committed crimes against the United States Patent & Trademark Office Labarga dismisses Iviewit law firms after cancelling a trial date with no notice to Iviewit or either of two law firms handling the case for Iviewit.  Labarga Immediately rules against Iviewit for failure to retain replacement counsel, after dismissing two law firms only days before. Proskauer v. Iviewit will be appealed when due process and procedure can be insured based on new evidence.  It was unknown at the initial lawsuit, that the companies involved in the lawsuit, although similarly named to Iviewit, were set up fraudulently by former counsel to harbor stolen intellectual properties that were almost identical to the Iviewit intellectual properties It appears the combination of the bogus involuntary bankruptcy and the bogus lawsuit, were attempts to move the stolen intellectual properties
33	Judicial Qualifications Commission	Complaint against Judge Jorge Labarga Case Docket No. 03352	Brooke Kennerly	Dismissed on review.  Stated to reopen the case on new evidence, have not filed new yet, based on fraudulent corporations			Judicial Qualifications Commission and where the entire case will be appealed upon assurance of due process in a venue conflict free.  Astonishing new evidence shows the original Proskauer instigated law suit and bankruptcy were filed in fraud by Proskauer
34	Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation	Case Nos. 2004-053428 & 2004-053434 & 2004-053999	Angella Potter		Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Eric Hurst, Assistant General Counsel Angella Potter Jeffrey Sewell - Investigation Specialist II Laura Gaffney, Office of the General Counsel	Under review by Inspector General Office of the DBPR
35	Inspector General - Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation		Inspector General - Carl Cook & Ron Russo	Dismissed	Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office	Carl W. Cook, Director of Investigations Ron Russo, Inspector General	Elevated to the Florida Chief Inspector General.  Conflicts were then discovered at the highest level of the Florida Governors office with Foley and Lardner partners running that office. See complaint for the IG of Florida.
36	Inspector General State of Florida	Melinda Miguel ~ Chief Inspector General		Dismissed the possible conflicts found with Foley and Lardner and Governor of Florida Offices that is oversight to this department.  That may act to preclude Florida investigatory actions on multiple grounds	Possible Conflict, Denial of Due Process Violation of Public Office that may have affected case outcome	Melinda Miguel ~ Chief Inspector General Dawn E. Case Director of Investigations Office of the Chief Inspector General	2007 ~ The Inspector General of Florida was sent the Florida Department of Business and Professional Regulation dismissed case for review.  Upon receipt of dismissal on review, conflicts were discovered with Foley and Lardner implicating control over the Governor’s office of Florida.  Specifically, Foley and Lardner, once chaired by Michael Grebe, is found to have made partner, Christopher Kise, former Solicitor General of Florida Supreme Court a special post in the Governor’s office as Senior Counsel to Governor.  Foley has represented the Governor via Kise in the Florida School Voucher case. 2007 – Upon discovery of conflicts, IG refers us to Judiciary Committee and others to investigate but fails to take actions to instigate investigations of corruption in the highest offices of the State???  Complaints will shortly be filed in all recommended venues.
37	Pennsylvania Bar	No docket # - Krishna Narine	Pennsylvania Bar	Case to be refiled on new information	Paul Burgoye, Deputy Chief Disciplinary Counsel The Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of Pennsylvania		Dismissed without investigation
38	Pennsylvania Bar	No docket # Andrew Barroway	Pennsylvania Bar	Case to be refiled on new information			Dismissed without investigation
39	Virginia State Bar	Case Docket No. 04-888-1004 - William J. Dick & the law firm Foley & Lardenr	Virginia Bar	Case to be refiled on new information	Denial of Due Process		Dismissed without investigation   *Where Virginia Bar refuses to advance the complaints in accordance with well established rules or return phone calls regarding this matter.  Even after being notified of the conflicts in Florida and New York and perjured statement made Dick to that tribunal and the United States Patent Office in his response.  In the Iviewit rebuttal to the response, evidence of the perjuries were presented.  Also based on an intellectual property docket submitted by Dick on behalf of Foley & Lardner to that tribunal, upon review of the IP docket, Moatz of the USPTO-OED noted that certain information regarding the owners of those patents was false.  This led to suspension of certain of the iviewit intellectual properties at the USPTO.
40	Institute of Professional Representatives Before the European Patent Office (epi)	Complaint against Martyn Molyneaux and law firms Harrison Goddard and Foote and Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon	Chris Mercer, President, epi & Walter Holzer, European Patent Attorney, former President epi,	Ongoing Formal Investigation			2007 – EPI sent documents sent from EPO that had clear evidence of fraud and requested that we contact FBI to contact Interpol to begin investigation on multiple continents. Complaints on file with the Institute of Professional Representatives Before the European Patent Office.  Requests for investigation of Chris Mercer - President although investigation has been formally begun by that office
41	European Patent Office	Complaint against Martyn Molyneaux and law firms Harrison Goddard and Foote and Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon	Alain Pompidou, President Lise Dybdahl, Counsel	Ongoing	Denial of Due Process, Violation of Public Office	Alain Pompidou, President Lise Dybdahl, Counsel Wim Van Der Eijk, Principle Director Int'l Affairs and Legal & Patent Law	2007- In responding to EPI document request EPO sent over documents that were clearly frauds and had been changed on Office Actions Iviewit had submitted.  This led to a second request to have FBI contact Interpol to co-investigate. Complaints on file with the European Patent Office & Against Patent Attorney's Licensed with that Institution, Martyn Molyneaux and his firms being the main accused.  Complaints on file against Molyneaux and all culpable law firms involved in filing the fraudulent applications in Europe.  Requests for oversight at EPO.  EPO and EPI have recommended contacting the FBI to contact Interpol to investigate.
42	Japanese Patent Office			Ongoing			Complaints on file against accused.
43	Scotland Yard / Metropolitan Police	Complaint against Martyn Molyneaux and law firms Harrison Goddard and Foote and Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon CR01-8c94d132	Scotland Yard / Metro Police	Ongoing 2007			Complaints on file against accused.
43	County/Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, Florida	Case No. 502005CC007455XXXXMB Div RB	Judge Laura S. Johnson	Case Voluntarily Withdrawn by opposing party as fraudulent documents were submitted to Judge	Denial of Due Process	Donna Barfield, Esq. Judge Laura S. Johnson	Case relates to Iviewit in that eviction was based on false and fraudulent information tendered to the courts by attorneys acting in violation of their bar rules and executing falsified documents to the courts.  This case was withdrawn for there was no case as it was discovered the documents submitted had been forged.  Action was not taken by the Judge to notify criminal authorities.  The case was an attempt to evict the Bernstein's, while bombing their car, to force them to flee the state of Florida where they were accusing Supreme Court of Florida Justices and Florida Bar employees of crimes involving public office corruptions.
44	County/Circuit Court in and for Palm Beach County, Florida	Case No. 502005CC011311xxxxmb Div RF & Case in Error No. 502005CC007189XXXXMB Div RF	Judge Joseph Marx, recused himself for conflicts after he ruled on set of fraudulent documents.  Immediately thereafter replaced by Judge Nancy Perez	Case Settled on Fraudulent Settlement Papers Submitted by Attorneys for Plaintiff and Defendant.  Judge acknowledges fraudulent documents but states those matters must be taken up with criminal authorities?	Conflict, Denial of Due Process & Violation of Public Office	Judge Joseph Marx Judge Nancy Perez Attorney Kenneth J. Lowenhaupt / Law Offices of Lowenhaupt & Sawyers Attorney Mark Wilensky / Dubiner & Wilensky LLC Attorney Richard Tendler, P.A.	Case relates to Iviewit in that eviction was based on false and fraudulent information tendered to the courts by attorneys acting in violation of their bar rules and executing falsified documents to the courts.  This case was withdrawn for there was no case as it was discovered the documents submitted had been forged.  Action was not taken by the Judge to notify criminal authorities.  The case was an attempt to evict the Bernstein's, while bombing their car, to force them to flee the state of Florida where they were accusing Supreme Court of Florida Justices and Florida Bar employees of crimes involving public office corruptions.  In this second attempt to illegally evict Bernstein's a mass of fraudulent documents were tendered to the court, the judge recused immediately after ruling on a document he knew was fraudulently created by Plaintiff and Defendant counsel working to procure fraudulent documents to effecuate eviction.  This case while appearing on the surface to be an eviction action, when the documents are analyzed it will be evidenced that the Bernstein's were pursuing their tenant rights when three investigatory bodies of Florida (The Department of Business and Professional Regulation,  Code Enforcement for the city of Boynton Beach and the Florida Health Department) had issued warning to the landlord for toxic black mold found at the unit and all units within the complex.  This mold issue was causing Bernstein's infant son to vomit blood  and severly malformed his wife's hands and was causing a mass of ailments to many residents.  Despite this fact, once lawyers and judges were involved, the rights of Bernstein's were severly limited and they were forced to stay in a unit that Dr's had ordered the infant removed from.  This put the Bernstein's infant son in a situation where permanent lung and brain damage may have resulted.  Due to the Denial of Due Process and conflicts found in these matters,  the Bernstein's were finally forced from their home, forced to leave their family's worldly possessions behind and move from the state.  It became obvious with the bombing of their car, the denial of rights to protect their son in courts in Florida that the Bernstein's due to their case in the Florida Supreme Court of Bernstein v. The Florida Bar could not even ascertain counsel that worked on their behalf, in fact their counsel was found colluding with the Plaintiff's counsel, who was found colluding with the  Judge, imparted the appearance that because of the nature of their complaint against the legal community the Bernstein's could find no venue for fair and impartial due process, even where an infant's life was in imminent danger.
	West Palm Beach, Florida Police Dept	Complaint against investigating officers for failure to follow due process and procedure Case #05-26457	Captain Anderson ~ Commander of the Internal Affairs Unit & Lieutenant Reed ~ Criminal Investigation Unit	Ongoing 2006